Background: CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) combination therapy have improved outcomes in patients (pts) with hormonal receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, most pts eventually develop resistance to these drugs, and one third never respond. Aside from HR positivity, predictive markers of clinical benefit from CDK 4/6i remains elusive. We aimed to identify biomarkers of response to palbociclib (PAL) and analyze potential therapeutic targets to reverse resistance. Methods: PEARL trial is a multicenter phase 3 study that assigned 601 postmenopausal HR+/HER2- ABC pts, whose disease progressed on aromatase inhibitors (AIs), to receive PAL + ET vs capecitabine (CAPE). We performed a differential gene expression analysis in pre-treatment tumors in extreme responders to PAL using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel (HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.), containing 2534 cancer related genes. Samples were subset in 2 categories: refractory (progressive disease as best response) vs sensitive (progression-free survival (PFS) within the upper quartile). Cox regression and Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) analysis adjusting for multiple comparisons were performed. Results: We analyzed 455 (75.7%) pts with pre-treatment tumors available [from them, PAL + ET arm: 229 (50.3%) pts; CAPE arm: 226 (49.7%) pts]. Fifty genes (false discovery rate (FDR)<0.05) were differentially expressed in pts sensitive vs refractory to PAL (E2F target genes, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell cycle genes, mainly). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of pts based on the expression of these genes revealed two clusters. Cluster 1 is composed mostly of resistant tumors, highly proliferative (Ki67≥20%: 70%) with a great proportion of luminal B (59%) and non-luminal tumors (19%). Cluster 2 is composed of sensitive, low proliferative (Ki67<20%: 58%), mostly luminal A tumors (75%). There was no difference in ESR1 mutations distribution between the two clusters (Table 1). Forty genes were up-regulated and associated with resistance, including CCNE1 and PLK1 (Polo Like Kinase 1). In the whole cohort, pts with high levels (> median) of PLK1 (PLK1-high) treated with PAL, had a worse PFS in a multivariate model (5.7 months (m) vs 9.3 m of median PFS in PLK1-High vs -Low; HR=1.64, 95% CI (1.25-2.34), p=0.0008; adjusted model for confounders: age, site of disease, sites of metastasis, prior chemotherapy and Ki67). There were no differences in population treated with CAPE (9.9 m vs 9.4 m, PLK1-High vs -Low; HR=0.82, 95% CI (0.56-1.21), p=0.3189). In the METABRIC cohort, PLK1-High was associated with worse overall survival in HR+/HER2- BC but not in triple negative nor in HER2+ tumors. Among HR+/HER2- tumors, PLK1 expression was higher in luminal B and HER2-enriched intrinsic subtypes. We interrogated DepMap database and found that in BC cells lines there was an inverse correlation between PLK1 expression and effect on cell viability of CDK4 CRISPR knock-out (Pearson correlation r:0.54, p=0.009), but not of CDK6 knock-out. Also, HR+/HER2-/High Ki67 BC cell lines (HCC1428, EFM19 and MCF7) showed resistance to PAL on cell proliferation assays but sensitivity to the PLK1 inhibitor BI-2536. Conclusion: High expression of PLK1 is associated with intrinsic resistance to PAL and ET, this might be overcome with PLK1 inhibition.

Table 1

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS    
 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 ALL 
 n=57 n=47 n=104 
Responders    
Sensitive 42 (73.68%) 14 (29.79%) 56 (53.85%) 
Refractory 15 (26.32%) 33 (70.21%) 48 (46.15%) 
ESR1    
Mutated 9 (15.79%) 13 (27.66%) 22 (21.15%) 
Wild type 45 (78.95%) 34 (72.34%) 79 (75.96%) 
Unknown 3 (5.26%) 0 (0%) 3 (2.88%) 
PriorQT    
42 (73.68%) 31 (65.96%) 73 (70.19%) 
15 (26.32%) 16 (34.04%) 31 (29.81%) 
Subtype    
LumA 43 (75.44%) 10 (21.28%) 53 (50.96%) 
LumB 14 (24.56%) 28 (59.57%) 42 (40.38%) 
Non Luminal 0 (0%) 9 (19.15%) 9 (8.65%) 
Metastasis    
One 21 (36.84%) 15 (31.91%) 36 (34.62%) 
Multiple 36 (63.16%) 32 (68.09%) 68 (65.38%) 
KI67 20%    
KI67<20 33 (57.89%) 7 (14.89%) 40 (38.46%) 
KI67≥20 16 (28.07%) 33 (70.21%) 49 (47.12%) 
Unknown 8 (14.04%) 7 (14.89%) 15 (14.42%) 
Objective Response    
Complete 1 (1.75%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.96%) 
Partial 16 (28.07%) 6 (12.77%) 22 (21.15%) 
Progressive 15 (26.32%) 33 (70.21%) 48 (46.15%) 
Stable 25 (43.86%) 8 (17.02%) 33 (31.73%) 
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS    
 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 ALL 
 n=57 n=47 n=104 
Responders    
Sensitive 42 (73.68%) 14 (29.79%) 56 (53.85%) 
Refractory 15 (26.32%) 33 (70.21%) 48 (46.15%) 
ESR1    
Mutated 9 (15.79%) 13 (27.66%) 22 (21.15%) 
Wild type 45 (78.95%) 34 (72.34%) 79 (75.96%) 
Unknown 3 (5.26%) 0 (0%) 3 (2.88%) 
PriorQT    
42 (73.68%) 31 (65.96%) 73 (70.19%) 
15 (26.32%) 16 (34.04%) 31 (29.81%) 
Subtype    
LumA 43 (75.44%) 10 (21.28%) 53 (50.96%) 
LumB 14 (24.56%) 28 (59.57%) 42 (40.38%) 
Non Luminal 0 (0%) 9 (19.15%) 9 (8.65%) 
Metastasis    
One 21 (36.84%) 15 (31.91%) 36 (34.62%) 
Multiple 36 (63.16%) 32 (68.09%) 68 (65.38%) 
KI67 20%    
KI67<20 33 (57.89%) 7 (14.89%) 40 (38.46%) 
KI67≥20 16 (28.07%) 33 (70.21%) 49 (47.12%) 
Unknown 8 (14.04%) 7 (14.89%) 15 (14.42%) 
Objective Response    
Complete 1 (1.75%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.96%) 
Partial 16 (28.07%) 6 (12.77%) 22 (21.15%) 
Progressive 15 (26.32%) 33 (70.21%) 48 (46.15%) 
Stable 25 (43.86%) 8 (17.02%) 33 (31.73%) 

Citation Format: Angel Guerrero- Zotano, Christoph Zielinski, Miguel Gil-Gil, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Eva M. Ciruelos, Montserrat Munoz, Begoña Bermejo, Mireia Margeli, Antonio Antón, Tibor Csöszi, Andrés García-Palomo, Ana Santaballa, Jose Luis Alonso, Antonio Fernández, Massimo Corsaro, Jesús Herranz, Paula López, Rosalia Caballero, Christiane Thallinger, Miguel Martin. Plk1 expression & efficacy of palbociclib in advanced hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer patients from PEARL study (GEICAM 2012-03) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-01.