Background: Although malignant colorectal neoplasms are found more frequently in older population, polyps found at one-time colonoscopy may be a mixture of lesions that developed at various earlier ages. Newly developed adenomas found at the follow-up colonoscopies will reflect the exact relation between malignant potential and the age of development of colorectal polyps.

Methods: The results of 44,065 follow-up colonoscopies on 11,912 subjects were analyzed. The proportion of invasive cancer or high-grade dysplasia among all neoplasms, “proportion of malignancy,” was evaluated in relation to age groups (young: <50 years old; middle: 50-59 years old; and old: ≥60 years old).

Results: At the follow-up colonoscopies, a total of 8,271 newly developed neoplasms were found, of which 41 (0.50%) lesions were malignant. The proportion of malignancy was 0.35%, 0.31%, and 1.07% in the young, middle, and old age groups, respectively (Ptrend = 0.002). This trend remained significant when stratified by the size of polyps. The proportion of malignancy was higher on the left-side colon than on the right-side colon, except in the old age group, where it was similar on either side. The proportion of malignancy at the follow-ups was not associated with the lesions found at the initial colonoscopies.

Conclusions: The development of malignant lesions in small sizes increased on the colon or rectum at older ages. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(12):2418–21)

It has been generally accepted that colorectal cancers and adenomas are found more frequently in older population (1-5). On the basis of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence theory, colorectal adenomas are regarded as precancerous lesions that progress to colorectal cancers, taking a long time in multistep malignant transformation (6-10). Based on this hypothesis, the oldest polyp, which developed at the earliest age, has the greatest chance of malignant transformation. In older people, colorectal polyps may include those that developed a long time ago, having enough time for malignant transformation, leading to higher incidence of cancers among them. Thus, the reason why colorectal cancers are more prevalent in older people can be explained.

However, the polyps developing at old ages may have a higher intrinsic potential for malignant transformation, requiring less time for cancer development from benign adenomas; or there may be another way of carcinogenesis in older people other than adenoma-carcinoma sequence (4, 11-14).

To examine these possibilities, we conducted the present study. Because the polyps found at one-time colonoscopy are a mixture of lesions that developed at various earlier times, we analyzed newly developed adenomas after clearing all neoplastic lesions by total colonoscopies.

Subjects

We consecutively enrolled asymptomatic Japanese who underwent total colonoscopy as part of their annual medical health checkup at the Kameda General Hospital or Makuhari Clinic between 1988 and 2002. None had overt rectal bleeding, recent change in bowel habits, or recent or current lower abdominal pain. They had not been screened by fecal occult blood tests or other examinations for colorectal cancer, and they underwent colonoscopy as the first-choice examination to check for colorectal diseases. Subjects with a personal history of colorectal cancer, colorectal polyps, or inflammatory bowel disease had been excluded. All subjects were encouraged to undergo annual follow-up examinations by total colonoscopy irrespective of the results of previous examinations. Subjects with incomplete intubation or incomplete removal of polyps were excluded for analysis at the initial examinations. Subjects with invasive cancers found at the initial examinations underwent surgical operation and were excluded from follow-up analysis. All colorectal neoplasms found at follow-up colonoscopies were included in the analysis. The subjects enrolled in this study included the subjects of a previous study (5).

The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of each institution, and informed consent was obtained from each subject according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Endoscopic Procedures

Each subject ingested 2 liters of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for bowel preparation. Medium-length colonoscopes were used (mainly PCF200 and PCF230, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). During the procedure, the location and size of each polyp were documented. The size of each polyp was estimated with open-biopsy forceps (diameter 8 mm). All of the polyps ≥5 mm and lesions <5 mm suspected of neoplasia were resected endoscopically or by surgical operation. We did not remove small polyps that were felt to be hyperplastic or inflammatory by macroscopic endoscopic examination. All pathologic specimens were evaluated by the same pathologists of the Kameda General Hospital. Neoplastic lesions were classified into invasive cancer, adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and low-grade dysplasia.

Definitions and Classifications

Malignant lesions were defined as invasive cancer or high-grade dysplasia. The proportion of malignant lesions among all neoplastic lesions was calculated for lesions found at the follow-up colonoscopies stratified by the age of patients, the size and location of colorectal lesions, or the previous findings at the initial colonoscopy.

The subjects were divided into the young (<50 years old), middle (50-59 years old), and old (≥60 years old) age groups. The size of the lesion was classified into <10, 10 to 19, and ≥20 mm. The location was classified into right-side or left-side colon divided at the splenic flexure, which was included in the left-side colon. The findings at the initial colonoscopy were classified according to the most advanced lesion as “no neoplasm,” with no neoplastic lesions; “small adenoma,” with only benign adenoma of <10 mm; and “advanced lesion,” with adenoma of ≥10 mm or malignant lesion.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis regarding the proportion of malignant lesions with respect to age was done using the χ2 trend test or exact trend test. When the proportion was compared between two groups, χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used. A multivariate analysis of associating factors for malignant lesions was conducted by a multiple logistic regression model. A two-sided P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were done with SAS for Windows software version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Subjects

A total of 68,053 screening colonoscopies were done from January 1988 to March 2002, including first-time endoscopies for 21,419 subjects, where all neoplastic lesions, if any, were endoscopically removed. Out of them, 11,912 subjects underwent at least one follow-up colonoscopy: 3,276 once, 2,115 twice, and 6,521 thrice or more, amounting to a total of 44,065 follow-up colonoscopies, with the mean follow-up period of 5.47 years, the mean examination number of 4.71 times, and the mean examination interval of 1.47 years.

Proportion of Malignancy among Neoplastic Lesions Found at Follow-up Colonoscopies

At the follow-up colonoscopies on 11,912 subjects, a total of 8,271 colorectal neoplasms were detected in 2,736 (23.0%) subjects. Out of them, 41 lesions (0.50%) were malignant, including 9 invasive cancers (Table 1). The proportion of malignant neoplasms among all the neoplastic lesions was 0.35% (10 of 2,885), 0.31% (11 of 3,509), and 1.07% (20 of 1,877) in the young, middle, and old age groups, respectively, revealing a significant trend of increase with age (P = 0.002).

Table 1.

Proportion of malignancy of colorectal polyps according to age groups

Age (y)Proportion of malignancy (%)
<50 0.35 (10/2,885) 
50-59 0.31 (11/3,509) 
≥60 1.07 (20/1,877) 
Total 0.50 (41/8,271) 
Age (y)Proportion of malignancy (%)
<50 0.35 (10/2,885) 
50-59 0.31 (11/3,509) 
≥60 1.07 (20/1,877) 
Total 0.50 (41/8,271) 

NOTE: The proportion of malignancy (%) was calculated as the number of malignant lesions divided by the number of all neoplastic lesions found at the follow-up colonoscopies. A significant trend of increase with age was shown (P = 0.002 by the χ2 trend test).

Malignant Potential Stratified by Size of Colorectal Neoplasm

The proportion of malignant neoplasms stratified by the size is shown in Table 2, showing a strong association between the two (P < 0.0001). When stratified also by age, the proportion increased with age in each size group (Table 2). The proportion of malignant neoplasms among lesions <20 mm was 0.21%, 0.31%, and 0.75% in the young, middle, and old age groups, respectively, showing a significant increasing trend with age (P = 0.005).

Table 2.

Proportion of malignancy of colorectal polyps according to age groups and size of polyps

Age (y)Proportion of malignancy (%)
<10 mm*10-19 mm*≥20 mm
≤50 0.07 (2/2,809) 5.7 (4/70) 67 (4/6) 
50-59 0.12 (4/3,385) 6.0 (7/116) 0 (0/8) 
≥60 0.22 (4/1,794) 13.7 (10/73) 60 (6/10) 
Total 0.13 (10/7,988) 8.1 (21/259) 42 (10/24) 
Age (y)Proportion of malignancy (%)
<10 mm*10-19 mm*≥20 mm
≤50 0.07 (2/2,809) 5.7 (4/70) 67 (4/6) 
50-59 0.12 (4/3,385) 6.0 (7/116) 0 (0/8) 
≥60 0.22 (4/1,794) 13.7 (10/73) 60 (6/10) 
Total 0.13 (10/7,988) 8.1 (21/259) 42 (10/24) 
*

The proportion of malignant neoplasm among the lesions of <20 mm showed a significant increasing trend by age (P = 0.005).

P < 0.0001 among size groups by the χ2 trend test.

Malignant Potential in Relation to Age Stratified by Location of Colorectal Neoplasm

Out of 8,271 colorectal neoplasms, 4,304 lesions (52.0%) were located on the right-side colon, and 3,967 were located on the left-side colon. The proportion of malignant neoplasms in each location group is shown in Table 3. The proportion of malignant neoplasms tended to increase with age in each location group. The proportion of malignancy was usually greater on the left-side colon than on the right-side colon (P = 0.0001). However, it was similar on both sides in the old age group due to its steep age-related increase on the right-side colon.

Table 3.

Proportion of malignancy of colorectal polyps according to age groups and location of polyps

Age (y)Proportion of malignancy (%)
Right side*Left side
≤50 0.23 (3/1,327) 0.45 (7/1,558) 
50-59 0.11 (2/1,881) 0.55 (9/1,628) 
≥60 1.00 (11/1,096) 1.15 (9/781) 
Total 0.37 (16/4,304) 0.63 (25/3,967) 
Age (y)Proportion of malignancy (%)
Right side*Left side
≤50 0.23 (3/1,327) 0.45 (7/1,558) 
50-59 0.11 (2/1,881) 0.55 (9/1,628) 
≥60 1.00 (11/1,096) 1.15 (9/781) 
Total 0.37 (16/4,304) 0.63 (25/3,967) 
*

P = 0.004 among age groups by the exact trend test.

P = 0.03 between location groups by the Fisher's exact test.

P = 0.0001 between location groups by the χ2 test.

Malignant Potential Stratified by Initial Colorectal Lesions

Then, the 11,912 subjects were classified according to the most advanced lesion found at the initial colonoscopy, into no neoplasm group (n = 9,409, 79.0%), small adenoma group (2,103, 17.7%), and advanced lesion group (400, 3.4%). Out of 8,271 colorectal neoplasms detected during follow-up colonoscopies, 4,584 lesions (0.49 per person) developed from the no neoplasm group, 2,955 lesions (1.41 per person) developed from the small adenoma group, and 732 lesions (1.83 per person) developed from the advanced lesion group. A greater number of colorectal neoplasms developed from the subjects with more advanced lesions at the initial examinations (P < 0.0001). The proportion of malignancy was 0.54% (25 of 4,584), 0.41% (12 of 2,955), and 0.55% (4 of 732) in no neoplasm, small adenoma, and advanced lesion groups, respectively, with no overall difference found among the groups (Table 4). The proportion of malignancy was 1.07% (15 of 1,401), 0.51% (5 of 977), and 0.80% (2 of 249) in each group at the first surveillance, also with no overall difference found among the groups.

Table 4.

Incidence of colorectal neoplasm according to initial lesions and proportion of malignancy according to initial lesions and age groups

Initial lesion
No neoplasmSmall adenomaAdvanced lesion
Number of lesions per person (lesions/persons)    
    All neoplasm* 0.49 (4,584/9,409) 1.41 (2,955/2,103) 1.83 (732/400) 
    Malignant 0.27% (25/9,409) 0.57% (12/2,103) 1.00% (4/400) 
Proportion (%) of malignancy per lesion (malignancy/all lesions)    
    Age (y)    
        ≤50 0.43 (8/1,879) 0.11 (1/879) 0.79 (1/127) 
        50-59 0.36 (7/1,925) 0.33 (4/1,216) 0.00 (0/368) 
        ≥60 1.28 (10/780) 0.81§ (7/860) 1.27 (3/237) 
    Total 0.54 (25/4,584) 0.41 (12/2,955) 0.55 (4/732) 
Initial lesion
No neoplasmSmall adenomaAdvanced lesion
Number of lesions per person (lesions/persons)    
    All neoplasm* 0.49 (4,584/9,409) 1.41 (2,955/2,103) 1.83 (732/400) 
    Malignant 0.27% (25/9,409) 0.57% (12/2,103) 1.00% (4/400) 
Proportion (%) of malignancy per lesion (malignancy/all lesions)    
    Age (y)    
        ≤50 0.43 (8/1,879) 0.11 (1/879) 0.79 (1/127) 
        50-59 0.36 (7/1,925) 0.33 (4/1,216) 0.00 (0/368) 
        ≥60 1.28 (10/780) 0.81§ (7/860) 1.27 (3/237) 
    Total 0.54 (25/4,584) 0.41 (12/2,955) 0.55 (4/732) 

NOTE: Proportion of malignancy was not associated with initial colorectal lesions but with age.

*

P = 0.0001 among initial lesion groups by the χ2 trend test.

P = 0.004 among initial lesion groups by the exact trend test.

P = 0.04 among age groups by the exact trend test.

§

P = 0.02 among age groups by the exact trend test.

However, when stratified by age, the proportion of malignant neoplasms tended to increase according to age groups in each group of the initial lesions. The trend was shown in the no neoplasm group (0.43%, 0.36%, and 1.28%, in the young, middle, and old age groups, respectively, P = 0.04) and in the small adenoma group (0.11%, 0.33%, and 0.81%, P = 0.02).

Multivariate Analysis

A multivariate analysis controlling age, gender, examination interval, follow-up time, initial number of polyps, initial maximum size of polyps, and family history of colorectal cancer was conducted. Among these variables, age was the only significant factor for the malignant character of polyps (P < 0.001 by multiple logistic regression model; Table 5).

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for malignancy

Odds ratio (95% CI)P
Age (/1 y) 1.07 (1.03-1.11) <0.001* 
Gender (male) 0.64 (0.30-1.37) 0.25 
Interval (/1 y) 1.15 (0.94-1.42) 0.18 
Follow-up time (/1 y) 0.91 (0.80-1.03) 0.13 
Initial multiplicity (/1 lesion) 0.92 (0.67-1.25) 0.58 
Initial size (/1 mm) 0.99 (0.90-1.08) 0.75 
Family history   
    None — 
    Unknown 0.67 (0.09-4.94) 0.69 
    Positive 0.90 (0.12-6.60) 0.90 
Odds ratio (95% CI)P
Age (/1 y) 1.07 (1.03-1.11) <0.001* 
Gender (male) 0.64 (0.30-1.37) 0.25 
Interval (/1 y) 1.15 (0.94-1.42) 0.18 
Follow-up time (/1 y) 0.91 (0.80-1.03) 0.13 
Initial multiplicity (/1 lesion) 0.92 (0.67-1.25) 0.58 
Initial size (/1 mm) 0.99 (0.90-1.08) 0.75 
Family history   
    None — 
    Unknown 0.67 (0.09-4.94) 0.69 
    Positive 0.90 (0.12-6.60) 0.90 

Abbreviation: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

*

Age was the only significant factor for malignant character of polyps by multiple logistic regression model.

Colorectal cancers are presumed to develop from colorectal adenomas after a long-term process of malignant transformation (6-10). Colorectal polyps discovered at a one-time colonoscopy may be chronologically heterogeneous, having arisen at various earlier ages. In the present study, we analyzed newly developed adenomas after the confirmation of the absence or complete removal of colorectal neoplasms by total colonoscopy to evaluate the malignant potential of polyps in relation to the actual age at which they developed.

The present study showed higher malignant potential of colorectal neoplasms in the old than in the young. This trend was shown even when adjusting for the size of polyps. The size is well known to be associated with the malignant character of colorectal polyps (15-17). It may suggest that the polyps on the old people are more malignant than the polyps with similar appearance on the young people. Although the trend was obscure in the lesions ≥20 mm, they might be particularly atypical lesions or missed lesions.

The malignant tendency of polyps in old people was generally stronger on the left-side colon than on the right-side colon, which is compatible with the prior literature of cross-sectional studies (17). However, at the follow-up examinations, the malignant potential of neoplasms on the right-side colon increased substantially in the old to reach the same level as that on the left-side colon. It may suggest the accelerated adenoma-carcinoma sequence or another type of carcinogenesis in the old age on the right-side colon. This may be related with our finding and those of others that the incidences of right-side colon cancers and adenomas increase with age (4, 18-20).

High malignant potential on the right-side colon resembles the cases in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Rijcken et al. (21) reported that adenomas in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients had increased susceptibility to malignant conversion than sporadic adenomas found in control patients, specifically on the right-side colon. Mechanisms similar to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer may be engaged in carcinogenesis in the right-side colon of old people (22-25).

Another notable result of this study was that the malignant potential was not associated with the lesions found at the initial colonoscopy. We and others (5, 26, 27) have reported higher incidence of metachronous colorectal adenomas in patients with larger or more advanced colorectal lesions at the initial colonoscopy. A higher incidence of overall neoplasms from the subjects with more advanced lesions at the initial examination was also shown in this study. However, the malignant potential in each polyp was not associated with the initial lesions, but highly associated with age.

The limitation of the present study is that the malignant lesions found in this study might be extraordinary, rapid-growing ones because of short intervals between colonoscopies. The question whether the majority, more slowly growing polyps, also had higher malignant potential in older people should be addressed by long-term observation or other investigational method in the future.

In conclusion, we showed in this study that the development of malignant lesions in small sizes increased on the colon or rectum at older ages. The polyps found in the old should be treated more carefully than the polyps with the same size in the young.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Office of Population Censuses and Survey. Mortality statistics, cause, 1993. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Series DH2 No. 22, 1995.
2
Haenszel W, Correa P. Cancer of the colon and rectum and adenomatous polyps. A review of epidemiologic findings.
Cancer
1971
;
28
:
14
–24.
3
Health and Welfare Statistics Association. Trends in deaths from malignant neoplasm [in Japanese].
J Health Welf Stat
2003
;
784
:
406
.
4
Okamoto M, Shiratori Y, Yamaji Y, et al. Relationship between age and site of colorectal cancer based on colonoscopy findings.
Gastrointest Endosc
2002
;
55
:
548
–51.
5
Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese.
Gut
2004
;
53
:
568
–72.
6
Morson BC. Evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum.
Cancer
1974
;
34
suppl:
845
–9.
7
Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum.
Cancer
1975
;
36
:
2251
–70.
8
Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development.
N Engl J Med
1988
;
319
:
525
–32.
9
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.
N Engl J Med
1993
;
329
:
1977
–81.
10
Kozuka S, Nogaki M, Ozeki T, et al. Premalignancy of the mucosal polyp in the large intestine. II. Estimation of the periods required for malignant transformation of mucosal polyps.
Dis Colon Rectum
1975
;
18
:
494
–500.
11
Togo G, Toda N, Kanai F, et al. A transforming growth factor β type II receptor gene mutation common in sporadic cecum cancer with microsatellite instability.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
5620
–3.
12
Togo G, Okamoto M, Shiratori Y, et al. Does mutation of transforming growth factor-β type II receptor gene play an important role in colorectal polyps?
Dig Dis Sci
1999
;
44
:
1803
–9.
13
Lynch HT, Smyrk TC, Watson P, et al. Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review.
Gastroenterology
1993
;
104
:
1535
–49.
14
Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon.
Science
1993
;
260
:
816
–9.
15
Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps.
Ann Surg
1979
;
190
:
679
–83.
16
Konishi F, Morson BC. Pathology of colorectal adenomas: a colonoscopic survey.
J Clin Pathol
1982
;
35
:
830
–41.
17
O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.
Gastroenterology
1990
;
98
:
371
–9.
18
Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld CS, Johanson JF, Rimm AA. A national population-based study of incidence of colorectal cancer and age. Implications for screening in older Americans.
Cancer
1995
;
75
:
775
–81.
19
Slattery ML, Friedman GD, Potter JD, Edwards S, Caan BJ, Samowitz W. A description of age, sex, and site distributions of colon carcinoma in three geographic areas.
Cancer
1996
;
78
:
1666
–70.
20
Gerharz CD, Gabbert H, Krummel F. Age-dependent shift-to-the-right in the localization of colorectal adenomas.
Virchows Arch A
1987
;
411
:
591
–8.
21
Rijcken FE, Hollema H, Kleibeuker JH. Proximal adenomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer are prone to rapid malignant transformation.
Gut
2002
;
50
:
382
–6.
22
Iacopetta BJ, Welch J, Soong R, House AK, Zhou XP, Hamelin R. Mutation of the transforming growth factor-β type II receptor gene in right-sided colorectal cancer: relationship to clinicopathological features and genetic alterations.
J Pathol
1998
;
184
:
390
–5.
23
Hawkins N, Norrie M, Cheong K, et al. CpG island methylation in sporadic colorectal cancers and its relationship to microsatellite instability.
Gastroenterology
2002
;
122
:
1376
–87.
24
Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K, et al. Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1998
;
95
:
6870
–5.
25
Cunningham JM, Christensen ER, Tester DJ, et al. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability.
Cancer Res
1998
;
58
:
3455
–60.
26
Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, Bhattacharyya AK, Reid ME, Alberts DS. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas.
Gastroenterology
2001
;
120
:
1077
–83.
27
Nusko G, Mansmann U, Wiest G, Brueckl W, Kirchner T, Hahn EG. Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.
Gut
2002
;
51
:
424
–8.