In this article (Cancer Prev Res 2013;6:1242–50), which was published in the November 2013 issue of Cancer Prevention Research (1), some of the values presented in Table 3 were incorrect due to a coding error in the analysis. The corrected Table 3 and the corresponding Results section with the correct values are below.

Table 3.

HPV16 and HPV18 antibody stability between months 24, 36, and 48 by number of doses

1-dose2-doses(0/1)2-doses(0/6)3-dosesP-value
24–48 months n (%) 
HPV16a      
Stablec 68 (87.18) 128 (91.43) 43 (82.69) 106 (88.33) 0.30 
Decreasec 10 (12.82) 12 (8.57) 9 (17.31) 14 (11.67)  
HPV18b      
Stable 71 (91.03) 128 (91.42) 43 (82.69) 103 (85.83) 0.24 
Decrease 7 (8.97) 12 (8.57) 9 (17.31) 17 (14.17)  
36–48 months n (%) 
HPV16      
Stable decrease 74 (94.87) 136 (97.14) 51 (98.08) 117 (97.50) 0.69 
 4 (5.13) 4 (2.86) 1 (1.92) 3 (2.50)  
HPV18      
Stable 72 (92.31) 134 (95.71) 51 (98.08) 118 (98.33) 0.15 
Decrease 6 (7.69) 6 (4.29) 1 (1.92) 2 (1.67)  
1-dose2-doses(0/1)2-doses(0/6)3-dosesP-value
24–48 months n (%) 
HPV16a      
Stablec 68 (87.18) 128 (91.43) 43 (82.69) 106 (88.33) 0.30 
Decreasec 10 (12.82) 12 (8.57) 9 (17.31) 14 (11.67)  
HPV18b      
Stable 71 (91.03) 128 (91.42) 43 (82.69) 103 (85.83) 0.24 
Decrease 7 (8.97) 12 (8.57) 9 (17.31) 17 (14.17)  
36–48 months n (%) 
HPV16      
Stable decrease 74 (94.87) 136 (97.14) 51 (98.08) 117 (97.50) 0.69 
 4 (5.13) 4 (2.86) 1 (1.92) 3 (2.50)  
HPV18      
Stable 72 (92.31) 134 (95.71) 51 (98.08) 118 (98.33) 0.15 
Decrease 6 (7.69) 6 (4.29) 1 (1.92) 2 (1.67)  

aHPV16 Spearman's rank correlation coefficient at 24- and 48-month visits was 0.88 (P < 0.0001).

bHPV18 Spearman's rank correlation coefficient at 24- and 48-month visits was 0.90 (P < 0.0001).

cStable antibodies defined as levels that did not decline by 2-fold or more; a decrease in antibodies as those that declined 2-fold or more.

HPV16 and HPV18 antibody durability between 24 to 48 and 36 to 48 months is shown in Table 3. By our definition of less than a 2-fold change, stability between 24 to 48 and 36 to 48 months was high in all dose groups (stability24–48 months in the one dose group: HPV16 = 87%; HPV18 = 91%; stability36–48 months in the one dose group: HPV16 = 95%; HPV18 = 92%; all P values > 0.05 compared with the other dose groups) and only a small proportion of women had a decline in antibody levels observed between 24 to 48 and 36 to 48 months regardless of number of doses.

In addition, the maximum values for HPV16, 3-dose, 90th percentiles were mistakenly presented in Table 1. The correct 90th percentiles are (in the order they appear in the table) below.

Enrollment: 47.32

1: 2,349.73

6: 2,409.74

12: 6,683.96

24: 2,978.55

36: 2,573.65

48: 1,808.36

Finally, in the footnote for Table 4, the cutoff for HPV16 neutralization was incorrect. The correct cutoff for HPV16 neutralization is 25.1.

The authors regret the errors.

1.
Safaeian
M
,
Porras
C
,
Pan
Y
,
Kreimer
A
,
Schiller
JT
,
Gonzalez
P
, et al
Durable antibody responses following one dose of the bivalent human papillomavirus L1 virus-like particle vaccine in the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial
.
Cancer Prev Res
2013
;
6
:
1242
50
.