Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine strategies aimed at targeting cancer stem–like cells (CSC) may be most efficacious if deployed in the adjuvant setting. In this study, we offer preclinical evidence that this is the case for a CSC-DC vaccine as tested in murine models of SCC7 squamous cell cancer and D5 melanoma. Vaccination of mice with an ALDHhigh SCC7 CSC-DC vaccine after surgical excision of established SCC7 tumors reduced local tumor relapse and prolonged host survival. This effect was augmented significantly by simultaneous administration of anti-PD-L1, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. In the minimal disease setting of D5 melanoma, treatment of mice with ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccination inhibited primary tumor growth, reduced spontaneous lung metastases, and increased host survival. In this setting, CCR10 and its ligands were downregulated on ALDHhigh D5 CSCs and in lung tissues, respectively, after vaccination with ALDHhigh D5 CSC-DC. RNAi-mediated attenuation of CCR10 blocked tumor cell migration in vitro and metastasis in vivo. T cells harvested from mice vaccinated with ALDHhigh D5 CSC-DC selectively killed ALDHhigh D5 CSCs, with additional evidence of humoral immunologic engagement and a reduction in ALDHhigh cells in residual tumors. Overall, our results offered a preclinical proof of concept for the use of ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccines in the adjuvant setting to more effectively limit local tumor recurrence and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis, as compared with traditional DC vaccines, with increased host survival further accentuated by simultaneous PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Res; 76(16); 4661–72. ©2016 AACR.

Although surgical resection has been a standard treatment for solid malignancies, therapeutic efficacy is limited by both local and distant recurrence (1–3). There are many factors associated with tumor recurrence (4, 5). Several reports have described strategies to eliminate residual tumor cells after surgery (3, 6). However, effectively preventing local tumor recurrence remains a significant challenge. The existence of micrometastasis at the time of tumor resection represents an even greater therapeutic challenge, as 90% of tumor-related deaths are due to tumor metastasis. There is increasing evidence that many cancers are driven and maintained by a subpopulation of cells that display stem cell properties. Cancer stem cells (CSC) can self-renew, mediate tumor growth, and contribute to tumor recurrence and metastasis (7–9). Targeting CSCs may thus increase the therapeutic efficacy of current cancer treatment.

ALDEFLUOR/ALDH (aldehyde dehydrogenase) activity has been successfully used as a marker to enrich CSC populations in a variety of cancers (10–17). We previously demonstrated that ALDHhigh murine squamous carcinoma SCC7 and D5 melanoma cells were highly enriched for tumor-initiating capacity (15). Their protective immunogenicity was evaluated by administering CSC-based dendritic cell (DC) vaccines in syngeneic immunocompetent hosts (15). In a recent study (17), we demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy conferred by an ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine in the treatment of established tumors after localized radiotherapy.

Eliminating microscopic residual disease in the tumor bed is important in preventing local disease recurrence. Administration of CSC-based vaccines after surgical excision of tumor, where local recurrence is high, may reduce local tumor relapse and distant metastasis and possibly improve survival. Furthermore, as CSCs mediate tumor metastasis, targeting this cell population in the adjuvant setting may eliminate micrometastasis prolonging survival. In this study, we evaluated the potential therapeutic efficacy of this approach in the adjuvant setting using CSC-DC vaccination following surgical resection of the tumor, or by treatment of minimal disease.

We developed a vaccination strategy utilizing cell lysates from ALDHhigh SCC7 or D5 CSCs to pulse dendritic cells (CSC-DC). DCs pulsed with ALDHlow SCC7 or D5 non-CSC lysate (ALDHlow-DC), or with heterogeneous, unsorted cell lysate (H-DC) served as controls. Vaccination with ALDHhigh CSC-DC in immunocompetent mice significantly inhibited SCC7 local tumor recurrence after surgery, and inhibited minimal D5 tumor growth with prolonged survival significantly more than either ALDHlow-DC or H-DC vaccination. Furthermore, this effect was accentuated by simultaneous PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade.

Mice

Female C3H/HeNCr MTV (C3H) mice and C57BL/6 (B6) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and Charles River Laboratories (15). The University of Michigan Laboratory of Animal Medicine approved all animal protocols.

Culture of tumor cells

The squamous carcinoma cell line, SCC7, produces a poorly immunogenic tumor and is syngeneic to C3H mice. D5 is a clone of the melanoma cell line B16, which is syngeneic to B6 mice, and was originally established in our laboratory. The cell lines were grown in complete medium consisting of RPMI1640 and supplements (15).

ALDEFLUOR assay

The ALDEFLUOR Kit (StemCell Technologies) was used to isolate ALDEFLUOR+/ALDHhigh CSCs from the SCC7 and D5 cells (15).

Preparation of DC vaccine

Tumor cell lysates of unsorted, ALDEFLUOR+/ALDHhigh, or ALDEFLUOR/ALDHlow SCC7 and D5 cells were prepared as described previously (15). Bone marrow–derived murine cells were cultured in 10-mL complete medium (CM) supplemented with 20 ng/mL GM-CSF at a concentration of 0.2–0.4 × 106 cells/mL in non-tissue culture petri dishes (Corning) on day 0. Fresh medium supplemented with 20 ng/mL GM-CSF was added on days 3 (10 mL). On day 6 and 8, 10 mL of cultured cell suspension was taken from each dish, respectively, centrifuged, and the pellet resuspended in 10 mL of fresh CM with 20 ng/mL of GM-CSF, and added back to each dish. On day 10, DCs were harvested by dispenser and enriched by Opti-Prep density gradient medium. Lysates of unsorted, ALDHlow, or ALDHhigh cells were added to DCs at a 1:3 cell equivalent ratio. The DCs were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours with 5% CO2. After incubation, the unsorted tumor cell lysate–pulsed DCs (H-DC), ALDHlow lysate–pulsed DCs (ALDHlow-DC), or ALDHhigh lysate–pulsed DCs (ALDHhigh-DC, e.g., CSC-DC) were used as vaccine as specified in the subsequent experiments.

Tumor model and treatment protocols

C3H mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 0.5 × 106 SCC7 cells on day 0. On day 21, the mice were subjected to surgical tumor resection except for one group serving as control. The animals with the subcutaneous tumor removed were then divided into 4 groups (n = 5), and administrated with PBS, H-DC, ALDHlow SCC7-DC, and ALDHhigh SCC7 CSC-DC vaccine, respectively, 24 hours after tumor resection. The vaccination was repeated on day 29 and day 36, respectively. Each mouse was inoculated subcutaneously with 2 × 106 DCs per vaccine. In additional experiments, when SCC7 CSC-DC was used in combination with an anti-PD-L1 antibody (MedImmune Inc.), the vaccination was only repeated once on day 29 with anti-PD-L1 administration. In the minimal tumor model, B6 mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5,000 D5 cells. The first vaccine was administered subcutaneously 24 hours after tumor inoculation, followed by a second vaccine on day 8. Each vaccine comprised 2 × 106 DCs. The long and short diameters of tumor masses, as well as the tumor volumes, were measured three times per week. The volumes were calculated as: tumor volume = (width2 × length)/2. Survival was monitored and recorded as the percentage of survivors after tumor inoculation.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining for histologic analysis

At the conclusion of the experiments, the lungs were harvested and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to discern the histopathologic response.

Measurement of chemokine receptor and PD-L1 expression on tumor cells

Freshly harvested subcutaneous D5 tumors were disaggregated into single-cell suspensions (18). Unsorted, ALDHhigh, and ALDHlow D5 cells were then, respectively, incubated with PE-anti-CCR10 for flow cytometry analysis with a BD LSR-cytometer. To evaluate the PD-L1 levels in the CSC and non-CSC populations after treatment, D5 tumors were harvested at the end of therapy to prepare tumor cell suspensions. These tumor cells were then incubated with PE-anti-PD-L1 (BioLegend), followed by staining with ALDEFLUOR (FITC) for ALDHhigh and ALDHlow population isolation as described in the section “ALDEFLUOR assay.” The ALDHhigh (CSC) and ALDHlow (non-CSC) D5 tumor cells were then examined by flow cytometry for PD-L1 expression.

Detection of chemokine expression in lung tissues

The mRNA expression levels of chemokines CCL27 and CCL28 in lung tissues were analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR; ref. 17). The preparations of the total RNA and cDNA were described previously (19). The data were expressed as the relative fold change.

Ccr10 gene silencing

Equal doses of Ccr10 siRNA and negative siRNA (Qiagen) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions to transfer unsorted, ALDHhigh, and ALDHlow D5 cells for 48 hours to inhibit CCR10 expression. Cells (106) were then resuspended and RNA extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Five milligrams of total RNA was reverse transcribed (M-MLV, Invitrogen) to generate cDNA for subsequent RT-PCR. Platinum SYBR Supermix (Invitrogen) was used to amplify sequences for Ccr10 (forward: CAGTCTTCGTGTGGCTGTTGTC; reverse: TCACAGTCTGCGTGAGGCTTTC) and GAPDH (forward: TGAAGCAGGCATCTGAGGG; reverse: CGAAGGTGGAAGAGTGGGAG) using a standard three-step protocol (35 cycles of 30 seconds each at 95°C, 58°C, and 72°C). Melting point analysis verified the presence of single products.

Chemotaxis assay

RPMI1640 (500 μL) containing 1 × 106 D5 cells or Ccr10 siRNA–transferred D5 cells were added to the top chamber of a Transwell (insert pore size, 8 μm; Corning). Chemokines CCL27 and CCL28 (R&D Systems) were added to the bottom chamber in a volume of 750-μL RPMI1640, which contained 20% FBS. After incubation at 37°C for 27 hours, the cells that migrated to the bottom surface of membrane were stained with Diff-Quik set (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc). Cells were photographed under the microscope at 200× magnifications, and counted in 5 fields of triplicate membranes.

Purification and culture of host B cells and T cells

Spleens were harvested from animals subjected to various treatments at the end of the experiments. Splenic B cells were purified and activated in CM supplemented with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma), anti-CD40 (AdipoGen), and IL2 (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.; ref. 15). The culture supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C for future experiments. Splenic T cells were purified and activated to generate CTLs that were analyzed in LDH cytotoxicity assays (15).

CSC binding by immune supernatant and antibody/complement–mediated cytotoxicity

Sorted ALDHihgh or ALDHlow D5 cells were incubated with the immune supernatants collected from the cultured B cells with equal quantities of IgG followed by incubation with the second FITC–conjugated anti-mouse IgG. The binding of supernatant antibody to ALDHhigh versus ALDHlow D5 cells was assessed using flow cytometry (15). Antibody and complement-mediated cytotoxicity against CSCs was measured as described previously (15).

Statistical analysis

Survival analysis was determined by the log-rank test. Analysis for the presence of lung metastasis was performed using the Fisher exact test. Other data were evaluated by unpaired Student t test (2 cohorts) or one-way ANOVA (>2 cohorts).

An ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine significantly inhibited tumor recurrence and prolonged animal survival after surgical resection of head and neck SCC7 tumors

We previously demonstrated that administration of ALDHhigh SCC7 CSC-DC vaccines in immunocompetent mice induces protection against subsequent SCC7 challenge (15). In this study, we examined the therapeutic potential of CSC-DC vaccination to prevent local tumor recurrence, reduce metastasis, and prolong survival when deployed in the adjuvant/early disease settings. The first model employed surgical excision of SCC7 subcutaneous head and neck squamous carcinomas, a tumor in which local recurrence contributes to patient mortality and morbidity (20, 21). C3H mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 0.5 × 106 SCC7 tumor cells. Resulting tumors were surgically excised 21 days after inoculation, followed by vaccination with DCs pulsed with lysates of heterogeneous unsorted SCC7 cells (H-DC), ALDHlow SCC7 cells (ALDHlow-DC), or ALDHhigh SCC7 cells (ALDHhigh –DC). Vaccines were administrated once per week for 3 weeks starting on the second day postsurgery. Mice were subsequently monitored for local tumor recurrence and survival.

As shown in Fig. 1, there was 100% mortality in tumor-bearing mice without tumor resection by day 40 due to progressive tumor growth. In PBS control mice, tumor recurrence was noted beginning on day 30 and all mice ultimately died by day 55 due to tumor growth. The H-DC and ALDHlow-DC vaccination delayed tumor recurrence, resulting in prolonged animal survival compared with control mice. More importantly, the ALDHhigh-DC (CSC-DC) vaccine significantly reduced tumor recurrence compared with the PBS control (P < 0.0001), H-DC (P = 0.0221), and ALDHlow-DC (P = 0.0495) vaccination, respectively (Fig. 1A). As a result, the ALDHhigh-DC treatment significantly increased animal survival compared with the other treatments or control mice (Fig. 1B). While only 50% of the mice in H-DC and ALDHlow-DC–treated groups survived until day 65, all of the mice treated with the ALDHhigh-DC vaccine survived until that timepoint. These results demonstrate the ability of the ALDHhigh-DC vaccine to reduce local recurrence and prolong survival in this model of SCC.

Figure 1.

A, DCs pulsed with ALDHhigh SCC7 CSCs significantly inhibited tumor recurrence. Twenty-one days after inoculation of SCC7 cells, s.c, tumors were surgically removed and animals were treated with different vaccines as indicated on day 22, day 29, and day 36, except for the “no tumor resection” group as a control. Tumor volume (mean ± SEM) is shown. B, DCs pulsed with ALDHhigh SCC7 CSCs significantly prolonged the animal survival after surgical resection of the subcutaneous SCC7 tumors. Data are representative of three experiments independently performed. C, administration of anti-PD-L1 significantly inhibited tumor recurrence in animals treated with suboptima1 doses (2 vs. 3 in A) of ALDHhigh SCC7 CSC-DC vaccinations after surgical resection of the subcutaneous SCC7 tumors. SCC7 subcutaneous tumors were surgically excised 21 days after inoculation as in A. Animals were then treated with different vaccines as indicated on day 22 and day 29, except for the “no tumor resection” group as a control. In addition, anti-PD-L1 (0.05 mg/mouse) was intraperitoneally injected on days 22 and 25, days 29 and 32, either alone or with the ALDHhigh-DC vaccine. D, administration of anti-PD-L1 significantly prolonged the survival of animals treated in C. Two experiments were independently performed.

Figure 1.

A, DCs pulsed with ALDHhigh SCC7 CSCs significantly inhibited tumor recurrence. Twenty-one days after inoculation of SCC7 cells, s.c, tumors were surgically removed and animals were treated with different vaccines as indicated on day 22, day 29, and day 36, except for the “no tumor resection” group as a control. Tumor volume (mean ± SEM) is shown. B, DCs pulsed with ALDHhigh SCC7 CSCs significantly prolonged the animal survival after surgical resection of the subcutaneous SCC7 tumors. Data are representative of three experiments independently performed. C, administration of anti-PD-L1 significantly inhibited tumor recurrence in animals treated with suboptima1 doses (2 vs. 3 in A) of ALDHhigh SCC7 CSC-DC vaccinations after surgical resection of the subcutaneous SCC7 tumors. SCC7 subcutaneous tumors were surgically excised 21 days after inoculation as in A. Animals were then treated with different vaccines as indicated on day 22 and day 29, except for the “no tumor resection” group as a control. In addition, anti-PD-L1 (0.05 mg/mouse) was intraperitoneally injected on days 22 and 25, days 29 and 32, either alone or with the ALDHhigh-DC vaccine. D, administration of anti-PD-L1 significantly prolonged the survival of animals treated in C. Two experiments were independently performed.

Close modal

One of the major recent advances in tumor immunotherapy has been the development of strategies to block the immunosuppressive components of the tumor microenvironment (22, 23). We next performed experiments where SCC7 subcutaneous tumors were surgically excised as in Fig. 1A, and animals were treated as indicated in Fig. 1C with or without anti-PD-L1 administration. SCC7 ALDHhigh-DC (CSC-DC) vaccination plus anti-PD-L1 administration significantly inhibited tumor relapse (Fig. 1C) and prolonged animal survival (Fig. 1D) compared with either treatment alone. These experiments clearly demonstrate that immunologically targeting CSCs, while simultaneously blocking PD-1/PD-L1–mediated immune suppression, has the potential to significantly enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies.

CSC-DC vaccination inhibited tumor growth and prevented spontaneous lung metastasis in D5 melanoma

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the CSC-DC vaccine in the setting of micrometastatic disease, we utilized the highly metastatic D5 mouse melanoma model. To test the efficacy of the CSC-DC vaccine in treating micrometastatic disease, it was administered 24 hours after inoculation of tumor cells. Syngeneic B6 mice were inoculated with 5,000 D5 melanoma cells subcutaneously followed by vaccination 24 hours later (day 1) with DCs pulsed with the ALDHhigh D5 CSCs (CSC-DC) cell lysate, ALDHlow D5 cell lysate (ALDHlow-DC), heterogeneous unsorted D5 cell lysate (H-DC), or with PBS, respectively. The treatment was repeated on day 8. As shown in Fig. 2A, no significant difference in primary tumor growth was observed among PBS, H-DC, or ALDHlow-DC–treated mice. However, administration of the CSC-DC vaccine treatment resulted in significant inhibition of tumor growth compared with controls (P < 0.02 vs. all other groups). The CSC-DC–treated mice also survived longer than controls (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that the treatment of subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice in the setting of minimal tumor with CSC-DC vaccination generated significant antitumor immunity, resulting in inhibited subcutaneous tumor growth and prolonged survival of the tumor-bearing hosts.

Figure 2.

In the minimal D5 tumor model, the ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival that was associated with prevented lung metastasis. A, the CSC-DC vaccination significantly inhibited subcutaneous tumor growth. Twenty-four hours after subcutaneous inoculation of D5 cells, animals were treated with different vaccines as indicated, and the treatment was repeated one week later. Tumor volumes (mean ± SEM) are shown. B, CSC-DC vaccine significantly prolonged the survival of s.c D5-bearing mice. C and D, CSC-DC vaccination significantly prevented the lung metastasis of the subcutaneously injected tumor. C, lung metastasis was verified by H&E staining. Representative graphs show the histologic alternation of the lung tissues. Lung tissue harvested from a normal B6 mouse served as control. Red arrows, tumor lesions in the lung tissues. D,P values comparing lung metastasis (n = 11) among groups treated as indicated. Data are representative of three independent experiments performed. E and F, representative flow cytometry data of one of the three experiments performed to show decreased PD-L1 expression on ALDHhigh cells (CSC; E) and ALDHlow cells (non-CSC; F) after ALDHhigh-DC vaccination. G, statistically, ALDHhigh-DC vaccination significantly (P < 0.005) reduced the PD-L1 expression on both ALDHhigh cells (CSC) and ALDHlow (non-CSC) cells.

Figure 2.

In the minimal D5 tumor model, the ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival that was associated with prevented lung metastasis. A, the CSC-DC vaccination significantly inhibited subcutaneous tumor growth. Twenty-four hours after subcutaneous inoculation of D5 cells, animals were treated with different vaccines as indicated, and the treatment was repeated one week later. Tumor volumes (mean ± SEM) are shown. B, CSC-DC vaccine significantly prolonged the survival of s.c D5-bearing mice. C and D, CSC-DC vaccination significantly prevented the lung metastasis of the subcutaneously injected tumor. C, lung metastasis was verified by H&E staining. Representative graphs show the histologic alternation of the lung tissues. Lung tissue harvested from a normal B6 mouse served as control. Red arrows, tumor lesions in the lung tissues. D,P values comparing lung metastasis (n = 11) among groups treated as indicated. Data are representative of three independent experiments performed. E and F, representative flow cytometry data of one of the three experiments performed to show decreased PD-L1 expression on ALDHhigh cells (CSC; E) and ALDHlow cells (non-CSC; F) after ALDHhigh-DC vaccination. G, statistically, ALDHhigh-DC vaccination significantly (P < 0.005) reduced the PD-L1 expression on both ALDHhigh cells (CSC) and ALDHlow (non-CSC) cells.

Close modal

To investigate the effect of these treatments on the development of lung metastases, we harvested the lungs at the end of the experiments and accessed lung metastases. Representative histology of the lungs is shown in Fig. 2C. Mice subjected to PBS treatment, H-DC, or ALDHlow-DC vaccine all displayed numerous large lung metastases. In contrast, there were significantly reduced lung metastases detected in the lungs harvested from ALDHhigh CSC-DC–vaccinated hosts (Fig. 2C). The ALDHhigh-DC vaccine significantly inhibited tumor metastasis in the lung compared with PBS, H-DC, and ALDHlow-DC vaccine treatments (P < 0.05, Fig. 2D). Only 2 of 11 total mice developed lung metastasis after ALDHhigh-DC vaccination, while 9 of 11 mice treated with PBS or ALDHlow-DC, and 8 of 11 mice treated with H-DC developed lung metastases (Fig. 2D). Together, these results indicated that CSC-DC vaccine significantly inhibited tumor growth and lung metastases, resulting in increased animal survival. In addition, as shown in Fig. 2E, after ALDHhigh-DC vaccination, PD-L1 expression on ALDHhigh cells (CSC) was decreased to 5.3% compared with PBS (17.2%), H-DC (8.3%), or ALDHlow-DC (11.4%) treatment. Similarly, PD-L1 expression on ALDHlow cells (non-CSC) was decreased after ALDHhigh-DC vaccination to 4.5% (Fig. 2F) compared with PBS (8.2%), H-DC (6.2%), or ALDHlow-DC (7.6%) treatment. Statistically, when the mean ± SE of the three experiments' data were compared (Fig. 2G), ALDHhigh-DC vaccination significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the PD-L1 expression on both ALDHhigh cells (CSC) and ALDHlow (non-CSC) cells.

CSC-DC vaccination significantly downregulated CCR10 expression on ALDHhigh CSCs

Chemokines play a significant role in tumor metastasis (24–26). We examined the expression of CCR10 on tumor cells from mice treated in the minimal disease setting, and compared its expression in ALDHhigh CSCs versus ALDHlow non-CSCs. CCR10 expression was accessed by flow cytometry in D5 tumors harvested from animals subjected to various vaccines (Fig. 3A and B). CSC-DC vaccination significantly decreased expression of CCR10 in unsorted bulk tumor cells (P < 0.01 vs. all other groups). With CSC-DC vaccination, the expression of CCR10 on D5 tumor cells was significantly decreased to approximately 3% compared with PBS treatment (>20%), or with H-DC and ALDHlow-DC vaccination (both around 15%; Fig. 3A and B). We then sorted ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells from freshly harvested D5 tumors subjected to vaccine therapy, and assessed their CCR10 expression. We found that the expression of CCR10 was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher on D5 ALDHhigh CSCs (>60%) than on ALDHlow non-CSCs (<20%; Fig. 3C and D, PBS groups). ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccination significantly decreased the expression of CCR10 on D5 ALDHhigh as well as on ALDHlow cells (Fig. 3C and D). Finally, using qRT-PCR, we found that mRNA for the corresponding chemokine ligands for CCR10 in the lung tissues, CCL27 and CCL28, were both significantly decreased after ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine treatment (P < 0.01 vs. all other groups; Fig. 3E). Collectively, these data suggest that CSC-DC vaccination may inhibit pulmonary metastasis of the local tumor by significantly downregulating the expression of CCR10 on primary tumor cells, particularly on the ALDHhigh CSCs in the primary tumor, as well as reducing the production of CCR10 ligands, CCL27 and CCL28, in the lung tissues.

Figure 3.

The expression of CCR10 was significantly downregulated on ALDHhigh D5 CSCs in animals subjected to ALDHhigh D5CSC-DC vaccine treatment. A, flow cytometry graphs of CCR10, which were generated using mixed D5 cells harvested from multiple animals in each treatment group as indicated. B, bar graph shows the P value with SE using the D5 cells harvested from each experiment group. Data are representative of two independently performed experiments. C, flow cytometry graphs of CCR10 expression on D5 ALDHhigh-CSCs versus ALDHlow-non-CSCs post treatment of the minimal tumor with PBS, ALDHlow-DC, H-DC, and ALDHhigh-DC, respectively. D,P values comparing CCR10 expression on D5 ALDHhigh-CSCs versus D5 ALDHlow-non-CSCs from animals treated as indicated. E, PCR analyses showed that the ALDHhigh-DC (CSC-DC) vaccine significantly reduced the mRNA levels of CCR10 ligands, for example, CCL27 and CCL28, in lung tissues harvested from D5-bearing host subjected to treatments in minimal disease.

Figure 3.

The expression of CCR10 was significantly downregulated on ALDHhigh D5 CSCs in animals subjected to ALDHhigh D5CSC-DC vaccine treatment. A, flow cytometry graphs of CCR10, which were generated using mixed D5 cells harvested from multiple animals in each treatment group as indicated. B, bar graph shows the P value with SE using the D5 cells harvested from each experiment group. Data are representative of two independently performed experiments. C, flow cytometry graphs of CCR10 expression on D5 ALDHhigh-CSCs versus ALDHlow-non-CSCs post treatment of the minimal tumor with PBS, ALDHlow-DC, H-DC, and ALDHhigh-DC, respectively. D,P values comparing CCR10 expression on D5 ALDHhigh-CSCs versus D5 ALDHlow-non-CSCs from animals treated as indicated. E, PCR analyses showed that the ALDHhigh-DC (CSC-DC) vaccine significantly reduced the mRNA levels of CCR10 ligands, for example, CCL27 and CCL28, in lung tissues harvested from D5-bearing host subjected to treatments in minimal disease.

Close modal

The role played by CCR10 in the metastasis of tumor cells was significantly blocked by Ccr10 siRNA inhibition

To substantiate the role for CCR10 and its ligands in tumor metastasis, we used Ccr10 siRNA to inhibit Ccr10 gene expression as described in Materials and Methods. To test the effect of Ccr10 siRNA on the inhibition of D5 cell migration in vitro, we carried out a chemotaxis assay.

As shown in Fig. 4A, Ccr10 siRNA–treated D5 cells demonstrated significantly (P < 0.001) less migration ability than nontreated D5 cells toward the CCL27 and CCL28 added to the bottom of the transwell at the concentrations as indicated. To test the effect of Ccr10 siRNA on the inhibition of ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cell migration in vivo, we compared the metastasis of nontreated ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells with that of Ccr10 siRNA–transferred ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells when 1 × 106 cells of each group were intravenously injected into the normal B6 mice. As expected, ALDHhigh D5 cells generated significantly (P = 0.03) more metastasis than ALDHlow D5 cells (Fig. 4B). Importantly, Ccr10 siRNA–treated ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells generated significantly less metastasis than nontreated ALDHlow (P = 0.0002) or ALDHhigh (P = 0.0003) D5 cells, respectively. These experiments strongly suggest that CCR10 plays an important role in the migration and therefore the metastasis of D5 tumor cells.

Figure 4.

Ccr10 siRNA significantly blocked the role played by CCR10 in tumor metastasis. A, the effect of Ccr10 siRNA on the inhibition of D5 cell migration in vitro in a chemotaxis assay. Data are representative of three chemotaxis assays independently performed. B, the effect of Ccr10 siRNA on the inhibition of metastasis of ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells. C, equal doses of Ccr10 siRNA and control siRNA were used to transfer unsorted D5 cells for various periods of time as indicated to inhibit Ccr10 expression. The data are expressed as the relative fold change. Relative fold changes of Ccr10 gene expression as shown in C represent the averages of three replicates for each group analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCt method. D, ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells showed significantly downregulated Ccr10 gene expression by Ccr10 siRNA treatment. Data shown represent the averages of three replicates for each group analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Figure 4.

Ccr10 siRNA significantly blocked the role played by CCR10 in tumor metastasis. A, the effect of Ccr10 siRNA on the inhibition of D5 cell migration in vitro in a chemotaxis assay. Data are representative of three chemotaxis assays independently performed. B, the effect of Ccr10 siRNA on the inhibition of metastasis of ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells. C, equal doses of Ccr10 siRNA and control siRNA were used to transfer unsorted D5 cells for various periods of time as indicated to inhibit Ccr10 expression. The data are expressed as the relative fold change. Relative fold changes of Ccr10 gene expression as shown in C represent the averages of three replicates for each group analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCt method. D, ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells showed significantly downregulated Ccr10 gene expression by Ccr10 siRNA treatment. Data shown represent the averages of three replicates for each group analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Close modal

To confirm the efficacy of Ccr10 siRNA in Ccr10 gene silencing, equal doses of Ccr10 siRNA and control siRNA were used to transfer unsorted D5 cells for various time periods, for example, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Figure 4C shows that transfer of unsorted D5 cells for 48 hours begins to demonstrate significantly (P = 0.0005) silenced Ccr10 gene. We therefore transferred unsorted D5 cells for 48 hours in Fig. 4A as well as for ALDHhigh and ALDHlow D5 cells in Fig. 4B. In addition, Fig. 4D revealed that Ccr10 gene expression in ALDHhigh D5 cells is higher (P < 0.0001) than that in ALDHlow D5 cells. Importantly, Ccr10 siRNA–treated ALDHlow and ALDHhigh D5 cells showed significantly downregulated Ccr10 gene expression compared with nontreated ALDHlow (P < 0.05) and ALDHhigh (P < 0.05) D5 cells, respectively.

CSC-DC vaccination conferred host CSC–specific antibody responses

To provide experimental evidence that CSC-DC vaccination induces specific anti-CSC immunity, we collected the spleens after the full treatment course in the minimal D5 tumor model, purified splenic B cells, and activated them in vitro with LPS and anti-CD40. We then accessed the specificity of CSC-DC vaccine–primed antibody by binding assays of the B-cell culture supernatants to ALDHhigh D5 CSCs versus ALDHlow D5 non-CSCs, respectively. Immune supernatants produced by B cells from mice that received ALDHhigh-DC treatment bound to ALDHhigh D5 CSCs (60.8%; Fig. 5A) much more effectively than the immune supernatants collected from PBS-treated (12.3%), H-DC vaccinated (29.8%), or ALDHlow-DC–treated (15.7%) mice. In contrast, the immune supernatants produced by B cells harvested from H-DC or ALDHlow-DC–vaccinated mice bound to the ALDHlow non-CSCs (45.8% and 50.2%, respectively) significantly more than the immune supernatants produced by B cells harvested from the CSC-DC–vaccinated mice (6.8%) or from PBS-treated controls (18.8%). Figure 5B shows the results of multiple binding assays, indicating that the immune supernatants produced by CSC-DC vaccine–primed B cells bound to the ALDHhigh D5 CSCs much more effectively (P < 0.01 vs. all other groups). In contrast, the ALDHlow-DC vaccine–primed immune supernatants bound to the ALDHlow non-CSCs similar to the binding by H-DC vaccine–primed immune supernatants, but significantly more than the binding of PBS or CSC-DC vaccine–primed immune supernatants (Fig. 5C), demonstrating CSC-DC vaccine induced CSC-specific humoral immunity.

Figure 5.

Antibody produced by D5 CSC-DC vaccine–primed B cells bound and killed D5 CSCs specifically. A, flow cytometry histograms using culture supernatant of mixed B cells from each treatment group. B, statistical analysis of the binding to ALDHhigh CSCs by immune supernatants primed by PBS, H-DC, ALDHlow-DC, or ALDHhigh-DC, respectively. C, statistical analysis of the binding to ALDHlow D5 cells by immune supernatants primed as indicated. Binding experiments were repeated three times. D, CSC-DC vaccine–primed antibody selectively targeted CSCs via CDC. A total of 105 viable ALDHhigh or ALDHlow D5 cells were incubated with the culture immune supernatants of purified and activated spleen B cells collected from the animals subjected to treatments as indicated. The cells were then incubated with rabbit complement for 1 hour. The Trypan blue staining was used to assess the cell lysis, which was expressed as: % viable cells = the number of viable cells after immune supernatant and complement incubation/105. Each experiment was repeated once.

Figure 5.

Antibody produced by D5 CSC-DC vaccine–primed B cells bound and killed D5 CSCs specifically. A, flow cytometry histograms using culture supernatant of mixed B cells from each treatment group. B, statistical analysis of the binding to ALDHhigh CSCs by immune supernatants primed by PBS, H-DC, ALDHlow-DC, or ALDHhigh-DC, respectively. C, statistical analysis of the binding to ALDHlow D5 cells by immune supernatants primed as indicated. Binding experiments were repeated three times. D, CSC-DC vaccine–primed antibody selectively targeted CSCs via CDC. A total of 105 viable ALDHhigh or ALDHlow D5 cells were incubated with the culture immune supernatants of purified and activated spleen B cells collected from the animals subjected to treatments as indicated. The cells were then incubated with rabbit complement for 1 hour. The Trypan blue staining was used to assess the cell lysis, which was expressed as: % viable cells = the number of viable cells after immune supernatant and complement incubation/105. Each experiment was repeated once.

Close modal

To examine the functional consequence of CSC-specific antibody induced by CSC-DC vaccination, we performed antibody and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays (Fig. 5D). ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine–primed immune supernatant killed ALDHhigh D5 CSCs significantly more than the immune supernatants collected from other groups (P < 0.001 vs. all other groups). In contrast, the immune supernatant harvested from H-DC or ALDHlow non-CSC vaccine–treated host resulted in significant ALDHlow D5 cell lysis, while the immune supernatant from the ALDHhigh CSC-DC–vaccinated hosts produced minimal lysis of the ALDHlow targets. Together, these data support the conclusion that ALDHhigh D5 CSC-DC vaccine confers significant host anti-CSC humoral immunity by producing D5 CSC–specific antibodies that specifically bind and kill D5 CSCs.

CSC-DC vaccination conferred host CSC–specific CTL function

We next examined the ability of CSC-DC vaccination to generate host CSC–specific CTL activity. As shown in Fig. 5, we collected the spleens at the end of the treatment in the minimal D5 tumor model, purified splenic T cells, and activated them in vitro with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 followed by expansion in IL2. This activation procedure generates cytotoxic T cells (>95 CD3 cells; ref. 15). We then measured the CTL activity of these T cells on ALDHhigh D5 CSCs versus ALDHlow D5 non-CSCs, respectively. D5 ALDHhigh-DC–primed CTLs mediated significantly greater cytotoxicity in D5 ALDHhigh CSCs at all effector to target (E:T) ratios compared with the CTLs generated from PBS, H-DC, or ALDHlow DC–primed CTLs (P < 0.05; Fig. 6A). In contrast, CTLs generated from splenocytes of mice subjected to ALDHlow DC and H-DC vaccination selectively killed ALDHlow D5 cells (Fig. 6B). These experiments indicate that CSC-DC vaccination conferred host CTL reactivity as well as humoral responses against CSCs in the treatment of minimal tumor disease.

Figure 6.

T cells harvested from D5 ALDHhigh DC–vaccinated animals selectively and significantly killed the ALDHhigh D5 cells. CTLs were generated as described in Materials and Methods from the spleens harvested from the animals subjected to PBS, H-DC, ALDHlow-DC, or ALDHhigh-DC vaccination, respectively. Cytotoxicity mediated by CTLs was measured by LDH release assay. A, ALDHhigh-DC (CSC-DC)–primed CTLs selectively and significantly killed the ALDHhigh D5 CSCs (P < 0.05 compared with all other groups). B, CTLs generated from the splenocytes of mice vaccinated with ALDHlow-DC or H-DC killed ALDHlow D5 cells specifically.

Figure 6.

T cells harvested from D5 ALDHhigh DC–vaccinated animals selectively and significantly killed the ALDHhigh D5 cells. CTLs were generated as described in Materials and Methods from the spleens harvested from the animals subjected to PBS, H-DC, ALDHlow-DC, or ALDHhigh-DC vaccination, respectively. Cytotoxicity mediated by CTLs was measured by LDH release assay. A, ALDHhigh-DC (CSC-DC)–primed CTLs selectively and significantly killed the ALDHhigh D5 CSCs (P < 0.05 compared with all other groups). B, CTLs generated from the splenocytes of mice vaccinated with ALDHlow-DC or H-DC killed ALDHlow D5 cells specifically.

Close modal

CSC-DC vaccination significantly reduced the population of ALDHhigh CSCs in vivo

As described above, ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccination induced significant host cellular and humoral immune responses against CSCs. To confirm that CSCs are effectively targeted by CSC-induced immunity, we determined the effect of CSC-DC vaccination on the proportion of ALDHhigh CSC in vivo. Assessment of the ALDHhigh population was performed by flow cytometry using the Aldefluor assays as described previously (15). We mixed the tumor cells from mice of each experimental group, and generated representative flow cytometric graphs to demonstrate the ALDHhigh populations in each group (Fig. 7A). Subcutaneous tumors harvested from CSC-DC–treated mice contained only 1.7% ALDHhigh cells, which was significantly less than that present in the subcutaneous tumors subjected to PBS (13.4%), H-DC (7.5%), or ALDHlow-DC (8.3%) treatments. As shown in Fig. 7B, CSC-DC vaccination significantly reduced the percentage of ALDHhigh populations compared with PBS, H-DC, or ALDHlow-DC treatments (P = 0.0002, 0.0002, and 0.0029, respectively) in this tumor model. Together, these studies demonstrate that in the D5 minimal disease model, CSC-DC vaccine elicits both humoral and cellular immune responses reducing the proportion of CSC, resulting in decreased tumor growth, lung metastases, and prolonged survival.

Figure 7.

The ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine treatment significantly decreased the percentage of ALDHhigh cells in the subcutaneous minimal residual tumors. A, representative flow cytometry showing the percentage of ALDHhigh cells in the residual tumor after different treatment as indicated. B, the bar graph shows the mean ± SE and P values using multiple animals from each group.

Figure 7.

The ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine treatment significantly decreased the percentage of ALDHhigh cells in the subcutaneous minimal residual tumors. A, representative flow cytometry showing the percentage of ALDHhigh cells in the residual tumor after different treatment as indicated. B, the bar graph shows the mean ± SE and P values using multiple animals from each group.

Close modal

Utilizing two tumor models, we demonstrate the efficacy of a CSC-DC vaccine when used to treat minimal disease in the adjuvant setting. Several reports have described the generation of CSC-specific CD8 T effector cells in vitro (27–30); the killing of CSCs via nonspecific immune effector cells (31–34) as well as by oncolytic viruses (35) and antibodies (36). We previously reported therapeutic efficacy of CSC-DC vaccination in the treatment of established tumors after localized radiotherapy (17). However, as CSCs may be responsible for local tumor recurrence after resection (37) as well as mediating tumor metastasis (38–41), CSC-targeted therapeutics may have their greatest utility when they are utilized in the adjuvant-minimal disease setting. We examined this utilizing two different mouse tumor models.

The SCC7 squamous carcinoma model was designed to determine the efficacy of CSC-DC vaccination after surgical removal of the primary tumor. This model is clinically relevant, as in squamous carcinoma of the head and neck resection of bulky SCC primary tumors has been associated with a high rate of local tumor recurrence associated with significant morbidity and mortality (20, 21). Using the murine SCC7 tumor model, we found that the SCC7 ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine significantly inhibited tumor recurrence and prolonged animal survival following surgical resection compared with SCC7 H-DC or SCC7 ALDHlow-DC vaccinations. Simultaneous administration of an anti-PD-L1 mAb significantly enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of SCC7 CSC-DC vaccine in the adjuvant setting.

The second model involved treatment of D5 murine melanoma in an early disease setting 24 hours after tumor inoculation. While the H-DC vaccination and the ALDHlow-DC had minimal effects on the local tumor growth and only modestly prolonged survival, the ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine was significantly more effective in inhibiting tumor growth, resulting in prolonged survival.

To date, the mechanisms that are involved in CSC-DC vaccine–mediated therapeutic efficacy have not been fully defined, and limited experimental evidence was provided for direct targeting of CSCs by CSC-DC vaccine–induced anti-CSC immunity. CSCs are responsible for tumor metastasis and progression (38–41). In this study, we found that the therapeutic efficacy of CSC-DC vaccine was associated with significantly inhibited metastasis of the subcutaneous tumor to the lung. A number of studies have suggested that tumor cell metastasis is determined by the expression level of chemokine receptors on the malignant tumor cells and the expression of corresponding chemokine ligands in the target organs (24–26, 42–46).

We demonstrated high levels of CCR10 (>20%) in tumor cells isolated from control mice. CSC-DC vaccination significantly reduced the expression of CCR10 to 3%. More importantly, we found that the expression of CCR10 was significantly higher on D5 ALDHhigh CSCs (>60%) than on ALDHlow non-CSCs (<20%), and ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine significantly decreased the expression of CCR10 on D5 ALDHhigh cells to <15%. In a group of experiments, we found that Ccr10 siRNA treatment to inhibit Ccr10 gene expression significantly blocked tumor cell migration in vitro and metastasis in vivo. In addition, ligands for CCR10, including CCL27 and CCL28, were significantly decreased in the lung tissues harvested from the animals treated with CSC-DC vaccination. These data suggest that decreased CCR10, CCL27, and CCL28 may play an important role in CSC-DC vaccination–induced inhibition of tumor metastasis. Chemokine receptors can activate downstream effectors, such as MAPKs, by complex mechanisms (47). The molecular and biochemical signaling pathways by which CSC-DC vaccination induces downregulation of CCR10, CCL27, and CCL28 remain to be identified.

We examined the ability of CSC-DC vaccines to elicit CSC-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Using splenocytes collected from the treated mice, we generated CTLs. D5 ALDHhigh-DC–primed CTLs significantly killed the D5 ALDHhigh CSCs compared with the CTLs generated from PBS, H-DC, or ALDHlow DC–primed CTLs. In contrast, CTLs generated from splenocytes of mice subjected to ALDHlow DC and H-DC vaccination selectively killed ALDHlow D5 cells. These experiments indicate that CSC-DC vaccination confers host CTL activity that specifically target CSCs. In addition, the ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine–primed host B cells produced antibody specifically bound to ALDHhigh CSCs (>60%), which was significantly higher than the binding by antibodies produced PBS, H-DC, or ALDHlow-DC–primed B cells (10%–30%). In contrast, H-DC or ALDHlow-DC vaccine–primed B cells produced antibody preferentially bound to ALDHlow D5 cells (45%–50%), which was significantly higher than the binding by antibodies produced by PBS or ALDHhigh CSC-DC vaccine–primed B cells (18% and 6%, respectively). The immunologic consequence of antibody binding of the CSCs was the lysis of the CSCs in the presence of complement, demonstrating that CSC-DC vaccines elicit significant humoral immune responses against CSCs as well as CSC-specific cellular immune responses. While we demonstrated that antibodies and CTLs were induced against CSCs, the identity of any recognized antigens has yet to be elucidated. Identification of CSC antigen(s) represents an active research focus in our laboratory and warrants further investigation.

The induction of cytotoxic T cells to CSCs has been observed in two different animal histologies using the CSC lysate vaccine both in our previous protection study (15) and in this therapeutic study. To date, we have not observed immune tolerance in our model system of CSC-DC vaccination. However, an immune adjuvant may enhance the induction of a tumor lysate–DC vaccine. We previously reported that the use of a second signal agent such as anti-4-1BB mAb augmented the antitumor efficacy of DC-based vaccines (48). We did not use this approach in this report to focus on the use of CSC-DC vaccines by themselves. Nevertheless, the use of adjuvant agents may enhance T, B-cell activation as a method to improve CSC-DC vaccine–induced anti-CSC immunity.

Our experiments provide direct evidence that CSC-DC vaccine can induce anti-CSC immunity by targeting CSCs. As a result, ALDHhigh CSC populations in the residual tumor of the mice subjected to CSC-DC vaccine were significantly decreased to <2% compared with the PBS-treated control (∼15%), and was significantly lower than those of the animals subjected to H-DC or ALDHlow-DC treatment (7%–9%). In our previous publications, we have demonstrated that a reduction in ALDH expression is strongly associated with reduction in tumor-initiating capacity as accessed by extreme limiting dilution analysis (49, 50). The values of reduction of ALDH associated with treatments shown in this study are highly statistically significant. Future studies accessing the ability of CSC-DC vaccines to reduce tumor-initiating capacity of treated tumor cells transplanted into secondary animals are warranted. We propose that the significant reduction of the residual CSCs after CSC-DC immunotherapy is due to CSC-DC vaccine-induced cellular and humoral targeting of CSCs. Together, these studies suggest the potential clinical efficacy of utilizing CSC-DC vaccines in the adjuvant/early tumor setting, a strategy that may be augmented by PD-l/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade.

R.E. Hollingsworth is a senior director, oncology and has ownership interest (including patents) in MedImmune. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design: L. Lu, A.E. Chang, J.S. Moyer, M.E. Prince, S. Huang, Q. Li

Development of methodology: Y. Hu, L. Lu, Y. Xia, A.E. Chang, J.S. Moyer, F. Dai, Y. Bao, Q. Li

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): Y. Hu, L. Lu, X. Chen, R.E. Hollingsworth, J.H. Owen, M.E. Prince, J. Whitfield, M.S. Wicha

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): Y. Hu, L. Lu, Y. Xia, X. Chen, A.E. Chang, J.S. Moyer, F. Dai, Y. Bao, J. Whitfield

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: Y. Hu, X. Chen, A.E. Chang, E. Hurt, J.S. Moyer, M.E. Prince, J. Whitfield, S. Huang, M.S. Wicha, Q. Li

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): J.S. Moyer, Y. Bao, J. Xia, S. Huang, Q. Li

Study supervision: E. Hurt, M.E. Prince, S. Huang, Q. Li

We thank Jill Granger for valuable assistance in editing the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Elsa U. Pardee Foundation, partially supported by the Gillson Longenbaugh Foundation and the University of Michigan MICHR Grant UL1TR000433, as well as the National Science Fund of China (81072170 and 81202093) and NCI research grant 1R-35CA 197585 (M.S. Wicha).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Demicheli
R
,
Retsky
MW
,
Hrushesky
WJ
,
Baum
M
,
Gukas
ID
. 
The effects of surgery on tumor growth: a century of investigations
.
Ann Oncol
2008
;
19
:
1821
8
.
2.
Mueller
JL
,
Fu
HL
,
Mito
JK
,
Whitley
MJ
,
Chitalia
R
,
Erkanli
A
, et al
A quantitative microscopic approach to predict local recurrence based on in vivo intraoperative imaging of sarcoma tumor margins
.
Int J Cancer
2015
;
137
:
2403
12
.
3.
Acasigua
GA
,
Warner
KA
,
Nor
F
,
Helman
J
,
Pearson
AT
,
Fossati
AC
, et al
BH3-mimetic small molecule inhibits the growth and recurrence of adenoid cystic carcinoma
.
Oral Oncol
2015
;
51
:
839
47
.
4.
Tham
M
,
Khoo
K
,
Yeo
KP
,
Kato
M
,
Prevost-Blondel
A
,
Angeli
V
, et al
Macrophage depletion reduces postsurgical tumor recurrence and metastatic growth in a spontaneous murine model of melanoma
.
Oncotarget
2015
;
6
:
22857
68
.
5.
Hofer
SO
,
Molema
G
,
Hermens
RA
,
Wanebo
HJ
,
Reichner
JS
,
Hoekstra
HJ
. 
The effect of surgical wounding on tumour development
.
Eur J Surg Oncol
1999
;
25
:
231
43
.
6.
Miwa
S
,
De Magalhaes
N
,
Toneri
M
,
Zhang
Y
,
Cao
W
,
Bouvet
M
, et al
Fluorescence-guided surgery of human prostate cancer experimental bone metastasis in nude mice using anti-CEA DyLight 650 for tumor illumination
.
J Orthop Res
2016
;
34
:
559
65
.
7.
Jordan
CT
,
Guzman
ML
,
Noble
M
. 
Cancer stem cells
.
N Engl J Med
2006
;
355
:
1253
61
.
8.
O'Brien
CA
,
Kreso
A
,
Jamieson
CH
. 
Cancer stem cells and self-renewal
.
Clin Cancer Res
2010
;
16
:
3113
20
.
9.
Yue
L
,
Huang
ZM
,
Fong
S
,
Leong
S
,
Jakowatz
JG
,
Charruyer-Reinwald
A
, et al
Targeting ALDH1 to decrease tumorigenicity, growth and metastasis of human melanoma
.
Melanoma Res
2015
;
25
:
138
48
.
10.
Ginestier
C
,
Hur
MH
,
Charafe-Jauffret
E
,
Monville
F
,
Dutcher
J
,
Brown
M
, et al
ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome
.
Cell Stem Cell
2007
;
1
:
555
67
.
11.
Clay
MR
,
Tabor
M
,
Owen
JH
,
Carey
TE
,
Bradford
CR
,
Wolf
GT
, et al
Single-marker identification of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cancer stem cells with aldehyde dehydrogenase
.
Head Neck
2010
;
32
:
1195
201
.
12.
Luo
Y
,
Dallaglio
K
,
Chen
Y
,
Robinson
WA
,
Robinson
SE
,
McCarter
MD
, et al
ALDH1A isozymes are markers of human melanoma stem cells and potential therapeutic targets
.
Stem Cells
2012
;
30
:
2100
13
.
13.
Boonyaratanakornkit
JB
,
Yue
L
,
Strachan
LR
,
Scalapino
KJ
,
LeBoit
PE
,
Lu
Y
, et al
Selection of tumorigenic melanoma cells using ALDH
.
J Invest Dermatol
2010
;
130
:
2799
808
.
14.
Le Magnen
C
,
Bubendorf
L
,
Rentsch
CA
,
Mengus
C
,
Gsponer
J
,
Zellweger
T
, et al
Characterization and clinical relevance of ALDHbright populations in prostate cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2013
;
19
:
5361
71
.
15.
Ning
N
,
Pan
Q
,
Zheng
F
,
Teitz-Tennenbaum
S
,
Egenti
M
,
Yet
J
, et al
Cancer stem cell vaccination confers significant antitumor immunity
.
Cancer Res
2012
;
72
:
1853
64
.
16.
Yasuda
K
,
Torigoe
T
,
Morita
R
,
Kuroda
T
,
Takahashi
A
,
Matsuzaki
J
, et al
Ovarian cancer stem cells are enriched in side population and aldehyde dehydrogenase bright overlapping population
.
PLoS One
2013
;
8
:
e68187
.
17.
Lu
L
,
Tao
H
,
Chang
AE
,
Hu
Y
,
Shu
G
,
Chen
Q
, et al
Cancer stem cell vaccine inhibits metastases of primary tumors and induces humoral immune responses against cancer stem cells
.
Oncoimmunology
2015
;
4
:
e990767
.
18.
Teitz-Tennenbaum
S
,
Li
Q
,
Rynkiewicz
S
,
Ito
F
,
Davis
MA
,
McGinn
CJ
, et al
Radiotherapy potentiates the therapeutic efficacy of intratumoral dendritic cell administration
.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
8466
75
.
19.
Wang
W
,
Lv
L
,
Pan
K
,
Zhang
Y
,
Zhao
JJ
,
Chen
JG
, et al
Reduced expression of transcription factor AP-2alpha is associated with gastric adenocarcinoma prognosis
.
PLoS One
2011
;
6
:
e24897
.
20.
Tupchong
L
,
Scott
CB
,
Blitzer
PH
,
Marcial
VA
,
Lowry
LD
,
Jacobs
JR
, et al
Randomized study of preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy in advanced head and neck carcinoma: long-term follow-up of RTOG study 73-03
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1991
;
20
:
21
8
.
21.
Vokes
EE
,
Weichselbaum
RR
,
Lippman
SM
,
Hong
WK
. 
Head and neck cancer
.
N Engl J Med
1993
;
328
:
184
94
.
22.
Lyford-Pike
S
,
Peng
S
,
Young
GD
,
Taube
JM
,
Westra
WH
,
Akpeng
B
, et al
Evidence for a role of the PD-1:PD-L1 pathway in immune resistance of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
.
Cancer Res
2013
;
73
:
1733
41
.
23.
Brahmer
JR
,
Tykodi
SS
,
Chow
LQ
,
Hwu
WJ
,
Topalian
SL
,
Hwu
P
, et al
Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
366
:
2455
65
.
24.
Ben-Baruch
A
. 
Organ selectivity in metastasis: regulation by chemokines and their receptors
.
Clin Exp Metastasis
2008
;
25
:
345
56
.
25.
Payne
AS
,
Cornelius
LA
. 
The role of chemokines in melanoma tumor growth and metastasis
.
J Invest Dermatol
2002
;
118
:
915
22
.
26.
Muller
A
,
Homey
B
,
Soto
H
,
Ge
N
,
Catron
D
,
Buchanan
ME
, et al
Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis
.
Nature
2001
;
410
:
50
6
.
27.
Brown
CE
,
Starr
R
,
Martinez
C
,
Aguilar
B
,
D'Apuzzo
M
,
Todorov
I
, et al
Recognition and killing of brain tumor stem-like initiating cells by CD8+ cytolytic T cells
.
Cancer Res
2009
;
69
:
8886
93
.
28.
Jachetti
E
,
Mazzoleni
S
,
Grioni
M
,
Ricupito
A
,
Brambillasca
C
,
Generoso
L
, et al
Prostate cancer stem cells are targets of both innate and adaptive immunity and elicit tumor-specific immune responses
.
Oncoimmunology
2013
;
2
:
e24520
.
29.
Liao
T
,
Kaufmann
AM
,
Qian
X
,
Sangvatanakul
V
,
Chen
C
,
Kube
T
, et al
Susceptibility to cytotoxic T cell lysis of cancer stem cells derived from cervical and head and neck tumor cell lines
.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
2013
;
139
:
159
70
.
30.
Visus
C
,
Wang
Y
,
Lozano-Leon
A
,
Ferris
RL
,
Silver
S
,
Szczepanski
MJ
, et al
Targeting ALDH(bright) human carcinoma-initiating cells with ALDH1A1-specific CD8(+) T cells
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
6174
84
.
31.
Castriconi
R
,
Daga
A
,
Dondero
A
,
Zona
G
,
Poliani
PL
,
Melotti
A
, et al
NK cells recognize and kill human glioblastoma cells with stem cell-like properties
.
J Immunol
2009
;
182
:
3530
9
.
32.
Contag
CH
,
Sikorski
R
,
Negrin
RS
,
Schmidt
T
,
Fan
AC
,
Bachireddy
P
, et al
Definition of an enhanced immune cell therapy in mice that can target stem-like lymphoma cells
.
Cancer Res
2010
;
70
:
9837
45
.
33.
Tallerico
R
,
Todaro
M
,
Di Franco
S
,
Maccalli
C
,
Garofalo
C
,
Sottile
R
, et al
Human NK cells selective targeting of colon cancer-initiating cells: a role for natural cytotoxicity receptors and MHC class I molecules
.
J Immunol
2013
;
190
:
2381
90
.
34.
Todaro
M
,
D'Asaro
M
,
Caccamo
N
,
Iovino
F
,
Francipane
MG
,
Meraviglia
S
, et al
Efficient killing of human colon cancer stem cells by gammadelta T lymphocytes
.
J Immunol
2009
;
182
:
7287
96
.
35.
Bach
P
,
Abel
T
,
Hoffmann
C
,
Gal
Z
,
Braun
G
,
Voelker
I
, et al
Specific elimination of CD133+ tumor cells with targeted oncolytic measles virus
.
Cancer Res
2013
;
73
:
865
74
.
36.
Skubitz
AP
,
Taras
EP
,
Boylan
KL
,
Waldron
NN
,
Oh
S
,
Panoskaltsis-Mortari
A
, et al
Targeting CD133 in an in vivo ovarian cancer model reduces ovarian cancer progression
.
Gynecol Oncol
2013
;
130
:
579
87
.
37.
Choi
GH
,
Kim
GI
,
Yoo
JE
,
Na
DC
,
Han
DH
,
Roh
YH
, et al
Increased expression of circulating cancer stem cell markers during the perioperative period predicts early recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
.
Ann Surg Oncol
2015
;
22
Suppl 3
:
1444
52
.
38.
Geiger
TR
,
Peeper
DS
. 
Metastasis mechanisms
.
Biochim Biophys Acta
2009
;
1796
:
293
308
.
39.
Chen
K
,
Huang
YH
,
Chen
JL
. 
Understanding and targeting cancer stem cells: therapeutic implications and challenges
.
Acta Pharmacol Sin
2013
;
34
:
732
40
.
40.
Enderling
H
,
Hlatky
L
,
Hahnfeldt
P
. 
Cancer stem cells: a minor cancer subpopulation that redefines global cancer features
.
Front Oncol
2013
;
3
:
76
.
41.
Schatton
T
,
Frank
MH
. 
Cancer stem cells and human malignant melanoma
.
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res
2008
;
21
:
39
55
.
42.
Ben-Baruch
A
. 
Site-specific metastasis formation: chemokines as regulators of tumor cell adhesion, motility and invasion
.
Cell Adh Migr
2009
;
3
:
328
33
.
43.
Dobner
BC
,
Riechardt
AI
,
Joussen
AM
,
Englert
S
,
Bechrakis
NE
. 
Expression of haematogenous and lymphogenous chemokine receptors and their ligands on uveal melanoma in association with liver metastasis
.
Acta Ophthalmol
2012
;
90
:
e638
44
.
44.
Murakami
T
,
Cardones
AR
,
Hwang
ST
. 
Chemokine receptors and melanoma metastasis
.
J Dermatol Sci
2004
;
36
:
71
8
.
45.
Kai
H
,
Kadono
T
,
Kakinuma
T
,
Tomita
M
,
Ohmatsu
H
,
Asano
Y
, et al
CCR10 and CCL27 are overexpressed in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
.
Pathol Res Pract
2011
;
207
:
43
8
.
46.
Simonetti
O
,
Goteri
G
,
Lucarini
G
,
Filosa
A
,
Pieramici
T
,
Rubini
C
, et al
Potential role of CCL27 and CCR10 expression in melanoma progression and immune escape
.
Eur J Cancer
2006
;
42
:
1181
7
.
47.
Salazar
N
,
Castellan
M
,
Shirodkar
SS
,
Lokeshwar
BL
. 
Chemokines and chemokine receptors as promoters of prostate cancer growth and progression
.
Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr
2013
;
23
:
77
91
.
48.
Ito
F
,
Li
Q
,
Shreiner
AB
,
Okuyama
R
,
Jure-Kunkel
MN
,
Teitz-Tennenbaum
S
, et al
Anti-CD137 monoclonal antibody administration augments the antitumor efficacy of dendritic cell-based vaccines
.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
8411
9
.
49.
Ke
J
,
Zhao
Z
,
Hong
SH
,
Bai
S
,
He
Z
,
Malik
F
, et al
Role of microRNA221 in regulating normal mammary epithelial hierarchy and breast cancer stem-like cells
.
Oncotarget
2015
;
6
:
3709
21
.
50.
D'Angelo
RC
,
Ouzounova
M
,
Davis
A
,
Choi
D
,
Tchuenkam
SM
,
Kim
G
, et al
Notch reporter activity in breast cancer cell lines identifies a subset of cells with stem cell activity
.
Mol Cancer Ther
2015
;
14
:
779
87
.