Resveratrol is a phytochemical with chemopreventive activity in preclinical rodent models of colorectal carcinogenesis. Antiproliferation is one of the many chemopreventive modes of action it has been shown to engage in. Concentrations of resveratrol, which can be achieved in human tissues after p.o. administration, have not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to measure concentrations of resveratrol and its metabolites in the colorectal tissue of humans who ingested resveratrol. Twenty patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer consumed eight daily doses of resveratrol at 0.5 or 1.0 g before surgical resection. Resveratrol was found to be well tolerated. Normal and malignant biopsy tissue samples were obtained before dosing. Parent compound plus its metabolites resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide, resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide, resveratrol-3-O-sulfate, resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate, resveratrol sulfate glucuronide, and resveratrol disulfate were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV or mass spectrometric detection in colorectal resection tissue. Quantitation was achieved by HPLC/UV. Cell proliferation, as reflected by Ki-67 staining, was compared in preintervention and postintervention tissue samples. Resveratrol and resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide were recovered from tissues at maximal mean concentrations of 674 and 86.0 nmol/g, respectively. Levels of resveratrol and its metabolites were consistently higher in tissues originating in the right side of the colon compared with the left. Consumption of resveratrol reduced tumor cell proliferation by 5% (P = 0.05). The results suggest that daily p.o. doses of resveratrol at 0.5 or 1.0 g produce levels in the human gastrointestinal tract of an order of magnitude sufficient to elicit anticarcinogenic effects. Resveratrol merits further clinical evaluation as a potential colorectal cancer chemopreventive agent. Cancer Res; 70(19); 7392–9. ©2010 AACR.

Resveratrol (trans-3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene) is a polyphenolic phytochemical contained in grapes, peanuts, and mulberries, which has been shown to prevent malignancies in a variety of target tissues in preclinical models, prominently the colorectum (1). Resveratrol ameliorated formation of aberrant crypt foci and/or adenocarcinoma incidence in the colon of rats, which had been exposed to the carcinogens azoxymethane or N,N-dimethylhydrazine (24). It interfered with adenoma development in the ApcMin mouse, a model of colorectal malignancies associated with an Apc mutation (5, 6). Resveratrol also inhibited colorectal inflammation and carcinogenesis in a murine model of ulcerative colitis (7). These promising preclinical results, together with safety concerns associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs such as aspirin and selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors in colorectal cancer chemoprevention (8, 9), support consideration of resveratrol for clinical development as a colorectal cancer chemopreventive agent. A recent pilot study of resveratrol at repeated daily doses of up to 5 g for 29 days in healthy volunteers showed that it is safe, although at the 2.5-g and 5-g dose levels, it caused reversible diarrhea in some individuals.5

5Submitted for publication.

In an earlier pharmacokinetic pilot study, consumption of a single dose of resveratrol at 5.0 g, the highest dose used, generated average peak plasma concentrations of 2.4 nmol/mL (10), not dramatically below levels at which resveratrol elicits biochemical effects relevant to cancer chemoprevention in cells in vitro (∼10 nmol/mL; ref. 1). Levels of metabolic resveratrol conjugates exceeded those of parent agent by up to almost 6-fold, consistent with the poor systemic availability of resveratrol (10). The bioavailability of resveratrol administered either as single agent (1014) or as integral constituent of a dietary mixture (11, 1517) has been the focus of several recent clinical studies. However, it is not known whether consumption of resveratrol by humans can achieve target organ concentrations commensurate with pharmacologic activity observed in preclinical models. Such knowledge is essential to optimize the design of future intervention studies aimed at preventing malignancies.

Prominent among the many modes of action by which resveratrol is considered to exert its chemopreventive efficacy is inhibition of proliferation of preneoplastic or malignant cells (18). In the light of the current interest in resveratrol as a potential colorectal cancer preventive agent, we wished to measure levels of resveratrol and its metabolites in the human colorectum to help define doses that may be used in future colorectal cancer chemoprevention intervention studies of this agent. In addition, we wanted to determine plasma levels of resveratrol and/or its metabolites that accompany those measured in the colorectum. To achieve these aims, patients with confirmed colorectal cancer, who were to undergo surgical resection of their malignancy, received resveratrol at 0.5 or 1 g daily for 8 days before surgery. Concentrations of parent agent and metabolites were determined in surgically removed tissue and plasma. Finally, the hypothesis that the consumption of resveratrol at these doses may be associated with an antiproliferative effect in the target tissue was tested. To that end, colorectal cell proliferation reflected by immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 was compared in tumor tissue obtained by endoscopy before intervention and during surgical resection.

Patients

The study was approved by Nottingham UK Research Ethics Committee. Twenty patients with resectable colorectal cancer were recruited into the study at the University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom. Patients met the following eligibility criteria: histological diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, disease amenable to surgical resection; age, >18 years; WHO performance status, 0 to 2; hemoglobin, >10 g/dL; alanine aminotransferase and serum bilirubin, <2.5× and <1.5× the upper limit of normal, respectively; creatinine, <140 μmol/L. The exclusion criteria included as follows: unfitness for general anesthesia, active peptic ulcer disease; pregnancy or lactation; excessive alcohol intake, >21 and 14 units weekly for men and women, respectively; radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatment within 28 days before enrollment, medication within 14 days of enrollment that could interfere with cell proliferation (anticoagulants including warfarin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and steroids). Patients were asked to abstain from consumption of foods and drinks containing resveratrol during the study period and gave written informed consent.

Intervention

Resveratrol was administered as uncoated, immediate release caplets containing 0.5 g of resveratrol, supplied by Pharmascience, Inc. Patients (10 per dose level) received resveratrol before surgical resection at either 0.5 or 1.0 g. The choice of dose was based on the results of a recent phase I repeat dose pharmacokinetic study of resveratrol daily doses of 0.5 to 5.0 g in healthy volunteers, in whom the 0.5-g and 1.0-g doses ingested daily for 29 days was very well tolerated.6

6Submitted for publication.

Resveratrol was taken in the evening, between the hours of 17:00 to 22:00 each day for 8 days. The last dose was administered on the evening before surgical resection. Study participants were assessed for adverse events and graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0, 2006).

Sample preparation

Blood and colorectal tissues were collected predosing at diagnostic endoscopy and postdosing at resection surgery. At endoscopy, up to 12 biopsies were collected, six each of malignant tissue and macroscopically normal tissue ∼5 to 10 cm away from the malignancy, in addition to those required for standard diagnostic purposes. The mean time periods between last dose and surgical resection or between last dose and blood collection were 18 hours (range, 15–23 hours) and 17.8 hours (range, 11–21 hours), respectively. Right-sided tumors were resected by right hemicolectomy, and left-sided tumors were resected by anterior resection or sigmoid colectomy. Resected bowel tissue was placed on ice and protected from light. One malignant tissue sample (including mucosa) and, where possible, between 2 and 6 histologically normal tissue samples were taken from each patient. Sample weight was ∼0.5 to 1.0 g. Normal tissue was taken at a distance of ∼5 and/or ∼10 cm from the proximal and distal resection margins with a similar distance to the tumor; some samples were also taken from the margins. For each patient, half the number of samples were snap-frozen and kept at −80°C until analysis, the other half were fixed in formalin for 24 hours and embedded in paraffin wax.

Venous blood was collected in lithium heparin tubes predose and at the time of resection. Tubes were chilled on ice and protected from light. Blood samples were kept on ice and centrifuged (3,000 × g, 4°C, 15 minutes); the supernatant was removed and frozen. Plasma and tissues were kept at −80°C until analysis, which was performed within 6 months.

Analysis of resveratrol and resveratrol metabolites

Frozen tissue samples were mixed with liquid nitrogen and ground and then weighed and homogenized with three parts (w/v) of HEPES buffer. Samples of tissue homogenate or plasma were extracted with methanol and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/UV as described previously (10, 19). Separation was achieved on a Waters Atlantis C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 3 μm; Waters) in combination with a Waters Atlantic C18 guard column (4.6 mm × 20 mm, 3 μm). Quantitation of resveratrol using a gradient HPLC/UV system (Waters Alliance 2695) was performed using an internal standard (naringenin) and a method that had previously been validated in terms of interday and intraday variability, recovery, accuracy, and precision. Tissue and plasma samples were extracted and analyzed in duplicate, and the mean value was used. The extraction efficiency for resveratrol from tissue homogenate was 95.2 ± 2.8% (mean ± SD, n = 7). The limit of quantitation was 175 pmol resveratrol/g tissue and 22 pmol/mL plasma, whereas the limit of detection was half of these values. Resveratrol and its metabolites in biomatrices were stable under the storage and assay conditions. As authentic resveratrol metabolites were not available in sufficient quantities as reference materials, metabolite amounts were calculated as “resveratrol equivalents,” on the assumption that recovery characteristics and relationship between peak area ratio and concentration were the same as for parent resveratrol. Authentic resveratrol-3-O-sulfate (provided by Pharmascience), resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate, resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide, and resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide became available during the course of the study by in-house synthesis, permitting HPLC peak identification, so that resveratrol metabolites could be identified by cochromatography. Metabolite identity was confirmed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) with selected reaction monitoring (SRM), operated in the negative ion mode using a Waters Alliance 2695 series HPLC with a Waters Quattro Ultima Pt triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters) under chromatographic conditions described previously (10, 19). Definitive isomer identification was not possible for resveratrol disulfate and resveratrol sulfate glucuronide.

Analysis of cell proliferation

Colorectal tumor sections, obtained preintervention and at the time of surgery, were stained for Ki-67 (mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody, Dako). Briefly, paraffin-embedded sections (4 μm) mounted on polysine-coated slides were dewaxed (65°C, 20 minutes) and hydrated through a graded series of alcohol rinses. The antigen was unmasked by microwaving sections (20 minutes) in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9). Endogenous peroxidase activity was inactivated by incubation of slides with hydrogen peroxide (3%, 10 minutes); nonspecific binding was blocked with protein block solution. Sections were incubated with primary antibody (dilution 1:2,000) overnight at 4°C. After washing (PBS) sections, the tissue-antibody reaction was visualized using a commercial kit (Dako). Representative fields were selected in biopsies and superficial regions of the resected tumor of all patients and in normal surgical specimens from five patients on the 0.5-g dose. The total number of epithelial cells and the number of positively (brown) staining epithelial cells were counted in six adjacent high-power fields (magnification, 400×; Leitz Orthoplan microscope, Leica DC 300 camera) for each sample by two independent observers. Analyses were performed blinded. Differences in counts between observers were <10%, and both recorded the same differences between cohorts. Acquisition software was Adobe Photoshop version 7. Numbers of epithelial cells counted in samples stained for Ki-67 were as follows: 1,670 ± 625 in preintervention and 1,592 ± 472 (mean ± SD, n = 21 sections) in postintervention malignant tissue and 1,343 ± 135 in preintervention and 1,666 ± 335 (n = 5 sections) in postintervention normal tissue. Values quoted under Results denote percentage of cells that stained positively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparison of results for Ki-67 immunostaining of preintervention and postintervention tissues was made either by paired Student's t test or, in the case of the normal tissue, by nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test because of the small sample size using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 13 (Windows XP). P values of 0.05 were considered to indicate significance.

Patient demographics and safety of resveratrol

The demographics of the 20 patients with confirmed colorectal cancer, who were recruited into the study, and the nature, stage, and location of their tumors are described in Table 1. One patient presented with two synchronous colorectal tumors in the sigmoid colon and cecum, which were resected during the same surgical operation. Patients ingested resveratrol at 0.5 or 1.0 g daily for 8 days before surgery. There were no resveratrol-related adverse events, and it was well tolerated at both doses.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients who were recruited into the study (A) and of their tumors (B)

A. Patient characteristics
Age (and range; years) 66.8 ± 17.2 (46–83) 
Males/females 9:11 
Caucasian/Asian 18:2 
Body mass index (and range; kg/m225.3 ± 2.68 (17.4–29.2) 
 
B. Tumor characteristics 
Location Cecum 
Hepatic flexure/transverse colon 
Sigmoid colon 10 
Rectosigmoid 
Operation Laparoscopy 
Laparotomy 13 
Resection Right hemicolectomy 
Left colectomy/sigmoid colectomy 
Anterior resection 11 
Histology Differentiation, moderate/poor 19:2 
Lymphocytic invasion/extravascular invasion 4:5 
Complete excision (R0)/incomplete excision (R1) 20:1 
Dukes staging A/B/C1 5:7:9 
A. Patient characteristics
Age (and range; years) 66.8 ± 17.2 (46–83) 
Males/females 9:11 
Caucasian/Asian 18:2 
Body mass index (and range; kg/m225.3 ± 2.68 (17.4–29.2) 
 
B. Tumor characteristics 
Location Cecum 
Hepatic flexure/transverse colon 
Sigmoid colon 10 
Rectosigmoid 
Operation Laparoscopy 
Laparotomy 13 
Resection Right hemicolectomy 
Left colectomy/sigmoid colectomy 
Anterior resection 11 
Histology Differentiation, moderate/poor 19:2 
Lymphocytic invasion/extravascular invasion 4:5 
Complete excision (R0)/incomplete excision (R1) 20:1 
Dukes staging A/B/C1 5:7:9 

NOTE: One patient presented with two colorectal tumors.

Identification of resveratrol and its metabolites in colorectal tissue

Resveratrol and its metabolites were recovered from human colorectal tissue and identified by HPLC/UV cochromatography with authentic reference material. Identity was confirmed by suitable SRM mass transitions of mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) determined by HPLC/MS/MS analysis. Figure 1A shows a representative HPLC/UV chromatogram of colorectal tissue extracts from a patient who had ingested eight doses of resveratrol, juxtaposed for comparison with a chromatogram from another patient who had discontinued intervention 7 days before bowel resection and was replaced in the study (patient choice), and no longer had detectable resveratrol species in his/her tissue. Resveratrol afforded a substantial peak in the majority of samples. The following species could be identified by cochromatography with authentic reference material and by mass spectrometry (Fig. 1B): resveratrol (m/z 227 > 184), resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide and resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (m/z 403 > 227), resveratrol-3-O-sulfate and resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (m/z 307 > 227), resveratrol disulfate (m/z 387 > 227), and resveratrol sulfate glucuronide (m/z 483 > 227; Fig. 1B). The HPLC eluent containing the latter peak was collected, and the analyte was identified by transitions of m/z 483 > 227 (loss of sulfate and glucuronide), 483 > 403 (loss of sulfate), 483 > 307 (loss of glucuronide), and 227 > 184 (characteristic transition for resveratrol). Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide was a prominent metabolite in colorectal tissue of 5 of the 10 patients on the 0.5-g dose and in 9 of the 10 patients on the 1.0-g dose. Overall, these findings contrast with results obtained previously in the plasma of healthy volunteers, in whom the amount of resveratrol recovered was relatively small compared with that of its metabolites, with resveratrol sulfate glucuronide being only a minor metabolite (10).

Figure 1.

A, HPLC/UV chromatograms of extracts of normal colon tissue resected from a patient who had received resveratrol 1.0 g daily for 8 d (solid line) and a patient who had refrained from resveratrol ingestion during the 7 d before resection (broken line). Identity of resveratrol-derived species as established by cochromatography with authentic reference material and LC/MS/MS analysis is indicated above the peaks. Insert shows structures of resveratrol and its metabolites: R1, R2 = H: resveratrol (7); R1 = sulfate R2 = H: resveratrol-3-O-sulfate (6); R1 = H, R2 = sulfate: resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (5); R1 = glucuronide, R2 = H: resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide (4); R1 = H, R2 = glucuronide: resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (2). Positions of the sulfonic and glucuronic acid moieties in resveratrol disulfate (3) and resveratrol sulfate glucuronide (1) are probably 3 and 4′, but this needs confirmation by 1H-NMR. Naringenin (8) was the internal standard. For details of tissue procurement, extraction, and chemical analysis, see Materials and Methods. B, LC/MS SRM of transitions for the identification of resveratrol metabolites in extracts of colon tissue taken from a patient who had received 0.5 g of resveratrol for 8 days. Metabolites identified were resveratrol sulfate glucuronide (m/z 483 > 227), resveratrol disulfate (m/z 387 > 227), resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide and resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (m/z 403 > 227), and resveratrol-3-O-sulfate and resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (307 > 227). Resveratrol was also identified (m/z 227 > 184). The total ion current from the analysis of a mixture of authentic standards is also shown for comparison. The mixture contained resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (1), resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide (2), dehydrated resveratrol glucuronide (exhibits the transition 385 > 227 and is not present in the patient samples) (3), resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (4), resveratrol-3-O-sulfate (5), and resveratrol (6).

Figure 1.

A, HPLC/UV chromatograms of extracts of normal colon tissue resected from a patient who had received resveratrol 1.0 g daily for 8 d (solid line) and a patient who had refrained from resveratrol ingestion during the 7 d before resection (broken line). Identity of resveratrol-derived species as established by cochromatography with authentic reference material and LC/MS/MS analysis is indicated above the peaks. Insert shows structures of resveratrol and its metabolites: R1, R2 = H: resveratrol (7); R1 = sulfate R2 = H: resveratrol-3-O-sulfate (6); R1 = H, R2 = sulfate: resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (5); R1 = glucuronide, R2 = H: resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide (4); R1 = H, R2 = glucuronide: resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (2). Positions of the sulfonic and glucuronic acid moieties in resveratrol disulfate (3) and resveratrol sulfate glucuronide (1) are probably 3 and 4′, but this needs confirmation by 1H-NMR. Naringenin (8) was the internal standard. For details of tissue procurement, extraction, and chemical analysis, see Materials and Methods. B, LC/MS SRM of transitions for the identification of resveratrol metabolites in extracts of colon tissue taken from a patient who had received 0.5 g of resveratrol for 8 days. Metabolites identified were resveratrol sulfate glucuronide (m/z 483 > 227), resveratrol disulfate (m/z 387 > 227), resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide and resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (m/z 403 > 227), and resveratrol-3-O-sulfate and resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (307 > 227). Resveratrol was also identified (m/z 227 > 184). The total ion current from the analysis of a mixture of authentic standards is also shown for comparison. The mixture contained resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide (1), resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide (2), dehydrated resveratrol glucuronide (exhibits the transition 385 > 227 and is not present in the patient samples) (3), resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate (4), resveratrol-3-O-sulfate (5), and resveratrol (6).

Close modal

Concentrations of resveratrol and its metabolites in colorectal tissue

Parent agent and five metabolites were quantitated in tumor and normal tissues from patients on resveratrol (Tables 2 and 3). Individual values varied substantially from each other, reflected by coefficients of variation in some cases exceeding 200%, both between specific tissue sites for each individual and for each site between patients. In most tissues, concentrations of resveratrol and its metabolic conjugates were higher in samples of right-sided origin (cecum, ascending colon, and hepatic flexure/transverse colon) than in those from the left side (splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum; Tables 2 and 3). Highest mean concentrations of parent resveratrol after the 0.5-g and 1.0-g doses were 18.6 and 674 nmol/g (or nmol/mL, assuming 1 mL weighs 1 g), respectively, in normal tissue localized proximal to the tumor on the right side and 8.33 and 94.1 nmol/g, respectively, in right-sided tumors. Maximal mean tissue concentrations determined for resveratrol metabolites (in nmol resveratrol equivalents/g) were 86.0 for resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide at the 0.5-g dose level and 67.2 for resveratrol-3-O-sulfate in patients on 1.0-g resveratrol, both observed in normal right-sided colorectal tissue proximal to the tumor (Tables 2 and 3, respectively). The difference in levels between left- and right-sided tumors is best illustrated in a patient bearing two colorectal tumors, in whom the concentrations of resveratrol-derived species were considerably higher in the cecal (right-sided) than the sigmoid colonic (left-sided) tumor (Fig. 2).

Table 2.

Concentrations of resveratrol and its major metabolites in normal tissue (proximal or distal to the tumor) and tumor tissue obtained from the right (cecum, ascending colon, and hepatic flexure) or left side (splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) of the colorectum in patients who received resveratrol daily for 8 d at 0.5 g

SpeciesTissue levels (nmol/g)
Proximal to tumorTumorDistal to tumor
LeftRightLeftRightLeftRight
Resveratrol 0.67 ± 0.72 (0–3.0) 18.6 ± 17.4 (0–45.9) 0.63 ± 0.69 (0–1.80) 8.33 ± 6.06 (3.1–15.0) 0.48 ± 0.47 (0–1.04) 4.94 ± 4.82 (1.95–13.5) 
Resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide loq 86.0 ± 125 (0–317) lod 0.73 ± 1.26 (0–2.18) loq 0.64 ± 0.46 (0–0.94) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide 0.17 ± 0.34(0–0.93) 7.91 ± 11.2 (0–28.2) loq 0.29 ± 0.50 (0–0.87) 0.28 ± 0.43 (0–0.99) lod 
Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide 17.1 ± 20.8 (0–61.1) 44.5 ± 47.9 (0–149) 12.8 ± 15.9 (0–34.6) 5.09 ± 7.86 (0–14.2) 20.0 ± 39.7 (0–121) lod 
Resveratrol-3-O-sulfate 0.82 ± 0.77 (0–2.84) 34.0 ± 48.6 (0.67–128) 0.44 ± 0.70 (0–1.90) 3.09 ± 2.13 (0.68–4.75) 0.94 ± 1.17 (0–3.40) 2.37 ± 0.43 (1.86–2.93) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate loq 1.21 ± 1.78 (0–4.52) 0.25 ± 0.43 (0–1.02) 0.26 ± 0.46 (0–0.79) lod 0.17 ± 0.38 (0–0.85) 
SpeciesTissue levels (nmol/g)
Proximal to tumorTumorDistal to tumor
LeftRightLeftRightLeftRight
Resveratrol 0.67 ± 0.72 (0–3.0) 18.6 ± 17.4 (0–45.9) 0.63 ± 0.69 (0–1.80) 8.33 ± 6.06 (3.1–15.0) 0.48 ± 0.47 (0–1.04) 4.94 ± 4.82 (1.95–13.5) 
Resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide loq 86.0 ± 125 (0–317) lod 0.73 ± 1.26 (0–2.18) loq 0.64 ± 0.46 (0–0.94) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide 0.17 ± 0.34(0–0.93) 7.91 ± 11.2 (0–28.2) loq 0.29 ± 0.50 (0–0.87) 0.28 ± 0.43 (0–0.99) lod 
Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide 17.1 ± 20.8 (0–61.1) 44.5 ± 47.9 (0–149) 12.8 ± 15.9 (0–34.6) 5.09 ± 7.86 (0–14.2) 20.0 ± 39.7 (0–121) lod 
Resveratrol-3-O-sulfate 0.82 ± 0.77 (0–2.84) 34.0 ± 48.6 (0.67–128) 0.44 ± 0.70 (0–1.90) 3.09 ± 2.13 (0.68–4.75) 0.94 ± 1.17 (0–3.40) 2.37 ± 0.43 (1.86–2.93) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate loq 1.21 ± 1.78 (0–4.52) 0.25 ± 0.43 (0–1.02) 0.26 ± 0.46 (0–0.79) lod 0.17 ± 0.38 (0–0.85) 

NOTE: Values are the mean ± SD of seven samples from tissues in the left side and three from the right side, with one tumor sample and between one and three normal tissue samples (proximal or distal to the tumor) per patient. Range is in brackets.

Abbreviations: loq, close to or below the limit of quantitation; lod, below the limit of detection.

Table 3.

Concentrations of resveratrol and its major metabolites in normal tissue (proximal or distal to the tumor) and tumor tissue obtained from the right (cecum, ascending colon, and hepatic flexure) or left side (splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) of the colorectum in patients who received resveratrol daily for 8 d at 1.0 g

SpeciesTissue levels (nmol/g)
Proximal to tumorTumorDistal to tumor
LeftRightLeftRightLeftRight
Resveratrol 1.21 ± 1.33 (0–5.23) 674 ± 1,303 (10.1–3,774) 2.07 ± 3.27 (0.30–8.68) 94.1 ± 89.2 (12.7–195) 2.07 ± 3.25 (0.28–9.40) 62.5 ± 76.2 (10.7–272) 
Resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide 0.19 ± 0.22 (0–0.61) 10.8 ± 17.2 (0–50.8) lod 0.75 ± 0.70 (0–1.85) 0.28 ± 0.29 (0–0.71) 0.83 ± 0.81 (0–3.24) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide 0.43 ± 0.41 (0–1.22) 1.71 ± 1.87 (0–5.31) 0.38 ± 0.47 (0–1.05) 0.53 ± 0.79 (0–1.78) 0.53 ± 0.48 (0–1.35) 0.83 ± 0.77 (0–2.37) 
Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide 19.5 ± 4.82 (10.7–27.3) 27.1 ± 21.6 (10.4–94.6) 20.7 ± 5.04 (11.7–25.4) 29.1 ± 12.8 (16.4–50.6) 25.2 ± 17.2 (4.55–51.8) 18.4 ± 5.76 (9.6–29.4) 
Resveratrol-3-O-sulfate 0.67 ± 0.56 (0–1.73) 67.2 ± 119 (3.87–366) 0.16 ± 0.39 (0–0.95) 10.4 ± 13.6 (1.80–33.4) 1.10 ± 1.21 (0–3.57) 5.82 ± 3.02 (1.59–11.9) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate lod 3.43 ± 3.36 (0.32–12.6) lod 3.09 ± 4.72 (0–11.33) loq 0.90 ± 0.70 (0–2.18) 
SpeciesTissue levels (nmol/g)
Proximal to tumorTumorDistal to tumor
LeftRightLeftRightLeftRight
Resveratrol 1.21 ± 1.33 (0–5.23) 674 ± 1,303 (10.1–3,774) 2.07 ± 3.27 (0.30–8.68) 94.1 ± 89.2 (12.7–195) 2.07 ± 3.25 (0.28–9.40) 62.5 ± 76.2 (10.7–272) 
Resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide 0.19 ± 0.22 (0–0.61) 10.8 ± 17.2 (0–50.8) lod 0.75 ± 0.70 (0–1.85) 0.28 ± 0.29 (0–0.71) 0.83 ± 0.81 (0–3.24) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide 0.43 ± 0.41 (0–1.22) 1.71 ± 1.87 (0–5.31) 0.38 ± 0.47 (0–1.05) 0.53 ± 0.79 (0–1.78) 0.53 ± 0.48 (0–1.35) 0.83 ± 0.77 (0–2.37) 
Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide 19.5 ± 4.82 (10.7–27.3) 27.1 ± 21.6 (10.4–94.6) 20.7 ± 5.04 (11.7–25.4) 29.1 ± 12.8 (16.4–50.6) 25.2 ± 17.2 (4.55–51.8) 18.4 ± 5.76 (9.6–29.4) 
Resveratrol-3-O-sulfate 0.67 ± 0.56 (0–1.73) 67.2 ± 119 (3.87–366) 0.16 ± 0.39 (0–0.95) 10.4 ± 13.6 (1.80–33.4) 1.10 ± 1.21 (0–3.57) 5.82 ± 3.02 (1.59–11.9) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate lod 3.43 ± 3.36 (0.32–12.6) lod 3.09 ± 4.72 (0–11.33) loq 0.90 ± 0.70 (0–2.18) 

NOTE: Values are the mean ± SD of six samples from tissues on the left side and five from the right side, with one tumor sample and between one and three normal tissue samples (proximal or distal to the tumor) per patient. Range is in brackets.

Abbreviations: lod, below the limit of detection; loq, close to or below the limit of quantitation.

Figure 2.

Concentrations of resveratrol and resveratrol-3-O-sulfate in normal colon and tumor tissue of a patient with a cecal (right-sided) and a sigmoid colonic (left-sided) tumor, who had received resveratrol at a dose of 1.0 g daily for 8 d. Normal tissue samples were taken at a distance of 5 cm proximal or distal from tumor and from the distal resection margin (RM). Differences in levels between the left and right side, similar to those shown here, were observed for resveratrol disulfate and the two resveratrol monoglucuronides, but not for resveratrol sulfate glucuronide.

Figure 2.

Concentrations of resveratrol and resveratrol-3-O-sulfate in normal colon and tumor tissue of a patient with a cecal (right-sided) and a sigmoid colonic (left-sided) tumor, who had received resveratrol at a dose of 1.0 g daily for 8 d. Normal tissue samples were taken at a distance of 5 cm proximal or distal from tumor and from the distal resection margin (RM). Differences in levels between the left and right side, similar to those shown here, were observed for resveratrol disulfate and the two resveratrol monoglucuronides, but not for resveratrol sulfate glucuronide.

Close modal

Concentrations of resveratrol and its metabolites in plasma

Plasma was obtained from these patients at the point of surgery and analyzed for resveratrol-derived species. Resveratrol was present at levels close to or below the limit of detection. Five resveratrol conjugates circulated at quantifiable concentrations, and these were identified by mass spectrometry as the two monoglucuronides, resveratrol-3-O-sulfate, resveratrol sulfate glucuronide, and resveratrol disulfate (Table 4). The highest mean level (22.3 nmol/mL) was observed for resveratrol sulfate glucuronide in patients on 1.0-g resveratrol.

Table 4.

Concentrations of resveratrol and its major metabolites in the plasma of patients who received resveratrol daily for 8 d at 0.5 or 1.0 g

SpeciesPlasma levels (nmol/mL)
0.5 g1.0 g
Resveratrol loq loq 
Resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide loq 0.24 ± 0.13 (0.07–0.50) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide 0.04 ± 0.06 (0–0.16) 0.24 ± 0.17 (0.05–0.57) 
Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide 13.4 ± 16.5 (0–34.9) 22.3 ± 10.1 (6.67–36.3) 
Resveratrol disulfate 0.31 ± 0.20 (0–0.59) 0.60 ± 0.81 (0.17–2.86) 
Resveratrol-3-O-sulfate 0.13 ± 0.15 (0–0.52) 0.59 ± 0.41 (0.17–1.33) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate loq loq 
SpeciesPlasma levels (nmol/mL)
0.5 g1.0 g
Resveratrol loq loq 
Resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide loq 0.24 ± 0.13 (0.07–0.50) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-glucuronide 0.04 ± 0.06 (0–0.16) 0.24 ± 0.17 (0.05–0.57) 
Resveratrol sulfate glucuronide 13.4 ± 16.5 (0–34.9) 22.3 ± 10.1 (6.67–36.3) 
Resveratrol disulfate 0.31 ± 0.20 (0–0.59) 0.60 ± 0.81 (0.17–2.86) 
Resveratrol-3-O-sulfate 0.13 ± 0.15 (0–0.52) 0.59 ± 0.41 (0.17–1.33) 
Resveratrol-4′-O-sulfate loq loq 

NOTE: Values are the mean ± SD of 10 patients per dose (and range).

Abbreviation: loq, close to or below the limit of quantitation.

Effect of resveratrol on colorectal cell proliferation

Ki-67 is a granular component of the nucleolus expressed exclusively in proliferating cells and commonly used as a surrogate marker of cell growth. Levels of Ki-67 were measured immunohistochemically in epithelial cells of biopsy and resection tissues. In all patients collectively, tumor cell Ki-67 staining was reduced from 88.0 ± 6.64% in predose biopsy samples to 83.2 ± 10.0% in postintervention surgical tissue (n = 20; P = 0.05, paired Student's t test). When the 0.5-g and 1.0-g dose groups were analyzed separately, resveratrol consumption still decreased tumor cell Ki-67 staining by 5.6% and 1.9%, respectively, albeit this reduction was not significant. Ki-67 staining was also assessed in normal tissue of five patients on the 0.5-g dose, and staining was reduced from 74.6% ± 20.6% in biopsies to 67.6% ± 15.4% in surgical tissues (P = 0.05, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test). Cursory analysis of tumor tissue before (biopsy) and after intervention (resection tissue) did not show any histopathologic differences.

The results outlined above define for the first-time concentrations of resveratrol and its metabolites in the colorectum of individuals who ingested resveratrol repeatedly. The highest mean resveratrol tissue concentrations observed (18.6 and 674 nmol/g for the 0.5-g and 1.0-g dose levels, respectively) are close to or exceed 36 nmol/g, the mean concentration of resveratrol measured in the gastrointestinal tract of ApcMin mice on resveratrol at 0.2% in the diet (6). This gastrointestinal tissue level of resveratrol accompanied reduction of ApcMin adenoma number by 27% compared with mice on control diet. Parent resveratrol accounted for a much larger proportion of total resveratrol species in colorectal tissue than in the plasma at an equivalent time point postdosing, which supports the notion that the colorectum may be a suitable target for chemoprevention by oral resveratrol. The colorectal tissue concentrations described here for resveratrol are above those achieved after repeated consumption of curcumin at 3.6 g, another putatively chemopreventive polyphenol, which were 7.7 and 12.7 nmol/g in tumor and normal tissue, respectively (20). In human-derived colon cells in vitro, resveratrol has been shown to elicit biochemical effects commensurate with anticarcinogenesis, such as growth inhibition and apoptosis induction, at concentrations exceeding ∼10 nmol/mL (2123). For example, the mean IC50 values for the resveratrol-mediated inhibition of growth of human-derived HT-29 or HCA-7 colon cancer cells were 19.9 and 26.2 nmol/mL, respectively (23). Although the concentrations measured here in the colorectum of patients were highly variable, they suggest that the doses administered (0.5 and 1.0 g) can give colorectal tissue levels associated with chemopreventive activity. It is important to note that these doses are similar to or considerably above those that have been shown to prevent colorectal malignancies in preclinical models. Daily doses of resveratrol in rodents that, when administered for an extended period of time, exerted chemopreventive activity and their corresponding counterparts in a 70-kg human (obtained by body surface area extrapolation; ref. 24) were as follows: 15 or 240 mg/kg in the ApcMin mouse (5, 6) equating to 81 mg and 1.3 g in humans; 0.2 mg/kg in rats exposed to azoxymethane (2) equating to 1.9 mg in humans; 8 mg/kg in rats that received N,N-dimethylhydrazine (3) equating to 75 mg in humans; the human equivalent doses that reduced azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in a mouse model of colitis were 116 and 232 mg (7).

We recovered resveratrol conjugates at quantifiable concentrations from the colorectum, with resveratrol-3-O-glucuronide furnishing the highest value at 86 nmol resveratrol equivalents/g. This finding is important as it has been speculated that resveratrol conjugates may contribute to the pharmacologic efficacy of its parent (1), a theory which still requires experimental verification. Concentrations of resveratrol and its metabolites varied depending on the anatomic site from where the tissue originated, with generally higher values in the right-sided than left-sided colorectum. Feces are transported from the cecum on the right side across the transverse to the sigmoid colon and rectum on the left, and resveratrol tissue concentrations are likely to be related to those in the feces. So it is conceivable that concentrations are higher in right-sided tissues as they come into contact with fecal resveratrol earlier than those on the left side. Furthermore, the feces are liquid in the right-sided colorectum, becoming more solid as they pass onto the left, and the fluid environment of the right colon is probably better suited to the permeation and absorption of small molecular weight species such as resveratrol than the semisolid environment on the left (25). Whereas plasma levels of parent resveratrol that accompanied tissue levels were at or below the limit of quantitation, resveratrol monoglucuronides, resveratrol-3-O-sulfate, resveratrol disulfate, and resveratrol sulfate glucuronide circulated at quantifiable levels, consistent with the low systemic availability of resveratrol and its avid conjugative metabolism (1). The implication of this finding is that the presence of resveratrol conjugates in the circulation may be exploited as markers of adherence in future intervention trials of resveratrol.

There was an indication that resveratrol exerted a small reduction in cell proliferation in colorectal tissue after ingestion. Although the biological importance of such a slight decrease is debatable, its observation suggests that, in principle, resveratrol can exert a pharmacologic effect in the human colorectum. It needs to be stressed that pharmacodynamic data based on the comparison of phenomena in biopsies with those in resection tissue have to be interpreted with utmost caution because of differences in localization, method of surgical procurement, and size of samples. Nevertheless, compromising cell proliferation is one of the modes of action by which resveratrol is thought to exert its chemopreventive efficacy, and the slight reduction in cell proliferation observed here is consistent with the effect of resveratrol on colorectal cells in vitro (2123) and colorectal tissue in rats in vivo (3).

In conclusion, the results described here suggest that daily doses of resveratrol at 0.5 and 1.0 g can furnish levels in the human gastrointestinal tract that are of an order of magnitude sufficient to elicit pharmacologic effects. Therefore, resveratrol merits further clinical evaluation as a potential alternative to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and selective COX inhibitors in colorectal cancer chemoprevention.

T. Booth, employment, Pharmascience, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The other authors declared no potential conflict of interest.

We thank Sarah Porter, Tracy Cook, and Simone Daly for help with patient identification and Mike Thomas and John Jameson (all at University Hospitals of Leicester) for provision of resection material.

Grant Support: US National Cancer Institute contract NCI-N01-CN-25025, Cancer Research UK program grant C325/A6691, and an Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre grant (Cancer Research UK and UK Department of Health).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Baur
JA
,
Sinclair
DA
. 
Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence
.
Nat Rev Drug Discov
2006
;
5
:
493
506
.
2
Tessitore
L
,
Davit
A
,
Sarotto
I
,
Caderni
G
. 
Resveratrol depresses the growth of colorectal aberrant crypt foci by affecting bax and p21(CIP) expression
.
Carcinogenesis
2000
;
21
:
1619
22
.
3
Sengottuvelan
M
,
Viswanathan
P
,
Nalini
N
. 
Chemopreventive effect of trans-resveratrol - a phytoalexin against colonic aberrant crypt foci and cell proliferation in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis
.
Carcinogenesis
2006
;
27
:
1038
46
.
4
Sengottuvelan
M
,
Nalini
N
. 
Dietary supplementation of resveratrol suppresses colonic tumour incidence in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-treated rats by modulating biotransforming enzymes and aberrant crypt foci development
.
Br J Nutr
2006
;
96
:
145
53
.
5
Schneider
Y
,
Duranton
B
,
Gosse
F
,
Schleiffer
R
,
Seiler
N
,
Raul
F
. 
Resveratrol inhibits intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates host-defense-related gene expression in an animal model of human familial adenomatous polyposis
.
Nutr Cancer
2001
;
39
:
102
7
.
6
Sale
S
,
Tunstall
RG
,
Ruparelia
KC
,
Potter
GA
,
Steward
WP
,
Gescher
AJ
. 
Comparison of the effects of the chemopreventive agent resveratrol and its synthetic analog trans 3,4,5,4′-tetramethoxystilbene (DMU 212) on adenoma development in the ApcMin+ mouse and cyclooxygenase-2 in human-derived colon cancer cells
.
Int J Cancer
2005
;
115
:
194
201
.
7
Cui
X
,
Jin
Y
,
Hofseth
AB
, et al
. 
Resveratrol suppresses colitis and colon cancer associated with colitis
.
Cancer Prev Res
2010
;
3
:
549
59
.
8
Dube
C
,
Rostom
A
,
Lewin
G
, et al
. 
The use of aspirin for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: A systematic review prepared for the US Preventive Services Task Force
.
Ann Intern Med
2007
;
146
:
365
75
.
9
Psaty
BM
,
Potter
JD
. 
Risks and benefits of celecoxib to prevent recurrent adenomas
.
N Engl J Med
2006
;
355
:
950
2
.
10
Boocock
DJ
,
Faust
GES
,
Patel
KR
, et al
. 
Phase I dose escalation pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers of resveratrol, a potential cancer chemopreventive agent
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2007
;
16
:
1246
52
.
11
Meng
XF
,
Maliakal
P
,
Lu
H
,
Lee
MJ
,
Yang
CS
. 
Urinary and plasma levels of resveratrol and quercetin in humans, mice, and rats after ingestion of pure compounds and grape juice
.
J Agric Food Chem
2004
;
52
:
935
42
.
12
Walle
T
,
Hsieh
F
,
DeLegge
MH
,
Oatis
JE
,
Walle
UK
. 
High absorption but very low bioavailability of oral resveratrol in humans
.
Drug Metab Disp
2004
;
32
:
1377
82
.
13
Almeida
L
,
Vaz-da-Silva
M
,
Falcao
A
, et al
. 
Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of trans-resveratrol in a rising multiple-dose study in healthy volunteers
.
Mol Nutr Food Res
2009
;
53
:
S7
15
.
14
Nunes
T
,
Almeida
L
,
Rocha
JF
, et al
. 
Pharmacokinetics of trans-resveratrol following repeated administration in healthy elderly and young subjects
.
J Clin Pharmacol
2009
;
49
:
1477
82
.
15
Goldberg
DA
,
Yan
J
,
Soleas
GJ
. 
Absorption of three wine-related polyphenols in three different matrices by healthy subjects
.
Clin Biochem
2003
;
36
:
79
87
.
16
Vitaglione
P
,
Sforza
S
,
Galaverna
G
, et al
. 
Bioavailability of trans-resveratrol from red wine in humans
.
Mol Nutr Food Res
2005
;
49
:
495
504
.
17
Zamora-Ros
R
,
Urpi-Sarda
M
,
Lamuela-Raventos
RM
, et al
. 
Diagnostic performance of urinary resveratrol metabolites as a biomarker of moderate wine consumption
.
Clin Chem
2006
;
52
:
1373
80
.
18
Athar
M
,
Back
JH
,
Tang
X
, et al
. 
Resveratrol: A review of preclinical studies for human cancer prevention
.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
2007
;
224
:
274
83
.
19
Boocock
DJ
,
Patel
K
,
Faust
GES
, et al
. 
Quantitation of trans-resveratrol and detection of its metabolites in human plasma and urine by high performance liquid chromatography
.
J Chromatog B
2007
;
848
:
182
7
.
20
Garcea
G
,
Jones
DJL
,
Berry
DP
, et al
. 
Consumption of the putative chemopreventive agent curcumin by cancer patients: assessment of curcumin levels in the colorectum and their pharmacodynamic consequences
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
120
5
.
21
Schneider
Y
,
Vincent
F
,
Duranton
B
, et al
. 
Anti-proliferative effect of resveratrol, a natural component of grapes and wine, on human colonic cancer cells
.
Cancer Lett
2000
;
158
:
85
91
.
22
Fuggetta
MP
,
Lanzilli
G
,
Tricarico
M
, et al
. 
Effect of resveratrol on proliferation and telomerase activity of human colon cancer cells in vitro
.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res
2006
;
25
:
189
93
.
23
Sale
S
,
Verschoyle
RD
,
Boocock
D
, et al
. 
Pharmacokinetics in mice and growth-inhibitory properties of the putative cancer chemopreventive agent resveratrol and the synthetic analogue trans 3,4,5,4′-tetramethoxystilbene
.
Br J Cancer
2004
;
90
:
736
44
.
24
Freireich
EJ
,
Gehan
EA
,
Rall
DP
,
Schmidt
LH
,
Skipper
HE
. 
Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey, and man
.
Cancer Chemother Rep
1966
;
50
:
219
44
.
25
Hebden
JM
,
Gilchrist
PJ
,
Perkins
AC
,
Wilson
CG
,
Spiller
RC
. 
Stool water content and colonic drug absorption: contrasting effects of lactulose and codeine
.
Pharm Res
1999
;
16
:
1254
9
.