The threonine-to-methionine substitution at amino acid position 790 (T790M) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene has been reported in progressing lesions after gefitinib treatment in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that causes sensitive tumors to become resistant to gefitinib. Alternatively, the EGFR T790M mutation might be present in small fractions of tumor cells before drug treatment, and the tumor cells harboring the T790M mutation might be enriched during the proliferation after drug treatment. We developed a mutant-enriched PCR assay to detect small fractions of cells with T790M mutation and used this technique to detect mutations in 280 NSCLCs, including gefitinib-treated 95 cases. Although the direct sequencing detected only 1 T790M mutant case, the mutant-enriched PCR (confirmed to enrich one mutant out of 1 × 103 wild-type alleles) detected 9 additional cases among 280 cases. As linkage to clinicopathologic factors, the T790M mutation showed no bias for sex, smoking status, or histology but was significantly more frequent in advanced tumors (9 of 111 cases) than in early-stage tumors (1 of 169 cases; P = 0.0013). Among gefitinib-treated cases, gefitinib-sensitive mutations were found in 30 cases. The T790M mutation was present in 3 of 7 no-responders with the gefitinib-sensitive mutation and was not present in 19 responders (P = 0.014). Our results indicate that the T790M mutation is sometimes present in a minor population of tumor cells during the development of NSCLC and suggest that the detection of small fractions of T790M mutant alleles may be useful for predicting gefitinib resistance of NSCLCs with sensitive EGFR mutations. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(16): 7854-8)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is highly expressed in epithelial tumors, including lung cancers (1), and its intracellular signaling cascade leads to a multitude of effects, including cell proliferation, cell differentiation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and antiapoptosis (2). EGFR mutations, predominantly in exons 19 and 21, have been found in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been reported to be related to the responsiveness of tumors to gefitinib (35), although some controversial findings have been reported (6, 7). In addition, recent studies have reported the appearance of a threonine-to-methionine substitution at amino acid position 790 (T790M) in EGFR in tumors that acquire resistance to gefitinib after gefitinib treatment (8, 9). Previous reports on T790M showed that this amino acid substitution was due to a C-to-T base pair change at the second letter of codon790 of EGFR (811). The introduction of vectors carrying T790M to cells also caused gefitinib resistance, indicating that T790M causes sensitive tumors to become resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI; refs. 8, 9). In these reports, the T790M mutation was not found in tumors before treatment but in progressing lesions. Our results also suggested that de novo T790M mutation was rarely detected in NSCLC by direct sequencing (2 of 397 cases) that can only detect the mutation being present in a relativity major clone of tumors. However, the T790M mutation might exist in a small fraction of tumor cells before drug treatment, and the tumor cells harboring this mutation might be enriched over time during treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib (9).

To detect a small fraction of mutant alleles among a large amount of wild-type alleles in clinical samples, a sensitive assay, rather than direct DNA sequencing, is essential. Mutant-enriched PCR is a highly specific and sensitive technique that can detect one copy of mutant allele among as many as 103 to 104 copies of the wild-type alleles (12). The use of this assay has been proven using various kinds of clinical specimens, including biopsy and pleural fluid specimens (13), and we recently applied this assay to detect the EGFR exon 19 deletions and the L858R mutation. Thus, the establishment of a mutant-enriched PCR assay to detect a small fraction of T790M mutant alleles would be useful for detecting the presence of the T790M mutation in tumors as a minor clone. Furthermore, the effect on gefitinib responsiveness caused by a minor fraction with the T790M mutation might be of clinical importance.

In this study, we examined the presence of the EGFR T790M mutation in NSCLC using highly sensitive assay and determined the presence of any correlations between the mutation status and clinicopathologic factors, including the gefitinib effect on treated cases.

Construction of plasmids containing EGFR exon 20 alleles. pCR2.1-TOPO plasmids containing EGFR exon 20 wild-type or exon 20 T790M mutant-type, derived from human primary lung cancer and nonmalignant lung tissue, were used to validate the sensitivity of mutant-enriched PCR assay for the T790M EGFR mutation. The sequences of each plasmid were confirmed by sequencing.

Mutant-enriched PCR analysis for T790M of EGFR mutation in exon 20. A mutant-enriched PCR assay is a two-step PCR with intermittent restriction digestion to eliminate wild-type genes selectively, thus enriching the mutated genes (12). The sequences of the primers for PCR are as follows: ex20-S1, 5′-ACTGACGTGCCTCTCCCTCC-3′ (forward); ex20-S2, 5′-CCTCCAGGAAGCCTACGTGA-3′ (forward); and ex20-AS1, 5′-CGAAGGGCATGAGCCGC-3′ (reverse). The ex20-AS1 primer harbors one mismatched site (T to C) to introduce a new CGCG sequence for PCR amplification of wild-type alleles. The restriction enzyme BstUI was used to digest the CGCG sequence in the amplicon of the wild-type. In contrast, T790M mutant alleles were not digested because of the base substitution of C-to-T nucleotide at first base of CGCG, resulting in the enrichment of mutant alleles. In this assay, the first round of amplification was done for 30 cycles (20 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60°C, 20 seconds at 72°C) using 10 to 50 ng of sample DNA, 150 μmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 2 pmol of each primer, and 0.25 unit of HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) using ex20-S1 and ex20-AS1 primers. After digestion using BstUI, the second-round PCR was done using ex20-S2 and ex20-AS1 primers (Fig. 1). The nucleotide of second letter of EGFR codon 790 was examined by single-base primer extension reaction and by direct sequencing to confirm results independently.

Single-base primer extension reaction. A single-base primer extension reaction was done using an ABI Prism SNaPshot Multiplex kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The reaction mix contained 3 μL of second-round PCR product (as the template), 5 μL of SNaPshot Ready Reaction Premix, and the following primers: ex20-S3 (5′-TCCACCGTGCAGCTCATCA-3′) or ex20-AS1 (Fig. 1). The products were separated and detected by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The data were analyzed using GeneMapper Software version 3.7 (Applied Biosystems).

Clinical samples, DNA extraction, and EGFR and KRAS sequencing. We examined 280 specimens from clinical samples of NSCLC patients. The patient characteristics are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Two-hundred and eighty specimens consisted of 233 cases obtained by surgical resection, 26 cases of lung biopsies, 1 of lymph node biopsy, and 20 of pleural fluid from patients. Ninety-five cases were treated with gefitinib, and their response to drug was recorded.5

5

s. Ichihara et al., submitted for publication.

The permission of the Institutional Review Board and informed consent from each patient were obtained. Clinicopathologic staging was determined according to International Union Against Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification of malignant tumors (14). Tumor response was assessed as complete response, partial response, no change, or progressive disease according to the WHO criteria (15). DNAs of clinical samples were obtained from frozen specimens, paraffin-embedded specimens, and pleural fluid as mentioned in our previous report (13). As nonmalignant samples, 53 peripheral lung tissue specimen corresponding tumors, including 3 cases with the T790M mutation, were obtained. The concentration of DNA was quantified using NanoDrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). EGFR mutations in exons 18 to 21 and KRAS mutations in exon 2 were examined using direct sequencing as described previously (16). DNA sequencing was done using Applied Biosystems Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing method (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA) with ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) in Central Research Laboratory, Okayama University Medical School (Okayama, Japan).

Statistical analyses. The differences of significance among categorized groups were compared using Fisher's exact test. The statistical test was two sided, and the probability value <0.05 was defined as being statistically significant.

Sensitivity of a mutant-enriched PCR for EGFR T790M mutation. To evaluate the sensitivity of the mutant-enriched PCR assay, we used serially diluted plasmid DNAs containing EGFR mutant and wild-type alleles. The mutant-enriched PCR assay for the EGFR T790M mutation was able to detect one copy of mutant allele in the presence of 1 × 103 copies of wild-type alleles (data not shown).

Direct sequencing and mutant-enriched PCR assay for T790M mutation.EGFR mutations were found at exon 18 in 7 cases (1 of V715A, 4 of G719A, 1 of G719S, and 1 of G721D), at exon 19 in 45 cases (44 cases of in-frame deletion and 1 D761Y mutation), at exon 20 in 3 cases (1 T790M mutation and 2 insertions), and at exon 21 in 43 cases (L858R mutation) out of a total 280 cases of NSCLCs that were examined by direct sequencing. These mutations included three cases that harbored double mutation: T790M plus L858R, D761Y plus L858R, and exon 20 insertion plus L858R. KRAS mutations were found in 19 cases. This mutational spectrum was consistent with previous reports, suggesting the absence of a selection bias in the present cohort.

We examined the presence of the EGFR T790M mutation in the same 280 specimens using the mutant-enriched PCR assay. The representative examples of the mutant-enriched PCR assay followed by single-base primer extension reaction and direct sequencing are shown in Fig. 2. The T790M mutation was detected in only 1 (0.36%) of 280 cases by direct sequencing as we previously reported (10). On the other hand, the mutant-enriched PCR assay detected 9 (3.2%) additional cases with T790M mutations among the 280 cases (Table 2). No mutations were found in 53 corresponding nonmalignant peripheral lung tissues, including nonmalignant lung tissues from the patients with three cases of T790M-positive tumors. We confirmed our results by doing the mutant-enriched PCR assay in triplicate. All the mutant cases showed a C-to-T change despite the possibility of another nucleotide change if a random PCR error had occurred. These findings strongly suggest that the mutant-enriched PCR assay was highly specific.

The frequency and state of EGFR T790M mutation and clinicopathologic factors. The clinicopathologic factors of T790M mutant cases are shown in Table 2. T790M mutations were found in four cases that also harbored an exon 19 deletion or an L858R mutation, in two cases with KRAS mutations, and in four cases without any EGFR or KRAS mutation at examined exons. In addition, we examined the presence of EGFR exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation as a minor clone in six EGFR wild-type cases by the mutant-enriched PCR for these alterations (13) and found no mutation. As sex or smoking status, there were no significant differences for the rate of T790M mutation in sex [8 (4.2%) of 191 men and 2 (2.2%) of 89 women] or in smoking status [8 (4.3%) of 185 ever smoker and 2 (2.1%) of 95 never smoker]. The T790M mutation was present in 6 (2.9%) of 205 adenocarcinomas, 2 (3.4%) of 59 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 (11.1%) of 9 adenosquamous carcinomas, 1 (16.7%) of 6 large cell carcinomas, and none of 1 spindle carcinoma, indicating no predominant histology for the T790M mutation. About disease stage, no T790M-positive case was present in 137 cases of stage I, 1 (3.1%) in 32 stage II, 5 (9.8%) in 51 stage III, 4 (7.7%) in 52 stage IV, and none in 8 recurrent disease cases. The T790M mutation was preferentially present in advanced cases [stages III and IV and recurrent disease; 9 (8.1%) of 111 cases] compared with early cases [stages I and II; 1 (0.59%) of 169 cases; P = 0.0013]. By contrast, there was no difference in single exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation between advanced cases [28 (25.2%) of 111 cases] and early cases [58 (34.3%) of 169 cases].

Ninety-five cases were treated with gefitinib, and tumor responsiveness was found in 23 cases. Gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation was present in 19 cases and no EGFR mutations in 4 cases. Among 10 cases harboring the T790M mutation, 9 cases were treated with gefitinib. Two patients showed progressive disease, 6 no change, and 1 not evaluable, indicating that there was no-responder even in cases harboring a minor population of the T790M mutation (Table 2). Gefitinib-sensitive mutations were found in 30 cases consisting of 7 no-responders, 19 responders, and 4 not evaluable cases. The T790M mutation was found in 3 of 7 no-responders and was not found in 19 responders with gefitinib-sensitive mutations, indicating that the T790M mutation in cases with gefitinib-sensitive mutation was significantly frequent in gefitinib-resistant cases (P = 0.014). Of note, two of these three T790M mutant cases were not detected by direct sequencing, showing that the cells harboring the T790M mutation represented a minor population.

We found the presence of the EGFR T790M mutation in a minor tumor population in 3.6% of the NSCLCs examined in this study. In contrast, the majority of the exon 19 deletions and the L858R mutation were found in major populations of the tumor cells as reported in our previous study (13). These EGFR mutations were identified by direct sequencing and mutant-enriched PCR assays at almost equal frequency (13). Although EGFR exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations cause the constitutive activation of EGFR, the introduction of the EGFR T790M mutation into cells does not substantially alter the EGFR tyrosine kinase activity or the status of EGFR signal transduction cascade molecules as shown using standard cell-based assays in vitro (8, 9, 17). Bell et al. (17) reported that the presence of a germ-line EGFR T790M mutation in the patients with lung cancer is associated with a relatively late onset of familial NSCLC, suggesting that the T790M mutation may possess the potential attenuated function for oncogenesis. These findings suggest that the EGFR T790M mutation does not play a major causative or proliferative role in tumorigenesis and that the selective proliferation of cells harboring a T790M mutation does not normally occur. Thus, the T790M mutation tends to be present as a minor clone if the T790M mutation occurs late during carcinogenesis, when tumor cells exhibit more genomic instability than at earlier stages. Indeed, the rate of T790M mutation is significantly higher in advanced tumors than in early-stage tumors, but no difference was present in drug-sensitizing mutations between disease stages. These facts also suggest that the T790M mutation was just “bystander” mutations being not involved in tumor initiation during the development of NSCLC initiated by some other mechanisms, such as an EGFR-activating mutation or a KRAS mutation, which was also seen in six of our cases. Other mechanisms may have been responsible for carcinogenesis in our other four cases with wild-type of EGFR and KRAS.

In gefitinib-treated cases, gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutant cases harboring T790M minor clone showed no response to gefitinib. Similarly, a minor proportion of cells harboring an imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutation was reported in the patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia; a major proportion of mutant cells was later found when resistance became apparent (18). Taking together our results, we hypothesized that gefitinib treatment may cause the selection of T790M mutant cells and that even a small fraction of T790M-positive tumor cells at the beginning of treatment could lead to clinical gefitinib resistance as a result of the selective proliferation of T790M mutant cells (Fig. 3). Recent studies indicate that several drugs can overcome the resistance caused by the T790M mutation, suggesting that the development of second-generation EGFR inhibitors is imminent (19). Thus, the detection of a minor T790M-positive clone may be useful not only for predicting gefitinib resistance but also for effectively preventing the emergence of resistance through the appropriate usage of next-generation EGFR inhibitors.

We reported that the exon 20 insertion mutations showed no bias for sex or smoking status (20), which is different from exon 19 deletions and the L858R mutation that are frequently present in women and never smokers. It is interesting that the T790M mutation is also an alteration in exon 20 and shows a similar association in sex and smoking status to exon 20 insertions. Of note, although 3.6% of the NSCLCs harbored the T790M mutation in our series, as shown using the mutant-enriched PCR assay described above, a more sensitive assay might reveal an even higher percentage. Thus, the actual frequency at which the T790M mutation appears as a minor clone in NSCLC is unknown.

In conclusion, we developed a mutant-enriched PCR assay to detect the EGFR T790M mutation and found that the T790M mutation is sometimes present as a minor population in tumor cells and can cause the emergence of resistance after gefitinib administration. The detection of a small fraction of T790M-positive tumor cells may be useful for predicting the clinical course of the gefitinib-treated NSCLC patients and to establish EGFR-targeted therapy using new EGFR inhibitors.

Grant support: Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture, and Technology of Japan Scientific Research grant-in-aid 18790993 (S. Toyooka).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Makiko Tabata (Department of Cancer and Thoracic Surgery, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan) and Yukinari Isomoto (Central Research Laboratory, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University) for excellent technical support.

1
Rusch V, Baselga J, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. Differential expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and its ligands in primary non-small cell lung cancers and adjacent benign lung.
Cancer Res
1993
;
53
:
2379
–85.
2
Ciardiello F, De Vita F, Orditura M, Tortora G. The role of EGFR inhibitors in nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Curr Opin Oncol
2004
;
16
:
130
–5.
3
Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.
N Engl J Med
2004
;
350
:
2129
–39.
4
Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.
Science
2004
;
304
:
1497
–500.
5
Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2004
;
101
:
13306
–11.
6
Cappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2005
;
97
:
643
–55.
7
Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, et al. Erlotinib in lung cancer—molecular and clinical predictors of outcome.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
353
:
133
–44.
8
Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, et al. EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
352
:
786
–92.
9
Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, et al. Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain.
PLoS Med
2005
;
2
:
e73
.
10
Toyooka S, Kiura K, Mitsudomi T. EGFR mutation and response of lung cancer to gefitinib.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
352
:
2136
; author reply 2136.
11
Shih JY, Gow CH, Yang PC. EGFR mutation conferring primary resistance to gefitinib in non-small-cell lung cancer.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
353
:
207
–8.
12
Kahn SM, Jiang W, Culbertson TA, et al. Rapid and sensitive nonradioactive detection of mutant K-ras genes via ‘enriched’ PCR amplification.
Oncogene
1991
;
6
:
1079
–83.
13
Asano H, Toyooka S, Tokumo M, et al. Detection of EGFR gene mutation in lung cancer by mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction assay.
Clin Cancer Res
2006
;
12
:
43
–8.
14
Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.
15
Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment.
Cancer
1981
;
47
:
207
–14.
16
Tokumo M, Toyooka S, Kiura K, et al. The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and clinicopathologic features in non-small cell lung cancers.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
1167
–73.
17
Bell DW, Gore I, Okimoto RA, et al. Inherited susceptibility to lung cancer may be associated with the T790M drug resistance mutation in EGFR.
Nat Genet
2005
;
37
:
1315
–6.
18
Roche-Lestienne C, Lai JL, Darre S, Facon T, Preudhomme C. A mutation conferring resistance to imatinib at the time of diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia.
N Engl J Med
2003
;
348
:
2265
–6.
19
Carter TA, Wodicka LM, Shah NP, et al. Inhibition of drug-resistant mutants of ABL, KIT, and EGF receptor kinases.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
11011
–6.
20
Shigematsu H, Toyooka S, Suzuki M. The need for an individual approach to lung cancer treatment.
PLoS Med
2006
;
3
:
e206
.