Metabolic conversion of estrogen to hydroxyl estrogens has been postulated to be involved in the carcinogenesis of the endometrium. Highly expressed in endometrial tissue, cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) catalyzes the hydroxylation of 17β-estradiol (E2) to catechol estrogens 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OH-E2) and 2-hydroxyestradiol (2-OH-E2; ref. 1). Administration of 4-OH-E2 could induce DNA damage and endometrial adenocarcinoma in CD-1 mice (2). Five common polymorphisms with amino acid substitutions of the CYP1B1 gene have been described; compared with the wild type, CYP1B1 variants in codons 48 (Arg → Gly, rs10012), 119 (Ala → Ser, rs1056827), 432 (Leu → Val, rs1056836), and 453 (Asn → Ser, rs1800440) display 2.4- to 3.4-fold higher catalytic efficiency (1, 3-5). Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) catalyzes O-methylation of catechol estrogens (2-OH-E2 and 4-OH-E2) to methoxy-catechol estrogens (2-MeO-E2 and 4-MeO-E2), which have no estrogenic activity. If the methylation step is incomplete, some of these catechol estrogens could induce DNA single-strand breaks, or initiate the carcinogenic process through reacting with DNA and forming depurinated adducts (6). A functional polymorphism in the COMT gene, a G-to-A transition at codon 108/158 in exon 4 (rs4680), has been reported to result in a 3- to 4-fold reduction in COMT activity (7, 8), although another study suggested that the difference in catalytic activity might be less significant (9). Given the importance of CYP1B1 and COMT in estrogen metabolism, it is biologically possible that polymorphisms of these genes that lead to an increase in CYP1B1 activity and a decrease in COMT activity may influence an individual's susceptibility to the risk of endometrial cancer.

We tested this hypothesis by examining five putative functional polymorphisms of the CYP1B1 and COMT genes using data from a recently completed population-based case-control study of endometrial cancer conducted in Shanghai, China.

Detailed study methods have been published previously (10). In brief, this study includes 1,204 incident cases who were between 30 and 69 years of age at diagnosis and 1,212 randomly selected, age-frequency matched population controls. All study participants were interviewed in person by trained interviewers using a standardized and structured questionnaire. The response rates were 82.8% for cases and 74.4% for controls. In addition to the in-person interview, 10-mL blood samples were obtained from 860 cases (71.4%) and 861 (71.0%) controls. The samples were collected in vacutainer tubes containing EDTA and processed typically within 6 hours of blood draw. The buffy coat (WBC) samples were distributed into 2-mL vials and stored at −70°C. For those who did not donate a blood sample at baseline, we collected a sample of exfoliated buccal cells using a modified mouthwash method (16.5% of cases and 16.7% of controls). All collected mouth-rinse samples were processed within 6 hours of collection, and the cell pellet for each subject was stored in two 2-mL vials at −70°C. As such, a DNA sample was available for 86.5% of cases and 85.2% of controls.

The allelic discrimination of the CYP1B1 and COMT polymorphisms were assessed with the ABI PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using the Taqman genotyping assay with primers and probes obtained from ABI. The Taqman assay method has been described previously (11), and the assay IDs or primers/probes information are listed in Appendix A. The fluorescence level was measured with the ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). Allele frequencies were determined by ABI SDS software. The laboratory staff were blind to the identity of the subjects. Quality control samples were included in the genotyping assays. The concordance rates for the quality control samples were 97.4% (38 of 39) for COMT rs6269 and 100% for all other single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP).

The χ2 test was used to compare the distributions of CYP1B1 and COMT alleles and genotypes in cases and controls. The exact χ2 goodness-of-fit test was used to test Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of the genotypes. Haplotypes were estimated using PHASE software via a Bayesian method (12). Unconditional logistic regression was employed to estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations of CYP1B1 and COMT genotypes with endometrial cancer risk. Interactions between gene-gene and genotype-estrogen exposures were evaluated by constructing a multiplicative term in the logistic regression model. All the analyses were adjusted by age. Potential confounding effects from other demographic factors and known endometrial cancer risk factors, such as educational level, body mass index, age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, and oral contraceptive use, were also examined, and no appreciable confounding was observed.

The distributions of selected demographic characteristics and major risk factors of endometrial cancer among cases and controls have been reported elsewhere (10). Briefly, cases and controls had similar age distribution. Compared with controls, cases had an earlier age at menarche, later age at menopause, and longer duration of menstruation. Cases were more likely to have a higher educational level and a higher body mass index or waist-hip ratio; to have a family history of colorectal, endometrial, or breast cancer among first-degree relatives; to be nulliparous; and to have never used oral contraceptives. Subjects with genotyping data were representative of all participants in the study with regard to the distribution of major demographic and risk factors.

The frequencies of alleles and common haplotypes of CYP1B1 and COMT polymorphisms among cases and controls are shown in Table 1. All CYP1B1 and COMT SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among both cases and controls. The common alleles in CYP1B1 among controls were 81.7% for rs10012, 87.9% for rs1056836, and 87.9% for rs1056837. Variant alleles at rs1056836 and rs1056837 were in strong linkage disequilibrium (Lewontin's D′ = 1.00; correlation, r = 0.99). Among controls, the frequencies of common COMT alleles were 72.8% for rs4680 and 64.1% for rs6269. The most common haplotype for CYP1B1 rs10012, rs1056836, and rs1056837 was C-C-C with the estimated frequencies of 70.5% among cases and 71.5% among controls. Overall, the frequency differences of CYP1B1 and COMT polymorphism and CYP1B1 haplotype between cases and controls were not statistically significant.

Table 1.

Allele frequencies (%) of the CYP1B1 and COMT genes and haplotype distribution of CYP1B1 polymorphisms, the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study

AllelesCases (%)Controls (%)P
CYP1B1     
    rs10012 81.2 81.7 0.68 
 18.8 18.3  
        P (HWE)  0.11 0.25  
    rs1056836 87.6 87.9 0.73 
 12.4 12.1  
        P (HWE)  0.39 0.06  
    rs1056837 87.9 87.9 0.99 
 12.1 12.1  
        P (HWE)  0.22 0.05  
COMT     
    rs4680 73.2 72.8 0.76 
 26.8 27.2  
        P (HWE)  0.09 0.16  
    rs6269 64.3 64.1 0.87 
 35.7 35.9  
        P (HWE)  0.62 0.31  
   
Estimated frequency of CYP1B1 haplotypes (in the order of SNP 1-2-3 based on their chromosome positions)
 
  

 

 
Cases
 
Controls
 

 
C-C-C  70.5 71.5  
C-G-C  0.4 0.1  
C-G-T  10.3 10.0  
G-C-C  17.0 16.3  
G-G-T  1.8 1.9  
Overall χ2 test   P = 0.38  
AllelesCases (%)Controls (%)P
CYP1B1     
    rs10012 81.2 81.7 0.68 
 18.8 18.3  
        P (HWE)  0.11 0.25  
    rs1056836 87.6 87.9 0.73 
 12.4 12.1  
        P (HWE)  0.39 0.06  
    rs1056837 87.9 87.9 0.99 
 12.1 12.1  
        P (HWE)  0.22 0.05  
COMT     
    rs4680 73.2 72.8 0.76 
 26.8 27.2  
        P (HWE)  0.09 0.16  
    rs6269 64.3 64.1 0.87 
 35.7 35.9  
        P (HWE)  0.62 0.31  
   
Estimated frequency of CYP1B1 haplotypes (in the order of SNP 1-2-3 based on their chromosome positions)
 
  

 

 
Cases
 
Controls
 

 
C-C-C  70.5 71.5  
C-G-C  0.4 0.1  
C-G-T  10.3 10.0  
G-C-C  17.0 16.3  
G-G-T  1.8 1.9  
Overall χ2 test   P = 0.38  

NOTE: The number of participants does not add up to the total number of women because of missing data on genotypes for some participants. SNP1, rs10012; SNP2, rs1056836; SNP3, rs1056837.

Abbreviation: HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

We did not find significant associations of CYP1B1 and COMT genotypes with endometrial cancer risk (Table 2). Analyses stratified by menopausal status showed similar results, and no interaction between menopausal status and genotype was evident (all Ps for interaction tests were > 0.05). We also examined the interaction of CYP1B1 and COMT genotypes with estrogen-related factors, such as body mass index, waist-hip ratio, years of menstruation, and oral contraceptive use, and found no significant interaction (data not shown).

Table 2.

Associations between CYP1B1 and COMT genotypes and endometrial cancer risk

All subjects
Premenopausal women
Postmenopausal women
CasesControlsOR* (95% CI)CasesControlsOR* (95% CI)CasesControlsOR* (95% CI)
CYP1B1          
    rs10012          
        C/C 676 693 1.0 287 252 1.0 389 441 1.0 
        C/G 333 298 1.16 (0.97-1.39) 146 127 0.99 (0.74-1.33) 187 171 1.24 (0.97-1.59) 
        G/G 29 40 0.75 (0.46-1.22) 17 16 0.95 (0.47-1.93) 12 24 0.57 (0.28-1.15) 
        Ptrend   0.69   0.91   0.63 
        C/C+C/G 1,009 991 1.0 433 379 1.0 576 612 1.0 
        G/G 29 40 0.71 (0.44-1.15) 17 16 0.95 (0.47-1.92) 12 24 0.53 (0.26-1.07) 
        Pinteraction = 0.27          
    rs1056836          
        C/C 792 806 1.0 351 299 1.0 441 507 1.0 
        C/G 232 206 1.16 (0.94-1.42) 93 90 0.87 (0.63-1.21) 139 116 1.38 (1.05-1.82) 
        G/G 13 22 0.61 (0.30-1.21) 0.64 (0.21-1.94) 15 0.54 (0.22-1.33) 
        Ptrend   0.73   0.28   0.23 
        C/C+C/G 1,024 1,012 1.0 444 389 1.0 580 623 1.0 
        G/G 13 22 0.59 (0.29-1.17) 0.66 (0.22-2.00) 15 0.50 (0.20-1.24) 
        Pinteraction = 0.62          
    rs1056837          
        C/C 797 803 1.0 353 297 1.0 444 506 1.0 
        C/T 229 205 1.14 (0.93-1.41) 94 91 0.86 (0.62-1.20) 135 114 1.35 (1.02-1.79) 
        T/T 11 22 0.51 (0.25-1.06) 0.42 (0.12-1.45) 15 0.53 (0.22-1.32) 
        Ptrend   0.99   0.16   0.30 
        C/C+C/T 1,026 1,008 1.0 447 388 1.0 579 620 1.0 
        T/T 11 22 0.49 (0.24-1.02) 0.43 (0.13-1.50) 15 0.50 (0.20-1.24) 
        Pinteraction = 0.94          
COMT          
    rs4680          
        G/G 563 534 1.0 229 204 1.0 334 330 1.0 
        A/G 383 425 0.88 (0.74-1.05) 176 160 0.97 (0.73-1.29) 207 265 0.77 (0.61-0.98) 
        A/A 85 67 1.24 (0.89-1.74) 42 30 1.24 (0.75-2.06) 43 37 1.15 (0.72-1.83) 
        Ptrend   0.76   0.64   0.33 
        G/G+A/G 946 959 1.0 405 364 1.0 541 595 1.0 
        A/A 85 67 1.29 (0.92-1.79) 42 30 1.25 (0.77-2.05) 43 37 1.28 (0.81-2.01) 
        Pinteraction = 0.99          
    rs6269          
        A/A 420 414 1.0 194 161 1.0 226 253 1.0 
        A/G 478 489 0.98 (0.82-1.16) 204 178 0.94 (0.70-1.26) 274 311 0.99 (0.78-1.26) 
        G/G 127 125 1.01 (0.77-1.33) 48 54 0.74 (0.47-1.15) 79 71 1.24 (0.86-1.80) 
        Ptrend   0.87   0.22   0.39 
        A/A+A/G 898 903 1.0 398 339 1.0 500 564 1.0 
        G/G 127 125 1.02 (0.79-1.33) 48 54 0.76 (0.50-1.15) 79 71 1.26 (0.89-1.77) 
        Pinteraction = 0.07          
All subjects
Premenopausal women
Postmenopausal women
CasesControlsOR* (95% CI)CasesControlsOR* (95% CI)CasesControlsOR* (95% CI)
CYP1B1          
    rs10012          
        C/C 676 693 1.0 287 252 1.0 389 441 1.0 
        C/G 333 298 1.16 (0.97-1.39) 146 127 0.99 (0.74-1.33) 187 171 1.24 (0.97-1.59) 
        G/G 29 40 0.75 (0.46-1.22) 17 16 0.95 (0.47-1.93) 12 24 0.57 (0.28-1.15) 
        Ptrend   0.69   0.91   0.63 
        C/C+C/G 1,009 991 1.0 433 379 1.0 576 612 1.0 
        G/G 29 40 0.71 (0.44-1.15) 17 16 0.95 (0.47-1.92) 12 24 0.53 (0.26-1.07) 
        Pinteraction = 0.27          
    rs1056836          
        C/C 792 806 1.0 351 299 1.0 441 507 1.0 
        C/G 232 206 1.16 (0.94-1.42) 93 90 0.87 (0.63-1.21) 139 116 1.38 (1.05-1.82) 
        G/G 13 22 0.61 (0.30-1.21) 0.64 (0.21-1.94) 15 0.54 (0.22-1.33) 
        Ptrend   0.73   0.28   0.23 
        C/C+C/G 1,024 1,012 1.0 444 389 1.0 580 623 1.0 
        G/G 13 22 0.59 (0.29-1.17) 0.66 (0.22-2.00) 15 0.50 (0.20-1.24) 
        Pinteraction = 0.62          
    rs1056837          
        C/C 797 803 1.0 353 297 1.0 444 506 1.0 
        C/T 229 205 1.14 (0.93-1.41) 94 91 0.86 (0.62-1.20) 135 114 1.35 (1.02-1.79) 
        T/T 11 22 0.51 (0.25-1.06) 0.42 (0.12-1.45) 15 0.53 (0.22-1.32) 
        Ptrend   0.99   0.16   0.30 
        C/C+C/T 1,026 1,008 1.0 447 388 1.0 579 620 1.0 
        T/T 11 22 0.49 (0.24-1.02) 0.43 (0.13-1.50) 15 0.50 (0.20-1.24) 
        Pinteraction = 0.94          
COMT          
    rs4680          
        G/G 563 534 1.0 229 204 1.0 334 330 1.0 
        A/G 383 425 0.88 (0.74-1.05) 176 160 0.97 (0.73-1.29) 207 265 0.77 (0.61-0.98) 
        A/A 85 67 1.24 (0.89-1.74) 42 30 1.24 (0.75-2.06) 43 37 1.15 (0.72-1.83) 
        Ptrend   0.76   0.64   0.33 
        G/G+A/G 946 959 1.0 405 364 1.0 541 595 1.0 
        A/A 85 67 1.29 (0.92-1.79) 42 30 1.25 (0.77-2.05) 43 37 1.28 (0.81-2.01) 
        Pinteraction = 0.99          
    rs6269          
        A/A 420 414 1.0 194 161 1.0 226 253 1.0 
        A/G 478 489 0.98 (0.82-1.16) 204 178 0.94 (0.70-1.26) 274 311 0.99 (0.78-1.26) 
        G/G 127 125 1.01 (0.77-1.33) 48 54 0.74 (0.47-1.15) 79 71 1.24 (0.86-1.80) 
        Ptrend   0.87   0.22   0.39 
        A/A+A/G 898 903 1.0 398 339 1.0 500 564 1.0 
        G/G 127 125 1.02 (0.79-1.33) 48 54 0.76 (0.50-1.15) 79 71 1.26 (0.89-1.77) 
        Pinteraction = 0.07          

NOTE: The number of participants does not add up to the total number of women because of missing data on genotypes for some participants.

*

Unconditional logistic model adjusted for age.

The likelihood ratio test was done to explore the relationship between common CYP1B1 haplotypes and endometrial cancer risk, pooling all haplotypes with frequencies <5% into a single category. Using the most common haplotype, which contains wild alleles at rs1002, rs1056836, and rs1056837 as the reference group, we did not find an association between CYP1B1 haplotypes and endometrial cancer (data not shown).

We further explored the joint effect of two SNPs of the COMT gene on endometrial cancer risk. Comparing genotype AA with the GG/AG genotypes for SNP rs4680 among subjects carrying none or one variant allele in rs6269, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.29 (0.92-1.82). Among women with none or one variant allele in rs4680, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.05 (0.81-1.27) for the GG genotype in SNP rs6269 compared with the AA/AG genotypes. Similarly, using women carrying none or one variant allele in CYP1B1 SNPs rs10012, rs1056836, and rs1056837 as the reference group, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.77 (0.48-1.23) for women carrying any one of the homozygous variant-type alleles of CYP1B1 SNPs and 0.50 (0.24-1.03) for women carrying any two of the homozygous variant-type alleles. Finally, we examined the potential interactive effect between CYP1B1 and COMT genotypes and no significant interaction was observed.

Laboratory studies have shown that both CYP1B1 and COMT are expressed in the endometrium (1, 7, 13). CYP1B1 and COMT are involved in the hydroxylation and conjugation of estradiol and thus may be important factors contributing to host susceptibility to endometrial cancer. CYP1B1 variants are more efficient than wild types in the conversion and accumulation of carcinogenic catechol estrogens (1). The COMT variants, on the other hand, are associated with a reduction of inactivating catechol estrogens to nongenotoxic methylethers (7, 8). Therefore, it is biologically possible that women with the variant genotypes of CYP1B1 and COMT may have a greater risk of endometrial cancer.

Polymorphisms of CYP1B1 have been investigated in relation to breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers with conflicting results (3, 8, 9, 14, 15). In our large-scale, case-control study conducted in Shanghai, we found that CYP1B1 SNPs in codons 48, 119, and 432 were not associated with breast cancer risk (15). Four epidemiologic studies, mostly conducted in Caucasians, which have investigated CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms in relation to endometrial cancer risk in recent years have resulted in mixed findings (16-19). Rylander-Rudqvist et al. found no overall association between the CYP1B1 codon 48, 119, and 453 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk (16). Similarly, Doherty et al. reported no strong alteration in risk among women with the CYP1B1 codon 432 variant alleles (17). However, in a nested case-control study, McGrath et al. reported that a decreased risk of endometrial cancer was associated with the CYP1B1 codon 453 variant allele (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.91; ref. 18) but not with the CYP1B1 codon 432 polymorphism. A case-control study that included 113 Japanese endometrial cancer patients and 100 healthy female controls observed a significantly increased risk of endometrial cancer associated with the CYP1B1 codon 119 and 432 polymorphisms (19). Although our results differ from the findings of the small-scale Japanese study (19), our results are consistent with most previous studies (16-18), depicting no association of endometrial cancer risk with CYP1B1 genotypes.

We did not find any association between COMT rs4680 and rs6269 genotypes and the risk of endometrial cancer. Previous studies investigating the relationship of COMT rs4680 genotype and hormone-related cancers have had inconsistent results (9, 15, 17, 18, 20). McGrath et al. did not observe an association between the COMT rs4680 genotype and endometrial cancer (18), whereas Doherty et al. reported that the low-activity allele was associated with a slightly decreased risk of endometrial cancer (17). The inconsistency in study findings may result from the ethnic differences of the study populations and the limitations of the study designs. One recent study also suggested that other functional variations, especially regulatory variations, might exist and that COMT haplotypes could be used to ascertain the effect of COMT on disease etiology (21). Results from another study showed that CpG hypermethylation could selectively inactivate COMT, leading to the accumulation of catechol estrogens and promotion of endometrial carcinogenesis (22).

Chinese women typically have a low level of circulating estrogen (23), which might mask the effect of estrogen metabolic gene polymorphisms. We conducted analyses among women with conditions related to a high level or long period of estrogen exposure, such as women with high body mass index/waist-hip ratio and longer durations of menstruation. However, we failed to find any gene-environment interactions with the above factors.

Strengths of this study include the population-based study design and large sample size, which minimized selection bias and led to relatively stable risk estimation. The detailed exposure information enabled an evaluation of gene-environment interactions. Nevertheless, the statistical power in subgroups of our study remained limited due to the low frequencies of variant alleles, which prevented our ability to identify weak associations. The study applied the candidate gene approach, which primarily focuses on the potential function of common genetic variants (>5%) and SNPs with amino acid changes. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that SNPs of CYP1B1 and COMT other than those included in our study may be related to the risk of endometrial cancer. Given that multiple genes are involved in estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism (24, 25), the confounding and/or modifying effects of other genes also cannot be excluded.

In summary, we found no strong evidence that common polymorphisms of the CYP1B1 and COMT genes play a major role in the development of endometrial cancer among Chinese women.

Appendix A.

Summary of the genotyping assays of CYP1B1 and COMT polymorphisms

Gene SNP Primer sequence (5′-3′) Probe sequence (5′-3′) 
CYP1B1 R48G (rs10012) F, GCTGCTGAGGCAACGGA VIC, CAGCTCCGGTCCGC 
  R, CAGTGGCCACGCAAACG FAM, AGCTCGGGTCCGC 
 V432L (rs1056836) F, GATCAAAGTTCTCCGGGTTAGG VIC, ATGACCCACTGAAGTG 
  R, TTTGTCAACCAGTGGTCTGTGAAT FAM, ATGACCCAGTGAAGTG 
COMT D449D (rs1056837) ABI Assay ID: C_3099975_20 ABI Assay ID: C_3099975_20 
 V158M (rs4680) F, CCCAGCGGATGGTGGAT VIC, TTCGCTGGCATGAAG 
  R, CAGGCATGCACACCTTGTC FAM, TCGCTGGCGTGAAG 
 rs6259 ABI Assay ID: C_2538746_1_ ABI Assay ID: C_2538746_1_ 
Gene SNP Primer sequence (5′-3′) Probe sequence (5′-3′) 
CYP1B1 R48G (rs10012) F, GCTGCTGAGGCAACGGA VIC, CAGCTCCGGTCCGC 
  R, CAGTGGCCACGCAAACG FAM, AGCTCGGGTCCGC 
 V432L (rs1056836) F, GATCAAAGTTCTCCGGGTTAGG VIC, ATGACCCACTGAAGTG 
  R, TTTGTCAACCAGTGGTCTGTGAAT FAM, ATGACCCAGTGAAGTG 
COMT D449D (rs1056837) ABI Assay ID: C_3099975_20 ABI Assay ID: C_3099975_20 
 V158M (rs4680) F, CCCAGCGGATGGTGGAT VIC, TTCGCTGGCATGAAG 
  R, CAGGCATGCACACCTTGTC FAM, TCGCTGGCGTGAAG 
 rs6259 ABI Assay ID: C_2538746_1_ ABI Assay ID: C_2538746_1_ 

Abbreviations: F: forward; R: reverse.

Grant support: National Cancer Institute/USPHS grant R01CA92585.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Dr. Fan Jin for her contributions in implementing the study in Shanghai and Bethanie Hull and Brandy Bentley for technical support in article preparation. This study would not have been possible without the support of all of the study participants and research staff of the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study.

1
Hanna IH, Dawling S, Roodi N, Guengerich FP, Parl FF. Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) pharmacogenetics: association of polymorphisms with functional differences in estrogen hydroxylation activity.
Cancer Res
2000
;
60
:
3440
–4.
2
Newbold RR, Liehr JG. Induction of uterine adenocarcinoma in CD-1 mice by catechol estrogens.
Cancer Res
2000
;
60
:
235
–7.
3
Bailey LR, Roodi N, Dupont WD, Parl FF. Association of cytochrome P450 (CYP1B1) polymorphism with steroid receptor status in breast cancer.
Cancer Res
1998
;
58
:
5038
–41.
4
Stoilov I, Akarsu AN, Alozie I. Sequence analysis and homology modeling suggest that primary congenital glaucoma on 2p21 results from mutations disrupting either the hinge region or the conserved core structures of cytochrome P450 1B1.
Am J Hum Genet
1998
;
62
:
573
–84.
5
Aklillu E, Oscarson M, Hidestrand M, Leidvik B, Otter C, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Functional analysis of six different polymorphic CYP1B1 enzyme variants found in an Ethiopian population.
Mol Pharmacol
2002
;
61
:
586
–94.
6
Dawling S, Roodi N, Mernaugh RL, Mernauqh RL, Wang X, Parl FF. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)-mediated metabolism of catechol estrogens: comparison of wild-type and variant COMT isoforms.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
6716
–22.
7
Goodman JE, Jensen LT, He P, Yager JD. Characterization of human soluble high and low activity catechol-O-methyltransferase catalyzed catechol estrogen methylation.
Pharmacogenetics
2002
;
12
:
517
–28.
8
Saintot M, Malaveille C, Hautefeuille A, Gerber M. Interactions between genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450–1B1, sulfotransferase 1A1, catechol-O-methyltransferase and tobacco exposure in breast cancer risk.
Int J Cancer
2003
;
107
:
652
–7.
9
Goodman JE, Lavigne JA, Hengstler JG, Tanner B, Helzlsouer KJ, Yager JD. Catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism is not associated with ovarian cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2000
;
9
:
1373
–6.
10
Tao MH, Xu WH, Zheng W, et al. Oral contraceptive and IUD use and endometrial cancer: A population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China.
Int J Cancer
2006
;
119
:
2142
–7.
11
Cai Q, Shu XO, Wen W, et al. Functional Ser326Cys polymorphism in hOGG1 genes is not associated with breast cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2006
;
15
:
403
–4.
12
Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data.
Am J Hum Genet
2001
;
68
:
978
–89.
13
Vadlamur SV, Glover DD, Turner T, Sarkar MA. Regiospecific expression of cytochrome P4501A1 and 1B1 in human uterine tissue.
Cancer Lett
1998
;
122
:
143
–50.
14
Sellers TA, Schildkraut JM, Pankratz VS, et al. Estrogen bioactivation, genetic polymorphisms, and ovarian cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
2536
–43.
15
Wen WQ, Cai QY, Shu XO, et al. Cytochrome P450 1B1 and catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study and a meta-analysis.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
329
–35.
16
Rylander-Rudqvist T, Wedren S, Jonasdottir G, et al. Cytochrome P450 1B1 gene polymorphisms and postmenopausal endometrial cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2004
;
13
:
1515
–20.
17
Doherty JA, Weiss NS, Freeman RJ, et al. Genetic factors in catechol estrogen metabolism in relation to the risk of endometrial cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
357
–66.
18
McGrath M, Hankinson SE, Arbeitman L, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I. Cytochrome P450 1B1 and catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphisms and endometrial cancer susceptibility.
Carcinogenesis
2004
;
25
:
559
–65.
19
Sasaki M, Tanaka Y, Kaneuchi M, Sakuragi N, Dahiya R. CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms have higher risk for endometrial cancer, and positive correlations with estrogen receptor a and estrogen receptor β expressions.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
3913
–8.
20
Cheng TC, Chen ST, Huang CS, et al. Breast cancer risk associated with genotype polymorphism of catechol estrogen-metabolizing genes: a multigenic study on cancer susceptibility.
Int J Cancer
2005
;
113
:
345
–53.
21
DeMille MM, Kidd JR, Ruggeri V, et al. Population variation in linkage disequilibrium across the COMT gene considering promoter region and coding region variation.
Hum Genet
2002
;
111
:
521
–37.
22
Sasaki M, Kaneuchi M, Sakuragi N, Dahiya R. Multiple promoters of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene are selectively inactivated by CpG hypermethylation in endometrial cancer.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
3101
–6.
23
Randolph JF, Jr., Sowwers M, Bondarenko IV, Harlow SD, Luborsky JL, Little RJ. Change in estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone across the early menopausal transition: effects of ethnicity and age.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
1555
–61.
24
Dunning AM, Dowsett M, Healey CS, et al. Polymorphisms associated with circulating sex hormone levels in postmenopausal women.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2004
;
96
:
936
–45.
25
Tworoger SS, Chubak J, Aiello EJ, et al. Association of CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT polymorphisms with serum and urinary sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2004
;
13
:
94
–101.