To evaluate the role of oxidative stress in prostate cancer risk, we analyzed serum levels of protein carbonyl groups in 1,808 prostate cancer cases and 1,805 controls, nested in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that found finasteride decreased prostate cancer risk. There were no significant differences in protein carbonyl levels in baseline samples between those later diagnosed with prostate cancer and those without at the end of study biopsy. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the 4th quartile of protein carbonyl level for the combined, placebo, and finasteride arms were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.85-1.24), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.12), and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.94-1.71), respectively. There were no significant associations between carbonyl level and risk when analyzing high-grade and low-grade disease separately, nor did finasteride affect protein oxidation levels. The results of this large nested case-control study do not support the hypothesis that oxidative stress, at least as measured by protein carbonyl level, plays a role in prostate cancer. Cancer Prev Res; 3(4); 478–83. ©2010 AACR.

Increases in the generation of reactive oxygen species and decreases in antioxidant enzyme activities with aging have been reported in the prostate (1, 2) and are also observed in age-related disorders such as atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and cataracts (3). Several studies have shown that proteins are a target for reactive oxidants in cells and that oxidized proteins accumulate during aging, oxidative stress, and in some pathologic conditions (4). However, only a limited number of studies have actually evaluated oxidative damage in relation to exposures thought to increase reactive oxygen species or have assessed its relationship with prostate carcinogenesis (3). In this nested case-control study, we measured protein carbonyls, a marker for oxidative damage, in serum samples from men who participated in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) and had received either finasteride or placebo treatment from 1993 to 2003 (5). The goal of this investigation was to determine whether baseline levels of serum levels of oxidized proteins are associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer or high-grade disease. We also examined associations between serum protein carbonyl levels and other factors thought to be associated with oxidative stress levels.

Study design and study population

Data and biospecimens used in this study came from the PCPT, a large, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that tested whether finasteride could reduce the period prevalence of prostate cancer during the 7-y intervention. Details about study design and population characteristics have been described previously (5). Briefly, a total of 18,880 men ages 55 y or older, with a normal digital rectal examination (DRE), a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤3 ng/mL, and no prior history of prostate cancer, severe benign prostate hyperplasia, or other clinically significant diseases, were randomized to receive finasteride (5 mg/d) or placebo. Participants underwent DRE and PSA test annually, and a prostate biopsy was recommended for participants with an abnormal DRE or a PSA of ≥4.0 ng/mL. The PSA level prompting a biopsy recommendation in the finasteride group was adjusted so as to result in a similar number of biopsy recommendations in both study groups. After 7 y on-study, all men with PSA values consistently ≤4.0 ng/mL and nonsuspicious DREs who were not previously diagnosed with prostate cancer were offered an end-of-study biopsy. All biopsies were done under transrectal ultrasonographic guidance and included a minimum of six cores. All prostate biopsies were reviewed by both the pathologist at the local study site and a pathologist at a central PCPT pathology laboratory to confirm the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Discordant pathology diagnoses were reviewed by a referee pathologist, and concordance was achieved in all cases. Clinical stage was assigned locally and the Gleason scoring system was used centrally to grade the tumor. Low-grade prostate cancer was defined as tumors with Gleason score <7 and high-grade prostate cancer, with Gleason score ≥7. In this study, we used a nested case-control design to evaluate whether higher levels of serum oxidized proteins were associated with higher overall prostate cancer risk and high-grade disease and whether the effects of finasteride on prostate cancer risk differed between men with high and low levels of serum oxidized protein. Cases were defined as men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer and controls were biopsy negative, both having available serum samples for oxidized protein analysis. Controls were frequency matched to cases on age in 5-y increments, PCPT treatment arm (finasteride versus placebo), and positive family history (first-degree relative with prostate cancer). Controls were oversampled to include all nonwhites to increase power for analyses by race/ethnicity. The final sample size for this study was 1,808 cases and 1,805 controls.

Data collection

Following each PCPT participant's informed consent and enrollment, data on sociodemographic characteristics, including age, race, education, physical activity, smoking, fruit intake, vegetable intake, treatment arm (finasteride/placebo), and family history of prostate cancer, were collected. Height and weight were measured at the baseline clinic visit and weight was measured annually thereafter. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m2) and categorized as <25 (normal), 25 to 30 (overweight), and ≥30 (obese). A food frequency questionnaire was administered at the participant's first annual visit and was completed by 88% of the participant population, from which daily fruit and vegetable intakes were calculated.

Biospecimen collection, processing, and storage

Blood samples were collected into vacutainers without anticoagulant but with a gel to separate serum from clot from all cases and controls 3 mo before randomization and annually. Samples were centrifuged after 30 to 60 min at room temperature and sera stored at −70°C. Detailed procedures for blood collection, processing, and storage have been described previously (6).

Serum oxidized protein measurement

The levels of serum protein carbonyl groups were assessed using a noncompetitive ELISA, as previously described (7). Briefly, the oxidized protein standard was prepared by incubation of bovine serum albumin with 0.73 mol/L H2O2 and 0.42 mmol/L Fe2+ for 1 h at 37°C and carbonyl content was measured spectrophotometrically (8). Total protein concentration in the serum was measured using a bicinchoninic acid kit (Sigma) and the samples were diluted with PBS to a final protein concentration of 4 mg/ mL. After derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, the plate was coated with 200 μL of sample (1 μg) and incubated overnight at 4°C in the dark. Biotinylated primary anti–2,4-dinitrophenol antibody (Molecular Probes) was followed by the addition of the streptavidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Amersham). Color was developed by adding the tetramethyl benzidine liquid substrate system (Sigma) and the reaction was stopped with H2SO4. The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 450 nm. Serum protein carbonyl concentration was expressed as nanomoles of carbonyl per milliliter of serum. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate. To account for plate variation, values were adjusted for a plate-specific control. Two pooled serum samples were used for additional quality control. These samples were blinded and interspersed among the study participant samples. The coefficient of variation for QC pool 1 (n = 49) was 16.3% and 15.2% for pool 2 (n = 53).

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of cases and controls were compared using χ2 test for categorical variables and t test for continuous variables. Serum concentrations of protein carbonyls were categorized into quartiles based on the distribution in the controls. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for prostate cancer risk using multiple logistic regression analysis and polychotomous logistic regression models to calculate ORs for low-grade and high-grade prostate cancer compared with controls. These analyses were adjusted for age (continuous), race (white versus nonwhite), education (high school degree or less, some college or college degree, and advanced degree), physical activity (moderate or active versus sedentary or light), smoking (nonsmoker, current, and past), daily fruit intake (<1 serving, 1 to <2 servings, and 2+ servings), daily vegetable intake (<1 serving, 1 to <2 servings, 2 to <3 servings and 3+ servings), treatment arm (finasteride versus placebo), and family history of prostate cancer in first-degree relatives (yes versus no). We also conducted stratified analyses to assess the interaction between oxidized protein concentration and finasteride use. All P values were two-sided and were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. All analyses were done using SAS (version 9.0).

The characteristics of the cases and controls are shown in Table 1. Due to the sampling scheme, 93% of cases and 79% of controls were Caucasian. There were no significant differences between cases and controls according to age, BMI, smoking status, education, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and daily vegetable and fruit intake. The mean levels of serum protein carbonyls between cases (19.83 ± 4.39 nmol/mL) and controls (19.81 ± 3.74 nmol/mL) were also similar. When we compared protein carbonyl levels in cases and controls stratified by variables that are thought to be associated with oxidative stress, no significant associations were found in either cases or controls (Table 2). We also measured serum protein carbonyl levels in the second year of intervention, but did not observe any differences compared with baseline by treatment arm (data not shown).

Table 1.

Characteristics of cases and controls

VariablesControl (n = 1,805)Case (n = 1,808)P*
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Age at baseline (y) 63.58 (5.55) 63.62 (5.54) 0.60 
Oxidized protein 
    Oxidized protein, nmol/mL 19.81 (3.74) 19.83 (4.39) 0.91 
 n (%) n (%)  
Physical activity 
    Sedentary 314 (17.4) 310 (17.2) 0.52 
    Light 742 (41.3) 748 (41.5)  
    Moderate 553 (30.8) 593 (32.9)  
    Active 188 (10.5) 150 (8.3)  
Alcohol drinking (g/d) 
    0 415 (23.0) 410 (22.6) 0.60 
    <30 1,236 (68.5) 1,232 (68.1)  
    ≥30 154 (8.5) 166 (9.1)  
BMI 
    Normal (BMI <25) 449 (25.1) 499 (27.9) 0.54 
    Overweight (BMI 25 to <30) 944 (52.8) 917 (51.2)  
    Obese (BMI ≥30) 394 (21.8) 376 (20.8)  
Education 
    Grade school or some high school 77 (4.3) 72 (4.0) 0.12 
    High school graduate or GED 273 (15.1) 236 (13.1)  
    Voc/training school, some college, college grad 1,454 (80.6) 1,499 (82.9)  
Family history of prostate cancer 384 (21.3) 384 (21.2) 0.98 
Finasteride arm 765 (42.4) 764 (42.3) 0.94 
Fruit consumption (servings/d) 
    <1 561 (34.7) 530 (34.0) 0.79 
    1 to <2 581 (36.0) 570 (36.6)  
    2+ 473 (29.3) 457 (29.4)  
Race 
    Nonwhite 372 (20.6) 130 (7.2) <0.0001 
    Nonhispanic white 1,433 (79.4) 1,678 (92.8)  
Smoking status 
    Never 619 (34.3) 644 (35.6) 0.48 
    Former 1,047 (58.0) 1,041 (57.6)  
    Current 139 (7.7) 123 (6.8)  
Vegetable consumption (servings/d) 
    <1 211 (13.1) 200 (12.9) 0.94 
    1 to <2 595 (36.8) 562 (36.1)  
    2 to <3 428 (26.5) 441 (28.3)  
    3+ 381 (23.6) 354 (22.7)  
VariablesControl (n = 1,805)Case (n = 1,808)P*
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Age at baseline (y) 63.58 (5.55) 63.62 (5.54) 0.60 
Oxidized protein 
    Oxidized protein, nmol/mL 19.81 (3.74) 19.83 (4.39) 0.91 
 n (%) n (%)  
Physical activity 
    Sedentary 314 (17.4) 310 (17.2) 0.52 
    Light 742 (41.3) 748 (41.5)  
    Moderate 553 (30.8) 593 (32.9)  
    Active 188 (10.5) 150 (8.3)  
Alcohol drinking (g/d) 
    0 415 (23.0) 410 (22.6) 0.60 
    <30 1,236 (68.5) 1,232 (68.1)  
    ≥30 154 (8.5) 166 (9.1)  
BMI 
    Normal (BMI <25) 449 (25.1) 499 (27.9) 0.54 
    Overweight (BMI 25 to <30) 944 (52.8) 917 (51.2)  
    Obese (BMI ≥30) 394 (21.8) 376 (20.8)  
Education 
    Grade school or some high school 77 (4.3) 72 (4.0) 0.12 
    High school graduate or GED 273 (15.1) 236 (13.1)  
    Voc/training school, some college, college grad 1,454 (80.6) 1,499 (82.9)  
Family history of prostate cancer 384 (21.3) 384 (21.2) 0.98 
Finasteride arm 765 (42.4) 764 (42.3) 0.94 
Fruit consumption (servings/d) 
    <1 561 (34.7) 530 (34.0) 0.79 
    1 to <2 581 (36.0) 570 (36.6)  
    2+ 473 (29.3) 457 (29.4)  
Race 
    Nonwhite 372 (20.6) 130 (7.2) <0.0001 
    Nonhispanic white 1,433 (79.4) 1,678 (92.8)  
Smoking status 
    Never 619 (34.3) 644 (35.6) 0.48 
    Former 1,047 (58.0) 1,041 (57.6)  
    Current 139 (7.7) 123 (6.8)  
Vegetable consumption (servings/d) 
    <1 211 (13.1) 200 (12.9) 0.94 
    1 to <2 595 (36.8) 562 (36.1)  
    2 to <3 428 (26.5) 441 (28.3)  
    3+ 381 (23.6) 354 (22.7)  

*P values were calculated based on a two-sided t test, comparing cases to controls; unordered categorical P values were calculated based on a χ2 test; ordered categorical variables were assigned values 1/2/3, etc., and then treated as continuous variables to calculate P-trend values.

Controls were frequency matched to cases based on age, family history of prostate cancer, and treatment arm (finasteride or placebo).

Minorities were oversampled for the control population.

Table 2.

Mean serum protein carbonyl levels among cases and controls stratified by select variables

VariablesControlsCases
nProtein carbonyls (nmol/mL)P*nProtein carbonyls (nmol/mL)P*
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Age (y) 
    <63 831 19.84 (3.77) 0.80 800 19.64 (3.88) 0.09 
    ≥63 974 19.79 (3.71)  1,008 19.98 (4.76)  
Fruit intake (servings/d) 
    <1 561 19.51 (3.74) 0.01 530 19.50 (3.33) 0.13 
    1 to <2 581 20.18 (3.78)  570 20.03 (5.83)  
    2+ 473 19.62 (3.71)  457 19.64 (3.73)  
Vegetable intake (servings/d) 
    <1 211 19.78 (3.84) 0.10 200 19.20 (3.48) 0.25 
    1 to <2 595 19.89 (3.71)  562 19.71 (4.09)  
    2 to <3 428 20.01 (3.83)  441 19.79 (3.56)  
    3+ 381 19.38 (3.67)  354 20.00 (6.33)  
BMI 
    Normal (BMI <25) 449 19.79 (3.86) 0.28 499 19.79 (3.69) 0.97 
    Overweight (BMI 25 to <30) 944 19.92 (3.77)  917 19.85 (5.01)  
    Obese (BMI 30+) 394 19.57 (3.55)  376 19.82 (3.62)  
Alcohol intake (g/d) 
    0 415 19.69 (3.72) 0.75 410 19.85 (3.42) 0.95 
    >0 to <30 1,236 19.85 (3.73)  1,232 19.81 (3.84)  
    30+ 154 19.84 (3.83)  166 19.93 (8.51)  
Smoking 
    Never 619 19.90 (3.87) 0.63 644 19.66 (3.56) 0.29 
    Former 1,047 19.80 (3.69)  1,041 19.87 (4.93)  
    Current 139 19.57 (3.52)  123 20.31 (3.42)  
Physical activity 
    Sedentary 314 19.80 (3.66) 0.97 310 19.72 (3.55) 0.58 
    Light 742 19.85 (3.69)  748 19.89 (3.84)  
    Moderate 553 19.84 (3.80)  593 19.91 (5.51)  
    Active 188 19.71 (3.83)  150 19.40 (3.57)  
Gleason grade 
    <7    1,235 19.73 (3.74) 0.31 
    7+    495 19.97 (5.77)  
Treatment arm 
    Placebo 1,040 19.82 (3.79) 0.93 1,044 19.73 (3.87) 0.27 
    Finasteride 765 19.80 (3.67)  764 19.97 (5.02)  
VariablesControlsCases
nProtein carbonyls (nmol/mL)P*nProtein carbonyls (nmol/mL)P*
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Age (y) 
    <63 831 19.84 (3.77) 0.80 800 19.64 (3.88) 0.09 
    ≥63 974 19.79 (3.71)  1,008 19.98 (4.76)  
Fruit intake (servings/d) 
    <1 561 19.51 (3.74) 0.01 530 19.50 (3.33) 0.13 
    1 to <2 581 20.18 (3.78)  570 20.03 (5.83)  
    2+ 473 19.62 (3.71)  457 19.64 (3.73)  
Vegetable intake (servings/d) 
    <1 211 19.78 (3.84) 0.10 200 19.20 (3.48) 0.25 
    1 to <2 595 19.89 (3.71)  562 19.71 (4.09)  
    2 to <3 428 20.01 (3.83)  441 19.79 (3.56)  
    3+ 381 19.38 (3.67)  354 20.00 (6.33)  
BMI 
    Normal (BMI <25) 449 19.79 (3.86) 0.28 499 19.79 (3.69) 0.97 
    Overweight (BMI 25 to <30) 944 19.92 (3.77)  917 19.85 (5.01)  
    Obese (BMI 30+) 394 19.57 (3.55)  376 19.82 (3.62)  
Alcohol intake (g/d) 
    0 415 19.69 (3.72) 0.75 410 19.85 (3.42) 0.95 
    >0 to <30 1,236 19.85 (3.73)  1,232 19.81 (3.84)  
    30+ 154 19.84 (3.83)  166 19.93 (8.51)  
Smoking 
    Never 619 19.90 (3.87) 0.63 644 19.66 (3.56) 0.29 
    Former 1,047 19.80 (3.69)  1,041 19.87 (4.93)  
    Current 139 19.57 (3.52)  123 20.31 (3.42)  
Physical activity 
    Sedentary 314 19.80 (3.66) 0.97 310 19.72 (3.55) 0.58 
    Light 742 19.85 (3.69)  748 19.89 (3.84)  
    Moderate 553 19.84 (3.80)  593 19.91 (5.51)  
    Active 188 19.71 (3.83)  150 19.40 (3.57)  
Gleason grade 
    <7    1,235 19.73 (3.74) 0.31 
    7+    495 19.97 (5.77)  
Treatment arm 
    Placebo 1,040 19.82 (3.79) 0.93 1,044 19.73 (3.87) 0.27 
    Finasteride 765 19.80 (3.67)  764 19.97 (5.02)  

*For factors with two levels, P values were based on a two-sided t test comparing mean protein values between levels; for factors with three or more levels, P values were based on a homogeneity of variance F test.

There was no significant association between serum protein carbonyl levels and risk of prostate cancer in either the placebo or the finasteride arm separately or in the entire study population (Table 3). Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for the 4th quartile of protein carbonyl level for the combined, placebo, and finasteride arms were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.85-1.24), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.12), and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.94-1.71), respectively. Although the association was stronger in the finasteride arm, it was not statistically significant (Table 3). Results were similar when we restricted our analysis to white participants only (data not shown).

Table 3.

ORs of prostate cancer by serum protein carbonyl levels

Protein carbonyls (nmol/mL)*CombinedFinasteride armPlacebo arm
Cases, n = 1,801Controls, n = 1,797OR (95% CI)Cases, n = 760Controls, n = 760OR (95% CI)Cases, n = 1,041Controls, n = 1,037OR (95% CI)
Quartile 1 (<17.35) 468 449 1.00 186 203 1.00 282 246 1.00 
Quartile 2 (17.5-19.5) 419 451 0.93 (0.77-1.12) 180 176 1.16 (0.86-1.57) 239 275 0.79 (0.61-1.01) 
Quartile 3 (19.6-22.1) 475 446 1.09 (0.91-1.32) 208 197 1.26 (0.94-1.68) 267 249 0.97 (0.76-1.25) 
Quartile 4 (>22.1) 439 451 1.03 (0.85-1.24) 186 184 1.27 (0.94-1.71) 253 267 0.88 (0.69-1.12) 
P-trend   0.42   0.09   0.66 
Protein carbonyls (nmol/mL)*CombinedFinasteride armPlacebo arm
Cases, n = 1,801Controls, n = 1,797OR (95% CI)Cases, n = 760Controls, n = 760OR (95% CI)Cases, n = 1,041Controls, n = 1,037OR (95% CI)
Quartile 1 (<17.35) 468 449 1.00 186 203 1.00 282 246 1.00 
Quartile 2 (17.5-19.5) 419 451 0.93 (0.77-1.12) 180 176 1.16 (0.86-1.57) 239 275 0.79 (0.61-1.01) 
Quartile 3 (19.6-22.1) 475 446 1.09 (0.91-1.32) 208 197 1.26 (0.94-1.68) 267 249 0.97 (0.76-1.25) 
Quartile 4 (>22.1) 439 451 1.03 (0.85-1.24) 186 184 1.27 (0.94-1.71) 253 267 0.88 (0.69-1.12) 
P-trend   0.42   0.09   0.66 

NOTE: All ORs were adjusted for age, race (white vs nonwhite), education (<HS, HS, ≥HS), smoking status (current, past, never), and physical activity (moderate or active vs sedentary or light). P-trend values were calculated by assigning values of 1/2/3/4 to OP quartiles and then treating as continuous.

*Quartile values were calculated based on controls only.

When examining associations between oxidized protein levels and prostate cancer grade, no statistically significant relationships were observed (Table 4). ORs and 95% CIs for high-grade cancer within the 4th quartile of protein carbonyl level for the combined, placebo, and finasteride arms were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.77-1.36), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.56-1.27), and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.83-1.87), respectively (Table 4). Results were similar when analyses were restricted to white participants only (data not shown).

Table 4.

ORs of low-grade and high-grade prostate cancer by serum protein carbonyl levels

GradeProtein carbonyl (nmol/mL)*
Q1 (<17.35)Q2 (17.5-19.5)Q3 (19.6-22.1)Q4 (>22.1)P-trend
nnOR (95% CI)nOR (95% CI)nOR (95% CI)
Combined arm Low-grade (n = 1,229) 328 284 0.89 (0.72-1.09) 318 1.04 (0.85-1.28) 299 1.00 (0.82-1.24) 0.6 
High-grade (n = 495) 127 114 0.96 (0.72-1.28) 134 1.12 (0.85-1.48) 120 1.02 (0.77-1.36) 0.61 
Finasteride arm Low-grade (n = 449) 114 110 1.14 (0.81-1.60) 112 1.12 (0.8-1.57) 113 1.28 (0.91-1.79) 0.19 
High-grade (n = 278) 67 60 1.11 (0.74-1.68) 84 1.39 (0.95-2.05) 67 1.25 (0.83-1.87) 0.16 
Placebo arm Low-grade (n = 780) 214 174 0.75 (0.58-0.98) 206 0.99 (0.76-1.29) 186 0.86 (0.66-1.12) 0.66 
High-grade (n = 217) 60 54 0.82 (0.55-1.24) 50 0.85 (0.56-1.30) 53 0.84 (0.56-1.27) 0.47 
GradeProtein carbonyl (nmol/mL)*
Q1 (<17.35)Q2 (17.5-19.5)Q3 (19.6-22.1)Q4 (>22.1)P-trend
nnOR (95% CI)nOR (95% CI)nOR (95% CI)
Combined arm Low-grade (n = 1,229) 328 284 0.89 (0.72-1.09) 318 1.04 (0.85-1.28) 299 1.00 (0.82-1.24) 0.6 
High-grade (n = 495) 127 114 0.96 (0.72-1.28) 134 1.12 (0.85-1.48) 120 1.02 (0.77-1.36) 0.61 
Finasteride arm Low-grade (n = 449) 114 110 1.14 (0.81-1.60) 112 1.12 (0.8-1.57) 113 1.28 (0.91-1.79) 0.19 
High-grade (n = 278) 67 60 1.11 (0.74-1.68) 84 1.39 (0.95-2.05) 67 1.25 (0.83-1.87) 0.16 
Placebo arm Low-grade (n = 780) 214 174 0.75 (0.58-0.98) 206 0.99 (0.76-1.29) 186 0.86 (0.66-1.12) 0.66 
High-grade (n = 217) 60 54 0.82 (0.55-1.24) 50 0.85 (0.56-1.30) 53 0.84 (0.56-1.27) 0.47 

NOTE: Low-grade, Gleason <7; high-grade, Gleason ≥7. All ORs were adjusted for age, race (white vs nonwhite), education (<HS, HS, ≥HS), smoking status (current, past, never), and physical activity (moderate or active vs sedentary or light). P-trend values were calculated by assigning values of 1/2/3/4 to OP quartiles and then treating as continuous.

*Quartile values were calculated based on controls only.

OR for low-grade and high-grade cancers were modeled by polychotomous logistic regression; both cancers are contrasted with controls in the same model.

There were no significant associations between prostate cancer risk or its aggressiveness and serum levels of oxidized protein as measured by protein carbonyls in this large nested case-control study. Whereas the cancer risk associated with the highest oxidized protein levels was slightly elevated in the finasteride arm, the association did not reach statistical significance. Finasteride did not seem to affect serum protein carbonyl levels when comparing baseline measurements to those obtained after 2 years on finasteride. There were also no significant associations between factors considered to be associated with increased oxidative stress and oxidized protein levels.

In our prior large study of breast cancer, protein oxidation, defined as high plasma levels of protein carbonyl groups, was significantly associated with a 60% increased risk of breast cancer (7). However, in contrast to the present study, blood samples were collected, on average, 3 mo after diagnosis and thus could have been affected by disease. Previous smaller studies have provided conflicting evidence on the association between protein oxidation and cancer risk, with positive results for Hodgkin's lymphoma (9) and bladder cancer (10), but not for lung (11) or brain (12) cancer. None of these studies were prospective.

Whereas aging is accompanied by increasing levels of oxidative damage, including protein oxidation (reviewed in ref. 13), no associations with age were observed in our study, perhaps due to the narrow age range of our participants. Significantly higher levels of oxidized proteins in smokers than in nonsmokers have been observed (11, 14), but we found no association between serum protein carbonyl levels and smoking status. Conflicting data have been observed for an association with fruit and vegetable intake (7, 1518). The lack of an association between these factors believed to be associated with increased oxidative stress and serum oxidized protein concentrations suggests that this measure may not be sensitive to environmental factors that increase oxidative stress.

In summary, in this large study using blood samples collected before diagnosis, we found no association between serum protein carbonyl levels and prostate cancer risk. Among controls, oxidized protein levels were not significantly associated with factors thought to be associated with oxidative stress. It is possible that serum levels of oxidized proteins do not accurately reflect oxidative damage in the prostate, which may have a more inflammatory environment; studies examining prostate tissue for oxidative damage may help clarify the role of oxidative stress in prostate cancer etiology.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support: Grants P01 CA108964, CA37429, P30 ES009089, R03 CA117490, and P30 CA013696 from the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

1
Tunn
S
,
Nass
R
,
Ekkernkamp
A
,
Schulze
H
,
Krieg
M
. 
Evaluation of average life span of epithelial and stromal cells of human prostate by superoxide dismutase activity
.
Prostate
1989
;
15
:
263
71
.
2
Warner
HR
. 
Superoxide dismutase, aging, and degenerative disease
.
Free Radic Biol Med
1994
;
17
:
249
58
.
3
Minelli
A
,
Bellezza
I
,
Conte
C
,
Culig
Z
. 
Oxidative stress-realted aging: a role for prostate cancer?
Biochim Biophys Acta
2009
;
1795
:
83
91
.
4
Beal
MF
. 
Oxidatively modified proteins in aging and disease
.
Free Radic Biol Med
2002
;
32
:
797
803
.
5
Thompson
IM
,
Goodman
PJ
,
Tangen
CM
, et al
. 
The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer
.
New Eng J Med
2003
;
349
:
213
22
.
6
Hoque
A
,
Goodman
P
,
Ambrosone
CB
, et al
. 
Extraction of DNA from serum for high-throughput genotyping: findings from pilot studies within the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
.
Urology
2008
;
71
:
967
70
.
7
Rossner
P
 Jr.
,
Gammon
MD
,
Terry
MB
, et al
. 
Plasma protein carbonyl levels and breast cancer risk
.
J Cell Mol Med
2007
;
11
:
1138
48
.
8
Levine
RL
,
Garland
D
,
Oliver
CN
, et al
. 
Determination of carbonyl content of oxidatively modified proteins
.
Methods Enzymol
1990
;
233
:
464
78
.
9
Morabito
F
,
Cristani
M
,
Saija
A
, et al
. 
Lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in patients affected by Hodgkin's lymphoma
.
Mediators Inflamm
2004
;
13
:
381
3
.
10
Yilmaz
IA
,
Akcay
T
,
Cakatay
U
,
Telci
A
,
Ataus
S
,
Yalcin
V
. 
Relation between bladder cancer and protein oxidation
.
Int Urol Nephrol
2003
;
35
:
345
50
.
11
Pignatelli
B
,
Li
CQ
,
Boffetta
P
, et al
. 
Nitrated and oxidized plasma proteins in smokers and lung cancer patients
.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
778
84
.
12
Kumar
P
,
Devi
U
,
Ali
S
, et al
. 
Plasma protein oxidation in patients with brain tumors
.
Neurol Res
2009
;
31
:
270
3
.
13
Stadtman
ER
,
Berlett
BS
. 
Reactive oxygen-mediated protein oxidation in aging and disease
.
Chem Res Toxicol
1997
;
10
:
485
94
.
14
Maragon
K
,
Devaraj
S
,
Jialal
I
. 
Measurement of protein carbonyls in plasma of smokers and in oxidized LDL by an ELISA
.
Clin Chem
1999
;
45
:
577
8
.
15
Bamonti
F
,
Novembrino
C
,
Ippolito
S
, et al
. 
Increased free malondialdehyde concentrations in smokers normalise with a mixed fruit and vegetable juice concentrate: a pilot study
.
Clin Chem Lab Med
2006
;
44
:
391
5
.
16
Thompson
HJ
,
Heimendinger
J
,
Sedlacek
SM
, et al
. 
8-Isoprostane F2α excretion is reduced in women by increased vegetable and fruit intake
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2005
;
82
:
768
76
.
17
Visioli
F
,
Riso
P
,
Grande
S
,
Galli
C
,
Porrini
M
. 
Protective activity of tomato products on in vivo markers of lipid oxidation
.
Eur J Nutr
2009
;
42
:
201
6
.
18
Dragsted
LO
,
Pedersen
A
,
Hermetter
A
, et al
. 
The 6-a-day study: effects of fruit and vegetables on markers of oxidative stress and antioxidative defense in healthy nonsmokers
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2009
;
79
:
1060
72
.