Pathogenesis and progression of lung cancer are governed by complex interactions between the environment and host genetic susceptibility, which is further modulated by genetic and epigenetic changes. Autotaxin (ATX, ENPP2) is a secreted glycoprotein that catalyzes the extracellular production of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a growth-factor–like phospholipid that is further regulated by phospholipid phosphatases (PLPP). LPA's pleiotropic effects in almost all cell types are mediated through at least six G-protein coupled LPA receptors (LPAR) that exhibit overlapping specificities, widespread distribution, and differential expression profiles. Here we use both preclinical models of lung cancer and clinical samples (from patients and healthy controls) to investigate the expression levels, activity, and biological role of the above components of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer. ENPP2 was genetically altered in 8% of patients with lung cancer, whereas increased ATX staining and activity were detected in patient biopsies and sera, respectively. Moreover, PLPP3 expression was consistently downregulated in patients with lung cancer. Comparable observations were made in the two most widely used animal models of lung cancer, the carcinogen urethane–induced and the genetically engineered K-rasG12D–driven models, where genetic deletion of Enpp2 or Lpar1 resulted in disease attenuation, thus confirming a procarcinogenic role of LPA signaling in the lung. Expression profiling data analysis suggested that metabolic rewiring may be implicated in the procarcinogenic effects of the ATX/LPA axis in K-ras-G12D–driven lung cancer pathogenesis.

Significance: These findings establish the role of ATX/LPA in lung carcinogenesis, thus expanding the mechanistic links between pulmonary fibrosis and cancer. Cancer Res; 78(13); 3634–44. ©2018 AACR.

Lung cancer is the most prevalent form of malignancy and the leading cause of global cancer-related mortality; the prognosis for patients with lung cancer remains dismal, with a 5-year survival rate below 20%, for all disease stages combined. The major (85%) histological subtype of lung cancer is non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is further subdivided to adenocarcinoma (ADC; 40%), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 25%–30%), and large cell carcinoma (LCC; 10%–15%; ref. 1).

The molecular origins of lung cancer lie in complex interactions between the environment and host genetic susceptibility, further modulated by genetic and epigenetic changes, leading to changes in the activation status of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (1). However, lung cancer, and especially NSCLC, is considered as a group of distinct diseases with vast genetic and cellular heterogeneity and although some genomic alterations are shared among various histologic types, most alterations remain distinct (2). The identified genomic alterations are not always associated with the activation of the relevant cellular pathways and the corresponding phenotypic aberrations (3), thus further increasing the complexity of correlating genotypic and phenotypic data.

Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 2 (ENPP2), more commonly known as autotaxin (ATX), is a secreted glycoprotein widely present in biological fluids. ATX catalyzes the extracellular hydrolysis of circulating and/or de novo produced lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA; ref. 4). LPA, whose levels are catabolized by phospholipid phosphatases (PLPP; ref. 5), is a pleiotropic phospholipid mediator that evokes growth factor–like responses such as cell growth, survival, differentiation and motility, in most cell types (6). The large variety of LPA effector functions is attributed to at least six G-protein coupled LPA receptors (LPAR), exhibiting overlapping specificities and widespread distribution (7). The orphan GPR87 and P2Y10 receptors, as well as the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and the intracellular peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), have also been suggested to mediate LPA signaling (4, 7).

ATX was originally isolated as an autocrine motility stimulation factor from the supernatant of metastatic melanoma cells; because increased ATX expression has been detected in several chronic inflammatory and/or malignant diseases (4, 8). ATX expression and LPA production have been shown to be essential for embryonic development (9), but largely dispensable for adult life (10), suggesting ATX/LPA as a developmental pathway aberrantly re-activated in pathophysiological situations. Transgenic overexpression of ATX or LPARs specifically in the mammary gland resulted in spontaneous breast cancer in aged mice (11), suggesting that ATX/LPA may amplify oncogenic age-related signals. Moreover, conditional genetic deletion of ATX from hepatocytes was recently shown to attenuate the development of both liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; ref. 12).

Increased ATX and LPA levels have been identified in the lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), respectively, of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), whereas genetic deletion of Enpp2 or Lpar1 have been shown to attenuate the development of the modeled disease (13, 14). Therefore, given that pulmonary fibrosis is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer (15), we herein aimed to further investigate the potential involvement of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer pathogenesis. ENPP2 was in silico discovered to be genetically altered in some patients with lung cancer, whereas increased ATX staining and activity were detected in patients and animal models, accompanied by a downregulation of PLPP3 expression. Most importantly, genetic deletion of Enpp2 or Lpar1 in mice resulted in disease attenuation, thus confirming a procarcinogenic role of ATX/LPA in the lung.

Human patients

Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics of patients and controls are presented at Supplementary Tables S1 and S2. Clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, after approval by an Institutional Review Board. All patients and controls consented in writing for anonymous research usage of their biological samples.

Mice

All mice were bred under specific pathogen-free conditions in their respective genetic backgrounds for over 10 generations at the animal facilities of the Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center. Mice were housed at 20–22°C, 55% ± 5% humidity, and a 12-h light-dark cycle; water and food were given ad libitum. All reported experimentation in mice for this project, in line with the ARRIVE guidelines, was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of BSRC Alexander Fleming and the Veterinary service and Fishery Department of the local governmental prefecture. All randomly-assigned experimental controls were littermate sex- and age-matched mice.

The generation and genotyping protocols for Enpp2n/n (9), Lpar1/ (16), Lpar2−/ (17), K-rasG12D/+ (18), TgCC10-Cre and TgLysM-Cre (14) have been described previously. All mice, except for Lpar1−/−, were bred in a C57BL/6J genetic background. The oncogenic allele of K-ras (G12D; ref. 18) was activated upon the intratracheal delivery of 2.5 × 107 pfu/mouse of an adenovirus expressing Cre recombinase, as previously reported (19) and as described in detail in an Online Data Supplement. Chemically induced lung cancer was provoked upon weekly intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 1 g/Kg urethane (URE; ethyl carbamate) for ten consecutive weeks, as previously reported (20) and as described in an Online Data Supplement.

Histology, immunohistochemistry, ATX activity assay (TOOS), HPLC-ESI/MS/MS lipid analysis, RNA Extraction and Real-time RT-PCR were performed essentially as previously reported (12, 14, 20, 21) and as detailed in an Online Data Supplement.

Microarray hybridization and expression data analysis are described in an Online Data Supplement. The MIAME-compliant dataset is publicly available (#E-MTAB-6706) at ArrayExpress.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise indicated, statistical significance was estimated through pair-wise comparisons with control values using an unpaired, two-sided Student t test or with a Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test in cases of not normal distribution.

ENPP2 is genetically altered in 8% of patients with lung cancer

To explore a possible role of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer, we first examined the genomic status of ENPP2, as well as of LPARs and PLPPs, in patients with lung cancer. Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC) analysis was performed online in cBioPortal (22) on publicly available whole-exome sequencing data from the recent landmark genomic study of lung cancer (23), as deposited to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). ENPP2 was found genetically altered in 8% of patients with lung cancer (n = 1,144; Supplementary Fig. S1A); almost 50% of the identified alterations were gene amplifications that were accompanied by MYC, as well as other genes in the 8q24 genomic locus, amplification in the same patients (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Alterations in other genes of the ATX/LPA axis were much fewer (Supplementary Fig. S1A).

To assess steady-state mRNA expression of ENPP2, as well as LPARs and PLPPs, in human lung cancer patients' lung tissue, we performed data mining in 41 lung cancer patient microarray datasets publicly available at NCBI/GEO (Supplementary Table S1) with the embedded tool GEO2R. In sharp contrast with a similar in silico query in HCC (12), ENPP2 mRNA expression was found to be statistically significantly downregulated in lung cancer samples, as compared with controls, in most of the patient cohorts' datasets (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S2A). PLPP3 expression in patients with lung cancer was consistently found downregulated, as previously shown with the same methodology in patients with HCC (12). Identical results were obtained from qRT-PCR analysis of 14 patients with NSCLC paired lung samples, where ENPP2 and PLPP3 mRNA expression was found lower in cancer biopsies as compared with adjacent healthy lung tissue isolated from the same patients (Supplementary Fig. S2B), thus suggesting deregulated LPA metabolism in patients with lung cancer.

Increased ATX protein levels in the lungs of patients with lung cancer and animal models

To examine pulmonary ATX protein levels, we performed ATX immunohistochemistry in lung tissue biopsies of 281 patients with lung cancer (Table 1), in comparison with 10 healthy controls, spotted in a tissue microarray (TMA) to ensure identical procedures and facilitate direct comparisons. As previously shown (14), ATX immunostaining in the healthy lung tissue was localized mainly to the bronchial epithelium and to a lesser extent in alveolar macrophages (Fig. 1A). Moderate to intense ATX staining was detected in lung cancer as compared to healthy lung tissue (Fig. 1A–C), found localized in cancer cells and negligible in the surrounding stroma (Fig. 1A). However, no statistically significant associations of the intensity of ATX staining with any demographic or clinicopathological characteristics were observed (Table 1). Moreover, increased serum ATX activity levels, as detected with the TOOS assay on natural LPC substrates, were found in a different patient with lung cancer cohort (n = 68) in comparison with control samples (n = 19; Supplementary Table S2). Therefore, lung cancer in humans is associated with increased levels of ATX protein and activity, corroborating a possible involvement of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer pathogenesis.

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with lung cancer with microarrayed tissue samples

Variablesn (m/f)Low ATX n (m/f)High ATX n (m/f)χ2P
Age    0.506 0.477 
 <64 years 136 (115/21) 58 (48/10) 78 (67/11)   
 ≥64 years 145 (131/14) 69 (60/9) 76 (71/5)   
Gender    0.673 0.412 
 Female 35 19 16   
 Male 246 108 138   
Smoking    0.0923 0.761 
 Yes 226 (208/18) 105 (94/11) 121 (114/7)   
 No 23 (9/14) 12 (4/8) 11 (5/6)   
 n/a 32 (29/3) 10 (10/0) 22 (19/3)   
Histological stage    1.736 0.629 
 I 89 (75/14) 37 (32/5) 52 (43/9)   
 II 76 (69/7) 38 (33/5) 38 (36/2)   
 III 80 (70/10) 37 (29/8) 43 (41/2)   
 IV 31 (27/4) 12 (11/1) 19 (16/3)   
 n/a 5 (5/0) 3 (3/0) 2 (2/0)   
T status    4.226 0.238 
 1 39 (37/2) 12 (11/1) 27 (26/1)   
 2 157 (133/24) 77 (63/14) 80 (70/10)   
 3 33 (29/4) 15 (13/2) 18 (16/2)   
 4 45 (41/4) 20 (18/2) 25 (23/2)   
 n/a 7 (6/1) 3 (3/0) 4 (3/1)   
Lymph node status    4.054 0.256 
 0 116 (99/17) 47 (42/5) 69 (57/12)   
 1 84 (76/8) 44 (37/7) 40 (39/1)   
 2 69 (60/9) 31 (24/7) 38 (36/2)   
 3 5 (4/1) 1 (1/0) 4 (3/1)   
 n/a 7 (7/0) 4 (4/0) 3 (3/0)   
Metastasis status    0.321 0.571 
 0 244 (213/31) 112 (94/18) 132 (119/13)   
 1 31 (27/4) 12 (11/1) 19 (16/3)   
 n/a 6 (6/0) 3 (3/0) 3 (3/0)   
Histological type    11.841 0.106 
 NSCLC 275 (241/34) 122 (104/18) 153 (137/16)   
  ADC 110 (91/19) 39* (30/9) 71* (61/10) 4.011* 0.045* 
  SCC 139 (126/13) 68* (59/9) 71* (67/4)   
  ADSQ. 3 (3/0) 1 (1/0) 2 (2/0)   
  Giant CC 12 (10/2) 7 (7/0) 5 (3/2)   
  Large CC 4 (4/0) 2 (2/0) 2 (2/0)   
  n/a 7 (7/0) 5 (5/0) 2 (2/0)   
 SCLC 4 (4/0) 3 (3/0) 1 (1/0)   
 NET 2 (1/1) 2 (1/1) 0 (0/0)   
Histological grade    3.431 0.634 
 Undifferentiated 11 (9/2) 6 (6/0) 5 (3/2)   
 High grade 10 (6/4) 3 (2/1) 7 (4/3)   
 Middle grade 106 (91/15) 52 (43/9) 54 (48/6)   
 Middle-low grade 12 (10/2) 4 (3/1) 8 (7/1)   
 Low grade 117 (108/9) 48 (43/5) 69 (65/4)   
 Well different. 10 (8/2) 4 (2/2) 6 (6/0)   
 n/a 15 (14/1) 10 (9/1) 5 (5/0)   
Variablesn (m/f)Low ATX n (m/f)High ATX n (m/f)χ2P
Age    0.506 0.477 
 <64 years 136 (115/21) 58 (48/10) 78 (67/11)   
 ≥64 years 145 (131/14) 69 (60/9) 76 (71/5)   
Gender    0.673 0.412 
 Female 35 19 16   
 Male 246 108 138   
Smoking    0.0923 0.761 
 Yes 226 (208/18) 105 (94/11) 121 (114/7)   
 No 23 (9/14) 12 (4/8) 11 (5/6)   
 n/a 32 (29/3) 10 (10/0) 22 (19/3)   
Histological stage    1.736 0.629 
 I 89 (75/14) 37 (32/5) 52 (43/9)   
 II 76 (69/7) 38 (33/5) 38 (36/2)   
 III 80 (70/10) 37 (29/8) 43 (41/2)   
 IV 31 (27/4) 12 (11/1) 19 (16/3)   
 n/a 5 (5/0) 3 (3/0) 2 (2/0)   
T status    4.226 0.238 
 1 39 (37/2) 12 (11/1) 27 (26/1)   
 2 157 (133/24) 77 (63/14) 80 (70/10)   
 3 33 (29/4) 15 (13/2) 18 (16/2)   
 4 45 (41/4) 20 (18/2) 25 (23/2)   
 n/a 7 (6/1) 3 (3/0) 4 (3/1)   
Lymph node status    4.054 0.256 
 0 116 (99/17) 47 (42/5) 69 (57/12)   
 1 84 (76/8) 44 (37/7) 40 (39/1)   
 2 69 (60/9) 31 (24/7) 38 (36/2)   
 3 5 (4/1) 1 (1/0) 4 (3/1)   
 n/a 7 (7/0) 4 (4/0) 3 (3/0)   
Metastasis status    0.321 0.571 
 0 244 (213/31) 112 (94/18) 132 (119/13)   
 1 31 (27/4) 12 (11/1) 19 (16/3)   
 n/a 6 (6/0) 3 (3/0) 3 (3/0)   
Histological type    11.841 0.106 
 NSCLC 275 (241/34) 122 (104/18) 153 (137/16)   
  ADC 110 (91/19) 39* (30/9) 71* (61/10) 4.011* 0.045* 
  SCC 139 (126/13) 68* (59/9) 71* (67/4)   
  ADSQ. 3 (3/0) 1 (1/0) 2 (2/0)   
  Giant CC 12 (10/2) 7 (7/0) 5 (3/2)   
  Large CC 4 (4/0) 2 (2/0) 2 (2/0)   
  n/a 7 (7/0) 5 (5/0) 2 (2/0)   
 SCLC 4 (4/0) 3 (3/0) 1 (1/0)   
 NET 2 (1/1) 2 (1/1) 0 (0/0)   
Histological grade    3.431 0.634 
 Undifferentiated 11 (9/2) 6 (6/0) 5 (3/2)   
 High grade 10 (6/4) 3 (2/1) 7 (4/3)   
 Middle grade 106 (91/15) 52 (43/9) 54 (48/6)   
 Middle-low grade 12 (10/2) 4 (3/1) 8 (7/1)   
 Low grade 117 (108/9) 48 (43/5) 69 (65/4)   
 Well different. 10 (8/2) 4 (2/2) 6 (6/0)   
 n/a 15 (14/1) 10 (9/1) 5 (5/0)   

NOTE: ATX staining was arbitrarily designated as low (0–1) or high (2 or 3).

Abbreviations: ADC, adenocarcinoma; ADSQ, adenosquamous; CC, cell carcinoma; m/f, males/females; n/a, not available; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer.

Figure 1.

Increased pulmonary ATX staining in patients with lung cancer. A tissue microarray, composed of mainly NSCLC lung tissue samples as well as control samples, was immunostained for ATX. A, Representative images (×100) from healthy (n = 10), SCC (n = 139) or ADC (n = 110) tissue samples stained for ATX. B, ATX staining quantification attributing arbitrary intensity values ranging between 0 and 3. Statistical significance was assessed with a Wilcoxon-signed rank test; median values ± interquartile range are shown. ***, P < 0.001 over control values. C, The percentage of distribution of samples exhibiting low (0–1) or high (2–3) ATX staining. Staining scoring, patient's clinicopathological characteristics and their correlations are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Increased pulmonary ATX staining in patients with lung cancer. A tissue microarray, composed of mainly NSCLC lung tissue samples as well as control samples, was immunostained for ATX. A, Representative images (×100) from healthy (n = 10), SCC (n = 139) or ADC (n = 110) tissue samples stained for ATX. B, ATX staining quantification attributing arbitrary intensity values ranging between 0 and 3. Statistical significance was assessed with a Wilcoxon-signed rank test; median values ± interquartile range are shown. ***, P < 0.001 over control values. C, The percentage of distribution of samples exhibiting low (0–1) or high (2–3) ATX staining. Staining scoring, patient's clinicopathological characteristics and their correlations are shown in Table 1.

Close modal

Remarkably, a similarly paradoxical ATX expression profile was detected as well in two animal models of lung cancer, the genetically engineered model of the conditionally activated K-rasG12D oncogene (18) and the URE-induced chemical carcinogenesis model (20). In both these models ATX staining was detected in lung cancer cells (Fig. 2A and B; Supplementary Fig. S3A and S3B), whereas ATX activity levels were found increased in the BALFs of the same mice (Fig. 2C and D), correlating with total protein levels (Fig. 2E and F; r2 = 0,79/0,78, P = 0.001/0.002, respectively). In the K-rasG12D–driven model, unlike the URE-induced one, higher ATX activity levels were also observed in the plasma (Fig. 2G and H). In sharp contrast, pulmonary Enpp2, as well as Plpp3, mRNA expression was found downregulated in both animal models (Supplementary Fig. S4A–S4D), as shown for human patients. No major changes in the expression profile of LPARs was noted (Supplementary Fig. S4E and S4F).

Figure 2.

Increased pulmonary ATX levels in animal models of lung cancer (A, C, E, and G, URE-induced model; B, D, F, and H,K-rasG12D-driven model). A and B, Representative ATX immunostaining images from control (A, SAL; B, K-ras+/+) or cancer (A, URE; B, K-rasG12D/+) lung tissue samples. Additional images are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3. C and D, ATX activity levels in BALFs, as measured with the TOOS assay. E and F, Total protein levels in BALFs, as determined with the Bradford assay. G and H, ATX activity levels in plasmas, as measured with the TOOS assay. Statistical significance was assessed with the unpaired t test (C–F, and H; mean values ± SEM are shown) or Mann–Whitney rank sum test (G; median values ± interquartile range are shown); n = 5–7 for each experimental group and panel. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Figure 2.

Increased pulmonary ATX levels in animal models of lung cancer (A, C, E, and G, URE-induced model; B, D, F, and H,K-rasG12D-driven model). A and B, Representative ATX immunostaining images from control (A, SAL; B, K-ras+/+) or cancer (A, URE; B, K-rasG12D/+) lung tissue samples. Additional images are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3. C and D, ATX activity levels in BALFs, as measured with the TOOS assay. E and F, Total protein levels in BALFs, as determined with the Bradford assay. G and H, ATX activity levels in plasmas, as measured with the TOOS assay. Statistical significance was assessed with the unpaired t test (C–F, and H; mean values ± SEM are shown) or Mann–Whitney rank sum test (G; median values ± interquartile range are shown); n = 5–7 for each experimental group and panel. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Close modal

Conditional genetic deletion of Enpp2 from bronchial epithelial cells and macrophages diminishes URE-induced early neoplastic lesions

To examine whether the observed increased pulmonary ATX levels in lung cancer play a functional role in lung carcinogenesis, Enpp2 was conditionally deleted from bronchial epithelial cells and macrophages, the main pulmonary cells expressing ATX (14). To this end, Enpp2n/n mice (9) were mated with transgenic mouse strains expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of the CC10 (Scgb1a1) or the LysM promoters (14). As previously shown, CC10/LysM-directed genetic deletion of ATX, as verified with recombination assays, did not have any appreciable effects on lung development and architecture under healthy conditions (14). URE (1 g/Kg) was then injected intraperitoneally (IP) for 10 consecutive weeks to C57BL6/J CC10Enpp2−/or LysMEnpp2−/mice, as well as to control littermates (Enpp2n/n), and disease severity was examined 15 weeks after the last injection.

As expected (20), all control mice that received URE developed neoplastic lesions (100% incidence), ranging from atypical adenomatous hyperplasias (AAH) to adenomas (AD; Fig. 3A). Inflammation was not a prominent histopathologic feature, although many macrophages (giant cells) were noted near AAH lesions (Fig. 3A). Genetic deletion of Enpp2 in both CC10Enpp2−/or LysMEnpp2−/mice resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the number of URE-induced AAH (Fig. 3B and C), indicating a role for pulmonary ATX expression at the initial phases of URE-induced carcinogenesis. However, no statistically significant decreases in the number of AD were noted (Fig. 3D and E); moreover, the genetic deletions diminished but did not attenuate ATX BALF levels (Fig. 3F and G), suggesting extra-pulmonary sources of ATX.

Figure 3.

Conditional genetic deletion of Enpp2 from bronchial epithelial cells or macrophages diminishes urethane-induced early neoplastic lesions in the lung. A, Representative images from hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung tissue sections, indicating atypical AAHs or ADs; their numbers were counted in each mouse in four transverse sections spanning each lung. URE-induced AAH (B and C) or AD (D and E) in the indicated groups of mice/genotypes. F and G, ATX activity levels in BALFs, as measured with the TOOS assay. Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann–Whitney rank sum test (B, D, and F; n = 11–15; median values ± interquartile range are shown) or unpaired t test (C, E, and G; n = 7–8; mean values ± SEM are shown). *, P < 0.05.

Figure 3.

Conditional genetic deletion of Enpp2 from bronchial epithelial cells or macrophages diminishes urethane-induced early neoplastic lesions in the lung. A, Representative images from hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung tissue sections, indicating atypical AAHs or ADs; their numbers were counted in each mouse in four transverse sections spanning each lung. URE-induced AAH (B and C) or AD (D and E) in the indicated groups of mice/genotypes. F and G, ATX activity levels in BALFs, as measured with the TOOS assay. Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann–Whitney rank sum test (B, D, and F; n = 11–15; median values ± interquartile range are shown) or unpaired t test (C, E, and G; n = 7–8; mean values ± SEM are shown). *, P < 0.05.

Close modal

Ubiquitous genetic deletion of Lpar1, but not Lpar2, attenuates URE-induced carcinogenesis

Genetic deletion of Lpar1 has been shown to attenuate the development of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis (13), as was also shown for ATX (14), whereas pulmonary fibrosis is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer (15). Therefore, we next examined a possible contribution of LPAR1 in lung cancer development, through the administration of URE to Lpar1−/− mice and their WT littermates. It should be noted that since C57BL/6J Lpar1−/− mice are embryonically lethal (data not shown and ref. 16), Lpar1−/− mice were bred and maintained on a mixed C57BL/6J/129 genetic background, which is known to be more susceptible to URE-induced carcinogenesis (24). In accordance, WT C57BL/6J/129 mice developed an increased number of ADs, as compared to WT C57BL/6J mice, upon URE administration (Fig. 4A–C). Deletion of Lpar1 resulted in a reduction of the numbers of URE-induced ADs (Fig. 4C), confirming the participation of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer development. On the contrary, no such effect was observed in C57BL/6J Lpar2−/− mice (Fig. 4D–F), perhaps in line with a suggested anti-inflammatory role for LPAR2 in allergic airway inflammation (25).

Figure 4.

Genetic deletion of Lpar1, but not Lpar2, attenuates urethane-induced lung neoplasias. A and D, Representative images from hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung tissue sections from the indicated mice/genotypes post urethane administration. The numbers of URE-induced atypical AAHs or ADs were counted in each mouse in four transverse sections spanning each lung. URE-induced AAH (B and E) or AD (C and F) in the indicated groups of mice/genotypes. Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann–Whitney rank sum test; n = 4–7; median values ± IQR are shown; *, P < 0.05.

Figure 4.

Genetic deletion of Lpar1, but not Lpar2, attenuates urethane-induced lung neoplasias. A and D, Representative images from hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung tissue sections from the indicated mice/genotypes post urethane administration. The numbers of URE-induced atypical AAHs or ADs were counted in each mouse in four transverse sections spanning each lung. URE-induced AAH (B and E) or AD (C and F) in the indicated groups of mice/genotypes. Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann–Whitney rank sum test; n = 4–7; median values ± IQR are shown; *, P < 0.05.

Close modal

Enpp2 stochastic deletion in pulmonary cells diminishes BALF LPA levels and K-rasG12D–driven carcinogenesis

To confirm the procarcinogenic role of the ATX/LPA axis in another animal model of lung cancer, we next used the genetically engineered model of K-rasG12D/+(18). A replication-deficient adenovirus expressing the cre recombinase (Ad-Cre) was administered intratracheally to K-rasLSL-G12D/+Enpp2n/nmice, as well as to control K-rasLSL-G12D/+littermates, thus removing the synthetic stop element (LSL; lox-stop-lox) and allowing the expression of the oncogene and the overtime development of lung cancer, ranging from AAH to AD and ADC (18). At the same time, the adenoviral-delivered cre also deleted Enpp2 in the infected cells. Mice were then sacrificed 8 or 16 weeks post Ad-Cre administration and examined for neoplastic lesions (Fig. 5A and B). The stochastic genetic deletion of Enpp2 from pulmonary cells resulted in a significant reduction of AAHs at both time points (Fig. 5C and D), confirming the results from the URE model. A statistically non-significant reduction of ADs was observed at 8w post Ad-Cre administration, but not at 16w (Fig. 5E and F).

Figure 5.

Stochastic genetic deletion of Enpp2 from pulmonary cells diminishes K-rasG12D–driven neoplasias. K-rasG12D–driven lung carcinogenesis was assessed in the presence or absence of Enpp2, 8w (A, C, E, and G) or 16 w (B, D, F, and H) post Ad-Cre administration and oncogene activation. A and B, Representative images from hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung tissue sections 8w and 16w post oncogene activation. The numbers of K-rasG12D–driven AAHs, ADs, or ADCs were counted in each mouse in four transverse sections spanning each lung. K-rasG12D–driven AAH (C and D) or AD/ADC (E and F) in the indicated groups of mice/genotypes. G and H, ATX activity levels in BALFs, as determined with the TOOS assay. Total levels of LPC or LPA in BALF (I and K, respectively) and plasma (J and L, respectively) at both time points. Statistical significance was assessed with Mann–Whitney rank sum test (C, E, and F; median values ± interquartile range are shown), unpaired t test (D, G, and H; mean values ± SEM are shown) or one-way ANOVA and Fischer's LSD as a post-hoc test (I–L; mean values ± SEM are shown). A–H,n = 6–9; I–L,n = 3–8; *, P < 0.05.

Figure 5.

Stochastic genetic deletion of Enpp2 from pulmonary cells diminishes K-rasG12D–driven neoplasias. K-rasG12D–driven lung carcinogenesis was assessed in the presence or absence of Enpp2, 8w (A, C, E, and G) or 16 w (B, D, F, and H) post Ad-Cre administration and oncogene activation. A and B, Representative images from hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung tissue sections 8w and 16w post oncogene activation. The numbers of K-rasG12D–driven AAHs, ADs, or ADCs were counted in each mouse in four transverse sections spanning each lung. K-rasG12D–driven AAH (C and D) or AD/ADC (E and F) in the indicated groups of mice/genotypes. G and H, ATX activity levels in BALFs, as determined with the TOOS assay. Total levels of LPC or LPA in BALF (I and K, respectively) and plasma (J and L, respectively) at both time points. Statistical significance was assessed with Mann–Whitney rank sum test (C, E, and F; median values ± interquartile range are shown), unpaired t test (D, G, and H; mean values ± SEM are shown) or one-way ANOVA and Fischer's LSD as a post-hoc test (I–L; mean values ± SEM are shown). A–H,n = 6–9; I–L,n = 3–8; *, P < 0.05.

Close modal

Noteworthy, the effect of the Enpp2 genetic deletion on ATX BALF levels in K-rasG12D/+Enpp2−/−mice was prominent at 8w post Ad-Cre administration but negligible at 16w (Fig. G and H), suggesting that pulmonary cells have a significant contribution to ATX BALF levels at the initial phases of lung cancer development, likely complemented by extra-pulmonary sources at the late stages. In accordance, LPC levels, as measured with LC/MS/MS, were almost doubled in BALFs at 8w post lung cancer induction (Fig. 5I), and diminished in the corresponding plasmas (Fig. 5J); noteworthy, LPC has been shown to be a potent inducer of ATX expression in hepatocytes (12). BALF LPA levels were found increased at 16w in BALFs but not plasmas (Fig. 5K and L), indicating a role for LPA in K-rasG12D–driven lung cancer pathogenesis and stressing the importance of the downregulated PLPP3 levels, observed at this time point (Supplementary Fig. S4D), in LPA metabolism and lung cancer development. LPA levels were found diminished upon Enpp2 genetic deletion (Fig. 5K), reconfirming the key role of ATX in extracellular LPA production.

Mechanistic insights on the role of ATX/LPA in K-rasG12D–driven lung cancer pathogenesis

Consistent with the reported LPA effects in various cell types in vitro (4, 26), genetic deletion of Enpp2 and the attenuation of LPA levels resulted in a decrease in the proliferation of cancer cells, as assessed with PCNA staining, as well as a similar decrease in VEGFR2 staining, a marker of angiogenesis (Fig. 6A–D, respectively). However, no major changes were observed in p53 and PTEN staining (data not shown), that their levels have been suggested to be modulated from LPA in lung cancer cell lines in vitro.

Figure 6.

Decreased proliferation and angiogenesis upon stochastic genetic deletion of Enpp2 from pulmonary cells. A and B, Nuclear staining for proliferation marker PCNA is decreased in the lung tumors of K-rasG12D/+Enpp2−/− mice compared with the staining in the tumors of K-rasG12D/+ mice. A representative image of PCNA tumor staining is shown in A. Quantification of tumoral staining is presented as a percentage of stained cells over total cell number and is depicted in B; total optical fields assessed per group, n = 11–13. C and D, Staining for angiogenesis marker VEGFR2 in both early and late neoplastic lesions is lower in K-rasG12D/+Enpp2−/− than K-rasG12D/+ mice. A representative image of VEGFR2 tumoral staining is shown in C. Quantification of staining is presented in D, showing mean values of optical fields from each mouse and their total mean values ± SEM; n = 8. Statistical significance was assessed with unpaired t test; *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.

Figure 6.

Decreased proliferation and angiogenesis upon stochastic genetic deletion of Enpp2 from pulmonary cells. A and B, Nuclear staining for proliferation marker PCNA is decreased in the lung tumors of K-rasG12D/+Enpp2−/− mice compared with the staining in the tumors of K-rasG12D/+ mice. A representative image of PCNA tumor staining is shown in A. Quantification of tumoral staining is presented as a percentage of stained cells over total cell number and is depicted in B; total optical fields assessed per group, n = 11–13. C and D, Staining for angiogenesis marker VEGFR2 in both early and late neoplastic lesions is lower in K-rasG12D/+Enpp2−/− than K-rasG12D/+ mice. A representative image of VEGFR2 tumoral staining is shown in C. Quantification of staining is presented in D, showing mean values of optical fields from each mouse and their total mean values ± SEM; n = 8. Statistical significance was assessed with unpaired t test; *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.

Close modal

To obtain additional mechanistic insights into the mode of action of ATX/LPA in K-rasG12D–driven lung cancer pathogenesis, we performed mRNA expression profiling in whole lungs of K-rasG12D/+Enpp2+/+and K-rasG12D/+Enpp2−/mice 16w post induction. Limited by the heterogeneity of the cancerous lungs and the relatively small spread of cancer cells, 303 bona fide deregulated genes were identified (Supplementary Table S3; Fold change > 1.5; P < 0.05); only 60 out of them were found upregulated. Interestingly, gene set enrichment analysis indicated that, in the relative absence of ATX and upon lower LPA levels, the 243 downregulated genes were enriched in metabolic genes, including lipid metabolism (Supplementary Table S4). Therefore, these results suggest that the procarcinogenic effects of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer pathogenesis include metabolic rewiring, as was recently suggested for HCC (12). However, further studies are required to validate and dissect this intriguing hypothesis, that has multiple implications in LPA physiology and cancer biology.

The ENPP2 gene resides in the human chromosomal region 8q24, one of the most frequent regions of somatic copy number alterations (SCNA; ref. 27) and a region that contains potential susceptibility loci for various cancers, including lung cancer (28). The 8q24 locus has been suggested to regulate the expression of the proto-oncogene MYC (29), whereas LPA has been reported to stimulate Myc expression and was suggested to cooperate with it in cell transformation (30). Here, ENPP2 was in silico discovered to be genetically altered in 8% of a large cohort of patients with lung cancer (Supplementary Fig. S1), co-amplified, in 50% of the cases, with MYC that resides in the same region, one of the most frequently focally amplified genes in lung ADC (23). However, ENPP2 mRNA expression was found lower in cancerous biopsies than in normal lung tissue, in most patients with lung cancer cohorts' datasets and all samples examined (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S2). Noteworthy, ENPP2 was also reported as underexpressed in breast carcinomas despite a detected gene amplification, most likely due to the observed hypermethylation in promoter regions of the gene (8, 31), suggesting that epigenetic modifications could also downregulate ATX mRNA levels at the terminal stages of lung cancer.

Striking immunostaining for ATX, which has been scrutinized elsewhere (12, 14, 21), was detected in both ADCs and SCCs (Fig. 1). However, and given the reported downregulated ENPP2 mRNA levels in lung cancer, it is unlikely that the observed increased ATX levels are derived from the cancer cells themselves, as previously reported for breast cancer (32). ATX has been shown to engage integrins β1 and β3 at the surface of platelets and cancer cells (33–35), both of which correlate with short survival in patients with early NSCLC (36) and participate in heterodimers associated with disease progression in various cancers (37). Therefore, it cannot be excluded that locally secreted or extravasated ATX can bind to the surface of lung cancer cells via integrins, thus avoiding clearance while exerting locally produced LPA effects and establishing a permissive microenvironment for cancer growth. In addition, PLPP3 expression was discovered to be lower in all lung cancer datasets and samples examined (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting an additional mechanism to maintain high levels of LPA on the surface of tumor cells, because PLPP3 is a transmembrane protein shown to degrade extracellular LPA (5).

Mouse models for lung cancer are valuable tools for deciphering tumor biology, as well as for the development and validation of new tumor intervention strategies. In this study, we employed the two most widely used, the carcinogen (URE)–induced and the genetically engineered K-RasG12D-driven, that represent the two major types of human lung cancer from a genomic perspective, one principally with somatic mutations and the other with SCNAs respectively (27, 38). Identical results regarding Enpp2 expression have been obtained in both models, remarkably phenocopying the human data: increased ATX activity was measured in BALFs and ATX staining was detected in cancer cells (Fig. 2); however, Enpp2, as well as Plpp3, mRNA levels were found downregulated in whole lung samples (Supplementary Fig. S4). Importantly, the mouse studies revealed that ATX levels correlated with total protein in BALFs, indicative of endothelial permeability and pulmonary edema, suggesting that a large part of pulmonary ATX derives from the circulation during carcinogenesis. Moreover, ATX has been reported to be released from human platelets upon tumor cell–induced aggregation (35), suggesting an additional possible source of ATX. Noteworthy, 40% of plasma ATX is thought to derive from the adipose tissue (39), known to secrete various hormones and cytokines (adipokines) that exhibit significant systemic effects on various pathophysiological processes, including lipid metabolism, inflammation, and cancer (40).

Genetic deletion of Enpp2 from its major pulmonary source—the bronchial epithelium (CC10+), as well as from monocytic (LysM+) cells, resulted in a marked reduction of AAHs (Fig. 3), the first neoplastic lesions that develop upon carcinogen-induced carcinogenesis. Comparable results were obtained upon the stochastic genetic deletion of Enpp2 in pulmonary (most likely epithelial) cells upon K-rasG12D-driven lung carcinogenesis (Fig. 5), suggesting that local pulmonary ATX expression plays a role in tumor initiation. ATX deletion was accompanied by lower LPA BALF levels (Fig. 5), reaffirming that ATX exerts its effects through the local production of LPA. It has been proposed that LPA can downregulate ATX expression levels in some cells and conditions (41), providing an additional explanation for the low Enpp2 mRNA levels at the terminal stages of both human (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S2) and mouse (Supplementary Fig. S4) lung cancer. LPA levels remained high most likely due to the enzymatic action of extravasated ATX and/or due to a marked reduction in Plpp3 expression upon carcinogenesis (Supplementary Fig. S4).

The genetic deletion of ATX from pulmonary cells in both models did not result in a significant reduction in AD development, most likely due to the recruitment of ATX from the circulation that complements or even outweighs local pulmonary expression. However, the participation of the ATX/LPA axis in lung cancer development was ultimately proven in Lpar1 knock out mice, where a significant decrease of ADs upon URE-induced carcinogenesis was observed (Fig. 4). LPAR1 expression and signaling has been also shown as a pathogenic determinant of pulmonary fibrosis (13); therefore, these results further extend the similarities between lung fibrosis and cancer (15). LPAR2, which is hardly expressed in pulmonary cells (Supplementary Fig. S4; ref. 7), was shown to have minor effects in URE-induced lung cancer (Fig. 4). LPAR6 is highly expressed in the liver and HCC (12, 42) and has been shown to support liver tumorigenesis (42). LPAR6 is also the highest expressing LPAR in the lung (Supplementary Fig. S4), but its role in pulmonary pathophysiology has not been explored yet.

LPAR1 couples to at least three distinct G proteins (Gq, Gi and G12/13), which in turn feed into multiple effector pathways, including activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) cascades, leading to cytoskeletal rearrangements and to increased proliferation (Fig. 6) and motility (4, 6, 7, 26). Noteworthy, these LPA-stimulated signaling pathways are shared with many of the established players and therapeutic targets in lung carcinogenesis, such as K-RAS and EGFR. Therefore, costimulation by LPAR1 and its associated G-proteins could lower their activation thresholds, thus promoting disease initiation and progression. In addition to these direct effects to cancer cells, LPA has been also suggested to regulate angiogenesis (Fig. 6; ref. 43), as well as pulmonary vascular leak (13), facilitating the influx of inflammatory and growth factors. An involvement of the ATX/LPA axis in cancer immunoregulation is also likely, since ATX has been reported to adhere to lymphocytes facilitating their homing (44), whereas increased ATX staining has been reported at lymphoid aggregates in patients tissue, including NSCLC (21, 45). Moreover, all immune cells were shown to possess some LPARs, and LPA has been recently proposed to convert monocytes into macrophages (46).

Beyond these established or suggested ATX/LPA effects in various hallmarks of cancer, a novel metabolic function of the axis in carcinogenesis is emerging. ATX/LPA were recently shown, both in vitro and in vivo, to play a role in liver lipid metabolism during HCC development, regulating triglyceride (TGA) levels (12). Expression profiling of modeled HCC in the absence of hepatocyte ATX expression, indicated genes that are involved in lipid metabolism (12). Intriguingly, similar deregulated metabolic pathways were also discovered in lung cancer (Supplementary Table S4), and several related liver specific genes were found activated by ATX/LPA in the lung (Supplementary Table S3), suggesting that LPA-induced metabolic rewiring is not confined to the liver. However, further studies are needed to establish a direct causative relationship and to dissect a possible involvement of these complex and redundant pathways. Finally, many genes involved in drug metabolism and/or resistance were discovered to be affected by ATX/LPA during lung (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4) and liver (12) carcinogenesis. Accordingly, ATX has been suggested to protect cancer cells from taxol-induced apoptosis (47) and to mediate the acquired resistance against sunitinib, cisplatin and adriamycin (48, 49). Moreover, LPA signaling was shown to induce the Nrf2-mediated expression of multi-drug resistance transporters and antioxidant genes (50), suggesting that therapeutic targeting of the ATX/LPA axis could be useful as an adjuvant therapy.

In summary, strong indications on a possible involvement of the ATX/PLPP3-LPA/LPAR1 axis in lung carcinogenesis, in both human patients and mouse animal models were provided. Furthermore, genetic deletion of Enpp2 and Lpar1 was shown to attenuate cancer development in animal models, thus establishing a procarcinogenic role of the axis in lung cancer pathogenesis, expanding the mechanistic links of pulmonary fibrosis and cancer, while further revealing possible LPA effects in tumor metabolism, an emerging hallmark.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: D. Bouros, K. Syrigos, V. Aidinis

Development of methodology: C. Magkrioti, N. Oikonomou, G.T. Stathopoulos, E. Bouros, D. Bouros

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): C. Magkrioti, N. Oikonomou, E. Kaffe, M.-A. Mouratis, I. Barbayianni, V. Harokopos, C. Valavanis, J. Chun, A. Kosma, E. Bouros, D. Bouros, K. Syrigos

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): C. Magkrioti, N. Oikonomou, E. Kaffe, M.-A. Mouratis, V. Harokopos, C. Valavanis, G.T. Stathopoulos, K. Syrigos

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: C. Magkrioti, M.-A. Mouratis, J. Chun, E. Bouros, D. Bouros, K. Syrigos, V. Aidinis

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): C. Magkrioti, N. Xylourgidis, I. Barbayianni, P. Megadoukas

Study supervision: D. Bouros, K. Syrigos, V. Aidinis

Other (performing immunohistochemistry evaluation of human and mouse pathology and immunohistochemical data): C. Valavanis

This research has been co-financed in part by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) and Greek national funds through the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) and the Operational Programs "Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship" (#09SYN-11-679 and 09SYN-12-680 to V. Aidinis; MIS 5002562 to BSRC Fleming), as well as the National co-funding of European programs (#2006ΣE01330024—ΣAE 013/3). C. Magkrioti was supported by a scholarship from the State Scholarships Foundation (#4688; IKY/Siemens-excellence).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Herbst
RS
,
Heymach
JV
,
Lippman
SM
. 
Lung CANCER
.
N Engl J Med
2008
;
359
:
1367
80
.
2.
Swanton
C
,
Govindan
R
. 
Clinical implications of genomic discoveries in lung cancer
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
374
:
1864
73
.
3.
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research N
. 
Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma
.
Nature
2014
;
511
:
543
50
.
4.
Barbayianni
E
,
Kaffe
E
,
Aidinis
V
,
Kokotos
G
. 
Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, as a promising therapeutic target in chronic inflammation and cancer
.
Prog Lipid Res
2015
;
58
:
76
96
.
5.
Tang
X
,
Benesch
MG
,
Brindley
DN
. 
Lipid phosphate phosphatases and their roles in mammalian physiology and pathology
.
J Lipid Res
2015
;
56
:
2048
60
.
6.
Aikawa
S
,
Hashimoto
T
,
Kano
K
,
Aoki
J
. 
Lysophosphatidic acid as a lipid mediator with multiple biological actions
.
J Biochem
2015
;
157
:
81
9
.
7.
Choi
JW
,
Herr
DR
,
Noguchi
K
,
Yung
YC
,
Lee
CW
,
Mutoh
T
, et al
LPA receptors: subtypes and biological actions
.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol
2010
;
50
:
157
86
.
8.
Benesch
MGK
,
Yang
Z
,
Tang
X
,
Meng
G
,
Brindley
DN
. 
Lysophosphatidate Signaling: The Tumor Microenvironment's New Nemesis
.
Trends in Cancer
2017
;
3
:
748
52
.
9.
Fotopoulou
S
,
Oikonomou
N
,
Grigorieva
E
,
Nikitopoulou
I
,
Paparountas
T
,
Thanassopoulou
A
, et al
ATX expression and LPA signalling are vital for the development of the nervous system
.
Dev Biol
2010
;
339
:
451
64
.
10.
Katsifa
A
,
Kaffe
E
,
Nikolaidou-Katsaridou
N
,
Economides
AN
,
Newbigging
S
,
McKerlie
C
, et al
The Bulk of Autotaxin Activity Is Dispensable for Adult Mouse Life
.
PLoS One
2015
;
10
:
e0143083
.
11.
Liu
S
,
Umezu-Goto
M
,
Murph
M
,
Lu
Y
,
Liu
W
,
Zhang
F
, et al
Expression of autotaxin and lysophosphatidic acid receptors increases mammary tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastases
.
Cancer Cell
2009
;
15
:
539
50
.
12.
Kaffe
E
,
Katsifa
A
,
Xylourgidis
N
,
Ninou
I
,
Zannikou
M
,
Harokopos
V
, et al
Hepatocyte Autotaxin expression promotes liver fibrosis and cancer
.
Hepatology
2017
;
65
:
1369
1383
.
13.
Tager
AM
,
LaCamera
P
,
Shea
BS
,
Campanella
GS
,
Selman
M
,
Zhao
Z
, et al
The lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA1 links pulmonary fibrosis to lung injury by mediating fibroblast recruitment and vascular leak
.
Nat Med
2008
;
14
:
45
54
.
14.
Oikonomou
N
,
Mouratis
MA
,
Tzouvelekis
A
,
Kaffe
E
,
Valavanis
C
,
Vilaras
G
, et al
Pulmonary autotaxin expression contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis
.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
2012
;
47
:
566
74
.
15.
King
CS
,
Nathan
SD
. 
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: effects and optimal management of comorbidities
.
Lancet Respir Med
2017
;
5
:
72
84
.
16.
Contos
JJ
,
Fukushima
N
,
Weiner
JA
,
Kaushal
D
,
Chun
J
. 
Requirement for the lpA1 lysophosphatidic acid receptor gene in normal suckling behavior
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000
;
97
:
13384
9
.
17.
Contos
JJ
,
Ishii
I
,
Fukushima
N
,
Kingsbury
MA
,
Ye
X
,
Kawamura
S
, et al
Characterization of lpa(2) (Edg4) and lpa(1)/lpa(2) (Edg2/Edg4) lysophosphatidic acid receptor knockout mice: signaling deficits without obvious phenotypic abnormality attributable to lpa(2)
.
Mol Cell Biol
2002
;
22
:
6921
9
.
18.
Johnson
L
,
Mercer
K
,
Greenbaum
D
,
Bronson
RT
,
Crowley
D
,
Tuveson
DA
, et al
Somatic activation of the K-ras oncogene causes early onset lung cancer in mice
.
Nature
2001
;
410
:
1111
6
.
19.
DuPage
M
,
Dooley
AL
,
Jacks
T
. 
Conditional mouse lung cancer models using adenoviral or lentiviral delivery of Cre recombinase
.
Nat Protoc
2009
;
4
:
1064
72
.
20.
Stathopoulos
GT
,
Sherrill
TP
,
Cheng
DS
,
Scoggins
RM
,
Han
W
,
Polosukhin
VV
, et al
Epithelial NF-kappaB activation promotes urethane-induced lung carcinogenesis
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2007
;
104
:
18514
9
.
21.
Nikitopoulou
I
,
Oikonomou
N
,
Karouzakis
E
,
Sevastou
I
,
Nikolaidou-Katsaridou
N
,
Zhao
Z
, et al
Autotaxin expression from synovial fibroblasts is essential for the pathogenesis of modeled arthritis
.
J Exp Med
2012
;
209
:
925
33
.
22.
Gao
J
,
Aksoy
BA
,
Dogrusoz
U
,
Dresdner
G
,
Gross
B
,
Sumer
SO
, et al
Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal
.
Sci Signal
2013
;
6
:
pl1
.
23.
Campbell
JD
,
Alexandrov
A
. 
Distinct patterns of somatic genome alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas
.
Nat Genet
2016
;
48
:
607
16
.
24.
Malkinson
AM
. 
Genetic studies on lung tumor susceptibility and histogenesis in mice
.
Environ Health Perspect
1991
;
93
:
149
59
.
25.
Emo
J
,
Meednu
N
,
Chapman
TJ
,
Rezaee
F
,
Balys
M
,
Randall
T
, et al
Lpa2 is a negative regulator of both dendritic cell activation and murine models of allergic lung inflammation
.
J Immunol
2012
;
188
:
3784
90
.
26.
Magkrioti
C
,
Aidinis
V
. 
ATX and LPA signalling in lung pathophysiology
.
World J Respirol
2013
;
3
:
77
103
.
27.
Ciriello
G
,
Miller
ML
,
Aksoy
BA
,
Senbabaoglu
Y
,
Schultz
N
,
Sander
C
. 
Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers
.
Nat Genet
2013
;
45
:
1127
33
.
28.
Brisbin
AG
,
Asmann
YW
,
Song
H
,
Tsai
YY
,
Aakre
JA
,
Yang
P
, et al
Meta-analysis of 8q24 for seven cancers reveals a locus between NOV and ENPP2 associated with cancer development
.
BMC Med Genet
2011
;
12
:
156
.
29.
Grisanzio
C
,
Freedman
ML
. 
Chromosome 8q24-Associated Cancers and MYC
.
Genes & cancer
2010
;
1
:
555
9
.
30.
Samadi
N
,
Bekele
R
,
Capatos
D
,
Venkatraman
G
,
Sariahmetoglu
M
,
Brindley
DN
. 
Regulation of lysophosphatidate signaling by autotaxin and lipid phosphate phosphatases with respect to tumor progression, angiogenesis, metastasis and chemo-resistance
.
Biochimie
2011
;
93
:
61
70
.
31.
Parris
TZ
,
Kovacs
A
,
Hajizadeh
S
,
Nemes
S
,
Semaan
M
,
Levin
M
, et al
Frequent MYC coamplification and DNA hypomethylation of multiple genes on 8q in 8p11-p12-amplified breast carcinomas
.
Oncogenesis
2014
;
3
:
e95
.
32.
Benesch
MG
,
Tang
X
,
Maeda
T
,
Ohhata
A
,
Zhao
YY
,
Kok
BP
, et al
Inhibition of autotaxin delays breast tumor growth and lung metastasis in mice
.
Faseb J
2014
;
28
:
2655
66
.
33.
Fulkerson
Z
,
Wu
T
,
Sunkara
M
,
Kooi
CV
,
Morris
AJ
,
Smyth
SS
. 
Binding of autotaxin to integrins localizes lysophosphatidic acid production to platelets and mammalian cells
.
J Biol Chem
2011
;
286
:
34654
63
.
34.
Hausmann
J
,
Kamtekar
S
,
Christodoulou
E
,
Day
JE
,
Wu
T
,
Fulkerson
Z
, et al
Structural basis of substrate discrimination and integrin binding by autotaxin
.
Nat Struct Mol Biol
2011
;
18
:
198
204
.
35.
Leblanc
R
,
Lee
SC
,
David
M
,
Bordet
JC
,
Norman
DD
,
Patil
R
, et al
Interaction of platelet-derived autotaxin with tumor integrin alphaVbeta3 controls metastasis of breast cancer cells to bone
.
Blood
2014
;
124
:
3141
50
.
36.
Dingemans
AM
,
van den Boogaart
V
,
Vosse
BA
,
van Suylen
RJ
,
Griffioen
AW
,
Thijssen
VL
. 
Integrin expression profiling identifies integrin alpha5 and beta1 as prognostic factors in early stage non-small cell lung cancer
.
Mol Cancer
2010
;
9
:
152
.
37.
Desgrosellier
JS
,
Cheresh
DA
. 
Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2010
;
10
:
9
22
.
38.
Westcott
PM
,
Halliwill
KD
,
To
MD
,
Rashid
M
,
Rust
AG
,
Keane
TM
, et al
The mutational landscapes of genetic and chemical models of Kras-driven lung cancer
.
Nature
2014
;
517
:
489
92
.
39.
Dusaulcy
R
,
Rancoule
C
,
Gres
S
,
Wanecq
E
,
Colom
A
,
Guigne
C
, et al
Adipose-specific disruption of autotaxin enhances nutritional fattening and reduces plasma lysophosphatidic acid
.
J Lipid Res
2011
;
52
:
1247
55
.
40.
Federico
L
,
Jeong
KJ
,
Vellano
CP
,
Mills
GB
. 
Autotaxin, a lysophospholipase D with pleomorphic effects in oncogenesis and cancer progression
.
J Lipid Res
2016
;
57
:
25
35
.
41.
Benesch
MG
,
Zhao
YY
,
Curtis
JM
,
McMullen
TP
,
Brindley
DN
. 
Regulation of autotaxin expression and secretion by lysophosphatidate and sphingosine 1-phosphate
.
J Lipid Res
2015
;
56
:
1134
44
.
42.
Mao
XY
,
Lee
MJ
,
Zhu
J
,
Zhu
C
,
Law
SM
,
Snijders
AM
. 
Genome-wide screen identifies a novel prognostic signature for breast cancer survival
.
Oncotarget
2017
;
8
:
14003
16
.
43.
Chen
Y
,
Ramakrishnan
DP
,
Ren
B
. 
Regulation of angiogenesis by phospholipid lysophosphatidic Acid
.
Front Biosci
2013
;
18
:
852
61
.
44.
Kanda
H
,
Newton
R
,
Klein
R
,
Morita
Y
,
Gunn
MD
,
Rosen
SD
. 
Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs
.
Nat Immunol
2008
;
9
:
415
23
.
45.
Yang
Y
,
Mou
L
,
Liu
N
,
Tsao
MS
. 
Autotaxin expression in non-small-cell lung cancer
.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
1999
;
21
:
216
22
.
46.
Ray
R
,
Rai
V
. 
Lysophosphatidic acid converts monocytes into macrophages in both mice and humans
.
Blood
2017
;
129
:
1177
1183
.
47.
Samadi
N
,
Gaetano
C
,
Goping
IS
,
Brindley
DN
. 
Autotaxin protects MCF-7 breast cancer and MDA-MB-435 melanoma cells against Taxol-induced apoptosis
.
Oncogene
2009
;
28
:
1028
39
.
48.
Su
SC
,
Hu
X
,
Kenney
PA
,
Merrill
MM
,
Babaian
KN
,
Zhang
XY
, et al
Autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid signaling axis mediates tumorigenesis and development of acquired resistance to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2013
;
19
:
6461
72
.
49.
Shuyu
E
,
Lai
YJ
,
Tsukahara
R
,
Chen
CS
,
Fujiwara
Y
,
Yue
J
, et al
Lysophosphatidic acid 2 receptor-mediated supramolecular complex formation regulates its antiapoptotic effect
.
J Biol Chem
2009
;
284
:
14558
71
.
50.
Venkatraman
G
,
Benesch
MG
,
Tang
X
,
Dewald
J
,
McMullen
TP
,
Brindley
DN
. 
Lysophosphatidate signaling stabilizes Nrf2 and increases the expression of genes involved in drug resistance and oxidative stress responses: implications for cancer treatment
.
Faseb J
2014
;
29
:
772
85
.