Background: Studies have examined whether tumor expression of PTGS2 (also known as COX-2), an enzyme inhibited by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin, is associated with prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. However, results to date have been mixed.

Methods: Using terms for PTGS2 and colorectal cancer, the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies published, in any language, until December 2011. Random effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled HRs [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for the association between PTGS2 expression and tumor recurrence, colorectal cancer–specific survival, and overall survival.

Results: In total, 29 studies, which had prognostic data on 5,648 patients, met the inclusion criteria. PTGS2-positive patients were at an increased risk of tumor recurrence (n = 9 studies; HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.76–4.41; P < 0.001) and had poorer colorectal cancer–specific survival (n = 7; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02–1.82; P = 0.04). However, there was funnel plot asymmetry, possibly due to publication bias, for the association with cancer-specific survival but less so for recurrence. PTGS2 expression was not associated with overall survival [(n = 16; pooled unadjusted HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.94–1.79; P = 0.11) and (n = 9; pooled adjusted HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.72–1.45; P = 0.91)].

Conclusions: PTGS2 expression was associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence and poorer colorectal cancer–specific survival but not overall survival among patients with colorectal cancer. However, confounding by tumor characteristics such as tumor stage seems likely.

Impact: There is insufficient evidence to recommend PTGS2 expression as a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer. Furthermore, studies providing adjusted results are required. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(9); 1490–7. ©2013 AACR.

Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthases (also referred to as COX) are the rate-limiting enzymes in the conversion of arachidonic acid, a product of damaged cell membranes, into prostaglandins and they exist in at least 2 isoforms, PTGS1 (COX-1), and PTGS2 (COX-2). Unlike PTGS1, which is expressed constitutively, PTGS2 expression is induced by cytokines and growth factors and is upregulated during inflammation. Among other prostaglandins, PTGS2 activation produces prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which acts on a number of cell signaling pathways involving cell proliferation, angiogenesis, apoptosis, invasion, and immunosuppression which could increase tumor progression (1).

PTGS2 has been shown to be expressed in most solid tumor types (2–5). PTGS2 upregulation seems to be particularly common in colorectal cancer, with approximately 85% of these tumors expressing PTGS2 compared with 20% of normal colorectal mucosal samples (6–8).

A large number of studies have examined the association between PTGS2 expression in colorectal tumors and patient prognosis; however, there was a large degree of heterogeneity in terms of study design, quality, and outcomes measured. Unsurprisingly, these studies have reported inconsistent findings and the nature of the association between PTGS2 expression in colorectal cancer and cancer prognosis therefore remains uncertain. This, however, is an important question as PTGS2 activity is readily modifiable by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), such as aspirin and ibuprofen, or selective PTGS2 inhibitors (COXIBs) such as celecoxib. Evidence is emerging that the use of NSAIDs, especially aspirin, may reduce risk of colorectal cancer (9–11), but few studies have examined whether the use of these drugs after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer affects disease progression and/or is dependent on tumor expression of PTGS2 (12). Some NSAIDs, particularly aspirin, may also affect tumor progression through COX-independent mechanisms (13) such as antiplatelet activity (9). NSAIDs may present a valuable treatment opportunity in colorectal cancer but the benefits need to be weighed against the risk of serious gastrointestinal bleeding associated with use of these drugs and the increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective PTGS2 inhibitors (14). Clarification of the association between tumor PTGS2 expression and colorectal cancer progression will assist in the development and targeting of therapeutic options for patients with colorectal cancer. In this article, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis of published data relating to the association between PTGS2 expression and colorectal cancer prognosis.

The aim of the study was to systematically identify all studies that analyzed the association between PTGS2 expression in colorectal tumors at diagnosis and subsequent survival and/or recurrence and to clarify the associations using meta-analyses.

Search strategy

A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify primary studies, published in any language, investigating the association between PTGS2 expression and colorectal cancer prognosis. The Embase (from 1988), Medline (from 1966), and Web of Science (from 1950) databases were searched through to December 2011, using keywords and exploded Medical Subject Headings. We used the following search strategy:

  1. (Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase.mp. or exp Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase/) or (COX-2 or Cox-ii or cyclooxygenase-2 or cyclooxygenase-ii or cyclo-oxygenase-2 or cyclo-oxygenase-ii).af.

  2. (Cancer or Cancers or neoplasm or neoplasms or tumor or tumors or tumour or tumours or carcinoma or carcinomas or adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinomas).af.

  3. (Colorectal or colon or rectum or rectal or colonic).af.

  4. 1 and 2 and 3

Eligibility criteria

The principal reviewer (A.T. Kunzmann) screened all titles and abstracts independently, whereas 4 other reviewers (L.J. Murray, M.M. Cantwell, C.M. McShane, and U.C. McMenamin) independently screened a quarter of the titles and abstracts each. In cases where the title and abstract were not sufficient for a decision to be made, the full text was acquired for further inspection. Those identified by any investigator for possible inclusion, were then independently reviewed by 2 other investigators with disagreements about inclusion settled by discussion according to the eligibility and exclusion criteria.

The eligibility criteria were that: (i) the study assessed PTGS2 expression in human colorectal tumors before commencement of radiotherapy or chemotherapy; (ii) the study assessed the relationship of PTGS2 expression with a clinically relevant prognostic outcome including overall survival, disease-free survival, colorectal/colon/rectal cancer-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and time to, or risk of, recurrence/metastasis; and (iii) the study provided sufficient statistical information, on at least one of these outcomes, to be included in a meta-analysis. Tumor regression or tumor downstaging were not included as relevant outcomes because of difficulty in precisely measuring these outcomes. Studies where all patients were classified as stage IV or Duke's D, at baseline, were excluded as these patients would all have tumors elsewhere in the body which could likely influence survival. Conference abstracts and poster presentations were also excluded. When studies had overlapping populations and reported on the same outcomes, the smaller study was excluded. Finally, the reference lists of included articles were examined for other potentially relevant articles.

Data extraction

The following data were extracted, where available, from the full text of the included articles: first author's name, year of publication, location of the study, number of participants, mean age of participants, number of males and females, primary tumor site, tumor-node-metastasis/Duke stage at enrolment, cancer treatments received, methods used to measure PTGS2 expression, antibody used [if immunohistochemistry (IHC)], number of patients with PTGS2-positive and -negative tumors, median follow-up time, survival, and/or recurrence results including reported HRs.

Statistical analysis

Stata 11 software (Stata Corporation) was used for data analysis. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to produce pooled estimates from unadjusted study results for all outcomes: recurrence (studies reporting estimates for either local recurrence only or both local and distant recurrences combined were included), distant recurrence, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Because of limited data, a separate meta-analysis using study results adjusted for various other prognostic factors, often including age, sex, tumor stage and tumor grade, was only possible for overall survival. The published HRs and confidence intervals (CI) were used where available and where these were not available, estimates of the HR and SE were produced using the indirect and survival curve methods proposed by Parmar and colleagues, (1998; ref. 15). A χ2 test for heterogeneity was calculated and the I2 statistic determined to estimate the proportion of variation between study results attributable to heterogeneity rather than chance (16). Heterogeneity was considered high if I2 statistic was above 50% (17). Because of the large heterogeneity in study design, random effects models were used. Funnel plots were produced according to the Begg and Egger methods (18, 19), and Egger tests were conducted when more than 10 studies were included in the meta-analyses, to assess the likelihood of publication bias. The trim and fill method (20) was used to estimate the overall effect sizes after adjustment for potential publication bias.

Study characteristics

The literature search yielded a total of 10,665 citations (Embase n = 4,074; Medline n = 2,273; Web of Science n = 4,318). After removal of duplicates, 6,093 potentially relevant citations remained. After application of the exclusion criteria, 29 studies remained (7, 21–45; Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S1). These studies published survival/recurrence data on 5,648 patients.

The median follow-up times reported ranged from 32.4 to 76 months. Sample sizes ranged from 42 to 871. Most studies were from Asian (n = 10) and European (n = 18) populations, with only 1 study from a North American population.

In 22 of the 29 studies, the association between PTGS2 expression and prognosis in combined colon and rectal cancer populations was reported without subgroup analysis based on tumor location. Of the remaining 7 studies, 3 studies analyzed the association in patients with rectal cancer, whereas 4 studies assessed the association in patients with colon cancer. Because of differences in outcomes reported, sensitivity analysis to investigate the association between PTGS2 expression and prognosis by tumor location was not possible. Only 5 of the 29 studies reported the results of subgroup analyses based on tumor stage, which meant that formal sensitivity analysis based on tumor-stage was not possible.

IHC was the most widely used method to assess PTGS2 expression (28/29 studies), with only one study using a PCR technique. However, the type of antibody (monoclonal or polyclonal) used for IHC differed between studies. Fourteen studies reported use of monoclonal antibodies, 6 reported use of polyclonal antibodies, and 8 studies did not report the type used. The definition of PTGS2 status also varied between studies: the majority used a combination of intensity and extent of PTGS2 staining; however, the cut-off point varied and some only used intensity or extent alone.

Association with cancer recurrence

Eight studies, including 1,577 patients, provided sufficient data (unadjusted for age, sex, and other tumor characteristics) to be included in a meta-analysis to assess the association between PTGS2 status and colorectal cancer recurrence. One study (40) provided results from a subgroup analysis based on tumor-stage. The results for each subgroup were combined using a random effects meta-analysis and the pooled estimate was added to the main meta-analysis. The pooled HR for recurrence in patients with PTGS2-positive tumors compared with patients with PTGS2-negative tumors was 2.79 (95% CI, 1.76–4.41; P < 0.001; Fig. 2A). Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 36%).

The funnel plot had minimal asymmetry (Fig. 2B). Use of the trim and fill method did not alter the result (data not shown).

Association with distant recurrence/metastasis

Five studies, including 1,010 patients, provided sufficient unadjusted data to be included in a meta-analysis to assess the association between PTGS2 status and distant recurrence/metastasis. The pooled HR for patients with PTGS2-positive tumors compared with those with PTGS2-negative tumors was 2.09 (95% CI, 0.78–5.60; P = 0.14; Fig. 2C). The I2 value was 81% suggesting a high degree of heterogeneity.

The funnel plot showed some asymmetry suggesting possible publication bias (Fig. 2D) and using the trim and fill method an attenuated estimate was obtained; (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.55–3.85; P = 0.45).

Association with disease-free survival

Nine studies, including 2,435 patients, provided sufficient unadjusted data to be included in a meta-analysis to assess the association between PTGS2 status and disease-free survival. The pooled HR for patients with PTGS2-positive tumors compared with those with PTGS2-negative tumors was 1.19 (95% CI, 0.87–1.62; P = 0.29); however, a high-degree of heterogeneity was evident (I2 = 65%; Fig. 2E).

The funnel plot was asymmetrical, suggesting publication bias is likely (Fig. 2F) and use of the trim and fill method produced an attenuated estimate HR 0.88 (95% CI, 0.63–1.22; P = 0.445).

Association with colorectal cancer–specific survival

Seven studies, including 1,768 patients, provided sufficient unadjusted data to be included in the meta-analysis assessing the association between PTGS2 status and colorectal cancer–specific survival. The pooled HR was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.02–1.82; P = 0.04) and moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 41%; Fig. 2G).

The funnel plot was asymmetrical suggesting publication bias is possible (Fig. 2H) and use of the trim and fill method, which imputed 3 values, attenuated the estimate HR to 1.10 (95% CI, 0.80–1.51; P = 0.599).

Association with overall survival

Sixteen studies, including 3,657 patients, provided sufficient unadjusted data to be included in a meta-analysis assessing the association between PTGS2 status and overall survival. The I2 value was 77% suggesting heterogeneity was large. The estimated pooled HR was 1.30 (95% CI, 0.94–1.79; P = 0.11; Fig. 2I).

The funnel plot showed asymmetry and the Egger test was statistically significant (t = 2.96, P = 0.01), indicative of publication bias (Fig. 2J). Use of the trim and fill method changed the estimate HR to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.69–1.36; P = 0.87).

Nine studies, involving 2,121 patients, provided overall survival estimates adjusted for age, sex, and various tumor characteristics (see Table 1 for adjustments). This estimated the pooled HR as 1.02 (95% CI, 0.72–1.45; P = 0.91; Fig. 2K). The I2 value was 63% suggesting heterogeneity was large.

Funnel plot asymmetry was hard to gauge (Fig. 2L) as only large studies tended to publish adjusted analyses but use of the trim and fill method moved the estimate for overall survival from adjusted study results to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.63–1.35; P = 0.67).

This systematic review with meta-analyses has shown that tumor PTGS2 expression is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and poorer colorectal cancer–specific survival. However, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis of estimates for risk of cancer recurrence and cancer-specific survival that adjusted for other prognostic factors such as tumor stage. Adjustment for potential publication bias also meant the association with colorectal cancer–specific survival was no longer observed. In addition, PTGS2 expression was not associated with overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer, especially after adjustment for age, sex, and other tumor characteristics. Therefore, from summation of the existing literature, it remains unclear whether there is any independent association between tumor PTGS2 expression and colorectal cancer progression.

Patients with tumors that express PTGS2 were at an increased risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and colorectal cancer–specific survival when unadjusted estimates from 9 and 7 studies, respectively, were pooled. The trim and fill method showed that the results for recurrence were unlikely due to publication bias, as the results were unchanged using this additional method (46). However, the estimate for colorectal cancer–specific survival could be subject to publication bias based on asymmetry of the funnel plot and a lack of statistical significance after using the trim and fill method.

The apparent associations between PTGS2 expression and risk of recurrence and colorectal cancer–specific survival could result from confounding by other prognostic tumor characteristics such as tumor stage and tumor grade. This is particularly important as a number of studies in the current review found associations between PTGS2 expression and tumor stage/grade (8, 30, 33, 36–38, 42, 44, 47) which could reflect a causal effect of tumor stage, or an associated factor on PTGS2 expression. Conversely, however, it could indicate that increased tumor stage is caused by increased PTGS2 expression in which case adjustment for stage would not be appropriate. Nevertheless, too few studies provided adjusted analyses to adequately assess any potential confounding. This prevents a definitive conclusion as to whether there is an independent association between PTGS2 and recurrence or colorectal cancer–specific survival from being made.

Despite the increased risk of recurrence and reduced colorectal cancer–specific survival among patients with PTGS2-positive tumors, patients do not seem to be at an increased risk of either overall survival or disease-free survival. This was particularly apparent for overall survival when pooling study results that were adjusted for other prognostic characteristics such as age, sex, tumor stage, and tumor grade. Publication bias also seemed apparent and adjustment for this using the trim and fill method moved the estimates for both overall survival and disease-free survival closer to 1. A number of studies (48–51) identified in the search, which met the first two inclusion criteria, but did not provide sufficient information to be included in the meta-analysis, reported that the results were non–statistically significant which provides further support that reporting bias, a form of publication bias, had occurred. The moderate to large degree of heterogeneity among studies for each of the outcomes measured indicates that PTGS2 expression may be of prognostic value under certain conditions, but not others. These conditions may differ based on the use of different antibodies to assess PTGS2 expression or differences in the composition of each study population based on ethnicity, gender, stage of disease, or tumor locations. The cut-off point used by studies to determine PTGS2 positivity may also be important. Altering the cut-off point used to determine positive expression could alter both the strength and direction of the association between PTGS2 positivity and survival (24). However, due to the limited number of studies included, which separated participants based on these factors, sensitivity analyses could not be conducted. Furthermore, studies comparing the effects in different subgroups would be useful to identify subgroups where PTGS2 expression may have prognostic value.

The measures of PTGS2 expression at surgery or biopsy may also not reflect PTGS2 expression in cells remaining after surgery for 2 reasons. First, as PTGS2 expression is inducible by cytokines and surgery may cause a large degree of inflammation (16), accurate classification of a patients' level of PTGS2 expression from samples taken at this time may be difficult. Second, PTGS2 expression in tumor cells remaining after surgery may also be altered by radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatments received after samples were taken (52, 53). This would mean the measure of PTGS2 expression at surgery or biopsy may not reflect a patients' PTGS2 expression throughout the whole postsurgery period.

Although adjustment for confounding by tumor characteristics may move the estimates closer to null, adjustment for the use of NSAIDs may also move the estimate, but in the opposite direction. Postdiagnostic use of NSAIDs such as aspirin may be common, for example, 8% to 43% of patients with colorectal cancer in the VICTOR trial and Nurses' Health study were classed as aspirin users, respectively (12, 31). The Nurses' Health study also found that PTGS2 expression might be needed for aspirin to affect survival in patients with colorectal cancer (12). Therefore, aspirin use may selectively improve survival among patients with PTGS2-positive tumors and thus mask any association between PTGS2 expression and survival.

Cancer survival may be influenced by a number of interacting molecular pathways. PTGS2 expression is associated with the expression of a number of potentially prognostic signaling proteins, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase and protein 53 (54, 55). PTGS2 is also inversely associated with the presence of microsatellite instabilities (MSI; 54, 56), which itself seems to be associated with improved survival (57, 58) and could therefore mask an association between PTGS2 and survival. Only one study within this review adjusted for MSI status (7) and found that this adjustment strengthened the association between PTGS2 and survival. Therefore, it could be speculated that the association between PTGS2 and survival observed in this review would be stronger if more studies had adjusted for MSI status. Studies testing coexpression of multiple biomarkers have also found evidence of synergistic or antagonistic effects between PTGS2 and other biomarkers on survival (7, 33). Therefore, assessment of multiple molecular pathways may allow better adjustment for confounding and may also allow a better determination of prognosis than measurement of any individual marker alone.

Systematic reviews rely on the quality of the primary studies within the existing literature. Unfortunately, the majority of the studies eligible for this review had small sample sizes which likely precluded adjustment for potential confounders and increased the risk of publication or reporting bias. More larger-scale studies, that individually have sufficient power to adjust for potential confounders, would be more useful as they would better allow the true independent association to be determined.

It has been hypothesized that NSAIDs such as aspirin may improve survival among patients with colorectal cancer and that this effect may be mediated by the inhibition of PTGS2 expression in the tumor. The inconsistency of the current results means they neither support nor refute this hypothesis. It is also possible that NSAIDs may improve survival via alternative biologic mechanisms, including antiplatelet activity. Recent studies suggest that low-dose aspirin may improve survival among patients with colorectal cancer (12, 59), despite the selectivity of the inhibition of PTGS to platelets at these doses (60).

In summary, due to the inconsistent results between outcomes and insufficient data from studies adjusting for relevant prognostic indicators, it is unclear from the current literature whether PTGS2 expression has an independent association with prognosis. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to recommend prognostic testing of PTGS2 expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Furthermore, better designed studies using larger sample sizes and conducting adjusted analyses are needed.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: A.T. Kunzmann, L.J. Murray, M.M. Cantwell

Development of methodology: A.T. Kunzmann, L.J. Murray, M.M. Cantwell

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): A.T. Kunzmann, L.J. Murray

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): A.T. Kunzmann, L.J. Murray, C.R. Cardwell, M.M. Cantwell

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A.T. Kunzmann, L.J. Murray, C.R. Cardwell, C.M. McShane, M.M. Cantwell

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): A.T. Kunzmann, L.J. Murray, C.M. McShane, Ú.C. McMenamin

Study supervision: L.J. Murray, M.M. Cantwell

The work was supported by the Centre of Excellence for Public Health (Northern Ireland; to A.T. Kunzmann), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research United Kingdom, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, Research and Development Office for the Northern Ireland Health and Social Services, and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration.

1.
Wang
D
,
DuBois
RN
. 
Prostaglandins and cancer
.
Gut
2006
;
55
:
115
22
.
2.
Ristimäki
A
,
Honkanen
N
,
Jänkälä
H
,
Sipponen
P
,
Härkönen
M
. 
Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human gastric carcinoma
.
Cancer Res
1997
;
57
:
1276
80
.
3.
Soslow
RA
,
Dannenberg
AJ
,
Rush
D
,
Woerner
BM
,
Khan
KN
,
Masferrer
J
, et al
COX-2 is expressed in human pulmonary, colonic, and mammary tumors
.
Cancer
2000
;
89
:
2637
45
.
4.
Yip-Schneider
MT
,
Barnard
DS
,
Billings
SD
,
Cheng
L
,
Heilman
DK
,
Lin
A
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinomas
.
Carcinogenesis
2000
;
21
:
139
46
.
5.
Lee
LM
,
Pan
CC
,
Cheng
CJ
,
Chi
CW
,
Liu
TY
. 
Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in prostate adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia
.
Anticancer Res
2001
;
21
:
1291
4
.
6.
Eberhart
CE
,
Coffey
RJ
,
Radhika
A
,
Giardiello
FM
,
Ferrenbach
S
,
DuBois
RN
. 
Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas
.
Gastroenterology
1994
;
107
:
1183
8
.
7.
Ogino
S
,
Kirkner
GJ
,
Nosho
K
,
Irahara
N
,
Kure
S
,
Shima
K
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in colon cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2008
;
14
:
8221
7
.
8.
Zhang
H
,
Sun
X
. 
Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 correlates with advanced stages of colorectal cancer
.
Am J Gastroenterol
2002
;
97
:
1037
41
.
9.
Rothwell
PM
,
Price
JF
,
Fowkes
FGR
,
Zanchetti
A
,
Roncaglioni
MC
,
Tognoni
G
, et al
Short-term effects of daily aspirin on cancer incidence, mortality, and non-vascular death: analysis of the time course of risks and benefits in 51 randomised controlled trials
.
Lancet
2012
;
379
:
1602
12
.
10.
Rothwell
PM
,
Wilson
M
,
Elwin
CE
,
Norrving
B
,
Algra
A
,
Warlow
CP
, et al
Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials
.
Lancet
2010
;
376
:
1741
50
.
11.
Rostom
A
,
Dube
C
,
Lewin
G
,
Tsertsvadze
A
,
Barrowman
N
,
Code
C
, et al
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a systematic review prepared for the U.S. preventive services task force
.
Ann Intern Med
2007
;
146
:
376
89
.
12.
Chan
AT
,
Ogino
S
,
Fuchs
CS
. 
Aspirin use and survival after diagnosis of colorectal cancer
.
JAMA
2009
;
302
:
649
58
.
13.
Chuang
H
,
Kardosh
A
,
Gaffney
K
,
Petasis
N
,
Schönthal
A
. 
COX-2 inhibition is neither necessary nor sufficient for celecoxib to suppress tumor cell proliferation and focus formation in vitro
.
Mol Cancer
2008
;
7
:
1
13
.
14.
Seshasai
S
,
Wijesuriya
S
,
Sivakumaran
R
,
Nethercott
S
,
Erqou
S
,
Sattar
N
, et al
Effect of aspirin on vascular and nonvascular outcomes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
.
Arch Intern Med
2012
;
172
:
209
16
.
15.
Parmar
MKB
,
Torri
V
,
Stewart
L
. 
Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints
.
Stat Med
1998
;
17
:
2815
34
.
16.
Hewitt
P
,
Ip
S
,
Kwok
S
,
Somers
SS
,
Li
K
,
Leung
KL
, et al
Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer
.
Dis Colon Rectum
1998
;
41
:
901
9
.
17.
Higgins
JP
,
Thompson
SG
,
Deeks
JJ
,
Altman
DG
. 
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
.
BMJ
2003
;
327
:
557
60
.
18.
Begg
CB
,
Mazumdar
M
. 
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
.
Biometrics
1994
;
50
:
1088
101
.
19.
Egger
M
,
Davey Smith
G
,
Schneider
M
,
Minder
C
. 
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
.
BMJ
1997
;
315
:
629
34
.
20.
Duval
S
,
Tweedie
R
. 
Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot?based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis
.
Biometrics
2000
;
56
:
455
63
.
21.
Buecher
B
,
Heymann
MF
,
Lievre
A
,
Nguyen
JM
,
Wilson
K
,
Bézieau
S
, et al
Cyclo-oxygenase-2 over-expression in sporadic colorectal carcinoma without lymph node involvement
.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
2003
;
18
:
731
40
.
22.
Chen
S
,
Liu
J
,
Li
G
,
Mo
F
,
Xu
X
,
Zhang
T
, et al
Altered distribution of beta-catenin and prognostic roles in colorectal carcinogenesis
.
Scand J Gastroenterol
2008
;
43
:
456
64
.
23.
de Heer
P
,
Gosens
MJ
,
de Bruin
EC
,
Dekker-Ensink
NG
,
Putter
H
,
Marijnen
CA
, et al
Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in rectal cancer is of prognostic significance in patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy
.
Clin Cancer Res
2007
;
13
:
2955
60
.
24.
Fux
R
,
Schwab
M
,
Thon
KP
,
Gleiter
CH
,
Fritz
P
. 
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human colorectal cancer is unrelated to overall patient survival
.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
4754
60
.
25.
Giralt
J
,
Navalpotro
B
,
Hermosilla
E
,
de Torres
I
,
Espin
E
,
Reyes
V
, et al
Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor and cyclooxygenase-2 in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy
.
Oncology
2007
;
71
:
312
9
.
26.
Huh
JW
,
Kim
HR
,
Lee
JH
,
Kim
YJ
. 
Comparison of cyclooxygenase-2 and CD44 mRNA expression in colorectal cancer and its relevance for prognosis
.
Virchows Archiv
2009
;
454
:
381
7
.
27.
Inafuku
Y
,
Furuhata
T
,
Tayama
M
,
Okita
K
,
Nishidate
T
,
Mizuguchi
T
, et al
Matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression in stromal tissues is a consistent prognostic factor in stage II colon cancer
.
Cancer Sci
2009
;
100
:
852
8
.
28.
Jimenez-Anula
J
,
Luque
RJ
,
Gaforio
JJ
,
Delgado
M
. 
[Cyclooxygenase-2 expression as a prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancer]
.
Cirugia Espanola
2005
;
78
:
39
44
.
29.
Joo
Y
,
Kim
H
,
Min
S
,
Lee
WS
,
Park
CH
,
Park
CS
, et al
Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 protein in colorectal carcinomas
.
Int J Gastrointest Cancer
2002
;
31
:
147
54
.
30.
Masunaga
R
,
Kohno
H
,
Dhar
DK
,
Ohno
S
,
Shibakita
M
,
Kinugasa
S
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression correlates with tumor neovascularization and prognosis in human colorectal carcinoma patients
.
Clin Cancer Res
2000
;
6
:
4064
8
.
31.
Midgley
RS
,
McConkey
CC
,
Johnstone
EC
,
Dunn
JA
,
Smith
JL
,
Grumett
SA
, et al
Phase III randomized trial assessing rofecoxib in the adjuvant setting of colorectal cancer: final results of the VICTOR trial
.
J Clin Oncol
2010
;
28
:
4575
80
.
32.
Tomozawa
S
,
Tsuno
N
,
Sunami
E
,
Hatano
K
,
Kitayama
J
,
Osada
T
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression correlates with tumour recurrence, especially haematogenous metastasis, of colorectal cancer
.
Br J Cancer
2000
;
83
:
324
8
.
33.
Peng
ZH
,
Wan
DS
,
Li
LR
,
Chen
G
,
Lu
ZH
,
Wu
XJ
, et al
Expression of COX-2, MMP-2, and VEGF in stage II and III colorectal cancer and the clinical significance
.
Hepatogastroenterology
2011
;
58
:
369
76
.
34.
Petersen
S
,
Haroske
G
,
Hellmich
G
,
Ludwig
K
,
Petersen
C
,
Eicheler
W
. 
COX-2 epression in rectal carcinoma: immunohistochemical pattern and clinical outcome
.
Anticancer Res
2002
;
22
:
1225
30
.
35.
Ong
CW
,
Kim
LG
,
Kong
HH
,
Low
LY
,
Iacopetta
B
,
Soong
R
, et al
CD133 expression predicts for non-response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer
.
Mod Pathol
2010
;
23
:
450
7
.
36.
Pancione
M
,
Forte
N
,
Sabatino
L
,
Tomaselli
E
,
Parente
D
,
Febbraro
A
, et al
Reduced beta-catenin and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- expression levels are associated with colorectal cancer metastatic progression: correlation with tumor-associated macrophages, cyclooxygenase 2, and patient outcome
.
Hum Pathol
2009
;
40
:
714
25
.
37.
Soumaoro
LT
,
Uetake
H
,
Higuchi
T
,
Takagi
Y
,
Enomoto
M
,
Sugihara
K
. 
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression: a significant prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
8465
71
.
38.
Sheehan
KM
,
Sheahan
K
,
O'Donoghue
DP
,
MacSweeney
F
,
Conroy
RM
,
Fitzgerald
DJ
, et al
The relationship between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and colorectal cancer
.
JAMA
1999
;
282
:
1254
7
.
39.
Sundov
Z
,
Kunac
N
,
Capkun
V
,
Kalebić
M
,
Druzijanić
N
,
Puljak
L
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 in dukes B colon cancer
.
Hepatogastroenterology
2011
;
58
:
763
768
.
40.
Wan
XB
,
Pan
ZZ
,
Ren
YK
,
Ding
PR
,
Chen
G
,
Wan
DS
. 
[Expression and clinical significance of metastasis-related tumor markers in colorectal cancer]
.
Aizheng
2009
;
28
:
950
4
.
41.
Yamauchi
T
,
Watanabe
M
,
Kubota
T
,
Hasegawa
H
,
Ishii
Y
,
Endo
T
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression as a new marker for patients with colorectal cancer
.
Dis Colon Rectum
2002
;
45
:
98
103
.
42.
Yamac
D
,
Celenkoglu
G
,
Coskun
U
,
Akyurek
N
,
Akcali
Z
,
Dursun
A
, et al
Prognostic importance of COX-2 expression in patients with colorectal cancer
.
Pathol Res Pract
2005
;
201
:
497
502
.
43.
Wu
A
,
Gu
J
,
Ji
J
,
Li
Z
,
Xu
G
. 
Role of COX-2 in carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer and its relationship with tumor biological characteristics and patients' prognosis
.
World J Gastroenterol
2003
;
9
:
1990
4
.
44.
Lim
SC
,
Lee
TB
,
Choi
CH
,
Ryu
SY
,
Min
YD
,
Kim
KJ
. 
Prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 expression and nuclear p53 accumulation in patients with colorectal cancer
.
J Surg Oncol
2008
;
97
:
51
6
.
45.
Zhou
ZG
,
Wu
XJ
,
Li
LR
,
Peng
ZH
,
Ding
PR
,
Wang
RJ
, et al
A multivariate analysis of prognostic determinants for stages II and III colorectal cancer in 141 patients
.
Chin Med J
2011
;
124
:
2132
5
.
46.
Rosenthal
R
. 
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
.
Psychol Bull
1979
;
86
:
638
.
47.
Jang
SM
,
Jun
YJ
,
Na
Woong
,
Jang
SH
,
Min
KW
,
Song
YS
, et al
Clinicopathologic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression in colorectal adenocarcinoma
.
Basic Appl Pathol
2010
;
3
:
14
20
.
48.
Cahlin
C
,
Lonnroth
C
,
Arvidsson
A
,
Nordgren
S
,
Lundholm
K
. 
Growth associated proteins in tumor cells and stroma related to disease progression of colon cancer accounting for tumor tissue PGE2 content
.
Int J Oncol
2008
;
32
:
909
18
.
49.
Denkert
C
,
Koch
I
,
Von Keyserlingk
N
,
Noske
A
,
Niesporek
S
,
Dietel
M
, et al
Expression of the ELAV-like protein HuR in human colon cancer: association with tumor stage and cyclooxygenase-2
.
Mod Pathol
2006
;
19
:
1261
9
.
50.
El-Serafi
MM
,
Bahnassy
AA
,
Ali
NM
,
Eid
SM
,
Kamel
MM
,
Abdel-Hamid
NA
, et al
The prognostic value of c-kit, K-ras codon 12, and p53 codon 72 mutations in egyptian patients with stage II colorectal cancer
.
Cancer
2010
;
116
:
4954
64
.
51.
Debucquoy
A
,
Libbrecht
L
,
Roobrouck
V
,
Goethals
L
,
McBride
W
,
Haustermans
K
. 
Morphological features and molecular markers in rectal cancer from 95 patients included in the european organisation for research and treatment of cancer 22921 trial: prognostic value and effects of preoperative radio (chemo) therapy
.
Eur J Cancer
2008
;
44
:
791
7
.
52.
Watwe
V
,
Javle
M
,
Lawrence
D
,
Groth
J
,
Iyer
R
,
El-Hajjar
D
, et al
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels before and after chemotherapy: a study in rectal cancer
.
Am J Clin Oncol
2005
;
28
:
560
4
.
53.
Debucquoy
A
,
Roels
S
,
Goethals
L
,
Libbrecht
L
,
Van Cutsem
E
,
Geboes
K
, et al
Double blind randomized phase II study with radiation + 5-fluorouracil +/− celecoxib for resectable rectal cancer
.
Radiother Oncol
2009
;
93
:
273
8
.
54.
Ogino
S
,
Brahmandam
M
,
Kawasaki
T
,
Kirkner
GJ
,
Loda
M
,
Fuchs
CS
. 
Combined analysis of COX-2 and p53 expressions reveals synergistic inverse correlations with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer
.
Neoplasia
2006
;
8
:
458
64
.
55.
Liao
X
,
Lochhead
P
,
Nishihara
R
,
Morikawa
T
,
Kuchiba
A
,
Yamauchi
M
, et al
Aspirin use, tumor PIK3CA mutation, and colorectal-cancer survival
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
367
:
1596
606
.
56.
Karnes
WE
 Jr
,
Shattuck-Brandt
R
,
Burgart
LJ
,
DuBois
RN
,
Tester
DJ
,
Cunningham
JM
, et al
Reduced COX-2 protein in colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair
.
Cancer Res
1998
;
58
:
5473
7
.
57.
Popat
S
,
Hubner
R
,
Houlston
RS
. 
Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis
.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
609
18
.
58.
Funkhouser
WK
 Jr
,
Lubin
IM
,
Monzon
FA
,
Zehnbauer
BA
,
Evans
JP
,
Ogino
S
, et al
Relevance, pathogenesis, and testing algorithm for mismatch repair-defective colorectal carcinomas: a report of the association for molecular pathology
.
J Mol Diagn
2012
;
14
:
91
103
.
59.
McCowan
C
,
Munro
AJ
,
Donnan
PT
,
Steele
RJC
. 
Use of aspirin post-diagnosis in a cohort of patients with colorectal cancer and its association with all-cause and colorectal cancer specific mortality
.
Eur J Cancer
2013
;
49
:
1049
57
.
60.
Patrignani
P
,
Filabozzi
P
,
Patrono
C
. 
Selective cumulative inhibition of platelet thromboxane production by low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects
.
J Clin Invest
1982
;
69
:
1366
72
.