To test the hypothesis that 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms modify the risk of pancreatic cancer, we conducted a hospital-based, case-control study involving 347 patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 348 healthy controls, frequency matched by age, sex, and race. MTHFR polymorphisms were determined using the PCR-RFLP method. Association of these polymorphisms with the risk of pancreatic cancer was estimated by unconditional logistic regression analysis. We found that the C667T (but not the A1298C) polymorphism had a significant main effect on the risk of pancreatic cancer. The frequencies of the MTHFR 667CC, 667CT, and 667TT genotypes were 49.5%, 38.6%, and 11.9%, respectively, among cases compared with 48.5%, 45.0%, and 6.5%, respectively, among controls. Individuals with the 667TT genotype displayed a 2-fold increased risk for pancreatic cancer compared with those with the CC/CT genotypes [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 2.14; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.14-4.01]. Multivariate analyses found that the effect of the 677TT genotype on the risk of pancreatic cancer was present among ever smokers (OR, 5.53; 95% CI, 2.0-15.3) and ever alcohol drinkers (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.30-7.69) but not in never smokers (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.33-2.06) and never drinkers (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.56-3.62). Furthermore, a positive interaction between the MTHFR TT genotype and heavy smoking or heavy alcohol consumption was detected. The OR (95% CI) of pancreatic cancer was 6.83 (1.91-24.38) for heavy smokers among the TT carriers compared with never smokers with the CC/CT genotypes and 4.23 (0.88-20.3) for heavy drinkers with the TT genotype compared with nondrinkers with the CC/CT genotypes. These observations support a role for folate metabolism in pancreatic cancer, especially among smokers and heavy drinkers.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in this country, and each year, ∼30,000 Americans die of the disease (1). In this deadly disease, the mortality rate approximately equals the incidence rate. The etiology of pancreatic cancer is poorly understood (2). High-risk populations include those with a family history of pancreatic cancer (3). Several familial syndromes with known genetic defects have been implicated, but they account for <5% of the total cases (4). The risk factors most consistently established by epidemiologic studies are age and cigarette smoking (2, 5). The protective role of a diet high in fruits and vegetables, vitamin C, and fiber has been shown in pancreatic cancer (2, 5). However, it remains unknown whether (or which) specific nutrients in fruits and vegetables account for this association.

There is growing evidence that mild folate deficiency (a low normal level) is associated with an increased risk of developing certain cancers, including in particular, colorectal cancer (6). However, the association between folate status and risk for pancreatic cancer is not clear. A cohort study of male Finnish smokers has shown a significant inverse association between the risk of pancreatic cancer and the dietary folate intake and serum folate level (7, 8). In other case-control studies, the results are equivocal, one study showed an inverse association between folate intake and pancreatic cancer (9) and the other one found no association (10). A recent report from the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study also failed to show a strong association between energy-adjusted dietary folate intake and risk for pancreatic cancer (11).

Evidence from both experimental and epidemiologic studies support the hypothesis that folate maintains DNA stability and prevents cancer (12). There are two mechanisms by which folate deficiency (caused either by low intake or abnormal metabolism) could affect the stability of DNA and increase the risk of malignancy (12). The first mechanism is through altered DNA methylation. The 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate (5-methyl THF) serves as a methyl donor in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine, which in turn is converted into S-adenosylmethionine. S-adenosylmethionine is a universal methyl donor in the methylation of DNA, RNA, and protein. As a consequence of folate deficiency, 5-methyl THF and S-adenosylmethionine are depleted, which in turn induces DNA hypomethylation and oncogene activation. The second mechanism through which folate affects DNA stability is alteration of DNA synthesis and DNA repair. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate (5,10-methylene THF) serves as a methyl donor for the conversion of uracil to thymine, which is required for DNA synthesis and repair. In folate deficiency, uracil may misincorporate into DNA, which may lead to gene mutation or DNA strand breaks (13).

Folate status is determined by both dietary folate intake and folate metabolism. Defects in folate metabolism have been linked to risk of a wide range of adverse health conditions (e.g., birth defects, cardiovascular disease, and cancer; ref. 14). Numerous genes involved in the folate metabolism pathway and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is the most extensively studied gene among all. MTHFR acts at a critical juncture in folate metabolism by catalyzing the irreversible conversion of 5,10-methylene THF to 5-methyl THF, thereby directing folate metabolites towards the DNA methylation pathway and away from the DNA synthesis pathway. Two significant functional polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene, C677T and A1298C, have been identified. The 677C-to-T transition causes an alanine-to-valine substitution in the MTHFR protein, with subsequent reduction in the enzyme activity and increase in its thermolability (15). Relative to the specific activity of MTHFR in the normal CC genotype, that of the homozygous TT genotype is reduced by ∼70%, and that of the heterozygous CT genotype is reduced by ∼35% (15). Enzyme activity is also decreased in MTHFR 1298CC homozygotes and, to a lesser extent, in the AC heterozygotes and in compound C677T and A1298C heterozygotes (16). The TT genotype has been observed to increase plasma homocysteine levels in association with low folate intake and low level of serum folate (17, 18).

The potential influence of MTHFR activity on the metabolism of methyl groups, DNA methylation, and the availability of uridylates and thymidylates for DNA synthesis and repair makes MTHFR attractive as a candidate cancer-modifying gene. Molecular epidemiologic studies have revealed that MTHFR polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer (19), gastric cancer (20), breast cancer (21), hepatocellular carcinoma (22), cervical neoplasia (23), bladder cancer (24), and indolent prostate cancer (25). Conversely, MTHFR polymorphisms have also been associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer (26-28), leukemia (29), lymphoma (30), and highly aggressive prostate cancer (25). In addition, no association has been found between the C677T variant and colon adenoma (31) and lung cancer (32). The organ site-specific effects of MTHFR on risk of cancer may be related to the tissue specific distribution of folate and different etiologic factors involved in various types of cancers. For example, the effects of MTHFR genotype seem to depend on nutrient status in colon cancer. The 677TT genotype was associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer among individuals with adequate folate intake or serum folate levels but an increased risk of colon cancer in those with low folate intake or serum folate levels (26, 27, 33). In certain types of cancers (e.g., bladder, breast, and liver cancer), the increased risk by MTHFR genotype was associated with cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption (21, 22, 24).

To the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated the role of MTHFR in pancreatic cancer in a U.S. population. We hypothesized that polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene that result in reduced enzyme activity may modify the risk of pancreatic cancer. We tested this hypothesis in a case-control study. The results showed an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with the MTHFR 667TT genotype in general and in heavy smokers and heavy alcohol drinkers in particular.

Study Subjects

This hospital-based, case-control study enrolled 347 patients with newly diagnosed, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 348 healthy controls at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 2000 to 2004. The controls were healthy, genetically unrelated family members, spouses, and friends of patients who had various types of cancers other than pancreatic. Cases were recruited from the Gastrointestinal Clinic and controls were recruited from the Diagnostic Radiology Clinic. The cases and controls were frequency-matched by age (±5 years), sex, and race. The study was approved by the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board. An informed consent was obtained from each study participant for an interview and a blood sample. Each eligible subject was interviewed to collect demographic data and information on smoking history, alcohol (ethanol) consumption, exposure history, medical history, and other risk factors. Those who had smoked >100 cigarettes in their lifetime were defined as ever smokers. Those who had consumed six alcoholic drinks per month for 6 months during their lifetime were defined as ever drinkers. The frequency of each alcoholic beverage consumed and the alcohol content of the specified portion size was used to estimate the weekly ethanol intake (g). A 12-oz can or bottle of beer, a 4-oz glass of wine, and a standard drink of liquor were considered equivalent to ∼12.0 g of ethanol (34). A blood sample was collected from each study participant.

DNA Isolation and Genotyping

DNA was extracted from peripheral mononuclear cells using the FlexiGen DNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA). The DNA was kept at −70°C until used for genotyping.

For MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphism analyses, we used the PCR-RFLP method as previously described (15).

For quality control purposes, the laboratory personnel were blinded to the case-control status of the study participants. About 10% of the samples were randomly selected for duplicate analysis, and concordant results were observed for all duplicates.

Statistical Analysis

STATA 8.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX) and SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) programs were used in statistical analysis. χ2 tests were used to compare the distribution of categorical variables and genotype frequencies between cases and controls. The observed genotype frequencies were compared with those calculated from the Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium theory (p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1, where p is the frequency of the variant allele and q = 1 − p). Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). ORs were also calculated by multivariate analysis, including variables of age (categorized by quartiles of the controls), smoking (ever versus never), drinking (ever versus never), history of pancreatitis (yes or no), type II diabetes (yes or no), and family history of pancreatic cancer (yes or no). The accumulated exposure to smoking, defined as the number of pack-years smoked, and the weekly consumption of ethanol (g) were dichotomized using the median values of controls as the cutoff points. MTHFR C667T and A1298A polymorphisms were analyzed as dichotomized variables using either the wild type or the combined wild type and heterozygous genotype as the reference category. Stratified analyses by smoking and alcohol consumption status were used to explore potential gene-environment interaction. The synergisms between genetic and environmental factors were estimated by evaluating departure from additivity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate the combined effect of genotypes and exposure (cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, heavy smoking, and heavy alcohol consumption). Heavy smokers were defined as those who smoked >20 pack-years and heavy drinkers were defined as those who consumed >86 g ethanol/wk (median value of the controls). Variables for combined effects were coded using a common referent group (e.g., never smokers with the MTHFR CC and CT genotypes). Haplotype frequencies were inferred from the genotype data by using the expectation maximization algorithm, and the haplotype effect on risk of pancreatic cancer was estimated by using the CHAPLIN computer software (35). All statistical tests were two tailed, and P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Exact test was done when appropriate.

Characteristics of the Study Subjects

The demographics and potential risk factors of 347 patients with pancreatic cancer and 348 cancer-free controls, are summarized in Table 1. The cases and controls were properly matched on sex and race but the controls were over represented in the youngest quartile age group (Table 1). The mean age ± SD was 62.1 ± 10.3 years for cases and 59.9 ± 11.5 years for controls (P = 0.01). About 88% of the cases and 89% of the controls were non-Hispanic whites, whereas Hispanics, African Americans, and other ethnic groups accounted for 12% of the cases and 11% of the controls. Ever smokers comprised 61% of the cases and 53% of the controls, which translates into a 1.5-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer among ever smokers (95% CI: 1.1-2.0). About 36% of the cases and 24% of the controls smoked >20 pack-years. Ever drinkers comprised 54% of the cases and 59% of the controls, and the difference was not statistically significant. Using the median value of ever drinkers among controls as the cutoff point, 32% of the cases and 30% of the controls consumed >86 g ethanol/wk. Other factors that were significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer included history of pancreatitis and history of diabetes (Table 1). Because some diabetes could be a manifestation of pancreatic cancer, we separated those who had a recent diagnosis of diabetes from those who had a >3-year history of the disease, and both groups showed significantly increased risk for pancreatic cancer (Table 1).

Table 1.

Selected variables of cases and controls

VariableCases, n = 347 (%)Controls, n = 348 (%)P*
Age (y)    
    ≤52 64 (18) 95 (27) 0.04 
    53-62 107 (31) 101 (29)  
    63-69 85 (24) 78 (22)  
    ≥70 91 (26) 74 (21)  
Sex    
    Male 200 (58) 202 (58) 0.91 
    Female 147 (42) 146 (42)  
Race    
    White 304 (88) 311 (89) 0.89 
    Hispanic 21 (6) 17 (5)  
    African American 17 (5) 16 (5)  
    Others 5 (1) 4 (1)  
Smoking    
    Never 134 (39) 155 (47) 0.03 
    Ever 213 (61) 177 (53)  
Pack-years of smoking    
    0-20 219 (64) 272 (76) <0.001 
    >20 125 (36) 86 (24)  
Alcohol    
    Never 160 (46) 137 (41) 0.19 
    Ever 166 (54) 195 (59)  
Weekly ethanol intake (g/wk)    
    0-86 221 (68) 231 (70) 0.43 
    >86 105 (32) 96 (30)  
Family history of cancer (first-degree relatives)    
    No 95 (28) 101 (30) 0.51 
    Yes 243 (72) 231 (70)  
Family history of pancreatic cancer (first-degree relatives)    
    No 329 (95) 335 (97) 0.13 
    Yes 18 (5) 10 (3)  
Pancreatitis    
    No 313 (90) 341 (99) <0.001 
    Yes 34 (10) 4 (1)  
Diabetes (y)    
    No 284 (83) 308 (94) <0.001 
    ≤3 21 (6) 9 (3)  
    >3 36 (11) 12 (4)  
VariableCases, n = 347 (%)Controls, n = 348 (%)P*
Age (y)    
    ≤52 64 (18) 95 (27) 0.04 
    53-62 107 (31) 101 (29)  
    63-69 85 (24) 78 (22)  
    ≥70 91 (26) 74 (21)  
Sex    
    Male 200 (58) 202 (58) 0.91 
    Female 147 (42) 146 (42)  
Race    
    White 304 (88) 311 (89) 0.89 
    Hispanic 21 (6) 17 (5)  
    African American 17 (5) 16 (5)  
    Others 5 (1) 4 (1)  
Smoking    
    Never 134 (39) 155 (47) 0.03 
    Ever 213 (61) 177 (53)  
Pack-years of smoking    
    0-20 219 (64) 272 (76) <0.001 
    >20 125 (36) 86 (24)  
Alcohol    
    Never 160 (46) 137 (41) 0.19 
    Ever 166 (54) 195 (59)  
Weekly ethanol intake (g/wk)    
    0-86 221 (68) 231 (70) 0.43 
    >86 105 (32) 96 (30)  
Family history of cancer (first-degree relatives)    
    No 95 (28) 101 (30) 0.51 
    Yes 243 (72) 231 (70)  
Family history of pancreatic cancer (first-degree relatives)    
    No 329 (95) 335 (97) 0.13 
    Yes 18 (5) 10 (3)  
Pancreatitis    
    No 313 (90) 341 (99) <0.001 
    Yes 34 (10) 4 (1)  
Diabetes (y)    
    No 284 (83) 308 (94) <0.001 
    ≤3 21 (6) 9 (3)  
    >3 36 (11) 12 (4)  
*

χ2 analysis.

Due to missing information, some cells do not add up to the number of study subjects.

MTHFR Genotypes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

The frequencies of the MTHFR polymorphisms varied among different racial groups, but none deviated significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 2). Because only a small number of study participants came from minority groups and because of the known racial variation in frequencies of the MTHFR polymorphisms, the association between MTHFR genotypes and risk of pancreatic cancer was analyzed only among 304 non-Hispanic white patients and 311 race-matched controls.

Table 2.

Racial distribution of MTHFR gene polymorphisms

GenotypeCase, n (%)Control, n (%)Variant allele frequency
P*χ2 (HWE)
CaseControl
C677T       
    White       
        CC 150 (49.5) 149 (48.5)     
        CT 117 (38.6) 138 (45.0)     
        TT 36 11.9 20 (6.5) 0.31 0.29 0.04 2.59 
    Hispanic       
        CC 10 (47.6) 5 (29.4)     
        CT 10 (47.6) 5 (52.9)     
        TT 1 (4.8) 3 (17.6) 0.29 0.44 0.31 0.09 
    African American       
        CC 11 (64.7) 12 (75.0)     
        CT 6 (35.3) 4 (25.0)     
        TT 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.18 0.13 0.52 0.33 
A1298C       
    White       
        AA 129 (42.6) 133 (42.9)     
        AC 145 (47.9) 137 (44.2)     
        CC 29 (9.6) 40 (12.9) 0.34 0.35 0.47 0.26 
    Hispanic       
        AA 13 (61.9) 10 (58.8)     
        AC 7 (33.3) 6 (35.3)     
        CC 1 (4.8) 1 (5.9) 0.21 0.24 0.98 0.01 
    African American       
        AA 12 (70.6) 9 (56.3)     
        AC 5 (29.4) 6 (37.5)     
        CC 1 (6.3) 0.15 0.25 0.48 0.00 
GenotypeCase, n (%)Control, n (%)Variant allele frequency
P*χ2 (HWE)
CaseControl
C677T       
    White       
        CC 150 (49.5) 149 (48.5)     
        CT 117 (38.6) 138 (45.0)     
        TT 36 11.9 20 (6.5) 0.31 0.29 0.04 2.59 
    Hispanic       
        CC 10 (47.6) 5 (29.4)     
        CT 10 (47.6) 5 (52.9)     
        TT 1 (4.8) 3 (17.6) 0.29 0.44 0.31 0.09 
    African American       
        CC 11 (64.7) 12 (75.0)     
        CT 6 (35.3) 4 (25.0)     
        TT 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.18 0.13 0.52 0.33 
A1298C       
    White       
        AA 129 (42.6) 133 (42.9)     
        AC 145 (47.9) 137 (44.2)     
        CC 29 (9.6) 40 (12.9) 0.34 0.35 0.47 0.26 
    Hispanic       
        AA 13 (61.9) 10 (58.8)     
        AC 7 (33.3) 6 (35.3)     
        CC 1 (4.8) 1 (5.9) 0.21 0.24 0.98 0.01 
    African American       
        AA 12 (70.6) 9 (56.3)     
        AC 5 (29.4) 6 (37.5)     
        CC 1 (6.3) 0.15 0.25 0.48 0.00 

Abbreviation: HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls.

*

χ2 analysis of frequencies between cases and controls.

For the 677 locus, the frequencies of the CC, CT, and TT genotypes were 48.5%, 45.0%, and 6.5%, respectively, among the control subjects (Table 2). The corresponding frequencies among the cases were 49.5%, 38.6%, and 11.9%, respectively. The T allele frequency was 0.31 for cases and 0.29 for controls. The TT genotype was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with the CC genotype after adjustment for age, smoking, and history of pancreatitis and diabetes (Table 3). The distribution of MTHFR A1298C genotypes did not vary significantly between cases and controls. The prevalence of the AA, AC, and CC genotypes was 42.9%, 44.2%, and 12.9%, respectively, among the controls and 42.6%, 47.9%, and 9.6%, respectively, among the cases (Table 2). The C allele frequency was 0.34 for cases and 0.35 for controls. This polymorphism showed no significant main effect on the risk of pancreatic cancer (Table 3).

Table 3.

MTHFR polymorphisms and risk of pancreatic cancer

GenotypeCase/control (n/n)Crude OR (95% CI)PAdjusted OR* (95% CI)P
C677T      
    CC 150/149 1.0  1.0  
    CT 117/138 0.84 (0.60-1.18) 0.32 0.90 (0.63-1.27) 0.54 
    TT 36/20 1.79 (1.00-3.23) 0.05 2.14 (1.14-4.01) 0.02 
A1298C      
    AA 129/133 1.0  1.0  
    AC 145/137 1.09 (0.78-1.53) 0.61 1.12 (0.79-1.60) 0.52 
    CC 29/40 0.75 (0.44-1.28) 0.29 0.77 (0.44-1.34) 0.35 
GenotypeCase/control (n/n)Crude OR (95% CI)PAdjusted OR* (95% CI)P
C677T      
    CC 150/149 1.0  1.0  
    CT 117/138 0.84 (0.60-1.18) 0.32 0.90 (0.63-1.27) 0.54 
    TT 36/20 1.79 (1.00-3.23) 0.05 2.14 (1.14-4.01) 0.02 
A1298C      
    AA 129/133 1.0  1.0  
    AC 145/137 1.09 (0.78-1.53) 0.61 1.12 (0.79-1.60) 0.52 
    CC 29/40 0.75 (0.44-1.28) 0.29 0.77 (0.44-1.34) 0.35 
*

OR was adjusted for age, smoking (ever or never), history of pancreatitis (yes or no), and history of diabetes (yes or no).

Interaction of MTHFR Genotypes with Smoking and Alcohol Consumption

Stratified analyses revealed that the 677TT genotype increased the risk for pancreatic cancer in ever smokers and ever drinkers but not in never smokers and never drinkers (Table 4). The adjusted OR (95% CI) of pancreatic cancer for TT carriers compared with that of CC carriers was 5.53 (2.00-15.3) for ever smokers versus 0.82 (0.33-2.06) for never smokers. The adjusted OR (95% CI) of pancreatic cancer was 3.16 (1.30-7.69) for ever drinkers versus 1.42 (0.56-3.62) for never drinkers. The 1298CC genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk for pancreatic cancer among ever smokers (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.85) but with a nonsignificant increased risk among never smokers (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.80-4.48).

Table 4.

Stratified analysis by smoking and alcohol

Genotype
Case n (%)
Control n (%)
Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
Case n (%)
Control n (%)
Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
Never smokersEver smokers
C677T       
    CC 63 (54) 51 (37) 1.0 87 (47) 91 (60) 1.0 
    CT 42 (36) 75 (54) 0.48 (0.28-0.84) 75 (40) 58 (36) 1.39 (0.88-2.21) 
    TT 11 (10) 13 (9) 0.82 (0.33-2.06) 25 (13) 5 (4) 5.53 (2.00-15.3) 
A1298C       
    AA 46 (40) 65 (46) 1.0 83 (44) 62 (40) 1.0 
    AC 55 (47) 62 (44) 1.26 (0.72-2.19) 90 (48) 68 (44) 1.03 (0.64-1.64) 
    CC 15 (13) 13 (10) 1.89 (0.80-4.48) 14 (8) 26 (17) 0.40 (0.19-0.85) 
       

 
Never drinkers
 
  Ever drinkers
 
  
C677T       
    CC 60 (43) 52 (43) 1.0 89 (55) 90 (53) 1.0 
    CT 65 (46) 60 (49) 1.03 (0.60-1.77) 52 (32) 73 (43) 0.77 (0.48-1.24) 
    TT 16 (11) 10 (8) 1.42 (0.56-3.62) 20 (13) 8 (5) 3.16 (1.30-7.69) 
A1298C       
    AA 61 (43) 53 (43) 1.0 68 (42) 74 (43) 1.0 
    AC 67 (48) 50 (41) 1.18 (0.68-2.06) 78 (48) 80 (46) 1.08 (0.68-1.72) 
    CC 12 (9) 20 (16) 0.60 (0.26-1.39) 16 (10) 19 (11) 0.91 (0.42-1.97) 
Genotype
Case n (%)
Control n (%)
Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
Case n (%)
Control n (%)
Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
Never smokersEver smokers
C677T       
    CC 63 (54) 51 (37) 1.0 87 (47) 91 (60) 1.0 
    CT 42 (36) 75 (54) 0.48 (0.28-0.84) 75 (40) 58 (36) 1.39 (0.88-2.21) 
    TT 11 (10) 13 (9) 0.82 (0.33-2.06) 25 (13) 5 (4) 5.53 (2.00-15.3) 
A1298C       
    AA 46 (40) 65 (46) 1.0 83 (44) 62 (40) 1.0 
    AC 55 (47) 62 (44) 1.26 (0.72-2.19) 90 (48) 68 (44) 1.03 (0.64-1.64) 
    CC 15 (13) 13 (10) 1.89 (0.80-4.48) 14 (8) 26 (17) 0.40 (0.19-0.85) 
       

 
Never drinkers
 
  Ever drinkers
 
  
C677T       
    CC 60 (43) 52 (43) 1.0 89 (55) 90 (53) 1.0 
    CT 65 (46) 60 (49) 1.03 (0.60-1.77) 52 (32) 73 (43) 0.77 (0.48-1.24) 
    TT 16 (11) 10 (8) 1.42 (0.56-3.62) 20 (13) 8 (5) 3.16 (1.30-7.69) 
A1298C       
    AA 61 (43) 53 (43) 1.0 68 (42) 74 (43) 1.0 
    AC 67 (48) 50 (41) 1.18 (0.68-2.06) 78 (48) 80 (46) 1.08 (0.68-1.72) 
    CC 12 (9) 20 (16) 0.60 (0.26-1.39) 16 (10) 19 (11) 0.91 (0.42-1.97) 
*

OR with adjustment for age, diabetes, pancreatitis, and smoking or alcohol.

A positive interaction was observed between the 677TT genotype and cigarette smoking with respect to the risk of pancreatic cancer. When using never smokers with the CC and CT genotypes as the referent, we found that light smokers (≤20 pack-years) with the TT genotype had a much higher risk of pancreatic cancer (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 0.82-9.67) compared with never smokers with the TT genotype (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.45-2.59) or light smokers with the CC or CT genotype (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.62-1.44). This interaction was even more prominent among heavy smokers. The OR (95% CI) was 6.83 (1.91-24.38) in heavy smokers (>20 pack-years) with the TT genotype and 1.67 (1.11-2.50) in heavy smokers with the CC and CT genotypes (Table 5). A similar effect was observed for heavy drinkers (weekly ethanol consumption greater than the median value for controls) with the TT genotype. Light drinkers and heavy drinkers with the TT genotype had an OR (95% CI) of 1.59 (0.59-4.27) and 4.23 (0.88-20.3), respectively, compared with never drinkers with the CC/CT genotype. A significantly reduced risk of pancreatic cancer was observed among light drinkers with the CC/CT genotypes (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.73; Table 5).

Table 5.

Interaction of MTHFR C677T polymorphisms with smoking and alcohol

C677T genotypeExposureCase/control (n/n)Adjusted OR (95% CI)*P
CC/CT Never 123/141 1.00 (reference)  
TT Never 11/13 1.08 (0.45-2.59) 0.86 
CC/CT ≤20 pack-years 76/90 0.94 (0.62-1.44) 0.79 
TT ≤20 pack-years 9/4 2.82 (0.82-9.67) 0.10 
CC/CT >20 pack-years 105/77 1.67 (1.11-2.50) 0.01 
TT >20 pack-years 18/3 6.83 (1.91-24.38) 0.003 
CC/CT Never 144/126 1.00 (reference)  
TT Never 11/8 1.02 (0.38-2.77) 0.96 
CC/CT ≤86 g/wk 51/86 0.47 (0.30-0.73) 0.001 
TT ≤86 g/wk 11/7 1.59 (0.59-4.27) 0.36 
CC/CT >86 g/wk 95/93 0.77 (0.51-1.16) 0.22 
TT >86 g/wk 9/2 4.23 (0.88-20.3) 0.07 
C677T genotypeExposureCase/control (n/n)Adjusted OR (95% CI)*P
CC/CT Never 123/141 1.00 (reference)  
TT Never 11/13 1.08 (0.45-2.59) 0.86 
CC/CT ≤20 pack-years 76/90 0.94 (0.62-1.44) 0.79 
TT ≤20 pack-years 9/4 2.82 (0.82-9.67) 0.10 
CC/CT >20 pack-years 105/77 1.67 (1.11-2.50) 0.01 
TT >20 pack-years 18/3 6.83 (1.91-24.38) 0.003 
CC/CT Never 144/126 1.00 (reference)  
TT Never 11/8 1.02 (0.38-2.77) 0.96 
CC/CT ≤86 g/wk 51/86 0.47 (0.30-0.73) 0.001 
TT ≤86 g/wk 11/7 1.59 (0.59-4.27) 0.36 
CC/CT >86 g/wk 95/93 0.77 (0.51-1.16) 0.22 
TT >86 g/wk 9/2 4.23 (0.88-20.3) 0.07 
*

Adjusted OR was adjusted for age, smoking, pancreatitis, and diabetes.

Linkage Disequilibrium and Haplotype Analysis

Among non-Hispanic whites, linkage test showed that the two loci of MTHFR 677 and 1298 were in linkage disequilibrium. The χ2 test of linkage disequilibrium gave a test statistical value of 92.2 (D′ = 0.56) for the whole study population, 15.3 (D′ = 0.34) for cases, and 103.5 (D′ = 0.80) for controls (P < 0.001). The frequencies of combined genotypes and their associations with the risk of pancreatic cancer are presented in Table 6. The only significant association, which is an inverse association, was observed for the CC-CC genotype (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.87). The frequency of the 677T-1298C haplotype was 6% for the cases and 3% for controls, and this haplotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (P = 0.01, Wald test; Table 6). Using the 677C-1298A haplotype as a referent, the 677T-1298C haplotype exerted a 3-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.38-7.7, univariate logistic regression).

Table 6.

Diplotype distribution and risk of pancreatic cancer

GenotypeReported frequency*All subjects frequencynCases frequencynControls frequencyOR (95% CI)
CC/AA 0.15 0.17 54 0.18 48 0.16 1.0 
CC/AC 0.22 0.23 77 0.26 63 0.21 1.09 (0.65-1.81) 
CC/CC 0.085 0.09 19 0.06 38 0.12 0.44 (0.23-0.87) 
CT/AA 0.22 0.20 53 0.18 67 0.22 0.70 (0.41-1.19) 
CT/AC 0.20 0.20 56 0.19 68 0.22 0.73 (0.43-1.23) 
CT/CC 0.0025 0.01 0.02 0.01 3.11 (0.62-15.7) 
TT/AA 0.11 0.06 22 0.07 15 0.05 1.30 (0.60-2.79) 
TT/AC 0.0046 0.03 11 0.04 0.02 1.96 (0.60-6.03) 
TT/CC 0.00032 0.005 0.01 Infinite 
GenotypeReported frequency*All subjects frequencynCases frequencynControls frequencyOR (95% CI)
CC/AA 0.15 0.17 54 0.18 48 0.16 1.0 
CC/AC 0.22 0.23 77 0.26 63 0.21 1.09 (0.65-1.81) 
CC/CC 0.085 0.09 19 0.06 38 0.12 0.44 (0.23-0.87) 
CT/AA 0.22 0.20 53 0.18 67 0.22 0.70 (0.41-1.19) 
CT/AC 0.20 0.20 56 0.19 68 0.22 0.73 (0.43-1.23) 
CT/CC 0.0025 0.01 0.02 0.01 3.11 (0.62-15.7) 
TT/AA 0.11 0.06 22 0.07 15 0.05 1.30 (0.60-2.79) 
TT/AC 0.0046 0.03 11 0.04 0.02 1.96 (0.60-6.03) 
TT/CC 0.00032 0.005 0.01 Infinite 
*

Reported frequency in 12,647 controls from a meta-analysis of 16 studies.

This hospital-based case-control study has shown a significant association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of pancreatic cancer in a U.S. population. Individuals carrying the homozygous TT variant genotype conferring low enzyme activity had a 2-fold increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer compared with individuals with the CC wild-type or the heterozygous CT genotype. Furthermore, interactions between the TT genotype and heavy smoking and heavy alcohol use were detected. Smokers, especially those who smoke heavily, and heavy alcohol users with the TT genotype showed a 4- to 6-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer compared with those who had either exposure alone or the variant genotype alone. These observations suggest that cigarette smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, and folate deficiency may share some common pathways contributing to pancreatic carcinogenesis. Considering the previously reported associations between the low levels of folate intake and serum folate and the risk of pancreatic cancer (7, 8), our observations support an important role of folate in the etiology of this disease.

Evidence from experimental studies support an association between folate and pancreatic disease. The pancreas contains high folate levels, second only to the liver (36). Glycine N-methyltransferase, which requires folate coenzymes in regulating the ratio of S-adenosylmethionine to S-adenosylhomocysteine, is abundant in the liver and pancreas of rats (37). Rats fed a folate deficient diet had a significantly reduced ratio of S-adenosylmethionine to S-adenosylhomocysteine, which indicates methyl donor depletion (38). The pancreas of rats fed a folate-deficient diet contained more immature secretory granules and reduced amylase secretion than the pancreas of controls (39). Some studies have suggested that the reduced pancreatic exocrine function was a result of disturbed methyl metabolism secondary to dietary folate deficiency (40, 41). A methyl (methionine and choline)–deficient diet indeed causes abnormal cellular differentiation, reduced exocrine function of the pancreas, and increased sensitivity to toxic injury and carcinogenicity in rats (42). In addition, animals treated with ethionine, an inhibitor of cellular methylation reactions, develop acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis (43) as a consequence of autolytic destruction of the pancreas (44), and chronic pancreatitis has been associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk (5).

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic determinant in gene expression, maintenance of DNA integrity and stability, chromosomal modifications, and development of mutations. Aberrant DNA methylation is observed in a nonrandom, tumor type–specific manner. In particular, certain types of tumors show regional hypermethylation of CpG islands associated with the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes, such as RB, VHL, p16INAK4A, and hMLH1 (45, 46). Furthermore, the regional hypermethylation is often associated with the inactivation of the tumor suppressor genes and hypomethylation is associated with activation of the oncogenes. Folate and methyl donor deficiency have been implicated in global DNA hypomethylation but their association with specific gene hypermethylation is not clear.

Genetic polymorphisms that decrease MTHFR activity result in the depletion of 5-methyl THF for homocysteine remethylation and the accumulation of 5,10-methylene THF, the precursor for thymidylate and purine synthesis. Although there are several studies reporting significant associations between MTHFR genotypes and gene hypomethylation in peripheral lymphocytes and in tumor tissues (47-49), other studies either found no association (50) or observed this association only in the presence of folate deficiency (51, 52). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive cancer with multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations. A previous study has shown that gene hypomethylation is a frequent epigenetic event in pancreatic cancer and is commonly associated with overexpression of the affected genes (53). Whether the detrimental effect of the homozygous MTHFR TT genotype (with much-reduced enzyme activity) on the risk of developing pancreatic cancer acts through the DNA hypomethylation mechanism needs further investigation.

We observed a clear dose-response relationship in the interaction between cigarette smoking and MTHFR 677 TT genotype in this study population. The interaction between the MTHFR polymorphism and smoking with respect to disease risk has been observed in many previous investigations. For example, cigarette smoking interacts with the MTHFR polymorphisms, resulting in an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (54, 55) and cancer of the colon (56), stomach (57), and urinary bladder (22). Smoking is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer, and we observed this risk association in the current study population. The strong interaction between heavy smoking and the MTHFR 677TT genotype observed in this study indicates that folate plays a critical role in the common causal pathway of this disease. The interaction between smoking and MTHFR polymorphism in increased risk of pancreatic cancer could be explained by two possible mechanisms: (a) Smokers may tend to have lower intake of dietary folate and lower levels of serum or tissue folate (58) and smoking is also known to interfere with the metabolism of the methyl donors (59); thus, smokers are more susceptible to the interactive effects of folate deficiency and reduced MTHFR activity, which deplete the 5-methyl THF and result in DNA hypomethylation. (b) Cigarette smoke contains many chemical carcinogens that cause DNA damage and folate deficiency has been associated with a reduced capacity for repairing DNA (60), which makes an individual more susceptible to smoking-induced DNA damage and gene mutation.

Alcohol has been found to interact with MTHFR polymorphisms in modifying the risk of colon cancer (61), breast cancer (62), and hepatocellular carcinoma (22). Although heavy users of alcohol may tend to have a diet low in fruits and vegetables, which may lead to a suboptimal level of serum folate, alcohol itself is known to decrease folate absorption, alter its metabolism, increase its excretion, and therefore deplete 5-methyl THF (63-66). In this study population, light alcohol consumption (≤86 ethanol/wk, median value of control drinkers) showed a protective effect on the risk of pancreatic cancer, whereas heavy alcohol consumption did not show any significant effect on the risk of pancreatic cancer. However, a positive interaction between alcohol and MTHFR polymorphisms was observed in the current study. Among light drinkers, the MTHFR 677CC/CT genotype was associated with a significantly decreased risk of pancreatic cancer (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.73) and, in contrast, the TT genotype was associated with a nonsignificant higher risk of pancreatic cancer (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.59-4.27). The increased risk of pancreatic cancer among the TT genotype carriers was more prominent in heavy drinkers (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 0.88-20.3). It is possible that heavy alcohol consumption may lead to folate deficiency and in the presence of the reduced MTHFR activity associated with the polymorphic gene would increase the risk of cancer by causing DNA hypomethylation.

We observed a differential effect of MTHFR 677TT and MTHFR 1298CC variants on the risk of pancreatic cancer in the current study, although both variants have been related to reduced MTHFR enzyme activities in vitro. The 677TT variant was positively associated with risk, whereas the 1298CC variant was inversely associated with risk for pancreatic cancer among smokers. This phenomenon can be explained by the observation that the MTHFR 677C allele is in linkage disequilibrium with the 1298C allele (D′ = 0.56) in this study population. Among the 69 individuals with the 1298CC genotype, 57 carried the protective 677C allele. The detrimental effect of the 677TT variant was much stronger than the protective effect of the 1298CC variant in our study. The protective effect of the 1298CC disappeared in presence of the 677T allele, whereas the effect of the 677TT variant was not affected by its combination with the 1298C allele (Table 6). The different effects of the two minor genetic variants has previously been reported in a study of prostate cancer, where the 677T variant was associated with a reduced risk and the 1298C variant was associated with an increased risk of more aggressive disease (25). As reviewed in a meta-analysis (67), the association between the 677C allele and the 1298C allele has been frequently observed in the general population. Compared with the reported frequencies of the combined genotypes in the general population by a meta-analysis (67), our study population had higher frequencies of the CC-CC, CT-CC, and TT-AC genotypes but a lower frequency of the TT-AA genotype. Furthermore, we also observed three male cancer patients with the TT-CC double homozygote, which is extremely rare in the general population. Although haplotype analysis showed a significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer for the 677T-1298C haplotype (Table 7), the Rh2 value (a measure of uncertainty) was relatively small for this haplotype compared with the Rh2 value for the other haplotypes. Thus, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Table 7.

Haplotype analysis

Haplotype
Frequency
P (Wald)*
Rh2
OR (95% CI)
CasesControls
677C-1298A 0.41 0.39 0.89 0.93 1.00 (reference) 
677C-1298C 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.92 0.81 (0.62-1.06) 
677T-1298A 0.25 0.26 0.96 0.91 0.92 (0.69-1.21) 
677T-1298C 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.66 3.26 (1.38-7.70) 
Haplotype
Frequency
P (Wald)*
Rh2
OR (95% CI)
CasesControls
677C-1298A 0.41 0.39 0.89 0.93 1.00 (reference) 
677C-1298C 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.92 0.81 (0.62-1.06) 
677T-1298A 0.25 0.26 0.96 0.91 0.92 (0.69-1.21) 
677T-1298C 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.66 3.26 (1.38-7.70) 
*

Wald, test for the haplotype effect on disease.

Rh2 is a measure of haplotype uncertainty.

Our study has two major limitations, one is the inherent limitation of the hospital-based case control design and the other is the lack of information on folate status. The relatively lower frequency of the 677TT genotype (6.5%) in our control group compared with the frequencies reported in other U.S. study populations (9-15%) may reflect a selection bias. Our controls were recruited from cancer patient companions who are not genetically related to the cancer patients. Compared with the general U.S. population, this control group has a higher prevalence of cigarette smoking and family history of cancer (Table 1). Nevertheless, the strong interaction between this genotype with heavy smoking and alcohol consumption is less likely to be explained by selection bias. Therefore, the association between the MTHFR polymorphisms and the risk of pancreatic cancer needs to be confirmed in other study populations. We have recently begun collecting dietary data using a food frequency questionnaire in our ongoing case control study. In the future, we will be able to assess the interactions among folate intake, smoking, alcohol, and MTHFR genotype.

In conclusion, our study has shown the MTHFR 677TT genotype has a significant effect on the risk of pancreatic cancer. A strong synergistic interaction of this genotype with cigarette smoking and heavy alcohol consumption was detected. Considering the facts that the previously reported association of folate intake/serum folate level and risk of pancreatic cancer was in male smokers (7, 8) and this association was not observed in studies of the general U.S. population (10, 11), additional large studies that include information on the MTHFR genotype and folate status in relation to smoking and alcohol consumption would be helpful in understanding the complex interactions of these genetic and environmental factors in pancreatic cancer. Such knowledge would have important implications for the primary prevention of pancreatic cancer.

Grant support: NIH grants CA84581, CA98380, and ES07784 and the Topfer Research Funds.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
American Cancer Society. Cancer figures and facts, 2004. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2004.
2
Anderson KE, Potter JD, Mack TM. In: Schottenfield D, Fraumenni JF Jr, editors. Pancreatic cancer in cancer epidemiology and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 725–71.
3
Lynch HT, Smyrk T, Kern SE, et al. Familial pancreatic cancer: a review.
Semin Oncol
1996
;
23
:
251
–75.
4
Hruban RH, Petersen GM, Ha PK, et al. Genetics of pancreatic cancer.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am
1998
;
7
:
1
–23.
5
Gold EB, Goldin SB. Epidemiology of and risk factors for pancreatic cancer.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am
1998
;
7
:
67
–91.
6
Kim YI. Folate and cancer prevention: a new medical application of folate beyond hyperhomocysteinemia and neural tube defects.
Nutr Rev
1999
;
57
:
314
–21.
7
Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Albanes D, Nieto FJ, et al. Pancreatic cancer risk and nutrition-related methyl-group availability indicators in male smokers.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1999
;
91
:
535
–41.
8
Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Pietinen P, Barrett MJ, et al. Dietary and other methyl-group availability factors and pancreatic cancer risk in a cohort of male smokers.
Am J Epidemiol
2001
;
153
:
680
–7.
9
Baghurst PA, McMichael AJ, Slavotinek AH, et al. A case-control study of diet and cancer of the pancreas.
Am J Epidemiol
1991
;
134
:
167
–79.
10
Silverman DT, Swanson CA, Gridley G, et al. Dietary and nutritional factors and pancreatic cancer: a case-control study based on direct interviews.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1998
;
90
:
1710
–9.
11
Skinner HG, Michaud DS, Giovannucci EL, et al. A prospective study of folate intake and the risk of pancreatic cancer in men and women.
Am J Epidemiol
2004
;
160
:
248
–58.
12
Duthie SJ, Narayanan S, Brand GM, et al. Impact of folate deficiency on DNA stability.
J Nutr
2002
;
132
:
2444
–9S.
13
Blount BC, Mack MM, Wehr CM, et al. Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1997
;
94
:
3290
–5.
14
Stover PJ. Physiology of folate and vitamin B12 in health and disease.
Nutr Rev
2004 Jun
;
62
:
S3
–12.
15
Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.
Nat Genet
1995
;
10
:
111
–3.
16
Weisberg I, Tran P, Christensen B, et al. A second genetic polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) associated with decreased enzyme activity.
Mol Genet Metab
1998
;
64
:
169
–72.
17
Rozen R. Genetic predisposition to hyperhomocysteinemia: deficiency of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR).
Thromb Haemost
1997
;
78
:
523
–6.
18
Verhoef P, Kok FJ, Kluijtmans LA, et al. The 677C->T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: associations with plasma total homocysteine levels and risk of coronary atherosclerotic disease.
Atherosclerosis
1997
;
132
:
105
–13.
19
Song C, Xing D, Tan W, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms increase risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
3272
–5.
20
Miao X, Xing D, Tan W, et al. Susceptibility to gastric cardia adenocarcinoma and genetic polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in an at-risk Chinese population.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2002
;
11
:
1454
–8.
21
Shrubsole MJ, Gao YT, Cai Q, et al. MTHFR polymorphisms, dietary folate intake, and breast cancer risk: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2004
;
13
:
190
–6.
22
Saffroy R, Pham P, Chiappini F, et al. The MTHFR 677C > T polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.
Carcinogenesis
2004
;
25
:
1443
–8.
23
Piyathilake CJ, Macaluso M, Johanning GL, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism increases the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Anticancer Res
2000
;
20
:
1751
–7.
24
Lin J, Spitz MR, Wang Y, et al. Polymorphisms of folate metabolic genes and susceptibility to bladder cancer: a case-control study.
Carcinogenesis
2004
;
25
:
1639
–47.
25
Cicek MS, Nock NL, Li L, et al. Relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C genotypes and haplotypes and prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2004
;
13
:
1331
–6.
26
Chen J, Giovannucci EL, Hunter DJ. MTHFR polymorphism, methyl-replete diets and the risk of colorectal carcinoma and adenoma among U.S. men and women: an example of gene-environment interactions in colorectal tumorigenesis.
J Nutr
1999
;
129
:
560
–4S.
27
Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, dietary interactions, and risk of colorectal cancer.
Cancer Res
1997
;
57
:
1098
–102.
28
Giovannucci E, Chen J, Smith-Warner SA, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, alcohol dehydrogenase, diet, and risk of colorectal adenomas.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2003
;
12
:
970
–9.
29
Skibola CF, Smith MT, Kane E, et al. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1999
;
96
:
12810
–5.
30
Matsuo K, Suzuki R, Hamajima N, et al. Association between polymorphisms of folate- and methionine-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to malignant lymphoma.
Blood
2001
;
97
:
3205
–9.
31
Chen J, Giovannucci E, Hankinson SE, et al. A prospective study of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and methionine synthase gene polymorphisms, and risk of colorectal adenoma.
Carcinogenesis
1998
;
19
:
2129
–32.
32
Shen H, Spitz MR, Wang LE, et al. Polymorphisms of methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2001
;
10
:
397
–401.
33
Ulrich CM, Kampman E, Bigler J, et al. Colorectal adenomas and the C677T MTHFR polymorphism: evidence for gene-environment interaction?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
1999
;
8
:
659
–68.
34
IARC. Alcohol drinking. Vol. 44. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. Lyon (France): IARC; 1988.
35
Epstein MP, Satten GA. Inference on haplotype effects in case-control studies using unphased genotype data.
Am J Hum Genet
2003
;
73
:
1316
–29.
36
Balaghi M, Horne D, Woodward S, Wagner C. Pancreatic one-carbon metabolism in early folate deficiency in rats.
Am J Clin Nutr
1993
;
58
:
198
–203.
37
Yeo E, Wagner C. Tissue distribution of glycine N-methyltransferase, a major folate-binding protein of liver.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1994
;
91
:
210
–4.
38
Balaghi M, Wagner C. Methyl group metabolism in the pancreas of folate-deficient rats.
J Nutr
1992
;
122
:
1391
–6.
39
Balaghi M, Wagner C. Folate deficiency inhibits pancreatic amylase secretion in rats.
Am J Clin Nutr
1995
;
61
:
90
–6.
40
Parsa I, Marsh W, Fitzgerald P. Pancreas acinar cell differentiation. VI. Effects of methyl donors and homocysteine.
Fed Proc
1972
;
31
:
166
–75.
41
Capdevila A, Decha-Umphai W, Song K, Borchardt R, Wagner C. Pancreatic exocrine secretion is blocked by inhibitors of methylation.
Arch Biochem Biophys
1997
;
345
:
47
–55.
42
Longnecker DS. Abnormal methyl metabolism in pancreatic toxicity and diabetes.
J Nutr
2002
;
132
:
2373
–6S.
43
Farber E, Popper H. Production of acute pancreatitis with ethionine and its prevention by methionine.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
1950
;
74
:
838
–40.
44
Niederau C, Luthen R, Niederau M, et al. Acute experimental hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis induced by feeding a choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented diet: methodology and standards.
Eur Surg Res
1992
;
24
Suppl 1:
40
–54.
45
Baylin SB, Esteller M, Rountree MR, et al. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer.
Hum Mol Genet
2001
;
10
:
687
–92.
46
Jones PA. DNA methylation errors and cancer.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
2463
–7.
47
Stren LL, Mason JB, Selhub J, et al. Genomic DNA hypomethylation, a characteristic of most cancers, is present in peripheral leukocytes of individuals who are homozygous for the C677T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2000
;
9
:
849
–53.
48
Castro R, Rivera I, Ravasco P, et al. 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C_T and 1298A_C mutations are associated with DNA hypomethylation.
J Med Genet
2004
;
41
:
454
–8.
49
Oyama K, Kawakami K, Maeda K, et al. The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and promoter methylation in proximal colon cancer.
Anticancer Res
2004
;
24
:
649
–54.
50
Narayanan S, McConnell J, Little J, et al. Associations between two common variants C677T and A1298C in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and measures of folate metabolism and DNA stability (strand breaks, misincorporated uracil, and DNA methylation status) in human lymphocytes in vivo.
Cancer Epidemil Biomark Prev
2004
;
13
:
1436
–43.
51
Friso S, Choi SW. Gene-nutrient interactions and DNA methylation.
J Nutr
2002
;
132
:
2382
–7S.
52
Friso S, Choi SW, Girelli D, et al. A common mutation in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene affects genomic DNA methylation through an interaction with folate status.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2002
;
99
:
5606
–11.
53
Sato N, Maitra A, Fukushima N, et al. Frequent hypomethylation of multiple genes overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
4158
–66.
54
Inamoto N, Katsuya T, Kokubo Y, et al. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism with carotid atherosclerosis depending on smoking status in a Japanese general population.
Stroke
2003
;
34
:
1628
–33.
55
Brown KS, Kluijtmans LA, Young IS, et al. The 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism interacts with smoking to increase homocysteine.
Atherosclerosis
2004
;
174
:
315
–22.
56
Ulvik A, Evensen ET, Lien EA, et al. Smoking, folate and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase status as interactive determinants of adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps of colorectum.
Am J Med Genet
2001
;
101
:
246
–54.
57
Gao CM, Takezaki T, Wu JZ, et al. Polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genes and the susceptibility to esophageal and stomach cancer with smoking.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
2004
;
5
:
133
–8.
58
Piyathilake CJ, Macaluso M, Hine RJ, et al. Local and systemic effects of cigarette smoking on folate and vitamin B-12.
Am J Clin Nutr
1994
;
60
:
559
–66.
59
Mannino DM, Mulinare J, Ford ES, et al. Tobaccos smoke exposure and decreased serum and red blood cell folate levels: data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Nicotine Tob Res
2003
;
5
:
357
–62.
60
Wei Q, Shen H, Wang L, et al. Association between low dietary folate intake and suboptimal cellular DNA repair capacity.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2003
;
12
:
963
–9.
61
Sharp L, Little J. Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism and colorectal neoplasia: a HuGE review.
Am J Epidemiol
2004
;
159
:
423
–43.
62
Bailey LB. Folate, methyl-related nutrients, alcohol, and the MTHFR 677C->T polymorphism affect cancer risk: intake recommendations.
J Nutr
2003
;
133
:
3748
–53S.
63
Shaw S, Jayatilleke E, Herbert V, et al. Cleavage of folates during ethanol metabolism. Role of acetaldehyde/xanthine oxidase-generated superoxide.
Biochem J
1989
;
257
:
277
–80.
64
Halsted CH, Villanueva JA, Devlin AM, et al. Metabolic interactions of alcohol and folate.
J Nutr
2002
;
132
:
2367
–72S.
65
Homann N, Tillonen J, Salaspuro M. Microbially produced acetaldehyde from ethanol may increase the risk of colon cancer via folate deficiency.
Int J Cancer
2000
;
86
:
169
–73.
66
de la Vega MJ, Santolaria F, Gonzalez-Reimers E, et al. High prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia in chronic alcoholism: the importance of the thermolabile form of the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR).
Alcohol
2001
;
25
:
59
–67.
67
Ogino S, Wilson RB. Genotype and haplotype distributions of MTHFR 677C>T and 1298 A>C single nucleotide polymorphisms: a meta-analysis.
J Hum Genet
2003
;
48
:
1
–7.