Tumor hypoxia levels range from mild to severe and have different biological and therapeutical consequences but are not easily assessable in patients. Here we present a method based on diagnostic dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI that reflects a continuous range of hypoxia levels in patients with tumors of cervical cancer. Hypoxia images were generated using an established approach based on pixel-wise combination of DCE-MRI parameters νe and Ktrans, representing oxygen consumption and supply, respectively. Using two tumor models, an algorithm to retrieve surrogate measures of hypoxia levels from the images was developed and validated by comparing the MRI-defined levels with hypoxia levels reflected in pimonidazole-stained histologic sections. An additional indicator of hypoxia levels in patient tumors was established on the basis of expression of nine hypoxia-responsive genes; a strong correlation was found between these indicator values and MRI-defined hypoxia levels in 63 patients. Chemoradiotherapy outcome of 74 patients was most strongly predicted by moderate hypoxia levels, whereas more severe or milder levels were less predictive. By combining gene expression profiles and MRI-defined hypoxia levels in cancer hallmark analysis, we identified a distribution of levels associated with each hallmark; oxidative phosphorylation and G2–M checkpoint were associated with moderate hypoxia, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and inflammatory responses with significantly more severe levels. At the mildest levels, IFN response hallmarks together with HIF1A protein expression by IHC appeared significant. Thus, our method visualizes the distribution of hypoxia levels within patient tumors and has potential to distinguish levels of different prognostic and biological significance.

Significance:

These findings present an approach to image a continuous range of hypoxia levels in tumors and demonstrate the combination of imaging with molecular data to better understand the biology behind these different levels.

Solid tumors show a highly heterogeneous oxygen distribution with hypoxia levels ranging from mild to moderate and severe (1). The hypoxia level determines resistance to cancer therapies like radiation, chemotherapy, and many molecular targeting drugs (1–4), and may therefore have large therapeutical consequences. Current understanding of how the different levels drive cancer progression and affect treatment response is scarce and mostly based on experimental studies (5–7). At mild hypoxia, around 2% O2, activation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor HIF1 promotes metabolic reprogramming and cell survival (8, 9). More severe levels, below 1% O2, may impair cell proliferation and lead to genomic instability (10, 11), and below 0.5% O2, the cytotoxic effect of radiation is more than 2-fold reduced (2). Hypoxia may also induce epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and immune evasion of tumor cells (12, 13), but the levels of importance for these processes are not known. In patient tumors, earlier investigations using invasive electrodes to measure oxygen partial pressure (pO2) have shown considerable differences across cancer types in the level most strongly associated with treatment outcome, ranging from 2.5 to 10 mmHg or approximately 0.3%–1.3% O2 (14). More recent clinical work has almost exclusively focused on the presence or absence of hypoxia (15), mainly because oxygen electrodes are not feasible and alternative approaches to assess hypoxia levels are lacking. A method based on medical imaging would facilitate investigations of how individual levels relate to treatment outcome and tumor biology in patients, and help development of more efficient therapies to combat hypoxia.

Hypoxia occurs in tumors due to impaired oxygen supply by a chaotic vascular network and/or elevated oxygen consumption in regions with high cellularity (1). We recently presented a tool for pixel-wise combination of images reflecting oxygen consumption with images reflecting oxygen supply into images representing hypoxia (16). The consumption and supply-based hypoxia (CSH)-imaging tool was originally developed in patients with prostate cancer, using images of the apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional blood volume derived from diffusion weighted (DW) MR images. The information in the two images was utilized to reflect the difference between oxygen consumption and supply and thereby the probability of each pixel to locate in a hypoxic region. Although only the presence of hypoxia was addressed in this study, it is likely that a difference between oxygen consumption and supply within a tumor region also would provide information on hypoxia level. The CSH-principle may therefore be a basis for establishing an imaging approach for hypoxia levels.

Locally advanced cervical cancer is a disease for which better biological understanding and therapeutical approaches to overcome hypoxia are urgent (17, 18). In this work, we aimed to construct images that reflect a continuous distribution of hypoxia levels in cervical tumors by applying the CSH-tool. Our approach was based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI, because this modality is state-of-the-art diagnostics for the disease. We showed that the DCE-MRI parameters νe and Ktrans from the Tofts pharmacokinetic model (19) reflected oxygen consumption and supply, respectively, and could be successfully combined to generate hypoxia images in xenograft and patient tumors. We further developed an algorithm to assign surrogate measures of hypoxia levels to all pixels. The algorithm was validated by comparison with hypoxia levels reflected in pimonidazole-stained sections in xenograft tumors and hypoxia-related gene expression in patient tumors. The power of this approach was demonstrated by presenting the distribution of hypoxia levels in tumors of 74 patients and distinguishing levels associated with treatment outcome, a set of cancer hallmarks and stabilization of HIF1A protein.

Clinical cohort

Totally 74 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma, prospectively recruited to our chemoradiotherapy protocol, were included (Supplementary Table S1). Gene expression profiles and a gene score reflecting hypoxia were available from previous work (20) for 63 patients, and paraffin-embedded tissue sections for IHC were available for 73 patients. The gene score was based on the expression level of six hypoxia-responsive genes and increased with increasing amount of hypoxia (20). All patients received external radiotherapy combined with cisplatin (40 mg/m2 weekly), intracavitary brachytherapy and follow-up as described previously (20). The study was approved by the institutional review board and the Regional Committee for Medical Health Research Ethics in southern Norway. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Cell lines and hypoxia treatment

HeLa and SiHa cervical cancer cell lines from ATCC were used. Confirmation of cell line identity and cell culturing were performed as described previously (21). Mycoplasma testing was conducted regularly and always prior to cryopreservation. Totally 1.5 × 106 HeLa and 1.7 × 106 SiHa cells in passages 5–20 after thawing were reseeded in 10-cm plastic dishes 24 hours before exposure to hypoxia at 0.2%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5% O2 for 24 hours at 37°C, all with 5% CO2, by using an Invivo2200 chamber (Ruskinn Technology Ltd.). Normoxic controls (95% air, 5% CO2) were included for all hypoxia experiments.

Human tumor xenografts

HeLa and SiHa cervical cancer xenograft tumors were established in female nude mice, bred at the animal department of our institute and kept in specific pathogen-free environment, with food and water supplied ad libitum. Totally 1 × 106 HeLa cells or 2 × 106 SiHa cells in passages 5–8 after thawing were suspended in 20 μL or 40 μL of Hank balanced salt solution and injected intramuscularly in both hind legs of adult mice. Tumor growth was monitored with anatomic T2-weighted MRI. At the day of DCE-MRI, the hypoxia marker pimonidazole (60 mg/kg; Hypoxyprobe, Inc.) was administered intraperitoneally prior to MR scanning in 16 HeLa and 12 SiHa tumors. After the scan, 90–120 minutes after pimonidazole injection, the mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation, and the tumors were excised, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded for IHC. All procedures were approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority and performed in accordance with guidelines on animal welfare of the Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations.

DCE-MRI

DCE-MRI of xenograft tumors was performed at a volume of 100–800 mm3, using a 7.05 T Biospec bore magnet (Bruker) and a fast bolus injection of 5.0 mL/kg body weight Gd-DOTA (Dotarem, Guerbet; Supplementary Method S1). Totally 8 images prior to and 57 images postinjection of Gd-DOTA were acquired with an axial T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled sequence (SPGR). The images had a spatial resolution of 234 × 234 × 1,000 μm3. The three most central tumor slices were analyzed.

In patients, DCE-MRI was performed at diagnosis, using a 1.5 T Signa Horizon LX tomograph (GE Medical Systems) with a pelvic phased array coil and a fast bolus injection of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight Gd-DTPA (Magnevist, Schering; Supplementary Method S1). Totally 1–2 series prior to and 12–13 series postinjection of Gd-DTPA were acquired with an axial T1-weighted SPGR sequence. The images had a pixel size of 780 × 780 μm2, slice thickness of 5 mm, and slice gap of 1 mm. All slices containing tumor were analyzed.

Hypoxia images

The tumors were outlined in T2-weigthed MR images and coregistered with DCE-MR images. Pharmacokinetic analysis of contrast uptake curves obtained from the DCE-MR images was performed on a pixel-by-pixel basis using Tofts model (19) (Supplementary Method S1), and parametric images of Ktrans and νe were generated. To construct hypoxia images, the CSH-tool was applied on the Ktrans and νe images as described for DW-MRI (16). Hence, a pixel-wise plot of Ktrans versus νe was generated for each tumor, representing decreasing oxygen consumption on the horizontal νe-axis and increasing oxygen supply on the vertical Ktrans-axis. To determine a threshold for hypoxia, a line discriminating pixels in hypoxic and nonhypoxic regions, and thus defining the hypoxic fraction, was determined in an iterative procedure with all tumors, using an independent hypoxia measure as learning variable. The hypoxic fraction was calculated for each tumor and iteration, and correlated with the independent hypoxia measure. The optimal line was determined by the highest Pearson correlation coefficient and was described by its intersections with the horizontal (νe0) and vertical axes (K0trans).

IHC and digital histopathology

Adjacent sections, 4–5 μm thick, from xenograft tumors were stained for hypoxia (n = 28), using a pimonidazole polyclonal rabbit antibody (1:3,500; Hypoxyprobe Inc.) and endothelial cells (n = 26), using a CD31 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:50, ab28364; Abcam). Hematoxylin was used as counterstain to visualize cell nuclei. Digital histopathology was performed to quantify hypoxic fraction (HFPimo), cell density (CD), and blood vessel density (BVD; Supplementary Method S1). Sections from 73 patient tumors were stained with the monoclonal mouse HIF1A antibody clone 54 (1:25, no. 610958; BD Transduction Laboratories), as described previously (21). Percentage of HIF1A-positive tumor cells was scored manually based on nuclear staining: 0, 0%; 1, 1%–10%; 2, 11%–25%; 3, 26%–50%; 4, 51%–75%; and 5, >75%.

Gene expression

Gene expression profiling of HeLa and SiHa cells exposed to hypoxia at 0.2%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5% O2 and normoxia (95% air) was carried out using Illumina bead arrays HT-12 v4 (Illumina Inc.). Total RNA was isolated using miRNeasy MiniKit (Qiagen). Complementary RNA was synthesized, labeled, and hybridized to the arrays. Signal extraction and quantile normalization were performed using software provided by the manufacturer (Illumina Inc.). The data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE147384). Normalized gene expression profiles of 63 patients, generated previously using Illumina bead arrays WG-6 v3 (Illumina Inc.; ref. 20), were downloaded from GEO (GSE72723).

Statistical analysis

To compare hypoxic fractions derived from MR images and pimonidazole-stained sections, an adapted version of Pearson correlation test for similarity between two datasets was applied (22):

where x and y are sets of hypoxic fractions from MRI and pimonidazole, respectively, var(x) and var(y) are set variances and n is the set size of 28 tumors. The function is equal to 1 when the hypoxic fractions from the two modalities are perfectly correlated with a slope of 1. In cases of poor correlation or a slope deviating from 1, the similarity decreases.

Curve fitting was performed by regression analysis. Student t test was used for comparison of parametric data between groups, otherwise, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was applied. Linear associations were estimated by Pearson correlation. Association between hypoxic fraction and gene expression data was based on Spearman rank correlation. A cut-off P-value of 0.05 was used to achieve an appropriate number of genes for further analysis. To avoid unreliable associations caused by outliers, the analysis was repeated after removing the lowest and highest expression value of each gene. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on the basis of 50 hallmark gene sets in the Molecular Signature Database, using an adjusted P-value of q < 0.05 to evaluate statistical significance. Clinical endpoint was progression-free survival defined as time from diagnosis to disease-related death or first occurrence of relapse. Patients were censored at their last appointment or at 5 years. Cox univariate proportional hazard analysis was performed, and Kaplan–Meier curves were compared using log-rank test. P-values of P < 0.05 were considered significant unless otherwise stated. The statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot and SPSS.

MRI-based hypoxia images provide measures of hypoxic fraction

The possibility to construct hypoxia images from DCE-MR images was investigated in xenograft tumors by first examining whether νe and Ktrans could be used to reflect oxygen consumption and supply. Images of νe and Ktrans displayed resemblance with those of the histopathology parameters CD and BVD, respectively, with some disagreement possibly due to a 200-fold difference in slice thickness (Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B). Consistent with these observations, histogram analyses based on the DCE-MR and histopathology parametric images of all tumors showed negative correlations between νe and CD and positive correlations between Ktrans and BVD for almost all percentiles, including the median values (R2 = 0.17, P = 0.03 and R2 = 0.46, P < 0.0005, respectively; Supplementary Fig. S2A and S2B). No significant correlation was found between νe and BVD or between Ktrans and CD (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Hypoxic fraction determined by pimonidazole staining (HFPimo) was correlated with both νe (R2 = 0.46, P < 0.00005) and Ktrans (R2 = 0.22, P < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. S3B). νe and Ktrans therefore seemed to be connected to hypoxia and contain different information related to oxygen consumption and supply, respectively, in line with other DCE-MRI studies using low molecular weight contrast agents (23).

On the basis of the above results, we searched to construct hypoxia images in xenograft tumors by combining images of νe and Ktrans and using HFPimo as independent measure of hypoxia. In pixel-wise plots of Ktrans versus νe, pixels from tumors having a high HFPimo were in general located more toward the lower left corner than pixels from tumors with a low HFPimo (Fig. 1A and B), consistent with the CSH-principle. The line that best discriminated pixels in hypoxic and nonhypoxic regions for all tumors combined was determined (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Pixels below the optimal line were considered hypoxic and the fraction of these pixels, HFMRI, was strongly correlated to HFPimo (R2 = 0.57, P < 0.000005; Fig. 1C). This correlation was stronger than between νe or Ktrans and HFPimo (Supplementary Fig. S3). The resulting binary hypoxia images showed strong resemblance to the pimonidazole-stained sections (Fig. 1B and D).

Figure 1.

Construction of hypoxia images in xenograft and patient tumors. A, Pixel-wise plot of Ktrans versus νe for a xenograft tumor with high hypoxic fraction according to pimonidazole staining (HFPimo; red) and another with low HFPimo (blue). The optimal discrimination line separating pixels in hypoxic and nonhypoxic regions is shown. B, Pimonidazole-stained sections of the tumors presented in A. C, Scatter plot of HFMRI versus HFPimo for 28 xenograft tumors based on the optimal discrimination line. D, Binary hypoxia images visualizing HFMRI of the tumors presented in A and B. E, Scatter plot of HFMRI versus hypoxia gene score for 63 patient tumors based on the optimal discrimination line. F, Binary hypoxia images visualizing HFMRI of a less and a more hypoxic tumor according to the hypoxia gene score. C and E, Curve, P-value and correlation coefficient (R2) from linear correlation analysis are shown. D and F, The binary images are overlaid on axial T2-weighted images.

Figure 1.

Construction of hypoxia images in xenograft and patient tumors. A, Pixel-wise plot of Ktrans versus νe for a xenograft tumor with high hypoxic fraction according to pimonidazole staining (HFPimo; red) and another with low HFPimo (blue). The optimal discrimination line separating pixels in hypoxic and nonhypoxic regions is shown. B, Pimonidazole-stained sections of the tumors presented in A. C, Scatter plot of HFMRI versus HFPimo for 28 xenograft tumors based on the optimal discrimination line. D, Binary hypoxia images visualizing HFMRI of the tumors presented in A and B. E, Scatter plot of HFMRI versus hypoxia gene score for 63 patient tumors based on the optimal discrimination line. F, Binary hypoxia images visualizing HFMRI of a less and a more hypoxic tumor according to the hypoxia gene score. C and E, Curve, P-value and correlation coefficient (R2) from linear correlation analysis are shown. D and F, The binary images are overlaid on axial T2-weighted images.

Close modal

To confirm applicability of the CSH-tool to produce hypoxia images in patient tumors, the same procedure was applied to pixel-wise plots of Ktrans versus νe generated from the clinical images (Supplementary Fig. S4B and S5A). Similar to what we observed in xenografts, pixels from hypoxic tumors appeared to be located toward the lower left corner in these plots (Supplementary Fig. S5B). By using the gene score from previous work (20) as independent hypoxia measure, an optimal line to discriminate pixels in hypoxic and nonhypoxic regions for all tumors combined was determined (Supplementary Fig. S4B), and a HFMRI was calculated for each tumor. A strong correlation between HFMRI and hypoxia gene score (R2 = 0.27, P < 0.00001; Fig. 1E and F) was found. This correlation was stronger than between νe or Ktrans and gene score (Supplementary Fig. S6A). In analysis of all 74 patients, HFMRI was strongly correlated with progression-free survival, where patients with high HFMRI had poor outcome compared with the others (P = 0.0014; Supplementary Fig. S6B), consistent with the prognostic significance of the gene score (20). The correlation to outcome was weaker for Ktrans or νe (P = 0.015 and P = 0.074, respectively; Supplementary Fig. S6B). All together, this showed that hypoxia images could be constructed using the DCE-MRI parameters νe and Ktrans as input to the CSH-tool.

Hypoxia levels defined by pimonidazole staining in xenograft tumors are visualized by MRI

On the basis of the hypoxia images, an algorithm was developed that transferred the νe and Ktrans information of each pixel into a single value representing the hypoxia level. A dimensional reduction approach was utilized, where each point in the plot of Ktrans versus νe was projected onto the axis orthogonal to the optimal discrimination line. The use of this approach was based on a hypothesis that the location of a pixel in the plot; that is, the distance from the pixel to the optimal discrimination line, depends on the hypoxia level of the corresponding tumor region (Fig. 2A). This hypothesis is likely because the line represents the weighted information of Ktrans (oxygen supply) and νe (oxygen consumption) underlying the level of the independent hypoxia measure. The hypoxia level, HLMRI, can thus be expressed as:

where the level of the optimal line, described by the intersection points νe0 and K0trans, was set to zero, and increasing values of HLMRI indicated more severe hypoxia. Application of the algorithm to calculate four hypoxia levels is shown in Fig. 2B, together with the underlying HLMRI image (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.

Indicator of hypoxia levels in xenograft tumors. A, Principle of assessing hypoxia levels (HLMRI) from hypoxia images as the distance from the pixel to the optimal discrimination line (HLMRI = 0). B, Pixel-wise plot of Ktrans versus νe of a xenograft tumor. The solid line indicates the optimal discrimination line (HLMRI = 0), whereas the stippled lines in parallel represent three different hypoxia levels, that is, different HLMRI values. Points are color-coded according to their HLMRI value. C, Hypoxia image of the tumor presented in B, overlaid on an axial T2-weighted image. D, Pimonidazole-staining intensity in histologic sections from a xenograft tumor versus distance from necrosis. The histologic section is shown above. E, Pimonidazole-stained section of the tumor presented in B and C. F, Color-coded pimonidazole-based image of hypoxia levels, HLPimo, for the tumor presented in B, C, and E.

Figure 2.

Indicator of hypoxia levels in xenograft tumors. A, Principle of assessing hypoxia levels (HLMRI) from hypoxia images as the distance from the pixel to the optimal discrimination line (HLMRI = 0). B, Pixel-wise plot of Ktrans versus νe of a xenograft tumor. The solid line indicates the optimal discrimination line (HLMRI = 0), whereas the stippled lines in parallel represent three different hypoxia levels, that is, different HLMRI values. Points are color-coded according to their HLMRI value. C, Hypoxia image of the tumor presented in B, overlaid on an axial T2-weighted image. D, Pimonidazole-staining intensity in histologic sections from a xenograft tumor versus distance from necrosis. The histologic section is shown above. E, Pimonidazole-stained section of the tumor presented in B and C. F, Color-coded pimonidazole-based image of hypoxia levels, HLPimo, for the tumor presented in B, C, and E.

Close modal

A procedure to extract hypoxia levels from pimonidazole-stained tumor sections in xenografts was developed for validation of the algorithm. In vitro studies have shown that the binding efficacy of pimonidazole during hypoxia increases exponentially with decreasing oxygen concentration (24). In line with this, the pimonidazole-staining intensity was generally strongest close to necrotic regions (anoxia) and decreased with increasing distance from necrosis (Fig. 2D), most likely reflecting a hypoxia gradient. We therefore assumed that the staining intensity was proportional to hypoxia level, and produced pimonidazole-based images reflecting hypoxia levels (HLPimo) for the validation (Fig. 2E and F; Supplementary Method S1). Visual inspection showed large resemblance between the HLMRI and HLPimo images (Fig. 2C and F), although there was a considerable difference in slice thickness between the two modalities. By this inspection, we further found that the staining intensity in pimonidazole-based images could be evaluated down to a HLPimo of 0.38. Below this limit, the intensity was weak with small changes, probably reflecting nonhypoxic levels.

Hypoxia levels from MR- and pimonidazole-based images (Fig. 2C and F) were compared in 28 xenografts. By varying the threshold for HLMRI, from 0.11 in severe hypoxia to −0.05 at the mildest level, and for HLPimo, from 2.6 at the strongest staining intensity to 0.01 in the weakly stained region, we generated sets of hypoxic fractions (% of tumor >HLMRI or HLPimo) for both modalities and all xenografts (Fig. 3A). The two datasets, each consisting of 28 × 200 hypoxic fractions, were first compared using similarity analysis, where we for each HLMRI threshold identified the HLPimo threshold that led to the highest similarity between hypoxic fraction derived by the two modalities (Fig. 3B). Overall, the similarity values were high (>0.6) and an exponential relationship was observed between similarity-matched HLMRI and HLPimo, presented as a linear relationship in a log-plot in Fig. 3C. This relationship is consistent with the exponential binding of pimonidazole with decreasing oxygen concentration (24). Correlation analysis of the most similar hypoxic fractions indicated how well HLMRI reflected different hypoxia levels. A strong correlation (P < 0.001) was found for HLMRI in the range of −0.03 to 0.1 (Fig. 3C), showing that hypoxic fraction from a large range of levels could be measured. Within this range, the mean hypoxic fraction based on all 28 xenograft tumors displayed considerable differences, ranging from 0.38 at mild hypoxia (HLMRI = −0.03; Fig. 3D) to 0.07 at more severe hypoxia (HLMRI = 0.06; Fig. 3E) and 0.02 at the most severe levels (HLMRI = 0.1). These results supported that our algorithm to image hypoxia levels was reliable. Furthermore, the MRI-defined hypoxia levels could distinguish a large range of hypoxic fractions in xenograft tumors.

Figure 3.

Assessing surrogate measures of hypoxia levels in xenograft tumors. A, Examples of binary MR- and pimonidazole-based images, visualizing hypoxic fractions for four different HLMRI and HLPimo thresholds of the tumor presented in Fig. 2C and F. B, Similarity plots for the HLMRI thresholds indicated in A, showing the similarity between MRI- and pimonidazole-based hypoxic fractions versus HLPimo threshold. Each plot is based on 28 tumors. The highest similarity is marked for each HLMRI threshold. C,HLMRI versus HLPimo for totally 200 thresholds. Each point represents similarity-matched HLMRI and HLPimo thresholds, that is, HLMRI and HLPimo, leading to the highest similarity in the analysis presented in B. The four HLMRI thresholds shown in A are indicated with solid symbols together with the correlation coefficient (R2) and curve from linear correlation analysis. D and E, Scatterplots of MRI-based versus pimonidazole-based hypoxic fraction for a HLMRI threshold of −0.03 (D) and 0.06 (E). Similarity-matched HLMRI and HLPimo were used to calculate hypoxic fractions for 28 xenograft tumors. Each point represents hypoxic fraction of a tumor at the indicated hypoxia level (HLMRI threshold). Mean MRI-based hypoxic fraction for all 28 tumors is 0.38 in D and 0.07 in E. Curve, P-value, and correlation coefficient (R2) from linear correlation analysis are shown.

Figure 3.

Assessing surrogate measures of hypoxia levels in xenograft tumors. A, Examples of binary MR- and pimonidazole-based images, visualizing hypoxic fractions for four different HLMRI and HLPimo thresholds of the tumor presented in Fig. 2C and F. B, Similarity plots for the HLMRI thresholds indicated in A, showing the similarity between MRI- and pimonidazole-based hypoxic fractions versus HLPimo threshold. Each plot is based on 28 tumors. The highest similarity is marked for each HLMRI threshold. C,HLMRI versus HLPimo for totally 200 thresholds. Each point represents similarity-matched HLMRI and HLPimo thresholds, that is, HLMRI and HLPimo, leading to the highest similarity in the analysis presented in B. The four HLMRI thresholds shown in A are indicated with solid symbols together with the correlation coefficient (R2) and curve from linear correlation analysis. D and E, Scatterplots of MRI-based versus pimonidazole-based hypoxic fraction for a HLMRI threshold of −0.03 (D) and 0.06 (E). Similarity-matched HLMRI and HLPimo were used to calculate hypoxic fractions for 28 xenograft tumors. Each point represents hypoxic fraction of a tumor at the indicated hypoxia level (HLMRI threshold). Mean MRI-based hypoxic fraction for all 28 tumors is 0.38 in D and 0.07 in E. Curve, P-value, and correlation coefficient (R2) from linear correlation analysis are shown.

Close modal

Hypoxia levels defined by gene expression in patient tumors are visualized by MRI

Because pimonidazole-stained histologic sections were not available for the clinical cohort, we constructed an indicator of hypoxia levels based on the expression of hypoxia-responsive genes to confirm the validity of our algorithm in patient tumors. We utilized that genes may be activated and, thus, show increased expression, at specific oxygen concentrations (25). Nine indicator genes were selected among 31 previously identified hypoxia-responsive genes in cervical cancer (21; Supplementary Document S1). The genes are regulated by HIF1 (AK4, PFKFB4, P4HA2), by both HIF1 and the unfolded protein response (STC2, ERO1A) or by unknown mechanisms (UPK1A, KCTD11, SNTA1, PYGL). By exposure of SiHa and HeLa cells to oxygen concentrations in the range of 0.2%–21% O2, the concentration for half-maximal response was recorded for each gene (Fig. 4A and B), in a similar way as described for stabilization of HIF1A protein (8). This cell line–derived hypoxia activation level ranged from 0.55% to 1.81% O2 (Fig. 4C; Supplementary Document S1). The HIF1A targets AK4 and PFKFB4 had the highest level, consistent with an HIF1 activation level of 1.5%–2.0% O2 (8). Thus, the indicator genes showed a range of levels likely to be found in human tumors (6) and broad enough for testing our algorithm.

Figure 4.

Assessing surrogate measures of hypoxia levels in patient tumors. A and B, Gene expression in HeLa (A) and SiHa (B) cell lines versus the logarithm of oxygen concentration for two indicator genes, KCTD11 and PKFKB4. The expression levels are plotted relative to the level of normoxic controls (21% O2). Hypoxia activation level (stippled line) and curve from linear correlation analysis (solid line) are indicated for each gene. C, Hypoxia activation level of nine indicator genes. Bars, range of data for SiHa and HeLa cell line. D, Hypoxia level image (HLMRI) of a patient tumor overlaid on an axial T2-weighted image. E,P-value from correlation analysis of hypoxic fraction calculated for a set of 200 HLMRI thresholds versus gene expression in 63 patients, plotted as a function of HLMRI. Data for two indicator genes KCTD11 and PKFKB4 are shown. The HLMRI value leading to the strongest correlation (i.e., lowest P-value) is indicated for each gene. F,HLMRI for the strongest correlation achieved in E versus hypoxia gene activation level in cell lines for nine indicator genes. HLMRI was measured in 63 patient tumors, whereas hypoxia gene activation level was measured in SiHa and HeLa cell lines. Point and bar, average value and range for SiHa and HeLa cell lines. Curve, P-value and correlation coefficient (R2) from linear correlation analysis are shown.

Figure 4.

Assessing surrogate measures of hypoxia levels in patient tumors. A and B, Gene expression in HeLa (A) and SiHa (B) cell lines versus the logarithm of oxygen concentration for two indicator genes, KCTD11 and PKFKB4. The expression levels are plotted relative to the level of normoxic controls (21% O2). Hypoxia activation level (stippled line) and curve from linear correlation analysis (solid line) are indicated for each gene. C, Hypoxia activation level of nine indicator genes. Bars, range of data for SiHa and HeLa cell line. D, Hypoxia level image (HLMRI) of a patient tumor overlaid on an axial T2-weighted image. E,P-value from correlation analysis of hypoxic fraction calculated for a set of 200 HLMRI thresholds versus gene expression in 63 patients, plotted as a function of HLMRI. Data for two indicator genes KCTD11 and PKFKB4 are shown. The HLMRI value leading to the strongest correlation (i.e., lowest P-value) is indicated for each gene. F,HLMRI for the strongest correlation achieved in E versus hypoxia gene activation level in cell lines for nine indicator genes. HLMRI was measured in 63 patient tumors, whereas hypoxia gene activation level was measured in SiHa and HeLa cell lines. Point and bar, average value and range for SiHa and HeLa cell lines. Curve, P-value and correlation coefficient (R2) from linear correlation analysis are shown.

Close modal

HLMRI images were constructed for all 74 patient tumors (Fig. 4D). Using the same strategy as for xenografts, a set of 200 hypoxic fractions was calculated for each tumor using HLMRI thresholds ranging from 0.1 in severe hypoxia to −0.3 as the mildest level. Expression data of the nine indicator genes were further retrieved from the gene expression profiles of each tumor. A correlation analysis of the two datasets was performed, where we for each indicator gene identified the HLMRI threshold that led to the strongest association between hypoxic fraction and expression (Fig. 4E; Supplementary Document S1). These HLMRI thresholds showed a strong correlation to the cell line–derived hypoxia activation level of the nine indicator genes (Fig. 4F; R2 = 0.84, P < 0.0005). Although oxygen concentrations for half-maximal response in cell lines are not directly transferable to patient tumors, this relationship together with the above xenograft results strongly supported that HLMRI provided a continuous, linear surrogate measure of hypoxia levels in tumors.

Hypoxia levels of prognostic significance are distinguished in MR images

The relationship presented in Fig. 4F provided a tool to relate MRI-defined hypoxia levels in individual patient tumors to levels derived in cell lines. Aided by the relationship, we defined approximate HLMRI intervals for severe, moderate, and mild hypoxia to characterize the hypoxia level distributions (Fig. 5A). The definitions corresponded roughly to those proposed by others (6). Median HLMRI of all tumors combined was −0.08. This value was related to a cell line–derived level of 1.3% O2 (Fig. 5A) and within the moderate hypoxia range. Moreover, the median value differed considerably across tumors, ranging from −0.22 (2.3% O2) in mild hypoxia to 0.004 (0.8% O2) in moderate hypoxia. A pie chart of each tumor was generated to visualize these differences, showing fraction of pixels within HLMRI intervals of 0.05 (Fig. 5B; Supplementary Fig. S7). Most tumors contained a range from severe to nonhypoxic levels, however, fraction of the different levels varied considerably across patients.

Figure 5.

MRI-defined hypoxia levels in patient tumors in relation to treatment outcome. A, Approximate HLMRI intervals for severe, moderate, and mild hypoxia based on the relationship between HLMRI and hypoxia gene activation level in cell lines presented in Fig. 4F. The colored column represents the linear curve in Fig. 4F. Stippled lines indicate median hypoxia level (HLMRI = −0.08) for all patient tumors combined and the hypoxia level with the strongest correlation to progression-free survival (HLMRI = 0.01) in the analysis presented in C. B, Pie charts showing fractions of pixels with HLMRI within the indicated intervals for four patient tumors with different distribution of hypoxia levels. C,P-value from Cox regression analysis of hypoxic fraction calculated for increasing HLMRI threshold (increasing severity level) versus progression-free survival, plotted as a function of HLMRI. Horizontal stippled line indicates a significance level of 0.05. Vertical stippled line indicates HLMRI for the strongest correlation (HLMRI = 0.01). D, Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival of 74 patients with low (solid line) and high (stippled line) hypoxic fraction based on the HLMRI threshold of 0.01 indicated in C. Patients were divided with 1/3 in the high-risk and 2/3 in the low-risk group based on an expected failure rate of 30%. P-value from log-rank test is shown.

Figure 5.

MRI-defined hypoxia levels in patient tumors in relation to treatment outcome. A, Approximate HLMRI intervals for severe, moderate, and mild hypoxia based on the relationship between HLMRI and hypoxia gene activation level in cell lines presented in Fig. 4F. The colored column represents the linear curve in Fig. 4F. Stippled lines indicate median hypoxia level (HLMRI = −0.08) for all patient tumors combined and the hypoxia level with the strongest correlation to progression-free survival (HLMRI = 0.01) in the analysis presented in C. B, Pie charts showing fractions of pixels with HLMRI within the indicated intervals for four patient tumors with different distribution of hypoxia levels. C,P-value from Cox regression analysis of hypoxic fraction calculated for increasing HLMRI threshold (increasing severity level) versus progression-free survival, plotted as a function of HLMRI. Horizontal stippled line indicates a significance level of 0.05. Vertical stippled line indicates HLMRI for the strongest correlation (HLMRI = 0.01). D, Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival of 74 patients with low (solid line) and high (stippled line) hypoxic fraction based on the HLMRI threshold of 0.01 indicated in C. Patients were divided with 1/3 in the high-risk and 2/3 in the low-risk group based on an expected failure rate of 30%. P-value from log-rank test is shown.

Close modal

To address whether differences in the pie charts were associated with differences in chemoradiotherapy outcome, the dataset of 200 hypoxic fractions for HLMRI thresholds in the range of −0.3–0.1 used in Fig. 4E and F were included in survival analysis. The strongest association to outcome was found for hypoxic fractions below a HLMRI threshold of 0.01 (Fig. 5C), which was related to a cell line–derived level of 0.7% O2 and in moderate hypoxia, close to the interval of severe hypoxia (Fig. 5A). Hence, patients with a high hypoxic fraction below this level had a poor outcome compared with the others (P = 0.0014; Fig. 5D). In contrast, weaker or no association to outcome was found for more severe hypoxia; that is, the highest HLMRI values, or for milder hypoxia.

MR images distinguish hypoxia levels of biological significance

The dataset of 200 hypoxic fractions used above was further correlated with gene expression profiles of the patient tumors to identify possible associations between hypoxia level and biological processes. Totally 1,344 genes with the strongest positive correlation for one or more HLMRI thresholds were subjected to GSEA, yielding 36 significantly enriched hallmarks (Supplementary Table S2) that included 350 of the genes. By assigning the HLMRI threshold showing the strongest correlation between hypoxic fraction and expression for the 350 genes, a distribution of hypoxia levels was produced for each of the 36 enriched hallmarks. In general, the individual HLMRI distributions covered a large range of hypoxia levels, and most hallmarks (n = 26) had a median HLMRI in the moderate hypoxia range, including well-known hypoxia-related processes like hypoxia and glycolysis (Supplementary Fig. S8 and S9).

The HLMRI distributions were further compared across the 36 hallmarks, to search for differences in the distributions across biological processes. All hallmarks were tested against each other, and those with a difference (P < 0.05) to less than 25% of the others were removed to simplify analysis. For the remaining 15 hallmarks, three groups with a significant difference in HLMRI distribution were identified (Fig. 6A; Supplementary Fig. S8). A group with the IFNα and IFNγ response hallmarks was associated with mild hypoxia (Fig. 6A and B). A group including G2–M checkpoint, MYC targets, oxidative phosphorylation and MTORC1 signaling was related to significantly more moderate levels, whereas hallmarks like TNFA signaling via NFκB, DNA repair, inflammatory response, angiogenesis, and EMT were associated with the most severe levels.

Figure 6.

Difference in MRI-defined hypoxia levels between cancer hallmarks in patient tumors. A, Median HLMRI indicated for three groups of hallmarks (red, orange, green) with significant different HLMRI distribution (left), each related to either mild (green), moderate (orange), or severe (red) hypoxia. P-values from Wilcoxon rank-sum test are listed in the matrix (right) and show nonsignificant differences in the distributions within the groups (white) and significant differences between the groups (red). B, Cumulative HLMRI distribution associated with a selection of the hallmarks listed in A. Fraction of correlated genes in the hallmark is summarized for HLMRI intervals of 0.0004. Significant different HLMRI distributions are shown in each panel.

Figure 6.

Difference in MRI-defined hypoxia levels between cancer hallmarks in patient tumors. A, Median HLMRI indicated for three groups of hallmarks (red, orange, green) with significant different HLMRI distribution (left), each related to either mild (green), moderate (orange), or severe (red) hypoxia. P-values from Wilcoxon rank-sum test are listed in the matrix (right) and show nonsignificant differences in the distributions within the groups (white) and significant differences between the groups (red). B, Cumulative HLMRI distribution associated with a selection of the hallmarks listed in A. Fraction of correlated genes in the hallmark is summarized for HLMRI intervals of 0.0004. Significant different HLMRI distributions are shown in each panel.

Close modal

The dataset of 200 hypoxic fractions was also included in a correlation analysis against HIF1A protein expression assessed by IHC (Fig. 7A). A strong correlation between HIF1A expression and hypoxic fraction was found for a HLMRI threshold of −0.21 (P = 0.0021; Fig. 7B) within the interval for mild hypoxia. This HLMRI value was related to the cell line–derived hypoxia activation level of 2.2% O2 (Fig. 5A), which is comparable with findings for HIF1A stabilization in experimental studies (8, 9). Moreover, this HLMRI of −0.21 was outside the range for which a significant association to treatment outcome was found (Fig. 5C), consistent with results from survival analysis based on HIF1A protein (Fig. 7C). Taken together, by our imaging method, it appeared possible to distinguish hypoxia levels with association to different biological processes like cancer hallmarks and HIF1A stabilization.

Figure 7.

MRI-defined hypoxia levels in patient tumors in relation to HIF1A protein expression. A, Staining of HIF1A protein in a tumor with high (right) and low (left) protein level. B,P-value in correlation analysis of HIF1A protein level versus hypoxic fraction calculated for increasing HLMRI threshold (increasing severity level) in 73 patients, plotted as a function of HLMRI. Stippled line indicates HLMRI for the strongest correlation (HLMRI = −0.21). C, Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival of 73 patients with low (solid line) and high (stippled line) expression of HIFA protein. Patients were divided in two groups based on the pathology score, 0–3 and 4–5, to obtain approximately 1/3 in the high-risk and 2/3 in the low-risk group. P-value from log-rank test is shown.

Figure 7.

MRI-defined hypoxia levels in patient tumors in relation to HIF1A protein expression. A, Staining of HIF1A protein in a tumor with high (right) and low (left) protein level. B,P-value in correlation analysis of HIF1A protein level versus hypoxic fraction calculated for increasing HLMRI threshold (increasing severity level) in 73 patients, plotted as a function of HLMRI. Stippled line indicates HLMRI for the strongest correlation (HLMRI = −0.21). C, Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival of 73 patients with low (solid line) and high (stippled line) expression of HIFA protein. Patients were divided in two groups based on the pathology score, 0–3 and 4–5, to obtain approximately 1/3 in the high-risk and 2/3 in the low-risk group. P-value from log-rank test is shown.

Close modal

We present a method based on diagnostic MRI to visualize hypoxia levels in patient tumors. Previous imaging studies, including our development of the CSH-tool, have focused solely on the presence of hypoxia without considering its severity (15, 16). By utilizing the CSH-tool together with a dimensional reduction algorithm to assign weighted information of oxygen consumption and supply to each individual pixel, totally new information reflecting the continuous range of hypoxia levels in tumors, was obtained. Although adding more factors like cellular proliferation rate or blood oxyhemoglobin saturation into our algorithm may improve the technology, comparison of our results with indirect measures of hypoxia levels by pimonidazole staining and gene expression showed strong correlations and validated the method. The MRI-defined hypoxia levels differed in their association to treatment outcome and cancer hallmarks in cervical cancer, demonstrating that new understanding of how various levels affect tumor aggressiveness and biology can be achieved. Our approach is easily applicable in the hospital's diagnostic procedures, and a step toward a better exploitation of MR images in the clinic.

Our algorithm was validated in xenograft tumors by matched comparison with pimonidazole-based images as independent surrogate measures of hypoxia levels. Pimonidazole has been considered as a classical IHC marker for hypoxia and used for validation in numerous imaging studies (1). We observed a steady decrease in staining intensity away from necrosis, consistent with work by others (26, 27). In the same manne, binding of pimonidazole or other nitroimidazole compounds in cells or pieces of tissue cultured in vitro has been shown to decrease with increasing oxygen concentrations (24, 28, 29). It is therefore likely that the intensity gradients in our histologic sections reflected true differences in hypoxia levels. By using large-scale similarity analysis of hypoxic fractions obtained from MRI and pimonidazole staining, followed by correlation analysis of the corresponding levels, the linear range for reliable detection of hypoxia levels in xenograft tumors was obtained. The algorithm was further confirmed in patient tumors by using an indicator of hypoxia levels based on gene expression. Strict criteria for gene selection, using expression responses in two cell lines exposed to a range of oxygen concentrations and correlation analysis of expression and imaging data in patient tumors, revealed nine suitable indicator genes. Indeed, a strong linear relationship between the cell line–derived hypoxia activation levels and HLMRI was found, confirming that a continuous range of hypoxia levels could be visualized in patient tumors.

Caution should be taken to directly transfer the oxygen concentrations for activation of genes in cell lines to hypoxia levels in patient tumors. However, it would enable a rough comparison of our results with existing pO2 data of cervical cancer. The median MRI-defined hypoxia level for all tumors combined corresponded to a cell line–derived level of 1.3% O2, which is within the range of 3–17 mmHg (∼0.4%–2.2%) achieved by oxygen electrodes (14). Moreover, the strongest correlation to treatment outcome was found for a level corresponding to 0.7% O2, based on cell line data. This is highly consistent with most pO2 studies, reporting association to outcome for hypoxic fraction below 5 mmHg (approximately 0.7% O2; ref. 14). Although surrogate measures of hypoxia levels were achieved by our approach, the levels seemed to be in accordance with oxygen electrode measurements, and to distinguish levels shown to be of prognostic significance in previous work.

Hypoxia levels associated with biological processes like cancer hallmarks and stabilization of HIF1A protein were identified by our method. At moderate hypoxia, that is, the level most strongly correlated with treatment outcome, oxidative phosphorylation, targets of the MYC oncogene, and G2–M checkpoint, appeared significant, consistent with previous work where we identified a treatment resistant cervix tumor phenotype associated with the same hallmarks (30). This tumor phenotype also appeared to have increased mitochondrial and proliferative activity (30). The stronger correlation of moderate hypoxia levels with poor outcome in our present work might therefore be explained because hypoxic cells still have enough oxygen to proliferate under these conditions, in accordance with a hypothesis proposed by others (10, 31). HIF1A protein expression, on the other hand, appeared significant at mild hypoxia levels, in line with previous reports (6), and showed no correlation to outcome.

At severe hypoxia, the DNA repair hallmark appeared significant, consistent with studies showing activation of DNA damage response at extremely low oxygen concentrations (32). Our finding that inflammatory response and EMT were associated with such severe levels, is less well documented. It is tempting to speculate that this could be a consequence of lactate accumulation due to near complete vascular shut down in regions with severe hypoxia. Lactate is a key molecule in the inflammatory immune suppressive response in tumors (33, 34), and such inflammatory environment is a strong inducer of EMT (35). Although these novel associations for the most severe levels need to be explored further, the findings demonstrate a potential of our method to achieve better insight into the hypoxic tumor phenotype.

Our method to visualize hypoxia levels proposes a new application of routinously acquired DCE-MR images that may have implications for the diagnostic evaluation of patients. The finding that the CSH-tool could be used for this purpose, broadens the utility of the tool. DCE-MRI is widely used for diagnosis of cervical cancer, however, investigation of our approach using other modalities including DW-MRI would be of high interest. Moreover, our work encourages exploration of hypoxia levels in other cancer types as well, by exploiting the MR technology already available at most hospitals. The method thus provides a well-needed opportunity to investigate the importance of individual hypoxia levels in tumor progression.

H. Lyng reports grants from The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (grant no. 2015020) and grants from The Norwegian Cancer Society (grant nos. 107438 and 182451) during the conduct of the study. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

T. Hillestad: Conceptualization, data curation, software, formal analysis, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. T. Hompland: Conceptualization, data curation, software, formal analysis, supervision, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. C.S. Fjeldbo: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. V.E. Skingen: Data curation, software, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. U.B. Salberg: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. E.-K. Aarnes: Data curation, writing-review and editing. A. Nilsen: Data curation, writing-review and editing. K.V. Lund: Data curation, writing-review and editing. T.S. Evensen: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing-review and editing. G.B. Kristensen: Resources, data curation, writing-review and editing. T. Stokke: Resources, writing-review and editing. H. Lyng: Conceptualization, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, writing-original draft, project administration, writing-review and editing.

Financial support was received from The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (grant number 2015020) and The Norwegian Cancer Society (grant numbers 107438 and 182451).Technical assistance from D. Trinh, Department of Pathology at Oslo University Hospital, is highly appreciated.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Horsman
MR
,
Vaupel
P
. 
Pathophysiological basis for the formation of the tumor microenvironment
.
Front Oncol
2016
;
6
:
66
.
2.
McKeown
SR
. 
Defining normoxia, physoxia and hypoxia in tumours—implications for treatment response
.
Br J Radiol
2014
;
87
:
20130676
.
3.
Hunter
FW
,
Wouters
BG
,
Wilson
WR
. 
Hypoxia-activated prodrugs: paths forward in the era of personalised medicine
.
Br J Cancer
2016
;
114
:
1071
7
.
4.
Ye
Y
,
Hu
Q
,
Chen
H
,
Liang
K
,
Yuan
Y
,
Xiang
Y
, et al
Characterization of hypoxia-associated molecular features to aid hypoxia-targeted therapy
.
Nat Metab
2019
;
1
:
431
44
.
5.
Hockel
M
,
Vaupel
P
. 
Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, ciologic, and molecular aspects
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2001
;
93
:
266
76
.
6.
Koumenis
C
,
Wouters
BG
. 
“Translating” tumor hypoxia: unfolded protein response (UPR)-dependent and UPR-independent pathways
.
Mol Cancer Res
2006
;
4
:
423
36
.
7.
Rademakers
SE
,
Span
PN
,
Kaanders
JHAM
,
Sweep
FCGJ
,
van der Kogel
AJ
,
Bussink
J
. 
Molecular aspects of tumour hypoxia
.
Mol Oncol
2008
;
2
:
41
53
.
8.
Jiang
BH
,
Semenza
GL
,
Bauer
C
,
Marti
HH
. 
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 levels vary exponentially over a physiologically relevant range of O2 tension
.
Am J Physiol
1996
;
271
:
C1172
80
.
9.
Bracken
CP
,
Fedele
AO
,
Linke
S
,
Balrak
W
,
Lisy
K
,
Whitelaw
ML
, et al
Cell-specific regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α stabilization and transactivation in a graded oxygen environment
.
J Biol Chem
2006
;
281
:
22575
85
.
10.
Hoogsteen
IJ
,
Marres
HAM
,
Wijffels
KIEM
,
Rijken
PFJW
,
Peters
JPW
,
van den Hoogen
FJA
, et al
Colocalization of carbonic anhydrase 9 expression and cell proliferation in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
97
106
.
11.
Luoto
KR
,
Kumareswaran
R
,
Bristow
RG
. 
Tumor hypoxia as a driving force in genetic instability
.
Genome Integr
2013
;
4
:
5
.
12.
Triner
D
,
Shah
YM
. 
Hypoxia-inducible factors: a central link between inflammation and cancer
.
J Clin Invest
2016
;
126
:
3689
98
.
13.
Gort
EH
,
Groot
AJ
,
van der Wall
E
,
van Diest
PJ
,
Vooijs
MA
. 
Hypoxic regulation of metastasis via hypoxia-inducible factors
.
Curr Mol Med
2008
;
8
:
60
7
.
14.
Vaupel
P
,
Höckel
M
,
Mayer
A
. 
Detection and characterization of tumor hypoxia using pO2 histography
.
Antioxid Redox Signal
2007
;
9
:
1221
35
.
15.
Horsman
MR
,
Mortensen
LS
,
Petersen
JB
,
Busk
M
,
Overgaard
J
. 
Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome
.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol
2012
;
9
:
674
87
.
16.
Hompland
T
,
Hole
KH
,
Ragnum
HB
,
Aarnes
E-K
,
Vlatkovic
L
,
Lie
AK
, et al
Combined MR imaging of oxygen consumption and supply reveals tumor hypoxia and aggressiveness in prostate cancer patients
.
Cancer Res
2018
;
78
:
4774
85
.
17.
Vaupel
P
,
Mayer
A
. 
Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2007
;
26
:
225
39
.
18.
Lyng
H
,
Malinen
E
. 
Hypoxia in cervical cancer: from biology to imaging
.
Clin Transl Imaging
2017
;
5
:
373
88
.
19.
Tofts
PS
,
Brix
G
,
Buckley
DL
,
Evelhoch
JL
,
Henderson
E
,
Knopp
MV
, et al
Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols
.
J Magn Reson Imaging
1999
;
10
:
223
32
.
20.
Fjeldbo
CS
,
Julin
CH
,
Lando
M
,
Forsberg
MF
,
Aarnes
E-K
,
Alsner
J
, et al
Integrative analysis of DCE-MRI and gene expression profiles in construction of a gene classifier for assessment of hypoxia-related risk of chemoradiotherapy failure in cervical cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2016
;
22
:
4067
76
.
21.
Halle
C
,
Andersen
E
,
Lando
M
,
Aarnes
E-K
,
Hasvold
G
,
Holden
M
, et al
Hypoxia-induced gene expression in chemoradioresistant cervical cancer revealed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
.
Cancer Res
2012
;
72
:
5285
95
.
22.
Danaher
P
,
Warren
S
,
Dennis
L
,
D'Amico
L
,
White
A
,
Disis
ML
, et al
Gene expression markers of tumor infiltrating leukocytes
.
J Immunother Cancer
2017
;
5
:
18
.
23.
Zahra
MA
,
Hollingsworth
KG
,
Sala
E
,
Lomas
DJ
,
Tan
LT
. 
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy
.
Lancet Oncol
2007
;
8
:
63
74
.
24.
Arteel
G
,
Thurman
R
,
Yates
J
,
Raleigh
J
. 
Evidence that hypoxia markers detect oxygen gradients in liver: pimonidazole and retrograde perfusion of rat liver
.
Br J Cancer
1995
;
72
:
889
95
.
25.
Sørensen
BS
,
Hao
J
,
Overgaard
J
,
Vorum
H
,
Honoré
B
,
Alsner
J
, et al
Influence of oxygen concentration and pH on expression of hypoxia induced genes
.
Radiother Oncol
2005
;
76
:
187
93
.
26.
Zaidi
M
,
Fu
F
,
Cojocari
D
,
McKee
TD
,
Wouters
BG
. 
Quantitative visualization of hypoxia and proliferation gradients within histological tissue sections
.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol
2019
;
7
:
397
.
27.
Sundstrom
A
,
Grabocka
E
,
Bar-Sagi
D
,
Mishra
B
. 
Histological image processing features induce a quantitative characterization of chronic tumor hypoxia
.
PLoS One
2016
;
11
:
e0153623
.
28.
Urtasun
RC
,
Chapman
JD
,
Raleigh
JA
,
Franko
AJ
,
Koch
CJ
. 
Binding of 3H-misonidazole to solid human tumors as a measure of tumor hypoxia
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1986
;
12
:
1263
7
.
29.
Koch
CJ
,
Evans
SM
,
Lord
EM
. 
Oxygen dependence of cellular uptake of EF5 [2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl)a cet amide]: analysis of drug adducts by fluorescent antibodies vs. bound radioactivity
.
Br J Cancer
1995
;
72
:
869
74
.
30.
Jonsson
M
,
Fjeldbo
CS
,
Holm
R
,
Stokke
T
,
Kristensen
GB
,
Lyng
H
. 
Mitochondrial function of CKS2 oncoprotein links oxidative phosphorylation with cell division in chemoradioresistant cervical cancer
.
Neoplasia
2019
;
21
:
353
62
.
31.
Wouters
BG
,
Brown
JM
. 
Cells at intermediate oxygen levels can be more important than the “hypoxic fraction” in determining tumor response to fractionated radiotherapy
.
Radiat Res
1997
;
147
:
541
50
.
32.
Ng
N
,
Purshouse
K
,
Foskolou
IP
,
Olcina
MM
,
Hammond
EM
. 
Challenges to DNA replication in hypoxic conditions
.
FEBS J
2018
;
285
:
1563
71
.
33.
Hirschhaeuser
F
,
Sattler
UGA
,
Mueller-Klieser
W
. 
Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer
.
Cancer Res
2011
;
71
:
6921
5
.
34.
Pucino
V
,
Bombardieri
M
,
Pitzalis
C
,
Mauro
C
. 
Lactate at the crossroads of metabolism, inflammation, and autoimmunity
.
Eur J Immunol
2017
;
47
:
14
21
.
35.
Suarez-Carmona
M
,
Lesage
J
,
Cataldo
D
,
Gilles
C
. 
EMT and inflammation: inseparable actors of cancer progression
.
Mol Oncol
2017
;
11
:
805
23
.