Abstract
6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (CD437/AHPN) and 4-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-3-chlorocinnamic acid (3-Cl-AHPC/MM002) are inducers of apoptosis of malignant cells both in vitro and in vivo. Numerous mechanisms have been proposed for how these compounds exert this effect. This report shows that AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC binds specifically to the orphan nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2), and this binding promotes interaction of the receptor with a corepressor complex that minimally contains Sin3A, N-CoR, histone deacetylase 4, and HSP90. Formation of the SHP-Sin3A complex is essential for the ability of AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC to induce apoptosis, as both knockout SHP and knockdown of Sin3A compromise the proapoptotic activity of these compounds but not other apoptosis inducers. These results suggest that AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC and their analogues are SHP ligands and their induction of apoptosis is mediated by their binding to the SHP receptor. [Cancer Res 2007;67(1):318–25]
Introduction
The ability of the novel retinoid 6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (CD437/AHPN) to induce apoptosis in several different malignant cells has been well described (1–4). This observation led to the synthesis and development of a unique class of compounds, which are potent inducers of apoptosis and have been called retinoid-related molecules. The essential pharmacophoric elements in the AHPN scaffold necessary for apoptosis induction are the hydrophobic 1-adamantyl group, its adjacent hydrogen-donating hydroxyl group, and a distant carboxylic acid group (5). These compounds have also been shown to induce cell death in several animal models (1–7). Although some members of this class may bind and activate the nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RAR), recent data suggested that these compounds induce cell death through mechanisms that do not involve the RARs or the retinoid X receptors (RXR; refs. 8, 9). Further support for this premise was derived from the observation that the AHPN analogue 4-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-3-chlorocinnamic acid (3-Cl-AHPC/MM002), which binds to but does not activate the RARs, is a potent inducer of apoptosis (10). The mechanism by which AHPN and its analogues induce apoptosis remains unclear, although numerous potential pathways have been suggested (11–13). Our binding studies using labeled AHPN and nuclear extracts suggested the presence of a novel AHPN receptor (14). To further characterize this potential AHPN receptor, nuclear proteins, which specifically bound to AHPN linked to a Sepharose affinity support, were identified; one such protein was SAP18, a member of the mammalian Sin3A complex (15).
Mammalian Sin3A is a 145-kDa protein, which, through its interaction with selective proteins and histone deacetylases (HDAC), represses the expression of a large number of genes. Three classes of Sin3A-associated proteins have been identified. The first class of proteins consists of histone/chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as HDAC1, HDAC2, Swi/Snf, O-linked N-acetylglucosamine methyltransferase, and histone methyltransferases (16). The second class consists of a large number of DNA-binding transcription factors, which, when bound to their appropriate consensus sequences in association with Sin3A, results in gene repression. Finally, several docking proteins for specific repressor components are found in the Sin3A complex; these include SAP45 and SAP30, which mediate the association of Sin3A with HDAC1 and HDAC2 and other proteins (16, 17). Recently, the binding of the orphan nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2) to the Sin3A complex has been described (18, 19). SHP is a unique nuclear receptor, which lacks a DNA-binding domain but contains a putative ligand-binding domain. SHP has been proposed to interact with and inhibit the transcriptional activities of other nuclear proteins (20, 21).
We have now found that AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC and their analogues specifically bind to SHP, resulting in the recruitment of a complex that minimally contains Sin3A, N-CoR, HDAC4, and HSP90 to the liganded receptor. Moreover, we found that AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC enhanced binding of this SHP-Sin3A complex to the c-Myc promoter, resulting in transcriptional repression. Finally, both SHP and Sin3A were found to be necessary for AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC–induced apoptosis, suggesting that this complex is central to the proapoptotic action of these compounds.
Materials and Methods
Materials/antibodies. 3-Cl-AHPC, (E)-4-[3′-(1-adamantyl)-4′-hydroxyphenyl]-3-(3′-acetamidopropyloxy)cinnamic acid (3-A-AHPC) and [5,5′-3H2]AHPN, were synthesized as described previously (14, 22, 23). [11,12-3H2]tRA was purchased from Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). DMEM-F12, fetal bovine serum, and Trizol reagent were purchased from Invitrogen, Inc. (Grand Island, NY). Anti-c-Myc antibody was obtained from NeoMarkers (Fremont, CA) or Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-mSin3A, anti-N-CoR, anti-GADD45, anti-HDAC1, anti-HDAC2, anti-HDAC4, anti-HSP90, and anti-SHP antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. α-Tubulin antibody was from Oncogene Research Products (Boston, MA). HDAC colorimetric activity assay kit was purchased from Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA), and geldanamycin was obtained from the NIH (Bethesda, MD).
Cell culture and apoptosis. The human leukemia cell lines HL-60R and KG-1 and the breast carcinoma cell line MDA-MB-468 were maintained in RPMI 1640 and DMEM-F12, respectively, as described (10, 23). We have previously described our generation of the wild-type and SHP knockout cells (24). Apoptosis was assessed either using acridine orange staining or using ELISA apoptosis kits obtained from Roche Diagnostic Laboratory (Indianapolis, IN; ref. 22). The vehicle was 0.1% DMSO and 3-Cl-AHPC and AHPN were added to a final concentration of 1 μmol/L and [5,5′-3H2]AHPN was added to a final concentration of 5 nmol/L unless otherwise stated.
Binding assay. Binding of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN to glutathione S-transferase (GST)-SHP and fractionation over G25 Sephadex were done as we have previously published (14). In the immunoprecipitation binding assays, specific primary antibodies (1 μg) were added in 200 to 500 μg nuclear extracts in binding buffer containing labeled and nonlabeled ligands and incubated at 4°C for 2 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared using the method of Ausubel et al. (25). Protein G-Sepharose Cl-4B (20 μL) was then added and washed thrice with binding buffer. Washed beads were added directly to the scintillation liquid or the [5,5′-3H2]AHPN (CD437) was eluted using elution buffer (50 mmol/L NaHCO3 and 1% SDS), and the eluate was added to the scintillation fluid to assess bound radioactivity. In the GST-SHP binding assays, glutathione-Sepharose bead-bound GST-SHP (0.5–0.7 μg) was used in the GST-SHP binding assays.
Radioligand binding data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Saturation radioligand binding data were analyzed by fitting an equation for one site binding hyperbola to the untransformed data: Y = Bmax × X / (KD + X).
This describes the binding of a ligand to a receptor that follows the law of mass action. Bmax is the maximal binding of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN and KD is the concentration of ligand required to reach half-maximal binding. Linear regression was used to analyze transformed data in Scatchard plots.
Correlation of binding to GST-SHP protein and level of apoptosis induction were examined using 3-Cl-AHPC and several analogues: (E)-2-4-(4-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-3-chlorophenyl)ethylenyl-5-tetrazole (BI-2002), 5-(4-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-3-chlorophenyl)methylenethiazoleidene-2,4-dione (BI-2003), (E)-3-2-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4hydroxyphenyl]pyrimidinyl)propenoic acid (BI-2005), (E)-4-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-3-chlorocinnamyl hydroxamic acid (BI-2007), (E)-2-(4-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-3-chlorophenyl)ethyleneboronic acid (BI-2009), and 3-A-AHPC. [5,5′-3H2]AHPN was added to a concentration of 5 nmol/L, whereas competing nonlabeled 3-Cl-AHPC analogues were added to a final concentration of 50 μmol/L. Each point represents the mean value for each analogue determined from three independent experiments. The correlation coefficient and P were determined using Pearson correlation analysis.
Western blots. Western blots, RNA preparation, and Northern blots were done as we have previously described (26).
HDAC assay. Histone deacetylation activation assays were done using the HDAC colorimetric assay kit and the manufacturer's instructions. Sin3A was immunoprecipitated from 500 μg nuclear extracts and added to 1 mmol/L substrate for each HDAC activation assay in 96-well microtiter plates; the HDAC activity was measured at 405 nm in a microtiter plate reader.
Small interfering RNA transfection. Cells were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA) using Oligofectamine and Oligofectamine plus reagent according to Elbashir et al. (27) and the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were incubated with two primers, 21-nucleotide RNA with 3′-dAA overhangs synthesized by Dharmacon RNA Technology (Dharmacon Research, Lafayette, CO). The primer sequences were 5′-GGUUGCUCGUCUCUUUAAAAA-3′ (mS3-1) and 5′-UUAUCGUUGUGAAGAUGAAAA-3′ (mS3-2) corresponding to base pair start from 1,342 to 2,086 of the coding sequence of the Sin3A gene (PubMed accession no. NM_015477). The siRNA sequences for human SHP were 5′-GCAGUGGCUUCAAUGCUGUUAA-3′ (si-SHP1) and 5′-CUAUGUGCACCUCAUCGCA-3′ (si-SHP2). Control cells were treated with nontargeting siRNA control duplex sequence from Dharmacon Research. Cells were harvested 24, 48, and 72 h following the transfection to assess protein levels by Western blot. Cells were treated with 1 μmol/L 3-Cl-AHPC after 24 h of transfection and harvested 24 and 48 h after incubation with 1 μmol/L 3-Cl-AHPC for protein and apoptosis assays.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. KG-1 and MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with 1 μmol/L 3-Cl-AHPC for 24 h and proteins were cross-linked to DNA by adding formaldehyde (final concentration of 1%) to the culture medium and fixing at room temperature for 10 min followed by washing twice with cold PBS and then chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were done using a modified procedures of Weinmann et al. (28). The antibody/protein/DNA complex was eluted with elution buffer (50 mmol/L NaHCO3, 1% SDS), and the cross-link was reversed by addition of NaCl to a final concentration of 250 mmol/L, 5 μL proteinase K (15 mg/mL) and 10 μg RNaseA and incubated at 65°C overnight. The samples were extracted with phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol (25:24:1) and then chloroform-isoamylalcohol (24:1). The DNA was precipitated with 3 mol/L sodium acetate (pH 5.3; 1:10 by volume) and 5 μg glycogen, and 1 mL of ethanol precipitate was resuspended with Tris-EDTA buffer and analyzed by PCR. c-Myc primers were designed from the promoter region exon 1 (forward, 5′-ATAATGCGAGGGTCTGGA-3′; reverse, 5′-ATACTCAGCHCGATCCCT-3′) and from the primer set specific for SHP (forward, 5′-CCCAAGATGCTGTGACCTTT-3′; reverse, 5′-CCAGAAGGACTCCAGACAGC-3′). The primer sequences for β-actin were 5′-TCCTTCCTGGGCATGGAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGGAGGAGCAATGATCTT-3′ (reverse).
Results
AHPN binds to a Sin3A complex(es). We previously showed specific binding of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN to nuclear extracts of several malignant cells (14). AHPN binding to specific nuclear proteins was examined using an AHPN affinity column. One of the proteins isolated from this column was SAP18, a member of the Sin3A complex (15). [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to a Sin3A complex was therefore assessed using nuclear extracts from the HL-60 and MDA-MB-468 cell lines as described in Fig. 1. [5,5′-3H2]AHPN was found to bind to the Sin3A complex in a manner that was inhibited by unlabeled AHPN, 3-Cl-AHPC, and the AHPN analogue 3-A-AHPC (Fig. 1A). The specificity of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to the Sin3A complex was further shown by the lack of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to nuclear extracts depleted of Sin3A as well as by the lack of binding to other nuclear proteins, such as the deacetylase SIRT1 and GADD45 (Fig. 1B and C). [5,5′-3H2]AHPN coimmunoprecipitated with N-CoR in MDA-MB-468 where N-CoR was found associated with the Sin3A complex (see Figs. 1C and 2 below), but [5,5′-3H2]AHPN did not coimmunoprecipitate with N-CoR in KG-1 cells where N-CoR was not found in the Sin3A complex (Fig. 1D,, inset). Thus, [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to N-CoR was dependent on N-CoR being part of the Sin3A complex N-CoR. [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to the Sin3A complex was only found when conducted in the presence of nuclear extracts; [5,5′-3H2]AHPN did not display specific binding to the Sin3A complex when it was added after immunoprecipitation of Sin3A, implying that [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to the Sin3A complex requires the association of other nuclear factors with the Sin3A complex (Fig. 1C , lane 5).
AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC recruit proteins to the Sin3A complex and enhances Sin3A-associated HDAC activity. Several approaches were used to determine whether exposure of cells or cell extracts to AHPN or 3-Cl-AHPC resulted in the recruitment of proteins to a Sin3A complex. MDA-MB-468 nuclear extract exposure to 3-Cl-AHPC or AHPN resulted in the recruitment of several proteins to Sin3A, including HDAC4, HSP90, N-CoR, and the N-CoR components TBL1 and GPS2, as identified by silver staining and Western blot (Fig. 2A and B; Supplementary Fig. S2). When MDA-MB-468 cells were incubated with either vehicle or 3-Cl-AHPC for varying times following which the Sin3A complex was immunoprecipitated and Western blots were done, AHPN or 3-Cl-AHPC exposure also resulted in Sin3A recruitment of HDAC4, HSP90, and N-CoR (Fig. 2C). Thus, exposure of nuclear extracts or whole cells to AHPN or 3-Cl-AHPC resulted in Sin3A complex modification. AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC exposure also resulted in a 1.5- and 2-fold increased Sin3A expression in KG-1 and MDA-MB-468 cells, respectively (Fig. 2D).
Sin3A complexes repress gene expression through HDAC1- and HDAC2-mediated histone deacetylation (29). We therefore assessed whether 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated modification of the Sin3A complex resulted in the modulation of the Sin3A-associated HDAC activities. Exposure of MDA-MB-468 cells to 3-Cl-AHPC resulted in a 2-fold increase of HDAC activity in Sin3A immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3A). This increase in Sin3A-associated HDAC activity may be secondary to the 3-Cl-AHPC increase in Sin3A expression.
HSP90 ATPase activity is essential for 3-Cl-AHPC binding to Sin3A- and 3-Cl-AHPC–induced apoptosis. 3-Cl-AHPC exposure resulted in the recruitment of HSP90 to the Sin3A complex (Fig. 2). We used the HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin to further delineate the role of HSP90 in AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC binding to Sin3A and the AHPN- and 3-Cl-AHPC-mediated increase in Sin3A-associated HDAC activity and apoptosis. Geldanamycin pretreatment of cells resulted in inhibition of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to the Sin3A complex as well as the 3-Cl-AHPC-mediated increase in HDAC activity and apoptosis (Fig. 3A–C). Geldanamycin did not inhibit HSP90 Sin3A binding (data not shown).
In view of AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC binding to Sin3A, we examined the effect of loss of Sin3A expression on 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis to determine the role of Sin3A in this process. Sin3A expression was markedly reduced in cells using siRNA and resulted in a significant inhibition of 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis, suggesting a role for this complex in this process (Fig. 3D; Supplementary Fig. S3).
3-Cl-AHPC binds SHP, resulting in enhanced SHP-Sin3A association, which is essential for 3-Cl-AHPC binding to Sin3A complex and 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis. The orphan receptor SHP has recently been found to be a member of the Sin3A complex, and it has been speculated that SHP-mediated repression of gene expression may be through its Sin3A association (18). Because we found that [5,5′-3H2]AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC bound to a Sin3A complex but only in the presence of the nuclear extract, we speculated that [5,5′-3H2]AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC may be binding to SHP with subsequent recruitment of the Sin3A complex to the liganded receptor. We therefore assessed binding of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN to recombinant SHP. [5,5′-3H2]AHPN bound specifically and with high affinity (KD of 2.88 + 0.57 nmol/L; Fig. 4A) to recombinant SHP in a manner that was inhibited by 3-Cl-AHPC. Binding of [3H]trans-retinoic acid ([3H]tRA) to SHP was not observed (Fig. 4B). Preincubation of GST-SHP with SHP antibody totally inhibited [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to SHP (data not shown). In addition, specific [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to GST-SHP was observed when GST-SHP was incubated with [5,5′-3H2]AHPN, and then the GST-SHP was fractionated over a G25 column (Fig. 4C). [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding coeluted with GST-SHP; this binding was inhibited by excess unlabeled 3-Cl-AHPC. No binding was noted if [5,5′-3H2]AHPN was incubated with only GST (data not shown). Thus, [5,5′-3H2]AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC seem to be ligands for SHP, whereas the classic retinoid tRA is not.
The ability of several 3-Cl-AHPC analogues to inhibit [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to SHP was compared with their ability to induce apoptosis. A strong correlation of R = 0.96 (P = 0.002) was found between binding to SHP as assessed by the inhibition of [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to SHP and the induction of apoptosis (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, the 3-Cl-AHPC analogues 3-A-AHPC and BI-2002, which block AHPN- and 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis, also inhibited [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to SHP, suggesting that AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC binding to SHP plays an important role in AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis (Fig. 4D; ref. 22).
SHP and Sin3A play essential roles in 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis and inhibition of c-Myc expression. Exposure of cells to 3-Cl-AHPC resulted in the increased association of SHP as well as N-CoR, HDAC4, and HSP90 with Sin3A (Figs. 2 and 5A). The addition to cells of 3-A-AHPC, which blocks [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to SHP (Fig. 4D), also inhibited 3-Cl-AHPC–enhanced SHP association with the Sin3A complex (Fig. 5B) and blocked 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis as we have previously shown (22). We speculated that if 3-Cl-AHPC binding to SHP plays an important role in 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis, loss of SHP expression should inhibit 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis. We therefore examined 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis in MDA-MB-468 cells with loss of SHP expression as well as in SHP-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF; ref. 24). SHP expression was reduced 50% to 60% in MDA-MB-468 cells using siRNA (Supplementary Fig. S5). Knockdown of SHP in MDA-MB-468 cells and knockout of SHP in the MEF cells attenuated [5,5′-3H2]AHPN binding to Sin3A and resulted in resistance of the corresponding cells to 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis (Fig. 5C and D). However, these manipulations of SHP did not alter apoptosis induction by the proteasome inhibitor N-acetyl-l-leucinyl-l-leucinyl-norleucinal (LLnL), Adriamycin, or the inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation kamebakaurin (Fig. 5D). Although decreased, a low level of 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis was still noted in the SHP knockout MEF cells. The mechanism for 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis independent of SHP expression remains to be delineated.
Sin3A inhibits gene expression at the transcriptional level through its increased binding to specific promoters (16, 30, 31). Gene array studies in several cell types showed a rapid inhibition of c-Myc expression following 3-Cl-AHPC exposure (data not shown). Exposure of MDA-MB-468 and KG-1 cells to 3-Cl-AHPC resulted in inhibition of c-Myc protein and mRNA expression within 6 h (Fig. 6A and B). 3-Cl-AHPC inhibition of c-Myc transcription in both cell types is associated with 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated enhanced binding of Sin3A and SHP to the c-Myc promoter as shown by ChIP assay (Fig. 6C and D). That this 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated SHP/Sin3A binding to the c-Myc promoter is specific is shown by a lack of 3-Cl-AHPC–increased Sin3A binding to the actin promoter (Fig. 6C).
Discussion
The Sin3A protein serves as the scaffold to which several proteins bind with the subsequent formation of the Sin3A complex (16). Binding to Sin3A occurs through its amphipathic [paired amphipathic helix (PAH)] domains. Sin3A possesses four PAH domains (PAH1, PAH2, PAH3, and PAH4), and evidence suggests that they are not redundant but that each domain binds a unique protein(s) (30, 31); whereas PAH2 is responsible for the binding of the c-Myc family member Mad, PAH3 binds the corepressor N-CoR (30, 31). The Sin3A complex inhibits the transcription of a large number of genes through its unique binding of selective nuclear transcription factors, corepressors, as well as HDACs and methylases (30). Although Sin3A does not directly bind to DNA, it is recruited to promoter templates through its binding to other transcription factors harboring sequence-specific DNA-binding activity (32). We have found that 3-Cl-AHPC exposure resulted in enhanced binding of several proteins to the Sin3A complex that is involved in transcriptional repression as well as the nuclear orphan receptor SHP. We hypothesize that the initial event in this process is the binding of 3-Cl-AHPC or 3-Cl-AHPC to SHP. We have shown that SHP tightly binds AHPN with a KD of 2.8 nmol/L, which is similar to that noted for the binding of AHPN by nuclear extracts (14). Moreover, we found that both SHP and Sin3A play key roles in the proapoptotic activities of AHPN and 3-Cl-AHPC. Loss of Sin3A expression in MDA-MB-468 cells and SHP expression in MDA-MB-468 and MEF cells inhibits 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis. Interestingly, MEF cells display increased sensitivity to 3-Cl-AHPC-mediated apoptosis. Furthermore, 3-Cl-AHPC analogues, which inhibit 3-Cl-AHPC-mediated apoptosis, also block AHPN binding to SHP and SHP binding to the Sin3A complex. Considered together, these results strongly suggest that SHP binding by 3-Cl-AHPC and the subsequent recruitment of a Sin3A-containing complex to the ligand-bound receptor play an important role in 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis.
Interaction of SHP with a Sin3A complex has been previously documented in hepatocytes and has been shown to occur through the repression domain of the orphan receptor (18). More importantly, this association of SHP with Sin3A in these cells results in the recruitment of several proteins to the complex, association of the modified complex to the CYP7A1 gene promoter, and subsequent transcriptional repression (18).
SHP has been shown to interact with several nuclear receptors, including the thyroid hormone receptor, RAR, RXR, estrogen receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, and hepatocyte nuclear receptors FXR and LRH-1 (27). Interaction between SHP and these receptors is enhanced by the presence of their cognate ligand and results in SHP-mediated down-regulation of their respective signaling pathways (33). In addition, SHP is able to interact with Nur77 and inhibit transcriptional activation mediated by this orphan receptor (34). In contrast, SHP binding to the peroxisome-activated receptors α and γ as well as the transcriptional factor NF-κB results in their activation (35, 36). Although no ligand for SHP has been identified, recent SHP modeling studies by Macchiarulo et al. (37) suggest the presence of a phospholipid-binding site. SHP mRNA expression has been found in several tissues and cell lines. SHP protein is expressed in liver, heart, kidney, small intestine, stomach, spleen, adrenal, colon, breast adipose tissue, brain, epididymis, prostate, uterus, bladder, lung, and pancreas (20, 38–40). SHP expression is abundant in murine macrophage cell line (36) and also increases during monocytic differentiation with exposure of HL-60R leukemia cells to a 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response element (41).
In addition to SHP, 3-Cl-AHPC exposure results in the increased association of HSP90 with Sin3A. Several investigators have now shown that HSP90 is associated with and modulates the activity of a variety of steroid, hormone receptors (42). The role of HSP90 in the ability of these receptors to bind their respective ligands and activate gene transcription is controversial. Several groups have shown that the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor must be bound to HSP90 for receptor high-affinity ligand binding (43). Incubation of cells with the specific HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin blocked glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding as well as its binding to its consensus sequence in the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (44). We have found that the addition of geldanamycin to 3-Cl-AHPC–exposed cells inhibited 3-Cl-AHPC binding to the Sin3A complex as well as 3-Cl-AHPC–mediated induction of Sin3A-associated HDAC activity and apoptosis. Gene repression can be mediated through Sin3A-associated HDAC1- and HDAC2-mediated deacetylation of histones. The fact that HSP90 seems to be involved with 3-Cl-AHPC binding to Sin3A and the subsequent enhancement of Sin3A-associated HDAC activity suggests that HSP90 plays an important role in 3-Cl-AHPC-induced apoptosis. Studies to assess whether geldanamycin exposure inhibits 3-Cl-AHPC/Sin3A–mediated gene expression are under way.
AHPN and its analogues have been shown to have a wide variety of effects on malignant cells before the induction of apoptosis (45, 46). Diverse mechanisms have been proposed to more clearly define the pathway(s) through which AHPN and its analogues exert their effects. These include the induction of specific proteins, inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase-1 phosphatase resulting in c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase kinase activation, induction of DNA adducts, translocation of the nuclear transcription factor TR3 to mitochondria, and TR3 binding to Bcl-2 as well other proposed mechanisms (13, 47, 48). How AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC exerts these diverse effects in malignant cells is not clear. Although AHPN activates RARγ and 3-Cl-AHPC does not, they seem to exhibit similar mechanisms of action in all aspects we have examined. In the present study, we have shown that AHPN, 3-Cl-AHPC, and their analogues bind to SHP and holo-SHP binds subsequently to a Sin3A complex that is likely involved in transcriptional repression. Whether AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC binding to SHP and the Sin3A complex is responsible for all of the documented effects of AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC on cellular function remains to be clarified. However, our results strongly suggest that SHP and Sin3A play an important role in AHPN/3-Cl-AHPC–mediated apoptosis. Studies to determine the role of SHP, if any, in the pathways detailed above by which AHPN, 3-Cl-AHPC, and their analogues induce apoptosis are being conducted. Crystalization of the 3-Cl-AHPC/SHP complex should allow us to delineate the 3-Cl-AHPC binding pocket and design more active SHP ligands.
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
Acknowledgments
Grant support: National Cancer Institute (M.I. Dawson and J.A. Fontana) and Veterans Affairs Merit Review (J.A. Fontana and M.I. Dawson).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Dr. Robert G. Roeder (Rockefeller University, New York, NY) for providing anti-GPS2 and anti-TBL1 antibodies, Dr. Roy Frey (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) for providing purified recombinant full-length SIRT with a 6-His tag and anti-SIRT1 antibody, and Dr. Anton Krumm (University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA) for providing the c-Myc gene containing the pHEBO-c-Myc plasmid.