Small GTPase Ras homologue enriched in brain (RHEB) binds and activates the key metabolic regulator mTORC1, which has an important role in cancer cells, but the role of RHEB in cancer pathogenesis has not been shown. By performing a meta-analysis of published cancer cytogenetic and transcriptome databases, we defined a gain of chromosome 7q36.1-q36.3 containing the RHEB locus, an overexpression of RHEB mRNA in several different carcinoma histotypes, and an association between RHEB upregulation and poor prognosis in breast and head and neck cancers. To model gain of function in epithelial malignancy, we targeted Rheb expression to murine basal keratinocytes of transgenic mice at levels similar to those that occur in human squamous cancer cell lines. Juvenile transgenic epidermis displayed constitutive mTORC1 pathway activation, elevated cyclin D1 protein, and diffuse skin hyperplasia. Skin tumors subsequently developed with concomitant stromal angio-inflammatory foci, evidencing induction of an epidermal hypoxia-inducible factor-1 transcriptional program, and paracrine feed-forward activation of the interleukin-6–signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway. Rheb-induced tumor persistence and neoplastic molecular alterations were mTORC1 dependent. Rheb markedly sensitized transgenic epidermis to squamous carcinoma induction following a single dose of Ras-activating carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene. Our findings offer direct evidence that RHEB facilitates multistage carcinogenesis through induction of multiple oncogenic mechanisms, perhaps contributing to the poor prognosis of patients with cancers overexpressing RHEB. Cancer Res; 70(8); 3287–98. ©2010 AACR.

The pathway integrating diverse mammalian cell growth signals engages the heterotrimeric protein kinase mTORC1, which, when induced, stimulates growth by promoting ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis through effectors p70S6K and eIF-4E-BP (13). Growth pathways converge on the negative regulator of mTORC1, tuberous sclerosis complex 1/2 (TSC1/2). As a GTPase-activating protein toward the small G protein Ras homologue enriched in brain (RHEB), TSC1/2 inhibits RHEB function. GTP-bound RHEB is a direct mTORC1 activator, which is essential for cell growth in Drosophila and mammalian cells (35). Growth factor receptor activation triggers the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT cascade stimulating mTORC1 by repressing TSC1/2, whereas a sufficiency of cellular energy (i.e., high ATP/ADP ratio) suppresses LKB1 and AMP-activated protein kinase signaling, which inhibits mTORC1 by activating TSC1/2. Both growth factor, bioenergetic, and nutrient pathways also regulate mTORC1 through TSC1/2-independent mechanisms (68).

mTORC1 hyperactivation occurs in most human cancers via PI3K/AKT signaling, which is induced by either mutation or amplification of genes encoding growth factor receptors, the PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA), or AKT, or loss of function of pathway negative regulators including the tumor suppressors NF1, PTEN, and TSC1/2 (35). Dysregulated mTORC1 signaling is present in the tumor-prone Peutz-Jeghers syndrome due to LKB1 inactivating mutations and in human colorectal cancers with APC loss of function (ref. 9 and references therein). Many preclinical studies show that mTORC1 blockade by rapamycin and its derivatives is antineoplastic in lesions induced by a variety of oncogenic signaling inputs, suggesting that mTORC1 is a relevant common effector of cancer development (914).

RHEB cytogenetic and expression data are limited in human cancers. Unlike other mTORC1 upstream genes, RHEB or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) mutations have not been discovered (15, 16). RHEB is located on chromosome 7q36. A recent study showed low-frequency whole chromosome 7 amplification in a cohort of comparative genomic hybridization–analyzed human prostate cancers (17); however, RHEB locus amplification or association between RHEB expression and human cancer prognosis has not been investigated. Recently, two animal studies showed that Rheb gain of function was tumorigenic. Rheb overexpression enhanced Eμ-Myc–mediated lymphomagenesis in a mouse bone marrow transplantation model (18) and produced low-grade prostatic intraepithelial hyperplasia (17). However, the lymphoma model did not test Rheb tumorigenicity as a monogenetic perturbation, and the nature of a secondary cooperating hit responsible for the long latency and low penetrance of Rheb-mediated prostatic hyperproliferation was not elucidated. Thus, despite progress, important questions remain about RHEB expression and function in tumorigenesis.

Here, we show RHEB overexpression and chromosomal locus amplification in a broad spectrum of human cancers and prognostic association in breast and head and neck squamous cancer. Using a transgenic mouse model of Rheb overexpression and mTORC1 hyperactivation in skin epidermis recapitulating RHEB expression in human cancer cells, we show that Rheb gain of function facilitates cancer progression through multiple mechanisms.

Cancer transcriptome database mining

We queried Oncomine and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), listing all data sets containing RHEB expression data, and downloaded those trending toward differential expression between cancers and normal tissues or between cancer types/grades. Unpaired two-tailed t tests determined statistical significance associated with differential expression (P < 0.05). This analysis identified the Oncomine Chen_Liver cancer (normal versus cancer), Blaveri_Bladder_2 cancer (low grade versus high grade), Chung_Head and neck cancer (normal versus cancer), and GEO GDS1650 lung adenocarcinoma (normal versus cancer) data sets. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine high RHEB–expressing outliers in stage III versus stage I breast cancers from the Oncomine vantVeer_Breast cancer cohort. A second breast cancer data set, Oncomine Minn_Breast_2 cancer, was analyzed as validation for the vantVeer_Breast cancer set. The two breast and one head and neck cancer cohorts were further analyzed for correlation between cancer RHEB expression and clinical outcome. Specifically, each of the three cancer data sets was divided into quartiles based on RHEB mRNA levels, and a survival curves for the upper 25th [RHEB-high (RHEB-Hi)] versus the lower 25th quartiles were compared for the statistical significance using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

Mouse experiments

Myc-mouse Rheb cDNA was cloned into a 2-kb fragment of human K14 promoter (19). The transgene was used for pronuclear microinjection of FVB/n embryos. A total of eight transgenic founders were generated, and two transmitted the transgene through the germline. In the chemoprevention trial, 8-wk-old transgenic mice were treated with 10 μg/g of RAD001 or vehicle (Novartis Corp.) by gavage once per week for 13 to 15 wk. In the therapeutic trial, tumor-bearing mice between 15 and 25 wk were treated with 7.5 μg/g RAD001 or vehicle thrice per week for 4 wk. For skin carcinogenesis, the back skin of 8-wk-old mice was shaved and topically treated with a single dose of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA; Sigma-Aldrich), 100 μg in acetone. The Animal Studies Committee of Washington University in St. Louis approved all animal work.

Histology, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry

Tissues were obtained from 10% sucrose/10% formalin–perfused mice, and microwave-processed (20), or immersed in zinc fixative (BD Biosciences) for 24 h. Tissue sections were stained with H&E (20). For immunofluorescence, rehydrated sections were blocked with Dako Protein Block (Dako North America). Antigen retrieval was performed in citrate- or EDTA-based buffer using a pressure cooker (Biocare Medical). Primary and fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies were diluted in Dako antibody diluent. For immunohistochemical detection, sections were incubated with biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies followed by immunoperoxidase staining using Vectastain ABC Elite kit (Vector Laboratories) and diaminobenzidine (Dako North America). Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) mouse pulse labeling and tissue immunostaining were performed as previously described (21). The following antibodies used in immunostaining were from Cell Signaling Technology: rabbit antibodies against phospho-S6 ribosomal proteinS235/236 (1:500), phospho-eIF-4GS1108 (1:100), phospho-RBS780 (1:100), Rheb (1:400), Myc tag (1:500), activated caspase-3 (1:500), phospho-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3Y705 (STAT3Y705; 1:50), survivin (1:100), phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2T202/Y204 (ERK1/2T202/Y204; 1:100), and E-cadherin (1:200). Additional antibodies used were rabbit anti-loricrin, anti–keratin 8 (K8), and anti–keratin 10 (1:500, 1:5,000, and 1:50, respectively; Covance); anti–cyclin D1 (1:100; Abcam); rat anti-CD45, anti–Meca 32, anti-CD4, anti-CD8a, and anti–Gr-1 (1:50, 1:20, 1:20, 1:20, and 1:20, respectively; BD Biosciences); anti-FoxP3 (1:200, eBioscience); anti-F4/80 (Serotec) antibodies; and biotinylated mouse antibody against keratin 14 (K14; 1:1,000; Lab Vision). For immunofluorescence, slides were incubated with corresponding fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:400; Molecular Probes). BrdUrd labeling was detected with Alexa Fluor 594–congujgated anti-BrdUrd antibody (Invitrogen).

Keratinocyte culture

Primary mouse keratinocytes were established from 1-d-old neonatal epidermis as described previously (21). For serum starvation, keratinocytes were cultured overnight in serum-free medium. For murine interleukin (IL)-6 stimulation, serum-starved keratinocytes were treated with 10 ng/mL recombinant murine IL-6 (eBioscience) for various durations of time.

Immunoblotting

Frozen tissues and pelleted cultured keratinocytes were lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer [1% Triton X-100, 40 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.5), 120 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 10 mmol/L pyrophosphate, 10 mmol/L glycerophosphate, 50 mmol/L NaF, 0.5 mmol/L orthovanadate, and 1:50 diluted protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich)]. Protein sample preparation and immunoblotting were according to a standard procedure (Cell Signaling Technology). The following antibodies were used in Western blotting (all at 1:1,000 and all from Cell Signaling Technology): anti-mTOR, anti–phospho-mTORS2448, anti-S6K1, anti–phospho-S6K1T389, anti–S6 ribosomal protein, anti–phospho-S6 ribosomal proteinS235/236, anti–eIF-4G, anti–phospho-eIF-4GS1108, anti-AKT, anti–phospho-AKTT308, anti–phospho-AKTS473, anti–Janus-activated kinase 2 (JAK2), anti–phospho-JAK2Y1007/1008, anti-STAT3, anti–phospho-STAT3Y705, anti–phospho-STAT3S727, anti-RB, anti–phospho-RBS780, anti–Myc tag, anti-Rheb, anti–Bcl-xl, anti–eIF-4E, and anti–cyclin D1. We also used anti–β-tubulin (1:35,000; Abcam), anti-K14 (1:2,000; Covance), anti–hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α; 1:1,000; Bethyl Laboratories), anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti–IL-6 (1:400; Abcam), and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated IgG secondary antibodies (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and ELISA

Total RNA was prepared from mouse back skin using Trizol (Invitrogen). mRNA expression was measured by real-time quantitative PCR using a Taqman Gold PCR kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). Cytokines in keratinocyte cell culture medium supernatants and/or skin lysates were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences).

Tissue microarray analysis

Cancer specimens were collected in the Department of General Surgery and Pathology, Hongqi Hospital, Mudanjiang Medical College. Specimens included (a) stage I or II breast cancer [n = 74; 12 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 62 cases of invasive ductal cancer; normal breast tissue cores from 13 reduction mammoplasty patients from University of California at San Diego Medical Center were included to the tissue microarray (TMA)], (b) Duke's stage B colorectal cancer (n = 48; 31 also with normal colon from the same patient), and (c) stage T2N0M0 or T3N0M0 gastric cancer (n = 24; 16 also with adjacent normal stomach epithelium) assessed according to the International Union Against Cancer criteria (22). The research was approved by an institutional review board of the Mudanjiang Medical College and University of California at San Diego. TMAs were previously described (23). Typically, two to three cancer cores and one adjacent normal tissue core were obtained from each specimen. Tissue core procurement details are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods. TMA immunohistochemical analysis was performed as previously described (23). Rheb antibody (AB-2; Calbiochem) or nonimmune rabbit serum was applied at a 1:2,000 dilution (v/v), and a qualitative immunostaining scoring system (immunoscore) was used for RHEB expression quantification (24).

Reverse-phase protein array

RHEB protein expression in a collection of human cancer cell lines was surveyed using high-throughput reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) as previously described (25). Briefly, the conditions of RHEB antibody (AB-2) usage were optimized for RHEB specificity by immunoblotting. Cell lysates prepared for immunoblotting were transferred to SDS sample buffer, incubated for 5 min at 95°C, and printed onto nitrocellulose-coated glass slides with an automated robotic GeneTac arrayer (Genomic Solutions, Inc.). The same stringent conditions for slide blocking, blotting, and antibody incubation, which were used for immunoblotting, were applied.

Statistical methods

Data were presented as the mean ± SD, and statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed unpaired Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or χ2 test (GraphPad Prism) and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis.

RHEB dysregulation was a novel prognostic factor in human cancer

Interrogation of published human cancer cytogenetic data revealed frequent gain/amplification of a minimally overlapping chromosomal 7q36.1-q36.3 region harboring the RHEB locus in diverse human cancer histotypes (Supplementary Table S1). Of 491 total cancer genomes, 45 (9.2%) contained gain of 7q32-qter or a smaller region. Among these genomes, 16 harbored gain of the 7q36 region. Analysis of cancer transcriptome databases (26, 27) uncovered increased RHEB expression in liver, lung, and bladder cancers (Supplementary Fig. S1A). Differential RHEB protein elevation was evident in TMAs of stomach and colorectal adenocarcinomas compared with respective adjacent histologically normal mucosa (Supplementary Fig. S1B). A striking incremental RHEB induction during breast carcinogenesis with moderate overexpression in DCIS, followed by marked malignant epithelial protein expression in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), was detected in a multistage breast TMA (Fig. 1A). Microarray database mining confirmed a statistically significant association between high-level RHEB mRNA upregulation and breast cancer progression, most evident in stage III disease and more frequent in the aggressive estrogen receptor–negative (ER) and/or progesterone receptor–negative (PR) cases (Fig. 1B; ref. 28). Quartile analysis of stage III cancers revealed that RHEB-Hi expression exhibited a worse metastasis-free survival compared with RHEB-low (RHEB-Lo) stage III counterparts (Fig. 1B). Elevated RHEB expression in a second breast cancer cohort was independent of PTEN or HER2 expression and was also significantly associated with either ER or PR negativity and an increased frequency of metastasis (Supplementary Fig. S1C; data not shown). RHEB mRNA overexpression was also detected in head and neck cancer originating in several different sites of the oropharyngeal squamous mucosa (Fig. 1C; ref. 29). Quartile analysis revealed that the RHEB-Hi group possessed a trend for reduced recurrence-free survival versus the RHEB-Lo group (Fig. 1C, middle). These data were independent of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (data not shown). Among head and neck cancer site-specific subtypes, RHEB-Hi oropharyngeal carcinomas had a worse disease outcome than RHEB-Lo counterparts (P = 0.029; Fig. 1C, right). Collectively, these data, for the first time, suggested a functional linkage between RHEB overexpression and progression of human cancers originating from several different organ sites in general and squamous cancers in particular.

Next, we surveyed RHEB expression in a collection of human cancer cell lines using high-throughput RPPA (25). RHEB high-expressing subsets were identified among mammary [highest level compared with lowest level (Hi/Lo) = 7.7], lung (Hi/Lo = 4.7), ovarian (Hi/Lo = 6.1), and head and neck cell lines (Hi/Lo = 4.4; Supplementary Fig. S2A). Analysis of human and mouse cancer cell lines by immunoblotting revealed that human SiHa and C33A and mouse C5N squamous carcinomas exhibited the highest RHEB abundance, about 3.1- to 4.7-fold elevated compared with RHEB levels in wild-type (WT) mouse skin epidermis (Supplementary Fig. S2B).

RHEB induced mTORC1 hyperactivation in transgenic epidermis and cultured keratinocytes resistant to serum and amino acid starvation

To develop a general model for studying RHEB overexpression in epithelial carcinogenesis, and a model of squamous carcinogenesis in particular, two independent transgenic mouse lines (K14-Rheb#8 and K14-Rheb#4) were created targeting murine Rheb overexpression to basal epidermal keratinocytes. Epidermal RHEB expression was elevated 4-fold in K14-Rheb#8 mice compared with WT littermate controls, matching expression in SiHa and C33A cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S2B, RHEB versus WT). K14-Rheb#8 mice displayed phenotypes at full penetrance and were used for all studies in this report. K14-Rheb#4 mice expressed the Rheb transgene at endogenous levels (data not shown), and 10% developed skin pathology identical to line K14-Rheb#8 counterparts.

Immunoblotting revealed mTORC1 target activation (phospho-p70S6K1T389 and phospho-eIF-4GS1108) and elevated p70S6K1, S6, and eIF-4G expression in transgenic epidermal extracts compared with WT controls (Supplementary Fig. S3A). The Myc-RHEB fusion protein, phospho-S6S235/236, and phospho-eIF-4GS1108 were markedly upregulated in the epidermal basal, suprabasal, and granular layers (Fig. 2A, Myc tag and RHEB), suggesting RHEB persistence accompanying epidermal differentiation. Neither phospho-AKTS473 (mTORC2 kinase site) nor phospho-AKTT308 levels (PDK1 kinase site) were differentially altered in transgenic epidermis (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Serum-starved keratinocyte cultures derived from neonatal transgenic epidermis revealed persistently elevated mTORC1 signaling (Supplementary Fig. S3B) but similar mTORC2 activity compared with WT keratinocytes (Supplementary Fig. S3C). These data suggested lack of S6K-mediated negative feedback in this model (30). mTORC1 activity was resistant to combined serum and amino acid starvation in transgenic keratinocytes but completely repressed in controls (Supplementary Fig. S3D).

Juvenile epidermal hyperplasia and universal adult-onset neoplasia in K14-Rheb transgenic mice

Neonatal transgenic mice exhibited wrinkled back skin, reddened tails and paws, and thickened ears (Supplementary Fig. S4A and B). Histologic analysis of 3-week-old transgenic back skins revealed diffuse epidermal hyperplasia (Supplementary Fig. S4C) and marked keratinocyte hypertrophy in all epidermal layers (Fig. 2B). Spontaneous neoplasia first appeared in transgenic mice at 12 weeks of age, predominantly located on the posterior neck and between the shoulder blades, and reached 100% penetrance by 32 weeks of age (n = 42; Supplementary Fig. S4D). Tumor burden ranged from 1 to 20 (7.8 ± 5.3) per mouse. In contrast, none of the WT littermates (n = 36) evidenced skin pathology. All transgenic tumors were benign, composed of hyperplastic hair follicles and hypertrophic sebaceous glands (Fig. 2C). BrdUrd incorporation was elevated in the basal and immediate suprabasal layers of hyperplasias and neoplasias (Fig. 2D), and both pathologies retained cytokeratin 10 and loricrin expression (Fig. 2D, K10 and Lor). Thus, monogenetic Rheb overexpression, although tumorigenic, did not dysregulate epithelial differentiation.

Formation or maintenance of Rheb-mediated epidermal neoplasia was mTORC1 dependent

To determine whether mTORC1 activity was required for Rheb-induced papilloma formation, 8- to 10-week-old transgenic mice were treated with the mTORC1 inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus), an orally bioavailable derivative of rapamycin, for 13 to 15 weeks. RAD001 completely prevented tumor formation, in contrast to an 88% incidence of neoplasia in vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 3A). Specific inactivation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 in back skin of RAD001-treated transgenic mice was confirmed by phospho-S6S235/236 (mTORC1 marker) and phospho-AKTS473 (canonical direct mTORC2 site) immunofluorescence, respectively (data not shown). Next, we tested whether established transgenic papillomas could be reversed by RAD001. RAD001 treatment for 20 hours inactivated mTORC1-mediated S6 phosphorylation in tumor basal and suprabasal cells, markedly decreased proliferation (BrdUrd), and induced apoptosis (activated caspase-3; Fig. 3B). Four weeks of inhibitor treatment produced a drastic visual (Fig. 3C, top, RAD001) and histologic (Fig. 3D, RAD001, 4wk) resolution of all papillomas in six transgenic mice. The other six transgenic mice, which exhibited papilloma-associated ulceration, almost completely resolved both wounding and neoplastic pathologies after RAD001 treatment (Fig. 3C, bottom, RAD001). In contrast, papilloma number and size increased in vehicle-treated mice. Abrogation of ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation consequent to 4-week RAD001 treatment was consistent with potent mTORC1 inhibition in papilloma-bearing transgenic mice (Fig. 3D, bottom; data not shown).

Rheb triggered an mTORC1-mediated angio-inflammatory switch in transgenic papillomas

As histologic analysis revealed markedly increased stromal cellularity in transgenic papillomas, we determined their inflammatory cell repertoire and vasculature. Tumor stroma contained near-confluent CD45+ cells and greatly increased blood vessel density and frequency (Fig. 4A). The stromal CD45+ cell population was composed of Gr-1+ neutrophils, F4/80+ macrophages, as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. S5). CD4 and CD8 cells additionally infiltrated the neoplastic epidermis (Supplementary Fig. S5). Four-week RAD001 papilloma treatment greatly reduced blood microvessel density and Gr-1+ and F4/80+ cells and partially diminished CD4+ and CD8+ stromal infiltration (Fig. 4A; Supplementary Fig. S5). Thus, epidermalRheb dysregulation triggered an mTORC1-dependent “angio-inflammatory switch” in association with neoplastic progression.

We screened lysates from transgenic hyperplastic and neoplastic skin for expression of candidate factors potentially responsible for the angio-inflammatory switch. IL-1α, IL-1β mRNA levels, and mRNA and protein abundance for VEGF, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-17, CXCL1, CXCL2, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) were increased in hyperplasia, markedly elevated in neoplasia, but greatly reduced by RAD001 (Fig. 4B and C; TGF-β and COX2 protein data not shown). Consistent with the RAD001-responsive HIF-1 mRNA signature detected in neoplasia (Fig. 4B), HIF-1α and VEGF levels were differentially increased in transgenic hyperplastic epidermis as early as 3 weeks of age (Fig. 4D), suggesting mTORC1-mediated HIF-1α stabilization (31). We next determined transgenic keratinocyte paracrine factor expression potentially underlying stromal activation. IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL1, and CXCL2 were differentially elevated in a rapamycin-sensitive fashion in transgenic keratinocyte-conditioned medium (Fig. 4D).

mTORC1-dependent STAT3 activation coincident with induction of the angio-inflammatory switch in transgenic epidermis

We interrogated activation and consequent downstream target gene induction of the transcription factor STAT3 in Rheb-mediated tumorigenesis, as it was a known direct target of both mTORC1 (32) and inflammatory cytokines, and its dysregulation was required for multistage skin carcinogenesis. There was a marked elevated frequency of cells positive for nuclear phospho-STAT3Y705 and increased expression of the STAT3 transcriptional targets cyclin D1 and survivin in transgenic papillomas (Fig. 5A).

To determine a causal role for STAT3 in Rheb-mediated tumorigenesis, precursor skin hyperplasias were analyzed for STAT3 and stromal inflammatory cell expression patterns (Fig. 5B; Supplementary Fig. S6A). Precursor skin hyperplasias seemed to be the site of nascent papillomas, as their epidermis was thicker and the lesions had an undulating appearance suggesting exophytic growth initiation (Fig. 5B and C). Strikingly, phospho-STAT3Y705 was focally detectable in the epidermis concurrent with subjacent stromal inflammatory cell accumulations in these lesions (Fig. 5B; Supplementary Fig. S6A, yellow arrows). Immunoblotting confirmed that pJAK2Y1007/1008, phospho-STAT3Y705, and phospho-STAT3S727 levels were differentially elevated (Supplementary Fig. S6B), and clustered cyclin D1–positive epithelial cells were present in these nascent neoplastic foci, in contrast to their low frequency in diffuse hyperplasia (Fig. 5C, cyclin D1, bottom versus top). Collectively, these data support a role for progressive STAT3 activation and consequent incremental cyclin D1 dysregulation in the hyperplasia to neoplasia transition.

Next, we determined that phospho-STAT3Y705 was not activated in keratinocytes cultured in serum-free medium (Fig. 5D) despite the low-level upregulation of a repertoire of cytokines and chemokines (Fig. 4D). In contrast, addition of the STAT3 activator IL-6 to the culture at a papilloma-associated concentration, 10 ng/mL, markedly activated phospho-STAT3Y705 and phospho-STAT3S727 in both transgenic and WT keratinocytes. Rapamycin pretreatment did not blunt phosphorylation of either STAT3 site induced by exogenous IL-6 (Fig. 5D). Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that the paracrine signaling from the angio-inflammatory switch was necessary in order for IL-6 to attain a level sufficient to breach the epithelial STAT3 activation threshold.

We next tested the specificity of mTORC1-STAT3 regulation in Rheb neoplasia. Diminution in STAT3 activation occurred as early as 20 hours after RAD001 treatment with coordinate reduction of cyclin D1 and survivin protein (Fig. 5A, RAD001, 20 hours). Four weeks of RAD001 reduced neoplastic epithelial phospho-STAT3Y705 to near WT levels (Fig. 5A, RAD001, 4 weeks). In contrast, a 6-week trial of the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib had no effect on STAT3 activation or papilloma histology (data not shown). Moreover, 4-week celecoxib, a COX2 inhibitor, therapy also failed to affect papilloma persistence (data not shown). Collectively, these data conclusively show that STAT3 activation in transgenic neoplasia was mTORC1 dependent and subject to feed-forward stromal-epithelial inflammatory amplification (Supplementary Fig. S7).

Rheb cooperation with DMBA in epidermal squamous carcinogenesis

To test whether Rheb gain of function could serve as a cooperative event in carcinogenesis, a single topical application of the tobacco carcinogen DMBA was administered to 8-week-old WT and preneoplastic transgenic mice. Rheb-DMBA papillomas developed in both cephalic and caudal back skin (Fig. 6A; Rheb-DMBA papilloma). A total of 9 of 11 transgenic mice between 17 and 30 weeks after DMBA application developed invasive squamous cell carcinomas (Fig. 6B and C). In contrast, six DMBA-treated WT mice, although universally developing sebaceous gland adenomas, did not evidence either papillomas or squamous carcinomas (data not shown). Elevated nuclear phospho-ERK1/2T202/Y204 immunoreactivity was uniformly detectable in basal cells of premalignant Rheb-DMBA papillomas (Fig. 6D, top middle), in contrast to its sporadic incidence in terminally differentiated suprabasal cells in vehicle-treated transgenic papillomas (Fig. 6D, top left). There was a further marked increase in nuclear phospho-ERK1/2T202/Y204 levels in nests of squamous carcinoma cells at the invasive front of Rheb-DMBA malignancies (Fig. 6D, top right). Although E-cadherin was expressed in all Rheb papillomas, its expression was markedly reduced or absent in the invasive nests of Rheb-DMBA carcinomas (Fig. 6D, bottom middle versus bottom left). Malignant invasive cells also expressed the primitive K8 marker of poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma (Fig. 6D, bottom right).

Here, we provide evidence for RHEB locus gain/amplification in diverse human cancers and association of RHEB overexpression with poor disease outcome. Transgenic mice overexpressing Rheb in basal epidermal keratinocytes develop multistage epithelial tumorigenesis, with rapalog-sensitive neoplasias. Systemic RAD001 efficiently inhibited mTORC1 signaling in cultured keratinocytes and neoplasias arising in transgenic mice with lack of mTORC2 negative feedback (30). Rheb gain of function produced mTORC1-mediated overexpression of a collection of growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines triggering a focal stromal angio-inflammatory switch in hyperplasia that was dispersed throughout the stroma in neoplasia. We provided several lines of evidence supporting a pathway wherein mTORC1 induced HIF-1α and HIF-1 downstream angiogenic factors along with cell-autonomous production of cytokines and chemokines.

These factors produced a focal angio-inflammatory switch that in turn elevated the levels of cytokines such as IL-6 to a level sufficient to activate epidermal STAT3 and trigger a feed-forward paracrine stromal-epithelial cross talk culminating in neoplasia (Supplementary Fig. S7). Collectively, these data suggested that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the selective advantages of RHEB locus amplification in human cancers, including adaptive growth in a suboptimal tumor microenvironment, enhanced tumor nutrient/oxygen perfusion through angiogenesis, stimulation of tumor cell growth through paracrine regulation, and increased sensitivity to carcinogens, such as tobacco.

Chronic inflammation is a risk factor for various forms of human cancer, including breast and head and neck cancers (33, 34). Prolonged nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug usage (aspirin or COX2 inhibitors) reduces the incidence of several different types of neoplasia (31, 33). Here, RHEB/mTORC1 hyperactivation in cultured keratinocytes and intact skin upregulated HIF-1α, VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL1, CXCL2, and COX2 mRNA and protein expression. Aggregate induction of these direct and indirect downstream targets was a likely mechanism for initiation and maintenance of the mTORC1-mediated angio-inflammatory switch. Our result thus extended a previous study showing an mTORC1/HIF-1/VEGF signaling cascade in prostate tumor cells (10), and our recent report on HIF-1 upregulation of TNF-α, CXCL1, and CXCL2 mRNA and protein levels in mouse epidermis (21).

A striking finding in the K14-Rheb transgenic model was that coordinate IL-6 upregulation and STAT3 activation were solely detectable in hyperplasia and neoplasia but absent in cultured keratinocytes, which required exogenous IL-6 to recapitulate in vivo signaling. These experiments showed the necessity of in vivo epithelial-stromal juxtaposition for epithelial RHEB/mTORC1-mediated feed-forward stromal cross talk culminating in tumorigenesis. Consistent with this notion, nascent transgenic papillomatosis was tightly associated with nuclear phospho-STAT3Y705 activation in squamous basal cells overlying focal inflammatory cell accumulations. Exquisite sensitivity of epidermal STAT3 activity to short-term RAD001 treatment was evidence for potent and rapid stromal inhibition by mTORC1 blockade. Two recent reports showed a requirement for stromal-epithelial IL-6 and STAT3 activation axis in carcinogenesis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (35, 36). Moreover, both loss- and gain-of-function mouse models of epidermal STAT3 signaling highlighted a requirement for STAT3 activation in epidermal carcinogenesis (37, 38).

RHEB overexpression in breast and head and neck cancers was a risk factor for cancer progression independent of HER2 amplification or PTEN loss of function in breast cancer or EGFR amplification/overexpression in head and neck cancer. RHEB overexpression could also underlie PI3K/AKT-independent mTORC1 activation in human cancers, previously identified in a subgroup from a large head and neck cancer cohort (39). Carcinogen exposure via smoking is a known risk factor for head and neck cancer (40); however, cooperation between RHEB and smoke carcinogens has not been reported. Here, Rheb potently sensitized transgenic mice to a single dose of the DMBA producing multistage squamous carcinogenesis accompanied by coordinate induction of ERK1/2. These data suggest that these two signaling modules may collaborate in human carcinogenesis. Collectively, the combination of the transgenic, DMBA carcinogen, TMA, and in silico transcriptome data strongly supports a functional contribution of RHEB gene to human carcinogenesis, particularly in malignancies in relation to environmental carcinogens, such as tobacco-associated carcinogens. Our K14-Rheb transgenic mice can be a platform for further dissection of the contribution of mTORC1 to head and neck and breast carcinogenesis.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

We thank Robert Abraham for initial discussions, Heidi Lane for the gift of RAD001 from Novartis, and Rebecca Sohn for animal husbandry.

Grant Support: National Cancer Institute grant R01-101012 (J.M. Arbeit and G.G. Chiang) and Beatrice Roe Urologic Cancer Fund (J.M. Arbeit).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Lee
CH
,
Inoki
K
,
Guan
KL
. 
mTOR pathway as a target in tissue hypertrophy
.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol
2007
;
47
:
443
67
.
2
Hay
N
,
Sonenberg
N
. 
Upstream and downstream of mTOR
.
Genes Dev
2004
;
18
:
1926
45
.
3
Guertin
DA
,
Sabatini
DM
. 
Defining the role of mTOR in cancer
.
Cancer Cell
2007
;
12
:
9
22
.
4
Shaw
RJ
,
Cantley
LC
. 
Ras, PI(3)K and mTOR signalling controls tumour cell growth
.
Nature
2006
;
441
:
424
30
.
5
Thomas
GV
. 
mTOR and cancer: reason for dancing at the crossroads?
Curr Opin Genet Dev
2006
;
16
:
78
84
.
6
Sancak
Y
,
Thoreen
CC
,
Peterson
TR
, et al
. 
PRAS40 is an insulin-regulated inhibitor of the mTORC1 protein kinase
.
Mol Cell
2007
;
25
:
903
15
.
7
Vander Haar
E
,
Lee
SI
,
Bandhakavi
S
,
Griffin
TJ
,
Kim
DH
. 
Insulin signalling to mTOR mediated by the Akt/PKB substrate PRAS40
.
Nat Cell Biol
2007
;
9
:
316
23
.
8
Gwinn
DM
,
Shackelford
DB
,
Egan
DF
, et al
. 
AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint
.
Mol Cell
2008
;
30
:
214
26
.
9
Fujishita
T
,
Aoki
K
,
Lane
HA
,
Aoki
M
,
Taketo
MM
. 
Inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway suppresses intestinal polyp formation and reduces mortality in ApcΔ716 mice
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2008
;
105
:
13544
9
.
10
Majumder
PK
,
Febbo
PG
,
Bikoff
R
, et al
. 
mTOR inhibition reverses Akt-dependent prostate intraepithelial neoplasia through regulation of apoptotic and HIF-1-dependent pathways
.
Nat Med
2004
;
10
:
594
601
.
11
Johannessen
CM
,
Johnson
BW
,
Williams
SM
, et al
. 
TORC1 is essential for NF1-associated malignancies
.
Curr Biol
2008
;
18
:
56
62
.
12
Wei
C
,
Amos
CI
,
Zhang
N
, et al
. 
Suppression of Peutz-Jeghers polyposis by targeting mammalian target of rapamycin signaling
.
Clin Cancer Res
2008
;
14
:
1167
71
.
13
Podsypanina
K
,
Lee
RT
,
Politis
C
, et al
. 
An inhibitor of mTOR reduces neoplasia and normalizes p70/S6 kinase activity in Pten+/− mice
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2001
;
98
:
10320
5
.
14
Neshat
MS
,
Mellinghoff
IK
,
Tran
C
, et al
. 
Enhanced sensitivity of PTEN-deficient tumors to inhibition of FRAP/mTOR
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2001
;
98
:
10314
9
.
15
Robb
VA
,
Karbowniczek
M
,
Klein-Szanto
AJ
,
Henske
EP
. 
Activation of the mTOR signaling pathway in renal clear cell carcinoma
.
J Urol
2007
;
177
:
346
52
.
16
The Cancer Genome Project. Hinxton (Cambridge, UK): Wellcome Trust Genome Campus [cited 2009 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/.
17
Nardella
C
,
Chen
Z
,
Salmena
L
, et al
. 
Aberrant Rheb-mediated mTORC1 activation and Pten haploinsufficiency are cooperative oncogenic events
.
Genes Dev
2008
;
22
:
2172
7
.
18
Mavrakis
KJ
,
Zhu
H
,
Silva
RL
, et al
. 
Tumorigenic activity and therapeutic inhibition of Rheb GTPase
.
Genes Dev
2008
;
22
:
2178
88
.
19
Elson
DA
,
Thurston
G
,
Huang
LE
, et al
. 
Induction of hypervascularity without leakage or inflammation in transgenic mice overexpressing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α
.
Genes Dev
2001
;
15
:
2520
32
.
20
Lu
ZH
,
Wright
JD
,
Belt
B
,
Cardiff
RD
,
Arbeit
JM
. 
Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 facilitates cervical cancer progression in human papillomavirus type 16 transgenic mice
.
Am J Pathol
2007
;
171
:
667
81
.
21
Scortegagna
M
,
Cataisson
C
,
Martin
RJ
, et al
. 
HIF-1α regulates epithelial inflammation by cell autonomous NFκB activation and paracrine stromal remodeling
.
Blood
2008
;
111
:
3343
54
.
22
Sobin
LH
,
Fleming
ID
. 
TNM classification of malignant tumors, fifth edition (1997). Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer
.
Cancer
1997
;
80
:
1803
4
.
23
Krajewska
M
,
Zapata
JM
,
Meinhold-Heerlein
I
, et al
. 
Expression of Bcl-2 family member Bid in normal and malignant tissues
.
Neoplasia
2002
;
4
:
129
40
.
24
Krajewska
M
,
Smith
LH
,
Rong
J
, et al
. 
Image analysis algorithms for immunohistochemical assessment of cell death events and fibrosis in tissue sections
.
J Histochem Cytochem
2009
;
57
:
649
63
.
25
Tibes
R
,
Qiu
Y
,
Lu
Y
, et al
. 
Reverse phase protein array: validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells
.
Mol Cancer Ther
2006
;
5
:
2512
21
.
26
Oncomine database [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): Compendia Bioscience, Inc.; 2008 [cited 2009 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.oncomine.com.
27
Gene Expression Omnibus [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information [cited 2009 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
28
Rakha
EA
,
Ellis
IO
. 
Triple-negative/basal-like breast cancer: review
.
Pathology
2009
;
41
:
40
7
.
29
Chung
CH
,
Parker
JS
,
Karaca
G
, et al
. 
Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression
.
Cancer Cell
2004
;
5
:
489
500
.
30
O'Reilly
KE
,
Rojo
F
,
She
QB
, et al
. 
mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt
.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
1500
8
.
31
Faivre
S
,
Kroemer
G
,
Raymond
E
. 
Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents
.
Nat Rev Drug Discov
2006
;
5
:
671
88
.
32
Yokogami
K
,
Wakisaka
S
,
Avruch
J
,
Reeves
SA
. 
Serine phosphorylation and maximal activation of STAT3 during CNTF signaling is mediated by the rapamycin target mTOR
.
Curr Biol
2000
;
10
:
47
50
.
33
Tan
TT
,
Coussens
LM
. 
Humoral immunity, inflammation and cancer
.
Curr Opin Immunol
2007
;
19
:
209
16
.
34
DeNardo
DG
,
Coussens
LM
. 
Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression
.
Breast Cancer Res
2007
;
9
:
212
.
35
Bollrath
J
,
Phesse
TJ
,
von Burstin
VA
, et al
. 
gp130-mediated Stat3 activation in enterocytes regulates cell survival and cell-cycle progression during colitis-associated tumorigenesis
.
Cancer Cell
2009
;
15
:
91
102
.
36
Grivennikov
S
,
Karin
E
,
Terzic
J
, et al
. 
IL-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer
.
Cancer Cell
2009
;
15
:
103
13
.
37
Chan
KS
,
Sano
S
,
Kiguchi
K
, et al
. 
Disruption of Stat3 reveals a critical role in both the initiation and the promotion stages of epithelial carcinogenesis
.
J Clin Invest
2004
;
114
:
720
8
.
38
Sano
S
,
Chan
KS
,
Carbajal
S
, et al
. 
Stat3 links activated keratinocytes and immunocytes required for development of psoriasis in a novel transgenic mouse model
.
Nat Med
2005
;
11
:
43
9
.
39
Molinolo
AA
,
Hewitt
SM
,
Amornphimoltham
P
, et al
. 
Dissecting the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling network: emerging results from the head and neck cancer tissue array initiative
.
Clin Cancer Res
2007
;
13
:
4964
73
.
40
Deshpande
AM
,
Wong
DT
. 
Molecular mechanisms of head and neck cancer
.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther
2008
;
8
:
799
809
.