Cigarette smoking is the major cause of bladder cancer. Constituents in tobacco smoke can induce oxidative DNA damage requiring base excision repair. The Arg399Gln polymorphism in the DNA base excision repair gene XRCC1 is associated with several phenotypic markers of reduced DNA repair capacity. Results from several epidemiologic studies suggest that the Arg399Gln polymorphism may influence susceptibility to several cancers including bladder cancer; however, data from large population-based studies are lacking. In a population-based case-control study from New Hampshire, we observed a reduced risk among those homozygous for the Arg399GlnXRCC1 variant polymorphism compared with those with one or two wild-type alleles (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.4-1.0). There was no indication of a gene-environment interaction between cigarette smoking and the variant genotype. Our data are consistent with a potential role of the XRCC1Arg399Gln polymorphism in bladder cancer susceptibility and further suggest that there may be DNA lesions important in bladder carcinogenesis, repaired by the base excision repair mechanism, that are not directly associated with tobacco smoking.

In addition to aryl amines, tobacco smoke contains compounds such as 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, catechol, and hydroquinone that generate free radicals and induce oxidative damage to DNA (1, 2). Consequently, constitutional variation in an individual's ability to repair DNA base damage may confer differential risk for smoking-related bladder cancer. Of potential importance is XRCC1, an abundant nuclear zinc finger protein that is part of a DNA binding protein complex. Although the XRCC1 protein has no enzymatic activity, it interacts with key enzymes involved in base excision repair including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (3), DNA polymerase β (3, 4), DNA ligase III, and AP endonuclease (APE1), a rate-limiting enzyme in base excision repair (5). Therefore, polymorphisms causing amino acid substitutions may impair the interaction of XRCC1 with the other enzymatic proteins and hence alter base excision repair activity.

Human XRCC1 maps to chromosome 19q13.2 (6) and is composed of 17 exons (7). An exon 10 variant at codon 399 (8) leads to an Arg-to-Gln amino acid change and has been associated with several phenotypic alterations including higher levels of aflatoxin B1-DNA adducts, glycophorin A mutations (9), and polyphenol DNA adducts (10) in human tissues. Among current smokers, those with the homozygote variant genotype (Gln/Gln) had an increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral blood lymphocytes compared with the heterozygote or homozygote wild-type individuals (10). Several previous epidemiologic studies reported altered cancer risks associated with the Arg399GlnXRCC1 polymorphism; in particular, two reports from hospital-based studies observed a lower prevalence of the homozygous variant genotype among bladder cancer cases than controls (11, 12), and a third hospital-based study (13) noted this trend among heavy smokers. However, a recent hospital-based study from Sweden found no association with the XRCC1Arg399Gln genotype, but data were not consistently available on smoking history; thus, gene-environment interactions were not examined (14). Therefore, we investigated the possible role of the Arg399GlnXRCC1 polymorphism and its potential interaction with cigarette smoking on the risks of bladder cancer in a population-based study.

Study Population

We identified bladder cancer cases from the New Hampshire State Cancer Registry where an initial report of cancer is required within 15 days of diagnosis. This study includes incident cases of bladder cancer diagnosed between July 1, 1994 and March 31, 1998. Controls are randomly selected from drivers' license records (for those ages <65 years) and from Medicare enrollment files (for those ages >65 years). All study participants are restricted by residency (New Hampshire), accessibility (having a telephone), language (English speaking), and age (25 to 74 years).

A total of 459 bladder cancer cases and 665 controls were interviewed; 85% of cases and 70% of controls were confirmed to be eligible for the study. Reasons for nonparticipation included physician's denial to contact their patient (10 cases); deceased (63 cases and 18 controls); no answer after 40 attempts distributed over days, evenings, and weekends (3 cases and 17 controls); refusal (75 cases and 261 controls); and mentally incompetent or too ill to take part (8 cases and 29 controls). We compared study participants and nonparticipants with regard to age, sex, and residence in an urban area. Both groups seem to be similar with regard to these factors. We shared a control group with a study of nonmelanoma skin cancer conducted covering a diagnostic period from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1995 (15). We selected additional controls for bladder cancer cases diagnosed between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1997 frequency matched to these cases on age (25 to 34, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 69, or 70 to 74 years) and gender.

Potential subjects were informed about the aims and requirements of the study, and informed consent for participation was obtained in accordance with institutional guidance at Dartmouth Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health. For >95% of participants, the interview was conducted in-person, usually at the subject's home; if a subject refused an in-person interview, it was conducted by telephone. Interviewers were masked to the study hypotheses and the case-control status of the participant. All interviewers underwent extensive training, and interviews were tape recorded for quality control purposes. Data were gathered regarding residence, occupational history, drinking water supply, demographic information, tobacco smoking, use of hair dyes, medical and family history of cancer, coffee consumption, and socioeconomic status.

A standardized histopathology review was conducted by the study pathologist, and from this review, we excluded 11 subjects who were initially reported to the cancer registry as having bladder cancer. Of the remaining cases, blood samples were available on 355 (79%) cases. A total of 558 (84%) controls provided a blood sample. Fourteen samples had missing data for XRCC1 genotype due to PCR failure after duplicate attempts, leaving 355 cases and 544 controls for the analysis. Non-Hispanic Whites comprised 96.7% (n = 868) of the population studied; <1% of subjects reported their race/ethnicity as Hispanic (n = 5), Black (n = 1), American Indian (n = 7), or Asian (n = 1), and ∼2% identified themselves as in the Other race/ethnicity category (n = 15) or refused to answer the question (n = 2).

XRCC1 Genotyping

Using the QIAamp Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), we extracted genomic DNA from whole blood. XRCC1 genotype was assayed using PCR followed by RFLP. The reaction for PCR was completed in a 50 μl reaction volume containing 0.3 ng DNA, 0.2 mmol/L of each primer (sense 5′-CCAAGTACAGCCAGGTCCTA-3′ and antisense 5′-AGTCTGACTCCCCTCCGGAT-3′), 1.25 units Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Branchburg, NJ), 1.25 mmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.3, 25°C), 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.001% (w/v) gelatin. PCR cycle conditions were holding at 94°C for 5 minutes and 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 60°C, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. After amplification, PCR products were digested with MspI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) as described by the supplier. Each digested sample was electrophoresed in agarose gel in Tris-borate EDTA buffer. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide, visualized on a transilluminator under UV light, and photographed. For quality control purposes, laboratory personnel were blinded to case-control status, and both negative and positive controls (including every 10th sample as a masked duplicate) were included.

Statistical Analysis

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression with XRCC1 genotype as the primary risk factor of interest. We classified XRCC1 genotype as homozygous wild-type (Arg/Arg), heterozygous (Arg/Gln), and homozygous variant (Gln/Gln) with the Arg/Arg genotype as the reference group. Additionally, we computed the ORs for the homozygous variant genotype using one or two wild-type alleles as the reference group (Arg/Arg and Arg/Gln) to permit comparison with an earlier study (12). We tested the interaction between genotype and smoking status (never or ever) and number of pack-years smoked (never smoked, 1 to 34 pack-years, or ≥35 pack-years) using a likelihood ratio test comparing the models with and without interaction terms (16). We conducted these analyses for all bladder cancers combined and restricted to transitional cell carcinomas. We further did analyses of the association between XRCC1 genotype and invasiveness (noninvasive versus invasive tumors) using polycotomous logistic regression, excluding in situ tumors (17). Lastly, we examined whether XRCC1 genotype was especially associated with early age at onset of bladder cancer (∼1 decade before the median, i.e., age <50 years) or later age at onset (age ≥50 years) using polycotomous logistic regression and computed the hazard ratio for XRCC1 by age at bladder cancer diagnosis using a Cox proportional hazard model (18). We considered age (continuous in years), gender (female or male), highest level of education attained (high school or less, college, or graduate school), and first-degree family history of bladder cancer (yes or no) as potentially confounding factors in our analyses.

Compared with the controls, cases were slightly older and more likely to be male (Table 1). Cases also were significantly more likely to be current or former smokers and have a greater number of pack-years smoked, less education, and a first-degree family history of bladder cancer (Table 1).

The variant Arg399 allelic frequency among controls was 0.37, and the distribution of the polymorphism was tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 = 4.66, 1 df, P = 0.03). The prevalence of the homozygote variant genotype was 16% for controls and 10% for cases (Table 2). The OR (95% CI) for bladder cancer among homozygote variants was 0.8 (0.5-1.2; Table 2) compared with those who were homozygous wild-type and 0.6 (0.4-1.0; Table 2) compared with those with one or more wild-type allele. Adjustment for potentially confounding factors (i.e., family history or level of education) did not appreciably affect the ORs. We examined potential interaction between XRCC1 genotype and smoking status (never versus ever) but found no evidence of an interaction (never smokers OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.6; ever smokers OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0; P for interaction = 0.62; Table 2). We did not find any indication of an interaction when we examined smoking history as the number of pack-years smoked (P for interaction = 0.96; Table 2).

The inverse association between Gln/Gln genotype and bladder cancer risk was largely confined to individuals diagnosed at age ≥50 years (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9; Table 3); however, the hazard ratio for age at diagnosis did not differ by XRCC1 genotype (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6 for Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg and Arg/Gln). There did not seem to be any significant differences in the ORs by tumor type (e.g., invasive or noninvasive; Table 3). In addition, we did not detect differences in the ORs when we restricted the analysis to transitional cell carcinomas (data not shown).

We found that the homozygote variant genotype of XRCC1 was inversely associated with bladder cancer risk and observed no evidence of an interaction between smoking and the XRCC1 polymorphism. Findings from our population-based study are strikingly similar to the two prior studies of the XRCC1Arg399Gln polymorphism in which there was a lower prevalence of the Gln/Gln genotype among bladder cancer cases than controls (11, 12). As in our study, these studies found no clear evidence of an interaction between exposure to tobacco smoke and the variant genotype on bladder cancer risk. However, an additional hospital-based study found a reduced risk of bladder cancer associated with the Arg399 polymorphism only among heavy smokers (13), and in another hospital-based study, no association was observed, although smoking history was not examined (14).

Studies of the phenotype of the Arg399Gln variant suggest that the Gln399 allele results in higher levels of DNA adducts (10), mutations (9), and sister chromatid exchanges (10) and, in theory, could lead to an increased incidence of malignancy. However, the reduced cancer risk found in ours and other studies is consistent with the hypothesis that the variant XRCC1 protein, and its consequent diminished DNA repair, could enhance damage-related apoptosis in individual cells (19). Seedhouse et al. (20) investigated the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms on secondary (treatment-related) leukemia and observed a similar inverse association of cancer risk with the XRCC1 polymorphism, citing the enhancement of apoptosis as a possible mechanism. In this case, therapy results in dramatically enhanced DNA damage to surrounding normal cells, giving rise to high secondary cancer risks. The XRCC1 homozygous variant genotype was most strongly associated with protection from secondary leukemia (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.88), with greater protection for therapy-associated disease than for primary disease (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.3-1.08). In the study of Duell et al. (10), there was evidence that the association of DNA adduct formation and the Gln/Gln genotype increased with age. These results support our finding that the inverse relationship with the variant genotype was present largely among those diagnosed at age ≥50 years. However, using a survival analytic approach, there was no evidence that the association varied by age at diagnosis, making our findings inconclusive.

The absence of a detectable interaction with tobacco smoking is somewhat surprising. If true, it implies that the phenotypically relevant DNA damage that serves as the essential substrate for the XRCC1Gln allele is not more prevalent in smokers (given that the kinetics of DNA repair are stable and approximately linear) and thus may be due to other factors. The exposure and damage of cellular DNA as well as the DNA damage response are complex phenomena, and our data indicate that there is a need to more fully understand the relationship among polymorphic DNA repair genes, carcinogen exposure, and cancer risk.

Grant support: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH grants ES00002, 5 P42 ES05947, and ES07373 and National Cancer Institute, NIH grant CA57494, CA82354.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Drs. Joel Schwartz and Zhi-Min Yuan for statistical advice and editorial comments; Megan Bronson, Leila Mott, and Virginia Stannard for technical assistance; and the participants in the New Hampshire Bladder Cancer Study.

1
Asami S, Manabe H, Miyake J, et al. Cigarette smoking induces an increase in oxidative DNA damage, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, in a central site of the human lung.
Carcinogenesis
1997
;
18
:
1763
-6.
2
Wiencke JK. DNA adduct burden and tobacco carcinogenesis.
Oncogene
2002
;
21
:
7376
-91.
3
Caldecott KW, Aoufouchi S, Johnson P, Shall S. XRCC1 polypeptide interacts with DNA polymerase β and possibly poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, and DNA ligase III is a novel molecular “nick-sensor” in vitro.
Nucleic Acids Res
1996
;
24
:
4387
-94.
4
Marintchev A, Robertson A, Dimitriadis EK, Prasad R, Wilson SH, Mullen GP. Domain specific interaction in the XRCC1-DNA polymerase β complex.
Nucleic Acids Res
2000
;
28
:
2049
-59.
5
Ramana CV, Boldogh I, Izumi T, Mitra S. Activation of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease in human cells by reactive oxygen species and its correlation with their adaptive response to genotoxicity of free radicals.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1998
;
95
:
5061
-6.
6
Siciliano MJ, Carrano AV, Thompson LH. Assignment of a human DNA-repair gene associated with sister-chromatid exchange to chromosome 19.
Mutat Res
1986
;
174
:
303
-8.
7
Lamerdin JE, Montgomery MA, Stilwagen SA, et al. Genomic sequence comparison of the human and mouse XRCC1 DNA repair gene regions.
Genomics
1995
;
25
:
547
-54.
8
Shen MR, Jones IM, Mohrenweiser H. Nonconservative amino acid substitution variants exist at polymorphic frequency in DNA repair genes in healthy humans.
Cancer Res
1998
;
58
:
604
-8.
9
Lunn RM, Langlois RG, Hsieh LL, Thompson CL, Bell DA. XRCC1 polymorphisms: effects on aflatoxin B1-DNA adducts and glycophorin A variant frequency.
Cancer Res
1999
;
59
:
2557
-61.
10
Duell EJ, Wiencke JK, Cheng TJ, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells.
Carcinogenesis
2000
;
21
:
965
-71.
11
Matullo G, Guarrera S, Carturan S, et al. DNA repair gene polymorphisms, bulky DNA adducts in white blood cells and bladder cancer in a case-control study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev
2001
;
92
:
562
-7.
12
Stern MC, Umbach DM, van Gils CH, Lunn RM, Taylor JA. DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphisms, smoking, and bladder cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev
2001
;
10
:
125
-31.
13
Shen MR, Hung RJ, Brennan P, et al. Polymorphisms of the DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, interaction with environmental exposures, and bladder cancer risk in a case-control study in northern Italy.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev
2003
;
12
:
1234
-40.
14
Sanyal S, Fabiola F, Sakano S, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair and metabolic genes in bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis. In press 2004.
15
Karagas MR, Tosteson TD, Blum J, Morris JS, Baron JA, Klaue B. Design of an epidemiologic study of drinking water Arsenic exposure and skin and bladder cancer risk in a US population.
Environ Health Perspect
1998
;
106
:
1047
-50.
16
Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume 1. The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Scientific. Lyon (France): IARC; 1980.
17
Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
18
Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of survival data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1990.
19
Nelson HH, Kelsey KT, Mott LA, Karagas MR. The XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism, sunburn, and non-melanoma skin cancer: evidence of gene-environment interaction.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
152
-5.
20
Seedhouse C, Bainton R, Lewis M, Harding A, Russell N, Das-Gupta E. The genotype distribution of the XRCC1 gene indicates a role for base excision repair in the development of therapy-related acute myeloblastic leukemia.
Blood
2002
;
100
:
3761
-6.