The relationship of vitamin D with colorectal and other cancers is a rapidly expanding field of study. The pathway through which vitamin D exerts transcriptional effects is complex and involves the action of other nutrients. Recent epidemiologic work underscores the importance of considering the joint effects of calcium and vitamin D in studies of colorectal neoplasia (1, 2). A key feature of vitamin D is its role in maintaining calcium homeostasis, which further highlights the interrelationship of these nutrients. However, the action of a vitamin A derivative, 9-cis retinoic acid and its receptor, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), has seldom been investigated in epidemiologic studies of vitamin D, despite the importance of RXR to the transcriptional activity of the vitamin D receptor (VDR; ref. 3). The intricate biological relationship among these nutrients makes it difficult to assess their individual roles in the development of colorectal neoplasia. In this commentary, we present a pathway that outlines the independent and interactive effects of nutrients that impact vitamin D activity in the colorectum. Although the pathway that we present is relatively simplified, our purpose is to highlight the various gene-nutrient relationships that should be considered when conducting studies of vitamin D and colorectal cancer. In this context, we specifically emphasize the actions of 9-cis retinoic acid and RXR, two neglected factors in this pathway. Based on these actions, we recommend that future epidemiologic investigations consider the interrelationships of these nutrients and associated genetic polymorphisms, in addition to studying the effects of each individually.

As a brief introduction to the epidemiologic data for the action of vitamin D and related nutrients, there is epidemiologic support for a protective effect of vitamin D on risk of colorectal neoplasia (2, 4); however, the data are equivocal (5). For calcium, there are a wealth of prospective and clinical data indicating that this nutrient is associated with a lower risk of colorectal neoplasia (5-7). In a clinical trial conducted by Baron et al. (6), subjects assigned to daily supplementation with calcium carbonate had a significantly reduced risk of adenoma recurrence compared with the placebo group. Further analyses of this clinical trial revealed that higher serum 25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were inversely associated with adenoma recurrence among participants in the calcium-supplemented group and not for those in the placebo group (1); this finding lends further support to the importance of the intricate biological relationship of these two nutrients to colorectal neoplasia (8). Although the role of calcium and vitamin D in colorectal carcinogenesis has been intensively investigated, the activity of 9-cis retinoic acid and RXR have not; this is in spite of the fact that RXR has been established as a component of vitamin D transcriptional activity. Nonetheless, putative protective mechanisms of action for 9-cis retinoic acid, calcium and vitamin D, and colorectal neoplasia have been proposed, as summarized in Fig. 1 and described below.

Figure 1.

The intricate relationship between the effects of vitamin D, calcium, and 9-cis-retinoic acid on tissues of the colorectum. Abbreviations: 25-OHD, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D; DBP, vitamin D binding protein; 1,25-(OH)2D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3; 9-cis RA, 9-cis retinoic acid; VDR, vitamin D receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; VDRE, vitamin D response element; CaSR, calcium sensing receptor.

Figure 1.

The intricate relationship between the effects of vitamin D, calcium, and 9-cis-retinoic acid on tissues of the colorectum. Abbreviations: 25-OHD, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D; DBP, vitamin D binding protein; 1,25-(OH)2D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3; 9-cis RA, 9-cis retinoic acid; VDR, vitamin D receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; VDRE, vitamin D response element; CaSR, calcium sensing receptor.

Close modal

Various chemopreventive properties have been suggested for calcium and include the binding of bile acids (9, 10), decreased fecal water cytotoxicity (11), inhibition of cellular proliferation (12, 13), induction of apoptosis (14), promotion of the tumor suppressor gene, E-cadherin (15), and inhibition of β-catenin (15), a proto-oncogene that has been implicated in several stages of colorectal carcinogenesis (16). For vitamin D and its analogues, the proposed mechanisms include antiproliferative effects (17), increased expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor proteins, p27Kip1 (18, 19) and p21waf1 (18, 20), promotion of colorectal carcinoma cell differentiation by induction of E-cadherin (21), and inhibition of β-catenin (16, 21). Furthermore, analogues of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3] act as inducers of apoptosis, and have shown the ability to inhibit the expression of bcl-2, a suppressor of apoptosis, in HL-60 cells (22).

Investigations of the effects of 9-cis retinoic acid in the colon have been relatively sparse. Until recently, the role of RXR as an important regulatory component has been largely overshadowed by the potent effects of its heterodimer partners, including the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ (23) and VDR (24). Nonetheless, 9-cis retinoic acid has been shown to inhibit growth of breast and bladder cancer cell lines (25, 26). In colon cancer cell lines, 9-cis retinoic acid has been shown to modify the antiproliferative response of 1,25-(OH)2D3, exhibiting an increased antiproliferative response in Caco-2 cells but blocking it in HT-29 cells (17). The reasons for these differential responses are unclear, but the data support a role for 9-cis retinoic as an important modulator of vitamin D activity. In addition to the pathways that describe the downstream biological activities induced by vitamin D, calcium, and 9-cis retinoic acid, the activity of related receptors and binding proteins for these nutrients must also be considered (Fig. 1).

The calcium-sensing receptor is necessary for the detection and maintenance of extracellular calcium levels by influencing parathyroid hormone secretion and calcium reabsorption (27). Calcium-sensing receptors may regulate the amount of calcium available to intestinal cells, and variation in the amount or activity of calcium-sensing receptors may have implications for colorectal carcinogenesis. Indeed, polymorphisms of this gene have been associated with risk of advanced stage rectal cancer (28).

The vitamin D-binding protein is important for the transport of the two major forms of circulating vitamin D, 25-(OH)D and 1,25-(OH)2D3 (29). Although this protein has been shown to be highly polymorphic, there have been few studies of its genetic variation and cancer. Following vitamin D transport to target tissues via vitamin D-binding protein, the VDR is critical to the action of 1,25-(OH)2D3 (3). After binding its ligand, VDR must heterodimerize with the RXR to exert transcriptional effects on target genes (24).

There are three isoforms of RXR (α, β, and γ), with abundant RXRα expressed in normal and neoplastic colorectal tissue (30) and colorectal cancer cell lines (17). In addition, recent investigations have indicated an important role for RXRα in colorectal pathogenesis, both independently and in conjunction with its heterodimer partners. RXR has been shown to have a role in decreasing colonic inflammation in mouse models (31). In addition, RXRα may exert chemopreventive or chemotherapeutic effects in the colon via the regulation of β-catenin (32). Dysregulation of β-catenin is a common outcome of mutations observed in colorectal cancer, resulting in higher concentrations of β-catenin and ultimately increased activation of oncogenes (32). RXR agonists have been shown to enhance interaction between RXRα and β-catenin, resulting in more efficient β-catenin degradation and subsequent antiproliferative effects (32).

Alterations in the concentration or function of the receptors, binding proteins, or ligands presented in Fig. 1 could have major implications on actions within the cell. Polymorphic variation has been observed in several nuclear receptors (33, 34), including VDR, and has been shown to affect transcriptional activity (35). In addition, VDR polymorphisms have been associated with colorectal adenoma formation (36), as well as with risk of several types of cancer (37-39), although results have been equivocal (1, 2). Recently, polymorphic variation has been described in the gene for RXRβ (34), a subtype of RXR expressed in several human tissues. As has been observed with VDR polymorphisms, variation in the gene for RXRα may elicit functional changes that are important for colorectal cancer risk. Therefore, investigations to identify the functional effects of genetic variation in RXR and its role in the vitamin D pathway will be critical to further the understanding of the mechanism of action of vitamin D.

In summary, the involvement of several nutrients and genes in altering vitamin D activity strongly indicates the need for a pathway approach to the study of its biological effects, including greater emphasis on the activity of 9-cis retinoic acid and RXR. Study of the biological effects of RXR is an especially rich area for research, given its role as a heterodimer partner for several steroid nuclear receptors (40), including peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ (23), a molecule that has itself been shown to have implications for colorectal carcinogenesis (41). We believe that examining vitamin D and/or VDR alone in epidemiologic studies, without consideration of additional key factors involved in the proposed pathway, may result in misleading or incomplete mechanisms of action. We have presented a simplified pathway to facilitate further discussion of well-known interactions among the nutrients and genes discussed. However, the vitamin D pathway is clearly more complex. Because this is a rapidly evolving field of cancer research, future studies will undoubtedly continue to uncover additional gene-gene and gene-nutrient interactions that will need to be considered along with factors proposed in the present work.

Grant support: Supported in part by the Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Gastrointestinal Cancer (CA95060), and the Colon Cancer Prevention Program Project Grant (National Cancer Institute/NIH PO1 CA41108). Dr. Jacobs is supported by a Career Development Award (1K07CA106269-01A1) from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Haussler is supported by NIH Grants DK-33351 and DK-063930.

1
Grau MV, Baron JA, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Beach ML, Church TR. Vitamin D, calcium supplementation, and colorectal adenomas: results of a randomized trial.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2003
;
95
:
1765
–71.
2
Peters U, McGlynn KA, Chatterjee N, et al. Vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin D receptor polymorphism in colorectal adenomas.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2001
;
10
:
1267
–74.
3
Haussler MR, Haussler CA, Jurutka PW, et al. The vitamin D hormone and its nuclear receptor: molecular actions and disease states.
J Endocrinol
1997
;
154
Suppl:
S57
–73.
4
Platz EA, Hankinson SE, Hollis BW, et al. Plasma 1,25-dihydroxy- and 25-hydroxyvitamin D and adenomatous polyps of the distal colorectum.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2000
;
9
:
1059
–65.
5
Martinez ME, Marshall JR, Sampliner R, Wilkinson J, Alberts DS. Calcium, vitamin D, and risk of adenoma recurrence (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
2002
;
13
:
213
–20.
6
Baron JA, Beach M, Mandel JS, et al. Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group.
N Engl J Med
1999
;
340
:
101
–7.
7
Wu K, Willett WC, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Giovannucci EL. Calcium intake and risk of colon cancer in women and men.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2002
;
94
:
437
–46.
8
Jacobs ET, Martinez ME, Alberts DS. Research and public health implications of the intricate relationship between calcium and vitamin D in the prevention of colorectal neoplasia.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2003
;
95
:
1736
–7.
9
Newmark HL, Wargovich MJ, Bruce WR. Colon cancer and dietary fat, phosphate, and calcium: a hypothesis.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1984
;
72
:
1323
–5.
10
Nagengast FM, Grubben MJ, van Munster IP. Role of bile acids in colorectal carcinogenesis.
Eur J Cancer
1995
;
31A
:
1067
–70.
11
Lapre JA, De Vries HT, Van der Meer R. Cytotoxicity of fecal water is dependent on the type of dietary fat and is reduced by supplemental calcium phosphate in rats.
J Nutr
1993
;
123
:
578
–85.
12
Lipkin M, Newmark H. Effect of added dietary calcium on colonic epithelial-cell proliferation in subjects at high risk for familial colonic cancer.
N Engl J Med
1985
;
313
:
1381
–4.
13
Pence BC. Role of calcium in colon cancer prevention: experimental and clinical studies.
Mutation Res
1993
;
290
:
87
–95.
14
Hambly RJ, Saunders M, Rijken PJ, Rowland IR. Influence of dietary components associated with high or low risk of colon cancer on apoptosis in the rat colon.
Food Chem Toxicol
2002
;
40
:
801
–8.
15
Chakrabarty S, Radjendirane V, Appelman H, Varani J. Extracellular calcium and calcium sensing receptor function in human colon carcinomas: promotion of E-cadherin expression and suppression of β-catenin/TCF activation.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
67
–71.
16
Wong NA, Pignatelli M. β-Catenin—a linchpin in colorectal carcinogenesis?
Am J Pathol
2002
;
160
:
389
–401.
17
Kane KF, Langman MJ, Williams GR. Antiproliferative responses to two human colon cancer cell lines to vitamin D3 are differently modified by 9-cis-retinoic acid.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
623
–32.
18
Scaglione-Sewell BA, Bissonnette M, Skarosi S, Abraham C, Brasitus TA. A vitamin D3 analog induces a G1-phase arrest in CaCo-2 cells by inhibiting cdk2 and cdk6: roles of cyclin E, p21Waf1, and p27Kip1.
Endocrinology
2000
;
141
:
3931
–9.
19
Wang QM, Jones JB, Studzinski GP. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 as a mediator of the G1-S phase block induced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in HL60 cells.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
264
–7.
20
Jensen SS, Madsen MW, Lukas J, Binderup L, Bartek J. Inhibitory effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) on the G(1)-S phase-controlling machinery.
Mol Endocrinol
2001
;
15
:
1370
–80.
21
Palmer HG, Gonzalez-Sancho JM, Espada J, et al. Vitamin D(3) promotes the differentiation of colon carcinoma cells by the induction of E-cadherin and the inhibition of β-catenin signaling.
J Cell Biol
2001
;
154
:
369
–87.
22
Elstner E, Linker-Israeli M, Umiel T, et al. Combination of a potent 20-epi-vitamin D3 analogue (KH 1060) with 9-cis-retinoic acid irreversibly inhibits clonal growth, decreases bcl-2 expression, and induces apoptosis in HL-60 leukemic cells.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
3570
–6.
23
Chawla A, Repa JJ, Evans RM, Mangelsdorf DJ. Nuclear receptors and lipid physiology: opening the X-files.
Science
2001
;
294
:
1866
–70.
24
Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Haussler CA. The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed.
J Bone Miner Res
1998
;
13
:
325
–49.
25
Fitzgerald P, Teng M, Chandraratna RA, Heyman RA, Allegretto EA. Retinoic acid receptor α expression correlates with retinoid-induced growth inhibition of human breast cancer cells regardless of estrogen receptor status.
Cancer Res
1997
;
57
:
2642
–50.
26
Laaksovirta S, Rajala P, Nurmi M, Tammela TL, Laato M. The cytostatic effect of 9-cis-retinoic acid, tretinoin, and isotretinoin on three different human bladder cancer cell lines in vitro.
Urol Res
1999
;
27
:
17
–22.
27
Brown EM, Pollak M, Hebert SC. The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor: its role in health and disease.
Annu Rev Med
1998
;
49
:
15
–29.
28
Speer G, Cseh K, Mucsi K, et al. Calcium-sensing receptor A986S polymorphism in human rectal cancer.
Int J Colorectal Dis
2002
;
17
:
20
–4.
29
White P, Cooke N. The multifunctional properties and characteristics of vitamin D-binding protein.
Trends Endocrinol Metabol
2000
;
11
:
320
–7.
30
Kane KF, Langman MJ, Williams GR. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and retinoid X receptor expression in human colorectal neoplasms.
Gut
1995
;
36
:
255
–8.
31
Desreumaux P, Dubuquoy L, Nutten S, et al. Attenuation of colon inflammation through activators of the retinoid X receptor (RXR)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) heterodimer. A basis for new therapeutic strategies.
J Exp Med
2001
;
193
:
827
–38.
32
Xiao JH, Ghosn C, Hinchman C, et al. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)-independent regulation of β-catenin degradation via a retinoid X receptor-mediated pathway.
J Biol Chem
2003
;
278
:
29954
–62.
33
Arai H, Miyamoto K, Taketani Y, et al. A vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in the translation initiation codon: effect on protein activity and relation to bone mineral density in Japanese women.
J Bone Miner Res
1997
;
12
:
915
–21.
34
Rajsbaum R, Fici D, Fraser PA, Flores-Villanueva PO, Awdeh ZL. Polymorphism of the human retinoid X receptor β and linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DPB1.
Tissue Antigens
2001
;
58
:
24
–9.
35
Jurutka PW, Remus LS, Whitfield GK, et al. The polymorphic N terminus in human vitamin D receptor isoforms influences transcriptional activity by modulating interaction with transcription factor IIB.
Mol Endocrinol
2000
;
14
:
401
–20.
36
Ingles SA, Wang J, Coetzee GA, Lee ER, Frankl HD, Haile RW. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of colorectal adenomas (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
2001
;
12
:
607
–14.
37
Xu Y, Shibata A, McNeal JE, Stamey TA, Feldman D, Peehl DM. Vitamin D receptor start codon polymorphism (FokI) and prostate cancer progression.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2003
;
12
:
23
–7.
38
Ikuyama T, Hamasaki T, Inatomi H, Katoh T, Muratani T, Matsumoto T. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with renal cell carcinoma in Japanese.
Endocr J
2002
;
49
:
433
–8.
39
Bretherton-Watt D, Given-Wilson R, Mansi JL, Thomas V, Carter N, Colston KW. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with breast cancer risk in a UK Caucasian population.
Br J Cancer
2001
;
85
:
171
–5.
40
Kliewer SA, Umesono K, Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM. Retinoid X receptor interacts with nuclear receptors in retinoic acid, thyroid hormone and vitamin D3 signalling.
Nature
1992
;
355
:
446
–9.
41
Sarraf P, Mueller E, Smith WM, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in PPAR-γ associated with human colon cancer.
Mol Cell
1999
;
3
:
799
–804.