The success of adoptive cell transfer in the treatment of metastatic cancer in humans is dependent on the selection of highly active tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells. We report here that CTLs capture membrane fragments from their targets while exerting cytotoxic activity and thus gain a detectable functional signature by which they can be identified. Fluorochrome labeling or biotinylation was used to tag tumor cells. CD8+ T cells were coincubated with the tagged targets, sorted, and functionally evaluated. Our results show that membrane capture by CD8+ lymphocytes is T-cell receptor dependent, epitope specific, and preferentially associated with highly cytotoxic clonal subsets. CTLs that captured membranes from unmodified melanoma exhibited enhanced cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines and autologous melanoma. In a human melanoma in vivo model, adoptive transfer of membrane-capturing, peptide-specific T cells, but not noncapturing or bulk CD8+ T cells, inhibits tumor progression. Membrane capture is therefore a signature of antigen-specific CTLs endowed with high functional avidity and may have direct relevance in the clinical application of adoptive immunotherapy. [Cancer Res 2008;68(6):2006–13]

Tumor-reactive CTLs play a major role in antitumor responses, and the generation of ample amounts of these effectors is the desired outcome of immunotherapeutic strategies. The ability of CTLs to mediate cancer regression is best shown in adoptive cell therapy, a potent new anticancer immunotherapy yielding 50% objective responses in metastatic melanoma patients (1, 2).

Two approaches are widely applied for detection and isolation of antigen-specific CTLs. The first uses pMHC multimers to enumerate and separate antigen-specific CD8+ T cells from the whole lymphocyte population (3, 4). The need for a priori knowledge of exact peptide-MHC specificity is a major limiting factor for evaluating complex T-cell responses against a broad repertoire of antigens. An alternative strategy, allowing both monitoring of immune response and isolation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, is based on assessment of specific functions, such as cytokine (typically IFN-γ) production (5, 6), or activation-induced phenotypical alterations, such as cell surface expression of CD107a (LAMP-1; ref. 7) and CD137 (4-1BB; ref. 8). IFN-γ production is the most commonly used variable to detect T-cell reactivity against antigen-presenting targets. Cytokine-producing CD8+ T cells are not necessarily cytotoxic (7, 9, 10), and consequently in the therapeutic context, it is important to distinguish T-cell reactivity from “functional cytotoxicity,” specifically the capacity of CTLs to destroy target cells. Due to the diversity of effector functions used by T-cell subsets to kill their targets (11), a signature that integrates multiple function/molecules associated with the process of target destruction is required.

It has previously been shown that T cells acquire pMHC from antigen-presenting cells (APC; ref. 12). This process occurs in a MHC-restricted, antigen-specific manner and takes place at the immune synapse (13). Following the T cell-APC interaction, pMHC-T-cell receptor (TCR) complexes cluster at the cell-to-cell contact area and are internalized by lymphocytes. Other molecules, such as B7-1/2 and ICAM-1, are acquired in parallel with pMHC (14, 15). The mechanism underlying the acquisition of different molecules from APC into T cells was addressed by Hudrisier et al. (16). In their 2001 report, they showed that, following sustained TCR signaling, CTLs promptly capture target cell membranes from cells with which they interact. Transfer of cell membrane fragments from target to effector cell was termed “trogocytosis” and was shown to be TCR dependent (13, 16, 17). Trogocytosis forms the basis of an assay for T-cell recognition of APCs by protein transfer (18). Detection of antigen-specific T cells based on trogocytosis was shown in murine models and focused on APCs as target cells from which T cells acquire membranes (19). The membrane capture phenomenon has been described to occur between tumor cell lines and human bulk lymphocytes (20) and natural killer (NK) cells (21). Recently published reports used and supported the reliability of the trogocytosis phenomenon for detection of antigen-reactive CD8+ T cells (18, 22).

In this report, we explore the membrane capture phenomenon in a human melanoma model. Our results show that CTLs capable of performing trogocytosis can be isolated and that they comprise a CD8+ T-cell subset endowed with improved cytotoxic capacity. Thus, the phenomenon of trogocytosis can enable detection and isolation of functionally cytotoxic, tumor-specific CD8+ T cells.

Mice and cell lines. Male CD1nu/nu mice (8–12 wk old) were purchased from Harlan Laboratories. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. All experiments were conducted in accordance with Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital Animal Facility and NIH guidelines. T2 is a TAP-2–deficient lymphoblastoid line of HLA-A2 genotype. The 624mel (HLA-A2+) melanoma cell line was provided by M. Parkhurst (Surgery Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD). Melanoma cell lines M171, M181, and M579 (all HLA-A2) were established in the Sharett Institute of Oncology/Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital laboratory as described (23). The M579-A2 clone is a stable HLA-A2 transfectant of M579 cells, established after transfection with pcDNA3-HLA-A2 plasmid (kind gift of P. Robbins, Surgery Branch, NIH). The expression of HLA-A2 was evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using an HLA-A2–specific BB7.2 monoclonal antibody (mAb; AbD Serotec). The expression of MART-1 and gp100 was evaluated by immunostaining using A-103 and HMB-45 mAbs, respectively (Dako). All cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, and combined antibiotics. M579-A2 cells were maintained in the same medium supplemented with 1 mg/mL geneticin (Life Technologies). Human lymphocytes were cultured in complete medium consisting of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, 1% nonessential amino acids, 25 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4), 50 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol, and combined antibiotics.

Generation of peptide-reactive T-cell populations. Generation of peptide-reactive T-cell populations from patients with metastatic melanoma was performed as previously described with minor modifications (24). gp100209-217(210M), gp100154-162, gp100280-288(288V), MART-127-35(27L), or MUC-163-71 peptides [all commercially synthesized and purified (>95%) by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography by Biomer Technology] were used to stimulate HLA-A2+ bulk melanoma patient–derived lymphocytes. Commercially available ELISA reagents (R&D Systems) were used to detect IFN-γ secretion as an estimate for specific recognition of peptides by T cells following their coincubation with peptide-pulsed T2 cells or HLA-A2+ melanoma cells. The peptide-reactive cultures were expanded with 30 ng/mL ortho-anti-CD3 (eBioscience), recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2; 300 IU/mL; Chiron B.V.), and 5 × 106 allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as feeder cells.

In vitro stimulation of melanoma-specific lymphocytes. To enrich the tumor-reactive T-cell populations, cryopreserved PBMCs of melanoma patients that received autologous vaccine were thawed the day before stimulation and cultured in complete medium. Thereafter, the lymphocytes were plated in six-well plates (5 × 106 cells per well, 5 mL/well) in complete medium and stimulated by irradiated (17,000 rad) IFN-γ–treated (50 units/mL; Prospec) autologous tumor cells (5 × 105 per well). Two days later, 300 IU/mL IL-2 was added and renewed every 2 d. In some experiments, CD8+ lymphocytes were purified from thawed PBMC with magnetic beads (BD Biosciences) and then stimulated with autologous melanoma cells. On day 12, the enriched tumor-reactive T-cell cultures were harvested, washed in complete medium, and used in membrane capture assays.

Membrane capture assays and flow cytometry. T2 cells were pulsed with peptides (1 μmol/L) in Opti-MEM (Life Technologies) for 1 h at 37°C and washed twice in PBS. Melanoma cells and peptide-pulsed T2 targets were labeled with a fluorescent lipophilic dye DiI (Molecular Probes) or surface biotinylated with biotin-7-NHS (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions with minor modifications. For DiI labeling, 1 × 106/mL target cells were suspended in 1 μmol/L DiI in Opti-MEM and incubated for 5 min at 37°C and then for an additional 15 min at 4°C. For surface biotinylation, cells were suspended in buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1 mmol/L CaCl2, 1 mmol/L MgCl2 in PBS) containing 1 μg/mL biotin-7-NHS and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. In all cases, cold RPMI 1640 containing 10% AB serum was added to stop labeling (1:1 volume) for 10 min at 4°C and the cells were washed thrice with PBS containing 1% AB serum. Following resuspension in complete medium, labeled targets were cocultured with either peptide-reactive T-cell populations or melanoma-stimulated lymphocytes (5 × 105 per well in 200 μL final volume) in U-shaped 96-well plates in E:T ratios ranging from 3:1 to 1:1. Following incubation for 1 to 5 h at 37°C, cells were washed twice in PBS containing 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, to ensure conjugate dissociation, resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide, and stained with FITC-conjugated or PE-Cy5–conjugated or APC-conjugated anti-human CD8 and/or CD4 (eBioscience), CD107a (BD PharMingen), or isotype control mAbs. For specific TCR staining, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated HLA-A*0201-MART-126-35 or HLA-A*0201-gp100154-162 dextramers (Dako) for 30 min at 4°C. The samples were washed and analyzed by FACScan and “FCS Express” software (De Novo). Membrane capture by effector cells was measured by detection of DiI on the CD8+-gated population or by labeling with PE-Cy5–conjugated or PE-conjugated streptavidin (eBioscience) when biotinylated targets were used.

Cell sorting and cytotoxicity assays. Following coincubation with irradiated DiI-labeled melanoma cells, DiI+ (cap+) and DiI (cap) or bulk CD8+ lymphocytes were sorted by FACSAria (BD). When biotinylated targets were used, CD8+ T cells were initially purified from autologous melanoma-stimulated bulk PBMC with EasySep CD8+ negative selection kit (StemCell Technologies). Biotin+ (cap+) and biotin (cap) CD8+ lymphocytes were purified using positive selection with IMag streptavidin magnetic beads (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In both cases, purified cells were expanded in vitro with IL-2 and ortho-anti-CD3 and then examined for cytotoxic activity. In vitro cytotoxicity assays were performed as described (25). Briefly, lymphocytes were washed, resuspended in complete medium, and admixed at different ratios with 5,000 [35S]l-methionine–labeled melanoma or peptide-pulsed T2 cells. CTL assays were done in U-shaped microtiter wells at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 5 h. Percentage of specific lysis was calculated as follows: % lysis = (cpm in experimental well − cpm spontaneous release) / (cpm maximal release − cpm spontaneous release) × 100.

Adoptive immunotherapy of CD1nu/nu mice bearing human melanoma. Male CD1nu/nu mice were injected s.c. in the upper back with 1 × 106 624mel cells admixed 1:1 with Matrigel (BD Biosciences). Five days later, mice were injected in the tumor area with 1 × 106 cap+CD8+ or capCD8+ lymphocytes obtained after coincubation of gp100154-162–reactive T cells and DiI-stained 624mel melanoma, sorting, and expansion as described above. Following T-cell transfer, mice were injected with 1,000 units IL-2 into the tumor site twice daily for 5 d. Survival of mice was monitored daily.

Peptide-specific CD8+ lymphocytes acquire membrane fragments from pulsed APCs and melanoma targets. The antigen/TCR dependence of trogocytosis by CD8+ lymphocytes has been shown in mouse models (18, 26). With the aim of studying the trogocytosis phenomenon in the context of human lymphocytes raised against melanoma-associated antigen/s, we made use of peptide-stimulated T cells. To this end, HLA-A*0201 (A2+)-restricted T-cell populations recognizing gp100154-162, gp100209-217, gp100280-288, MART-127-35, and melanoma-irrelevant MUC-163-71 peptides were generated from melanoma patient–derived PBMC using in vitro stimulations with antigen and IL-2, as described (24). Antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion and cytotoxic activity of the populations were confirmed against cognate peptide-pulsed T2 cells and A2+ melanoma cell lines (data not shown). To examine the ability of melanoma antigen–specific T cells to procure target cell membrane fragments, peptide-pulsed T2 and melanoma cells were labeled with lipophilic dye DiI and coincubated with the T cells. Trogocytosis was measured by detection of DiI on CD8+ T cells using flow cytometry. CD8+ T cells acquired DiI following coincubation with the cognate but not with irrelevant peptide-pulsed T2 targets (Fig. 1A). The percentages of DiI+CD8+ membrane-capturing (cap+) lymphocytes among the total CD8+ population ranged from 34% to 61%, whereas nonspecific DiI staining was <3%. We next examined whether peptide-specific T cells can capture membrane fragments through binding with endogenously derived pMHC complexes on the surface of tumor cells. To this end, the lymphocytes were coincubated (1–18 h) with DiI-stained or biotinylated A2+ and A2 melanoma targets followed by detection of the captured target membranes on the CD8+ T cells. As shown in Fig. 1A, membrane capture by gp100-reactive and MART-1–reactive lymphocytes was clearly detectable when 624mel melanoma cells (A2+, gp100+, and MART-1+) were used as targets. The A2 melanoma line M181 (A2, gp100+, and MART-1+) and the melanoma-irrelevant anti–MUC-1 CTLs revealed only background levels of trogocytosis. The A2 transfectant of melanoma line M579 (MART-1+/gp100+) was used to emphasize the HLA restriction of trogocytosis (Fig. 1B). Eleven percent and 35% of MART-127-35–specific and gp100280-288–specific CD8+ T cells procured membrane fragments from M579-A2+ but not from the A2 parental M579 melanoma, excluding the effect of nonspecific target-related factors.

Antigen-dependent trogocytosis was evident after 15 min of incubation, peaked by 1 h, and remained unchanged during the following 1 to 5 h. Long-term incubation (>5 h) was associated with an increase of nonspecific dye acquisition (data not shown). By adding CD4+ autologous T cells to the CD8+ anti–MART-127-35 T-cell population, we have excluded “bystander” tagging of uninvolved T cells scavenging dye or membrane fragments (data not shown). Membrane capture from labeled 624mel by MART-127-35–specific CD8+ T cells was visualized by confocal microscopy (Fig. 1C,, left and middle). Captured membrane fragments appear as single spots or tightly clustered regions on cap+ lymphocytes. Consistent with flow cytometry results, there was no evidence of membrane capture by irrelevant T cells (Fig. 1C , right). Thus, these data show that human CD8+ lymphocytes capture membrane fragments from melanoma cells expressing naturally processed antigens in peptide-specific and MHC-restricted manner.

Trogocytosis is performed by a subset of CTLs derived from a population with identical TCR specificity. The T-cell populations we used in these experiments were generated through repeated stimulations of bulk PBMCs with peptides, a process that increases the frequency of peptide-reactive T cells but does not yield a purified single clone. We assumed that the ability to perform trogocytosis would be conferred to all T cells with the same TCR and thus would separate peptide-specific from other T cells. pMHC dextramers were used for direct assessment of the TCR specificity of membrane-capturing T cells. The MART-127-35–reactive and gp100154-162–reactive CD8+ lymphocytes were analyzed according to their membrane capture capacity following coincubation with peptide-pulsed, DiI-stained T2 targets. As expected, all trogocytosis-performing CD8+ T cells were dextramer+, whereas nearly all dextramer lymphocytes were unable to trogocytose, attesting that TCR recognition is mandatory for this phenomenon. Surprisingly, however, 58% of the noncapturing (cap) population consisted of dextramer+ T cells (Fig. 2A). As shown in Fig. 2B, only 28% of the MART-126-35-dextramer+ and 44% of the gp100154-162-dextramer+ CD8+ T cells were membrane-capturing cells. This shows that TCR-specific recognition is an imperative factor but is not the sole determinant of membrane capture capacity of CD8+ T cells.

Trogocytosis is a feature of highly avid, functionally cytotoxic T cells. The functional distinction of cap+ and cap T cells was addressed in the next set of experiments. cap+ T cells were compared with cap or bulk CD8+ T cells in cytotoxicity assays against peptide-pulsed and melanoma targets. Peptide-reactive T-cell populations and PBMC of melanoma patients who previously participated in an adjuvant protocol of melanoma cell vaccination were used in these experiments (27). To increase tumor-specific T-cell frequencies, 12-day in vitro stimulation with autologous melanoma preceded T-cell evaluation. gp100154-162–reactive CD8+ lymphocytes were coincubated with irradiated DiI-labeled 624mel cells and sorted by FACS into distinct fractions according to their membrane capture ability. The results of [35S]methionine release assay show that cytotoxicity was exclusively conferred to cap+ lymphocytes with 40% specific lysis at 1:1 E:T ratio (Fig. 3A). capCD8+ T cells failed to lyse specific peptide-pulsed T2 targets, yielding low reactivity similar to that of irrelevant effectors (Fig. 3A; data not shown). The improved reactivity of cap+CD8+ cells was reproduced when compared with bulk CD8+ T cells. Following sorting and in vitro expansion, as described above, the membrane-capturing and bulk lymphocytes were assayed against peptide-pulsed targets and 624mel (A2+) or M171 (A2) melanomas. As shown in Fig. 3B, cap+CD8+ T cells exhibited 2- to 3-fold higher lysis of cognate peptide-pulsed targets than unsorted lymphocytes. Moreover, the enriched lymphocytes were even more efficient (4- to 5-fold enhanced cytotoxic activity compared with bulk CD8+ cells) when 624mel melanoma cells were used as targets (Fig. 3C).

At this point, it was evident that trogocytosis is a functional marker that can potentially be used for detection and isolation of high-avidity CTLs from patient-derived PBMC containing low frequencies of tumor-specific lymphocytes. To address this issue, bulk PBMCs were enriched for CD8+ T cells using negative selection with magnetic beads followed by 12-day stimulation with autologous melanoma, as described in Materials and Methods. Due to the low frequency of tumor-specific T cells in stimulated bulk CD8+ lymphocytes, we used the streptavidin-based detection method of trogocytosis. According to our results (data not shown) and to observations made by others (26), tagging of target membrane with biotin followed by its detection with streptavidin is more sensitive than DiI. With this system, melanoma patient–derived CD8+ T cells were separated into cap+ (biotin+) and cap fractions after coincubation with biotinylated autologous M171 melanoma. The lymphocytes were then expanded in vitro and their cytotoxic activity against autologous melanoma was examined. As shown in Fig. 3D, cap+ CTLs lysed autologous M171 but not HLA-mismatched 624mel melanoma cells in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with capCD8+, the cap+CD8+ cells were 2- to 3-fold more effective at destroying the autologous melanoma (Fig. 3D). Taken together, these data show that CD8+ T cells capable of trogocytosis contain high-avidity antitumor lymphocytes that exhibit enhanced cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines and autologous melanoma.

Membrane capture capacity of CTLs correlates with their activation-induced degranulation. CD107a is a membrane glycoprotein of cytotoxic granules; its surface expression on CTLs correlates with degranulation and has been used as a surrogate marker for their cytolytic activity (7). We measured CD107a mobilization and membrane capture by melanoma patient–derived T cells following 5-h coincubation with DiI-labeled tumor cells. Membrane capture paralleled CD107a expression when both autologous M171 tumor (specific targets) and HLA-mismatched 624mel melanoma or autologous PBMCs (negative controls) were used (Fig. 4A and B). To correlate membrane capture with cytolytic activity of CTLs, CD8+ T cells from three melanoma patients were incubated with labeled autologous tumor cells and concomitantly analyzed for DiI acquisition and CD107a mobilization. Based on DiI intensity, the lymphocytes were divided into three subsets (cap, caplow, and caphigh) and plotted against the corresponding CD107a expression. Supporting our data from CTL assays (Fig. 3), the vast majority of cytolytic T lymphocytes were detected in the membrane-capturing population. Furthermore, the percentage of CD107a+ cells was 1.4- to 2-fold higher in caphigh than in caplow CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4C). More than 95% of noncapturing lymphocytes were CD107a. Thus, the reliability of membrane capture as a measure of functional cytotoxicity is supported by CD107a mobilization results.

Trogocytosis-performing CD8+ T cells inhibit in vivo melanoma growth. Finally, we tested the in vivo antitumor activity of membrane-capturing CD8+ T cells in two experimental settings: compared with noncapturing cells (Fig. 5A) and with bulk CD8+ lymphocytes (Fig. 5B). To this end, we established a model of adoptive transfer of human lymphocytes into nude mice bearing human melanoma. Testing different melanoma cell lines, we found that 624mel cells at 1 × 106 admixed with Matrigel formed homogenous s.c. tumors in 100% of nude mice. The adoptive transfer of CD8+ T cells was carried out basically according to the previously proposed experimental scheme (25). Consistent with this scheme, nude mice were challenged s.c. with 624mel cells, and 5 days later, after formation of visible tumors, CD8+ T cells were injected around the tumors followed by local s.c. administration of IL-2 twice daily for 5 more days. gp100154-162–reactive CD8+ T-cell populations were separated based on membrane capture from labeled 624mel melanoma cells. Separated or bulk CD8+ T cells were expanded in vitro as described and transferred to nude mice challenged with 624mel cells. Fifty percent (three of six) and 44% (four of nine) of mice were alive at 90 days following transfer of cap+ T cells compared with none in mice treated with bulk or capCD8+ T cells, respectively (Fig. 5C and D). Therefore, only those CD8+ T cells that capture membrane fragments from tumor targets inhibit melanoma growth in vivo.

This is the first study to elucidate the phenomenon of trogocytosis in the context of human melanoma-CD8+ T-cell interactions. Our results show that membrane capture by CD8+ lymphocytes is a signature of tumor antigen–specific T cells of the highest functional cytotoxicity. The immediate implication of the membrane capture phenomenon is that it opens a new option to identify and expand high-avidity antitumor CTLs. Various reports have described the membrane capture phenomenon in murine experimental systems in vitro (14, 15, 19, 28) and in vivo (29). In contrast, only a few cases have been reported for human T cells in the context of cell-to-cell interaction with human tumor cells. Acquisition of membrane patches from hematopoietic tumor cells has been reported for human NK and bulk CD4, CD8 αβ, and γδ T cells (20, 30). To the best of our knowledge, the results presented here provide new evidence for antigen-specific transfer of labeled membrane patches from unmodified melanoma targets to cognate CD8+ T cells (Figs. 1 and 4). To show this, we used T-cell populations of known specificity paired with HLA-matched tumor lines or patient's bulk PBMC paired with the autologous tumor. The HLA restriction of the capture by CD8+ T cells was strongly confirmed using HLA-A2+ transfectant of M579 cell line versus parental M579 melanoma (Fig. 1B). Our results are in line with murine studies showing TCR-MHC dependency of antigen-specific trogocytosis of peptide-pulsed targets (16, 26). Furthermore, the TCR molecule is directly involved in the process of trogocytosis (12). As was shown for other receptors of the tyrosine kinase receptor family, TCR is internalized following the linkage to its pMHC ligand (16, 31). Our results show decreased staining intensity of CD8 on membrane-capturing T cells, suggesting TCR internalization as a consequence of trogocytosis (Fig. 1A). Using multimer (dextramer) staining of melanoma antigen–specific T-cell populations, we further explored the relationship of TCR specificity to the trogocytosis phenomenon. Our data revealed that, although TCR specificity is vital for trogocytosis, it does not exclusively determine the ability of CTL to acquire membrane fragments (Fig. 2). T cells with the same TCR specificity are not necessarily identical in their overall functional avidity and, as a result, antigen reactivity (32). The relatively low TCR affinity and/or functional avidity could account for the lack of measurable trogocytosis by melanoma antigen–specific CD8+ T-cell subsets.

TCR ligation is one component in the wider context of the immunologic synapse, occurring between an immune effector cell and its target. The “synapse” consists of an attachment zone between the two cellular parties where clusters of molecules gather to increase the likelihood of receptor-ligand interactions (33, 34). Assuming that the magnitude of trogocytosis will reflect the strength of the immunologic synapse, we looked for functional correlations of trogocytosis-performing and nonperforming CD8+ T cells. Our results show a strong connection between the trogocytosis ability of CD8+ T cells and their cytotoxic activity against peptide-pulsed APC and, more importantly, unmodified tumor targets (Figs. 3 and 4). Recently, increased cytotoxic activity of trogocytosis-capable murine lymphocytes has been reported (19). In that study, ovalbumin-primed lymphocytes were sorted based on their trogocytosis activity against OVA257-264–pulsed APCs and then assayed against OVA257-264–pulsed EL4 targets. In contrast to this experimental system, we used human tumor cell lines and/or autologous melanoma for both lymphocyte sorting and as targets in cytotoxicity assays. The important hallmark of high-avidity functional CD8+ T cells is their reactivity against tumor cells presenting endogenous antigens, additionally to peptide-pulsed artificial APCs (7). Our data illustrate increased cytotoxic activity of trogocytosis-capable CD8+ T cells against tumor cell lines and autologous melanoma (Fig. 3). A use of melanoma cells for trogocytosis-based sorting of polyclonal tumor-specific lymphocytes represents a significant advantage over using peptide-pulsed APCs. The functional cytotoxicity of T cells capable of membrane capture was shown by direct cytotoxicity assays and was supported with the marker of degranulation, CD107a. This marker was extremely useful to detect lower-frequency, tumor-specific CD8+ T cells within bulk PBMC of melanoma patients. The observed reduced killing of tumor compared with artificial APC by trogocytosis-capable effectors could be attributed to the apparently lower number of pMHC complexes presented on melanoma tumor cells versus peptide-pulsed APC (35). Alternatively, tumors can resist TCR-mediated lysis by impairment of antigen presentation or through the aberrant expression of PD-L1, a ligand of PD-1 receptor on CTLs, which normally inhibits TCR signaling (36, 37). Selection of cap+ T cells by their ability to capture membranes from a tumor target enables the demarcation of T cells that overcome tumor evasiveness.

Finally, to test the in vivo potential of CD8+ T cells capable of trogocytosis, we used an adoptive transfer model (38) in which human melanoma-bearing mice were treated by lymphocytes transferred to the tumor vicinity. Our results clearly show that trogocytosing T cells confers the best inhibition of tumor growth compared with any other population tested (Fig. 5). This is the first evidence for the antitumor activity of T cells capable of membrane capture in the tumor-bearing host. This peritumoral adoptive cell transfer approach paves the road for the implementation of trogocytosis in systemic adoptive cell immunotherapy, currently under way in our laboratory.

In conclusion, we show that antigen-specific membrane capture by CD8+ T cells is a feature of highly functional CTLs. Polyclonal tumor-reactive CTLs can be isolated from bulk lymphocytes using tumor targets expressing natural antigen levels. T cells with membrane capture ability that gain their functional signature from unmodified tumor cells in vitro may eventually mediate tumor regression in vivo. Understanding the mechanism of trogocytosis between CD8+ T cells and tumor cells will benefit the future design of adoptive cell therapy of cancer.

Grant support: Israel Cancer Association and Horowitz Foundation.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes.
Science
2002
;
298
:
850
–4.
2
Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Yang JC, et al. Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
2346
–57.
3
Cobbold M, Khan N, Pourgheysari B, et al. Adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus-specific CTL to stem cell transplant patients after selection by HLA-peptide tetramers.
J Exp Med
2005
;
202
:
379
–86.
4
Dunbar PR, Chen JL, Chao D, et al. Cutting edge: rapid cloning of tumor-specific CTL suitable for adoptive immunotherapy of melanoma.
J Immunol
1999
;
162
:
6959
–62.
5
Manz R, Assenmacher M, Pfluger E, Miltenyi S, and Radbruch A. Analysis and sorting of live cells according to secreted molecules, relocated to a cell-surface affinity matrix.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1995
;
92
:
1921
–5.
6
Becker C, Pohla H, Frankenberger B, et al. Adoptive tumor therapy with T lymphocytes enriched through an IFN-γ capture assay.
Nat Med
2001
;
7
:
1159
–62.
7
Rubio V, Stuge TB, Singh N, et al. Ex vivo identification, isolation and analysis of tumor-cytolytic T cells.
Nat Med
2003
;
9
:
1377
–82.
8
Wolfl M, Kuball J, Ho WY, et al. Activation-induced expression of CD137 permits detection, isolation, and expansion of the full repertoire of CD8+ T cells responding to antigen without requiring knowledge of epitope specificities.
Blood
2007
;
110
:
201
–10.
9
Panelli MC, Riker A, Kammula U, et al. Expansion of tumor-T cell pairs from fine needle aspirates of melanoma metastases.
J Immunol
2000
;
164
:
495
–504.
10
Snyder JE, Bowers WJ, Livingstone AM, Lee FE, Federoff HJ, Mosmann TR. Measuring the frequency of mouse and human cytotoxic T cells by the Lysispot assay: independent regulation of cytokine secretion and short-term killing.
Nat Med
2003
;
9
:
231
–5.
11
Mosmann TR, Li L, Sad S. Functions of CD8 T-cell subsets secreting different cytokine patterns.
Semin Immunol
1997
;
9
:
87
–92.
12
Huang JF, Yang Y, Sepulveda H, et al. TCR-mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells.
Science
1999
;
286
:
952
–4.
13
Stinchcombe JC, Bossi G, Booth S, Griffiths GM. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges.
Immunity
2001
;
15
:
751
–61.
14
Hwang I, Huang JF, Kishimoto H, et al. T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecules derived from antigen-presenting cells.
J Exp Med
2000
;
191
:
1137
–48.
15
Wetzel SA, McKeithan TW, Parker DC. Peptide-specific intercellular transfer of MHC class II to CD4+ T cells directly from the immunological synapse upon cellular dissociation.
J Immunol
2005
;
174
:
80
–9.
16
Hudrisier D, Riond J, Mazarguil H, Gairin JE, Joly E. Cutting edge: CTLs rapidly capture membrane fragments from target cells in a TCR signaling-dependent manner.
J Immunol
2001
;
166
:
3645
–9.
17
Joly E, Hudrisier D. What is trogocytosis and what is its purpose?
Nat Immunol
2003
;
4
:
815
.
18
Beadling C, Slifka MK. Quantifying viable virus-specific T cells without a priori knowledge of fine epitope specificity.
Nat Med
2006
;
12
:
1208
–12.
19
Daubeuf S, Puaux AL, Joly E, Hudrisier D. A simple trogocytosis-based method to detect, quantify, characterize and purify antigen-specific live lymphocytes by flow cytometry, via their capture of membrane fragments from antigen-presenting cells.
Nat Protoc
2006
;
1
:
2536
–42.
20
Poupot M, Pont F, Fournie JJ. Profiling blood lymphocyte interactions with cancer cells uncovers the innate reactivity of human γδ T cells to anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
J Immunol
2005
;
174
:
1717
–22.
21
Caumartin J, Favier B, Daouya M, et al. Trogocytosis-based generation of suppressive NK cells.
EMBO J
2007
;
26
:
1423
–33.
22
Tomaru U, Yamano Y, Nagai M, et al. Detection of virus-specific T cells and CD8+ T-cell epitopes by acquisition of peptide-HLA-GFP complexes: analysis of T-cell phenotype and function in chronic viral infections.
Nat Med
2003
;
9
:
469
–76.
23
Topalian SL, Solomon D, Rosenberg SA. Tumor-specific cytolysis by lymphocytes infiltrating human melanomas.
J Immunol
1989
;
142
:
3714
–25.
24
Riley JP, Rosenberg SA, Parkhurst MR. Stimulation of tumor-reactive T lymphocytes using mixtures of synthetic peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens with diverse MHC binding affinities.
J Immunol Methods
2003
;
276
:
103
–19.
25
Machlenkin A, Goldberger O, Tirosh B, et al. Combined dendritic cell cryotherapy of tumor induces systemic antimetastatic immunity.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
4955
–61.
26
Puaux AL, Campanaud J, Salles A, et al. A very rapid and simple assay based on trogocytosis to detect and measure specific T and B cell reactivity by flow cytometry.
Eur J Immunol
2006
;
36
:
779
–88.
27
Lotem M, Peretz T, Drize O, et al. Autologous cell vaccine as a post operative adjuvant treatment for high-risk melanoma patients (AJCC stages III and IV). The new American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Br J Cancer
2002
;
86
:
1534
–9.
28
Patel DM, Arnold PY, White GA, Nardella JP, Mannie MD. Class II MHC/peptide complexes are released from APC and are acquired by T cell responders during specific antigen recognition.
J Immunol
1999
;
163
:
5201
–10.
29
Riond J, Elhmouzi J, Hudrisier D, Gairin JE. Capture of membrane components via trogocytosis occurs in vivo during both dendritic cells and target cells encounter by CD8(+) T cells.
Scand J Immunol
2007
;
66
:
441
–50.
30
LeMaoult J, Caumartin J, Daouya M, et al. Immune regulation by pretenders: cell-to-cell transfers of HLA-G make effector T cells act as regulatory cells.
Blood
2007
;
109
:
2040
–8.
31
Viola A, Salio M, Tuosto L, Linkert S, Acuto O, Lanzavecchia A. Quantitative contribution of CD4 and CD8 to T cell antigen receptor serial triggering.
J Exp Med
1997
;
186
:
1775
–9.
32
Johnson LA, Heemskerk B, Powell DJ Jr, et al. Gene transfer of tumor-reactive TCR confers both high avidity and tumor reactivity to nonreactive peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
J Immunol
2006
;
177
:
6548
–59.
33
Dustin ML. A dynamic view of the immunological synapse.
Semin Immunol
2005
;
17
:
400
–10.
34
Anton van der Merwe P, Davis SJ, Shaw AS, Dustin ML. Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition.
Semin Immunol
2000
;
12
:
5
–21.
35
Cohen CJ, Hoffmann N, Farago M, Hoogenboom HR, Eisenbach L, Reiter Y. Direct detection and quantitation of a distinct T-cell epitope derived from tumor-specific epithelial cell-associated mucin using human recombinant antibodies endowed with the antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted specificity of T cells.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
5835
–44.
36
Khong HT, Restifo NP. Natural selection of tumor variants in the generation of “tumor escape” phenotypes.
Nat Immunol
2002
;
3
:
999
–1005.
37
Iwai Y, Ishida M, Tanaka Y, Okazaki T, Honjo T, Minato N. Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2002
;
99
:
12293
–7.
38
Machlenkin A, Paz A, Bar Haim E, et al. Human CTL epitopes prostatic acid phosphatase-3 and six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate-3 as candidates for prostate cancer immunotherapy.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
6435
–42.