The Wnt pathway is a promising therapeutic and preventive target in various human cancers. The transcriptional complex of β-catenin–T-cell factor (Tcf), a key mediator of canonical Wnt signaling, has been implicated in human colon cancer development. Current treatment of colon cancer depends on traditional cytotoxic agents with limited effects. Therefore, the identification of natural compounds that can disrupt the β-catenin–TcF complex to suppress cancer cell growth with fewer adverse side effects is needed. To identify compounds that inhibit the association between β-catenin and Tcf, we used computer docking to screen a natural compound library. Esculetin, also known as 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin, is a derivative of coumarin and was identified as a potential small-molecule inhibitor of the Wnt–β-catenin pathway. We then evaluated the effect of esculetin on the growth of various human colon cancer cell lines and its effect on Wnt–β-catenin signaling in cells and in an embryonic model. Esculetin disrupted the formation of the β-catenin–Tcf complex through direct binding with the Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 residues of β-catenin in colon cancer cells. In addition, esculetin effectively decreased viability and inhibited anchorage-independent growth of colon cancer cells. Esculetin potently antagonized the cellular effects of β-catenin–dependent activity, and in vivo treatment with esculetin suppressed tumor growth in a colon cancer xenograft mouse model. Our data indicate that the interaction between esculetin and β-catenin inhibits the formation of the β-catenin–Tcf complex, which could contribute to esculetin's positive therapeutic and preventive effects against colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Prev Res; 6(12); 1356–64. ©2013 AACR.

The Wnt family of secreted glycoproteins is highly conserved and regulates many biologic processes including development and disease (1–6). In the embryonic development process, appropriate activation of Wnt signaling regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, and determination of cell fate (7–11). Inappropriate activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is implicated in human diseases, including various human cancers (1, 2, 6, 12–14). In particular, deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway is a critical event in colon carcinoma tumorigenesis (15–18). Thus, the Wnt signaling pathway is considered a key therapeutic and preventive target for cancer (19, 20).

In the absence of active Wnt signaling, the β-catenin destruction complex, which is composed of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and Axin, catalyzes the phosphorylation of β-catenin leading to its proteosomal degradation. Activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway through the formation of a ligand-activated receptor complex inhibited the formation of the β-catenin destruction complex, which allows β-catenin to accumulate and subsequently translocate to the nucleus. Nuclear β-catenin directly binds with the T-cell factor (Tcf)/lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) family, and these interactions stimulate transcription of Wnt target genes, whose promoters contain binding sites of the Tcf-transcription factor (3, 21–23).

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second most frequent cancer reported in females (24). In the majority of colon cancers, the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway is constitutively active (15–18). Approximately 90% of colon cancers exhibit mutation of the APC or Axin genes, which leads to a disruption of the β-catenin destruction complex and accumulation of β-catenin. Multiple mutations lead to the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and subsequent formation of a nuclear β-catenin–Tcf transcription complex (17, 25, 26). This leads to the inappropriate activation of its target genes, including c-myc (27) and cyclin D1 (28, 29), and also plays an essential role in proliferation of colon cancer cells. Therefore, disrupting the β-catenin–Tcf complex and inhibiting the nuclear function of β-catenin is considered to be therapeutically beneficial and could be useful for preventing colon cancer.

Here, we performed virtual structure-based screening of a natural product compound library using the crystal structure of the β-catenin–Tcf complex (PDB ID:1JPW). Esculetin (6,7-dihydroxy-2-chromenone), a derivative of coumarin that is present in many medicinal plants (30–33), was identified as a potential inhibitor of β-catenin–Tcf-mediated transcription. Esculetin exhibits many pharmacologic effects, including inhibiting lipooxygenase (34, 35) and acting as an anticoagulant (36). In addition, inhibition of cancer cell growth by esculetin has been reported previously (37–39). Although esculetin has shown antiproliferative effects in cancer cells, the molecular mechanism by which this occurs has not been investigated carefully. In the present study, we demonstrated that esculetin exhibits inhibitory effects against human colon cancer cells by directly targeting β-catenin, leading to the disruption of the β-catenin–Tcf complex. These results suggested that esculetin has a significant therapeutic and preventive potential against human colon cancer.

Reagents

Esculetin and anti-β-actin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. McCoy's 5A and RPMI1640 medium were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Basal Medium Eagle (BME), gentamicin, penicillin/streptomycin, and l-glutamine were obtained from Invitrogen. [γ-32P]-ATP and the chemiluminescence detection kit were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. CNBr-Sepharose 4B beads were purchased from GE Healthcare. The MTS solution was purchased from Promega. Antibodies against β-catenin and cyclin D1 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies against c-Myc and Tcf4 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.

Plasmid constructs

The Myc-tagged β-catenin TM mutant, in which Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 was changed to Glu, Val, Glu, and Ala, respectively, was generated using the QuickChange II site directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).

Cell culture

All cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and were cytogenetically tested and authenticated before the cells were frozen. Each vial of frozen cells was thawed and maintained in culture for a maximum of 8 weeks. HCT116 human colon cancer cells were cultured in McCoY's 5A medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Atlanta Biologicals) and HCT15 and DLD-1 human colon cancer cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS.

Cell viability assay

Cells were seeded (2 × 103 cells per well) in 96-well plates and incubated for 12 hours and then treated with different doses of esculetin. After incubation for 72 hours, 20 μL of Cell Titer96 Aqueous One Solution (Promega) were added and cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Absorbance was measured at 492 nm.

Preparation of esculetin-Sepharose 4B beads

To activate Sepharose 4B beads, esculetin and Sepharose 4B powder (0.3 g) were suspended in 1 mmol/L HCl. Then the coupled solution (0.1 mol/L NaHCO3, pH 8.3 and 0.5 mol/L NaCl) was added and rotated overnight at 4°C. The mixture was washed with coupling buffer, and transferred to 0.1 mol/L Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.3). The excess of uncoupled esculetin was removed by washing with 0.1 mol/L acetate buffer (pH 4.0) and 0.1 mol/L Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.5 mol/L NaCl.

Cell-based pull-down assay

Proteins (500 μg) of HCT116, HCT15, and DLD-1 cells extracted with reaction buffer were mixed with Sepharose 4B beads (as a negative control) or esculetin-Sepharose 4B beads (100 μL) in reaction buffer [50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.01% Nonidet P-40, 2 mg/mL BSA, 0.2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), and 1× protease inhibitor mixture]. After incubation with gentle rocking overnight at 4°C, the beads were washed 5 times with buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L DTT, 0.01% Nonidet P-40, and 0.02 mmol/L PMSF) and binding was visualized by Western blotting.

Anchorage-independent cell growth

In brief, cells (8 × 103 per well) suspended in BME supplemented with 10% FBS were added to 0.3% agar with different doses of esculetin in a top layer over a base layer of 0.6% agar. The cultures were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 2 weeks and then colonies were counted under a microscope using the Image-Pro Plus Software version 4 program (Media Cybernetics).

Western blot analysis

Cell lysates were prepared with lysis buffer (10 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L DTT, 0.1 mmol/L PMSF, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail tablet). The protein concentration was measured using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Biotechnology). A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce Biotechnology) was used and the signal was detected with chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham).

Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells using the TRizol reagent (Tel-Test Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized using the Superscript pre-amplification system (Life Technologies Inc.). PCR reactions were performed using the following conditions: 94°C for 5 minutes and 25 to -28 amplification cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, the appropriate annealing temperature for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR primers were GAPDH (forward: 5′-CTCAGACACCATGGGGAAGGT-3′) and reverse: 5′-TGATCTTGAGGCTGTTGTCATA-3′); c-myc (forward: 5′-TGTCAAGAGGCGAACACACAACGTC-3′ and reverse: 5′- ATCTTTCAGTCTCAAGACTCAGCCA-3′); and cyclin D1 (forward: CCTGTCCTACTACCGCCTCA and reverse: 5′- TCCTCCTCTTCCTCCTCCTC-3′).

Immunoprecipitation assay

HCT116 and HCT15 cells were treated with the indicated concentration of esculetin for 24 hours and then disrupted with lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, pH 8, 250 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and immunoprecipitations were performed by incubating overnight with anti-β-catenin. Protein A/G Plus Agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added and the solution was incubated for 3 hours at 4°C. Unbound proteins were removed by washing 4 times with lysis buffer. Bound proteins were harvested by boiling in sample buffer, and resolved by electrophoresis in 8% SDSPAGE. β-catenin and Tcf4 proteins were visualized using a chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham).

Transfection and luciferase reporter gene assay

Transient transfection was performed using jetPEI (VWR), and assays to detect firefly luciferase and Renilla activities were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates and cotransfected with 50 ng of the Renilla luciferase internal control gene and 100 ng of the TOP-flash luciferase reporter construct containing three tandem Tcf consensus binding sites upstream of luciferase cDNA, or the FOP-flash luciferase reporter construct, a plasmid with mutated Tcf binding sites. After 12 hours of transfection, cells were incubated with the indicated concentration of esculetin for another 24 hours. Luciferase and Renilla activities were measured using substrates included in the reporter assay system (Promega). The luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla activity.

Xenopus experiment

Xenopus laevis embryos were obtained by artificial fertilization. Vitelline membranes were removed by immersing embryos in a 2% cysteine solution (pH 8). Embryos were injected with 250 pg of β-catenin mRNA alone or together with the indicated concentration of esculetin and then cultured to stage 40 in 67% Leibovitzs L-15 medium (Invitrogen) containing BSA (1 mg/mL), 7 mmol/L Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), and gentamicin (50 μg/mL). Xenopus embryos at stage 40 do not have vertebrae, but have the notochord, which is a precursor of the backbone.

Xenograft studies in nude mice

Female athymic nude mice (6- to 7-week old) were purchased from Central Lab Animal Inc. (Seoul, Korea) and maintained under “specific pathogen-free” conditions on the basis of the guidelines established by the University of Seoul National University (Seoul, Korea) Institutional Animal care and Use Committee (SNU120106-4). Mice were divided into four groups: (i) untreated vehicle group (n = 10); (ii) 20 mg esculetin per kilogram of body weight (n = 10); (iii) 100 mg esculetin per kilogram of body weight (n = 10); (iv) no cells and 100 mg esculetin per kilogram of body weight (n = 10). HCT116 cells (2.5 × 106 cells/100 μL) suspended in serum-free McCoy 5A medium were injected subcutaneously in the flank of each animal. Esculetin or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally 3 times per week for 11 days. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; 4%) and polyethylene glycol (40%) were diluted with PBS buffer and used as the vehicle. At the end of the experiment, mice were sacrificed, and tumors were extracted. Tumor volume was calculated from measurements of two diameters of the individual tumor base using the following formula: tumor volume (mm3) = (length × width × height × 0.52).

Immunohistochemical staining

For histopathologic examination, paraffin sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 (Lab Vision Corporation), cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or c-Myc (Novous Biologicals) was performed using the indirect avidin–biotin-enhanced horseradish peroxidase method (Vector Laboratories). For quantitation, each slide was scanned to obtain an overall impression of the staining patterns and 10 representative ×200 power (Ki-67 and cyclin D1) or ×400 (c-Myc) photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera, avoiding gross necrotic areas. The positively stained cancer epithelial cells within each photomicrograph were counted. Counting the total number of cancer cells was aided with the Image Pro+ image-processing program. The Ki-67 and cyclin D1 indices were based on the counting of approximately 7,000 total cells per tumor slide.

Virtual screening

To find potential inhibitors of β-catenin, a molecular docking method was developed using the Glide module from Schrödinger Suite 2011 (40, 41) and used to perform the virtual screening. A crystal structure of a human Tcf-4–β-catenin complex (PDB ID:1JPW; refs. 42, 43) was downloaded from the PDB Bank (44) for virtual screening studies. This is an X-ray diffraction structure with a resolution of 2.5 Å. Waters, metals, and Tcf-4 were stripped from the structure, and then hydrogens and atom charges are added to the structure using the Protein Preparation Wizard in Schrödinger suite 2011 with the standard procedure outlined. Two pockets were generated respectively within a 30-Å3 grid based on the binding site of Tcf-4 with β-catenin. One pocket was centered with Lys312 and the other with Lys435. The 2-D TCMD (Traditional Chinese Medicine Databse) structure database, which consists of approximately 9,000 structures of natural products (45), was first converted to a three-dimensional (3D) structure database using the LigPrep module of the Schrödinger Suite of software and then used for virtual screening. High-throughput virtual screening (HTVS) docking is usually first performed because it is intended for the rapid screening of large numbers of ligands followed by standard and extra precision (SP and XP) docking.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means ± SD of triplicate samples from at least three independent experiments. Differences between means were assessed by ANOVA, and the minimum level of significance was set at P value less than 0.05.

Computer modeling of the β-catenin and esculetin complex

To find potential inhibitors of β-catenin, we performed structure-based in silico screening using a molecular docking method as described in the Materials and Methods section. The crystal structure of β-catenin bound to the Tcf protein has been determined and two major pockets of β-catenin for binding with Tcf were identified previously (42, 43). Based on the crystal structure, we screened a small-molecule library to identify compounds that could possibly bind to the two pockets of β-catenin, sites that are critical for the binding of Tcf to β-catenin. We used in silico screening to select three top-ranked compounds and tested their effect on human colon cancer cell growth. Of the three, esculetin was the most effective (Supplementary Fig. S1). Esculetin (Fig. 1A) is a derivative of coumarin that is present in many medicinal plants (30–33). The computational prediction of the binding affinity between esculetin and β-catenin was predicted to be very good with a score of −6.75 kcal/mol. In addition, computer modeling results predicted that esculetin could directly bind to the Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 residues of β-catenin through hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1B). Therefore, we suggest that esculetin might contribute to the inhibition of the β-catenin–Tcf complex formation by directing interacting with β-catenin.

Figure 1.

Modeling of esculetin binding with β-catenin. A, chemical structure of esculetin. B, esculetin binds with β-catenin. Hydrogen bonds are formed between esculetin and β-catenin at the Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 residues of β-catenin. Images were generated with the UCSF Chimera program.

Figure 1.

Modeling of esculetin binding with β-catenin. A, chemical structure of esculetin. B, esculetin binds with β-catenin. Hydrogen bonds are formed between esculetin and β-catenin at the Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 residues of β-catenin. Images were generated with the UCSF Chimera program.

Close modal

Esculetin directly binds with β-catenin

To confirm the results of the computer docking model, we determined whether esculetin could directly bind to β-catenin. We performed pull-down assays using esculetin-conjugated Sepharose 4B beads with cell lysates of human colon cancer cells. These results showed that esculetin directly bound to β-catenin precipitated from HCT116, HCT15, and DLD1 cell lysates (Fig. 2A). In addition, molecular docking of the esculetin and β-catenin complex indicated that esculetin binds with β-catenin at Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387. In order to confirm this prediction, we generated myc-tagged wild-type β-catenin and mutant (TM) β-catenin plasmids in which Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 were replaced with Glu, Val, Glu, and Ala, respectively. Lysates from 293T cells were transfected with myc-tagged wild-type or TM β-catenin and were incubated with esculetin-conjugated Sepharose 4B beads for a pull-down assay. These results indicated that mutant (TM) β-catenin failed to bind esculetin (Fig. 2B), which supports the computer docking model of the predicted binding sites between esculetin and β-catenin.

Figure 2.

Direct binding of esculetin and β-catenin disrupts the β-catenin–Tcf complexes. A, esculetin directly binds to β-catenin. Colon cancer cell lysates were incubated with esculetin-conjugated Sepharose 4B beads (Es-sepharose) or Sepharose 4B beads alone, and then the pulled-down proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. B, Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 of β-catenin are crucial for binding with esculetin. Myc-tagged wild-type (WT) or mutant (TM) β-catenin was transfected into 293T cells. The pulled-down proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. C, esculetin dose-dependently disrupts the β-catenin–Tcf complex. Nuclear extracts derived from esculetin-treated colon cancer cells were used for an immunoprecipitation assay.

Figure 2.

Direct binding of esculetin and β-catenin disrupts the β-catenin–Tcf complexes. A, esculetin directly binds to β-catenin. Colon cancer cell lysates were incubated with esculetin-conjugated Sepharose 4B beads (Es-sepharose) or Sepharose 4B beads alone, and then the pulled-down proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. B, Lys312, Gly307, Lys345, and Asn387 of β-catenin are crucial for binding with esculetin. Myc-tagged wild-type (WT) or mutant (TM) β-catenin was transfected into 293T cells. The pulled-down proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. C, esculetin dose-dependently disrupts the β-catenin–Tcf complex. Nuclear extracts derived from esculetin-treated colon cancer cells were used for an immunoprecipitation assay.

Close modal

We then investigated whether the direct binding of esculetin with β-catenin could interrupt the association of β-catenin with Tcf4. Tcf4 in nuclear extracts of esculetin-treated HCT116 and HCT15 cells was coimmunoprecipitated with anti-β-catenin. Indeed, esculetin suppressed the association of β-catenin with Tcf4 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2C). These results suggested that esculetin might be able to attenuate the association of the β-catenin–Tcf4 transcriptional complex by directly interacting with β-catenin.

Esculetin inhibits β-catenin–Tcf transactivation

To confirm the effect of esculetin on the β-catenin–Tcf transcriptional complex in cells, we measured TOP/FOP-luciferase activity in HCT116, HCT15, and DLD1 colon cancer cells. Colon cancer cells were cotransfected with a luciferase reporter gene containing three tandem Tcf consensus binding sites (TOP) or a mutated Tcf binding site (FOP) and the Renilla-luciferase reporter gene as a normalizing transfection control. At 12 hours posttransfection, cells were treated for 24 hours with the indicated concentration of esculetin. TOP or FOP-luciferase activity was measured and normalized to Renilla-luciferase activity. Data are shown as relative values compared with untreated control. Esculetin effectively suppressed the TOP-luciferase activity in a dose-dependent manner, without significantly affecting FOP-luciferase activity (Fig. 3A). These results indicated that esculetin inhibited the β-catenin–Tcf complex signaling, which is consistent with the finding that esculetin disrupted the association of the β-catenin–Tcf transcriptional complex.

Figure 3.

Effects of esculetin on the β-catenin–Tcf pathway. A, esculetin inhibits the transcriptional activity of the β-catenin–Tcf complex in colon cancer cells. Colon cancer cells were cotransfected with reporter genes harboring the β-catenin–Tcf binding site (TOP-flash) or a mutant β-catenin–Tcf binding site (FOP-flash), respectively, and the Renilla gene. Cells were treated for 24 hours with the indicated concentration of esculetin. The luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla activity. B and C, colon cancer cells were incubated for 24 hours with the indicated concentration of esculetin. B, esculetin inhibits the expression of target proteins, c-Myc and cyclin D1, of β-catenin–Tcf in colon cancer cells. c-Myc and cyclin D1 protein levels were determined by immunoblotting. C, esculetin decreases the mRNA level of the cyclin D1 and c-myc genes. –RT indicates negative control of reverse transcription (RT). D, esculetin inhibits β-catenin–induced axis duplication of Xenopus embryos.

Figure 3.

Effects of esculetin on the β-catenin–Tcf pathway. A, esculetin inhibits the transcriptional activity of the β-catenin–Tcf complex in colon cancer cells. Colon cancer cells were cotransfected with reporter genes harboring the β-catenin–Tcf binding site (TOP-flash) or a mutant β-catenin–Tcf binding site (FOP-flash), respectively, and the Renilla gene. Cells were treated for 24 hours with the indicated concentration of esculetin. The luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla activity. B and C, colon cancer cells were incubated for 24 hours with the indicated concentration of esculetin. B, esculetin inhibits the expression of target proteins, c-Myc and cyclin D1, of β-catenin–Tcf in colon cancer cells. c-Myc and cyclin D1 protein levels were determined by immunoblotting. C, esculetin decreases the mRNA level of the cyclin D1 and c-myc genes. –RT indicates negative control of reverse transcription (RT). D, esculetin inhibits β-catenin–induced axis duplication of Xenopus embryos.

Close modal

Next, we examined the expression of c-myc and cyclin D1, which are direct target genes of the β-catenin–Tcf complex. We treated HCT116, HCT15, and DLD1 colon cancer cells with esculetin and assessed the protein abundance of c-Myc and cyclin D1. Treatment with esculetin for 24 hours substantially repressed the protein levels of c-Myc and cyclin D1, but had no effect on the levels of β-catenin or Tcf (Fig. 3B). In addition, we examined the mRNA levels of c-myc and cyclin D1 in esculetin-treated human colon cancer cells. Consistent with the protein abundance of c-Myc and cyclin D1, the mRNA level of c-myc and cyclin D1 was attenuated by esculetin (Fig. 3C). Taken together, these results indicated that esculetin potently antagonizes the cellular effects of β-catenin–Tcf-dependent transactivation.

To further confirm the inhibitory effects of esculetin on the Wnt–β-catenin signaling pathway, we determined the effect of esculetin on Wnt–β-catenin signaling in vivo. During early Xenopus development, ectopic expression of β-catenin on the future ventral side leads to duplication of the embryonic body axis. This developmental model has been well established to investigate the regulation of Wnt–β-catenin signaling in vivo (46). Thus, this developmental model pathway provides rigorous methods for determining the biologic effects of compounds on the β-catenin–Tcf pathway. Approximately 90% of embryos injected with 250 pg of β-catenin mRNA showed duplication of ventral–dorsal axis (Fig. 3D). In contrast, coinjection of β-catenin mRNA with 5 pmol of esculetin inhibited the induction of axis duplication, with no contribution from the DMSO vehicle (Fig. 3D). These experiments further support the notion that esculetin inhibits the β-catenin–Tcf-dependent signaling pathway.

Esculetin decreases viability and inhibits anchorage-independent growth of colon cancer cells

To determine the biologic effects of esculetin in cells, HCT116, HCT15, and DLD1 colon cancer cells were treated for 72 hours with various concentration of esculetin and cell viability was assessed by the MTS assay. Esculetin decreased viability of all three cell lines in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). In addition, we evaluated the effect of esculetin on anchorage-independent cell growth. HCT116, HCT15, and DLD1 colon cancer cells were seeded with esculetin in 0.3% agar and incubated for 3 weeks. Data showed that esculetin significantly suppressed anchorage-independent cell growth in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). These results indicated that esculetin had antiproliferative and antitumorigenic effects against human colon cancer cells.

Figure 4.

Anticancer activity of esculetin. A, esculetin inhibits proliferation of colon cancer cells. Cells were treated with esculetin for 72 hours, and proliferation was analyzed using the MTS assay. B, esculetin inhibits anchorage-independent cell growth. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; inhibitory effect of esculetin on cancer cell growth and anchorage-independent cell growth.

Figure 4.

Anticancer activity of esculetin. A, esculetin inhibits proliferation of colon cancer cells. Cells were treated with esculetin for 72 hours, and proliferation was analyzed using the MTS assay. B, esculetin inhibits anchorage-independent cell growth. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; inhibitory effect of esculetin on cancer cell growth and anchorage-independent cell growth.

Close modal

Esculetin inhibits tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model

To examine the antitumor activity of esculetin in vivo, HCT116 cancer cells were injected into the right flank of individual athymic nude mice. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with vehicle or esculetin at 20 or 100 mg/kg body weight 3 times a week for 2 weeks. Esculetin treatment suppressed xenograft tumor development in mice. Treatment with 20 and 100 mg/kg esculetin significantly inhibited HCT116 tumor size by 44% and 64%, respectively, relative to the vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 5A). All mice, including those treated with only esculetin, were viable at the end of the experiment, and body weight loss was not observed in any mice treated with esculetin. This indicates that the doses used were not overtly toxic to the animals.

Figure 5.

Esculetin inhibits xenograft tumor growth. A, the average tumor volume of control and esculetin-treated mice. Esculetin suppresses colon tumor growth. B, esculetin inhibits cyclin D1 and c-Myc expression in tumor tissues. The tumor tissues derived from groups treated with vehicle or 20 or 100 mg esculetin per kilogram of body weight were immunostained with the indicated antibody. Positively stained cells were counted and the values were converted to a graphic representation. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; inhibitory effect of esculetin on expression of Ki-67, cyclin D1, and c-Myc.

Figure 5.

Esculetin inhibits xenograft tumor growth. A, the average tumor volume of control and esculetin-treated mice. Esculetin suppresses colon tumor growth. B, esculetin inhibits cyclin D1 and c-Myc expression in tumor tissues. The tumor tissues derived from groups treated with vehicle or 20 or 100 mg esculetin per kilogram of body weight were immunostained with the indicated antibody. Positively stained cells were counted and the values were converted to a graphic representation. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; inhibitory effect of esculetin on expression of Ki-67, cyclin D1, and c-Myc.

Close modal

Using the xenograft tumor tissues, we examined the effect of esculetin on a tumor proliferation marker, Ki-67. The expression of Ki-67 was markedly inhibited by treatment with esculetin. In addition, we investigated the effect of esculetin on the direct targets of Wnt–β-catenin signaling, cyclin D1, and c-Myc by immunohistochemical analysis of HCT116 xenograft tumor tissues. Expression of cyclin D1 and c-Myc also was suppressed by treatment with esculetin (Fig. 5B). These data suggested that esculetin inhibited HCT116 colon tumor development by suppressing Wnt–β-catenin signaling.

CRC is the third most common cancer in men and women and is the third leading cause of cancer death (39, 40). Thus, the causes and methods of preventing and treating colon cancer are a high priority. In particular, abnormal activation of Wnt signaling has been tightly linked to colon cancer. Therefore, identifying small molecules targeting Wnt signaling is a promising preventive or treatment strategy against cancer.

In the current study, we identified a natural product, esculetin, as a potent inhibitor of Wnt signaling. Previously, the inhibitory effect of esculetin on cell proliferation in many cell lines has been reported (32, 33, 43, 44). However, the molecular mechanism of the antiproliferation effect of esculetin against colon cancer cells is not clearly understood. In the present study, we demonstrated that esculetin could disrupt the interaction between β-catenin and Tcf by targeting β-catenin, leading to suppression of the proliferation of three different colon cancer cell lines without exhibiting any significant cytotoxic effects on the viability of normal human colon cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). In addition, we demonstrated that esculetin potently antagonized the cellular effects of β-catenin–dependent activity in human colon cancer cells and in an animal model (Fig. 3). Moreover, esculetin effectively decreased viability and inhibited colony formation of human colon cancer cells (Fig. 4) and tumorigenesis in vivo (Fig. 5). A high level of the β-catenin–Tcf transcriptional complex caused by the accumulation of β-catenin is associated with human colon cancer and colon carcinogenesis (9, 14, 16, 41, 42). Overall, our results suggest that esculetin could be a potential chemopreventive agent against colon carcinogenesis. In particular, our results showing that esculetin could effectively inhibit β-catenin–induced morphogenesis in the frog provide strong evidence supporting the potential preventive effect of esculetin.

Recently, a number of existing drugs and natural compounds were reported to be antagonists of Wnt signaling. However, their molecular mechanisms of action and cellular targets are largely unknown, making their applications in cancer prevention and treatment and drug development very limited. In the present studies, we identified esculetin as a potent natural inhibitor of the Wnt–β-catenin signaling pathway and elucidated its molecular mechanism of action. Thus, we suggest that esculetin could be a potent cancer therapeutic and preventive agent. However, several challenges remain to be addressed in the development of clinically useful Wnt pathway inhibitors. We screened many natural compounds that might affect the binding of Tcf to β-catenin. However, biochemical and structural studies showed that the region of β-catenin that binds to Tcf overlaps other binding partners, such as E-cadherin and APC (47, 48). In the future, we will address whether esculetin can disrupt other interactions or whether it is selective for the β-catenin–Tcf protein–protein interaction. In addition, although esculetin, a nontoxic natural compound, appears to be potentially useful in treating or preventing cancer, its efficacy, safety, and toxicity need to be elucidated.

In conclusion, we identified esculetin as a potent inhibitor of Wnt–β-catenin signaling, which acts by targeting β-catenin to effectively suppress proliferation of human colon cancer cells both in culture and in vivo. Overall, these results indicate that esculetin could be a potential therapeutic or preventive and safe agent against human colon cancers.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: S-Y. Lee, T.G. Lim, H. Chen, S.K. Jung, H-J. Lee, K.W. Lee, Z. Dong

Development of methodology: S-Y. Lee, H. Chen, Z. Dong

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): S-Y. Lee, T.G. Lim, M-H. Lee, A. Shin, Z. Dong

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): S-Y. Lee, T.G. Lim, H. Chen, Z. Dong

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: S-Y. Lee, T.G. Lim, H. Chen, K.W. Lee, A.M. Bode, Z. Dong

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): S-Y. Lee, H. Chen, H-J. Lee, M-H. Lee, D-J. Kim, A.M. Bode, Z. Dong

Study supervision: H-J. Lee, K.W. Lee, A.M. Bode, Y-J. Surh, Z. Dong

This work was financially supported by The Hormel Foundation and National Institutes of Health (grant nos. CA120388, CA1666011, CA172457, and R37 CA081064), the World Class University Grant, Ministry of Education, Science, Technology, Republic of Korea (grant no. R31-2008-000-10103-0), the National Leap Research Program (No. 2010-0029233) through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea, Republic of Korea and by the Global Frontier Project grant (NRF-M1AXA002-2012M3A6A4054949) of National Research Foundation funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea, Republic of Korea.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Moon
RT
,
Kohn
AD
,
De Ferrari
GV
,
Kaykas
A
. 
WNT and beta-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies
.
Nat Rev Genet
2004
;
5
:
691
701
.
2.
Logan
CY
,
Nusse
R
. 
The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease
.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
2004
;
20
:
781
810
.
3.
Miller
JR
,
Hocking
AM
,
Brown
JD
,
Moon
RT
. 
Mechanism and function of signal transduction by the Wnt/beta-catenin and Wnt/Ca2+ pathways
.
Oncogene
1999
;
18
:
7860
72
.
4.
Moon
RT
. 
Teaching resource. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling
.
Sci STKE
2004
;
2004
:
tr5
.
5.
Peifer
M
,
Polakis
P
. 
Wnt signaling in oncogenesis and embryogenesis–a look outside the nucleus
.
Science
2000
;
287
:
1606
9
.
6.
Polakis
P
. 
Wnt signaling and cancer
.
Genes Dev
2000
;
14
:
1837
51
.
7.
Sokol
SY
. 
Wnt signaling and dorso-ventral axis specification in vertebrates
.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
1999
;
9
:
405
10
.
8.
De Robertis
EM
,
Kuroda
H
. 
Dorsal-ventral patterning and neural induction in Xenopus embryos
.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Bio1
2004
;
20
:
285
308
.
9.
Wang
J
,
Sinha
T
,
Wynshaw-Boris
A
. 
Wnt signaling in mammalian development: lessons from mouse genetics
.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol
2012
;
4
:
pii
:
a007963
.
10.
Wodarz
A
,
Nusse
R
. 
Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development
.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Bio1
1998
;
14
:
59
88
.
11.
Flaherty
MP
,
Kamerzell
TJ
,
Dawn
B
. 
Wnt signaling and cardiac differentiation
.
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci
2012
;
111
:
153
74
.
12.
Kharaishvili
G
,
Simkova
D
,
Makharoblidze
E
,
Trtkova
K
,
Kolar
Z
,
Bouchal
J
. 
Wnt signaling in prostate development and carcinogenesis
.
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub
2011
;
155
:
11
8
.
13.
Miyoshi
K
,
Rosner
A
,
Nozawa
M
,
Byrd
C
,
Morgan
F
,
Landesman-Bollag
E
, et al
Activation of different Wnt/beta-catenin signaling components in mammary epithelium induces transdifferentiation and the formation of pilar tumors
.
Oncogene
2002
;
21
:
5548
56
.
14.
Miyoshi
K
,
Hennighausen
L
. 
Beta-catenin: a transforming actor on many stages
.
Breast Cancer Res
2003
;
5
:
63
8
.
15.
Segditsas
S
,
Tomlinson
I
. 
Colorectal cancer and genetic alterations in the Wnt pathway
.
Oncogene
2006
;
25
:
7531
7
.
16.
Morin
PJ
,
Sparks
AB
,
Korinek
V
,
Barker
N
,
Clevers
H
,
Vogelstein
B
, et al
Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC
.
Science
1997
;
275
:
1787
90
.
17.
Fearnhead
NS
,
Wilding
JL
,
Bodmer
WF
. 
Genetics of colorectal cancer: hereditary aspects and overview of colorectal tumorigenesis
.
Br Med Bull
2002
;
64
:
27
43
.
18.
Moravec
M
. 
[Colorectal cancer and canonical Wnt signaling pathway]
.
Cas Lek Cesk
2012
;
151
:
335
42
.
19.
Herbst
A
,
Kolligs
FT
. 
Wnt signaling as a therapeutic target for cancer
.
Methods Mol Biol
2007
;
361
:
63
91
.
20.
Luu
HH
,
Zhang
R
,
Haydon
RC
,
Rayburn
E
,
Kang
Q
,
Si
W
, et al
Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway as a novel cancer drug target
.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets
2004
;
4
:
653
71
.
21.
Kikuchi
A
. 
Roles of Axin in the Wnt signaling pathway
.
Cell Signal
1999
;
11
:
777
88
.
22.
Clevers
H
,
Nusse
R
. 
Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease
.
Cell
2012
;
149
:
1192
205
.
23.
Behrens
J
. 
The role of the Wnt signaling pathway in colorectal tumorigenesis
.
Biochem Soc Trans
2005
;
33
:
672
5
.
24.
Jemal
A
,
Bray
F
,
Center
MM
,
Ferlay
J
,
Ward
E
,
Forman
D
. 
Global cancer statistics
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2011
;
61
:
69
90
.
25.
Buchert
M
,
Athineos
D
,
Abud
HE
,
Burke
ZD
,
Faux
MC
,
Samuel
MS
, et al
Genetic dissection of differential signaling threshold requirements for the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in vivo
.
PLoS Genet
2010
;
6
:
e1000816
.
26.
Klaus
A
,
Birchmeier
W
. 
Wnt signaling and its impact on development and cancer
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2008
;
8
:
387
98
.
27.
He
TC
,
Sparks
AB
,
Rago
C
,
Hermeking
H
,
Zawel
L
,
da Costa
LT
, et al
Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway
.
Science
1998
;
281
:
1509
12
.
28.
Shtutman
M
,
Zhurinsky
J
,
Simcha
I
,
Albanese
C
,
D'Amico
M
,
Pestell
R
, et al
The cyclin D1 gene is a target of the beta-catenin/LEF-1 pathway
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1999
;
96
:
5522
7
.
29.
Tetsu
O
,
McCormick
F
. 
Beta-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells
.
Nature
1999
;
398
:
422
6
.
30.
Cai
Y
,
Luo
Q
,
Sun
M
,
Corke
H
. 
Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer
.
Life Sci
2004
;
74
:
2157
84
.
31.
Bubols
GB
,
Vianna
DD
,
Medina-Remon
A
,
von Poser
G
,
Lamuela-Raventos
RM
,
Eifler-Lima
VL
, et al
The antioxidant activity of coumarins and flavonoids
.
Mini Rev Med Chem
2012
;
13
:
318
34
.
32.
Ng
TB
,
Liu
F
,
Wang
ZT
. 
Antioxidative activity of natural products from plants
.
Life Sci
2000
;
66
:
709
23
.
33.
Adfa
M
,
Yoshimura
T
,
Komura
K
,
Koketsu
M
. 
Antitermite activities of coumarin derivatives and scopoletin from Protium javanicum Burm. f
.
J Chem Ecol
2010
;
36
:
720
6
.
34.
Panossian
AG
. 
Inhibition of arachidonic acid 5-lipoxygenase of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes by esculetin
.
Biomed Biochim Acta
1984
;
43
:
1351
5
.
35.
Sekiya
K
,
Okuda
H
,
Arichi
S
. 
Selective inhibition of platelet lipoxygenase by esculetin
.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1982
;
713
:
68
72
.
36.
Awaad
AS
,
Al-Jaber
NA
,
Soliman
GA
,
Al-Outhman
MR
,
Zain
ME
,
Moses
JE
, et al
New biological activities of Casimiroa edulis leaf extract and isolated compounds
.
Phytother Res
2012
;
26
:
452
7
.
37.
Kaneko
T
,
Tahara
S
,
Takabayashi
F
. 
Inhibitory effect of natural coumarin compounds, esculetin and esculin, on oxidative DNA damage and formation of aberrant crypt foci and tumors induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in rat colons
.
Biol Pharm Bull
2007
;
30
:
2052
7
.
38.
Yang
J
,
Xiao
YL
,
He
XR
,
Qiu
GF
,
Hu
XM
. 
Aesculetin-induced apoptosis through a ROS-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction pathway in human cervical cancer cells
.
J Asian Nat prod Res
2010
;
12
:
185
93
.
39.
Matsunaga
K
,
Yoshimi
N
,
Yamada
Y
,
Shimizu
M
,
Kawabata
K
,
Ozawa
Y
, et al
Inhibitory effects of nabumetone, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, and esculetin, a lipoxygenase inhibitor, on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats
.
Jpn J Cancer Res
1998
;
89
:
496
501
.
40.
Schrödinger Suite Schrödinger, LLC
; 
2011
.
41.
Miller
JR
,
Mikol
Y
. 
Surveillance for diarrheal disease in New York City
.
J Urban Health
1999
;
76
:
388
90
.
42.
Graham
TA
,
Weaver
C
,
Mao
F
,
Kimelman
D
,
Xu
W
. 
Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/Tcf complex
.
Cell
2000
;
103
:
885
96
.
43.
Poy
F
,
Lepourcelet
M
,
Shivdasani
RA
,
Eck
MJ
. 
Structure of a human Tcf4-beta-catenin complex
.
Nat Struct Biol
2001
;
8
:
1053
7
.
44.
Berman
HM
,
Westbrook
J
,
Feng
Z
,
Gilliland
G
,
Bhat
TN
,
Weissig
H
, et al
The protein data bank
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2000
;
28
:
235
42
.
45.
Zhou
JJ
,
Xie
GR
,
Yan
XJ
. 
Traditional Chinese medicines: Molecular structures, natural sources and applications
.
China
: Chemical Industry Press
; 
2004
.
46.
Moon
RT
,
Kimelman
D
. 
From cortical rotation to organizer gene expression: toward a molecular explanation of axis specification in Xenopus
.
BioEssays
1998
;
20
:
536
45
.
47.
Sommer
T
,
Hirsch
C
. 
San1p, checking up on nuclear proteins
.
Cell
2005
;
120
:
734
6
.
48.
Liu
J
,
Xing
Y
,
Hinds
TR
,
Zheng
J
,
Xu
W
. 
The third 20 amino acid repeat is the tightest binding site of APC for beta-catenin
.
J Mol Biol
2006
;
360
:
133
44
.