Prognosis prediction in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) mainly relies on patient-related factors (e.g., age) and the detection of genomic lesions (1). De Grandis and colleagues have published that junction adhesion molecule C (JAM-C) is expressed on leukemia-initiating cells (LIC), acts through SFK pathway activation, and independently predicts adverse outcome in a cohort of patients with CD34+ AML (2). The prognostic value was analyzed in the context of LIC because JAM-C has been described to regulate homing of stem cells to the hematopoietic niche (3).

We measured JAM-C by flow cytometry on bulk leukemic cells (SSCloCD45dim) of bone marrow samples biobanked from a subset of patients treated within the randomized AML96 trial (NCT00180115; Table 1A; ref. 4). JAM-C expression showed a moderate, but statistically significant inverse correlation with CD34 expression (Table 1B) and was associated with the absence of double-mutated CEBPA (Table 1C). After having determined a 10% cutoff for JAM-C by cross-validation, CD34 and JAM-C could be shown to be both associated with a reduced probability to achieve a complete remission after induction therapy (CR1; Fig. 1A). Neither CD34 nor JAM-C were predictors of relapse-free survival (RFS; Table 2A). Using the same cutoff, JAM-C+ patients showed a significantly shortened median overall survival (OS; JAM-C+ 10.1 months vs. JAM-C 26.7 months, log-rank P = 0.0062), whereas CD34 only conveyed a trend toward an impaired survival (Fig. 1B and C). Even in multivariate analysis, the prognostic value of JAM-C positivity remained statistically significant (Table 2B). When patients with biallelic-mutated CEBPA (n = 18) and with unknown CEBPA mutation status (n = 4) were excluded, JAM-C expression maintained its significant influence on OS and CR1 (data not shown).

Table 1A.

Characteristics of patients

Characteristicsn = 198
Age   
 <60 [%] 47 
 ≥60 [%] 53 
 Median [y] 60.5 
 Range [y] 19–81 
Sex—Female [%] 44 
Molecular genetics   
FLT3-ITD [%] 28 
NPM1-mutation [%] 38 
 Biallelic CEBPA-mutation [%] 
Karyotype   
 Normal [%] 68 
 Aberrant [%] 32 
 Not available [%] 
Cytogenetics AML96   
 Fav [%] 
 Int [%] 84 
 Adv [%] 15 
ELN2010   
 Fav [%] 37 
 Int 1 [%] 35 
 Int 2 [%] 14 
 Adv [%] 13 
FAB   
 M0 [%] 
 M1 [%] 21 
 M2 [%] 37 
 M4 [%] 14 
 M4eo [%] 
 M5a [%] 15 
 M5b [%] 
 M6 [%] 
 Other (RAEB2, RAEBT) [%] 
Status   
De novo AML [%] 86 
 sAML [%] 
 tAML [%] 11 
Characteristicsn = 198
Age   
 <60 [%] 47 
 ≥60 [%] 53 
 Median [y] 60.5 
 Range [y] 19–81 
Sex—Female [%] 44 
Molecular genetics   
FLT3-ITD [%] 28 
NPM1-mutation [%] 38 
 Biallelic CEBPA-mutation [%] 
Karyotype   
 Normal [%] 68 
 Aberrant [%] 32 
 Not available [%] 
Cytogenetics AML96   
 Fav [%] 
 Int [%] 84 
 Adv [%] 15 
ELN2010   
 Fav [%] 37 
 Int 1 [%] 35 
 Int 2 [%] 14 
 Adv [%] 13 
FAB   
 M0 [%] 
 M1 [%] 21 
 M2 [%] 37 
 M4 [%] 14 
 M4eo [%] 
 M5a [%] 15 
 M5b [%] 
 M6 [%] 
 Other (RAEB2, RAEBT) [%] 
Status   
De novo AML [%] 86 
 sAML [%] 
 tAML [%] 11 

NOTE: Patients (n = 198) with newly diagnosed non-APL-AML from the randomized AML96 trial were included. Patient characteristics and clinical disease characteristics are shown.

Abbreviations: FLT3-ITD, internal tandem duplication of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3; NPM1, nucleophosmin; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; fav, favorable; int, intermediate; adv, adverse; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess of blasts; RAEBT, RAEB in transformation; sAML, secondary AML; tAML, therapy-related AML.

Table 1B.

Characteristics of patient

Characteristics of patient
Characteristics of patient
Table 1C.

Characteristics of patient

CD34+CD117+HLA-DR+JAM-C+
Disease characteristics[% of Blasts]
Age [years] 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
Gender [m/f] 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
AML type [De novo/tAML/sAML] 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
Karyotype [Aberrant/normal] 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
ELN2010 [fav/int-1/int-2/adv] 0.005 1.000 1.000 0.224 
NPM1 [WT/mut] 0.000 0.308 1.000 0.441 
FLT3 [WT/ITD] 0.484 1.000 0.163 1.000 
CEBPA [WT/double-mut] 0.012 0.813 1.000 0.001 
WBC [Gpt/L] 0.021 0.007 1.000 0.043 
BlastsBM [%] 0.034 1.000 1.000 1.000 
BlastsPB [%] 1.000 0.004 0.006 0.041 
CD34+CD117+HLA-DR+JAM-C+
Disease characteristics[% of Blasts]
Age [years] 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
Gender [m/f] 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
AML type [De novo/tAML/sAML] 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
Karyotype [Aberrant/normal] 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 
ELN2010 [fav/int-1/int-2/adv] 0.005 1.000 1.000 0.224 
NPM1 [WT/mut] 0.000 0.308 1.000 0.441 
FLT3 [WT/ITD] 0.484 1.000 0.163 1.000 
CEBPA [WT/double-mut] 0.012 0.813 1.000 0.001 
WBC [Gpt/L] 0.021 0.007 1.000 0.043 
BlastsBM [%] 0.034 1.000 1.000 1.000 
BlastsPB [%] 1.000 0.004 0.006 0.041 

NOTE: Association of MCF parameters with disease characteristics (Padj values, Bonferroni–Holm method). Bold data denote statistically significant results.

Abbreviations: BlastsBM/PB, cytomorphologically identified blasts in the bone marrow and peripheral blood; ELN2010, European Leukemia Network criteria 2010; f, female, m, male; WBC, white blood cell count.

Figure 1.

Association of immunophenotype and disease outcome. A, Univariate association between cell surface antigens and probability to achieve a complete remission after induction therapy (JAM-C, 79.7%; JAM-C+, 58.0%; JAM-C OR, 2.853; 95% CI, 1.502–5.641, P = 0.002; CD34 OR, 1.939; 95% CI, 1.040–3.715, P = 0.041). Only JAM-C remained statistically significant when adjusted with the following variables: age, s/tAML, ELN2010, FLT3-ITD, NPM1mut, FLT3-ITD/NPM1mut (HR, 2.482; 95% CI, 1.015–6.067; P = 0.046). B, Kaplan–Meier estimate of OS for patients with AML according to their CD34 status (10% cutoff; median OS CD34, 18.4 months; CD34+, 13.2 months; HR, 0.7462; 95% CI, 0.5361–1.039; log-rank test, P = 0.0827). C, Kaplan–Meier estimate of OS for patients with AML according to their JAM–C status (10% cutoff; median OS JAM–C, 26.7 months; JAM–C+, 10.1 months; HR, 1.578; 95% CI, 1.138–2.188; log-rank test, P = 0.0062).

Figure 1.

Association of immunophenotype and disease outcome. A, Univariate association between cell surface antigens and probability to achieve a complete remission after induction therapy (JAM-C, 79.7%; JAM-C+, 58.0%; JAM-C OR, 2.853; 95% CI, 1.502–5.641, P = 0.002; CD34 OR, 1.939; 95% CI, 1.040–3.715, P = 0.041). Only JAM-C remained statistically significant when adjusted with the following variables: age, s/tAML, ELN2010, FLT3-ITD, NPM1mut, FLT3-ITD/NPM1mut (HR, 2.482; 95% CI, 1.015–6.067; P = 0.046). B, Kaplan–Meier estimate of OS for patients with AML according to their CD34 status (10% cutoff; median OS CD34, 18.4 months; CD34+, 13.2 months; HR, 0.7462; 95% CI, 0.5361–1.039; log-rank test, P = 0.0827). C, Kaplan–Meier estimate of OS for patients with AML according to their JAM–C status (10% cutoff; median OS JAM–C, 26.7 months; JAM–C+, 10.1 months; HR, 1.578; 95% CI, 1.138–2.188; log-rank test, P = 0.0062).

Close modal
Table 2A.

Association of immunophenotype and disease outcome

Median RFS (months)
NegativePositiveLog-rank test [P]
CD34 23.15 11.93 0.4899 
CD117 50.5 14.73 0.7548 
HLA-DR 39.48 14.1 0.6417 
JAM-C 18.7 14.07 0.3052 
Median RFS (months)
NegativePositiveLog-rank test [P]
CD34 23.15 11.93 0.4899 
CD117 50.5 14.73 0.7548 
HLA-DR 39.48 14.1 0.6417 
JAM-C 18.7 14.07 0.3052 

NOTE: Cox regression analysis of immunophenotype (cutoff 10%) and median relapse-free survival.

Table 2B.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis for OS

VariablesHR (95% CI)P
Age 1.046 (1.031–1.063) 0.0000 
s/tAML 0.884 (0.55–1.422) 0.613 
ELN2010 fav 0.73 (0.409–1.303) 0.289 
ELN2010 int-2 0.999 (0.583–1.711) 0.997 
ELN2010 adv 2.304 (1.359–3.907) 0.0020 
FLT3-ITD 0.961 (0.59–1.566) 0.872 
NPM1mut 0.477 (0.27–0.844) 0.0011 
FLT3-ITD/NPM1mut 1.834 (0.77–4.37) 0.171 
CEBPAdouble-mut 0.879 (0.395–1.96) 0.754 
JAM-Cnegative 0.642 (0.434–0.948) 0.0026 
VariablesHR (95% CI)P
Age 1.046 (1.031–1.063) 0.0000 
s/tAML 0.884 (0.55–1.422) 0.613 
ELN2010 fav 0.73 (0.409–1.303) 0.289 
ELN2010 int-2 0.999 (0.583–1.711) 0.997 
ELN2010 adv 2.304 (1.359–3.907) 0.0020 
FLT3-ITD 0.961 (0.59–1.566) 0.872 
NPM1mut 0.477 (0.27–0.844) 0.0011 
FLT3-ITD/NPM1mut 1.834 (0.77–4.37) 0.171 
CEBPAdouble-mut 0.879 (0.395–1.96) 0.754 
JAM-Cnegative 0.642 (0.434–0.948) 0.0026 

NOTE: Bold data denote statistically significant results.

In contrast to de Grandis and colleagues, JAM-C positivity did not negatively impact RFS. Still, in our cohort, JAM-C positivity remained an independent predictor of worsened OS, which might be attributable to the reduced likelihood to achieve a CR1. Complementary to the observation published by de Grandis and colleagues, our data suggest that the association between JAM-C expression and reduced OS might not necessarily be linked to an association with the stem cell compartment and its accompanying niches, as we have detected JAM-C on the bulk of leukemic cells. However, we cannot exclude that the enhanced JAM-C expression on the bulk of leukemic cells was associated in parallel with an increase in LICs as defined by de Grandis and colleagues (SSCloCD45dimCD33+CD34+CD38dimCD123+JAM-C+), although we have even observed an inversed association between the expression of CD34 and JAM-C.

Finally, our data further support the significance of JAM-C as a prognostic marker in patients with AML, even for CD34 cases and measured within routine flow cytometric AML diagnostics. Because of its expression on bulk leukemic cells, targeting JAM-C by immunotherapy as proposed by de Grandis and colleagues could not only help to mitigate LICs (with a crucial importance for the long-term prognosis) but could be also used to reduce tumor burden in the short run.

See the Response, p. 6342

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

We gratefully thank Triantafyllos Chavakis for helpful discussions.

1.
Döhner
H
,
Estey
EH
,
Amadori
S
,
Appelbaum
FR
,
Büchner
T
,
Burnett
AK
, et al
Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet
.
Blood
2010
;
115
:
453
74
.
2.
De Grandis
M
,
Bardin
F
,
Fauriat
C
,
Zemmour
C
,
El-Kaoutari
A
,
Sergé
A
, et al
JAM-C identifies Src family kinase-activated leukemia-initiating cells and predicts poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia
.
Cancer Res
2017
;
77
:
6627
40
.
3.
Arcangeli
M-L
,
Bardin
F
,
Frontera
V
,
Bidaut
G
,
Obrados
E
,
Adams
RH
, et al
Function of Jam-B/Jam-C interaction in homing and mobilization of human and mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
.
Stem Cells
2014
;
32
:
1043
54
.
4.
Rollig
C
,
Thiede
C
,
Gramatzki
M
,
Aulitzky
W
,
Bodenstein
H
,
Bornhauser
M
, et al
A novel prognostic model in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of 909 patients entered into the prospective AML96 trial
.
Blood
2010
;
116
:
971
8
.