Clinical sensitivity to ionizing radiation varies considerably among patients, and radiation-induced adverse effects developing in normal tissue can be therapy limiting in >10% of patients (1). Ionizing radiation induces both DNA single-strand breaks and double-strand breaks (DSB), with the DSBs generally considered the lethal event (2). Several syndromes associated with increased radiosensitivity are caused by deficiencies in genes of DSB repair, leading to the hypothesis that the individual repair capacity for these lesions should be an important determinant of individual radiosensitivity (3, 4). Here, three polymorphisms in genes involved in homologous recombination (XRCC3 Thr241Met, XRCC2 Arg188His, and NBS1 Glu185Gln) with potential functional effects (5-8) were evaluated for a possible association with the risk of developing acute skin reactions following radiotherapy in a prospective epidemiologic study.

Study subjects included female breast cancer patients receiving primary radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery as reported (ref. 9; reference no. 37/98 of the ethical committee of the University of Heidelberg). All the patients were given a typical breast radiation treatment with an average biologically effective radiation dose of 54.0 ± 4.8 Gy. Clinical radiation reaction developing in the skin within the radiation field of the breast was documented at regular time intervals during treatment, and the severity of acute side effects was assessed using a classification system based on the Common Toxicity Criteria of the U.S. NIH (10). Seventy-seven of the 446 participants presented with increased acute toxicity (at least one moist desquamation or interruption of radiotherapy due to toxicity) by the end of treatment (9, 11).

DNA extraction, analysis of the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism (rs861539), and quality control was as described (12). The XRCC2 Arg188His (rs3218536) and the NBS1 Glu185Gln (rs1805794) polymorphisms were measured as other variants in (12) by melting curve analysis of sequence-specific hybridization probes (LightCycler, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). For XRCC2 Arg188His, PCR primers were 5′-TTGATATGCTCCGGCTAGTTA-3′ and 5′-CTGCCATGCCTTACAGAGATAA-3′, and probes were 5′-CTTGTAAATGACTATCACCTGGTTCTT-FITC-3′ and 5′-LCRed640-TGCAACGACACAAACTATAATGCAGAAAGCp-3′; for NBS1 Glu185Gln, primers were 5′-TTTTATGGATGTAAACAGCCTCT-3′ and 5′-AAACCTTCCATTAATAATACCGAA-3′, and probes were 5′-LCRed640-AGAAGCAGCCTCCACAAATTGAAAGGTp-3′ and 5′-TGAATTCCTGAAAGCAGTTCAGTCC-FITC-3′ (Tib Molbiol, Berlin, Germany). Genotype information was incomplete for two samples because of an inadequate amount of DNA.

Occurrence of acute skin toxicity was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model in relation to biologically effective radiation dose instead of time in days during radiotherapy, thereby adjusting for differences in radiation dose when acute skin toxicity occurred and for the total dose received (13). As possible confounders, differences by treating hospitals and body mass index were included in all models (9).

Frequencies of rare alleles were 0.41, 0.07, and 0.32 for XRCC3241Met, XRCC2188His, and NBS1185Gln, respectively, consistent with published reports (0.39, XRCC3; 0.06, XRCC2; and 0.32, NBS1) in European populations (8, 12, 14). All genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Overall, we did not observe a significant association between the genetic polymorphisms investigated and the risk of acute skin toxicity after radiotherapy (Table 1). Analysis yielded differences in the associations between XRCC3 and NBS1 polymorphisms and acute skin toxicity for patients with normal weight and overweight (Table 1), which were, however, not statistically significant. When combined effects of alleles were examined, there was neither a significant trend (Ptrend = 0.08) for increased protection associated with increasing number of potentially protective alleles (XRCC3241Thr, XRCC2188His, and NBS1185Gln) in normal weight patients nor significant risk alterations (hazard ratio for carriers of three and more alleles, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-1.66; data not shown).

Table 1.

Genetic polymorphisms in DNA DSB repair genes XRCC3, XRCC2, and NBS1 and risk of developing acute skin toxicity after radiotherapy investigated in all participants and stratified by body mass index

Gene polymorphismTotal population
Normal weight (BMI ≤ 25.0)
Overweight (BMI > 25.0)
No.*HR (95% CI)No.*HR (95% CI)No.*HR (95% CI)
XRCC3 Thr241Met       
    Thr/Thr 156/21 1.00 85/5 1.00 71/16 1.00 
    Thr/Met 212/41 1.34 (0.79-2.29) 104/13 2.28 (0.79-6.56) 108/28 1.15 (0.61-2.14) 
    Met/Met 76/14 1.28 (0.64-2.56) 38/4 1.84 (0.48-6.97) 38/10 1.16 (0.51-2.61) 
    Met carrier 288/55 1.33 (0.80-2.21) 142/17 2.15 (0.78-5.94) 146/38 1.15 (0.64-2.08) 
XRCC2 Arg188His       
    Arg/Arg 387/71 1.00 194/21 1.00 193/50 1.00 
    Arg/His 55/5 0.56 (0.22-1.39) 34/2 0.48 (0.11-2.10) 21/3 0.67 (0.20-2.18) 
    His/His 3/1 0.95 (0.13-7.02) 0/0 NC 3/1 0.73 (0.10-5.55) 
    His carrier 58/6 0.60 (0.26-1.39) 34/2 0.48 (0.11-2.10) 24/4 0.68 (0.24-1.94) 
NBS1 Glu185Gln       
    Glu/Glu 196/36 1.00 110/16 1.00 86/20 1.00 
    Glu/Gln 210/35 0.94 (0.58-1.52) 104/7 0.61 (0.24-1.50) 106/28 1.28 (0.70-2.33) 
    Gln/Gln 39/6 0.90 (0.37-2.22) 14/0 NC 25/6 1.25 (0.48-3.28) 
    Gln carrier 249/41 0.93 (0.59-1.49) 118/7 0.54 (0.22-1.35) 131/34 1.28 (0.71-2.28)§ 
Gene polymorphismTotal population
Normal weight (BMI ≤ 25.0)
Overweight (BMI > 25.0)
No.*HR (95% CI)No.*HR (95% CI)No.*HR (95% CI)
XRCC3 Thr241Met       
    Thr/Thr 156/21 1.00 85/5 1.00 71/16 1.00 
    Thr/Met 212/41 1.34 (0.79-2.29) 104/13 2.28 (0.79-6.56) 108/28 1.15 (0.61-2.14) 
    Met/Met 76/14 1.28 (0.64-2.56) 38/4 1.84 (0.48-6.97) 38/10 1.16 (0.51-2.61) 
    Met carrier 288/55 1.33 (0.80-2.21) 142/17 2.15 (0.78-5.94) 146/38 1.15 (0.64-2.08) 
XRCC2 Arg188His       
    Arg/Arg 387/71 1.00 194/21 1.00 193/50 1.00 
    Arg/His 55/5 0.56 (0.22-1.39) 34/2 0.48 (0.11-2.10) 21/3 0.67 (0.20-2.18) 
    His/His 3/1 0.95 (0.13-7.02) 0/0 NC 3/1 0.73 (0.10-5.55) 
    His carrier 58/6 0.60 (0.26-1.39) 34/2 0.48 (0.11-2.10) 24/4 0.68 (0.24-1.94) 
NBS1 Glu185Gln       
    Glu/Glu 196/36 1.00 110/16 1.00 86/20 1.00 
    Glu/Gln 210/35 0.94 (0.58-1.52) 104/7 0.61 (0.24-1.50) 106/28 1.28 (0.70-2.33) 
    Gln/Gln 39/6 0.90 (0.37-2.22) 14/0 NC 25/6 1.25 (0.48-3.28) 
    Gln carrier 249/41 0.93 (0.59-1.49) 118/7 0.54 (0.22-1.35) 131/34 1.28 (0.71-2.28)§ 

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; NC, not calculated.

*

Number of participants/ patients with acute side effects.

Adjusted for BMI, hospital (four clinics), and photon beam quality for whole breast (two categories) and for boost irradiation (no boost and four categories; ref. 9).

Pinteraction = 0.41.

§

Pinteraction = 0.08.

Our data did not support a significant association of risk of acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery with the XRCC3 Thr241Met, XRCC2 Arg188His, and NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphisms. The possibility of an interaction between genotypes and body mass index cannot be excluded because of the small number of participants in some of the genotype categories. Nevertheless, our study is one of the largest reported and has >80% power to detect a 1.9-fold risk in carriers of the XRCC3241Met allele or the NBS1185Gln allele in the overall study population (see also ref. 13). We minimized sources of bias in our study by restriction on tumor type and type of side effects and accounted for confounding by treatment-related or patient-related characteristics in the data analysis. Analysis for effect modification by body mass index was driven by the previous observation of differential associations between skin toxicity and DNA repair gene polymorphisms in the base excision repair genes XRCC1 and APE1 by body mass index (9, 13).

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between XRCC2 Arg188His and NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphisms and acute side effects of radiotherapy. For XRCC3 Thr241Met, the Thr/Thr genotype was reported to be correlated with increased risk of late effects in irradiated breast cancer patients, such as s.c. fibrosis and telangiectasia (15). This finding was not confirmed in another study of late-adverse radiotherapy effects in gynecologic tumors (16). Our results weakly implicated the XRCC3241Met allele as risk allele and may differ from the other studies because we focused on acute side effects rather than late effects of radiotherapy, which are not necessarily related (17).

All three polymorphisms investigated were predicted to have an maximal effect on cellular, and possibly clinical, function using a algorithm based on allele frequency, potential functional effect, and results from previous epidemiologic studies (18). The XRCC3241Met allele has in fact been associated with an increased number of micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes of humans exposed to ionizing radiation (5, 6). No differences in homology-directed repair of DSB have, however, been found between the wild-type and the variant XRCC3 protein (19), and DSB repair in vitro and acute normal tissue reaction after radiotherapy of breast cancer patients were not correlated (20). Thus, the polymorphisms investigated, although apparently functional, may not give total information about variability in gene function. In the future, a more detailed haplotype analysis of the genes and a comprehensive analysis, including variants in genes of both DSB repair pathways (homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining), and consideration of late effects of radiotherapy will be necessary.

Grant support: German Office for Radiation Protection project no. St. Sch. 4116 and 4233 and USAMRMC FY01 Breast Cancer Research Program grant DAMD17-02-1-0500.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the staff of the participating clinics for their contribution to the data collection; Belinda Kaspereit, Kati Smit, and Peter Waas in DKFZ for excellent technical assistance; and all the patients who participated in the study.

1
Andreassen CN, Alsner J, Overgaard J. Does variability in normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy have a genetic basis: where and how to look for it?
Radiother Oncol
2002
;
64
:
131
–40.
2
Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer.
Nature
2001
;
411
:
366
–74.
3
Digweed M, Sperling K. Nijmegen breakage syndrome: clinical manifestation of defective response to DNA double-strand breaks.
DNA Repair (Amst)
2004
;
3
:
1207
–17.
4
Gatti RA. The inherited basis of human radiosensitivity.
Acta Oncol
2001
;
40
:
702
–11.
5
Aka P, Mateuca R, Buchet JP, Thierens H, Kirsch-Volders M. Are genetic polymorphisms in OGG1, XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes predictive for the DNA strand break repair phenotype and genotoxicity in workers exposed to low dose ionising radiations?
Mutat Res
2004
;
556
:
169
–81.
6
Angelini S, Kumar R, Carbone F, et al. Micronuclei in humans induced by exposure to low level of ionizing radiation: influence of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes.
Mutat Res
2005
;
570
:
105
–17.
7
Medina PP, Ahrendt SA, Pollan M, Fernandez P, Sidransky D, Sanchez-Cespedes M. Screening of homologous recombination gene polymorphisms in lung cancer patients reveals an association of the NBS1–185Gln variant and p53 gene mutations.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2003
;
12
:
699
–704.
8
Rafii S, O'Regan P, Xinarianos G, et al. A potential role for the XRCC2 R188H polymorphic site in DNA-damage repair and breast cancer.
Hum Mol Genet
2002
;
11
:
1433
–8.
9
Twardella D, Popanda O, Helmbold I, et al. Personal characteristics, therapy modalities and individual DNA repair capacity as predictive factors of acute skin toxicity in an unselected cohort of breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.
Radiother Oncol
2003
;
69
:
145
–53.
10
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Toxicity Criteria. NIH 1998; Available from: http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html.
11
Popanda O, Ebbeler R, Twardella D, et al. Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in lymphocytes from breast cancer patients and their correlation with acute skin reactions to radiotherapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2003
;
55
:
1216
–25.
12
Popanda O, Schattenberg T, Phong CT, et al. Specific combinations of DNA repair gene variants and increased risk for non-small cell lung cancer.
Carcinogenesis
2004
;
25
:
2433
–41.
13
Chang-Claude J, Popanda O, Tan XL, et al. Association between polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes, XRCC1, APE1, and XPD and acute side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
4802
–9.
14
Kuschel B, Auranen A, McBride S, et al. Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility.
Hum Mol Genet
2002
;
11
:
1399
–407.
15
Andreassen CN, Alsner J, Overgaard M, Overgaard J. Prediction of normal tissue radiosensitivity from polymorphisms in candidate genes.
Radiother Oncol
2003
;
69
:
127
–35.
16
De Ruyck K, Van Eijkeren M, Claes K, et al. Radiation-induced damage to normal tissues after radiotherapy in patients treated for gynecologic tumors: association with single nucleotide polymorphisms in XRCC1, XRCC3, and OGG1 genes and in vitro chromosomal radiosensitivity in lymphocytes.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2005
;
62
:
1140
–9.
17
Bentzen SM, Overgaard M. Relationship between early and late normal-tissue injury after postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Radiother Oncol
1991
;
20
:
159
–65.
18
Millikan RC, Player JS, Decotret AR, Tse CK, Keku T. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
2326
–34.
19
Araujo FD, Pierce AJ, Stark JM, Jasin M. Variant XRCC3 implicated in cancer is functional in homology-directed repair of double-strand breaks.
Oncogene
2002
;
21
:
4176
–80.
20
El Awady RA, Mahmoud M, Saleh EM, et al. No correlation between radiosensitivity or double-strand break repair capacity of normal fibroblasts and acute normal tissue reaction after radiotherapy of breast cancer patients.
Int J Radiat Biol
2005
;
81
:
501
–8.