The ability to observe changes in molecular behavior during cancer cell invasion in vivo remains a major challenge to our understanding of the metastatic process. Here, we demonstrate for the first time, an analysis of RhoA activity at a subcellular level using FLIM-FRET (fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-fluorescence resonance energy transfer) imaging in a live animal model of pancreatic cancer. In invasive mouse pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells driven by mutant p53 (p53R172H), we observed a discrete fraction of high RhoA activity at both the leading edge and rear of cells in vivo which was absent in two-dimensional in vitro cultures. Notably, this pool of active RhoA was absent in noninvasive p53fl knockout PDAC cells, correlating with their poor invasive potential in vivo. We used dasatanib, a clinically approved anti-invasive agent that is active in this model, to illustrate the functional importance of spatially regulated RhoA. Dasatanib inhibited the activity of RhoA at the poles of p53R172H cells in vivo and this effect was independent of basal RhoA activity within the cell body. Taken together, quantitative in vivo fluorescence lifetime imaging illustrated that RhoA is not only necessary for invasion, but also that subcellular spatial regulation of RhoA activity, as opposed to its global activity, is likely to govern invasion efficiency in vivo. Our findings reveal the utility of FLIM-FRET in analyzing dynamic biomarkers during drug treatment in living animals, and they also show how discrete intracellular molecular pools might be differentially manipulated by future anti-invasive therapies. Cancer Res; 71(3); 747–57. ©2011 AACR.

Coordinated activity of the RhoGTPases RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 has been extensively studied during cell motility and migration in vitro (1). RhoA is known to control actomyosin-based contractility and retraction at the rear of the cell whereas Rac and Cdc42 regulate lamellipodia and filopodia formation at the front of the cell, respectively (2, 3). The ability to visualize the precise spatial and temporal activity of RhoGTPase family members using fluorescent reporters in vitro has rapidly enhanced our understanding of their distinct roles in cell motility (4–7). This approach has also provided an insight into their role in other key biological processes and diseases such as cancer (4, 8, 9). Recently, several elegant studies have focused on RhoA activity during the initial events of protrusion at the leading edge and poles of cells in vitro (5, 10–12). In particular, using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) reporters of individual RhoGTPases simultaneously within the same cell, RhoA activity was shown to synchronize with leading edge protrusion both spatially and temporally (11). This, in combination with the recent manipulation of Rac1 and Cdc42 activity using light-switchable probes, has confirmed that RhoA activity plays a key role in protrusion in addition to its previously reported role in cell retraction during cell motility (12). Altered expression or activity of RhoA has been positively correlated with numerous forms of human metastatic disease (8, 13–15), and taken with these novel findings regarding RhoA activity at the cell poles during motility, prompted us to assess, for the first time, the spatial regulation of RhoA activity during cancer cell invasion in live animals.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal forms of human cancer, with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 5% (16, 17). Initiating Kras mutations occur in approximately 90% of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC; refs. 18–20) whereas TP53 mutations arise in 50% to 75% of human pancreatic cancers (21). Previously, we have utilized a recently developed mouse model of invasive and metastatic pancreatic cancer (22) in which Cre-Lox technology is used to target KrasG12D and mutant p53R172H to the mouse pancreas via the Pdxl promoter. This results in the formation of preinvasive pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (PanIN) which develop into invasive and metastatic PDACs (22). Using this model, we have recently demonstrated that mutations of Trp53, rather than loss of p53, drives invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer, thereby indicating a gain-of-function role for the accumulation of mutant p53 (23). Moreover, we and others have shown that mutant p53 drives invasion and metastasis in cancers other than the pancreas including colon, lung, and breast cancer (24, 25). Recently, cooperation between mutant p53 and oncogenic Ras has been shown to activate RhoA and induce cell motility in vitro (26). In line with this, mutant p53 has also been shown to induce the expression of the RhoA-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1, a regulator of RhoA activity at the leading edge and rear of the cell during motility in a large number of cancer types including the pancreas (27, 28).

As the KrasG12D/p53R172H mouse model (22) recapitulates human pancreatic tumorigenesis in terms of histopathology, disease progression, and metastatic profile (29, 30), it provides an excellent system to examine for the first time the precise spatial regulation of RhoA activity in an in vivo model of invasive pancreatic cancer. To investigate the activity of RhoA, we initially established cells from invasive pancreatic tumors of Pdxl-Cre, LSL-KRasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+ mice and corresponding noninvasive tumor cells from Pdx1-Cre, LSL-KRasG12D/+, Trp53LoxP/+ mice (23). From these cells, we generated stable PDAC lines expressing a modified version of the Raichu-RhoA FRET reporter (4, 31). RhoA activity in individual cells within subcutaneous tumors was then assessed using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)-FRET in live animals, allowing us to observe this phenomenon in a more physiologic and functional context. Importantly, we demonstrate spatially restricted pools of RhoA activity that are specifically sensitive to drug treatment and correlate with invasion in vivo. This result, taken with our assessment of RhoA activity during organotypic invasion, demonstrates significant differences in the subcellular spatial regulation of RhoA in 3 dimensions compared with standard 2-dimensional culture models. Importantly, this work highlights the advantages of live, subcellular, animal imaging in the assessment of invasion and metastasis and demonstrates that FLIM-FRET imaging can be adapted for the in vivo assessment and quantification of subtle, context-dependent responses to therapeutic intervention in the treatment of cancer.

Cell culture

Primary mouse PDACs were derived from tumors harvested from Pdx1-Cre-GFP, LSL-KRasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+ mice and Pdx1-Cre-GFP, LSL-KRasG12D/+, Trp53LoxP/+ mice (23). Cell lines were tested 1 month before experiments and authenticated by morphology, growth curve analysis, and Mycoplasma detection in accordance with the ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) cell line verification test recommendations and cultured as described in detail in SI Materials and Methods.

Drug treatment in vitro and in vivo

Dasatinib (a kind gift from Bristol Myers Squibb) was administered daily by oral gavage in 80 mmol/L citrate buffer (10 mg/kg) or 100 nmol/L in vitro (32). ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Calbiochem) was used at 10 μmol/L and cell-permeable C3 Transferase (Cytoskeleton) was used at 0.125 μg/mL.

Plasmids

For details of the modified GFP-RFP Raichu-RhoA reporter, see SI Materials and Methods.

Organotypic invasion assay

Organotypic cultures were set up as described (33).

RhoA activity assay

GTP loading of RhoA was determined using a RhoA activation kit as described in manufacturer's protocol (cytoskeleton).

Imaging

All imaging was performed on a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U inverted microscope with a LaVision Biotec Trim-scope scan head. See SI Materials and Methods.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging of RhoA FRET reporter in vitro and in vivo

For detailed procedure, see SI Materials and Methods.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using the built-in TCSPC fluorescence lifetime analysis functionality of ImSpectorPro (LaVison Biotec). See details in SI Materials and Methods.

Generation of a FLIM-FRET–based genetic model of invasive pancreatic cancer

The use of FLIM to measure FRET reporters has rapidly enhanced our understanding of various biological processes by allowing us to obtain a detailed picture of protein behavior both spatially and temporally in vitro (34, 35). To study RhoA activity during pancreatic cancer cell invasion in vivo, we first established primary invasive pancreatic tumor cell lines from Pdxl-Cre, LSL-KRasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+ mice and noninvasive pancreatic tumor cell lines from Pdx1-Cre, LSL-KRasG12D/+, Trp53LoxP/+ mice (23). Using these cells, we then generated stable PDAC cell lines expressing a GFP-RFP variant of the Raichu-RhoA FRET-reporter (Fig. 1A; refs. 4, 31). The resulting invasive mutant p53R172H and noninvasive p53fl PDAC cells expressing the RhoA-reporter with a common initiating KrasG12D/+ mutation (22) serve as an excellent genetic and fluorescent model system to directly compare the spatial regulation of RhoA activity in pancreatic cancer.

Figure 1.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging of RhoA activity within a migrating pancreatic tumor cell population during wound healing. A, schematic of the adapted GFP-RFP Raichu-RhoA reporter adapted from Yoshizaki and colleagues (4). B, quantification of lifetime measurements in p53fl or p53R172H PDAC cells transiently transfected with dominant negative (T19N) or constitutively active (Q63L) mutants of the Raichu-RhoA reporter. C and D, representative fluorescence image of p53R172H PDAC cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) at the front or rear of a wound with corresponding lifetime maps of RhoA activity. White arrows depict active cells. E, quantification of lifetime measurements of RhoA activity for cells at the front or rear of the wound. Cells were classed to be at the front of the wound within the first 3 cells from the wound border. F, anti-Rho immunoblot of total cell lysate and GST-Rhotekin “pull-down” (GTP-Rho) from confluent versus single or multiple wounded p53R172H PDAC cells. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Figure 1.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging of RhoA activity within a migrating pancreatic tumor cell population during wound healing. A, schematic of the adapted GFP-RFP Raichu-RhoA reporter adapted from Yoshizaki and colleagues (4). B, quantification of lifetime measurements in p53fl or p53R172H PDAC cells transiently transfected with dominant negative (T19N) or constitutively active (Q63L) mutants of the Raichu-RhoA reporter. C and D, representative fluorescence image of p53R172H PDAC cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) at the front or rear of a wound with corresponding lifetime maps of RhoA activity. White arrows depict active cells. E, quantification of lifetime measurements of RhoA activity for cells at the front or rear of the wound. Cells were classed to be at the front of the wound within the first 3 cells from the wound border. F, anti-Rho immunoblot of total cell lysate and GST-Rhotekin “pull-down” (GTP-Rho) from confluent versus single or multiple wounded p53R172H PDAC cells. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Close modal

To examine the maximum dynamic range of the adapted Raichu-RhoA probe in its “open” (inactive) or “closed” (active) state, we performed fluorescence lifetime measurements in both invasive mutant p53R172H and noninvasive p53fl PDAC cells expressing both the dominant negative (T19N) and constitutively active (Q63L) versions of the probe (4). Transient overexpression, in both PDAC cell lines, of the T19N mutant which reduces the affinity of the probe to guanine nucleotides, resulted in a maximum inactive lifetime of 2.2 to 2.3 nanoseconds (Fig. 1B). In contrast, transient overexpression of the Q63L GTPase-deficient mutant probe resulted in a maximum active lifetime of 1.7 to 1.8 nanoseconds in both PDAC cell lines (Fig. 1B).

To assess the range of fluorescence lifetime of the probe with known biochemical inactivation or activation, we serum-starved cells for 48 hours to reduce RhoA activity and subjected cells to biochemical stimulation (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Low, basal RhoA activity is represented in the lifetime color maps with red/yellow colors, whereas high RhoA activity is represented as blue colors and areas with a low signal-to-noise ratio in which a lifetime measurement cannot be achieved are black. Stimulation with known RhoA activators, such as lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) or calpeptin, significantly activated the probe globally giving an average lifetime of approximately 1.8 and 1.9 nanoseconds, respectively (see Supplementary Fig. 1A–C with accompanying lifetime color maps and Rhotekin pull-down assay), whereas addition of cell-permeable C3 transferase resulted in the probe remaining in the inactive state (see Supplementary Fig. 1A; refs. 1, 36). Finally, in line with this, overexpression of a constitutively active RhoGEF, onco-Lbc (37), also significantly activated the RhoA reporter globally within the cell resulting in an average lifetime of 1.7 to 1.8 nanoseconds (see Supplementary Fig. 1A).

To assess whether fluorescence lifetime imaging could be used to rapidly and accurately detect subtle changes in RhoA activity, invasive mutant p53R172H PDAC cells were initially subjected to wound heal assays in which the activity of RhoA in individual cells at the leading edge of the wound was compared with confluent cells at the rear within different time frames. At early time points after wounding, small subpopulations of cells proximal to the wound edge showed significant activation of RhoA activity, as determined by low fluorescence lifetime measurements resulting from FRET of the RhoA reporter (Fig. 1C, white arrows indicate active cells with a fluorescence lifetime of approximately 1.8–1.9 nanoseconds that appear blue on the lifetime color map). In contrast, cells at the rear of the wound had a low basal level of activity (Fig. 1D, red arrows and quantified in Fig. 1E). Importantly, using a Rhotekin-based RhoA-GTP pull-down assay, the difference in RhoA regulation at the wound edge could not be detected when only one scratch wound was performed (Fig. 1F). Only when multiple wounds were performed was the activation of RhoA apparent in the Rhotekin-based pull-down assay (Fig. 1F), demonstrating the advantages of single-cell fluorescence lifetime imaging over standard biochemical techniques in which these effects may be masked.

The specific activation of RhoA in cells at the wound edge suggests that a gradient of RhoA activity may exist within the local environment of migrating tumors. In line with this, differential activity or expression of key proteins at the invasive edge of tumors, or in “hot spots” within a tumor population in vivo, have previously been demonstrated using immunohistochemical staining of fixed tumor sections (32, 38). Consistent with this, using FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching) or photoactivation, we have recently demonstrated in vivo that E-cadherin–based junctions and plasma membrane dynamics, both of which play vital roles in invasion, are also locally regulated by different environmental cues within the tumor cell population (39). Using FLIM-FRET to assess protein behavior in individual cells, within living animals, during invasion would, therefore, provide a more detailed understanding of cell activity during this process and may ultimately contribute to the development of novel, targeted anti-invasive drug therapies.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity during three-dimensional organotypic pancreatic cancer invasion

Invasion in complex 3-dimensional matrices that mimic in vivo conditions, such as organotypic assays, has revealed distinct modes of cell locomotion adopted by cancer cells that are governed by both the surrounding stromal cells and the density and topography of the extracellular matrix (40, 41). To determine whether RhoA plays a role in mutant p53R172H-driven pancreatic cancer cell invasion (23, 27, 28), we examined PDAC cell invasion in a 3-dimensional organotypic model. We established organotypic cultures of primary human fibroblasts and rat tail fibrillar collagen I (33, 40), which when exposed to an air–liquid interface creates a chemotactic gradient that induces invasion of overlayed cancer cells (see Supplementary Movie 2, cancer cells in green invading over fibroblasts in red). The invasion of mutant p53R172H or p53fl PDAC cells was assessed over an 8- to 12-day period, in combination with multiphoton-based second harmonic imaging of the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM; see Supplementary Movies 3–5, cancer cells in green, ECM appears purple). Consistent with our recent in vivo data (23), we observed that mutant p53R172H PDAC cells degrade and collectively invade into the matrix, whereas p53fl PDAC cells remained on top of the matrix surface (Fig. 2A and B). Quantification of the percentage of total PDAC cells in the organotypic assay that invade beyond 30 μm as a ratio of cells on top by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining confirmed that expression of mutant p53R172H confers the capacity for PDAC cells to invade over time, whereas p53fl cells do not invade (Fig. 2C). Importantly, inhibition of ROCK, the downstream effector of RhoA, using the inhibitor Y27632 significantly reduced the invasion of mutant p53R172H PDAC cells in the organotypic assay at both 8 and 12 days of invasion (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. 6). Similar results were observed upon treatment with cell-permeable C3 transferase, suggesting that activation of the RhoA pathway plays a critical role in pancreatic cancer cell invasion (Fig. 2C). A similar induction of invasion was observed when the human equivalent of murine p53R172H (p53R175H) was expressed in p53 null PDAC cells (Fig. 2D and E and quantified in 2F).

Figure 2.

RhoA activity is required for PDAC invasion. A and B, H&E-stained sections of p53fl and p53R172H cells on organotypic matrix. C, quantification of p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cell invasion ± Y27632 or cell-permeable C3 in the organotypic matrix at 8 and 12 days. D and E, H&E-stained sections of p53fl cells expressing vector or human mutant p53R175H cultured on organotypic matrix. Quantification of human mutant p53R175H-driven PDAC invasion in the organotypic matrix at 8 days. Red arrows depict examples of cells assessed at depth for Figure 3C. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Figure 2.

RhoA activity is required for PDAC invasion. A and B, H&E-stained sections of p53fl and p53R172H cells on organotypic matrix. C, quantification of p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cell invasion ± Y27632 or cell-permeable C3 in the organotypic matrix at 8 and 12 days. D and E, H&E-stained sections of p53fl cells expressing vector or human mutant p53R175H cultured on organotypic matrix. Quantification of human mutant p53R175H-driven PDAC invasion in the organotypic matrix at 8 days. Red arrows depict examples of cells assessed at depth for Figure 3C. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Close modal

To specifically investigate a role for RhoA during invasion, we accurately measured RhoA activity using FLIM-FRET at day 0 and day 8 of organotypic invasion. Fluorescence lifetime imaging of p53fl cells on the matrix surface revealed a weak basal activity of RhoA at day zero (Fig. 3D, column 1) and when exposed to a chemotactic gradient for 8 days, failed to activate RhoA above basal levels (Fig. 3A and quantified in 3D, column 2), correlating with the absence of cell invasion (Fig. 2A). Similarly, over a longer time course of up to 21 days (see Supplementary Fig. 7), these cells did not invade, consistent with in vivo data (23). In contrast, fluorescence lifetime imaging of mutant p53R172H PDAC cells on the matrix surface revealed an initial weak basal activity of RhoA at day zero (Fig. 3D, column 3); however, when exposed to a chemotactic gradient for 8 days, cells on the matrix surface exhibit significant RhoA activation (Fig. 3B and quantified in 3D, column 4).

Figure 3.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity during invasion. A–C, representative fluorescence images of p53fl and p53R172H cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) on the matrix surface or during invasion with corresponding lifetime map of RhoA activity. D, quantification of lifetime measurements of RhoA activity at 0 (dashed columns) and 8 days for cells on and within the matrix surface for both p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cells, respectively. E, percentage of p53R172H PDAC cells demonstrating distinct RhoA activity at the poles of cells within the 3-dimensional matrix. White arrow demonstrates distinct RhoA activity at the pole of the cell. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Figure 3.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity during invasion. A–C, representative fluorescence images of p53fl and p53R172H cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) on the matrix surface or during invasion with corresponding lifetime map of RhoA activity. D, quantification of lifetime measurements of RhoA activity at 0 (dashed columns) and 8 days for cells on and within the matrix surface for both p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cells, respectively. E, percentage of p53R172H PDAC cells demonstrating distinct RhoA activity at the poles of cells within the 3-dimensional matrix. White arrow demonstrates distinct RhoA activity at the pole of the cell. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Close modal

Multiphoton-based FLIM-FRET provides the potential to image RhoA activity at greater penetration depths (42); however, previous detection efficiencies have been a limiting factor in the use of FLIM-FRET for 3-dimensional investigations. To overcome this limitation, we have utilized a multichannel TCSPC PMT as a nondescanned detector (see the Materials and Methods section) allowing for accurate detection and measurement of fluorescence lifetimes at a depth of approximately 150 μm within an organotypic matrix (Fig. 2B, red arrows depict examples of cells analyzed by FLIM-FRET at depth). Analysis of RhoA activity up to 150 μm within the matrix (Fig. 3C), demonstrated that actively invading mutant p53R172H cells have an enhanced average activity of RhoA compared with those present on the matrix surface (quantified in Fig. 3D, column 5). A similar increase in RhoA activity at approximately 150 μm was also observed over a longer time course of up to 12 days of invasion (see Supplementary Fig. 8).

Interestingly, in the majority of invading mutant p53R172H cells, we observed a discrete fraction of active RhoA at the pole of the cells (Fig. 3C, white arrow and quantified in 3E). Significantly, we did not observe this subcellular spatial regulation of RhoA activity within cells in 2-dimensional culture at the rear or front of migrating cells (Fig. 1C and D). This suggests that in a 3-dimensional context, RhoA may be spatially regulated at the poles of mutant p53R172H cells to drive protrusion.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging of RhoA activity in a live animal microenvironment

Our ability to use fluorescence lifetime imaging at depth to assess RhoA activity in 3 dimensions and the added contextual detail this provides prompted us to investigate whether we can assess RhoA activity under more native physiologic conditions in live animals. Imaging invasion in a live animal setting is inherently difficult due to sample instability, autofluorescence, poor tissue penetration, and light scattering (40, 43, 44). Recent advances in multiphoton microscopy as described here, however, have improved both the resolution and imaging depth thereby providing a powerful tool for directly observing key events in the invasive and metastatic process in situ. PDAC cells were therefore grown as subcutaneous tumors in nude mice and the ability of multiphoton-based FLIM to measure activity of the RhoA reporter within tumor tissue was examined (see the Materials and Methods section). The added sensitivity of a multichannel TCSPC PMT detector allowed us to detect the activity of RhoA up to approximately 150 μm within solid tumor tissue, allowing cells completely surrounded by ECM, stroma, and vasculature to be readily assessed in vivo.

The fluorescence lifetime of the RhoA reporter in PDAC cells was quantified in vivo at different sites within the tumor. Consistent with our data showing that loss, as compared with mutation, of p53 in the pancreatic mouse model results in noninvasive PDAC cells (Supplementary Fig. 9 and ref. 23), we observed low RhoA activity in p53fl cells in vivo (Fig. 4A). In contrast, we found a geometrically distinct subcellular fraction of active RhoA at the poles of invasive mutant p53R172H PDAC cells in vivo (Fig. 4B, white arrows and inset compared with Fig. 4A, white arrows and inset). Quantification of the subcellular distribution within the cell body and poles confirmed that the spatial regulation of RhoA activity was only exhibited by invasive mutant p53R172H PDAC cells and not p53fl cells (Fig. 4C). This result suggests that the fraction of active RhoA at the poles of cells in vivo may contribute to invasion. This observation is consistent with recent work in zebra fish, by Kardash and colleagues, where RhoA was shown to drive protrusion in polarized germ cells at the leading edge during embryonic development (9).

Figure 4.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity in live animals. A and B, representative in vivo fluorescence images of p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) with corresponding in vivo lifetime map of RhoA activity, respectively. C, quantification of lifetime measurements of RhoA activity within the cell body or poles of p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cells in live animals as indicated. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Figure 4.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity in live animals. A and B, representative in vivo fluorescence images of p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) with corresponding in vivo lifetime map of RhoA activity, respectively. C, quantification of lifetime measurements of RhoA activity within the cell body or poles of p53fl and p53R172H PDAC cells in live animals as indicated. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Close modal

In vivo spatial regulation of RhoA activity in invasive mutant p53R172H PDAC cells upon treatment with the anti-invasive drug, dasatinib

Using a genetically engineered GFP pancreatic cancer model Pdxl-Cre-GFP, LSL-KRasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+ to image invasion and metastasis in vivo (32), we have recently shown that therapeutic intervention with dasatinib, a clinically approved anti-invasive Src inhibitor, significantly impairs metastatic burden in these mice (32). This, together with previous work by our group showing the reciprocal relationship between RhoGTPases and Src kinase activity during polarized cell motility (45) prompted us to assess the effect of dasatinib treatment on RhoA activity in the invasive mutant p53 PDACs both in organotypic assays and in live animals. Dasatinib treatment in the organotypic assay significantly reduced both murine p53R172H and human p53R175H-driven PDAC cell invasion (Fig. 5A and B), consistent with our previous finding in vivo (32). We therefore went on to investigate the effect of dasatinib on invasive mutant p53R172H PDACs in a live animal setting. Mice bearing subcutaneous PDAC tumors were treated with 10 mg/kg of dasatinib (32, 39) for 3 days prior to fluorescence lifetime imaging of RhoA activity in conjunction with second harmonic imaging of the host ECM (Fig. 6A and C shows cells in green and ECM by second harmonic imaging in purple; Supplementary Fig. 10 shows dasatinib-mediated inhibition of Src activity in vivo by immunoblotting). Strikingly, although the polarized and protrusive morphology of mutant p53R172H PDAC cells remained present upon dasatinib treatment (compare green fluorescence images in Fig. 6A and C, white arrows), the subcellular pool of RhoA activity at the front and rear of cells, as determined using FLIM, was inactivated (compare fluorescence lifetime images Fig. 6B and D, white arrows and insets). Quantification confirmed that while basal RhoA activity within the cell body of mutant p53R172H PDAC cells was not affected, dasatinib treatment specifically inactivated RhoA activity at the poles of cells in vivo (Fig. 6E). Whether this polar RhoA activity is driving contraction, protrusion or both in vivo is currently unknown. This, however, could be addressed in the future by simultaneously imaging protrusion and contraction in live animals with real-time FLIM-FRET (5, 11). Moreover, it is also possible that this spatially localized inhibition may affect cell adhesion/interaction with the surrounding ECM components in vivo as both impairment of RhoA and Src have previously been shown to play key roles in adhesion dynamics (1, 8, 45, 46). This could, therefore, partially explain the reduced invasive and metastatic efficiency found in dasatinib-treated mice and therefore warrants further investigation in the future (32).

Figure 5.

Dasatinib inhibits mutant p53-driven PDAC cell invasion. A and B, H&E-stained sections and quantification of mutant p53R172H or p53R175H -driven PDAC cell invasion ± dasatinib in the organotypic matrix at 8 to 12 days. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Figure 5.

Dasatinib inhibits mutant p53-driven PDAC cell invasion. A and B, H&E-stained sections and quantification of mutant p53R172H or p53R175H -driven PDAC cell invasion ± dasatinib in the organotypic matrix at 8 to 12 days. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Close modal
Figure 6.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity in invasive p53R172H PDAC cells upon dasatinib treatment in vivo. A and C, representative in vivo fluorescence images of mutant p53R172H PDAC cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) with SHG signal from host ECM components (purple). B and D, corresponding in vivo lifetime maps demonstrating the presence and absence of RhoA activity in subcellular polar regions of cells ± dasatinib, respectively. E, quantification of fluorescence lifetime measurements of RhoA activity within the cell body or poles of p53R172H cells ± dasatinib. F, distribution of active and inactive polar regions in p53R172H PDAC cells within the tumor tissue ± dasatinib. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Figure 6.

Spatial regulation of RhoA activity in invasive p53R172H PDAC cells upon dasatinib treatment in vivo. A and C, representative in vivo fluorescence images of mutant p53R172H PDAC cells expressing the Raichu-RhoA reporter (green) with SHG signal from host ECM components (purple). B and D, corresponding in vivo lifetime maps demonstrating the presence and absence of RhoA activity in subcellular polar regions of cells ± dasatinib, respectively. E, quantification of fluorescence lifetime measurements of RhoA activity within the cell body or poles of p53R172H cells ± dasatinib. F, distribution of active and inactive polar regions in p53R172H PDAC cells within the tumor tissue ± dasatinib. Columns, mean; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01.

Close modal

As we have shown, fluorescence lifetime imaging allows the differential regulation of protein activity within a tumor cell population to be individually assessed (Fig. 1). Consistent with this, we find that not all cells in vivo treated with dasatinib are inactive (Fig. 6F). Approximately 80% of mutant p53R172H cells, examined using FLIM, exhibited RhoA activity in control mice, and upon dasatinib treatment, we observe that approximately 20% of cells remain active within the tumors, independent of drug treatment (Fig. 6F). This is likely to be due to critical differences within the solid tumor cell mass, for example due to poor vasculature or limited perfusion and access of the drug to key areas of the tumor (47). In this regard, recent exciting work has addressed the role tumor-associated matrix and stromal tissue plays in pancreatic cancer drug delivery (48). Using the mutant p53R172H mouse model described here, combination therapy to deplete tumor-associated matrix and improve vasculature using the Hedgehog inhibitor IPI-926 was shown to improve the delivery and efficacy of chemotherapeutic drug treatment to solid tumors (48). As the small fraction of active cells that we observe may progress and form micrometastases after initial therapeutic intervention and/or tumor resection, it would be beneficial to pinpoint areas of poor drug delivery within different tumor microenvironments using FLIM-FRET in the future.

The adaptation of 2-dimensional fluorescence techniques for intravital imaging has resulted in a new era of context-dependent in vivo imaging, providing a greater picture of key biological events in situ (39, 42, 43, 49). Here, we have demonstrated the first use of FLIM-FRET to monitor molecular dynamics of RhoA in tumors upon therapeutic intervention. In doing so, we have specifically isolated at a subcellular level a small yet important pool of RhoA, not observed in vitro, that is sensitive to drug treatment and correlates with invasion. These differences have implications for cancer research, in which the behavior of key molecules associated with motility, invasion, and metastasis in vitro are used to reveal basic biological mechanisms which are then extrapolated back into the human disease (39, 50). Such detailed topological analysis in vivo enables the detection of subtle changes in protein activity following therapeutic interventions that are intractable to in vitro assessment and could improve the current high attrition rate of compounds entering clinical trials in the future (50).

The distinct subcellular regulation of RhoA at the poles of invading cells observed here sets a precedent that other key RhoGTPases or proteins involved in invasion may also be tightly regulated in such a manner in vivo. The use of this technique for the assessment of other prototypical Rho family GTPases, including Rac and Cdc42, could therefore provide insight into their coordinated regulation in vivo not only during invasion and metastasis but also in the context of other biological processes such as transformation, cell-cycle progression, transcriptional activation, and response to drug treatment (1, 15, 45). Also, as described earlier, Rho GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs act as integrated upstream “molecular switches”, critical for control of RhoGTPases, and are commonly mutated or aberrantly regulated in many cancer types including the pancreas (8). The use of FLIM to measure FRET reporters, in conjunction with the assessment of altered Rho-signaling components, could allow us to investigate whether global or site-specific deregulation of RhoGTPase activity contributes to these cancer types.

Finally, we and others have recently shown that mutant p53 drives invasion and metastasis in pancreatic, colon, lung, and breast cancer (24, 25) and that altered regulation of cell–ECM interactions via integrins seems to play a central role in driving invasion (24). As RhoA is involved in integrin inside-out and outside-in signaling (46), investigation of RhoA activity in these mutant p53-driven cancers should provide a new level of detail regarding the regulation of RhoA during cell–ECM interactions in the course of invasion in vivo as a potential effector of mutant p53.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

The authors thank Drs. Haley Bennett, John Dawson, and Shereen Kadir, Derek Miller, Tom Hamilton, Margaret O'Prey, Tom Gilbey, and David Strachan.

P. Timpson was supported by a fellowship from AstraZeneca; E.J. McGhee, J.P. Morton, A. von Kriegsheim, J.P. Schwarz, S.A. Karim, B. Doyle, M.F. Olson, O.J. Sansom, and K.I. Anderson supported by a Cancer Research UK core grant. V.G. Brunton and M.C. Frame by Cancer Research UK program grant C157/A9148.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Nobes
CD
,
Hall
A
. 
Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia
.
Cell
1995
;
81
:
53
62
.
2.
Ridley
AJ
,
Hall
A
. 
The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors
.
Cell
1992
;
70
:
389
99
.
3.
Ridley
AJ
,
Paterson
HF
,
Johnston
CL
,
Diekmann
D
,
Hall
A
. 
The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling
.
Cell
1992
;
70
:
401
10
.
4.
Yoshizaki
H
,
Ohba
Y
,
Kurokawa
K
,
Itoh
RE
,
Nakamura
T
,
Mochizuki
N
, et al
Activity of Rho-family GTPases during cell division as visualized with FRET-based probes
.
J Cell Biol
2003
;
162
:
223
32
.
5.
Pertz
O
,
Hodgson
L
,
Klemke
RL
,
Hahn
KM
. 
Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells
.
Nature
2006
;
440
:
1069
72
.
6.
Kraynov
VS
,
Chamberlain
C
,
Bokoch
GM
,
Schwartz
MA
,
Slabaugh
S
,
Hahn
KM
. 
Localized Rac activation dynamics visualized in living cells
.
Science
2000
;
290
:
333
7
.
7.
Nalbant
P
,
Hodgson
L
,
Kraynov
V
,
Toutchkine
A
,
Hahn
KM
. 
Activation of endogenous Cdc42 visualized in living cells
.
Science
2004
;
305
:
1615
9
.
8.
Malliri
A
,
Collard
JG
. 
Role of Rho-family proteins in cell adhesion and cancer
.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2003
;
15
:
583
9
.
9.
Kardash
E
,
Reichman-Fried
M
,
Maitre
JL
,
Boldajipour
B
,
Papusheva
E
,
Messerschmidt
EM
, et al
A role for Rho GTPases and cell-cell adhesion in single-cell motility in vivo
.
Nat Cell Biol
2010
;
12
:
47
53
;
Suppl 1–11
.
10.
Kurokawa
K
,
Matsuda
M
. 
Localized RhoA activation as a requirement for the induction of membrane ruffling
.
Mol Biol Cell
2005
;
16
:
4294
303
.
11.
Machacek
M
,
Hodgson
L
,
Welch
C
,
Elliott
H
,
Pertz
O
,
Nalbant
P
, et al
Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion
.
Nature
2009
;
461
:
99
103
.
12.
Wu
YI
,
Frey
D
,
Lungu
OI
,
Jaehrig
A
,
Schlichting
I
,
Kuhlman
B
, et al
A genetically encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells
.
Nature
2009
;
461
:
104
8
.
13.
Fingleton
B
. 
Molecular targets in metastasis: lessons from genomic approaches
.
Cancer Genomics Proteomics
2007
;
4
:
211
21
.
14.
Narumiya
S
,
Tanji
M
,
Ishizaki
T
. 
Rho signaling, ROCK and mDia1, in transformation, metastasis and invasion
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2009
;
28
:
65
76
.
15.
Chan
CH
,
Lee
SW
,
Li
CF
,
Wang
J
,
Yang
WL
,
Wu
CY
, et al
Deciphering the transcriptional complex critical for RhoA gene expression and cancer metastasis
.
Nat Cell Biol
2010
;
12
:
457
67
.
16.
Warshaw
AL
,
Fernandez-del Castillo
C
. 
Pancreatic carcinoma
.
N Engl J Med
1992
;
326
:
455
65
.
17.
Jensen
OM
,
Esteve
J
,
Moller
H
,
Renard
H
. 
Cancer in the European Community and its member states
.
Eur J Cancer
1990
;
26
:
1167
256
.
18.
Almoguera
C
,
Shibata
D
,
Forrester
K
,
Martin
J
,
Arnheim
N
,
Perucho
M
. 
Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes
.
Cell
1988
;
53
:
549
54
.
19.
Aguirre
AJ
,
Bardeesy
N
,
Sinha
M
,
Lopez
L
,
Tuveson
DA
,
Horner
J
, et al
Activated Kras and Ink4a/Arf deficiency cooperate to produce metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
.
Genes Dev
2003
;
17
:
3112
26
.
20.
Hingorani
SR
,
Petricoin
EF
,
Maitra
A
,
Rajapakse
V
,
King
C
,
Jacobetz
MA
, et al
Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse
.
Cancer Cell
2003
;
4
:
437
50
.
21.
Scarpa
A
,
Capelli
P
,
Mukai
K
,
Zamboni
G
,
Oda
T
,
Iacono
C
, et al
Pancreatic adenocarcinomas frequently show p53 gene mutations
.
Am J Pathol
1993
;
142
:
1534
43
.
22.
Hingorani
SR
,
Wang
L
,
Multani
AS
,
Combs
C
,
Deramaudt
TB
,
Hruban
RH
, et al
Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice
.
Cancer Cell
2005
;
7
:
469
83
.
23.
Morton
JP
,
Timpson
P
,
Karim
SA
,
Ridgway
RA
,
Athineos
D
,
Doyle
B
, et al
Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2009
;
107
:
246
51
.
24.
Muller
PA
,
Caswell
PT
,
Doyle
B
,
Iwanicki
MP
,
Tan
EH
,
Karim
S
, et al
Mutant p53 drives invasion by promoting integrin recycling
.
Cell
2009
;
139
:
1327
41
.
25.
Adorno
M
,
Cordenonsi
M
,
Montagner
M
,
Dupont
S
,
Wong
C
,
Hann
B
, et al
A Mutant-p53/Smad complex opposes p63 to empower TGFbeta-induced metastasis
.
Cell
2009
;
137
:
87
98
.
26.
Xia
M
,
Land
H
. 
Tumor suppressor p53 restricts Ras stimulation of RhoA and cancer cell motility
.
Nat Struct Mol Biol
2007
;
14
:
215
23
.
27.
Mizuarai
S
,
Yamanaka
K
,
Kotani
H
. 
Mutant p53 induces the GEF-H1 oncogene, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor-H1 for RhoA, resulting in accelerated cell proliferation in tumor cells
.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
6319
26
.
28.
Nalbant
P
,
Chang
YC
,
Birkenfeld
J
,
Chang
ZF
,
Bokoch
GM
. 
Guanine nucleotide exchange factor-H1 regulates cell migration via localized activation of RhoA at the leading edge
.
Mol Biol Cell
2009
;
20
:
4070
82
.
29.
Olive
KP
,
Tuveson
DA
. 
The use of targeted mouse models for preclinical testing of novel cancer therapeutics
.
Clin Cancer Res
2006
;
12
:
5277
87
.
30.
Hruban
RH
,
Adsay
NV
,
Albores-Saavedra
J
,
Anver
MR
,
Biankin
AV
,
Boivin
GP
, et al
Pathology of genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic exocrine cancer: consensus report and recommendations
.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
95
106
.
31.
Carlin
LM
,
Makrogianneli
K
,
Keppler
M
,
Fruhwirth
GO
,
Ng
T
. 
Visualisation of signalling in immune cells
.
Methods Mol Biol
2010
;
616
:
97
113
.
32.
Morton
JP
,
Karim
SA
,
Graham
K
,
Timpson
P
,
Jamieson
N
,
Athineos
D
, et al
Dasatinib inhibits the development of metastases in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
.
Gastroenterology
2010
;
139
:
292
303
.
33.
Edward
M
,
Gillan
C
,
Micha
D
,
Tammi
RH
. 
Tumour regulation of fibroblast hyaluronan expression: a mechanism to facilitate tumour growth and invasion
.
Carcinogenesis
2005
;
26
:
1215
23
.
34.
Dehmelt
L
,
Bastiaens
PI
. 
Spatial organization of intracellular communication: insights from imaging
.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2010
;
11
:
440
52
.
35.
Festy
F
,
Ameer-Beg
SM
,
Ng
T
,
Suhling
K
. 
Imaging proteins in vivo using fluorescence lifetime microscopy
.
Mol Biosyst
2007
;
3
:
381
91
.
36.
Schoenwaelder
SM
,
Burridge
K
. 
Evidence for a calpeptin-sensitive protein-tyrosine phosphatase upstream of the small GTPase Rho. A novel role for the calpain inhibitor calpeptin in the inhibition of protein-tyrosine phosphatases
.
J Biol Chem
1999
;
274
:
14359
67
.
37.
Olson
MF
,
Sterpetti
P
,
Nagata
K
,
Toksoz
D
,
Hall
A
. 
Distinct roles for DH and PH domains in the Lbc oncogene
.
Oncogene
1997
;
15
:
2827
31
.
38.
Tlsty
TD
,
Coussens
LM
. 
Tumor stroma and regulation of cancer development
.
Annu Rev Pathol
2006
;
1
:
119
50
.
39.
Serrels
A
,
Timpson
P
,
Canel
M
,
Schwarz
JP
,
Carragher
NO
,
Frame
MC
, et al
Real-time study of E-cadherin and membrane dynamics in living animals: implications for disease modeling and drug development
.
Cancer Res
2009
;
69
:
2714
9
.
40.
Gaggioli
C
,
Hooper
S
,
Hidalgo-Carcedo
C
,
Grosse
R
,
Marshall
JF
,
Harrington
K
, et al
Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells
.
Nat Cell Biol
2007
;
9
:
1392
400
.
41.
Wolf
K
,
Wu
YI
,
Liu
Y
,
Geiger
J
,
Tam
E
,
Overall
C
, et al
Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion
.
Nat Cell Biol
2007
;
9
:
893
904
.
42.
Weissleder
R
,
Pittet
MJ
. 
Imaging in the era of molecular oncology
.
Nature
2008
;
452
:
580
9
.
43.
Condeelis
J
,
Segall
JE
. 
Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
921
30
.
44.
Hoffman
RM
. 
Recent advances on in vivo imaging with fluorescent proteins
.
Methods Cell Biol
2008
;
85
:
485
95
.
45.
Timpson
P
,
Jones
GE
,
Frame
MC
,
Brunton
VG
. 
Coordination of cell polarization and migration by the Rho family GTPases requires Src tyrosine kinase activity
.
Curr Biol
2001
;
11
:
1836
46
.
46.
Ginsberg
MH
,
Partridge
A
,
Shattil
SJ
. 
Integrin regulation
.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2005
;
17
:
509
16
.
47.
Tredan
O
,
Galmarini
CM
,
Patel
K
,
Tannock
IF
. 
Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2007
;
99
:
1441
54
.
48.
Olive
KP
,
Jacobetz
MA
,
Davidson
CJ
,
Gopinathan
A
,
McIntyre
D
,
Honess
D
, et al
Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer
.
Science
2009
;
324
:
1457
61
.
49.
Timpson
P
,
Serrels
A
,
Canel
M
,
Frame
MC
,
Brunton
VG
,
Anderson
KI
. 
Quantitative real-time imaging of molecular dynamics during cancer cell invasion and metastasis in vivo
.
Cell Adh Migr
2009
;
3
:
351
4
.
50.
Kamb
A
. 
What's wrong with our cancer models?
Nat Rev Drug Discov
2005
;
4
:
161
5
.