The increased proteolytic activity of membrane-bound and secreted proteases on the surface of cancer cells and in the transformed stroma is a common characteristic of aggressive metastatic prostate cancer. We describe here the development of an active site-specific probe for detecting a secreted peritumoral protease expressed by cancer cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment. Using a human fragment antigen-binding phage display library, we identified a human antibody termed U33 that selectively inhibited the active form of the protease urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA, PLAU). In the full-length immunoglobulin form, U33 IgG labeled with near-infrared fluorophores or radionuclides allowed us to noninvasively detect active uPA in prostate cancer xenograft models using optical and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging modalities. U33 IgG labeled with 111In had a remarkable tumor uptake of 43.2% injected dose per gram (%ID/g) 72 hours after tail vein injection of the radiolabeled probe in subcutaneous xenografts. In addition, U33 was able to image active uPA in small soft-tissue and osseous metastatic lesions using a cardiac dissemination prostate cancer model that recapitulated metastatic human cancer. The favorable imaging properties were the direct result of U33 IgG internalization through an uPA receptor–mediated mechanism in which U33 mimicked the function of the endogenous inhibitor of uPA to gain entry into the cancer cell. Overall, our imaging probe targets a prostate cancer–associated protease, through a unique mechanism, allowing for the noninvasive preclinical imaging of prostate cancer lesions. Cancer Res; 75(7); 1225–35. ©2015 AACR.

Prostate cancer afflicts men in the western world at rates greater than any other malignancy, resulting in the deaths of approximately 30,000 men annually (1). Androgen ablation therapy is an effective treatment for men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Despite high initial response rates, a majority of men undergo androgen ablation relapse, leading to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC; ref. 2). Recent drug approvals by the FDA have demonstrated the impact that novel therapies can have on improving the quality and quantity of life for men with CRPC (3). Men with metastatic CRPC, however, are still likely to die from this disease and therefore, better therapies are needed. The development of novel therapies and the efficient use of established therapies are hindered by poor measures of response. Sensitive noninvasive imaging probes that identify cancerous lesions and measure cancer cell viability posttherapy would allow physicians to rapidly assess treatment efficacy and provide personalized care for men suffering from CRPC.

The ability to accurately image metastatic prostate cancer in soft tissue and bone remains an unmet clinical need. Modalities such as CT and MRI require large anatomic changes to be effective and provide limited information regarding the underlying tumor physiology (4). Dynamic hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI has been used to characterize tumor metabolism in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer, but it is not yet available for imaging metastases (5). Radionuclide bone scans, which measure bone remodeling, are common for evaluating metastatic cancer and therapeutic response. However, false-positives are common with bone scans because remodeling can occur from preexisting bone trauma, inflammation, and arthritis (6). The FDA-approved metabolic imaging tracer, 18F-fluorodexoyglucose, has met with limited success imaging prostate cancer because of the changing metabolic signatures at different stages of the disease (7). Other metabolic agents, including 11C-choline, 18F-fluorocholine, 11C-acetate, 11C-methionine, 18F-1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-ß-L-arabinofuranosyl)-5-methyluracil; FMAU), 1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-FACBC), and 18F-fluorothymidine, for measuring membrane synthesis, fatty acid transport, amino acid transport/protein synthesis, and proliferation, respectively, continue to be investigated (8, 9). The lack of an identifiable metabolic phenotype has led to the selective targeting of proteins overexpressed by prostate cancer. One such example is the FDA-approved ProstaScint, a murine antibody for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging that binds the metalloprotease prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA; ref. 10). ProstaScint recognizes an intracellular epitope of PSMA allowing the antibody to only image cells that are dead or undergoing necrosis. The resulting scans are of poor quality and limited to lymph node staging (11). Next-generation antibodies and small molecules labeled with PET and SPECT isotopes targeting the extracellular PSMA domain have shown promise in early human trials (12, 13).

The plasminogen activation system (PAS) is an attractive target for a biomarker-based imaging strategy for CRPC. Overexpression of the PAS—which consists of the serine protease urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), the uPA receptor, uPAR, and uPA inhibitor, PAI-1,—has been documented in primary and metastatic prostate cancer (14–16). Central to the role of the PAS in prostate cancer is the proteolytic activity of uPA. Importantly, uPA activity has been implicated in the formation of osteoblastic bone lesions and in prostate cancer with increased metastatic potential (14, 16, 17). Enzymatically active uPA has been isolated and characterized in CRPC bone metastases and in primary prostate cancer tumors (18). Upon secretion by cancer cells, uPA exists as inactive pro-uPA that is converted to its active form by proteases in the pericellular milieu. uPA binding to uPAR results in the accelerated conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. Plasmin can then directly cleave basement membrane proteins, or activate other proteases, leading to dissolution of the extracellular membrane. Inhibition of active uPA by PAI-1 results in the internalization of the uPA–uPAR–PAI-1 complex. Studies have shown that PAI-1, independent of uPA, functions as a signaling molecule by interacting with cell-surface receptors (19). PAI-1 can also be inactivated by other prostate cancer–associated proteases, such as human kallikrein 2 (20). These studies suggest that little functional PAI-1 exists to inactivate the PAS, resulting in high levels of active uPA in prostate cancer.

Several groups have investigated uPA as a prostate cancer biomarker in the serum and by immunohistochemical analysis of diseased tissue. Circulating levels of uPA in the serum of prostate cancer patients have been found to directly correlate with cancer stage and metastasis (21, 22). From studies using prostate cancer tissue microarrays, uPA was found to be ubiquitously expressed in organ-confined and metastatic cancer (23, 24). In addition, overexpression of uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1 was found to be associated with aggressive cancer recurrence postprostatectomy by IHC (25, 26). Encouraged by these data, we hypothesize that enzymatically active uPA can be selectively targeted for preclinical imaging in prostate cancer models. In this report, the development of a new technology for imaging prostate cancer centered on active uPA is detailed. Using a human fragment antigen-binding (Fab) phage display library, the active-site binding inhibitory antibody (termed U33) was discovered. U33 IgG was found to be a potent and selective inhibitor of uPA, displaying no affinity toward homologous proteases. Through a novel mechanism, we show that U33 IgG results in the internalization of uPA by uPAR, thereby mimicking the action of its endogenous inhibitor PAI-1. Labeled with a near-infrared (NIR) dye for optical imaging or 111In for SPECT, U33 IgG was used to detect active uPA in vivo in prostate cancer xenografts and in experimental mestatasis models. Because of its internalization, U33 IgG demonstrated high tumor retention in vivo with high signal to noise. These preclinical data presented justify a clinical trial to assess the impact of U33 IgG at imaging CRPC in men.

Cell culture

All cancer cells lines used in this study were purchased from the ATCC and were maintained in their respective recommended media, supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C. The cell lines were authenticated using short-tandem repeat profiling provided by the vendor. The uPAR knockout cell line was generated using uPAR shRNA Plasmid (h): sc-36781-SH from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Transfection was performed with a lentiviral particle according to the manufacturer's protocol. Following puromycin treatment, clones were selected using flow cytometry with an Alexa Fluor 488–labeled anti-uPAR antibody (27). Gene expression of the clone used for the xenograft study was analyzed using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and flow cytometry.

Quantitative PCR

RNA was prepared from each cell line (∼2 × 106 cells/cell line) using an RNEasy kit (Qiagen). Following RNA isolation, each sample was treated with Turbo DNA-free (Ambion) to remove any residual DNA. RNA was synthesized to cDNA using the High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems). For each gene, the TaqMan qPCR was performed in quadruplicate using the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The following TaqMan Gene Expression Assay probes were used: uPAR—Hs00182181_m1 PLAUR, uPA—Hs01547054_m1 PLAU, PAI-1 Hs01126606_m1, and 18s ribosomal 1 (reference gene) Hs03928985_g1 RN18S1. All qPCR were performed on an ABI 7300 Real Time PCR system instrument. Data were analyzed using the comparative Ct method (fold change = 2−ΔΔCt; ref. 28).

Histology

Immnofluoresence was performed on prostate cancer tissue microarrays purchased from US Biomax, Inc. (PR959). uPA was detected with antibody sc-14019 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:100) following the manufacturer's recommendation using an anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated secondary. The protocol for antigen retrieval and staining for e-cadherin was previously published (29).

Phage display panning

A fully human naïve Fab phage display library was used to identify inhibitory antibodies against human active uPA (30). Recombinant human uPA (R&D Systems) was immobilized overnight in wells of a MaxiSorp flat-bottomed 96-well plate (Nunc) at 20 μg/mL in PBS (137 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, Na2HPO4, 10 mmol/L, KH2PO4 2 mmol/L pH 7.4). The panning was accomplished in four rounds as described previously (31, 32). After four rounds of selection, Fab was produced from 192 individual clones in a 96-well format, the Fabs that leaked into the cell culture media were screened for binding to uPA by ELISA. Clones with a positive signal in ELISA were analyzed by BstNI restriction analysis to identify the unique clones. Clones with unique sequence were expressed, purified, and tested for inhibition of uPA.

IgG production

The heavy chain and light chain variable domains of U33 Fab sequence were cloned separately into pcDNA3.1-derived human IgG1 expression vectors, cotransfected into 293 F cells (Life Technologies) cells, and selected with both hygromycin and neomycin for 14 days. The stable cells were then subcloned and a high U33 antibody-expressing cell line, 8G4, was obtained. This cell line was expanded and grown in FreeStyle 293 medium (Life Technologies) using Wave System (GE) and supernatants were harvested after 10 to 12 days' culture. IgG was purified using a MabSelect SuRe Protein A column (GE), and followed by preparative size exclusion chromatography using a HiPrep 16/60 Sephacryl S-200 HR column (GE).

ELISA

MaxiSorp plates were coated with 50 μL of 5 μg/mL recombinant juman uPA (in some experiments, the zymogen, single chain uPA-pro-urokinase, or mouse uPA was used) in PBS overnight at 4°C. The unbound uPA was removed and the plate was washed with PBS and blocked with milk-PBS. Supernatants of Fab-induced cultures or serial dilutions of pure Fab ranging from 1 μmol/L to 0, were added to each well and incubated for 1 hour. Wells were washed with PBS–Tween and the Fab was detected with anti-myc antibody conjugated to peroxidase (Roche) and TMB reagent (Pierce). The absorbance was determined at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

Kinetic assays

Human uPA (6.2 nmol/L) was incubated with 1 μmol/L of Fab in assay buffer (50 mmol/L Tris pH 8.8, 0.01% Tween 20), after 1 hour of incubation at room temperature, the chromogenic substrate Spectrozyme uPA (American Diagnostica, Inc.) at a final concentration of 50 μmol/L was added. The reaction velocity was monitored by reading the absorbance at 405 nm. For the Ki calculation, 6.2 nmol/L of uPA was incubated with Fab (0–2 μmol/L) in assay buffer at room temperature for 5 hours. uPA activity was measured for each inhibitor concentration by addition of substrate (3.9 −500μmol/L). All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software. Inhibition of uPA bound to uPAR:uPAR was immobilized in wells of a MaxiSorp plate. uPA (2.5μg/mL) was added to uPAR-coated plates and incubated for 1 hour. After washing, serial dilutions of pure Fab ranging from 1 μmol/L to 16 nmol/L were added to the wells and incubated for 1 hour. For the specificity assays, U33 IgG was used at concentrations ranging from 2 to 0.010 μmol/L. Protease concentrations and fluorogenic substrates were used as previously described for the specificity assay (33).

Internalization

Cancer cell lines (30,000 cells/well in 12-well plates in triplicate) were incubated in conditioned media (protein concentration of 5 μg/mL) with 10 nmol/L (0.1 μCi) 111In-U33 or 111In-A11 for 0 to 4 hours at 4°C and 37°C. At the indicated time, the media were removed and the cells were washed with a mild acid buffer [50 mmol/L glycine, 150 mmol/L NaCl (pH 3.0)] at 4°C for 5 minutes. Cells were tryspinized and pelleted at 20,000 × g for 5 minutes. The supernatant (containing cell surface–bound radioactivity) and the cell pellet (containing internalized radioactivity) were counted on a Gamma counter.

Mass spectrometry

Protein identification of conditioned media was carried out as described with the following notable exceptions (34). Conditioned media samples (4 μg) were digested with trypsin (1:20 trypsin to protein ratio). Extracted peptides were sequenced with an LTQ-FT ICR mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). SwissProt database searches were conducted with mass tolerances of 20 ppm for parent ions and 0.6 Da for fragment ions using maximum expectation values of 0.01 for protein and 0.05 for peptide matches.

Animal models

The animal work was in accordance with a University of California, San Francisco (UCSF; San Francisco, CA) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol. Six- to 7-week-old nu/nu mice were purchased from Taconic Farms. Nude mouse xenografts were generated by subcutaneous injection of each cell line (1 × 106 cells/mL; 100 μL per site/mouse). Animals for imaging and biodistribution studies had tumor volumes between 100 and 350 mm3. The intracardiac dissemination model was generated using the previously described method (35).

In vivo optical imaging

U33 IgG was labeled with Alexa Fluor 680 and characterized in vivo using a previously published method. Images were collected in fluorescence mode on an IVIS 50 (Caliper/Xenogen) using Living Image 2.50.2 software at 24-hour intervals. Region of interest measurements were made and the fluorescence emission images were normalized to reference images and the unitless efficiency was computed. For bioluminescence imaging (BLI), the mice were injected with intraperitoneally with d-luciferin (150 mg/kg body weight). Images were acquired 10 minutes after the injection of d-luciferin and the total flux (p/s) in the region of interest was measured. For one PC3 xenograft, the tumor was removed at 72 hours and frozen in optimal cutting temperature. Blocks were cut into 8-μm sections, fixed in acetone for 10 minutes at −20°C, and mounted using ProLong Gold with DAPI. Probe localization was visualized in the Cy7 channel using a Nikon 6D High Throughput Epifluorescence Microscope.

Radiolabeling and SPECT/CT imaging

SPECT/CT.

The chelate group for 111In, 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (DOTA-NHS; Macrocyclics), was attached to lysine residues on the IgG using a 25:1 molar excess of chelate in a 0.1 mol/L NaHCO3, pH 9.0 buffer with an antibody concentration of 6 mg/mL. After 2 hours of labeling at room temperature, the antibody–DOTA conjugate was FPLC purified to remove unreacted DOTA–NHS. For 111In radiolabeling, 111InCl3 was purchased from PerkinElmer. To radiolabel the IgG, 50 μg of DOTA conjugate in 0.2 mol/L ammonium acetate (pH 6.0) was incubated with 12 μL of InCl3 (2.10 mCi) in 0.1 N HCl for 60 minutes at 40°C. The labeled products were purified using a PD-10 column preequilibrated with PBS buffer. Labeling efficiency and purity of the product were determined using thin-layer chromatography. The specific activity of 111In-U33 IgG was calculated to be 31.6 ± 4 mCi/mg (n = 4). For imaging, 2.5 to 5.0 μg of probe, corresponding to 275 to 360 μCi of activity, were injected into the tail vein. The mice were imaged using a Gamma Medica Ideas XSPECT SPECT/C system. Reconstructed data were analyzed with AMIDE and AMIRA software.

Biodistribution study

Mice (n = 4/time point) bearing PC3 and CWR22Rv1 xenografts were injected with 25 μCi (2.5 μg) of111In-U33 IgG. At 24, 48, and 72 hours, the animals were euthanized for analysis in accordance with UCSF Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture. The tumor, heart, lung, spleen, kidneys, and muscle were harvested, weighed, and counted in an automated γ-counter (Wizard2; PerkinElmer). The percentage of injected dose per gram (% ID/g) of tissue was calculated by comparison with standards of known radioactivity.

Identification of uPA in prostate cancer

qPCR determined that PAS expression was highest in the androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and DU145 (Fig. 1A). Little or no expression was documented in other prostate cancer cells lines, normal prostate epithelial cells (PrEC) and in the bladder cancer cell line TSU. Out of the two cell lines that expressed the PAS, the mRNA expression of uPAR and uPA were highest in PC3 cells, while DU145 cells expressed significantly higher PAI-1. Data have demonstrated that overexpression of the PAS can be induced by hypoxia in breast cancer models, and that hypoxia is common in prostate cancer (36, 37). PC3 and DU145 cells were cultured in 1.5% O2, to mimic the O2-deprived environment of prostate cancers, and the levels of the PAS were analyzed (Fig. 1B; refs. 38, 39). After 72 hours, hypoxia had induced a 2-fold increase in expression of the PAS members in PC3 cells. DU145 cells were less affected by hypoxia with only uPAR expression increased.

Figure 1.

uPA expression in prostate cancer cell lines and prostate cancer tissue microarray sections. A, mRNA levels of uPAR (top) and uPA and PAI-1 (bottom) were analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR in prostate cancer cell lines and normal human PrECs. B, qRT-PCR analysis of the PAS components in PC3 and DU145 cells cultured under 1.5% O2 for 72 hours. The increase in mRNA expression is compared with the cells grown under normoxia. C, IHC staining of a PC3 xenograft section (left) and a DU145 xenograft section (right) for total uPA protein using the antibody sc-14019. D–G, visualization of the total uPA protein in prostate cancer tissue microarray sections using immunofluoresence. H&E-stained sections are shown on the left with the merged fluoresence channels on the right with uPA (green), E-caderin (red), and nuclei (DAPI). The sections stained are: adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 5 (2 + 3) (D); adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 5 (1 + 4) (E); adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 9 (4 + 5) (F); bone metastasis (G).

Figure 1.

uPA expression in prostate cancer cell lines and prostate cancer tissue microarray sections. A, mRNA levels of uPAR (top) and uPA and PAI-1 (bottom) were analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR in prostate cancer cell lines and normal human PrECs. B, qRT-PCR analysis of the PAS components in PC3 and DU145 cells cultured under 1.5% O2 for 72 hours. The increase in mRNA expression is compared with the cells grown under normoxia. C, IHC staining of a PC3 xenograft section (left) and a DU145 xenograft section (right) for total uPA protein using the antibody sc-14019. D–G, visualization of the total uPA protein in prostate cancer tissue microarray sections using immunofluoresence. H&E-stained sections are shown on the left with the merged fluoresence channels on the right with uPA (green), E-caderin (red), and nuclei (DAPI). The sections stained are: adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 5 (2 + 3) (D); adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 5 (1 + 4) (E); adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 9 (4 + 5) (F); bone metastasis (G).

Close modal

The presence of uPA at the protein level was next investigated in tissue sections taken from subcutaneous PC3 and DU145 xenografts using IHC. A commercially available antibody (sc-14019) that recognized total uPA protein (zymogen uPA, active uPA, and PAI-1 bound uPA) detected uPA in both xenograft sections with more intense staining visible in the PC3 section (Fig. 1C). Total uPA protein was next visualized in a prostate cancer tissue microarray using immunofluorescence (IF; Fig. 1D–G). Total uPA protein was detected in adenocarcinomas and in osseous metastases with IF using the antibody sc-14019. Of the tumor sections found to be positive for uPA, 70% (28 of 40) were found to have Gleason score 7 or higher. This finding mirrored an earlier report by Cozzi and colleagues (24) that found that 76% of the uPA positive tumors were Gleason score 7 and or higher. In concordance with previous work, we documented that uPA was located in both the epithelium and stroma (14, 40).

U33 antibody development

A human naïve B-cell phage display library with a diversity of 4.1 × 1010 was used to identify inhibitory antibodies against human uPA. After four rounds of panning, 192 independent clones were screened by ELISA. Of these clones, 67 showed high ELISA signals and 23 had unique sequences. The 23 unique clones identified were expressed, purified, and tested for uPA inhibition. Clone U33 was the only Fab that exhibited inhibitory activity with sequence of U33 Fab shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. The affinity and specificity of U33 Fab were determined by quantitative ELISA and fluorogenic inhibition assays using human uPA (active and zymogen) and mouse uPA. ELISA results showed that U33 Fab bound to active uPA in a concentration-dependent manner, but not zymogen uPA or mouse uPA (Fig. 2A). The inhibition data using a fluorogenic substrate in Fig. 2B showed that U33 Fab inhibits more than 80% of human uPA activity and has no effect on the mouse enzyme.

Figure 2.

Characterization of the U33 clone. A, U33 Fab binds specifically to the active form of uPA. Serial dilutions of U33 Fab were added to uPA-coated plates and incubated for 1 hour. The amount of Fab bound to uPA was determined by ELISA. U33 Fab was only detected in wells coated with human active uPA. B, inhibition of human uPA by U33 Fab. The proteolytic activity of human or mouse uPA was read in the absence and presence of 1 μmol/L of U33 Fab. The enzyme activity is expressed as percentage of the uPA activity in the absence of Fab (100%). C, inhibition of uPA bound to uPAR. Serial dilutions of U33 Fab were added to uPAR–uPA–coated plates and incubated for 1 hour and the activity of uPA was read. D, U33 Fab prevents uPA binding to PAI-1–coated plates. Serial dilutions of U33 Fab (4 μmol/L–31.2 nmol/L) were preincubated overnight with uPA and added to PAI-1–coated plates. The amount of uPA bound to PAI was determined by ELISA. E, U33 does not bind to uPA inhibited by a CMK inhibitor. Serial dilutions of U33 (0.0625–1 μmol/L) were added to an uPA-coated plate preincubated with and without 1 μmol/L CMK. U33 Fab bound to uPA was determined by ELISA. F, the Lineweaver–Burk plot demonstrating that U33 IgG is a competitive inhibitor of uPA.

Figure 2.

Characterization of the U33 clone. A, U33 Fab binds specifically to the active form of uPA. Serial dilutions of U33 Fab were added to uPA-coated plates and incubated for 1 hour. The amount of Fab bound to uPA was determined by ELISA. U33 Fab was only detected in wells coated with human active uPA. B, inhibition of human uPA by U33 Fab. The proteolytic activity of human or mouse uPA was read in the absence and presence of 1 μmol/L of U33 Fab. The enzyme activity is expressed as percentage of the uPA activity in the absence of Fab (100%). C, inhibition of uPA bound to uPAR. Serial dilutions of U33 Fab were added to uPAR–uPA–coated plates and incubated for 1 hour and the activity of uPA was read. D, U33 Fab prevents uPA binding to PAI-1–coated plates. Serial dilutions of U33 Fab (4 μmol/L–31.2 nmol/L) were preincubated overnight with uPA and added to PAI-1–coated plates. The amount of uPA bound to PAI was determined by ELISA. E, U33 does not bind to uPA inhibited by a CMK inhibitor. Serial dilutions of U33 (0.0625–1 μmol/L) were added to an uPA-coated plate preincubated with and without 1 μmol/L CMK. U33 Fab bound to uPA was determined by ELISA. F, the Lineweaver–Burk plot demonstrating that U33 IgG is a competitive inhibitor of uPA.

Close modal

Under steady-state conditions, U33 Fab possessed a Ki of 20 nmol/L for soluble uPA (Supplementary Fig. S2) and was also able to inhibit uPA bound to uPAR (Fig. 2C). Further characterization studies were performed and found that U33 Fab could block binding of uPA to its endogenous inhibitor PAI-1 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2D), but was unable to dislodge PAI-1 in a preformed uPA–PAI-1 complex (Supplementary Fig. S3). The mechanism of inhibition of uPA by U33 Fab was next investigated. Active uPA was pretreated with the irreversible active site inhibitor Glu–Gly–Arg–chloromethyl ketone (CMK). When added to the uPA–CMK complex, the binding of U33 Fab to uPA was significantly decreased, suggesting that U33 Fab required a free unoccupied active site for binding and inhibition (Fig. 2E). The heavy and light chain variable domains of U33 Fab were cloned into a full-length IgG1 expression vector, cotransfected into 293 F cells, expressed and purified. Kinetic analysis using double reciprocal plots revealed that U33 IgG was a competitive inhibitor of uPA with a Ki of 10nmol/L (Fig. 2F). Additional characterization studies of U33 IgG were performed (Supplementary Fig. S4) and it was found that U33 IgG could displace the noncovalent small-molecule inhibitor p-aminobenzamidine in the active site of uPA when incubated with inhibited protease (Supplementary Fig. S5).

U33 IgG in vitro characterization

U33 IgG was specific for uPA when assayed against a panel of proteases using a fluorogenic substrate inhibition assay. No cross-reactivity was observed with proteases displaying an array of specificities, including the prostate cancer–associated serine proteases hK2, PSA, and KLK4 (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S6). U33 IgG was tested for its ability to inhibit trypsin-like proteolysis in PC3 and DU145 conditioned media (Fig. 3B). When incubated with the generic trypsin fluorogenic substrate, Z-Gly–Gly–Arg–AMC, PC3, and DU145 conditioned media showed substantial trypsin-like activity. Addition of 100-nmol/L U33 IgG inhibited all trypsin-like proteolytic activity. Proteomic analysis of the secreted proteases in the conditioned media found that both cells lines had high levels of uPA (Fig. 3C). The other proteases identified in the conditioned media did not display activity against the substrate, were not active at physiologic pH, or might have been in an inactive state such as zymogen.

Figure 3.

In vitro characterization studies of U33 IgG. A, specificity of U33 IgG for uPA compared with a panel of proteases. Proteases were treated with 1 μmol/L of U33 IgG in the presence of fluorogenic substrate. B, inhibition of trypsin-like proteolytic activity in the condition media of PC3 and DU145 cells by U33 IgG. Conditioned media (4.0 μg/mL protein concentration) were incubated with the trypsin cleavable fluorogenic substrate Z-Gly–Gly–Arg–AMC (ex. 355 nm; em. 460 nm) at 400 μmol/L in the presence and absence of U33 IgG. C, mass spectrometry proteomic analysis of secreted proteases from PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines. The cell lines PC3 and DU145 were cultured for 24 hours under serum-free conditions. The resulting conditioned media were digested with trypsin and the peptides were sequenced on an LTQ-FT ICR mass spectrometer followed by SwissProt database analysis. D, PC3 cellular internalization of 111In-U33 IgG at 37°C and 4°C in conditioned media. PC3 cells were incubated with 10 nmol/L of radiolabeled antibody at the indicated time points and were washed and treated with an acidic buffer to remove noncovalently bound and noninternalized 111In-U33 IgG. Each time point was performed in triplicate. E, internalization of 111In-U33 IgG at the 120-minute time point by the cells lines PC3, DU145, PC3 (uPAR-), and CWR22Rv1 in conditioned media. Blocking was performed by adding 1 μmol/L of cold U33 IgG or 1 μmol/L of 2G10 IgG before the media before addition of radiolabeled antibody. 111In-A11 IgG was used as the isotype control antibody for the PC3 cells.

Figure 3.

In vitro characterization studies of U33 IgG. A, specificity of U33 IgG for uPA compared with a panel of proteases. Proteases were treated with 1 μmol/L of U33 IgG in the presence of fluorogenic substrate. B, inhibition of trypsin-like proteolytic activity in the condition media of PC3 and DU145 cells by U33 IgG. Conditioned media (4.0 μg/mL protein concentration) were incubated with the trypsin cleavable fluorogenic substrate Z-Gly–Gly–Arg–AMC (ex. 355 nm; em. 460 nm) at 400 μmol/L in the presence and absence of U33 IgG. C, mass spectrometry proteomic analysis of secreted proteases from PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines. The cell lines PC3 and DU145 were cultured for 24 hours under serum-free conditions. The resulting conditioned media were digested with trypsin and the peptides were sequenced on an LTQ-FT ICR mass spectrometer followed by SwissProt database analysis. D, PC3 cellular internalization of 111In-U33 IgG at 37°C and 4°C in conditioned media. PC3 cells were incubated with 10 nmol/L of radiolabeled antibody at the indicated time points and were washed and treated with an acidic buffer to remove noncovalently bound and noninternalized 111In-U33 IgG. Each time point was performed in triplicate. E, internalization of 111In-U33 IgG at the 120-minute time point by the cells lines PC3, DU145, PC3 (uPAR-), and CWR22Rv1 in conditioned media. Blocking was performed by adding 1 μmol/L of cold U33 IgG or 1 μmol/L of 2G10 IgG before the media before addition of radiolabeled antibody. 111In-A11 IgG was used as the isotype control antibody for the PC3 cells.

Close modal

U33 IgG labeled with 111In via a DOTA chelate (111In-U33 IgG) was internalized by PC3 cells at 37°C with 72% of the total radioactivity internalized within 120 minutes (Fig. 3D). A study conducted at the 120-minute time point found that 111In-U33 IgG internalization was dependent on the presence of active uPA and uPAR (Fig. 3E). Internalization was observed in DU145 cells but was blocked in PC3 and DU145 cells pretreated with excess cold U33 IgG. Internalization was not observed in PC3 cells with uPAR expression knocked out. In PC3 cells expressing both active uPA and uPAR, 111In-U33 IgG internalization was prevented by the addition of an antagonistic uPAR antibody (2G10) that blocks uPA binding to uPAR. No internalization occurred in CWR22Rv1 cells and in PC3 cells treated with the isotype control 111In-A11 IgG.

U33 IgG in vivo imaging

Encouraged by the in vitro data, U33 IgG was tested for its ability to detect active uPA in vivo using NIR optical imaging. U33 IgG labeled with Alexa Fluor 680 (AF680-U33 IgG) allowed for the qualitative detection of active uPA in xenografts (Fig. 4A). Maximum probe localization was achieved at 72 hours with the PC3 xenograft demonstrating high tumor uptake and retention. Lower tumor uptake was observed in the DU145 xenograft corroborating the mRNA and IHC results. No probe localization was present in the CWR22Rv1 xenograft. Cryosectioning of the PC3 tumor at 72 hours, and subsequent imaging of AF680-U33 IgG with fluorescence microscopy, found probe penetration in the tumor tissue (Fig. 4B). The accumulation of the probe in the tumor was greater than in the liver, the main clearance organ for IgG antibodies (Fig. 4C). Graphing the fluorescence efficiency of the regions of interest for each of the mice imaged as a function of time highlighted the uptake kinetics and selectivity of the probe (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

Molecular imaging and biodistribution of U33 IgG in prostate cancer xenografts. A, NIR optical imaging of prostate cancer xenografts using AF680-U33 IgG. Mice bearing PC3, DU145, or CWR22Rv1 xenografts were tail-vein injected with 2 nmol/L of AF680-U33 IgG and imaged using NIR optical imaging. The images shown are representative of n = 3 mice/xenograft and were acquired 72 hours after injection. B, the resected PC3 tumor at 72 hours fluoresence intensity (left) and a tumor section demonstrating probe penetration and localization by fluoresence microscopy (right). C, probe fluoresence intensity (left) and localization (right) in the liver of a PC3 xenograft mouse. D, graph depicting the localization of AF680-U33 IgG as fluoresence efficiency of the tumor ROIs for the mice imaged using NIR optical imaging. Included in the graph are the data for the mice imaged with the isotype control AF680-A11 IgG in PC3 xenografts. E, SPECT imaging with 111In-U33 IgG in a PC3 xenograft model. Depicted are SPECT/CT images shown as a 3D volume rendering of the SPECT data (blue) overlaid onto surface rendered CT data and a reconstructed transverse view using a rainbow color scale to show uptake (below). Image is representative of n = 3 mice imaged with 111In-U33 IgG at 72 hours after injection. Each animal for imaging received 2.5 μg of antibody corresponding to 220 μCi of activity. F, probe biodistribution was determined by radioactivity assays in PC3 tumor-bearing mice (n = 4 for each time point). Tissues were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection of 111In-U33 IgG (25 μCi). Probe uptake is reported as %ID/g. G, tumor uptake specificity measured at 72 hours after injection (n = 4 mice for each treatment). PC3 xenograft bearing mice were treated with isotype control 111In-A11 IgG (25 μCi) and 111In-U33 IgG blocked (80% reduction) by i.v. preinjection of 200 μg of cold U33 IgG. Probe uptake in CWR22Rv1 xenografts is also depicted.

Figure 4.

Molecular imaging and biodistribution of U33 IgG in prostate cancer xenografts. A, NIR optical imaging of prostate cancer xenografts using AF680-U33 IgG. Mice bearing PC3, DU145, or CWR22Rv1 xenografts were tail-vein injected with 2 nmol/L of AF680-U33 IgG and imaged using NIR optical imaging. The images shown are representative of n = 3 mice/xenograft and were acquired 72 hours after injection. B, the resected PC3 tumor at 72 hours fluoresence intensity (left) and a tumor section demonstrating probe penetration and localization by fluoresence microscopy (right). C, probe fluoresence intensity (left) and localization (right) in the liver of a PC3 xenograft mouse. D, graph depicting the localization of AF680-U33 IgG as fluoresence efficiency of the tumor ROIs for the mice imaged using NIR optical imaging. Included in the graph are the data for the mice imaged with the isotype control AF680-A11 IgG in PC3 xenografts. E, SPECT imaging with 111In-U33 IgG in a PC3 xenograft model. Depicted are SPECT/CT images shown as a 3D volume rendering of the SPECT data (blue) overlaid onto surface rendered CT data and a reconstructed transverse view using a rainbow color scale to show uptake (below). Image is representative of n = 3 mice imaged with 111In-U33 IgG at 72 hours after injection. Each animal for imaging received 2.5 μg of antibody corresponding to 220 μCi of activity. F, probe biodistribution was determined by radioactivity assays in PC3 tumor-bearing mice (n = 4 for each time point). Tissues were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection of 111In-U33 IgG (25 μCi). Probe uptake is reported as %ID/g. G, tumor uptake specificity measured at 72 hours after injection (n = 4 mice for each treatment). PC3 xenograft bearing mice were treated with isotype control 111In-A11 IgG (25 μCi) and 111In-U33 IgG blocked (80% reduction) by i.v. preinjection of 200 μg of cold U33 IgG. Probe uptake in CWR22Rv1 xenografts is also depicted.

Close modal

The clinically relevant imaging modality SPECT/CT was next used to acquire three-dimensional (3D) tomographic data. 111In-U33 IgG localization was seen 72 hours after injection in the PC3 xenograft as documented by a pronounced tumor signal in the 3D data reconstruction and the 2D transverse view of the fused SPECT/CT image (Fig. 4E). In the SPECT/CT images, noticeable hepatic clearance of the probe was observed with little secondary accumulation in other locations. A biodistribution study of 111In-U33 IgG in the PC3 xenograft found that the probe accumulated preferentially over time in the tumor with a%ID/g of 43.2% at 72 hours (Fig. 4F). 111In-U33 IgG had low background in vivo with a tumor-to-blood ratio of 9.9 and a tumor-to-muscle ratio of 63. When treated with excess cold U33 IgG (200 μg) before radiotracer injection, probe accumulation was blocked 80% at 72 hours after injection (Fig. 4G.). No uptake of 111In-U33 IgG was found in the CWR22Rv1 xenograft with a %ID/g of 4.8% representing nonspecific tumor localization at 72 hours.

111In-U33 IgG was tested for its ability to detect small lesions that mimic human prostate cancer using a PC3 intracardiac dissemination model. The PC3 cells used for this model were engineered to stably express luciferase and the formation of experimental metastatic lesions was monitored by BLI after injection of luciferin. By week 6, distinct experimental metastases had formed in the bone, brain, and lymph nodes of the mice. 111In-U33 IgG imaged a pronounced osseous lesion in the jaw of this model that was identified by BLI (Fig. 5A). In the 2D and 3D reconstructed views, the lesion (11.6 mm3 volume) was located in the left mandible. The lesion was homogenized and the supernatant had marked trypsin-like proteolytic activity, when incubated with the fluorogenic trypsin substrate, compared with normal control tissue extracted from the right mandible (Fig. 5B). This proteolytic activity was inhibited by the addition of 100 nmol/L U33 IgG. In another example, 111In-U33 IgG was able to resolve a lesion from the skull infiltrating the brain (28.3 mm3 volume) identified by BLI (Fig. 5A). Staining of the lession for Ki-67 found that the lesion was highly proliferative compared with adjacent normal tissue (Fig. 5C). In addition to the skull-brain lesion, the 2D and 3D reconstructed views also showed the detection of lymph node lesions that were obscured by the intense signal coming from the brain lesion in the BLI image (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.

Imaging active uPA in the PC3 cardiac dissemination model with 111In-U33 IgG. A, 2D and 3D reconstructed 111In-SPECT/CT images of 111In-U33 IgG showing colocalization of the metastatic lesions with the BLI data. Yellow arrows, tumor location in the 2D images (top). Images showing the localization of the anti-uPA probe to an osseous metastatic lesion in the left mandible of the mouse (top) and probe localization to an infiltrating skull lesion and lymph node lesions (bottom). B, inhibition of the trypsin-like proteolytic activity by U33 IgG in the supernatant from the homogenized mandible lesion and control tissue. Supernatant from both homogenates (2.5 μg/mL protein concentration) were assayed for proteolytic activity using Z-Gly–Gly–Arg–AMC (400 μmol/L) in the presence and absence of 100 nmol/L U33 IgG. C, the imaged brain lesion was fixed, sectioned, and stained for Ki-67. Intense staining for Ki-67 is apparent in the cancerous lesion (top) compared with normal adjacent brain tissue (bottom).

Figure 5.

Imaging active uPA in the PC3 cardiac dissemination model with 111In-U33 IgG. A, 2D and 3D reconstructed 111In-SPECT/CT images of 111In-U33 IgG showing colocalization of the metastatic lesions with the BLI data. Yellow arrows, tumor location in the 2D images (top). Images showing the localization of the anti-uPA probe to an osseous metastatic lesion in the left mandible of the mouse (top) and probe localization to an infiltrating skull lesion and lymph node lesions (bottom). B, inhibition of the trypsin-like proteolytic activity by U33 IgG in the supernatant from the homogenized mandible lesion and control tissue. Supernatant from both homogenates (2.5 μg/mL protein concentration) were assayed for proteolytic activity using Z-Gly–Gly–Arg–AMC (400 μmol/L) in the presence and absence of 100 nmol/L U33 IgG. C, the imaged brain lesion was fixed, sectioned, and stained for Ki-67. Intense staining for Ki-67 is apparent in the cancerous lesion (top) compared with normal adjacent brain tissue (bottom).

Close modal

In this article, the development of the SPECT imaging probe, U33 IgG, is documented from its initial discovery, using a human antibody identified from a Fab phage display library, to its preclinical evaluation in vivo in prostate cancer models. Targeting the active form of uPA, U33 IgG detects a serine protease found extensively in prostate cancer. In healthy prostate tissue, the uPA promoter is epigenetically silenced by hypermethylation, resulting in no detectable uPA in the prostate (41, 42). As prostate cancer progresses, methylation patterns change and uPA is expressed (42). High levels of uPA protein in tumor tissue and serum have directly correlated with cancer progression, metastasis, and poor clinical outcome in men with prostate cancer (23–25, 43, 44). In vitro uPA expression was highest in the androgen-independent cell lines, PC3 and DU145, and expression was significantly increased in PC3 cells under hypoxia. Prostate cancer cell lines that express androgen receptor (AR) can be induced to express uPA when treated with demethylating agents. LNCaP cells challenged with 5-azacytidine were found to turn on uPA expression, resulting in cells that were more proliferative and invasive than the parental line in vitro and in vivo (42). Although only expressed in two clonal-derived cell lines, IF found total uPA protein was present in prostate tumors of every grade and in both soft tissue and osseous metastases. These data support and further validate the earlier findings attesting to the presence of uPA in both AR-positive and AR-negative prostate cancer and also speak to the paucity of good in vitro models that accurately reflect human disease in prostate cancer research (23–25, 40, 45).

The development of uPA inhibitors has mainly focused on low molecular weight compound (46–48). The further translation of these molecules has been prevented by poor specificity and off-target effects. A previous attempt to develop an inhibitory antibody for uPA gave a human monoclonal antibody with a low nanomolar affinity (49). This antibody could not, however, distinguish between active uPA and pro-uPA and lacked species specificity. Studies with U33 Fab found that the antibody could inhibit both secreted and uPAR-bound uPA in the low nanomolar range and was specific for the active human form. U33 Fab could not bind to uPA inhibited by PAI-1 or displace PAI-1 from the complex. Inhibition studies against other proteases, including S1A proteases associated with prostate cancer, found U33 IgG to be a specific, competitive inhibitor of uPA. Further evidence for U33 binding to the active site was provided by use of active site–directed uPA inhibitors. U33 IgG could displace a noncovalent small-molecule inhibitor from the S1 pocket of uPA and preincubation of uPA with a covalent CMK inhibitor blocked U33 binding. On the basis of these data, we demonstrate that U33 specifically targets active uPA in vitro and in vivo with an accuracy not seen with other uPA inhibitory antibodies or small molecules.

The imaging properties of U33 IgG in vivo were characteristic of antibody imaging probes that target membrane proteins. Although targeting a secreted protein, U33 IgG demonstrated high tumor uptake and retention in uPA–uPAR–expressing xenografts by NIR and SPECT imaging. U33 IgG was sensitive enough to detect small osseous and soft tissue metastatic lesions a few millimeters in size using SPECT/CT. Key to the success of U33 IgG as an imaging probe was its internalization through an uPAR-mediated mechanism. Internalization was blocked with excess cold U33 IgG and not observed in PC3 cells with uPAR expression knocked out or in PC3 cells with the uPA–uPAR binding epitope blocked by an antibody. These results suggest an internalization mechanism requiring active uPA and uPAR, with U33 IgG mimicking PAI-1. Both PAI-1 and U33 IgG bind to the C-terminal protease domain, whereas uPAR binds to the N-terminal domain of uPA. Furthermore, PAI-1 inhibition of uPA-bound uPAR results in internalization of the uPA–uPAR–PAI-1 complex. In vivo the internalization mechanism of U33 IgG afforded probe accumulation and sequestration in tumor tissue. Internalization prevented the dissemination of uPA–U33 IgG complex to peripheral tissue, resulting in high tumor uptake values that increased over time as demonstrated by the biodistribution. The internalization of U33 IgG is in direct contrast to a recent study that targeted another secreted protease, PSA, for PET imaging using a murine IgG antibody (89Zr-5A10; ref. 50). With no means of internalization or bioaccumulation, 89Zr-5A10 uptake reached its maximum uptake 24 hours after injection with a low tumor-to-blood ratio. There are no published reports of an antibody that binds to a protease receptor ligand mimicking the activity of the endogenous inhibitor and causing the internalization of the antibody–ligand–receptor complex.

Several research groups have imaged the PAS by targeting the uPA receptor, uPAR, using antibodies and peptides (51, 52). The subsequent translation of uPAR-targeted antibodies failed because of a lack of specificity or humanization affected their affinity. The data presented here document the first time the PAS has been imaged by targeting uPA instead of uPAR using a clinically relevant imaging modality. By targeting uPA instead of uPAR, we gain a greater insight into the proteolytic activity of the cancer. Increased proteolysis is a common trait of aggressive cancer with a high metastatic potential and studies have directly correlated increased uPA levels with disease progression and metastasis (22, 53). Because U33 only binds active uPA, U33 directly informs about the amount of uPA activity in the system. The levels of active uPA can change based on the depletion of activating proteases, such as hK2 or MMP-9, due to treatment. This decrease in active uPA could be detected with U33—decreased proteolytic activity can act as surrogate marker of indolence and regression.

Together, our data demonstrate that U33 is a unique, potent, and selective active site inhibitor of uPA that can be used to image prostate cancer in preclinical models. While secreted, uPA remains largely restricted to the tumor microenvironment because of its interaction with uPAR. uPA that does escape into circulation is quickly inactivated by macromolecular protease inhibitors. U33 IgG would not bind to complexed uPA in the blood, thus preventing a disseminated imaging probe that would reduce target to nontarget ratios. Because both uPA and uPAR are expressed by cancerous prostate cells and tumor-associated stromal cells, our uPA-targeted probe has the ability to detect the tumor cells and the abetting microenvironment with a single agent. Notably, the utility of U33 IgG is not limited to prostate cancer. uPA and the other components of the PAS are overexpressed in a myriad of cancers ranging from ovarian to breast (54). In addition, U33 IgG has the potential to be both a diagnostic and therapeutic agent. The internalization and clearance from the blood makes U33 IgG an ideal candidate for radioimmunotherapy. The unique mechanism of U33 antibody accumulation in tumors expressing active uPA and uPAR presents significant opportunities for clinical applications from diagnostic imaging to therapeutic intervention.

D.R. Hostetter is a senior scientist at CytomX Therapeutics and has ownership interest (including patents) in the same. H. Lowman reports receiving other commercial research support from CytomX Therapeutics; has ownership interest (including patents) in CytomX Therapeutics; and is a consultant/advisory board member for the same. C.S. Craik reports receiving a commercial research grant from CytomX Therapeutics; has ownership interest (including patents) in Stock Options; and is a consultant/advisory board member for CytomX Therapeutics. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design: A.M. LeBeau, N. Sevillano, D.R. Hostetter, J. West, H. Lowman, C.S. Craik, H.F. VanBrocklin

Development of methodology: A.M. LeBeau, N. Sevillano, D.R. Hostetter, J. West, H. Lowman, C.S. Craik

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): A.M. LeBeau, N. Sevillano, K. Markham, M.B. Winter, S.T. Murphy, D.R. Hostetter, J. West, H.F. VanBrocklin

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): A.M. LeBeau, N. Sevillano, M.B. Winter, D.R. Hostetter, J. West, H.F. VanBrocklin

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A.M. LeBeau, N. Sevillano, M.B. Winter, D.R. Hostetter, H.F. VanBrocklin

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): A.M. LeBeau, S.T. Murphy, D.R. Hostetter, J. West

Study supervision: A.M. LeBeau, D.R. Hostetter, J. West, C.S. Craik, H.F. VanBrocklin

The authors thank Fei Han, Jason Gee, Shouchun Liu, and Jeanne Flandez of CytomX Therapeutics, Inc., for construction, expression, and purification of U33 IgG.

This work was supported by the Rogers Family Award (C.S. Craik and H.F. VanBrocklin) and the NIH grant R01 CA128765 (C.S. Craik). A.M. LeBeau was supported by a DOD Prostate Cancer Postdoctoral Award PC094386 and the DOD Idea Award PC111318. A.M. LeBeau is currently the Steve Wynn 2013 Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Jemal
A
,
Siegel
R
,
Xu
J
,
Ward
E
. 
Cancer statistics, 2010.
CA Cancer J Clin
2010
;
60
:
277
300
.
2.
Denmeade
SR
,
Isaacs
JT
. 
Development of prostate cancer treatment: the good news.
The Prostate
2004
;
58
:
211
24
.
3.
Schweizer
MT
,
Antonarakis
ES
. 
Abiraterone and other novel androgen-directed strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer: a new era of hormonal therapies is born.
Ther Adv Urol
2012
;
4
:
167
78
.
4.
Brassell
SA
,
Rosner
IL
,
McLeod
DG
. 
Update on magnetic resonance imaging, ProstaScint, and novel imaging in prostate cancer.
Curr Opin Urol
2005
;
15
:
163
6
.
5.
Keshari
KR
,
Wilson
DM
. 
Chemistry and biochemistry of 13C hyperpolarized magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization.
Chem Soc Rev
2014
;
43
:
1627
59
.
6.
Lawrentschuk
N
,
Davis
ID
,
Bolton
DM
,
Scott
AM
. 
Diagnostic and therapeutic use of radioisotopes for bony disease in prostate cancer: current practice.
Int J Urol
2007
;
14
:
89
95
.
7.
Evans
MJ
. 
Measuring oncogenic signaling pathways in cancer with PET: an emerging paradigm from studies in castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Cancer Discov
2012
;
2
:
985
94
.
8.
Jadvar
H
. 
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer with PET.
J Nucl Med
2013
;
54
:
1685
8
.
9.
Kairemo
K
,
Rasulova
N
,
Partanen
K
,
Joensuu
T
. 
Preliminary clinical experience of trans-1-amino-3-(18)F-fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic Acid (anti-(18)F-FACBC) PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients.
Biomed Res Int
2014
;
2014
:
305182
.
10.
Manyak
MJ
. 
Indium-111 capromab pendetide in the management of recurrent prostate cancer.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther
2008
;
8
:
175
81
.
11.
Rieter
WJ
,
Keane
TE
,
Ahlman
MA
,
Ellis
CT
,
Spicer
KM
,
Gordon
LL
. 
Diagnostic performance of In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT/CT in localized and metastatic prostate cancer.
Clin Nucl Med
2011
;
36
:
872
8
.
12.
Bander
NH
,
Trabulsi
EJ
,
Kostakoglu
L
,
Yao
D
,
Vallabhajosula
S
,
Smith-Jones
P
, et al
Targeting metastatic prostate cancer with radiolabeled monoclonal antibody J591 to the extracellular domain of prostate specific membrane antigen.
J Urol
2003
;
170
:
1717
21
.
13.
Cho
SY
,
Gage
KL
,
Mease
RC
,
Senthamizhchelvan
S
,
Holt
DP
,
Jeffrey-Kwanisai
A
, et al
Biodistribution, tumor detection, and radiation dosimetry of 18F-DCFBC, a low-molecular-weight inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
J Nucl Med
2012
;
53
:
1883
91
.
14.
Li
Y
,
Cozzi
PJ
. 
Targeting uPA/uPAR in prostate cancer.
Cancer Treat Rev
2007
;
33
:
521
7
.
15.
Crowley
CW
,
Cohen
RL
,
Lucas
BK
,
Liu
G
,
Shuman
MA
,
Levinson
AD
. 
Prevention of metastasis by inhibition of the urokinase receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1993
;
90
:
5021
5
.
16.
Rabbani
SA
,
Ateeq
B
,
Arakelian
A
,
Valentino
ML
,
Shaw
DE
,
Dauffenbach
LM
, et al
An anti-urokinase plasminogen activator receptor antibody (ATN-658) blocks prostate cancer invasion, migration, growth, and experimental skeletal metastasis in vitro and in vivo.
Neoplasia
2010
;
12
:
778
88
.
17.
Logothetis
CJ
,
Lin
SH
. 
Osteoblasts in prostate cancer metastasis to bone.
Nat Rev Cancer
2005
;
5
:
21
8
.
18.
Kirchheimer
JC
,
Pfluger
H
,
Ritschl
P
,
Hienert
G
,
Binder
BR
. 
Plasminogen activator activity in bone metastases of prostatic carcinomas as compared to primary tumors.
Invasion Metastasis
1985
;
5
:
344
55
.
19.
Czekay
RP
,
Wilkins-Port
CE
,
Higgins
SP
,
Freytag
J
,
Overstreet
JM
,
Klein
RM
, et al
PAI-1: an integrator of cell signaling and migration.
Int J Cell Biol
2011
;
2011
:
562481
.
20.
Mikolajczyk
SD
,
Millar
LS
,
Kumar
A
,
Saedi
MS
. 
Prostatic human kallikrein 2 inactivates and complexes with plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.
Int J Cancer
1999
;
81
:
438
42
.
21.
Shariat
SF
,
Roehrborn
CG
,
McConnell
JD
,
Park
S
,
Alam
N
,
Wheeler
TM
, et al
Association of the circulating levels of the urokinase system of plasminogen activation with the presence of prostate cancer and invasion, progression, and metastasis.
J Clin Oncol
2007
;
25
:
349
55
.
22.
Shariat
SF
,
Karam
JA
,
Margulis
V
,
Karakiewicz
PI
. 
New blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer.
BJU Int
2008
;
101
:
675
83
.
23.
Hienert
G
,
Kirchheimer
JC
,
Pfluger
H
,
Binder
BR
. 
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator as a marker for the formation of distant metastases in prostatic carcinomas.
J Urol
1988
;
140
:
1466
9
.
24.
Cozzi
PJ
,
Wang
J
,
Delprado
W
,
Madigan
MC
,
Fairy
S
,
Russell
PJ
, et al
Evaluation of urokinase plasminogen activator and its receptor in different grades of human prostate cancer.
Hum Pathol
2006
;
37
:
1442
51
.
25.
Kumano
M
,
Miyake
H
,
Muramaki
M
,
Furukawa
J
,
Takenaka
A
,
Fujisawa
M
. 
Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in prostate cancer: correlation with clinicopathological outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Urol Oncol.
2009
;
27
:
180
6
.
26.
Gupta
A
,
Lotan
Y
,
Ashfaq
R
,
Roehrborn
CG
,
Raj
GV
,
Aragaki
CC
, et al
Predictive value of the differential expression of the urokinase plasminogen activation axis in radical prostatectomy patients.
European Urol
2009
;
55
:
1124
33
.
27.
Lebeau
AM
,
Duriseti
S
,
Murphy
ST
,
Pepin
F
,
Hann
B
,
Gray
JW
, et al
Targeting uPAR with antagonistic recombinant human antibodies in aggressive breast cancer.
Cancer Res
2013
;
73
:
2070
81
.
28.
Schmittgen
TD
,
Livak
KJ
. 
Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method.
Nat Protoc
2008
;
3
:
1101
8
.
29.
LeBeau
AM
,
Lee
M
,
Murphy
ST
,
Hann
BC
,
Warren
RS
,
Delos Santos
R
, et al
Imaging a functional tumorigenic biomarker in the transformed epithelium.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2013
;
110
:
93
8
.
30.
de Haard
HJ
,
van Neer
N
,
Reurs
A
,
Hufton
SE
,
Roovers
RC
,
Henderikx
P
, et al
A large non-immunized human Fab fragment phage library that permits rapid isolation and kinetic analysis of high affinity antibodies.
J Biol Chem
1999
;
274
:
18218
30
.
31.
Sun
J
,
Pons
J
,
Craik
CS
. 
Potent and selective inhibition of membrane-type serine protease 1 by human single-chain antibodies.
Biochemistry
2003
;
42
:
892
900
.
32.
Duriseti
S
,
Goetz
DH
,
Hostetter
DR
,
LeBeau
AM
,
Wei
Y
,
Craik
CS
. 
Antagonistic anti-urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) antibodies significantly inhibit uPAR-mediated cellular signaling and migration.
J Biol Chem
2010
;
285
:
26878
88
.
33.
LeBeau
AM
,
Singh
P
,
Isaacs
JT
,
Denmeade
SR
. 
Potent and selective peptidyl boronic acid inhibitors of the serine protease prostate-specific antigen.
Chem Biol
2008
;
15
:
665
74
.
34.
O'Donoghue
AJ
,
Eroy-Reveles
AA
,
Knudsen
GM
,
Ingram
J
,
Zhou
M
,
Statnekov
JB
, et al
Global identification of peptidase specificity by multiplex substrate profiling.
Nat Methods
2012
;
9
:
1095
100
.
35.
Park
SI
,
Kim
SJ
,
McCauley
LK
,
Gallick
GE
. 
Pre-clinical mouse models of human prostate cancer and their utility in drug discovery.
Curr Protoc Pharmacol
2010
;
14
:
Unit 14 5
.
36.
Jo
M
,
Lester
RD
,
Montel
V
,
Eastman
B
,
Takimoto
S
,
Gonias
SL
. 
Reversibility of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) induced in breast cancer cells by activation of urokinase receptor-dependent cell signaling.
J Biol Chem
2009
;
284
:
22825
33
.
37.
Milosevic
M
,
Warde
P
,
Menard
C
,
Chung
P
,
Toi
A
,
Ishkanian
A
, et al
Tumor hypoxia predicts biochemical failure following radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Clin Cancer Res
2012
;
18
:
2108
14
.
38.
Stewart
GD
,
Ross
JA
,
McLaren
DB
,
Parker
CC
,
Habib
FK
,
Riddick
AC
. 
The relevance of a hypoxic tumour microenvironment in prostate cancer.
BJU Int
2010
;
105
:
8
13
.
39.
Cheng
HH
,
Mitchell
PS
,
Kroh
EM
,
Dowell
AE
,
Chery
L
,
Siddiqui
J
, et al
Circulating microRNA profiling identifies a subset of metastatic prostate cancer patients with evidence of cancer-associated hypoxia.
PLoS ONE
2013
;
8
:
e69239
.
40.
Usher
PA
,
Thomsen
OF
,
Iversen
P
,
Johnsen
M
,
Brunner
N
,
Hoyer-Hansen
G
, et al
Expression of urokinase plasminogen activator, its receptor and type-1 inhibitor in malignant and benign prostate tissue.
Int J Cancer
2005
;
113
:
870
80
.
41.
Shukeir
N
,
Pakneshan
P
,
Chen
G
,
Szyf
M
,
Rabbani
SA
. 
Alteration of the methylation status of tumor-promoting genes decreases prostate cancer cell invasiveness and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
9202
10
.
42.
Pakneshan
P
,
Xing
RH
,
Rabbani
SA
. 
Methylation status of uPA promoter as a molecular mechanism regulating prostate cancer invasion and growth in vitro and in vivo.
FASEB J.
2003
;
17
:
1081
8
.
43.
Shariat
SF
,
Semjonow
A
,
Lilja
H
,
Savage
C
,
Vickers
AJ
,
Bjartell
A
. 
Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.
Acta Oncol
2011
;
50
:
61
75
.
44.
Miyake
H
,
Hara
I
,
Yamanaka
K
,
Gohji
K
,
Arakawa
S
,
Kamidono
S
. 
Elevation of serum levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor is associated with disease progression and prognosis in patients with prostate cancer.
Prostate
1999
;
39
:
123
9
.
45.
Kogianni
G
,
Walker
MM
,
Waxman
J
,
Sturge
J
. 
Endo180 expression with cofunctional partners MT1-MMP and uPAR-uPA is correlated with prostate cancer progression.
Eur J Cancer
2009
;
45
:
685
93
.
46.
Zhu
M
,
Gokhale
VM
,
Szabo
L
,
Munoz
RM
,
Baek
H
,
Bashyam
S
, et al
Identification of a novel inhibitor of urokinase-type plasminogen activator.
Mol Cancer Ther
2007
;
6
:
1348
56
.
47.
Schweinitz
A
,
Steinmetzer
T
,
Banke
IJ
,
Arlt
MJ
,
Sturzebecher
A
,
Schuster
O
, et al
Design of novel and selective inhibitors of urokinase-type plasminogen activator with improved pharmacokinetic properties for use as antimetastatic agents.
J Biol Chem
2004
;
279
:
33613
22
.
48.
Rockway
TW
,
Giranda
VL
. 
Inhibitors of the proteolytic activity of urokinase type plasminogen activator.
Curr Pharm Des
2003
;
9
:
1483
98
.
49.
Sgier
D
,
Zuberbuehler
K
,
Pfaffen
S
,
Neri
D
. 
Isolation and characterization of an inhibitory human monoclonal antibody specific to the urokinase-type plasminogen activator, uPA.
Protein Eng Des Sel
2010
;
23
:
261
9
.
50.
Ulmert
D
,
Evans
MJ
,
Holland
JP
,
Rice
SL
,
Wongvipat
J
,
Pettersson
K
, et al
Imaging androgen receptor signaling with a radiotracer targeting free prostate-specific antigen.
Cancer Discov
2012
;
2
:
320
7
.
51.
Kriegbaum
MC
,
Persson
M
,
Haldager
L
,
Alpizar-Alpizar
W
,
Jacobsen
B
,
Gardsvoll
H
, et al
Rational targeting of the urokinase receptor (uPAR): development of antagonists and non-invasive imaging probes.
Curr Drug Targets
2011
;
12
:
1711
28
.
52.
Rabbani
SA
,
Gladu
J
. 
Urokinase receptor antibody can reduce tumor volume and detect the presence of occult tumor metastases in vivo.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
2390
7
.
53.
Gaylis
FD
,
Keer
HN
,
Wilson
MJ
,
Kwaan
HC
,
Sinha
AA
,
Kozlowski
JM
. 
Plasminogen activators in human prostate cancer cell lines and tumors: correlation with the aggressive phenotype.
J Urol
1989
;
142
:
193
8
.
54.
Dass
K
,
Ahmad
A
,
Azmi
AS
,
Sarkar
SH
,
Sarkar
FH
. 
Evolving role of uPA/uPAR system in human cancers.
Cancer Treat Rev
2008
;
34
:
122
36
.