Abstract
Mechanisms for multifocal bladder carcinogenesis remain unclear. To see whether normal mucosa had already acquired genetic or epigenetic changes, we examined loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 10 microsatellite loci and methylation of the p16INK4 CpG island in multiple tumors and pathologically normal mucosa in six patients with bladder cancer. Either LOH or methylation was detected in 77% of samples of normal epithelium, and LOH detected in samples of normal epithelium was also observed in most tumor samples. This result indicated that a population of cells in morphologically normal epithelium possessed genetic or epigenetic aberrations in common with bladder cancer, which might provide a ground for multiple tumorigenesis.
Introduction
Transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder features metachronous or synchronous multiple tumors. Approximately 70% of patients with an initial diagnosis of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder develop recurrent disease, and invasive lesions appear in 15% of patients within a short period(1). Sidransky et al. (2) and Mao et al. (3) demonstrated that synchronous bladder cancers are of clonal origin, based on an identical pattern of X chromosome inactivation and microsatellite alteration. Clonal origin of metachronous urothelial tumors is shown by the identical mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene (4). These findings indicate that bladder cancer originates from a progression of genetic changes in a monoclonal fashion and that multiple tumors of either the synchronous or metachronous type are derived from micrometastatic foci that have migrated from the original site, rather than the occurrence of a polyclonal mutation. Recently, several lines of evidence suggest that at least some of the genetic aberrations found in invasive cancers are already present in morphologically normal epithelium. In aerodigestive cancers, multiple tumors and morphologically normal mucosa had a polyclonal p53 mutation (5). LOH2has been detected in morphologically normal lobules adjacent to breast cancers (6). These reports indicated that clonal genetic abnormalities might be detectable before any phenotypic abnormalities are evident in epithelia. If a single mutant progenitor cell clone expands to populate widespread areas of the bladder epithelia and subsequently progresses to cancer, the recurrence rate would be high after local treatment. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the patterns of several genetic and epigenetic changes in synchronous and metachronous bladder cancers and histologically normal mucosa to determine whether genetic aberrations found in invasive bladder cancers are also present in the same patient in the morphologically normal epithelium. For this purpose, we examined LOH patterns in a panel of microsatellites whose alterations are frequently seen in bladder cancer. In addition to genetic instability that causes LOH,epigenetic factors are the responsible mechanisms that drive the evolutional process of cancer (7). To determine whether epigenetic alterations occur in cancers and histologically normal mucosa, methylation of the promoter region of the p16 tumor suppressor gene, which is frequently observed in bladder cancer (8),was also examined.
Materials and Methods
Patients and Tissue Samples.
Bladder tumor and morphologically normal epithelium samples were obtained from six patients (five males and one female; mean age at the time of diagnosis, 64.7 years; age range, 54–76 years) who developed metachronous bladder tumors and were subsequently treated by total cystectomy between 1990 and 1997 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. No patients had occupational hazards for exposure to known carcinogens for bladder cancer, a history of habitual smoking, or a familial history of urothelial cancer. Twenty-three operations (15 transurethral resections/biopsies, 6 total cystectomies, and 2 excisions of metastatic sites) were performed on these patients. In two patients(cases 2 and 5), the pathology of the cystectomy specimen resulted in pT0 after TUR. The profiles of patients are described in Table 1 . Tumors were staged according to the TNM (tumor-node-metastasis)classification (9), and grades were classified according to the WHO classification (10). Progression of tumor stage or grade occurred in all patients with recurrent tumors. Nineteen tumors and 13 normal epithelium samples were obtained from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. On nine occasions(seven TUR-Bt and two cystectomies), tumor samples and normal epithelium samples were obtained during the same operation. As a control, specimens of bladder epithelium were obtained from 10 patients during surgery for nonneoplastic prostate pathology. Histological examination of these samples showed morphologically normal bladder epithelium, and urine cytology in these patients was negative. The mean age of these patients with normal bladder mucosa was 69.6 years (age range, 57–81 years).
Microdissection and DNA Extraction.
Microdissection and DNA extraction were performed as described previously (11). Briefly, serial 5-μm sections were cut from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, mounted on UV-treated acetate sheets, and deparaffinized. Sections were stained with H&E to confirm the histopathological diagnosis. A section of morphologically normal epithelium was obtained from the paraffin block that did not contain cancer tissues to avoid potential contamination of cancer cells. Microdissected samples were incubated overnight in 0.1 m Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 2 mmEDTA containing 400 μg of proteinase K at 37°C. Normal lymph nodes obtained by pelvic lymph node dissection or from ovaries without invasion (patient 6) resected at cystectomy served as a constitutive control for each patient. In the healthy control, DNA extracted from patient leukocytes was used as control DNA in the analysis.
Microsatellites.
After DNA extraction, LOH was assessed with the following polymorphic markers: (a) D3S1038 (chromosomal locus,3p26.1–25.2; size of the amplified product, 115 bp); (b)D3S1435 (chromosomal locus, 3pter-24.2; size of the amplified product,154 bp); (c) D3S1274 (chromosomal locus, 3p12; size of the amplified product, 128 bp); (d) D4S243 (chromosomal locus,4p32.3; size of the amplified product, 173 bp); (e) ANK1(chromosomal locus, 8p12–11.2; size of the amplified product, 107 bp);(f) IFNA (chromosomal locus, 9p22; size of the amplified product, 138 bp); (g) D9S118 (chromosomal locus, 9q31–34;size of the amplified product, 69 bp); (h) ABL1 (chromosomal locus, 9q34.1; size of the amplified product, 89 bp); (i)MS34 (chromosomal locus, 13q11–12.1; size of the amplified product,169 bp); and (j) D16S310 (chromosomal locus, 16q22.1; size of the amplified product, 162 bp). We selected these genomic loci because they frequently show LOH in urothelial cancer(12), and their amplified products were small enough in size to have definite PCR results. Primer sequences and the annealing temperature for PCR were retrieved from the newest update of Genome Database.3Primers labeled with FITC were synthesized commercially (Grainer Japan,Tokyo, Japan). DNA was amplified by PCR in a final reaction volume of 25 μl containing 200 μm of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 2 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mm KCl, 0.01 mmEDTA, 0.1 mm DTT, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% NP40,5% glycerol, 6 pmol of each primer, and 1 unit of Ex. Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo Co., Tokyo, Japan). PCR cycling conditions using the cold start technique on the DNA Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer,Norwalk, CT) were identical for all primers used: (a) an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; (b) 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C to 60°C for 1 min, and extension for 1 min at 72°C; and (c) a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Aliquots of PCR products (3 μl), which were diluted with an equal volume of loading dye (15% Ficoll and 10 mg/ml blue dextran), were denatured at 94°C for 10 min and electrophoresed in 8% Long Ranger (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME) gel containing 7 m urea on DNA sequencer DSQ 500S(Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) for 3–5 h at 21 W. The relative allelic dosage was quantified using densitometry with an image analysis software program (DSQ 500S; Shimadzu Corp.). LOH was scored in informative cases when a >50% reduction in the ratio of signals from tumor alleles to signals from the corresponding normal (control)alleles in the adjacent lane was observed. Analysis of all samples was carried out in a coded fashion.
Methylation Analysis of p16INK4 CpG Island.
Methylation status of the p16INK4 CpG island was assessed by MSP developed by Herman et al.(13). This assay entails an initial modification of DNA by sodium bisulfite, converting all unmethylated (but not methylated)cytosine to uracil and subsequent amplification with primers specific for methylated versus nonmethylated DNA. Briefly, DNA (1μg) in a volume of 50 μl was denatured by NaOH (final concentration, 0.2 m) for 10 min at 37°C. For samples with nanogram quantities of human DNA, 1 μg of salmon sperm DNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was added as a carrier before modification. Freshly prepared hydroquinone (30 ml of 10 mm hydroquinone; Sigma-Aldrich) and sodium bisulfite (520 μl of 3 m sodium bisulfite;Sigma) at pH 5.0 were added and mixed, and samples were incubated at 50°C for 16 h. Modified DNA was purified using the Wizard DNA purification resin according to the instructions provided by the supplier (Promega, Madison, WI) and subsequently used for MSP analysis using primer pairs p16-M and p16-U as described elsewhere(13). The PCR mixture contained 1× GC buffer I(Takara Shuzo Co.), 0.4 mm deoxynucleotide triphosphate mixture, 300 ng of sense and antisense primers, and 156 ng of bisulfite-modified DNA or 50 ng of unmodified DNA in a final volume of 50 μl. Reactions were hot-started at 95°C for 5 min before the addition of 2.5 units of LA Taq (Takara Shuzo Co.). Amplification was carried out in a thermal cycler for 35 cycles (30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 30 s at 72°C), followed by a final 4-min extension at 72°C. Each of the PCR products (20 μl) was loaded directly onto 2.5% MetaPhor Agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized directly under UV light. Methylation-specific primers produce a product of 234 bp, and a product of 151 bp is obtained by nonmethylated-specific primers(13).
Results
Table 2 shows the pattern of LOH in each sample. The ambiguous or nonreproducible results were included in the noninformative category in Table 2. Overall, LOH was seen in 20.2% (33 of 163 informative tests)in tumors and 13.3% (14 of 105 informative tests) in the normal epithelium. The lost alleles showing LOH were identical in each individual locus in the same patient. Fig. 1,a shows a typical result of LOH. In five of six cases, we detected LOH in both cancers and morphologically normal epithelium. Furthermore, 12 of 14 (86%) LOHs seen in the normal epithelium (case 1, 3pter-24.2, 8p12–11.2, and 9q31–34; case 2, 3p12; case 3,3p26.1–25.2 and 9q31–34; case 5, 3p26.1–25.2 and 9p22; case 6,9q31–34) were maintained in the corresponding tumors. Methylation of the p16INK4 CpG island was detected in 37.5% of cancer samples (6 of 16 informative tests) and in 17.6% of normal epithelium (3 of 17 tests; seen only in case 4). Fig. 1 b shows a typical result of methylation of p16INK4 CpG island.
Changes in chromosomal deletions during tumor progression were demonstrated in two cases (cases 1 and 2). In these cases, recurrent tumors showed heterogeneity in the LOH pattern compared with that of the primary cancer (case 1, 1T1, 1T2, and 1T3; case 2, 2T1 and 2T2).
In case 5, morphologically normal epithelium obtained from four different sites in the bladder was examined on LOH and showed identical results (Fig. 2). Two cases (cases 4 and 6) did not demonstrate an association of genetic aberrations between normal epithelium and cancer. In case 6,LOH detected in normal mucosa (6N1) was not seen in the tumors. Case 4 did not show LOH in both carcinomas and normal epithelium. However, in this case, methylation at the p16INK4 CpG island was detected in the recurrent tumor and morphologically normal epithelium (Fig. 1 b). In biopsies of bladder epithelium obtained from patients with nonneoplastic prostate disease, neither LOH in 97 total informative loci nor methylation at the p16INK4 CpG island was detected.
These data suggest that (a) some unique and presumably significant combinations of LOH were retained in the progression from morphologically normal epithelium to advanced cancer, which was characteristic of clonal expansion, and (b) epigenetic changes such as methylation at the p16INK4 CpG island could occur as early as in morphologically normal epithelial cells.
Discussion
Among the loci with LOHs observed in the morphologically normal bladder epithelium in this study, 3p (14) and 8p(15) have been considered late markers because they have been associated with invasive cancers. Reported cases showed that LOH in 3p is quite rare in pTa tumors (16). Late markers feature the specific chromosomal deletion for invasive cancers in the stepwise genetic changes of carcinogenesis. However, previous studies examined the genetic aberration in invasive cancers in a single time frame, and a chronological analysis from superficial cancer to invasive cancer has not been performed. We saw in this study that morphologically normal epithelium possessed LOHs at loci of late markers, and those LOHs were retained through the metachronous tumors. Thus, our preliminary data turned out to contradict the proposed pathway for stepwise chromosomal changes in the progression of bladder cancer (16). Along with the genetic changes occurring in a population of clustered normal cells, we noticed that epigenetic change, methylation of a putative tumor suppressor gene, could also take place in normal mucosa. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that epigenetic changes in a putative tumor suppresser gene were seen in normal epithelium in multiple metachronous cancers.
Schmidt and Mead (17) introduced the concept of patch size in the argument of clonal origin of tumors. A patch is regarded as a group of cells or structures that share a common genotype. Tsai et al. (18) examined the monoclonality of normal urothelium using the X chromosome inactivation analysis. They were able to demonstrate individual “patches” of monoclonal cells that covered an area as large as 120 mm2containing about 2 × 10 6 cells. This suggests that only 200–300 stem cells participated in the formation of the bladder epithelium. They speculated that each of the daughter cells that covered the large area of bladder epithelium derived from a stem cell would have the same genetic predisposition to tumorigenesis as the stem cell itself. In case 5, four samples of normal epithelium obtained from four different portions of the urinary bladder (5N3) showed the same LOHs. A possible explanation is that a single stem cell with LOH detected in normal epithelium might have a growth advantage to form a larger patch that is predisposed to cancerization (19). Apart from genotypic changes, Rao et al. (20) showed that changes in phenotypic biochemical markers, such as the expression of G-actin, in bladder cancer were already seen in the normal mucosa. On the basis of these data, we speculate that a progenitor mutant clone would exist in the morphologically normal epithelium, and it might have a growth advantage to form a larger patch, where subsequent genetic changes could transform “normal” epithelia to cancer. Metachronous cancers can occur in the patch derived from a progenitor mutant clone. However,the pattern of genetic or epigenetic aberrations may encounter heterogeneity along the pathway of evolution from the progenitor clone that disguises multiple tumors as of polyclonal origin. To further explore this issue, discovery of a proper marker gene for a stem cell of bladder epithelium is awaited.
It could be argued that LOHs or epigenetic change of the p16INK4 CpG island observed in the normal epithelium does not contribute significantly as a gatekeeper gene to the progression to cancerization. However, the following findings refute such an argument: (a) chromosomal deletions detected in this study have been reported as being relevant to the progression to invasive cancer (14, 15); (b) LOHs detected in the normal epithelium were unique for each patient and largely retained in the cancer; and (c) the p16INK4 CpG island is a putative tumor suppressor gene, and its deletion or methylation has been reported in various cancers (7). Additional studies are warranted to see whether patients with LOH or epigenetic changes in normal bladder epithelium are more likely to have a tumor recurrence than patients whose normal epithelium is not genetically aberrant.
In conclusion, in the present study, we demonstrated chromosomal deletions and methylation of the promoter regions of putative tumor suppressor gene in morphologically normal bladder epithelium from patients with bladder cancer. The existence of genetic/epigenetic changes in morphologically normal bladder mucosa might be a ground for multiple carcinogenesis.
Acknowledgments
We thank Akiko Hirose and Etsuko Tanaka for technical assistance.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are: LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MSP, methylation-specific PCR; TUR-Bt, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; TUR, transurethral resection.
Available on the World Wide Web at http://www.gdb.org/.
Case . | Sex . | Age (yrs) . | Operation . | Date (mo/yr) . | Sample . | Tumor grade . | pT . | LN . | Prognosis . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 54 | TUR-Bta | 12 /1989 | 1T1 | G2>3 | pT1 | ||
Total cystectomy | 2 /1990 | 1T2 | G3 | pT3a | (−); 0/10 | ||||
1N | NE | ||||||||
PLND | 3 /1992 | 1T3 | LN metastasis | Dead (7M) | |||||
2 | M | 76 | TUR-Bt | 7 /1990 | 2T1 | G2 | pT1 | ||
TUR-B | 1 /1991 | 2T2 | G2 | pT2a | (−); 0/18 | ||||
Total cystectomy | 2 /1991 | 2N | NE | pT0 | NED (101M) | ||||
3 | M | 60 | TUR-B | 5 /1990 | 3T1 | G3 | pT1 | ||
Total cystectomy | 5 /1990 | 3T2 | TCC>AC,G3 | pT3a | (+); 2/13 | ||||
3N | NE | ||||||||
Resection of LN metastasis | 11 /1990 | 3T3 | TCC>AC,G3 | Dead (1M) | |||||
4 | M | 63 | TUR-Bt | 1 /1995 | 4T1 | TCC>Ac,G2 | pTa | ||
TUR-B | 2 /1996 | 4N1 | NE | ||||||
TUR-B | 6 /1996 | 4N2 | Atypical | ||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 10 /1996 | 4T2 | G2-3 | pTa | |||||
4N3 | NE | ||||||||
Total cystectomy | 2 /1997 | 4T3 | G2-3 | CIS | (−); 0/4 | NED (29M) | |||
5 | M | 72 | TUR-Bt & B | 4 /1995 | 5T1 | G2 | pTa | ||
5N1 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 10 /1996 | 5T2 | G2>3 | pT1 | |||||
5N2 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt | 12 /1996 | 5T3 | G3>2 | pT1 | |||||
Total cystectomy | 1 /1997 | 5N3 | NE | pT0 | (−); 0/4 | NED (31M) | |||
6 | F | 63 | TUR-Bt & B | 4 /1995 | 6T1 | G2 | pTa | ||
6N1 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 2 /1996 | 6T2 | G1-2 | pTa | |||||
6N2 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 4 /1996 | 6T3 | G1 | pTa | |||||
6N3 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 6 /1997 | 6T4 | G2-3 | pT2a | |||||
6N4 | NE | ||||||||
Total cystectomy | 6 /1997 | 6T5 | G3>2 | pT4 | (+); 2/2 | Dead (19M) |
Case . | Sex . | Age (yrs) . | Operation . | Date (mo/yr) . | Sample . | Tumor grade . | pT . | LN . | Prognosis . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 54 | TUR-Bta | 12 /1989 | 1T1 | G2>3 | pT1 | ||
Total cystectomy | 2 /1990 | 1T2 | G3 | pT3a | (−); 0/10 | ||||
1N | NE | ||||||||
PLND | 3 /1992 | 1T3 | LN metastasis | Dead (7M) | |||||
2 | M | 76 | TUR-Bt | 7 /1990 | 2T1 | G2 | pT1 | ||
TUR-B | 1 /1991 | 2T2 | G2 | pT2a | (−); 0/18 | ||||
Total cystectomy | 2 /1991 | 2N | NE | pT0 | NED (101M) | ||||
3 | M | 60 | TUR-B | 5 /1990 | 3T1 | G3 | pT1 | ||
Total cystectomy | 5 /1990 | 3T2 | TCC>AC,G3 | pT3a | (+); 2/13 | ||||
3N | NE | ||||||||
Resection of LN metastasis | 11 /1990 | 3T3 | TCC>AC,G3 | Dead (1M) | |||||
4 | M | 63 | TUR-Bt | 1 /1995 | 4T1 | TCC>Ac,G2 | pTa | ||
TUR-B | 2 /1996 | 4N1 | NE | ||||||
TUR-B | 6 /1996 | 4N2 | Atypical | ||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 10 /1996 | 4T2 | G2-3 | pTa | |||||
4N3 | NE | ||||||||
Total cystectomy | 2 /1997 | 4T3 | G2-3 | CIS | (−); 0/4 | NED (29M) | |||
5 | M | 72 | TUR-Bt & B | 4 /1995 | 5T1 | G2 | pTa | ||
5N1 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 10 /1996 | 5T2 | G2>3 | pT1 | |||||
5N2 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt | 12 /1996 | 5T3 | G3>2 | pT1 | |||||
Total cystectomy | 1 /1997 | 5N3 | NE | pT0 | (−); 0/4 | NED (31M) | |||
6 | F | 63 | TUR-Bt & B | 4 /1995 | 6T1 | G2 | pTa | ||
6N1 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 2 /1996 | 6T2 | G1-2 | pTa | |||||
6N2 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 4 /1996 | 6T3 | G1 | pTa | |||||
6N3 | NE | ||||||||
TUR-Bt & B | 6 /1997 | 6T4 | G2-3 | pT2a | |||||
6N4 | NE | ||||||||
Total cystectomy | 6 /1997 | 6T5 | G3>2 | pT4 | (+); 2/2 | Dead (19M) |
TUR-Bt transurethral resection of bladder tumor; TUR-B, transurethral biopsy of bladder mucosa; PLND,pelvic lymph node dissection; NE, normal epithelium; TCC, transitional cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; LN, lymph node; NED, no evidence of disease.