Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the most lethal gynecologic cancers worldwide. EOC cells educate tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) through CD44-mediated cholesterol depletion to generate an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, tumor cells frequently activate Notch1 receptors on endothelial cells (EC) to facilitate metastasis. However, further work is required to establish whether the endothelium also influences the education of recruited monocytes. Here, we report that canonical Notch signaling through RBPJ in ECs is an important player in the education of TAMs and EOC progression. Deletion of Rbpj in the endothelium of adult mice reduced infiltration of monocyte-derived macrophages into the TME of EOC and prevented the acquisition of a typical TAM gene signature; this was associated with stronger cytotoxic activity of T cells and decreased tumor burden. Mechanistically, CXCL2 was identified as a novel Notch/RBPJ target gene that regulated the expression of CD44 on monocytes and subsequent cholesterol depletion of TAMs. Bioinformatic analysis of ovarian cancer patient data showed that increased CXCL2 expression is accompanied by higher expression of CD44 and TAM education. Together, these findings indicate that EOC cells induce the tumor endothelium to secrete CXCL2 to establish an immunosuppressive microenvironment.

Significance:

Endothelial Notch signaling favors immunosuppression by increasing CXCL2 secretion to stimulate CD44 expression in macrophages, facilitating their education by tumor cells.

High-grade serous ovarian cancer is the deadliest of all gynecologic cancers (1). Most women have already developed peritoneal metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells can directly infiltrate the peritoneal cavity to seed metastases, a process called transcoelomic metastasis (2). Metastatic EOC cells initially reside in the omentum, where they undergo adaptations allowing them to spread throughout the whole peritoneal cavity. Importantly, this microenvironment is so immunosuppressive that even the infiltration of effector T cells does not per se correlate with better prognosis (3).

Peritoneal spread of EOC cells is accompanied by monocyte-derived macrophages (MN-derived macrophages) recruitment, which eventually become the most abundant myeloid cell type (4) and are a major contributor to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME; ref. 3). Upon recruitment from blood to the tumor, monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which are further educated by the TME. Eventually, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) strongly promote progression of metastatic ovarian cancer (5). However, little is known about the contribution of other stromal cells in this process.

Monocytes must cross the vascular endothelial barrier before infiltrating peritoneal organs or the peritoneal fluid. Endothelial cells (EC) not only form tubes for the transport of blood, but also produce soluble factors controlling the differentiation and function of adjacent cells. These angiocrine functions are highly context and organ specific (6, 7). In cancer, ECs provide angiocrine factors that influence tumor progression (8). Therefore, we hypothesized that monocytes get influenced by ECs while infiltrating into peritoneal tissues.

Notably, tumors can alter the transcriptome of ECs (9, 10) and this may influence transmigrating monocytes. For example, endothelial Notch signaling activity is frequently higher in tumors like EOC and in the metastatic niche compared with ECs from nontumorous tissue (11). Notch signaling is a highly conserved cell-to-cell communication system. Ligand binding induces cleavage of the transmembrane Notch receptors releasing their intracellular domain (ICD), which enters the nucleus to alter gene transcription. This canonical signaling pathway relies on the DNA-binding protein RBPJ, which turns into a transcriptional activator upon binding of a Notch receptor ICD (12). Sustained endothelial Notch1 signaling is associated with increased myeloid cell infiltration and metastasis (11). The Notch pathway in ECs is a major regulator of angiogenesis, angiocrine functions, and tumor cell transmigration (11, 13–18). Although EOC cells do not necessarily have to cross the endothelial barrier to spread throughout the peritoneum, we hypothesized that endothelial Notch signaling could still influence EOC progression via transmigrating myeloid cells.

Here, we provide insights into the essential role of endothelial RBPJ for the recruitment of monocytes and their proper education into protumoral TAMs in metastatic EOC.

Patient samples

Tissue microarray of EOC samples were provided by the tissue bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT, Heidelberg, Germany) in accordance with the regulations of the tissue bank and the approval of the ethics committee of Heidelberg University (Heidelberg, Germany).

Animal models

Female C57BL/6 mice were group housed under specific pathogen‐free barrier conditions. All animal procedures were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (RP Karlsruhe, Germany and DKFZ) and performed according to the guidelines of the local institution and the local government.

Administration of tamoxifen diluted in sterile peanut (P2144, Sigma-Aldrich) in 8 to 12 weeks old randomized mice was performed by oral gavage once with 100 μL (1 mg tamoxifen; ref. 19). Control mice, which did not express CreERT2 were treated with tamoxifen.

Model of ovarian cancer: Three weeks after gene recombination, 5 × 106 ID8-luciferase (ID8-luc) ovarian cancer cells were administered intraperitoneally in PBS. For peritoneal lavage after sacrificing the mice, 5 mL of ice-cold PBS (Gibco/Thermo Fisher Scientific) was injected intraperitoneally, and after a careful massage to mobilize cells, peritoneal fluid was collected. For analysis of ID8-luc tumor growth, the cell suspension was centrifuged and supernatant was collected. The cell pellet was suspended in 1 mL PBS and 100 μL were used to determine the luciferase activity. A total of 100 μL cell suspension were centrifuged and the cell pellet was suspended in 100 μL lysis buffer (Promega) and 20 μL of lysed cells were pipetted into white 96-well plate in triplicates. A total of 50 μL of LAR substrate (Promega) was added to the lysed cell suspension and luminescence signal was determined using the plate reader (ClarioStar, BMG Labtech). For analysis of immune cell recruitment into the peritoneal cavity, the collected peritoneal cell suspension was centrifuged and red blood cells in the cell pellet were lysed with 1 mL ACK (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After washing, the cell suspension was counted and 1 × 106 cells were used for flow cytometry staining.

Model of peritoneal inflammation: To obtain newly recruited peritoneal macrophages, 1 mL thioglycolate (2 mg/mL in H2O; B2551, Sigma-Aldrich) was injected into the peritoneum 3 weeks after gene recombination. MN-derived macrophages were isolated 24 or 72 hours after thioglycolate injection by their adherence to nontreated plastic petri dishes. Briefly, after incubation of single cells in a petri dish for 30 minutes at 37°C, nonadherent cells washed away with PBS.

Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) model: One week after gene recombination, 5 × 105 syngeneic LLC cells in PBS were subcutaneously injected into the flank of mice. Tumor volume was calculated by following formula: V = (length)(width2/2).

Cell culture

Mouse cardiac ECs (MCEC) were purchased from tebu-bio and cultured on gelatin-coated surfaces in in DMEM containing 1 g/L d-glucose, 5% FCS, 5% HEPES, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.

Human umbilical vein EC (HUVEC) were grown and maintained until passage 5 in Endopan-3 growth medium containing 3% FCS and supplements (Pan-Biotech).

SK-OV-3 cells (ATCC) were cultured in DMEM containing 1 g/L d-glucose, 10% FCS, 5% HEPES, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Last authentication March 2022, Eurofins Genomics).

ID8-luc cells, kindly donated by Prof. Frances Balkwill (Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom) were cultured in DMEM containing 1 g/L d-glucose, 10% FCS, 5% HEPES, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.

Cell cultures were tested by PCR on a regularly basis for Mycoplasma contamination periodically and before injecting the tumor cells into the mice.

HUVECs were infected with lentivirus constructs for CRISPR/Cas9 (Addgene plasmid #52961, lentiCRISPR v2) to knockout for Rbpj (20). After 48 hours of puromycin selection, cells were infected with adenovirus (Life Technologies; pAD/CMV-V5-DEST) overexpressing GFP as control or N1ICD.

cDNA synthesis and qPCR

RNA isolation from cell culture was performed using the InnuPrep Mini Kit (Analytik Jena). RNA isolation from tissues was performed using PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Acturus, Life Technologies). A total of 1 mL TRIzol was added to the tissue and homogenized for 1 minute and a frequency of 30/second. After disruption of the tissue, 200 μL chloroform were added and mixed by inverting several times followed by a centrifugation step for 15 minutes 12,000 × g at 4°C. Further RNA isolation steps were performed using the manufacture's protocol. Reverse transcription of isolated RNA into complementary DNA was performed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). qPCR was performed with SYBR Green PCR mix (Applied Biosystems) on a QuantStudio3 Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Resulting fold changes were calculated using the 2ΔΔCT method and mRNA expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene (Cph for murine and HPRT for human samples). For specific sequences, see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.

Cytotoxicity assay

To analyze the T-cell killing potential by the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Ab65393, Abcam), ID8 cells (7,500 ID8 cells in 100 μL DMEM) were seeded in a 96-well plate one day before T-cell sorting. T cells were sorted from tumor-bearing RbpjiΔEC and control mice after 6 weeks of tumor growth and 10,000 CD3+ cells were cocultured with ID8 cells in technical triplicates including untreated control and blank. After overnight incubation, cytotoxicity and killing potential was measured by LDH amount in the cell supernatant using the LDH-Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Ab65393, Abcam).

In silico analysis of promotor region

To determine RBPJ binding sites (5´-GTGGGAA-3´; ref. 21) in the promotor region of the murine (NM_009140; chr5+:90902580-90903927) and human (NM_002089; chr4-:74100502-74099123) CXCL2-encoding gene, we used ApE plasmid Editor by M. Wayne Davis (https://jorgensen.biology.utah.edu/wayned/ape/).

In silico protein–protein interaction

We used the Search Tool of Interacting Genes/Proteins database (STRING v11.5) to perform in silico protein–protein interaction analysis (22). Given CXCR2 protein as input, STRING can search for their neighbor interactors, the proteins that have direct interactions with the inputted proteins; then STRING can generate the protein–protein interaction network consisting of all these proteins and all the interactions between them. All the interactions between them were derived from high-throughput lab experiments and previous knowledge in curated databases at medium level of confidence (score ≥ 0.40).

Gene set enrichment analysis

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; Broad Institute) was used to determine whether a list of genes (gene signature) was enriched between different groups. A defined list of genes exhibits a statistically significant bias in their distribution (FDR) within a ranked gene list using the software GSEA (23), showing enrichment in one of the compared groups (normalized enrichment score) obtained from microarray or public available datasets as indicated in the figure legend.

Ingenuity pathway analysis

Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) software (Qiagen) was used to identify predicated upstream regulators and differentially regulated pathways in newly recruited macrophages (based on microarray data). For the analysis of data, fold changes were uploaded to the software. Differentially regulated pathways and upstream regulator analysis was performed from obtained microarray data.

Pathway analysis

Pathway analysis were obtained from public external databases (EnrichR) and analyzed as −log2-fold changes.

Human ovarian cancer patient RNA-sequencing data analysis

Human ovarian cancer patient bulk tumor RNA-sequencing data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Stratification in CXCL2high and CXCL2low patients was performed using R Studio software. Patients were assigned to the different groups using CXCL2 expression below the first or higher than the third quartile. Normalized raw counts of CD44 were plotted comparing the two different groups. For prognosis assessment, kmploter tool was employed (24). We evaluated gene expression in metastatic lesions with the online tool TNMplot (25).

Schematic figures

Schematics were created using BioRender.com.

Statistical analysis

Normality was tested when sample size allowed it. Those samples with normal distribution were compared using Student t test (with Welch correction when groups had different sizes). When normality was rejected, Mann–Whitney U test was used. Comparison analysis was performed with ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test when more than two groups were analyzed. Statistical analysis and the generation of the graphs were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Data availability

Microarray data generated in this article have been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus repository under the accession no. GSE213371.

Details about flow cytometry, whole mount staining, isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, IHC, Western blot analysis, transwell assay, ELISA, bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDM) differentiation are provided in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Deletion of Rbpj in endothelial cells reduces EOC progression

Metastatic EOC cells seed initially in the omentum and later spread within the peritoneum. During these steps, tumor cells undergo transcriptional changes that allow further growth and colonization (Fig. 1A). The latter is strongly influenced by MN-derived macrophages (26). To determine the contribution of canonical endothelial Notch signaling to myeloid cell infiltration and EOC progression, we used the tamoxifen-inducible VE-cadherin (Cdh5) CreERT2 strain to delete Rbpj specifically in ECs of adult mice (RbpjiΔEC). This model is well established and leads to robust gene recombination in ECs of several organs (14, 15, 17, 18) without changes in permeability (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B; refs. 17, 27). Under physiologic conditions, there were no differences in blood vessel density in omentum upon Rbpj deletion in ECs compared with controls (Supplementary Fig. S1B and S1C). Upon intraperitoneal injection of ID8 cells mimicking metastatic EOC, omenta showed evidence of tumor growth (Fig. 1C) and had significantly higher vessel density in RbpjiΔEC mice compared with control animals (Fig. 1D). Endothelial coverage with α-smooth muscle actin-positive mural cells was unchanged (Supplementary Fig. S1D). Despite increased vessel density, 4 weeks after injection tumor burden in omenta of RbpjiΔEC mice was significantly lower than that in their littermate controls (Fig. 1E). Moreover, peritoneal spread of tumor cells was significantly reduced in RbpjiΔEC mice (Fig. 1F) concluding that deletion of Rbpj in ECs reduces EOC progression and metastasis. Although, tumor burden in omenta was no longer significantly smaller after 6 weeks (Supplementary Fig. S1E), we still observed decreased tumor burden in the peritoneal cavity of Rbpj mice compared with control (Supplementary Fig. S1F).

Figure 1.

Reduced tumor burden in omentum and peritoneum of RbpjiΔEC mice. A, Model for the spread and proliferation of EOC cells in the omentum. B, Schematic illustration of oral tamoxifen administration and metastatic EOC protocol. C, Representative pictures of ID8 tumor-bearing mouse omentum and microscopic images of omentum stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Scale bar, 2 mm. D, Representative images of IHC staining for CD31 (white) and DAPI (blue) in omentum of ID8 tumor-bearing RbpjiΔEC and control mice at 4 weeks after tumor injection. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantification of vessel density. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. E, Representative images of IHC DAB cytokeratin (brown) and AP CD31 (purple) staining of omentum at 4 weeks after tumor injection. Scale bar, 20 μm. Tumor burden quantification from whole omentum at week 4 after tumor injection of control (n = 12 and 9) and RbpjiΔEC mice (n = 9 and 10). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. F, Luciferase activity in peritoneal cavity of tumor-bearing RbpjiΔEC compared with control mice 4 weeks after tumor injection. Quantification of luciferase levels in control (n = 12) and RbpjiΔEC (n = 12). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Figure 1.

Reduced tumor burden in omentum and peritoneum of RbpjiΔEC mice. A, Model for the spread and proliferation of EOC cells in the omentum. B, Schematic illustration of oral tamoxifen administration and metastatic EOC protocol. C, Representative pictures of ID8 tumor-bearing mouse omentum and microscopic images of omentum stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Scale bar, 2 mm. D, Representative images of IHC staining for CD31 (white) and DAPI (blue) in omentum of ID8 tumor-bearing RbpjiΔEC and control mice at 4 weeks after tumor injection. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantification of vessel density. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. E, Representative images of IHC DAB cytokeratin (brown) and AP CD31 (purple) staining of omentum at 4 weeks after tumor injection. Scale bar, 20 μm. Tumor burden quantification from whole omentum at week 4 after tumor injection of control (n = 12 and 9) and RbpjiΔEC mice (n = 9 and 10). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. F, Luciferase activity in peritoneal cavity of tumor-bearing RbpjiΔEC compared with control mice 4 weeks after tumor injection. Quantification of luciferase levels in control (n = 12) and RbpjiΔEC (n = 12). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Close modal

Deletion of endothelial Rbpj decreases MN-derived macrophage recruitment

Next, we analyzed the immune cell compartment of our EOC model because it is a major contributor to tumor progression. High Notch signaling activity in ECs induces VCAM1 expression, which promotes leukocyte extravasation (11, 28). However, VCAM1 expression was unchanged between RbpjiΔEC and their controls littermates (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Nevertheless, whole-mount staining of omenta revealed that there was a reduction in immune cells inside tumor nodules of RbpjiΔEC mice compared with controls (Fig. 2A; Supplementary Fig. S2B). Interestingly, tumors in control mice contained more cells with a large vacuolated cytoplasm, reminiscent of macrophages. Therefore, we analyzed this cell population in detail. Tumor-bearing omenta from RbpjiΔEC mice contained less CD11b+ cells within tumor nodules, although this was not statistically significant (Fig. 2B). To better determine the macrophage subpopulations responsible for the observed decrease in CD11b+ cells, we studied the myeloid and macrophage populations in the peritoneal cavity. After 4 weeks of tumor growth, there were no significant differences in the total amount of myeloid cells or macrophages (Fig. 2C and D). However, we found decreased numbers of small peritoneal macrophages (SPM), which are MN-derived macrophages characterized as MHC-IIhi/F4/80low (Fig. 2E) and CCR2+/Tim4 (Fig. 2F). Notably, in naïve (tumor-free) conditions, endothelial Rbpj deletion had no effect on peritoneal macrophage populations (Supplementary Fig. S2C–S2F). These data suggest that the tumor-driven recruitment of monocytes into the peritoneum is impaired upon endothelial Rbpj deletion.

Figure 2.

Reduced MN-derived macrophage recruitment in metastatic EOC of RbpjiΔEC mice. A, Representative images of whole-mount staining of tumor nodules of the omentum for luciferase (red), CD45 (green), and DAPI (blue) 4 weeks after tumor injection in RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Scale bar, 20 μm. Quantification of infiltrating immune cells (CD45+) into tumor nodules (luciferase+). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. B, Representative images of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells, CD11b+ (pink) in tumor areas, cytokeratin (brown) from RbpjiΔEC and control mice 4 weeks after tumor injection. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantification of CD11b+-infiltrating cells area normalized by tumor area. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. Analysis of myeloid cells within the peritoneal cavity after four weeks of tumor growth of RbpjiΔEC and control mice by flow cytometry. C and D, Total cell number of myeloid cells (CD45+, CD11bhigh; C) and macrophages (CD45+, CD11bhigh, F4/80+; D). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. E, Representative flow cytometer plot of MN-derived macrophages characterization by F4/80 and MHCII expression into LPM, IntPM, and SPM in RbpjiΔEC mice compared with controls and their quantification. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. F, Quantification of newly recruited MN-derived macrophages (Tim4 CCR2+) at 4 weeks of tumor growth in RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. G, Scheme of transwell assay with human CD14+ monocytes migrating through a monolayer of HUVECs toward human ovarian cancer cells (SK-OV-3). H, Analysis of cell tracer carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–stained CD14+ monocytes migrated through monolayer of HUVECs with RBPJ KO and the representative images. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Student t test. KO, knockout.

Figure 2.

Reduced MN-derived macrophage recruitment in metastatic EOC of RbpjiΔEC mice. A, Representative images of whole-mount staining of tumor nodules of the omentum for luciferase (red), CD45 (green), and DAPI (blue) 4 weeks after tumor injection in RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Scale bar, 20 μm. Quantification of infiltrating immune cells (CD45+) into tumor nodules (luciferase+). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. B, Representative images of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells, CD11b+ (pink) in tumor areas, cytokeratin (brown) from RbpjiΔEC and control mice 4 weeks after tumor injection. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantification of CD11b+-infiltrating cells area normalized by tumor area. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Welch corrected t test. Analysis of myeloid cells within the peritoneal cavity after four weeks of tumor growth of RbpjiΔEC and control mice by flow cytometry. C and D, Total cell number of myeloid cells (CD45+, CD11bhigh; C) and macrophages (CD45+, CD11bhigh, F4/80+; D). Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. E, Representative flow cytometer plot of MN-derived macrophages characterization by F4/80 and MHCII expression into LPM, IntPM, and SPM in RbpjiΔEC mice compared with controls and their quantification. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. F, Quantification of newly recruited MN-derived macrophages (Tim4 CCR2+) at 4 weeks of tumor growth in RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. G, Scheme of transwell assay with human CD14+ monocytes migrating through a monolayer of HUVECs toward human ovarian cancer cells (SK-OV-3). H, Analysis of cell tracer carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–stained CD14+ monocytes migrated through monolayer of HUVECs with RBPJ KO and the representative images. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Student t test. KO, knockout.

Close modal

To analyze chemotaxis in a more simplified in vitro system, we measured transmigration of human CD14+ monocytes through a monolayer of human ECs in a transwell insert. Chemotaxis was stimulated by SK-OV-3 human ovarian cancer cells below the insert (Fig. 2G). RBPJ deletion in HUVECs (Supplementary Fig. S3A) resulted in significantly decreased monocyte transmigration rates compared with control HUVECs (Fig. 2H). This further suggests that canonical Notch signaling in ECs is important to facilitate monocyte recruitment into the TME.

Canonical Notch signaling in ECs regulates the recruitment of MN-derived macrophages in a subcutaneous tumor model

We considered the possibility that the reduced MN-derived macrophage recruitment might only be attributed to the lower amount of EOC cells present in RbpjiΔEC mice. To test this hypothesis, we performed a subcutaneous tumor model, where we injected LLC cells in the flank of RbpjiΔEC mice and their control littermates and let them grow for 2 weeks (Fig. 3A). We monitored tumor growth to avoid that tumor sizes where different between the two groups at the time of analysis (Fig. 3B). As expected (17), vessel density was increased while vessel coverage was comparable in tumors grown in RbpjiΔEC mice (Fig. 3C and D). Nevertheless, these tumors contained significantly less macrophages, in particular MN-derived macrophages (Fig. 3EH). This indicates that the reduced MN-derived macrophage recruitment into tumors of RbpjiΔEC mice is not restricted to a certain organ bed or cancer entity and is not a simple consequence of reduced tumor growth.

Figure 3.

Canonical Notch signaling in ECs regulates the recruitment of MN-derived macrophages in a subcutaneous tumor model. A, Schematic illustration of oral tamoxifen administration and subcutaneous injection of LLC cells. B, LLC growth in RbpjiΔEC and control mice (n = 5; mean). C, Representative images of IHC staining for CD31 (white), αSMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in LLC tissue from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantification of vessel density and vessel coverage, n ≥ 5. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. D, Flow cytometric analysis of CD31+ cells relative to alive cells in LLC from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. E–H, Flow cytometric analysis of immune cells (CD45+; E), myeloid cells (CD45+ CD11b+; F), macrophages (CD45+ CD11b+ F4/80+; G), and MN-derived macrophages (CD45+ CD11b+ F4/80low; H) within the TME of RbpjiΔEC mice compared with controls (n = 5; mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test). I, Representative images of tissue microarray from patients with ovarian cancer stained by NOTCH1 and myeloid cells stained with CD33. Graph represents the correlation between level of NOTCH1 expression [low, intermediate (int), and high] and infiltration CD33+ cells classified as 1 (low), 2 (intermediate), and 3 (high). n = 50 patient samples. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Figure 3.

Canonical Notch signaling in ECs regulates the recruitment of MN-derived macrophages in a subcutaneous tumor model. A, Schematic illustration of oral tamoxifen administration and subcutaneous injection of LLC cells. B, LLC growth in RbpjiΔEC and control mice (n = 5; mean). C, Representative images of IHC staining for CD31 (white), αSMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in LLC tissue from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantification of vessel density and vessel coverage, n ≥ 5. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. D, Flow cytometric analysis of CD31+ cells relative to alive cells in LLC from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. E–H, Flow cytometric analysis of immune cells (CD45+; E), myeloid cells (CD45+ CD11b+; F), macrophages (CD45+ CD11b+ F4/80+; G), and MN-derived macrophages (CD45+ CD11b+ F4/80low; H) within the TME of RbpjiΔEC mice compared with controls (n = 5; mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test). I, Representative images of tissue microarray from patients with ovarian cancer stained by NOTCH1 and myeloid cells stained with CD33. Graph represents the correlation between level of NOTCH1 expression [low, intermediate (int), and high] and infiltration CD33+ cells classified as 1 (low), 2 (intermediate), and 3 (high). n = 50 patient samples. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Close modal

In addition, we validated this Notch-mediated myeloid cell recruitment in a tissue microarray of 50 human ovarian cancer samples. There was a positive correlation between NOTCH1 activity (nuclear staining indicating active Notch1 intracellular domain) and tumor infiltration with CD33+ cells (Fig. 3I). As such, endothelial Notch/RBPJ signaling is a regulator of myeloid cell tumor infiltration in mice and human.

Endothelial Notch-induced monocyte recruitment is mediated by CXCL2

We transduced RBPJ-deficient HUVEC and control cells with N1ICD (Supplementary Fig. S3B) to determine which of those transcriptional changes are entirely dependent on RBPJ. These were CCL1, CCL21, CXCL12, and CXCL2 (Fig. 4A; Supplementary Fig. S3C and S3D). Next, we measured the mRNA expression levels of these chemokines in peritoneal adipose tissue obtained from RbpjiΔEC mice. There was lower Cxcl2 expression in peritoneal adipose tissue from RbpjiΔEC mice compared with littermate controls, whereas the other chemokines analyzed were not changed (Fig. 4B). Analysis of the same cytokines in endothelial-specific N1ICD mice (11, 15), revealed that higher endothelial Notch1 signaling activity led to higher Cxcl2 expression in peritoneal adipose tissue (Fig. 4C). We confirmed this Rbpj-mediated gene expression regulation also in isolated lung EC (Supplementary Fig. S3E). Next, we evaluated blood serum levels of CXCL2. In ID8 tumor-bearing mice, we only detected a slight decrease in CXCL2 levels (Fig. 4D). We aimed at generating an acute inflammation in the peritoneum, similar to that happening during tumor growth, to test whether endothelial Rbpj would be required for systemic CXCL2 induction. RbpjiΔEC and control mice were injected with thioglycolate to induce MN-derived macrophage recruitment into the peritoneal cavity under tumor-free conditions. Mice lacking endothelial Rbpj had significantly lower CXCL2 amounts in serum (Fig. 4D). This underscores the essential role of canonical endothelial Notch signaling for the production of CXCL2 during inflammation.

Figure 4.

Endothelial Notch-mediated recruitment via CXCL2. A, Quantification of mRNA expression of CCL1, CCL21, CXCL12, and CXCL2 upon N1ICD overexpression, knockout of RBPJ, or their combination in HUVECs. Bar graphs show n-fold versus GFP transduced as mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. B, Quantification of mRNA expression in whole peritoneal fat tissue from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. C, Quantification of mRNA expression in whole peritoneal fat tissue from ecN1ICD and control mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. D, ELISA of CXCL2 in serum from RbpjiΔEC and control mice after 4 weeks of tumor growth (tumor) and 4 hours after of thioglycollate intraperitoneal injection. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. E, Scheme of RBPJ binding in CXCL2 promotor region in murine and human genes. F, ELISA of CXCL2 in cell culture supernatant from HUVECs infected with N1ICD and GFP as control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. G, Analysis of cell tracer carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–stained CD14+ monocytes migrated toward CXCL2 cytokine. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. H, ELISA of CXCL2 of HUVECs with knockdown of CXCL2. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. I, Scheme of transwell assay with human CD14+ monocytes migrating through a monolayer of HUVECs toward human ovarian cancer cells (SK-OV-3). Analysis of cell tracer carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–stained CD14+ monocytes migrated through monolayer of HUVECs with knockdown of CXCL2. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Student t test.

Figure 4.

Endothelial Notch-mediated recruitment via CXCL2. A, Quantification of mRNA expression of CCL1, CCL21, CXCL12, and CXCL2 upon N1ICD overexpression, knockout of RBPJ, or their combination in HUVECs. Bar graphs show n-fold versus GFP transduced as mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. B, Quantification of mRNA expression in whole peritoneal fat tissue from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. C, Quantification of mRNA expression in whole peritoneal fat tissue from ecN1ICD and control mice. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. D, ELISA of CXCL2 in serum from RbpjiΔEC and control mice after 4 weeks of tumor growth (tumor) and 4 hours after of thioglycollate intraperitoneal injection. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. E, Scheme of RBPJ binding in CXCL2 promotor region in murine and human genes. F, ELISA of CXCL2 in cell culture supernatant from HUVECs infected with N1ICD and GFP as control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. G, Analysis of cell tracer carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–stained CD14+ monocytes migrated toward CXCL2 cytokine. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. H, ELISA of CXCL2 of HUVECs with knockdown of CXCL2. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. I, Scheme of transwell assay with human CD14+ monocytes migrating through a monolayer of HUVECs toward human ovarian cancer cells (SK-OV-3). Analysis of cell tracer carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–stained CD14+ monocytes migrated through monolayer of HUVECs with knockdown of CXCL2. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, Student t test.

Close modal

In silico analysis showed that the mouse and human Cxcl2 genes contain RBPJ-binding sites in promoter regions (Fig. 4E). Consistently, cultured human ECs secreted higher CXCL2 protein levels after being transduced with N1ICD-expressing adenovirus compared with control (Fig. 4F).

The data presented so far indicate that canonical Notch signaling induces CXCL2 expression in ECs. CXCL2 attracts granulocytes, but also to a lesser extend monocytes (29). As such, CXCL2 is an interesting endothelial Notch target, which could mediate the observed effects on monocyte recruitment into the TME. To evaluate whether CXCL2 was capable of attracting monocytes, we performed transwell chemotaxis experiments and observed that recombinant CXCL2 induced monocyte transmigration (Fig. 4G). Next, we inhibited CXCL2 expression in ECs using short hairpin RNA, which led to an about 50% reduction of CXCL2 protein expression (Fig. 4H). Compared with nonsilencing control, this reduction was already capable of reducing the numbers of monocytes transmigrating through ECs toward SK-OV-3 cells (Fig. 4I). In summary, the data implicate that the endothelial RBPJ/CXCL2 axis contributes to monocyte recruitment into the peritoneum during transcoelomic metastasis.

Rbpj in ECs is necessary for tumor-mediated TAM education

Recruited monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which are further educated by tumor cells to become tumor-promoting macrophages. Hypersensitivity toward IL4 facilitates macrophage education in EOC. This is induced by tumor cell–mediated cholesterol depletion (4). We sought to understand whether lack of Rbpj in ECs could influence macrophage phenotypes. To assess this, we isolated newly recruited MN-derived macrophages (CD11b+/F4/80+/CCR2+; Fig. 5A) and obtained their transcriptomic profile by microarray analysis. GSEA comparing MN-derived macrophages from RbpjiΔEC and control tumor-bearing mice revealed that Rbpj in ECs is necessary to acquire the typical phenotype of TAM in this model of metastatic EOC (Fig. 5B). As such, tumor cells could not fully educate MN-derived macrophages in mice lacking endothelial Rbpj.

Figure 5.

Essential role of endothelial Rbpj for tumor-mediated TAM education. A, Schematic illustration of sorting of newly recruited MN-derived macrophages for microarray analysis after 4 weeks of tumor growth in RbpjiΔEC and control mice. B, GSEA of the TAMs signature in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC versus control mice compared with 20 most differentially regulated genes. C, IPA for upstream regulator in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. D and E, Analysis of significant differentially regulated pathways by IPAs (D) and pathway analysis (E). F, GSEA of cholesterol homeostasis in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC versus control mice with 20 most differentially regulated genes. G, Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of cholera toxin (CTB) levels of macrophages isolated from peritoneal lavage of RbpjiΔEC and control mice after 72 hours of thioglycollate intraperitoneal injection cultured O/N with conditioned medium from ID8 tumor cells (CM-ID8) or control medium (basal). Quantification relative to basal conditions. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; one-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. H, Quantification of ARG1 mRNA expression relative to control in BMDMs after stimulation with conditioned medium from Rbpj knockout (KO) or control MCECs with CM-ID8 and IL4 for 8 hours. I, MFI of CD44 expression of human monocytes cocultured with human ECs carrying an RBPJ knockout. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. J and K, Quantification relative to control from BMDMs after stimulation with CM-MCECs with Rbpj knockout and control of Cd44 (J) and Mmp9 (K) mRNA expression. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, paired Student t test. L, Quantification of mRNA expression of Cd44 from macrophages isolated from peritoneal lavage of RbpjiΔEC mice after 24 hours of thioglycollate intraperitoneal injection relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Student t test. M, BMDMs control and stimulated with CXCL2 (40 ng/mL) for 72 hours. Quantification of mRNA expression of CD44 relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, paired Student t test. N, BMDMs control and stimulated with CXCL2 (60 ng/mL) for 72 hours. Representative image of Western blot analysis shows CD44 and vinculin protein and quantification relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, paired Student t test. O, Representative images of BMDMs stained with CD44 (white), CD45 (red), and DAPI (blue) of control and stimulated with CXCL2 (40 ng/mL) for 72 hours. P, MFI of CD44 expression of BMDMs stimulated with CXCL2 (60 ng/mL), the CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002 (1 μmol/L), and the combination for 72 hours. Quantification relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, one-way ANOVA. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Figure 5.

Essential role of endothelial Rbpj for tumor-mediated TAM education. A, Schematic illustration of sorting of newly recruited MN-derived macrophages for microarray analysis after 4 weeks of tumor growth in RbpjiΔEC and control mice. B, GSEA of the TAMs signature in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC versus control mice compared with 20 most differentially regulated genes. C, IPA for upstream regulator in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. D and E, Analysis of significant differentially regulated pathways by IPAs (D) and pathway analysis (E). F, GSEA of cholesterol homeostasis in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC versus control mice with 20 most differentially regulated genes. G, Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of cholera toxin (CTB) levels of macrophages isolated from peritoneal lavage of RbpjiΔEC and control mice after 72 hours of thioglycollate intraperitoneal injection cultured O/N with conditioned medium from ID8 tumor cells (CM-ID8) or control medium (basal). Quantification relative to basal conditions. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; one-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. H, Quantification of ARG1 mRNA expression relative to control in BMDMs after stimulation with conditioned medium from Rbpj knockout (KO) or control MCECs with CM-ID8 and IL4 for 8 hours. I, MFI of CD44 expression of human monocytes cocultured with human ECs carrying an RBPJ knockout. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. J and K, Quantification relative to control from BMDMs after stimulation with CM-MCECs with Rbpj knockout and control of Cd44 (J) and Mmp9 (K) mRNA expression. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, paired Student t test. L, Quantification of mRNA expression of Cd44 from macrophages isolated from peritoneal lavage of RbpjiΔEC mice after 24 hours of thioglycollate intraperitoneal injection relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Student t test. M, BMDMs control and stimulated with CXCL2 (40 ng/mL) for 72 hours. Quantification of mRNA expression of CD44 relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, paired Student t test. N, BMDMs control and stimulated with CXCL2 (60 ng/mL) for 72 hours. Representative image of Western blot analysis shows CD44 and vinculin protein and quantification relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, paired Student t test. O, Representative images of BMDMs stained with CD44 (white), CD45 (red), and DAPI (blue) of control and stimulated with CXCL2 (40 ng/mL) for 72 hours. P, MFI of CD44 expression of BMDMs stimulated with CXCL2 (60 ng/mL), the CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002 (1 μmol/L), and the combination for 72 hours. Quantification relative to control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, one-way ANOVA. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Close modal

Transcriptomic profiling via IPA determined that IL4 was the most downregulated signaling pathway in MN-derived macrophages obtained from RbpjiΔEC tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 5C). IPA and pathway analysis showed that genes important for cholesterol synthesis were downregulated in MN-derived macrophages from RbpjiΔEC mice (Fig. 5D and E). We then employed a cholesterol homeostasis gene set from TAMs (4), representing EOC-induced cholesterol metabolism in TAMs. GSEA showed that this gene set was significantly enriched in newly recruited macrophages coming from control tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 5F), indicating that Rbpj in ECs is necessary for cholesterol depletion in TAMs. We confirmed these results by studying cholesterol depletion in isolated MN-derived macrophages (thioglycolate injection) from RbpjiΔEC and control mice. As expected, we observed that conditioned medium from ID8 ovarian carcinoma cells (ID8-CM) was not able to reduce cholesterol from the membrane of MN-derived macrophages isolated from RbpjiΔEC mice (Fig. 5G). Moreover, this effect translated into a lower arginase-1 (Arg1) mRNA expression a well-known IL4 target (Fig. 5H).

Cholesterol depletion is mediated by tumor cell–secreted high molecular weight hyaluronan (HMW-HA). The interaction with HA receptors, such as CD44, in macrophages leads to cholesterol efflux (4). To understand whether Rbpj in ECs could be important for CD44 expression in monocytes, we cocultured human monocytes with HUVECs lacking RBPJ or with respective controls. Monocytes cocultured with RBPJ-deficient HUVECs, had less CD44 on their membrane than those incubated with control HUVECs (Fig. 5I). Next, when incubating BMDM with conditioned medium from immortalized MCECs lacking Rbpj (CRISPR-Cas9 mediated), macrophages expressed less Cd44 (Fig. 5J) and Mmp9 (Fig. 5K), a known CD44 target gene. This indicates that a secreted angiocrine factor regulated by the transcription factor RBPJ in ECs is necessary for the regulation of CD44 in macrophages. To understand whether this would also happen in vivo, we analyzed Cd44 mRNA expression MN-derived macrophages (after thioglycolate injection) and found that those coming from RbpjiΔEC mice expressed significantly less Cd44 than those coming from control mice (Fig. 5L), confirming that endothelial Rbpj is essential for Cd44 regulation in MN-derived macrophages in vivo.

Considering the important role that CXCL2 had in monocyte recruitment in RbpjiΔEC tumor-bearing mice and that higher level of CXCL2 in serum is associated with myeloid cell infiltration into the TME and worse prognosis for patients with EOC (30), we decided to analyze its role in regulating CD44 expression. When stimulating BMDMs with recombinant CXCL2, Cd44 mRNA (Fig. 5M) and protein (Fig. 5N) were increased. In addition, immunofluorescence staining revealed that CXCL2 stimulation significantly increased the presence of CD44 on the plasma membrane of BMDMs (Fig. 5O; Supplementary Fig. S4), which would consequently increase its accessibility to hyaluronic acid. We further confirmed this altered localization by flow cytometry (Fig. 5P). This was mediated through CXCR2, the most common CXCL2 receptor, as the CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002 blocked the CD44 increase on the plasma membrane (Fig. 5P).

The TAM gene signature is enriched in human ovarian carcinoma samples with high CXCL2 expression

The data presented so far indicate that the angiocrine factor CXCL2, which is under transcriptional control of Notch/RBPJ signaling, preconditions monocytes to be educated by tumor cells in the TME. To evaluate the relevance of this, we analyzed CXCL2 and CD44 mRNA expression levels in publicly available datasets from TCGA. Remarkably, the stratification of patients with ovarian cancer in 25% upper (CXCL2high) and lower (CXCL2low) CXCL2 expression showed that CXCL2high patients displayed significantly more expression of CD44 (Fig. 6A). These data suggest a positive correlation between CXCL2 and CD44 expression in human tumors. Interestingly, CD44 expression is significantly higher in metastatic samples compared with normal or primary tumor samples (Supplementary Fig. S5A). In addition, we performed GSEA comparing CXCL2high and CXCL2low patients using the abovementioned TAM signature and found that it was significantly enriched in CXCL2high patients (Fig. 6B), indicating that the increased CD44 expression in these patients consequently impacts TAM education.

Figure 6.

CXCL2 expression in patients with ovarian cancer correlates with CD44 expression and TAM education. A, Analysis of CD44 raw counts in CXCL2high (n = 97) versus CXCl2low (n = 100) patient stratification of publicly available bulk tumor of human ovarian cancer from TCGA database using R Studio software. Bar graphs show median; two-tailed, unpaired Student t test. B, GSEA of the TAM signature in patients with CXCL2low versus CXCL2high ovarian cancer from TCGA database. C and D, Analysis of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of CXCL2low (C) and CXCL2high (D) patients fold changes and shown as log2 ratio from extracted P values. E, GSEA of cholesterol homeostasis in patients with CXCL2low versus CXCL2high ovarian cancer from TCGA database. F and G, Graphs representing PFS of patients with ovarian cancer, filtered for patients with optimal debulking surgery, as stratified by the top 10 cholesterol homeostasis genes in TCGA (F) and top 10 TAM genes up in control versus RbpjΔEC mice (G). H, Both gene sets used in F and G combined.

Figure 6.

CXCL2 expression in patients with ovarian cancer correlates with CD44 expression and TAM education. A, Analysis of CD44 raw counts in CXCL2high (n = 97) versus CXCl2low (n = 100) patient stratification of publicly available bulk tumor of human ovarian cancer from TCGA database using R Studio software. Bar graphs show median; two-tailed, unpaired Student t test. B, GSEA of the TAM signature in patients with CXCL2low versus CXCL2high ovarian cancer from TCGA database. C and D, Analysis of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of CXCL2low (C) and CXCL2high (D) patients fold changes and shown as log2 ratio from extracted P values. E, GSEA of cholesterol homeostasis in patients with CXCL2low versus CXCL2high ovarian cancer from TCGA database. F and G, Graphs representing PFS of patients with ovarian cancer, filtered for patients with optimal debulking surgery, as stratified by the top 10 cholesterol homeostasis genes in TCGA (F) and top 10 TAM genes up in control versus RbpjΔEC mice (G). H, Both gene sets used in F and G combined.

Close modal

When analyzing differences between CXCL2hi and CXCL2low patients, we found the expected upregulation of chemotactic response and myeloid cell recruitment in CXCL2high patients, as shown by Gene Ontology term analysis (Supplementary Fig. S5B and S5C). Interestingly, we again identified cholesterol metabolism as one of the most downregulated pathways in CXCL2low patients (Fig. 6C). CXCL2high patients showed induction of pathways such as lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis (Fig. 6D). Indeed, GSEA showed that the same cholesterol metabolism gene set previously employed was significantly enriched in CXCL2high cohort (Fig. 6E), indicating a similar cholesterol depletion as the one occurring in peritoneal macrophages of our mouse model.

To explore the relevance of CXCL2high transcriptional profile for patient survival, we extracted the 10 most enriched genes in CXCL2high compared with CXCL2low, obtained from the GSEA for cholesterol homeostasis (Fig. 6E). We then evaluated their impact on prognosis. To discriminate mainly for metastatic events, we decided to filter samples for optimal debulking surgery, which is defined as that one where the residual tumor was <1 cm, and analyzed progression-free survival (PFS). We obtained that this CXCL2-associated cholesterol homeostasis signature correlated with a significantly faster PFS, from 31 to 19 months (Fig. 6F). To evaluate the association of our TAM signature on tumor progression, we focused on the GSEA performed in isolated TAMs from our mouse models (Fig. 5AF). We selected the 10 most enriched genes in the controls, as a macrophage (TAM) signature. In the same conditions of optimal debulking surgery, we obtained that those TAM genes correlated again with a much shorter PFS (from 29 to 19 months), indicating their possible positive correlation to metastasis (Fig. 6G). Moreover, when analyzing the effect on prognosis of both signatures (CXCL2 and TAM) combined, we obtained an even more drastic reduction of PFS, suggesting that these genes have additive effects (Fig. 6H). These data reinforce the role that CXCL2-mediated TAM education has on tumor prognosis.

TAM education mediated by endothelial Rbpj affects T-cell cytotoxicity

One of the genes downregulated in MN-derived macrophages from RbpjiΔEC tumor-bearing mice is Cd74 (Fig. 5B). CD74 is important in TAMs during brain metastasis (31), and associated with worse prognosis in metastatic ovarian cancer (32). CXCL2 is a ligand for CXCR2 (29), and CD44 is part of a receptor complex that contains CD74 and CXCR2 (33, 34). Moreover, CD44 plays an important role in CD74-mediated signal transduction (35). In silico analysis showed that CD74 interacts closely with CD44 and CXCR2 (Fig. 7A) and it is increased in metastatic samples as compared with normal tissue (Supplementary Fig. S6A).

Figure 7.

Loss of endothelial Rbpj increases cytotoxic potential and proportion of cytotoxic T cells in peritoneal lavage of tumor-bearing mice. A,In silico protein-protein interaction analysis shows the association between CXCR2, CD44, and CD74. Results were mapped with CXCR2 as query protein using the STRING database. Protein–protein results were obtained using medium confidence interaction score (0.400). Line thickness of network edges indicates the strength of data support. B, GSEA of publicly available data (E-MTAB-3309) of TAM signature in WT versus CD74 knockout (KO) IL4-treated BMDMs with the 10 most enriched genes in WT. C, GSEA of CD74-mediated gene signature in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC versus control mice with 10 most differentially regulated genes. D, Schematic illustration of T-cell sorting for cytotoxicity assay after 6 weeks of tumor growth. E, LDH-cytotoxicity assay of sorted CD3+ T cells and incubation with in vitro–cultivated murine ovarian cancer cells (ID8) measured by absorbance at 450 nm including blank correction. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. F and G, Percentage of CD3+ cells (relative to CD45+ cells; F) and their proportion in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (relative to CD3+ cells; G) in peritoneal lavage of RbpjiΔEC and control mice 4 weeks after tumor injection. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Figure 7.

Loss of endothelial Rbpj increases cytotoxic potential and proportion of cytotoxic T cells in peritoneal lavage of tumor-bearing mice. A,In silico protein-protein interaction analysis shows the association between CXCR2, CD44, and CD74. Results were mapped with CXCR2 as query protein using the STRING database. Protein–protein results were obtained using medium confidence interaction score (0.400). Line thickness of network edges indicates the strength of data support. B, GSEA of publicly available data (E-MTAB-3309) of TAM signature in WT versus CD74 knockout (KO) IL4-treated BMDMs with the 10 most enriched genes in WT. C, GSEA of CD74-mediated gene signature in recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC versus control mice with 10 most differentially regulated genes. D, Schematic illustration of T-cell sorting for cytotoxicity assay after 6 weeks of tumor growth. E, LDH-cytotoxicity assay of sorted CD3+ T cells and incubation with in vitro–cultivated murine ovarian cancer cells (ID8) measured by absorbance at 450 nm including blank correction. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. F and G, Percentage of CD3+ cells (relative to CD45+ cells; F) and their proportion in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (relative to CD3+ cells; G) in peritoneal lavage of RbpjiΔEC and control mice 4 weeks after tumor injection. Bar graphs show mean ± SD; two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. (Schematics created using BioRender.com.)

Close modal

Furthermore, CD74 was associated with an immunosuppressive phenotype in macrophages (36). We therefore investigated whether the downregulation of CD74 could have a consequence on TAM function. For that, we analyzed publicly available datasets of IL4 responses in CD74-deficient macrophages (37). GSEA showed that the TAM signature was enriched in wild-type macrophages, indicating that CD74 is not only regulated by IL4, but also necessary for TAM education (Fig. 7B). We extracted a signature with the 500 most enriched genes in control compared with CD74-deficient macrophages stimulated with IL4 (CD74-mediated signature), representing a group of genes induced by IL4 through CD74 activation. When comparing newly recruited MN-derived macrophages from our EOC model by GSEA, we found that the CD74-mediated signature was significantly enriched in macrophages isolated from control mice compared with RbpjiΔEC. This suggests that newly recruited macrophages from RbpjiΔEC mice cannot induce their immunosuppressive phenotype due to downregulation of CD74-mediated genes (Fig. 7C).

To verify the specific effect on the newly recruited macrophages, we repeated the same analysis on resident macrophages (CD11b+/F4/80+/CCR2), in which Cd74 is not differentially expressed between RbpjiΔEC tumor-bearing and control mice, and found no enrichment of this gene set in any group. This confirms that endothelial Rbpj deletion only affects Cd74 expression in newly recruited MN-derived macrophages (Supplementary Fig. S6B). In summary, only macrophages that have crossed the EC barrier as monocytes were affected by the lack of Rbpj in the endothelium.

It has been previously reported that TME in metastatic ovarian cancer is highly immunosuppressive, which was attributed to TAMs (3). For this reason, we tested whether impaired TAM education impacts on T-cell function. We isolated T cells from tumor-bearing RbpjiΔEC mice and their littermate controls 6 weeks after intraperitoneal injection of ID8 cells (Fig. 7D). Results demonstrated that T cells derived from RbpjiΔEC mice were more efficient in killing cultured ID8 cells (Fig. 7E). This confirms that impairment in TAM education has a direct impact on T-cell cytotoxicity. In addition, the analysis of T-cell populations in peritoneal cavity from tumor-bearing mice revealed that, although the total frequency of T cells was not changed, the cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell population was significantly increased in RbpjiΔEC mice compared with their littermate controls (Fig. 7F and G). In summary, our data reveal that Rbpj in ECs is necessary for tumor cell–mediated education of MN-derived macrophages into TAMs (Fig. 8).

Figure 8.

Proposed mechanism. Model of endothelial Notch1-dependent recruitment and education of MN-derived macrophages (TAM) into the TME. TCs activate Notch1 on the tumor endothelium. Activation of endothelial Notch signaling leads to a secretion of angiocrine factors, especially CXCL2, which leads to an increased infiltration of MN-derived macrophages (by its receptor CXCR2) into the TME. Loss of endothelial Notch signaling inhibits TC-induced education of TAMs by priming of monocytes, leading to a downregulation of hyaluronan receptor CD44 as well as protumorigenic receptor CD74 on TAMs. (Model created with BioRender.com.)

Figure 8.

Proposed mechanism. Model of endothelial Notch1-dependent recruitment and education of MN-derived macrophages (TAM) into the TME. TCs activate Notch1 on the tumor endothelium. Activation of endothelial Notch signaling leads to a secretion of angiocrine factors, especially CXCL2, which leads to an increased infiltration of MN-derived macrophages (by its receptor CXCR2) into the TME. Loss of endothelial Notch signaling inhibits TC-induced education of TAMs by priming of monocytes, leading to a downregulation of hyaluronan receptor CD44 as well as protumorigenic receptor CD74 on TAMs. (Model created with BioRender.com.)

Close modal

Collectively, this study provides evidence about a novel angiocrine axis influencing the tumor immune microenvironment. We show how Notch/RBPJ-mediated transcription in ECs, which is frequently hyperactive in tumors (11), is required for CXCL2-mediated monocyte chemotaxis, induction of CD44 expression on monocytes, and the adoption of a TAM gene signature in metastatic ovarian cancer.

Mice with EC-restricted Rbpj loss had impaired ovarian carcinoma growth in the peritoneum and lower numbers of MN-derived macrophages in the peritoneal fluid. These macrophages are essential for metastatic ovarian cancer progression (4, 38). As such, the endothelium can influence tumor progression and metastasis by altering the immune status of the TME. Specifically, we observed that monocyte recruitment is potentiated, at least in part, through the release of RBPJ-mediated CXCL2 from ECs. This effect is independent of the tumor cells, because it can be reproduced in an independent tumor model or upon thioglycolate injection. Interestingly, higher serum levels of CXCL2 in patients with ovarian cancer are associated with myeloid cell infiltration, poor prognosis, and chemoresistance (39). It should be noted that this chemokine has been traditionally associated with the recruitment of neutrophils (29). However, there is evidence that CXCL2 also plays a role in the regulation of TAMs, especially those derived from monocytes. For instance, the CXCL2 receptor CXCR2 on monocytes and macrophages is important for the education of TAMs in prostate cancer (40).

CXCR2 blockade has also been shown to resensitize ovarian cancer to cisplatin treatment (41). Here we suggest that the CXCL2/CXCR2 axis might also have a role in the recruitment and education of macrophages in ovarian cancer. By separating newly recruited macrophages from macrophages that have resided in the peritoneal cavity for a longer period, we observed that endothelial RBPJ is necessary for the education into TAMs by tumor cells. Specifically, we report that MN-derived macrophages in contact with ECs lacking RBPJ had a lower expression of the HA receptor CD44. This receptor gets stimulated by HMW-HA produced by tumor cells to induce cholesterol depletion in macrophages, a crucial mechanism by which tumor cells educate TAMs (4). Therefore, we propose that through this mechanism ECs can precondition MN-derived macrophages and contribute to their immunosuppressive phenotype within the TME. Consistently, T cells isolated from this TME were more efficient at killing tumor cells.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that peritoneal ECs are critically involved in the recruitment and education of MN-derived macrophages in ovarian carcinoma.

No disclosures were reported.

E. Alsina-Sanchis: Data curation, software, formal analysis, validation, investigation, methodology, writing–review and editing. R. Mülfarth: Data curation, software, formal analysis, validation, investigation, methodology, writing–review and editing. I. Moll: Data curation, software, methodology. S. Böhn: Data curation, software, methodology. L. Wiedmann: Data curation, software, investigation, methodology. L. Jordana-Urriza: Data curation, software, investigation, methodology. T. Ziegelbauer: Data curation, software, investigation, methodology. E. Zimmer: Investigation, methodology. J. Taylor: Data curation, software, investigation, methodology. F. De Angelis Rigotti: Data curation, software, investigation, methodology. A. Stögbauer: Data curation, software, methodology. B.D. Giaimo: Resources, data curation, software, methodology. A. Cerwenka: Resources, formal analysis, funding acquisition, writing–review and editing. T. Borggrefe: Resources, formal analysis, writing–review and editing. A. Fischer: Conceptualization, resources, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, validation, project administration, writing–review and editing. J. Rodriguez-Vita: Conceptualization, resources, data curation, software, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, validation, investigation, methodology, writing–original draft, project administration.

The authors thank Ralf Adams (MPI Münster, Germany) for providing Cdh5-CreERT2 mice and kindly acknowledge Dr. Christiane Opitz for providing the SK-OV-3 cell line and Frances Balkwill (Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom) for providing ID8-luc cells. They thank the Light Microscopy core facility, the Microarray Unit, the Flow Cytometry core facility, and animal caretakers of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) for providing excellent services. The authors would like to thank Damir Krunic (DKFZ, Light Microscopy Core Facility) in particular for his help with FIJI software data analysis. They thank the Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and the Institute of Pathology at Heidelberg University Hospital, both in Germany, for their support with the tissue microarray. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project 394046768 - SFB1366 projects C4, C2 (to A. Fischer and A. Cerwenka), SPP 1937 (CE 140/2-2 to A. Cerwenka), TRR179 (TP07 to A. Cerwenka), SFB-TRR156 (B10N to A. Cerwenka), TRR81-A12 (to T. Borggrefe); the Cooperation Program in Cancer Research of the German Research Cancer Center (DKFZ) and the Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST; to A. Fischer), the State of Hesse (LOEWE iCANx), von Behring-Röntgen Stiftung (65-0004 to T. Borggrefe), DFG project 419966437, Deutsche Krebshilfe project 70113888, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (PID2020-117946GB-I00 and RYC2019-027937-I), and RYC2019-027937-I to J. Rodriguez-Vita). The Science Ministry of Spain or the Health Ministry (ISCIII) receives support from the EU and its ERDF program. Part of the equipment used in this work has been funded by Generalitat Valenciana and co-financed with ERDF funds (OP ERDF of Comunitat Valenciana 2014–2020).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of publication fees. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

1.
Ferlay
J
,
Colombet
M
,
Soerjomataram
I
,
Parkin
DM
,
Pineros
M
,
Znaor
A
, et al
.
Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview
.
Int J Cancer
2021
[Online ahead of print]. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588.
2.
Kipps
E
,
Tan
DS
,
Kaye
SB
.
Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2013
;
13
:
273
82
.
3.
Hensler
M
,
Kasikova
L
,
Fiser
K
,
Rakova
J
,
Skapa
P
,
Laco
J
, et al
.
M2-like macrophages dictate clinically relevant immunosuppression in metastatic ovarian cancer
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
:
e000979
.
4.
Goossens
P
,
Rodriguez-Vita
J
,
Etzerodt
A
,
Masse
M
,
Rastoin
O
,
Gouirand
V
, et al
.
Membrane cholesterol efflux drives tumor-associated macrophage reprogramming and tumor progression
.
Cell Metab
2019
;
29
:
1376
89
.
5.
Noy
R
,
Pollard
JW
.
Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy
.
Immunity
2014
;
41
:
49
61
.
6.
Rafii
S
,
Butler
JM
,
Ding
BS
.
Angiocrine functions of organ-specific endothelial cells
.
Nature
2016
;
529
:
316
25
.
7.
Augustin
HG
,
Koh
GY
.
Organotypic vasculature: from descriptive heterogeneity to functional pathophysiology
.
Science
2017
;
357
:
eaal2379
.
8.
Alsina-Sanchis
E
,
Mulfarth
R
,
Fischer
A
.
Control of tumor progression by angiocrine factors
.
Cancers
2021
;
13
:
2610
.
9.
Zhao
Q
,
Eichten
A
,
Parveen
A
,
Adler
C
,
Huang
Y
,
Wang
W
, et al
.
Single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal endothelial cell heterogeneity in tumors and changes following antiangiogenic treatment
.
Cancer Res
2018
;
78
:
2370
82
.
10.
Zhao
Q
,
Molina-Portela
MDP
,
Parveen
A
,
Adler
A
,
Adler
C
., E H, et al
.
Heterogeneity and chimerism of endothelial cells revealed by single-cell transcriptome in orthotopic liver tumors
.
Angiogenesis
2020
;
23
:
581
97
.
11.
Wieland
E
,
Rodriguez-Vita
J
,
Liebler
SS
,
Mogler
C
,
Moll
I
,
Herberich
SE
, et al
.
Endothelial Notch1 activity facilitates metastasis
.
Cancer Cell
2017
;
31
:
355
67
.
12.
Bray
SJ
.
Notch signalling in context
.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2016
;
17
:
722
35
.
13.
Limbourg
FP
,
Takeshita
K
,
Radtke
F
,
Bronson
RT
,
Chin
MT
,
Liao
JK
.
Essential role of endothelial Notch1 in angiogenesis
.
Circulation
2005
;
111
:
1826
32
.
14.
Hasan
SS
,
Jabs
M
,
Taylor
J
,
Wiedmann
L
,
Leibing
T
,
Nordstrom
V
, et al
.
Endothelial Notch signaling controls insulin transport in muscle
.
EMBO Mol Med
2020
;
12
:
e09271
.
15.
Ramasamy
SK
,
Kusumbe
AP
,
Wang
L
,
Adams
RH
.
Endothelial Notch activity promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone
.
Nature
2014
;
507
:
376
80
.
16.
Sorensen
I
,
Adams
RH
,
Gossler
A
.
DLL1-mediated Notch activation regulates endothelial identity in mouse fetal arteries
.
Blood
2009
;
113
:
5680
8
.
17.
Jabs
M
,
Rose
AJ
,
Lehmann
LH
,
Taylor
J
,
Moll
I
,
Sijmonsma
TP
, et al
.
Inhibition of endothelial notch signaling impairs fatty acid transport and leads to metabolic and vascular remodeling of the adult heart
.
Circulation
2018
;
137
:
2592
608
.
18.
Zhu
TS
,
Costello
MA
,
Talsma
CE
,
Flack
CG
,
Crowley
JG
,
Hamm
LL
, et al
.
Endothelial cells create a stem cell niche in glioblastoma by providing NOTCH ligands that nurture self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells
.
Cancer Res
2011
;
71
:
6061
72
.
19.
Alsina-Sanchis
E
,
Mulfarth
R
,
Moll
I
,
Mogler
C
,
Rodriguez-Vita
J
,
Fischer
A
.
Intraperitoneal oil application causes local inflammation with depletion of resident peritoneal macrophages
.
Mol Cancer Res
2021
;
19
:
288
300
.
20.
Sanjana
NE
,
Shalem
O
,
Zhang
F
.
Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening
.
Nat Methods
2014
;
11
:
783
4
.
21.
Lake
RJ
,
Tsai
PF
,
Choi
I
,
Won
KJ
,
Fan
HY
.
RBPJ, the major transcriptional effector of Notch signaling, remains associated with chromatin throughout mitosis, suggesting a role in mitotic bookmarking
.
PLoS Genet
2014
;
10
:
e1004204
.
22.
Szklarczyk
D
,
Gable
AL
,
Nastou
KC
,
Lyon
D
,
Kirsch
R
,
Pyysalo
S
, et al
.
The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2021
;
49
:
D605
D12
.
23.
Subramanian
A
,
Tamayo
P
,
Mootha
VK
,
Mukherjee
S
,
Ebert
BL
,
Gillette
MA
, et al
.
Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
15545
50
.
24.
Lanczky
A
,
Gyorffy
B
.
Web-based survival analysis tool tailored for medical research (KMplot): development and implementation
.
J Med Internet Res
2021
;
23
:
e27633
.
25.
Bartha
A
,
Gyorffy
B
.
TNMplot.com: a web tool for the comparison of gene expression in normal, tumor and metastatic tissues
.
Int J Mol Sci
2021
;
22
:
2622
.
26.
Etzerodt
A
,
Moulin
M
,
Doktor
TK
,
Delfini
M
,
Mossadegh-Keller
N
,
Bajenoff
M
, et al
.
Tissue-resident macrophages in omentum promote metastatic spread of ovarian cancer
.
J Exp Med
2020
;
217
:
e20191869
.
27.
Nus
M
,
Martinez-Poveda
B
,
MacGrogan
D
,
Chevre
R
,
D'Amato
G
,
Sbroggio
M
, et al
.
Endothelial Jag1-RBPJ signalling promotes inflammatory leucocyte recruitment and atherosclerosis
.
Cardiovasc Res
2016
;
112
:
568
80
.
28.
Verginelli
F
,
Adesso
L
,
Limon
I
,
Alisi
A
,
Gueguen
M
,
Panera
N
, et al
.
Activation of an endothelial Notch1-Jagged1 circuit induces VCAM1 expression, an effect amplified by interleukin-1beta
.
Oncotarget
2015
;
6
:
43216
29
.
29.
Jablonska
J
,
Wu
CF
,
Andzinski
L
,
Leschner
S
,
Weiss
S
.
CXCR2-mediated tumor-associated neutrophil recruitment is regulated by IFN-beta
.
Int J Cancer
2014
;
134
:
1346
58
.
30.
Taki
M
,
Abiko
K
,
Baba
T
,
Hamanishi
J
,
Yamaguchi
K
,
Murakami
R
, et al
.
Snail promotes ovarian cancer progression by recruiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells via CXCR2 ligand upregulation
.
Nat Commun
2018
;
9
:
1685
.
31.
Priego
N
,
Zhu
L
,
Monteiro
C
,
Mulders
M
,
Wasilewski
D
,
Bindeman
W
, et al
.
STAT3 labels a subpopulation of reactive astrocytes required for brain metastasis
.
Nat Med
2018
;
24
:
1024
35
.
32.
Cortes
M
,
Sanchez-Moral
L
,
de Barrios
O
,
Fernandez-Acenero
MJ
,
Martinez-Campanario
MC
,
Esteve-Codina
A
, et al
.
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) depend on ZEB1 for their cancer-promoting roles
.
EMBO J
2017
;
36
:
3336
55
.
33.
Gilliver
SC
,
Emmerson
E
,
Bernhagen
J
,
Hardman
MJ
.
MIF: a key player in cutaneous biology and wound healing
.
Exp Dermatol
2011
;
20
:
1
6
.
34.
Alban
TJ
,
Bayik
D
,
Otvos
B
,
Rabljenovic
A
,
Leng
L
,
Jia-Shiun
L
, et al
.
Glioblastoma myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets express differential macrophage migration inhibitory factor receptor profiles that can be targeted to reduce immune suppression
.
Front Immunol
2020
;
11
:
1191
.
35.
Shi
X
,
Leng
L
,
Wang
T
,
Wang
W
,
Du
X
,
Li
J
, et al
.
CD44 is the signaling component of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor-CD74 receptor complex
.
Immunity
2006
;
25
:
595
606
.
36.
Figueiredo
CR
,
Azevedo
RA
,
Mousdell
S
,
Resende-Lara
PT
,
Ireland
L
,
Santos
A
, et al
.
Blockade of MIF-CD74 signalling on macrophages and dendritic cells restores the antitumour immune response against metastatic melanoma
.
Front Immunol
2018
;
9
:
1132
.
37.
Przybyl
L
,
Haase
N
,
Golic
M
,
Rugor
J
,
Solano
ME
,
Arck
PC
, et al
.
CD74-downregulation of placental macrophage-trophoblastic interactions in preeclampsia
.
Circ Res
2016
;
119
:
55
68
.
38.
Moughon
DL
,
He
H
,
Schokrpur
S
,
Jiang
ZK
,
Yaqoob
M
,
David
J
, et al
.
Macrophage blockade using CSF1R inhibitors reverses the vascular leakage underlying malignant ascites in late-stage epithelial ovarian cancer
.
Cancer Res
2015
;
75
:
4742
52
.
39.
Zhang
F
,
Jiang
J
,
Xu
B
,
Xu
Y
,
Wu
C
.
Over-expression of CXCL2 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer
.
Medicine
2021
;
100
:
e24125
.
40.
Di Mitri
D
,
Mirenda
M
,
Vasilevska
J
,
Calcinotto
A
,
Delaleu
N
,
Revandkar
A
, et al
.
Re-education of tumor-associated macrophages by CXCR2 blockade drives senescence and tumor inhibition in advanced prostate cancer
.
Cell Rep
2019
;
28
:
2156
68
.
41.
Henriques
TB
,
Dos Santos
DZ
,
Dos Santos Guimaraes
I
,
Tessarollo
NG
,
Lyra-Junior
PCM
,
Mesquita
P
, et al
.
Inhibition of CXCR2 plays a pivotal role in re-sensitizing ovarian cancer to cisplatin treatment
.
Aging
2021
;
13
:
13405
20
.