Background and Aims: In patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), reflux-induced injury promotes esophageal adenocarcinoma, presumably through cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) related pathways. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may interrupt reflux-associated carcinogenesis by reducing acid exposure and subsequent inflammation. However, clinical trial data regarding the chemopreventive efficacy of a PPI + NSAID combination are limited. The aim of this multi-center, randomized, phase II trial was to assess the effects of a 28-day intervention with esomeprazole 40 mg bid and aspirin 81 mg qd, 325 mg qd, or placebo qd on tissue prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations in BE patients.

Methods: Using the infrastructure of the Cancer Prevention Network, participants (> 18 years) with histologically confirmed non dysplastic BE were randomly assigned to receive one of three interventions for 28 days: (arm A) esomeprazole 40 mg bid+ aspirin 81 mg placebo qd + aspirin 325 mg placebo qd (n=42); (arm B) esomeprazole 40 mg bid+ aspirin 81 mg qd + aspirin placebo 325 qd (n=63); (arm C) esomeprazole 40 mg bid + aspirin 81 mg qd placebo + aspirin 325 mg qd (n=63). Esophageal biopsies were obtained pre- and post-intervention to assess change in PGE2 concentration as the primary endpoint.

Results: In total, 122 participants were randomized, 121 (99%) completed the trial per protocol, and 115 (94%) were evaluated for the primary endpoint. Baseline characteristics were similar across intervention arms. The absolute change (mean + SD) in tissue PGE2 concentration was −67.6 (229.68) in Arm A, −120.9 (281.28) in Arm B (p = 0.10 vs Arm A) and −174.9 (263.62) in Arm C (p = 0.02 vs Arm A).

Conclusions: In combination with esomeprazole 40 mg twice per day, aspirin 325 mg per day significantly reduced tissue PGE2 concentration in BE patients after a 28-day intervention, as compared to aspirin placebo. Given the relevance of PGE2 pathways in BE-associated carcinogenesis, further evaluation of this chemoprevention strategy in larger, more definitive phase III trials is warranted.

Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2011;4(10 Suppl):CN06-03.

Copyright © American Association for Cancer Research
2011