Overexpression of HER-2/neu (c-erbB2) is associated with increased risk of recurrent disease in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and a poorer prognosis in node-positive breast cancer. We therefore examined the early immunotherapeutic targeting of HER-2/neu in DCIS. Before surgical resection, HER-2/neupos DCIS patients (n = 13) received 4 weekly vaccinations of dendritic cells pulsed with HER-2/neu HLA class I and II peptides. The vaccine dendritic cells were activated in vitro with IFN-γ and bacterial lipopolysaccharide to become highly polarized DC1-type dendritic cells that secrete high levels of interleukin-12p70 (IL-12p70). Intranodal delivery of dendritic cells supplied both antigenic stimulation and a synchronized preconditioned burst of IL-12p70 production directly to the anatomic site of T-cell sensitization. Before vaccination, many subjects possessed HER-2/neu–HLA-A2 tetramer-staining CD8pos T cells that expressed low levels of CD28 and high levels of the inhibitory B7 ligand CTLA-4, but this ratio inverted after vaccination. The vaccinated subjects also showed high rates of peptide-specific sensitization for both IFN-γ–secreting CD4pos (85%) and CD8pos (80%) T cells, with recognition of antigenically relevant breast cancer lines, accumulation of T and B lymphocytes in the breast, and induction of complement-dependent, tumor-lytic antibodies. Seven of 11 evaluable patients also showed markedly decreased HER-2/neu expression in surgical tumor specimens, often with measurable decreases in residual DCIS, suggesting an active process of “immunoediting” for HER-2/neu–expressing tumor cells following vaccination. DC1 vaccination strategies may therefore have potential for both the prevention and the treatment of early breast cancer. [Cancer Res 2007;67(4):1842–52]
Therapeutic anticancer vaccines hold great promise for the control of malignancies, but there is no clear consensus about how they may best be optimized. For example, controversies exist relating to whether vaccines should be deployed primarily against early- versus late-stage (i.e., metastatic) disease (1). Additionally, there are unresolved issues surrounding the selection of appropriate tumor target antigens. With respect to dendritic cell–based vaccines, there is little agreement about which dendritic cell properties best promote therapeutic efficacy, the culture and activation regimens best suited to maximize these properties, or the optimal route of vaccine delivery (2–4).
Despite this general lack of consensus, it could be reasonably argued that early disease settings represent promising opportunities for successful immunotherapy, due in part to the absence of both bulky disease and the negative consequences of prior radiation treatments or chemotherapy (5). In addition, vaccine efficacy may be enhanced by antigen selection that includes proteins linked to tumor aggressiveness and survival, as well as the capacity to stimulate both CD8pos and CD4pos T cells. Furthermore, dendritic cells that secrete high levels of interleukin (IL)-12p70 may offer unique advantages, due to their ability to maximize IFN-γ production and functional avidity in T cells (6), provided issues of “dendritic cell exhaustion” are addressed (7). Finally, because the immune system evolved primarily to respond against microbial invasion, dendritic cell–based anticancer vaccine strategies may be potentiated by the inclusion of Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists as dendritic cell activators (8). This may be especially beneficial when overexpressed, but nonmutated proteins, such as HER-2/neu, are used as vaccine antigens because mimicking infectious nonself may facilitate the breaking of tolerance.
We report here preliminary results for the first 13 subjects in a clinical trial to vaccinate against ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a preinvasive malignancy of the breast. This strategy focused on HER-2/neu–expressing tumors, due to this frequent association of protein with poorer prognosis (9), and the availability of both MHC class II– and class I–restricted immunogenic peptides. We also used a DC1 polarization culture technique, including TLR agonist exposure [bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)], to exploit the potential benefits of signaling infectious nonself and to assure robust IL-12 secretion at the time of vaccination. This unique activation strategy actually preconditioned dendritic cells for an apparent second burst of IL-12 if these cells subsequently encountered CD40 ligand. Injecting the vaccines directly into lymph nodes also delivered a defined quantity of freshly antigen-loaded dendritic cells directly to the site of T-cell sensitization and within the time frame of IL-12 secretion bursts. The prescheduled resection of tumor following vaccinations also afforded the opportunity for quantitative histologic analyses of the effects of immunotherapy.
To date, this vaccination strategy has yielded very high rates of T-cell sensitization against both peptide and tumor targets and generated complement-fixing, tumor-lytic antibodies. We have also observed reductions in extent of DCIS and levels of expression of HER-2 after vaccination in several of the subjects. These early results suggest that this strategy may have direct implications for both prevention and therapy of breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
Clinical trial design. Patients with histologically confirmed DCIS with HER-2/neu overexpression (>2+ intensity) in at least 10% of cells [assayed by HercepTest and verified by single pathologist (P.J.Z.)] were recruited to this Institutional Review Board–approved clinical trial. Subjects were screened by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before enrollment to eliminate individuals with obvious areas of invasive disease in either breast. Only patients requiring further surgical therapy for DCIS were eligible for neoadjuvant administration of study vaccine. All patients underwent cardiac evaluation with multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiography to document adequate baseline cardiac function. These scans were done before the first dose of vaccine and within 2 weeks of the final dose. All patients underwent HLA class I tissue typing pre-enrollment and had routine history, physical exams, EKG, blood work, and urinalysis before vaccination. After obtaining informed consent, all patients had a prevaccine leukapheresis done to obtain sufficient numbers of monocytes for vaccine preparation; in a few cases, a second pheresis was required for additional monocytes. A postvaccination pheresis was also done, usually within 2 weeks of the final vaccination, to obtain postimmunization lymphocytes for evaluation. All patients underwent postvaccine mammography, MRI, and surgical resection of DCIS with either lumpectomy or mastectomy. An interim analysis for feasibility was planned after the first nine patients were enrolled.
Materials and reagents. All HER-2/neu–derived peptides were purchased from the American Peptide Corp. (Sunnyvale, CA). Serum-free medium (SFM) monocyte-macrophage medium and Iscove's medium was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Lymphocyte separation medium was obtained from ICN Inc. (Aurora, OH). Human AB serum and FCS were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Reagents for ELISA assays were obtained from PharMingen (San Jose, CA). Clinical grade IFN-γ was purchased from Intermune (Brisbane, CA) and clinical grade LPS was obtained from NIH (Bethesda, MD) through generous gift from Dr. Anthony Suffredini. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for vaccine production was purchased from Berlex (Richmond, CA). The CD40 ligand trimer was a generous gift from Amgen. Antibodies for flow cytometry were purchased from Berlex (Richmond, CA). HER-2/neu (369–377) MHC tetramer was purchased from Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, CA).
Vaccination procedure. Vaccines were administered in the NIH General Research Center at the University of Pennsylvania. The vaccines consisted of 10 to 20 million HER-2/neu–pulsed DC1 cells suspended in 1-mL sterile saline. The vaccines were administered by Ultrasound guidance into a single lymph node in each groin as described previously (4), half of each vaccine was placed into each node with a 22-g needle. The first nine subjects were observed for 2 h after vaccination with routine vital signs obtained at 15-min intervals. Subsequent subjects were observed for 1 h. Vaccines were administered once weekly for 4 weeks. All subjects completed all four scheduled vaccines.
Preparation of HER-2/neu–pulsed DC1. All patients underwent initial leukapheresis on Baxter CS3000 using monocyte enrichment settings in the Apheresis Unit at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. The apheresis product was then elutriated using Beckman Elutriator in the Cell Processing Facility as described previously (10). DC1 were prepared under Investigational New Drug (IND) BB-11043 under good clinical practice conditions. Monocytes were transferred to the Clinical Cell and Vaccine Production Facility where they were washed, counted, and either cryopreserved for later use or vaccine was directly prepared. DC1 were prepared using a rapid activation protocol described previously (6). Monocytes were cultured at 3 × 106/mL in monocyte-macrophage SFM, in sterile 24-well plates with GM-CSF overnight at 37°C. The next morning, monocyte pools were pulsed with one of six HER-2/neu MHC class II binding peptides, three extracellular domain (ECD) peptides (42–56, 98–114, and 328–345), and three intracellular domain (ICD) peptides (776–790, 927–941, and 1166–1180). After 8 to 12 h of further incubation, IFN-γ (1,000 units/mL) was added and cells were subsequently cultured overnight. Six hours before harvest, LPS was added at 10 ng/mL. If the patient was HLA-A2pos, the monocyte pools were divided in half and each was pulsed with either MHC class I binding peptide 369 to 377 (11) or 689 to 697. The cells were harvested 2 h later, washed, counted, assessed for viability, and placed in a final administration volume of 1 mL in sterile saline. Samples of the vaccine were sent for bacterial and endotoxin testing. Lot release criteria required a viability of >70% as assessed by trypan blue dye exclusion, gram stain negative, and an endotoxin level of <5 endotoxin units/kg. Vaccines were evaluated for functional activation by flow cytometry and aliquots of monocyte medium were cryopreserved to assess IL-12p70 production by ELISA as described previously (6). All vaccines prepared met all release criteria. Vaccines 2 to 4 were prepared as above using cryopreserved monocytes.
Flow cytometry. Analysis of surface markers CD14-FITC, CD80-PE, CD86-PE, and CD83-PE was done on a FACSCalibur and analyzed using CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
Tetramer staining. Prevaccination or postvaccination CD8pos T cells were either thawed and analyzed or sensitized by dendritic cells pulsed with the peptide HER-2/neu p369 to 377 for 10 days as described below. They were then harvested and stained with allophycocyanin (APC)–labeled HER-2/neu p369 to 377 tetramer and anti-CD8-FITC, anti-CD28-PE, or anti-CTLA-4-PE for 30 min. Cells were washed and subjected to flow cytometry analysis. APC-labeled MART-1 p27-35 tetramer was used for background control.
Enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Anti-IFN-γ antibody was purchased from Mabtech, Inc. (Mariemont, OH) and the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay was done according the manufacturer's instructions. Multiscreen filter plates (MAIPSWU10) were purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA). Substrate solution (TMB-H) was purchased from Moss (Pasadena, MD). Coating antibody (1-D1K) was diluted to 12 μg/mL in sterile PBS. The ELISPOT plates were prewet with 70% ethanol for 1 min at room temperature and washed five times with sterile water. After addition of the coating antibody (100 μL/well), the plates were incubated overnight at 4°C to 8°C. The plates were washed five times with sterile PBS before the addition of 200 μL/well of culture medium. After blocking for >30 min, the medium was removed. CD4 cells were added with either immature or mature dendritic cells, pulsed with the ICD and ECD peptides (total of 150 μL/well) at a ratio of 1 × 105 to 2 × 104. Tetanus was used as control stimulus. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 20 h. The plates were then washed five times with 200 μL PBS. One hundred microliters of detection antibody (7-B6-1-biotin) diluted to 1 μg/mL in PBS with 0.5% FCS were added to each well. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After washing five times, 1:1,000 diluted streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase in PBS with 0.5% FCS was added before incubation for an additional hour. The plates were washed and 100 μL of substrate solution were added to each well. After color development, wells were rigidly washed with tap water. The plates were dried at room temperature and read in an ELISPOT reader (Immunospot CTL, Cleveland, OH). At routine intervals, the relative coefficient of variance was determined. The maximum value was 23% (1,029 ± 63.34 = 0.448%; 993 ± 71 = 3.18%; 635 ± 1.52 = 0.09%; 596 ± 35.2 = 2.4%; 99 ± 23.8 = 12%; and 120 ± 55.25 = 23%).
CD4pos T-cell in vitro sensitization. CD4pos T cells from thawed prevaccination or postvaccination lymphocytes were prepared with negative selection columns as described previously (6). CD4pos T cells were sensitized by autologous dendritic cells pulsed with either HER-2/neu ECD or ICD peptides at a ratio of 10:1. IL-2 (60 IU/mL) was added to the cultures the next day. T cells were harvested on day 10 and tested for their antigen specificity. CD4pos T cells (105) were cocultured with dendritic cells (104) pulsed with HER-2/neu peptides or dendritic cells pulsed with B-Raf kinase in 96-well plates. After 24 h of coculture, supernatants were harvested and IFN-γ release was measured by ELISA.
CD8pos T-cell sensitization. Autologous dendritic cells were pulsed with HER-2/neu p369 to 377 or p689 to 697 at 10 μg/mL 2 h before harvest. Dendritic cells were then cocultured with column-purified prevaccination or postvaccination CD8pos T cells at a ratio of 10:1 in 48-well plates. IL-2 (30 IU/mL) was added to the cultures on day 2. After 10 days of sensitization, the CD8pos T cells were harvested and restimulated with T2 cells pulsed with either relevant or irrelevant peptides or tested against breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 (HER-2/neuneg and HLA-A2pos), MDA-MB-435S and SK-BR-3 (HER-2/neupos and HLA-A2neg), and ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 (HER-2/neupos– and HLA-0201*–transfected or nontransfected cells; a kind gift of Dr. Mary Disis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA). Supernatants were harvested after 24 h and analyzed by ELISA.
Immunohistochemical staining of DCIS lesions. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were sectioned at 5 μm on plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Hanover Park, IL), Hanover Park, IL. Sections were heated for 1 h at 60°C to remove excess paraffin, cooled for 10 min, and subsequently deparaffinized and rehydrated in a series of xylenes and alcohols. Immunohistochemistry was done using the DAKO Autostainer (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). All tissues were stained for HercepTest (DAKO), CD1a (Novocastra Laboratories, Vision BioSystems, Inc., Norwell, MA), CD3 (Novocastra Laboratories), CD4 (Biocare Medical, Walnut Creek, CA), CD8 (DAKO), CD20 (DAKO), CD45RO (DAKO), CD56 (Monosan, Uden, the Netherlands), CD68 (DAKO), CD69 (LabVision Corp., Neomarkers, Fremont, CA), Granzyme (LabVision, Neomarkers), FoxP3 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), HLA class II (DAKO), and IgG (DAKO).
Complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay. SK-BR-3, a highly positive HER-2/neu–expressing breast cancer cell line, was used as a positive target and the melanoma cell line MEL624-A2neg that does not express HER-2/neu was used as a negative target. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells were plated and incubated overnight at 37°C. Cultures were done in quadruplets. Human serum was inactivated at 56°C for 30 min and diluted 1:2. Fifty microliters of serum were added to the cell cultures for 1 h. Twenty microliters of guinea pig complement (diluted 1:4; Sigma Chemical) was added to half of the wells. The other half served as antibody control. After 4 h, 15 μL WST1 was added to the wells. The plates were analyzed by an ELISA reader at 3 and 4.5 h at a wavelength of 450. The percentage cytotoxicity was calculated using the following formula: [(a − b) / (a − c)] × 100 (where a = cells in antibody only; b = cells in antibody plus complement; and c = medium only).
Statistical methods. To compare the mean number of HER-2/neu 369 to 377 tetramer binding (in 105 CD8pos T cells), between healthy donors and DCIS patients, and to compare HER-2/neu expression on initial biopsy with postsurgical biopsies for the vaccine patients compared with a group of unvaccinated control subjects, a Wilcoxon rank test was used. To compare the initial burst with the additional burst of IL-12 by DC1, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data was used. All significance values were two sided. Statistical analyses were done with SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Vaccine scheme and clinical trial design. Ex vivo activated DC1 (high IL-12–secreting dendritic cells) were prepared from autologous monocytes under Food and Drug Administration IND BB-11043 (Fig. 1A). Dendritic cells were pulsed individually with six MHC class II peptides derived from HER-2/neu as described previously by Disis et al. (12). The dendritic cells of HLA-A2pos subjects were additionally pulsed with two HLA-A2–binding peptides (369–377 and 689–697) shown previously to stimulate CD8pos T cells (13–15). The intention of the combined MHC class II and class I peptide design was to promote CD4pos antigen-specific help for CD8posT cells, partly by fostering an additional in vivo burst of IL-12 production through CD40 ligation of the administered DC1 (Fig. 1B). All patients were treated with 4 weekly HER-2/neu–pulsed autologous DC1 (10–20 million per vaccine) immunizations administered by intranodal route. Following completion of the vaccines, patients underwent immunologic testing followed by definitive surgical therapy. All patients underwent prevaccine and postvaccine cardiac evaluation with MUGA or echocardiogram to assess cardiac changes and vaccine safety. All patients completed the four scheduled vaccinations and vaccines were well tolerated with only CTC grade 1 or 2 toxicity consisting of anticipated low-grade fever, fatigue, chills, nausea, or injection site tenderness. There was no evidence of cardiac toxicity manifested by significant postvaccine ejection fraction on MUGA scan, all of which remained in the reference range or any clinical symptoms during 1 year of follow-up.
Monocytes treated with IFN-γ and TLR-4 agonist LPS show properties of mature polarized DC1. As expected, monocyte-derived dendritic cells from DCIS patients displayed enhanced levels of CD80, CD86, and CD83 when activated with IFN-γ and LPS (Fig. 1C). The dendritic cells also displayed CD40 up-regulation (Fig. 1C). An initial burst of IL-12p70 production (500–10,000 pg/mL) was observed for all patients' dendritic cells, consistent with DC1 polarization (16). To test whether these dendritic cells retained the potential to produce additional IL-12 should they encounter CD4pos CD40Lpos T cells, IFN-γ/LPS–treated dendritic cells were washed and incubated in fresh medium for 12 to 36 h before restimulation solely with recombinant CD40L. The prepared patient dendritic cells could consistently produce an additional IL-12p70 burst (range, 10,000–30,000 pg/mL) that even significantly exceeded the magnitude of the original burst (P = 0.028; Fig. 1D). Hence, in vitro TLR agonist-induced DC1 polarization preconditioned dendritic cells for a second IL-12 burst through subsequent CD40-CD40L interactions (Fig. 1B).
Evidence of negative regulation of anti-HER-2 T cells in patients with DCIS. Peripheral blood CD8pos lymphocytes from patients with DCIS were assessed in the HLA-A2pos cohort before vaccination for preexisting anti-HER-2/neu responses. Compared with healthy donors, there were elevated numbers (mean 77 × 105 for DCIS patients versus mean 36 × 105 for healthy donors; P = 0.033) of HER-2/neu 369 to 377 tetramerpos CD8pos T cells (Fig. 2A). We additionally examined T-cell expression of B7 ligands in this cohort. Before vaccination, tetramer-staining T cells expressed high levels of CTLA-4 (inhibitory signaling) relative to CD28 (activation signaling). After vaccination, however, this ratio became inverted (Fig. 2B). Additionally, in contrast to healthy donors, prevaccine CD8pos T cells sensitized using DC1 pulsed with 369 to 377 class I peptide did not secrete IFN-γ in response to HER-2/neu 369 to 377 pulsed targets except in one subject. However, postvaccine T cells routinely acquired this property (Fig. 2C; Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2). Collectively, these results suggest a negative regulatory mechanism(s) for T cells naturally sensitized to HER-2/neu that was operative even at very early (preinvasive) stages of cancer, but which could be reversed by DC1 vaccination.
DC1 vaccines induce HER-2/neu–reactive CD4pos T cells. We evaluated CD4pos anti-HER-2/neu responses by two methods. The first method used was ELISPOT to quantify T cells in peripheral blood without in vitro expansion. The second was an in vitro sensitization assay (IVS), in which lymphocytes were first stimulated and expanded for one round (10 days) in vitro and then restimulated and assessed by ELISA for secreted IFN-γ. Both assays used HER-2/neu peptide-loaded dendritic cells as stimulators. A summary of all patient immune responses is summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Of 11 testable subjects, 10 (91%) had >5-fold postvaccination increases in the number of IFN-γ spots against at least one MHC class II–restricted HER-2/neu peptide epitope, and the observed increases were usually of an even greater magnitude (Fig. 3A). A representative comparison of absolute numbers of IFN-γ secretion spots is shown for subject 08102-05 (Fig. 3B). To determine whether such increases in spot number were a specific consequence of vaccination, we also tested the prevaccine and postvaccine response when tetanus-pulsed dendritic cells were used as stimulators. The ratios of postvaccine to prevaccine tetanus-specific IFN-γ spots were consistently in the 1 to 2 range, indicating absent or scant modulation by the vaccine procedure (Fig. 3A). When assayed by IVS instead of by ELISPOT, 10 of 13 (77%) subjects responded to HER-2/neu peptides after vaccination with greater than a 2-fold increase in IFN-γ secretion compared with control peptides (Fig. 3C and D). Most of the subjects developed responses to more than one of the six MHC class II peptides used (Fig. 3). As anticipated, ELISPOT and IVS results did not always precisely concur, due to repertoire disparities between uncultured and culture-proliferated cells (17), but these dual analyses corroborated vaccine responsiveness to at least one MHC class II–restricted HER-2/neu peptide epitope for 11 of 13 (85%) patients (Fig. 3). Furthermore, a consistent absence of detectable IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 production indicated that such CD4pos T-cell responsiveness reflected a strongly polarized TH1 phenotype (data not shown).
HER-2/neu–pulsed DC1 vaccines induce CD8pos T cells that directly recognize HER-2/neu–overexpressing breast cancer lines. We observed an increase in the numbers of 369 to 377 peptide tetramerpos CD8pos T cells in most patients following vaccination (Fig. 4A), with further amplification of tetramer-binding frequency, following in vitro stimulation with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells. Despite this, one of the ten HLA-A2pos subjects' displayed prevaccination evidence of CD8pos T cells capable of IFN-γ secretion in response to HER-2/neu 369 to 377 peptide-pulsed targets (data not shown). However, eight of nine (88%) patients acquired such reactivity to peptide 369 to 377 following vaccination (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Fig. S2), and five of nine patients developed reactivity to peptide 689 to 697 (Supplementary Fig. S2). Perhaps, most importantly, postvaccination CD8pos T cells from all subjects that developed peptide recognizing CD8 T cells recognized HLA-A2pos HER-2/neu–expressing tumor lines (Fig. 4C). Such T cells did not respond to the HLA-A2neg or HER-2/neuneg control tumor cell lines, indicating HER-2/neu specificity and HLA-A2 restriction. The acquisition of direct tumor reactivity was not evident before completion of all four vaccinations, although reactivity to peptide-pulsed T2 cells was often already prominent following first vaccination (Fig. 4D). It is worth noting that direct recognition of antigen-expressing tumor cells by peptide-sensitized CD8pos T cells has historically been difficult to show and that our previous in vitro work predicted high rates of direct tumor recognition when IL-12–secreting dendritic cells were used for vaccination.
HER-2/neu–pulsed-DC1 vaccines lead to accumulation of lymphocytes in the breast and changes in residual DCIS. All enrolled subjects required conventional definitive surgery after vaccination to remove residual DCIS, based on the initial surgical (subjects 1, 3, 4, 10, 11, and 14) or core (subjects 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, and 13) biopsies. Eleven of 13 subjects showed residual DCIS at the time of postvaccine surgery. The remaining two had either no residual disease (subject 08102-04) or inadequate tissue (subject 08102-01) to do HER-2/neu expression analysis (see below).
Immunohistochemical analysis of prevaccination biopsies showed variable lymphocytic infiltrates in the breast tissue with some patients showing minimal or moderate infiltrates, such as shown in Fig. 5A (including CD4pos T cells and B cells). However, in most patients, there was a marked postvaccination increase in lymphocytic infiltration with cells congregating at periductal sites surrounding regions of residual DCIS (Fig. 5A). The infiltrate consisted largely of CD4pos T cells and CD20pos B cells with few CD8pos T cells (Fig. 5A; Supplementary Fig. S3) and minimal or no natural killer cells, macrophages, or dendritic cells detected. Some lymphocytes (CD45ROpos and CD4pos) seemed to enter the ducts and comingle with the tumor cells (Fig. 5A,, bottom). There was little evidence of Foxp3pos cells in the breast either prevaccine or postvaccine, suggesting these negative regulatory cells play little role in DCIS (Fig. 5A , bottom).
We then compared HER-2/neu expression before and after vaccination to determine whether apparent immune pressure altered target antigen expression on remaining tumor cells. We observed pronounced declines in HER-2/neu staining in 7 of 11 subjects compared with no decline in an unvaccinated control group of HER-2/neu–overexpressing DCIS patients that also underwent an initial biopsy before definitive surgical resection (Fig. 5B). In three subjects who exhibited loss of HER-2/neu, confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was done to test residual HER-2/neu gene amplification. For two of these three, FISH analysis confirmed the loss of HER-2/neu initially shown by immunohistochemistry, but the third (08102-06) remained strongly FISH positive (data not shown).
Microcalcifications, formed within areas of high-grade comedonecrosis DCIS and visualized by mammography, can predict the minimum extent of DCIS (actual tumors often extend beyond microcalcifications) with a positive predictive value of 0.9 (18–20). We used microcalcifications to estimate the extent of disease and confirmed these findings with MRI. For 6 of the 11 (55%) patients with microcalcifications, the actual tumor removed at the time of definitive surgery was significantly smaller (>50% smaller) than the area predicted by microcalcifications on postbiopsy mammograms (Fig. 5C), suggesting tumor regression. Notably, five of these seven subjects were among the seven shown to have decreased HER-2/neu staining on residual tumor cells (exception, 08102-06 no decrease in extent; 08102-14 no calcification). Examples of this loss visualized by immunohistochemical staining are shown for subjects 08102-02 and 08102-09 (Fig. 6A). For subject 08102-09, there was decreased staining intensity plus a postvaccination redistribution of remaining HER-2/neu staining in cellular vacuoles compared with the uniform 3+ membrane staining in the prevaccine biopsy (Fig. 6A).
DC1 vaccines induce complement-dependent antibody-mediated cell cytotoxicity. The presence of DCIS trafficking B cells and IFN-γ–secreting T cells prompted us to assess the activity of prevaccine and postvaccine sera in a complement-dependent, tumor-lytic assay (Fig. 6B). Postvaccine serum from six of the nine available subjects showed elevated complement-dependent in vitro lysis of HER-2/neupos but not HER-2/neupos tumor cell lines. It is notable that four of these six subjects (08102-02, 08102-03, 08102-05, and 08102-09) were among the subjects displaying decreased HER-2/neu staining and smaller areas of DCIS than predicted by areas of microcalcifications. Subject 08102-11 did not develop peritumoral lymphocytic infiltrates despite the presence of serum antibody. In contrast, the anti-HER-2/neu antibody-based therapeutic agent trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; refs. 21–30) did not induce complement-mediated lysis of HER-2/neu–expressing breast cancer cells (Fig. 6B).
We next did immunohistochemistry staining to determine whether the endogenously produced antibody actually bound to tumor in vivo. Here, prevaccine and postvaccine DCIS samples from one subject (08102-09) with residual high-grade HER-2/neu–expressing DCIS were stained with antihuman IgG. We found minimal evidence of IgG bound to tumor before vaccination, but after vaccination, DCIS cells showed strong anti-IgG staining (Fig. 6C). This shows that endogenous and, apparently, vaccine-induced antibodies bind directly to tumor targets, consistent with a breaking of tolerance. These data further suggest that some of the apparent loss of HER-2/neu staining could be a result of competition from the patients' own antibody. However, these complement-fixing antibodies may also represent a tumor rejection mechanism predicted by HER-2/neu transgenic mouse models (31–36).
Although definitive conclusions cannot yet be drawn, loss of HER-2/neu expression and apparent tumor regression for DCIS suggests a potential for HER-2/neu DC1 vaccines to improve prognosis and act as adjuncts to breast-conserving surgical strategies. Our method was structured to deliver antigen-pulsed, polarized DC1, such that IL-12p70 bursts coincided with in vivo T-cell encounters in the lymph nodes. The initial IL-12 burst was triggered by an exposure to a TLR agonist, which preconditioned dendritic cell preparations for a delayed IL-12 burst if CD40 ligation was done up to 36 h later (Fig. 1D). This delayed IL-12 burst in vitro suggests that initial exposure to TLR agonists in vivo, followed by later CD40 ligation (from activated CD4pos CD40Lpos helper T cells), may reflect a physiologic signaling sequence that either licenses repetitive IL-12 production from the same population of dendritic cells (thereby postponing dendritic cells exhaustion; ref. 7) or recruits a second population of dendritic cells that did not participate in the initial round of IL-12 secretion. Whatever the precise mechanism, the strategic preconditioning of such clinically desirable DC1 events may contribute substantially to subsequent dendritic cells performance.
In the preliminary evaluation of this trial, our vaccination strategy resulted in induction of CD4pos IFN-γpos Th1 cells, peritumoral lymphocytic infiltrates (B cells and CD4pos and CD8pos T cells), complement-dependent tumor-lytic antibodies, and measurable reductions in DCIS. Previous studies have linked lymphocytic tumor infiltrates with better prognosis (37, 38) and HER-2/neu transgenic mouse models have elucidated the roles of B cells (antibody) and CD4pos T cells (with less role for CD8pos CTL) in tumor rejection (32, 33). It is remarkable, however, that these changes, including clinically apparent reductions in DCIS for half the subjects, were induced in little over 4 weeks by a well-tolerated, weekly DC1 vaccination regimen. Interestingly, antibody bound directly to tumor (indicating an in vivo breakdown of tolerance) could be shown after vaccination, although whether the role of tumor-trafficking B cells is to locally increase antibody concentration or to serve as APC is yet to be determined.
For therapeutic cancer vaccines, breaking tolerance is essential, especially because active mechanisms seem to be in place to dampen immunity even at the early DCIS stage. For example, peptide- and tumor-reactive CD8pos T cells from healthy donors could be sensitized against HER-2/neu peptides in a single round of in vitro stimulation (6), but T cells from prevaccine DCIS patients could not (Fig. 2C). Prevaccine HER-2/neu tetramerpos T cells also expressed relatively high levels of CTLA-4 (associated with inhibitory signaling) and comparatively low levels of CD28 (activation signaling). After vaccination, this ratio inverted, and peptide- and tumor-reactive T cells were easily expanded from peripheral blood (as with healthy donors). Interestingly, we have shown previously that IL-12 production by dendritic cells radically enhances functional avidity and tumor-killing capacity of CD8pos cells (6). Therefore, expression ratios for CD28 and CTLA-4 may reflect yet another mechanism by which CD8pos T-cell peripheral tolerance is regulated.
The preliminary results of this trial suggest that a focus on combined early disease settings and neoadjuvant therapy may have therapeutic effect, as well as permit meaningful study of modulations in cellular trafficking, tolerance, and changes in tumor antigen expression as a consequence of vaccination. Indeed, the selection of tumor vaccine antigens based on their role in the development and maintenance of disease may be of critical importance (39–45). The immune system has been shown naturally to sculpt characteristics of emerging tumors during carcinogenesis, supplying a natural selective force that eliminates more immunogenic phenotypes. This process, termed “immunoediting” (46, 47), may slow tumor growth initially but, in the long run, probably causes less immunogenic, more aggressive tumors. The approach of DC1 vaccination for HER-2/neupos early breast cancer could have the potential to reverse this course by purposefully and selectively targeting the more aggressive HER-2/neupos phenotype. This strategy may therefore be considered “targeted immunoediting.” Further investigations using the general methods and strategies examined in this study are warranted, both in patients with more advanced breast cancer and in patients with other malignancies.
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
Current address for G.K. Koski: Center for Surgery Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.
This article is dedicated to the memory of Charley Carter (1952–2006) who was instrumental in developing the elutriation procedure for preparing the dendritic cell vaccines.
Grant support: NIH grant R01-CA096997-02 and the American Cancer Society grants RSG 99-029-04-LIB (B.J. Czerniecki) and CA100163 (G.K. Koski).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank the outstanding efforts of the personnel of the Leukapheresis Unit, the Cell Processing Facility, and the Clinical Cell and Vaccine Production Facility, as well as the staffs of the NIH General Clinical Research Center, the Rena Rowan Breast Center, and the Department of Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania; Vickie Salle, Patricia Rahill, Nancy O'Connor, Janine Devine, and Antonietta D'Addio, without whom this clinical trial would not be possible, for invaluable assistance; Dr. Suyu Shu of the Cleveland Clinic for helpful suggestions and discussions; and Susan B. Komen Foundation and the Harrington Foundation for the support.