We read with great interest the publication by Kang and colleagues (1). The authors describe that agonistic anti-CD137 (TNFRSF9, 4-1BB) antibodies enhance antitumor T-cell responses in murine xenograft models that is consistent with the findings of many other groups and that corresponds to the consensus in the field. In the same publication, the authors report that in CD137-deficient mice, growth of CT26 colon carcinoma and Renca renal carcinoma was significantly inhibited.

This is puzzling and in contrast to a multitude of findings that show the importance of CD137–CD137 ligand (CD137L) interactions for transplant rejection, pathogen clearance, and protection against malignant disease. In addition, the current report is also in contrast with an earlier one by some of the same authors who found an increased growth of B16F10 melanoma in CD137-deficient mice (2). The research community would benefit if the authors could provide an explanation for the contrasting growth patterns of different tumors in CD137-deficient mice.

Furthermore, the authors propose that “blockade of the CD137L signaling pathway may be used to promote therapy-induced immunosurveillance.” While CD137 forward signaling, that is, costimulation of T cells, is conserved between human and mouse, there is evidence that reverse CD137L signaling into monocytic cells differs between the two species. Reverse CD137L signaling in murine monocytes induces cell activation and IL10 secretion but does not lead to a proinflammatory phenotype (3). However, in human monocytes and dendritic cells (DC), reverse CD137L signaling causes a proinflammatory cell activation. In monocytes, it induces the release of proinflammatory cytokines, prolonged survival, endomitosis, and migration. Furthermore, reverse CD137L signaling induces maturation of human immature DCs and even differentiation of peripheral human monocytes to inflammatory DCs that resemble inflammatory DCs isolated from a tumor ascites or the synovial fluid of a rheumatoid arthritis patient and that have an enhanced capability to induce antiviral T-cell responses (4).

This species difference may have its cause in the unusually low homology of 36% between human and murine CD137L, whereas for most other members of the TNF and TNF receptor families, the human–mouse homology is 60%–80% (5). We are therefore sceptical that data on reverse CD137L signaling obtained from murine cells or mice are translatable to the human system and would strongly caution against using CD137L blockade for human cancer immunotherapy.

See the Response, p. 1572

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

1.
Kang
SW
,
Lee
SC
,
Park
SH
,
Kim
J
,
Kim
HH
,
Lee
HW
, et al
Anti-CD137 suppresses tumor growth by blocking reverse signaling by CD137 ligand
.
Cancer Res
2017
;
77
:
5989
6000
.
2.
Ju
SA
,
Lee
SC
,
Kwon
TH
,
Heo
SK
,
Park
SM
,
Paek
HN
, et al
Immunity to melanoma mediated by 4-1BB is associated with enhanced activity of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
.
Immunol Cell Biol
2005
;
83
:
344
51
.
3.
Tang
Q
,
Jiang
D
,
Shao
Z
,
Martinez Gomez
JM
,
Schwarz
H
. 
Species difference of CD137 ligand signaling in human and murine monocytes
.
PLoSOne
2011
;
6
:
e16129
.
4.
Dharmadhikari
B
,
Wu
M
,
Abdullah
NS
,
Rajendran
S
,
Ishak
ND
,
Nickles
E
, et al
CD137 and CD137L signals are main drivers of type 1, cell-mediated immune responses
.
OncoImmunol
2016
;
5
:
e1113367
.
5.
Alderson
MR
,
Smith
CA
,
Tough
TW
,
Davis-Smith
T
,
Armitage
RJ
,
Falk
B
, et al
Molecular and biological characterization of human 4-1BB and its ligand
.
Eur J Immunol
1994
;
24
:
2219
27
.