Loss of TGFBI, a secreted protein induced by transforming growth factor-β, has been implicated in cell proliferation, tumor progression, and angiogenesis by in vitro studies. However, in vivo antitumor functions of TGFBI as well as the underlying molecular mechanism are not well understood. To these aims, we have generated a mouse model with disruption of TGFBI genomic locus. Mice lacking TGFBI show a retarded growth and are prone to spontaneous tumors and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene–induced skin tumors. In relation to wild-type (WT) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF), TGFBI−/− MEFs display increased frequencies of chromosomal aberration and micronuclei formation and exhibit an enhanced proliferation and early S-phase entry. Cyclin D1 is up-regulated in TGFBI−/− MEFs, which correlates with aberrant activation of transcription factor cyclic AMP–responsive element binding protein (CREB) identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assays. TGFBI reconstitution in TGFBI−/− cells by either retroviral infection with WT TGFBI gene or supplement with recombinant mouse TGFBI protein in the culture medium leads to the suppression of CREB activation and cyclin D1 expression, and further inhibition of cell proliferation. Cyclin D1 up-regulation was also identified in most of the tumors arising from TGFBI−/− mice. Our studies provide the first evidence that TGFBI functions as a tumor suppressor in vivo. [Cancer Res 2009;69(1):37–44]

Tumor growth and metastasis is a multistep process involving cell adhesion, proteolytic enzyme degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and motility factors that influence cell migration (1, 2). Integrins are cell surface adhesive receptors composed of α- and β-chain heterocomplexes. Both subunits transverse the membrane and mediate the physical and functional interactions between cell and its surrounding ECM, thus serving as bidirectional transducers of extracellular and intracellular signals, which ultimately lead to regulation of adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, antiapoptosis, and tumor progression (3, 4).

TGFBI was first identified in a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line (A549) treated with transforming growth factor-β (5). This gene encodes a highly conserved 683–amino acid protein that contains a secretary signal sequence and four internal homologous domains, the last of which contains an RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) motif that can serve as a ligand recognition site for integrins (5). TGFBI product is a component of ECM in lung and mediates cell adhesion and migration through interacting with integrin via integrin receptors: α3β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5 (610). It is ubiquitously expressed in human normal tissues; however, down-regulation or lost expression of this gene has been found in a list of human tumor cell lines, including lung, breast, colon, prostate, and leukemia, as well as in human primary lung and breast tumor specimens (1114). CpG island hypermethylation in the promoter region, one of the mechanisms by which tumor suppressor genes are inactivated in human cancers, correlates with the silencing of TGFBI promoter and its subsequent down-expression (15). In vitro studies have implicated its role in maintaining microtubule stability and inhibiting tumorigenicity and tumor angiogenesis (12, 13, 1619), suggesting a tumor suppressor function in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we have generated a TGFBI-null mouse model. The results showed, for the first time, that TGFBI loss promotes cell proliferation through aberrant activation of cyclic AMP–responsive element binding protein (CREB)-cyclin D1 pathway and predisposes mice to spontaneous tumor development.

Generation of TGFBI-null mice. The TGFBI locus was PCR cloned using a genomic 129 DNA as template. Linearized targeting vector DNA (70 μg) was electroporated into 129Sv/Ev embryonic stem (ES) cells. Heterozygous targeting ES cells were identified by Southern blot and two different targeted clones were microinjected into C57BL/6J blastocytes. Chimerical male mice were produced and mated with C57BL/6J females. Germ-line transmission of the targeted TGFBI allele was verified by Southern blot analysis of tail DNA from F1 offspring. All mice studied for spontaneous tumor development were the F2 generation of 129Sv/Ev × C57BL/6J crosses. Mice were genotyped by Southern analysis and PCR (primers and conditions available on request). Detailed necropsy and histology are described in Supplementary Data. Protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Columbia University. Animal procedures were conducted in compliance with IACUC.

Cell cycle analysis. For S-phase reentry experiment, confluence-arrested cells were plated at 2 × 106 per 100-mm dish in medium containing 0.1% serum for 24 h before adding medium containing 10% serum. Following serum stimulation, cells were pulsed with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for 1 h at end of the time point and analyzed by FITC-BrdUrd Flow kit (BD Pharmingen).

Tumor cohorts and carcinogen treatment. For the 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)–treated cohort, 3- to 5-d-old mice were topically treated with 50 μL of 0.5% DMBA in acetone (Sigma) and monitored for up to 6 mo. Mice were visually examined weekly and were killed if any individual tumor reached a diameter of 5 mm or at the termination of the experiments. Skin tumors will be counted, excised, and examined by staining with H&E.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were carried out as previously described (20) and detected with quantitative PCR (Roter-Gene RG-3000A; ref. 21). Primers for mouse cyclin D1 gene were 5′-CCGGCTTTGATCTCTGCTTA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGCGGAGTCTGTAGCTCTCT-3′ (reverse). Primers used for negative control were 5′-AGGTGGAGAAACACCACCAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGGTTTGCCCAAGAAAAATA-3′ (reverse).

Luciferase activity assay and constructs. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were transiently cotransfected with luciferase reporter and dominant-negative plasmid. Forty-eight hours later, relative luciferase activity was determined by Dual Luciferase Activity kit (Promega). Relative luciferase activity was normalized to concentration of cell lysates. The relative fold induction or suppression represents the relative intensity of the experimental sample divided by the relative intensity of the medium control.

Reverse transcription-PCR method and primers. The expression of cyclin D1 gene was analyzed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR; Applied Biosystems 7300) using the procedures described previously (14). The primer sets are as follows: 5′-TCGTGGCCTCTAAGATGAAG-3′ and 5′-TTTTGGAGAGGAAGTGTTCG-3′ for mouse cyclin D1 and 5′-AAGGTCATCCCAGAGCTGAA-3′ and 5′-CTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGA-3′ for mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

To verify the deletion of exons 4 to 6 in TGFBI−/− MEFs, a pair of oligonucleotide primers specific for the upstream and downstream regions of exons 4 to 6 was designed. The primer sequences are as follows: upstream, 5′-CTCATGCGACTGCTGACCCTCGCTCTG (55-81); downstream, 5′-CAGCACACATGGCTGACTTCAGGATGTG (973-1000). cDNAs, synthesized from the total RNAs of wild-type (WT) and TGFBI−/− MEFs, were used as the templates for PCR amplification. Using this approach, a 945-bp PCR product was detected in WT, whereas a 475-bp PCR product was identified in TGFBI−/− MEFs due to the deletion of exons 4 to 6.

Antibodies and recombinant mouse TGFBI protein. Antibodies used in Western blots include mouse monoclonal cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz), rabbit phospho-CREB (p-CREB; Ser133) monoclonal antibody (mAb; Cell Signaling), mouse β-actin mAb (Sigma), anti-CD3 (T-cell marker), and anti-CD45R/B220 (B-cell marker; BD Pharmingen). Rat anti-mouse TGFBI mAb and mouse recombinant TGFBI protein were purchased from R&D Systems.

Tumor development in mice lacking TGFBI gene. To explore the physiologic function of TGFBI and its role in tumorigenesis, TGFBI-deficient mice were generated by homologous recombination. The correct targeting resulted in the replacement of exons 4 to 6 of TGFBI gene in mice with a neomycin resistance gene (Fig. 1A) and was identified by Southern analysis (Fig. 1B). TGFBI−/− MEFs still expressed TGFBI mRNA but the level was ∼6-fold lower than in WT MEFs (data not shown). Moreover, deletion of exons 4 to 6 in TGFBI−/− MEFs was shown by RT-PCR (Fig. 1C), and absence of TGFBI protein was revealed by Western blot (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1.

Targeted disruption of TGFBI in mice. A, strategy for generating the targeted TGFBI allele. Exons 4 to 6 were replaced by neomycin resistance cassette (neo) with introduction of one BamH1 restriction site at 3′ terminal. Targeting construct and WT allele are shown. Successful targeting will yield a 4.2-kb BamH1-restricted fragment in the neo allele. B, germinal transmission of the targeted TGFBI allele was identified by Southern blot. C, identification of deletion of exons 4 to 6 in knockout (KO) MEFs by RT-PCR using a pair of primers specific for the upstream and downstream regions of exons 4 to 6. W, WT; T, truncated. D, Western blot of conditioned medium prepared from MEFs with indicated genotypic backgrounds. Mouse TGFBI recombinant protein was used as positive control (P).

Figure 1.

Targeted disruption of TGFBI in mice. A, strategy for generating the targeted TGFBI allele. Exons 4 to 6 were replaced by neomycin resistance cassette (neo) with introduction of one BamH1 restriction site at 3′ terminal. Targeting construct and WT allele are shown. Successful targeting will yield a 4.2-kb BamH1-restricted fragment in the neo allele. B, germinal transmission of the targeted TGFBI allele was identified by Southern blot. C, identification of deletion of exons 4 to 6 in knockout (KO) MEFs by RT-PCR using a pair of primers specific for the upstream and downstream regions of exons 4 to 6. W, WT; T, truncated. D, Western blot of conditioned medium prepared from MEFs with indicated genotypic backgrounds. Mouse TGFBI recombinant protein was used as positive control (P).

Close modal

TGFBI−/− mice arose from crosses of TGFBI+/− mice at expected Mendelian frequency and showed a slower postnatal development with a 13.5 ± 3% lower body weight than that of sex-matched TGFBI+/+ littermates from 2- to 6-month age (n = 10; Supplementary Fig. S1). Histologic surveys of liver, lung, kidney, stomach, intestine, and testis (n = 10 per genotype; age, 26 weeks) did not reveal morphologic abnormalities. However, 2 of 10 TGFBI−/− mice showed splenomegaly that was identified as B-cell hyperplasia (Supplementary Fig. S2).

To assess the tumor suppressor activity of TGFBI in vivo, a large cohort of TGFBI−/− (n = 54), TGFBI+/− (n = 75), and TGFBI+/+ (n = 48) animals generated from crosses of TGFBI+/− mice was observed for the development of spontaneous malignancies for up to 20 months. Mice were sacrificed for complete necropsies either at earlier time due to clinical features of systemic illness (weight loss, inactivity, ruffling of fur, and hunched posture) or when reaching end of the observation period. From ages of 9 to 16 months, >20% of TGFBI−/− mice died of systemic illness, whereas all TGFBI+/+ mice were still alive. To determine the cause of death, the moribund TGFBI−/− mice between ages of 9 and 16 months were sacrificed and subjected to detailed histopathologic analysis. Four of 12 mice developed malignancies, including one invasive lung adenocarcinoma and three lymphomas, one of which was a highly disseminated lymphoma infiltrating liver and lung tissues (Fig. 2A). Others died of unidentified causes with no detectable tumors. Survival of heterozygotes was similar as TGFBI+/+ mice, and only one died at the end of 16 months without detectable tumor burden. By the end of 20 months, 8.3% (4 of 48, lung adenocarcinoma and lymphoma) of TGFBI+/+ mice, 13.3% (10 of 75, uterus histiocytic sarcoma, liver tumor, lymphoma, and lung adenocarcinoma) of heterozygotes, and 37.0% (20 of 54) of TGFBI−/− mice had developed tumors (P < 0.01 for TGFBI−/− versus heterozygotes and TGFBI+/+ mice, χ2 test; Fig. 2B; Supplementary Table S1). The tumor incidence in heterozygotes is higher than in WT mice but did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05, χ2 test). Southern blot–based genotyping analysis showed that the second WT allele of TGFBI gene was retained in all the 10 tumors derived from heterozygous mice. However, 3 of 10 tumors displayed a dense methylation pattern in the TGFBI promoter identified by bisulfite sequencing (Supplementary Fig. S3). Tumor-free survival in TGFBI−/− mice was significantly lower than in heterozygote and TGFBI+/+ mice (P < 0.01, log-rank test; Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.

TGFBI−/− mice showed an increased tumor incidence. A, images of disseminated lymphoma in liver (left) and lung (right). B, image of metastasized tumor in liver (left) and lung adenocarcinoma (right). Magnification, ×400 (A and B). C, tumor-free survival of TGFBI−/− mice compared with WT and heterozygotes. D, incidence of DMBA-induced skin tumors in WT and TGFBI−/− mice.

Figure 2.

TGFBI−/− mice showed an increased tumor incidence. A, images of disseminated lymphoma in liver (left) and lung (right). B, image of metastasized tumor in liver (left) and lung adenocarcinoma (right). Magnification, ×400 (A and B). C, tumor-free survival of TGFBI−/− mice compared with WT and heterozygotes. D, incidence of DMBA-induced skin tumors in WT and TGFBI−/− mice.

Close modal

An increased skin tumor induction in mice with TGFBI deficiency. In skin carcinogenesis assays, we treated TGFBI+/+, TGFBI+/−, and TGFBI−/− mice with a single dose of DMBA, a chemical carcinogen, on the dorsal skin 3 to 5 days after birth. The treated mice were checked weekly and monitored for up to 6 months. Ten of 23 TGFBI−/− mice developed skin tumors by 2.5- to 6-month age, 2 of which formed skin tumors at multiple sites. In contrast, only 2 of 21 TGFBI+/− mice and 1 of 25 TGFBI+/+ mice developed tumors during 6-month observation period. Skin tumor incidence in TGFBI−/− mice was significantly higher (P < 0.01, χ2 test) than in TGFBI+/+ and heterozygous mice (Fig. 2D). Therefore, mice with TGFBI deficiency are prone to the development of both spontaneous malignancies and DMBA-induced skin tumors.

Early passage (P2) of TGFBI−/− MEFs exhibits an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations. To clarify whether disruption of TGFBI resulted in an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations, TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs at passage 2 were treated with 0.05 μg/mL colcemid for 3 to 6 hours. Chromosomal metaphases were prepared from the treated cells, hybridized with Cy3-conjugated (C3TA2)3 peptide nucleic acid probe (Applied Biosystems), and counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution followed by the previously reported procedures (22). Digital images were recorded using Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope with a multicolor image analysis system (Fig. 3A). Various types of chromosomal aberrations in TGFBI−/− MEFs were shown in Fig. 3B (arrows). Overall, 43.75% (7 of 17) of metaphases prepared from TGFBI−/− MEFs contained chromatid breaks, centric fragments, or chromosomal breaks, whereas only 13.3% (2 of 15) metaphases from WT MEFs contained only centric fragments (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

Increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in early passage (P2) of TGFBI−/− MEFs. A, digital images of Cy3-stained (identify telomeres) and DAPI-stained (identify chromosomes) chromosomal metaphases in WT and TGFBI KO MEFs. Arrow, centric ring. B, various types of chromosomal aberrations (arrows) found in KO MEFs. C, multiple micronuclei (arrows) identified in KO MEFs. D, frequency of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs.

Figure 3.

Increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in early passage (P2) of TGFBI−/− MEFs. A, digital images of Cy3-stained (identify telomeres) and DAPI-stained (identify chromosomes) chromosomal metaphases in WT and TGFBI KO MEFs. Arrow, centric ring. B, various types of chromosomal aberrations (arrows) found in KO MEFs. C, multiple micronuclei (arrows) identified in KO MEFs. D, frequency of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs.

Close modal

In addition, frequency of micronuclei was also examined in the early passage of MEFs (P2). Twenty-four hours after plating, cells were fixed with acetone/methanol (1:1) for 10 minutes and stained with 0.03 mg/mL acridine orange in the dark for 10 minutes. A total of 3,000 cells were counted for each experiment and three independent assays were performed. Numbers of micronuclei were recorded in each cell type using Nikon fluorescence microscope. Figure 3C showed multiple micronuclei found in TGFBI−/− MEFs (arrows). Micronuclei frequency in TGFBI−/− MEFs was 4.7-fold higher than that in WT MEFs, with 0.128 and 0.027 micronuclei per cell, respectively (Fig. 3D).

An accelerated G1-S progression and cyclin D1 up-regulation in TGFBI−/− MEFs (passage 18). To investigate molecular mechanism(s) of tumorigenesis, we characterized MEFs derived from TGFBI−/− and TGFBI+/+ littermates. Long-term in vitro growth of MEFs was assayed by a 3T3 protocol. TGFBI−/− MEFs showed a higher growth at early passage (P2) but grew significantly faster than TGFBI+/+ MEFs after overcoming the senescence (Fig. 4A). This prompted a comparison of the kinetics of S-phase entry in serum-stimulated quiescent cells. Using BrdUrd incorporation assay, quiescent TGFBI−/− MEFs were consistently found to enter into S phase in advance of TGFBI+/+ MEFs on serum stimulation (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Characterization of growth property and cyclin D1 expression in TGFBI-null MEFs. A, cell proliferation on a 3T3 protocol. MEFs were isolated from 13.5-d embryos and grown at 5% CO2 in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS. For 3T3 protocol, 9 × 105 cells were plated into 10-cm dish and cell numbers were counted at 3-d interval. At least three independent lines per genotype with two independent cultures per line were examined. B, kinetics of S-phase entry on serum stimulation of quiescent TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs. C, cyclin D1 induction in serum-stimulated quiescent TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs determined by Western blots. D, Western blot result of cyclin D1 level in exponentially grown MEFs with TGFBI−/− and WT backgrounds and in TGFBI−/− MEFs after reconstitution of TGFBI by infection with retroviral V-mTGFBI vectors (pMSCV-mTGFBI).

Figure 4.

Characterization of growth property and cyclin D1 expression in TGFBI-null MEFs. A, cell proliferation on a 3T3 protocol. MEFs were isolated from 13.5-d embryos and grown at 5% CO2 in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS. For 3T3 protocol, 9 × 105 cells were plated into 10-cm dish and cell numbers were counted at 3-d interval. At least three independent lines per genotype with two independent cultures per line were examined. B, kinetics of S-phase entry on serum stimulation of quiescent TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs. C, cyclin D1 induction in serum-stimulated quiescent TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs determined by Western blots. D, Western blot result of cyclin D1 level in exponentially grown MEFs with TGFBI−/− and WT backgrounds and in TGFBI−/− MEFs after reconstitution of TGFBI by infection with retroviral V-mTGFBI vectors (pMSCV-mTGFBI).

Close modal

We then examined the expression patterns of proteins related to G1-S progression. Cyclin D1 was identified to be significantly up-regulated in TGFBI−/− MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S4). Moreover, cyclin D1 induction was substantially higher in quiescent TGFBI−/− MEFs at 4 hours after serum stimulation relative to TGFBI+/+ cells (Fig. 4C). However, TGFBI reconstitution in TGFBI−/− MEFs by infection with retroviral vector containing WT TGFBI gene resulted in a marked suppression of cyclin D1 expression (Fig. 4D) and subsequent inhibition of cell growth measured by BrdUrd incorporation (Supplementary Fig. S4).

Aberrant activation of CREB and an increased binding activity of p-CREB to cyclin D1 promoter in the absence of TGFBI in TGFBI−/− MEFs (passage 18). A transcriptional mechanism seems to be involved in cyclin D1 up-regulation because TGFBI−/− MEFs showed a 5.6-fold higher level of cyclin D1 mRNA than WT cells (Fig. 5A). Cyclin D1 promoter region contains several established or potential binding sites for the transcriptional factors (23). Thus, induction of transcription factors was examined by Western blots in quiescent WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs in response to serum stimulation. Only CREB was identified to be aberrantly activated in TGFBI−/− cells (Fig. 5B), which is further substantiated by a luciferase reporter assay showing that relative pCRE promoter activity in TGFBI−/− cells was over 15-fold higher than WT cells; however, it can be suppressed significantly by a dominant-negative CREB (DN-CREB) vector (Fig. 5C and D).

Figure 5.

Aberrant activation of CREB in TGFBI−/− MEFs. A, mRNA level of cyclin D1 in TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs determined by real-time RT-PCR. B, levels of p-CREB and cyclin D1 in serum-stimulated WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs examined by Western blots. C, relative pCRE-luc activity in WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs. D, relative pCRE-luc activity in WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs after cotransfection of pCRE-luc with WT-CREB or DN-CREB vectors.

Figure 5.

Aberrant activation of CREB in TGFBI−/− MEFs. A, mRNA level of cyclin D1 in TGFBI−/− and WT MEFs determined by real-time RT-PCR. B, levels of p-CREB and cyclin D1 in serum-stimulated WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs examined by Western blots. C, relative pCRE-luc activity in WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs. D, relative pCRE-luc activity in WT and TGFBI−/− MEFs after cotransfection of pCRE-luc with WT-CREB or DN-CREB vectors.

Close modal

To determine whether aberrant activation of CREB in TGFBI−/− cells results in an enhanced binding activity of p-CREB to cyclin D1 promoter, a quantitative PCR-based ChIP assay was used to quantify the bindings of CREB and p-CREB to cyclin D1 promoter in both WT and TGFBI−/− cells. As shown in Fig. 6A, ratio of p-CREB/CREB binding to cyclin D1 promoter is over 5-fold higher in TGFBI−/− cells than in WT cells, suggesting that binding activity of p-CREB to cyclin D1 is significantly increased in TGFBI−/− cells.

Figure 6.

Correlation between CREB activation and cyclin D1 up-regulation in TGFBI−/− MEFs. A, ratio of p-CREB/CREB binding to cyclin D1 promoter region quantified by a quantitative PCR-based ChIP assay. B, significant suppression of relative pCCND1 promoter luciferase activity in TGFBI−/− MEFs after cotransfection of pCCND1 promoter with WT CREB or DN-CREB vectors. C, suppression of CREB phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression in TGFBI−/− cells after incubation with recombinant mouse TGFBI protein at 0.5 μg/mL for 24 h. D, Western blot results of cyclin D1 protein level in tumor tissues arising from TGFBI−/− mice compared with the tissues from WT littermates. T, tumors; LP, lymphoma.

Figure 6.

Correlation between CREB activation and cyclin D1 up-regulation in TGFBI−/− MEFs. A, ratio of p-CREB/CREB binding to cyclin D1 promoter region quantified by a quantitative PCR-based ChIP assay. B, significant suppression of relative pCCND1 promoter luciferase activity in TGFBI−/− MEFs after cotransfection of pCCND1 promoter with WT CREB or DN-CREB vectors. C, suppression of CREB phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression in TGFBI−/− cells after incubation with recombinant mouse TGFBI protein at 0.5 μg/mL for 24 h. D, Western blot results of cyclin D1 protein level in tumor tissues arising from TGFBI−/− mice compared with the tissues from WT littermates. T, tumors; LP, lymphoma.

Close modal

TGFBI deficiency correlates with CREB activation and leads to cyclin D1 up-regulation. To determine whether CREB activation is responsible for cyclin D1 up-regulation in TGFBI−/− cells (passage 18), a luciferase assay was used to examine the specific suppression of cyclin D1 promoter activity by DN-CREB. The cyclin D1 promoter activity in TGFBI−/− cells was over 10-fold higher than in WT cells (data not shown); however, it could be inhibited to the similar level of WT cells by DN-CREB (Fig. 6B). These data clearly suggested that CREB activation is involved in cyclin D1 up-regulation in TGFBI-null cells.

Correlation between TGFBI deficiency and CREB activation was further established by reconstitution of TGFBI expression in TGFBI−/− cells. Compared with WT cells, TGFBI−/− cells showed a significantly higher level of p-CREB and cyclin D1, whereas it could be suppressed to the level of WT cells after supplement with recombinant mouse TGFBI protein in the culture medium at 0.5 μg/mL for 24 hours (Fig. 6C).

Cyclin D1 up-regulation in tumors arising from TGFBI−/− mice. To define the potential significance of cyclin D1 up-regulation in in vivo tumor development, cyclin D1 protein level was examined by Western blotting in tumor tissues arising from TGFBI−/− mice. A markedly increased level of cyclin D1 protein was shown in most (10 of 13) of tumor samples examined in relation to their matched WT controls (Fig. 6D).

TGFBI gene has been regionally mapped to chromosome 5q31, a locus often deleted in leukemias, myelodysplastic syndromes, and many human cancers, such as renal cell, esophageal, and lung carcinomas (2426). In addition, lost expression or down-regulation of this gene has been found in a list of human tumor cell lines as well as in primary human lung and breast cancer specimens (1114). Specifically, TGFBI down-regulation has been causally linked to an enhanced tumorigenicity and tumor angiogenesis by in vitro studies (12, 13, 18, 19). However, it is not clear whether TGFBI possesses antitumor function in vivo. To this aim, TGFBI-null mice have been generated. The results showed that mice with TGFBI disruption are prone to spontaneous tumors as well as DMBA-induced skin tumors. The most common tumors arising spontaneously in TGFBI−/− mice were lymphomas (65%, 13 of 20). Other tumor types were bronchial adenocarcinoma, skin invasive adenocarcinoma, liver histiocytic sarcoma, and testis hemangioendothelioma, which are less common in aged 129Sv/Ev, C56BL/6J mice. Compared with the tumors occurred in TGFBI+/+ and heterozygous mice, spontaneous tumors arisen from TGFBI−/− mice showed metastatic potential: (a) 7 of 13 lymphomas were classified as disseminated types with infiltration to other nonlymphoid organs, including liver, lung, kidney, and pancreas; (b) 4 of 6 other types of tumors were either invasive or metastatic malignancies; and (c) one TGFBI−/− mouse developed both invasive lung adenocarcinoma and lymphoproliferative disorder. Hence, TGFBI disruption resulted in a dramatic predisposition to lymphomas and other cancers.

Cell cycle progression through the G1 phase requires dual signaling from soluble growth factors and adhesion to the ECM (27). Both receptor tyrosine kinase–dependent and integrin-dependent proliferations are regulated through three major G1-phase targets, including induction of cyclin D1 and down-regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21cip1 and p27kip1, which lead to efficient phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein and progression to S phase (2729). Under mitogenic conditions, adhesion promotes G1-phase progression primarily via up-regulation of cyclin D1 (30). Because TGFBI is an adhesion protein associated with integrin receptor through its RGD motif (810), it is expected that an accelerated G1-S transition in TGFBI−/− cells is due to the dysregulation of three major G1-phase targets. This is supported by our findings showing that cyclin D1 is overexpressed in TGFBI−/− cells. In contrast, TGFBI reconstitution results in a substantially decreased level of cyclin D1 expression and cellular proliferation. Furthermore, cyclin D1 protein level was shown to be elevated in most of tumors isolated from TGFBI−/− mice, suggesting a critical role of cyclin D1 up-regulation in in vivo tumor progression in the absence of TGFBI protein. It is well documented that cyclin D1 plays a major role in controlling G1-S progression and is consistently up-regulated in most human cancers (28, 31). Deregulated cell proliferation and increased frequency of spontaneous tumors has been found in transgenic mice with overexpression of cyclin D1, whereas deletion of cyclin D1 protects the mice from tumor induction (3234). Collectively, these observations together with our findings suggest a critical role of cyclin D1 up-regulation in the enhanced cell proliferation and tumor formation in TGFBI−/− mice. However, cyclin D2, cyclin D3, cyclin A, and p21CIP1 expression was not strongly affected by loss of TGFBI, although p21CIP1 level seemed lower in TGFBI−/− MEFs.

CREB has been shown to act as an oncogene and implicated in the development of human endocrine tumors and acute myeloid leukemia (3537). In this study, CREB was identified to be aberrantly activated after TGFBI disruption. In addition, causal links between TGFBI deficiency and CREB activation, and cyclin D1 up-regulation have been established in our model system, suggesting that signaling pathway from TGFBI to CREB/cyclin D1 is dysregulated after TGFBI disruption and is involved in tumor progression in TGFBI−/− mice. The exact mechanisms of CREB/cyclin D1 activation downstream of TGFBI remain unknown but may include activation of one or more kinases through an integrin-dependent pathway, including FAK, AKT, protein kinase A, protein kinase C, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, glycogen synthase kinase III, and casein kinase II, which have been shown to regulate CREB phosphorylation (35, 38). We have found that phospho-AKT was substantially elevated in serum-starved early passage (P2) of TGFBI−/− MEFs at 15 and 30 minutes after serum stimulation when compared with WT cells (Supplementary Fig. S5). Previous studies have shown that CREB can be activated by protein kinase B/AKT (38, 39); therefore, AKT pathway might mediate TGFBI-regulated CREB/cyclin D1 activation in TGFBI−/− cells.

It is commonly accepted that malignant transformation is a lengthy multistep process and arises through an accumulation of mutations at various genetic loci (40). Genomic instability has been shown to not only initiate tumorigenesis but is at least a factor in tumor progression (40, 41). In the present study, early passage of TGFBI−/− MEFs showed a significantly increased chromosomal aberration and micronuclei than WT MEFs, suggesting that TGFBI deficiency induces genetic instability. This is supported by other study showing that TGFBI protein is involved in microtubule stability and silencing of its expression contributes to centrosome amplification and enhanced mitotic abnormalities (17). It is well documented that chromosomal instability, which is equated to mitotic defects and consequential chromosome segregation errors, provides a formidable basis for the acquisition of further malignant phenotype during tumor progression (42). It should be noted that 3 of 13 tumor samples isolated from TGFBI−/− mice did not show cyclin D1 up-regulation. Thus, other signaling pathway(s) instead of CREB/cyclin D1 activation might be aberrantly regulated due to genomic instability.

Although loss of TGFBI expression has been found in different types of primary human cancers (1114), several studies show that TGFBI is commonly overexpressed in colorectal, renal, and pancreas cancers (4345). In addition, overexpression of TGFBI promotes metastasis of SW480 colon cancer cells by enhancing extravasation (45). However, we have found a significant down-regulation of TGFBI in HT29 colon cancer cells (12). These data clearly point out that dysregulation of TGFBI expression is tumor cell or type specific. It is highly possible that TGFBI is a double-edged sword whose loss or gain of expression leads to tumorigenesis. Previous studies have shown that TGFBI mutations correlate with human corneal dystrophy (46). However, overexpression of mutant TGFBI induces retinal degeneration, but no corneal phenotype was observed in transgenic mice (47). Similarly, we did not identify any eye phenotypes in TGFBI−/− mice.

The present studies provide the evidence, for the first time, that loss of TGFBI functions as a tumor suppressor in vivo. Because of frequent loss of TGFBI protein in human cancer cells (1114), TGFBI and its associated signaling represent the promising targets for anticancer drug discovery.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Y. Zhang and G. Wen contributed equally to this work.

Grant support: NASA NAG2-1637 (Y. Zhao), CA127120 (Y. Zhao), and NIH ES-11804 (T.K. Hei).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Drs. Ze'ev A. Ronai, Howard B. Lieberman, and Dangsheng Li for critical reading; Dr. M.R. Montminy (San Diego, CA) for kindly providing WT CREB and DN-CREB expression plasmids; and Dr. Isabella Screpanti (University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy) for mouse cyclin D1 luciferase reporter plasmid.

1
Tlsty TD. Cell-adhesion-dependent influences on genomic instability and carcinogenesis.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
1998
;
10
:
647
–53.
2
Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling.
Science
1999
;
285
:
1028
–32.
3
Danen EH. Integrins: regulators of tissue function and cancer progression.
Curr Pharm Des
2005
;
11
:
881
–91.
4
Ramsay AG, Marshall JF, Hart IR. Integrin trafficking and its role in cancer metastasis.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2007
;
26
:
567
–78.
5
Skonier J, Neubauer M, Madisen L, Bennett K, Plowman GD, Purchio AF. cDNA cloning and sequence analysis of β ig-h3, a novel gene induced in a human adenocarcinoma cell line after treatment with transforming growth factor-β.
DNA Cell Biol
1992
;
11
:
511
–22.
6
LeBaron RG, Bezverkov KI, Zimber MP, Pavelec R, Skonier J, Purchio AF. β IG-H3, a novel secretory protein inducible by transforming growth factor-β, is present in normal skin and promotes the adhesion and spreading of dermal fibroblasts in vitro.
J Invest Dermatol
1995
;
104
:
844
–9.
7
Billings PC, Herrick DJ, Kucich U, et al. Extracellular matrix and nuclear localization of β ig-h3 in human bladder smooth muscle and fibroblast cells.
J Cell Biochem
2000
;
79
:
261
–73.
8
Kim JE, Jeong HW, Nam JO, et al. Identification of motifs in the fasciclin domains of the transforming growth factor-β-induced matrix protein βig-h3 that interact with the αvβ5 integrin.
J Biol Chem
2002
;
277
:
46159
–65.
9
Nam JO, Kim JE, Jeong HW, et al. Identification of the αvβ3 integrin-interacting motif of βig-h3 and its anti-angiogenic effect.
J Biol Chem
2003
;
278
:
25902
–9.
10
Jeong HW, Kim IS. TGF-β1 enhances βig-h3-mediated keratinocyte cell migration through the α3β1 integrin and PI3K.
J Cell Biochem
2004
;
92
:
770
–80.
11
Genini M, Schwalbe P, Scholl FA, Schafer BW. Isolation of genes differentially expressed in human primary myoblasts and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.
Int J Cancer
1996
;
66
:
571
–7.
12
Zhao YL, Piao CQ, Hei TK. Downregulation of βig-h3 gene is causally linked to tumorigenic phenotype in asbestos treated immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells.
Oncogene
2002
;
2
:
7471
–7.
13
Zhao Y, El-Gabry M, Hei TK. Loss of βig-h3 protein is frequent in primary lung carcinoma and related to tumorigenic phenotype in lung cancer cells.
Mol Carcinog
2006
;
45
:
84
–92.
14
Calaf G, Echiburu-Chau C, Zhao YL, Hei TK. Bigh3 protein expression as a marker for breast cancer.
Int J Mol Med
2008
;
21
:
561
–8.
15
Shao G, Berenguer J, Borczuk AC, Powell CA, Hei TK, Zhao Y. Epigenetic inactivation of βig-h3 gene in human cancer cells.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
4566
–73.
16
Thapa N, Lee BH, Kim IS. TGFBIp/βig-h3 protein: a versatile matrix molecule induced by TGF-β.
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
2007
;
39
:
2183
–94.
17
Ahmed AA, Mills AD, Ibrahim AE, et al. The extracellular matrix protein induces microtubule stabilization and sensitizes ovarian cancers to paclitaxel.
Cancer Cell
2007
;
12
:
514
–27.
18
Nam JO, Jeong HW, Lee BH, Park RW, Kim IS. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by fastatin, the fourth FAS1 domain of βig-h3, via αvβ3 integrin.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
4153
–61.
19
Becker J, Volland S, Noskova I, Schramm A, Schweigerer LL, Wilting J. Keratoepithelin reverts the suppression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 by MYCN in human neuroblastoma: a mechanism to inhibit invasion.
Int J Oncol
2008
;
32
:
235
–40.
20
Kuo MH, Allis CD. In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment.
Methods
1999
;
19
:
425
–33.
21
Li ZY, Yang J, Gao X, et al. Sequential recruitment of PCAF and BRG1 contributes to myogenin activation in 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced early differentiation of rhabdomyosarcoma-derived cells.
J Biol Chem
2007
;
282
:
18872
–8.
22
Zijlmans JM, Martens UM, Poon SS, et al. Telomeres in the mouse have large inter-chromosomal variations in the number of T2AG3 repeats.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1997
;
94
:
7423
–8.
23
Eto I. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the promoter region of mouse cyclin D1 gene: implication in phorbol ester-induced tumour promotion.
Cell Prolif
2000
;
33
:
167
–87.
24
Peralta RC, Casson AG, Wang RN, Keshavjee S, Redston M, Bapat B. Distinct regions of frequent loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 5p and 5q in human esophageal cancer.
Int J Cancer
1998
;
78
:
600
–5.
25
Wu X, Zhao Y, Kemp BL, Amos CI, Siciliano MJ, Spitz MR. Chromosome 5 aberrations and genetic predisposition to lung cancer.
Int J Cancer
1998
;
79
:
490
–3.
26
Brezinova J, Zemanova Z, Cermak J, Michalova K. Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmation of 5q deletions in patients with hematological malignancies.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
2000
;
117
:
45
–9.
27
Assoian RK. Anchorage-dependent cell cycle progression.
J Cell Biol
1997
;
136
:
1
–4.
28
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression.
Genes Dev
1999
;
13
:
1501
–12.
29
Walker JL, Assoian RK. Integrin-dependent signal transduction regulating cyclin D1 expression and G1 phase cell cycle progression.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2005
;
24
:
383
–93.
30
Welsh CF. Rho GTPases as key transducers of proliferative signals in G1 cell cycle regulation.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
2004
;
84
:
33
–42.
31
Hunter T, Pines J. Cyclins and cancer. II: cyclin D and CDK inhibitors come of age.
Cell
1994
;
79
:
573
–82.
32
Wang TC, Cardiff RD, Zukerberg L, Lees E, Arnold A, Schmidt EV. Mammary hyperplasia and carcinoma in MMTV-cyclin D1 transgenic mice.
Nature
1994
;
369
:
669
–71.
33
Robles AI, Rodriguez-Puebla ML, Glick AB, et al. Reduced skin tumor development in cyclin D1-deficient mice highlights the oncogenic ras pathway in vivo.
Genes Dev
1998
;
12
:
2469
–74.
34
Yu Q, Geng Y, Sicinski P. Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 ablation.
Nature
2001
;
411
:
1017
–21.
35
Shaywitz AJ, Greenberg ME. CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals.
Annu Rev Biochem
1999
;
68
:
821
–61.
36
Rosenberg D, Groussin L, Jullian E, Perlemoine K, Bertagna X, Bertherat J. Role of the PKA-regulated transcription factor CREB in development and tumorigenesis of endocrine tissues.
Ann N Y Acad Sci
2002
;
968
:
65
–74.
37
Shankar DB, Cheng JC, Kinjo K, et al. The role of CREB as a proto-oncogene in hematopoiesis and in acute myeloid leukemia.
Cancer Cell
2005
;
7
:
351
–62.
38
Delghandi MP, Johannessen M, Moens U. The cAMP signalling pathway activates CREB through PKA, p38 and MSK1 in NIH 3T3 cells.
Cell Signal
2005
;
17
:
1343
–51.
39
Caravatta L, Sancilio S, di Giacomo V, Rana R, Cataldi A, Di Pietro R. PI3-K/Akt-dependent activation of cAMP-response element-binding (CREB) protein in Jurkat T leukemia cells treated with TRAIL.
J Cell Physiol
2008
;
214
:
192
–200.
40
Jefford CE, Irminger-Finger I. Mechanisms of chromosome instability in cancers.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
2006
;
59
:
1
–14.
41
Nowak MA, Komarova NL, Sengupta A, et al. The role of chromosomal instability in tumor initiation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2002
;
99
:
16226
–31.
42
Fukasawa K. Oncogenes and tumour suppressors take on centrosomes.
Nat Rev Cancer
2007
;
7
:
911
–24.
43
Schneider D, Kleeff J, Berberat PO, et al. Induction and expression of βig-h3 in pancreatic cancer cells.
Biochim Biophys Acta
2002
;
1588
:
1
–6. 1.
44
Ivanov SV, Ivanova AV, Salnikow K, Timofeeva O, Subramaniam M, Lerman MI. Two novel VHL targets, TGFBI (BIGH3) and its transactivator KLF10, are up-regulated in renal clear cell carcinoma and other tumors.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
2008
;
370
:
536
–40.
45
Ma C, Rong Y, Radiloff DR, et al. Extracellular matrix protein βig-h3/TGFBI promotes metastasis of colon cancer by enhancing cell extravasation.
Genes Dev
2008
;
22
:
308
–21.
46
Kannabiran C, Klintworth GK. TGFBI gene mutations in corneal dystrophies.
Hum Mutat
2006
;
27
:
615
–25.
47
Bustamante M, Tasinato A, Maurer F, et al. Overexpression of a mutant form of TGFBI/BIGH3 induces retinal degeneration in transgenic mice.
Mol Vis
2008
;
14
:
1129
–37.

Supplementary data