Salmonella enterica and avirulent derivatives prefer solid tumors over normal tissue in animal models. The identification of endogenous Salmonella promoters that are preferentially activated in tumors could further our understanding of this phenomenon. Toward this goal, a random library of S. enterica typhimurium 14028 genomic DNA was cloned upstream of a promoterless gene encoding the green fluorescent protein (GFP) TurboGFP. A population of Salmonella containing this library was injected i.v. into tumor-free nude mice and into human PC3 prostate tumors growing subcutaneously in nude mice. After 2 days, fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to enrich for bacterial clones expressing GFP from spleens or tumors. The resulting libraries were hybridized to an oligonucleotide tiling array of the Salmonella genome. Eighty-six intergenic regions were found to be enriched in tumor samples but not in spleen. Twenty of these candidate promoters were also detected in the sequences of 100 random clones from a library enriched for expression in bacteria growing in tumors. Three candidate promoter clones were individually tested in vivo, and enhanced GFP expression in bacteria growing in tumor relative to spleen was confirmed. Two of the three clones (pflE and ansB promoter regions) are known to be induced in hypoxic conditions that pertain to many tumors. For many of the other candidate promoters preferentially induced in bacteria growing in tumors, regulatory mechanisms may not be related to hypoxia. The expression of therapeutics in Salmonella under the regulation of one or more promoters that are activated preferentially in tumors has the potential to improve the targeting of drug delivery. [Cancer Res 2008;68(12):4827–32]

Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium is a facultative anaerobic bacterium that naturally accumulates in a wide variety of solid tumors as opposed to normal tissue (110). Avirulent mutants of this bacterium prefer tumors over normal tissue at ratios that range between 250:1 and 9,000:1 (1, 11), and can lead to tumor reduction or cures in animal models (2). Necrotic regions of the tumor are hypoxic and relatively acidic compared with normal tissues (12, 13). The ability of Salmonella to accumulate in tumors may be due to such differences (14), and perhaps other mechanisms not yet established. To investigate this phenomenon, a high-throughput method was used to screen for Salmonella promoters that are preferentially expressed in tumors versus spleen. A random library of Salmonella DNA fragments was cloned upstream of a promoterless green fluorescent protein (GFP) to monitor Salmonella promoter activation in human-PC3 tumors in nude mice. Differential fluorescence induction (15, 16) was captured using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to enrich for promoters active in tumors, and separately, for promoters active in spleen. Libraries enriched for active promoters in bacteria growing in tumor and spleen were then compared using an oligonucleotide tiling array of the Salmonella genome. The behavior of three bacterial promoters active in tumors but not in spleen was subsequently individually confirmed in vivo.

Vector construction. Promoter trap plasmids with TurboGFP were generated by PCR from the pTurboGFP plasmid.4

The constructions, plasmids, bacterial strains, and primers used in this work are described in Supplementary Table S1.

Promoter library construction.S. enterica serovar typhimurium 14028 genomic DNA was sonicated and separated on a 1% agarose gel. Three hundred to 500 bp fragments were recovered from the gel and DNA ends were repaired by T4 DNA polymerase. Repaired fragments were cloned in a dephosphorylated pTurboGFP vector. Two libraries were constructed upstream of a promoterless TurboGFP, one stable and one destabilized. The two libraries combined (designated library-0) contained ∼180,000 independent Typhimurium fragments, representing ∼15-fold coverage of the 4.8 Mb genome, with clone spacing averaging every 25 bases. Hybridization to a Salmonella array showed that library-0 included sequences from almost the entire genome (deposited at GEO, GSE9998).5

NimbleGen array design. A high-resolution array was designed that contained 387,000 46-mer to 50-mer oligos, with the length adjusted to generate a similar predicted Tm. 377,230 of these probes were designed based on the Typhimurium LT2 genome (NC_003197; ref. 17). Oligonucleotides tiled the genome every 12 bases, on alternating strands. Thus, each base pair in the genome was represented in four to six oligonucleotides, with two to three oligos on each strand. Probes representing the three LT2 regions not present in the genome of the very closely related 14028s strain (phages Fels-1 and Fels-2, STM3255–3260) and >9,000 other oligos were included as controls for hybridization performance, synthesis performance, and grid alignment. The oligos were distributed in random positions across the array.

FACS analysis. Bacteria harboring the constitutive pTurboGFP plasmid were used as a positive control for the Becton Dickinson FACSAria FACS system. Side scatter ssc-w (X-axis) and ssc-H (Y-axis) were used to gate on single bacterial cells. GFP-fluorescence (GFP-A) on the X-axis and autofluorescence (PE) on the Y-axis permitted discrimination between green Salmonella cells and other fluorescent particles of different sizes. Fluorescent particles tended to be distributed on the diagonal of the GFP-A/PE plot, and had a fluorescence/autofluorescence ratio close to 1, whereas individual GFP-positive Salmonella cells had a higher ratio of fluorescence/autofluorescence and tended to be distributed close to the X-axis of the GFP-A/PE plot. Putative GFP-positive events in the window enriched for GFP-expressing Salmonella were sorted at a speed of ∼5,000 total events per second.

Enrichment of active promoters in spleen. To identify active Salmonella promoters in the spleen, five tumor-free nude mice were i.v. injected with 107 cfu of Salmonella carrying a promoter library. This library, designated “library-0” consisted of ∼180,000 plasmid clones each containing a fragment of the Salmonella genome upstream of a promoterless GFP (see experimental procedures). Two days after injection, spleens were combined, homogenized on ice, and treated thrice with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. An aliquot of the final homogenized sample was plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with 50 μg/mL of ampicillin (Amp) to determine the number of bacterial colony-forming units (cfu). The remainder of the bacteria in the sample was immediately separated by FACS. Fifty thousand potentially GFP-positive events were sorted and this sublibrary was grown overnight in LB+Amp and designated “library-1.” The spleen was chosen because it is the primary site of Salmonella accumulation in normal mice (18).

Enrichment of active promoters in tumor. The experimental design for tumor samples is described in Fig. 1. Five nude mice bearing human-PC3 prostate tumors, between 0.5 and 1 cm3 in size, were injected intratumorally with 107 cfu of Salmonella promoter library-0. Two days after injection, tumors were combined, homogenized on ice and washed, as above. An aliquot was plated to determine the number of bacterial colony-forming units. The remainder of the sample was immediately separated by FACS. Fifty thousand GFP-positive events were recovered and grown overnight in LB+Amp containing ampicillin (library-2). A small aliquot of these bacteria were then pelleted and resuspended in PBS (106 cfu/mL) and FACS sorted. GFP-negative events (106) were collected, grown in LB overnight, washed in PBS and reinjected into five human-PC3 tumors in nude mice. After 2 days, bacteria were extracted from tumors and 50,000 GFP-positive events were FACS sorted and expanded in LB+Amp (library-3). A biological replicate of library-3 was obtained by repeating the experiment from the beginning using library-0. This was designated library-4.

Genomewide survey on tumor-activated promoters using NimbleGen arrays. Plasmid DNA was extracted from the original promoter library (library-0), from clones activated in spleen (library-1), and from clones activated in subcutaneous PC3 tumors in nude mice after one (library-2) or two passages (library-3 and library-4) in tumors. Promoter sequences were recovered by PCR using primers Turbo-4F and Turbo-1R (Supplementary Table S1), and the PCR product was labeled by CY5 (library-0) and CY3 (library-1, library-2, library-3, library-4). The resulting products were then hybridized to an array of 387,000 oligonucleotide sequences positioned at 12-base intervals around the Typhimurium genome (using the manufacturer's protocol).6

Spot intensities were normalized based on total signal in each channel. The enrichment of genomic regions was measured by the intensity ratio of the tumor or the spleen sample versus the input library (library-0). A moving median of the ratio of tumor versus input library from 10 data points (∼170 bases) was calculated across the genome. The highest median of each intergenic and intragenic region was chosen to represent the most highly overrepresented region of that promoter or gene in the tested library. Using a threshold of (exp / control) ≥ 2, and enrichment in both replicates of the experiment (library-4, plus at least one of library-2 or library-3), there were 86 intergenic regions enriched in tumors but not in the spleen (Supplementary Table S2), and 154 intergenic regions enriched in both tumor and spleen (Supplementary Table S3). There were at least 30 regions enriched in spleen alone (Supplementary Table S4).

Sequencing of promoters. One hundred and ninety-two clones from a library that underwent two rounds of enrichment in tumor (library-3) were picked at random and sequenced, yielding 100 different sequences. These were mapped to the genome and their potential regulation (tumor-specific activation, or activation in both spleen and tumor) was determined by comparison with the microarray data (Table 1). The clones included 26 that were preferentially activated in tumors, and 40 that were activated both in tumor and spleen. 77% of the tumor-enriched clones (20 of 26) and 75% of the clones induced in both tumor and spleen (30 of 40) mapped at least partly to intergenic regions. As expected, none of these 100 clones were spleen-specific. The 20 intergenic clones supported by both biological replicates on array experiments are presented in Table 2.

Some possible tumor-specific promoters mapped inside annotated genes; 23% of the sequenced clones (6 of 26) and 18% of candidates identified by microarray (19 of 105; Supplementary Table S5). Some “promoters” may be artifacts that could arise from a variety of effects such as the inherent high copy number of the plasmid clone, or mutations that cause the copy number to increase or a new promoter to be created. However, based on data from Escherichia coli, a close relative of Salmonella, intragenic regions might indeed contain promoters, based on evidence from transcription start sites, binding sites for RNA polymerase (19, 20), and sigma factors (21) as well as motif finders (22). Further work may provide confirmatory evidence of promoter activity in some cases.

Some weaker promoters may generate detectable GFP in the stable, but not the destabilized, GFP plasmid library. Fifty clones sequenced after FACS selection could be assigned to either the stabilized or destabilized library. Forty of these were of the stable GFP variety versus an expected 25 of each type if there had been no bias. Therefore, the destabilized library is, as expected, underrepresented following FACS.

Confirmation of tumor specificity of individual clones in vivo. Five cloned promoters potentially activated in bacteria growing in tumor but not in the spleen were selected to be individually confirmed in vivo. A group of tumor-bearing mice and normal mice were injected i.v. with bacteria containing the cloned promoters. Tumors and spleens were imaged after 2 days, at low and high resolution using the Olympus OV100 small animal imaging system. Three of the five tumor-specific candidates (clones 10, 28, and 45) were induced much more in tumor than in spleen. Clone 44 produced low signals and clone 84 was highly expressed in tumor but was detectable in the spleen.

Among the most likely promoters to be uncovered in this study are those induced by hypoxia, which is thought to be an important contributor to Salmonella targeting of tumors (14). Salmonella promoters induced by hypoxia include those controlled directly or indirectly by the two global regulators of anaerobic metabolism, Fnr and ArcA (23). Clone 45 contains the promoter region of ansB, which encodes part of asparaginase. In E. coli, ansB is positively coregulated by Fnr and by CRP (cyclic AMP receptor protein), a carbon source utilization regulator (24). In S. enterica, the anaerobic regulation of ansB may require only CRP (25, 26). Clone 10 is the promoter region of a putative pyruvate-formate-lyase activating enzyme (pflE). This clone was only observed in library-3, but enrichment was considerable in that library (Table 2). This clone was pursued further because the operon is coregulated in E. coli by both ArcA and Fnr (27, 28). Finally, clone 28 contains the promoter region of flhB, a gene that is required for the formation of the flagellar apparatus (29) and is not known to be regulated in anaerobic metabolism.

Further screening was performed on these three clones. Bacteria containing these clones were i.v. injected at 5 × 106, 5 × 107, and 5 × 107 cfu into tumor- and non–tumor-bearing nude mice. One or 2 days postinjection, spleens and tumors were imaged using the OV100 imaging system, homogenized, and the bacterial titer was quantified on LB+Amp. Spleens from normal mice were compared with tumors that had a similar number of colony-forming units, so that any difference in fluorescence would be attributable to increased GFP expression rather than bacterial numbers. Figure 2 confirms that tumors are much more fluorescent than spleens infected with the same number of bacteria for each of the three clones. A positive control that constitutively expresses TurboGFP resulted in strong fluorescence in spleen even with doses as low as 2 × 105 cfu.

The Salmonella endogenous promoter for pepT is regulated by CRP and Fnr (14). In previous studies, the TATA and the Fnr binding sites of this promoter were modified to engineer a hypoxia-inducible promoter that drives reporter gene expression under both acute and chronic hypoxia in vitro (14). Induction of the engineered hypoxia-inducible promoter in vivo became detectable in mice 12 hours after death, when the mouse was globally hypoxic (14). In our experiments, the wild-type pepT intergenic region did not pass the threshold to be included in the tumor-specific promoter group. Perhaps the appropriate clone is not represented in the library, or induction (i.e., level of hypoxia in the PC3 tumors) was not enough for this particular promoter.

In summary, Salmonella thrives in the hypoxic conditions found in solid tumors (14). There are four promoters known to be regulated by hypoxia among the 20 sequenced intergenic clones (Table 2), of which two (clones 10 and 45) were tested and shown to be induced in tumors (Fig. 2). Many candidate promoters that seem to be preferentially activated within tumors may be unrelated to hypoxia, including clone 28 (Fig. 2). Any promoters that are later proven to respond in their natural context in the genome may illuminate conditions within tumors, other than hypoxia, that are sensed by Salmonella.

Attenuated Salmonella strains with tumor-targeting abilities (110) could be used to deliver therapeutics under the control of promoters preferentially induced in tumors. Such promoters are technically useful whether or not they are regulated in the same way in their natural context in the genome. These promoters would be tools to reduce the expression of the therapeutic in bacteria outside the tumor, and thus reduce side effects, thereby producing a highly selective and effective therapy for metastatic cancer. Further sophistications are also possible. For example, combinations of two or more promoters that are preferentially induced in tumors by different regulatory mechanisms would allow the delivery of two or more separate protein components of a therapeutic system under different regulatory pathways. In addition, new promoter systems induced by external agents such as arabinose (30) or salicylic acid (31) allow promoters in Salmonella to be induced throughout the body at the time of choice. Such inducible regulation could be combined with tumor-specific Salmonella promoters to express useful products in the tumor only when the exogenous activator is added; therapy delivery would be exquisitely controlled both in time and space.

The authors are pursuing the commercial application of engineered infectious agents to cancer therapeutics.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Grant support: NIH grants R01 AI034829, R01 AI052237, R21 AI057733, and by a grant from the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program of California grant no. TRDRP 16KT-0045 to Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and grants CA 103563, CA 119811, and DOD grant W81XWH-06-1-0117 to AntiCancer.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Carlos Santiviago for his interactions and discussions, and Pui Cheng at Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Charlene M. Cooper at AntiCancer for their technical assistance.

Accession numbers: microarray hybridization data are accessible as GSE9998 at the GEO depository of the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).

1
Pawelek JM, Low KB, Bermudes D. Tumor-targeted Salmonella as a novel anticancer vector.
Cancer Res
1997
;
57
:
4537
–44.
2
Zhao M, Yang M, Ma H, et al. Targeted therapy with a Salmonella typhimurium leucine-arginine auxotroph cures orthotopic human breast tumors in nude mice.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
7647
–52.
3
Zhao M, Yang M, Li XM, et al. Tumor-targeting bacterial therapy with amino acid auxotrophs of GFP-expressing Salmonella typhimurium.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
755
–60.
4
Zhao M, Geller J, Ma H, Yang M, Penman S, and Hoffman RM. Monotherapy with a tumor-targeting mutant of Salmonella typhimurium cures orthotopic metastatic mouse models of human prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:10170–4.
5
Nishikawa H, Sato E, Briones G, et al. In vivo antigen delivery by a Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion system for therapeutic cancer vaccines.
J Clin Invest
2006
;
116
:
1946
–54.
6
Panthel K, Meinel KM, Sevil Domenech VE, et al. Prophylactic anti-tumor immunity against a murine fibrosarcoma triggered by the Salmonella type III secretion system.
Microbes Infect
2006
;
8
:
2539
–46.
7
Thamm DH, Kurzman ID, King I, et al. Systemic administration of an attenuated, tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium to dogs with spontaneous neoplasia: phase I evaluation.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
4827
–34.
8
Forbes NS, Munn LL, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Sparse initial entrapment of systemically injected Salmonella typhimurium leads to heterogeneous accumulation within tumors.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
5188
–93.
9
Toso JF, Gill VJ, Hwu P, et al. Phase I study of the intravenous administration of attenuated Salmonella typhimurium to patients with metastatic melanoma.
J Clin Oncol
2002
;
20
:
142
–52.
10
Avogadri F, Martinoli C, Petrovska L, et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on killing of Salmonella-infected tumor cells.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
3920
–7.
11
Clairmont C, Lee KC, Pike J, et al. Biodistribution and genetic stability of the novel antitumor agent VNP20009, a genetically modified strain of Salmonella typhimurium.
J Infect Dis
2000
;
181
:
1996
–2002.
12
Raghunand N, Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Microenvironmental and cellular consequences of altered blood flow in tumours.
Br J Radiol
2003
;
76
:
S11
–22.
13
Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review.
Cancer Res
1989
;
49
:
6449
–65.
14
Mengesha A, Dubois L, Lambin P, et al. Development of a flexible and potent hypoxia-inducible promoter for tumor-targeted gene expression in attenuated salmonella.
Cancer Biol Ther
2006
;
5
:
1120
–8.
15
Valdivia RH, Falkow S. Fluorescence-based isolation of bacterial genes expressed within host cells.
Science
1997
;
277
:
2007
–11.
16
Bumann D. Examination of Salmonella gene expression in an infected mammalian host using the green fluorescent protein and two-colour flow cytometry.
Mol Microbiol
2002
;
43
:
1269
–83.
17
McClelland M, Sanderson KE, Spieth J, et al. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2.
Nature
2001
;
413
:
852
–6.
18
Ohl ME, Miller SI. Salmonella: a model for bacterial pathogenesis.
Annu Rev Med
2001
;
52
:
259
–74.
19
Reppas NB, Wade JT, Church GM, Struhl K. The transition between transcriptional initiation and elongation in E. coli is highly variable and often rate limiting.
Mol Cell
2006
;
24
:
747
–57.
20
Grainger DC, Hurd D, Harrison M, Holdstock J, Busby SJ. Studies of the distribution of Escherichia coli cAMP-receptor protein and RNA polymerase along the E. coli chromosome.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
17693
–8.
21
Wade JT, Roa DC, Grainger DC, et al. Extensive functional overlap between sigma factors in Escherichia coli.
Nat Struct Mol Biol
2006
;
13
:
806
–14.
22
Tutukina MN, Shavkunov KS, Masulis IS, Ozoline ON. Intragenic promotor-like sites in the genome of Escherichia coli discovery and functional implication.
J Bioinform Comput Biol
2007
;
5
:
549
–60.
23
Iuchi S, Weiner L. Cellular and molecular physiology of Escherichia coli in the adaptation to aerobic environments.
J Biochem
1996
;
120
:
1055
–63.
24
Jennings MP, Beacham IR. Co-dependent positive regulation of the ansB promoter of Escherichia coli by CRP and the FNR protein: a molecular analysis.
Mol Microbiol
1993
;
9
:
155
–64.
25
Jennings MP, Scott SP, Beacham IR. Regulation of the ansB gene of Salmonella enterica.
Mol Microbiol
1993
;
9
:
165
–72.
26
Scott S, Busby S, Beacham I. Transcriptional co-activation at the ansB promoters: involvement of the activating regions of CRP and FNR when bound in tandem.
Mol Microbiol
1995
;
18
:
521
–31.
27
Sawers G, Suppmann B. Anaerobic induction of pyruvate formate-lyase gene expression is mediated by the ArcA and FNR proteins.
J Bacteriol
1992
;
174
:
3474
–8.
28
Knappe J, Sawers G. A radical-chemical route to acetyl-CoA: the anaerobically induced pyruvate formate-lyase system of Escherichia coli.
FEMS Microbiol Rev
1990
;
6
:
383
–98.
29
Williams AW, Yamaguchi S, Togashi F, Aizawa SI, Kawagishi I, Macnab RM. Mutations in fliK and flhB affecting flagellar hook and filament assembly in Salmonella typhimurium.
J Bacteriol
1996
;
178
:
2960
–70.
30
Loessner H, Endmann A, Leschner S, et al. Remote control of tumour-targeted Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by the use of l-arabinose as inducer of bacterial gene expression in vivo.
Cell Microbiol
2007
;
9
:
1529
–37.
31
Royo JL, Becker PD, Camacho EM, et al. In vivo gene regulation in Salmonella spp. by a salicylate-dependent control circuit.
Nat Methods
2007
;
4
:
937
–42.

Supplementary data