Optimization of T-cell Receptor–Modified T Cells for Cancer Therapy Free

T-cell activation is dependent upon T-cell receptor (TCR) engagement with peptides processed and presented in the context of a MHC (signal 1) and costimulation (signal 2; refs. 1, 2). Signal 2 is derived from CD28, 4-1BB, or OX-40 molecules (1, 2). T cells receiving both signals develop effector function and secrete proinflammatory cytokines. Without signal 2, T cells become anergic (3–5). Proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-12 (IL12) or type I interferon can act as signal 3 to heighten the effector function of T cells (6–10). Optimizing T-cell stimulation through this proinflammatory pathway may augment antitumor efficacy of tumor-targeted T cells.

Several clinical trials have tested autologous isolated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) or TCR-modified T cells for cancer therapy (11). Although these approaches can target extracellular and intracellular tumor-associated antigens, trial results have been modest (12–18). Strategies to enhance the potency of these TCR T cells include increasing the affinity of the TCR to tumor-associated antigens, although this sometimes has adverse effects (12, 19, 20). One promising method to enhance the efficacy of tumor-directed T cells is providing a stimulatory signal to TIL or TCR-modified T cells. Lack of T-cell activation may contribute to failure of T-cell therapies if tumor cells downregulate costimulatory molecule expression (21, 22).

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells carry an antigen-recognition domain fused to a costimulatory and CD3ζ domain, through which the cell receives both signals 1 and 2. This configuration eliminates the need for additional stimulation provided by antigen-presenting cells (APC) or tumor cells (23, 24). With CAR T-cell therapy, the single-chain variable fragment (scFv) in the CAR is directed toward extracellular antigens and not intracellular antigens that might be presented extracellularly within the context of an MHC. For certain tumor types, especially solid tumors, there are few extracellular antigens that can be distinguished from those of healthy tissues and specifically targeted by CARs, limiting potential targets. TCR-modified T cells, however, can be redirected to tumor-specific targets, including intracellular antigens, but are limited overall by a lack of T-cell activation (11, 21, 22). We hypothesized that proinflammatory cytokine modifications could activate T cells and enhance the efficacy of tumor-directed TCR-modified T cells. Here we explore approaches to enhance TCR-modified T cells through genetic engineering with proinflammatory IL12 or IL18 cytokines.

Clinical trials of patients treated with systemic recombinant IL12 have shown modest efficacy, although results have been limited by toxicities (25). Treatment with recombinant IL18 did not cause toxicities but showed limited clinical responses (26). Directing cytokines to the tumor site may alleviate toxicity and enhance antitumor responses. IL18-dependent signaling occurs through a heterodimeric receptor (IL18Rα and IL18Rβ). Most immune cell types express IL18Rα. IL18Rβ is commonly expressed on T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and other myeloid cells (27, 28). Thus, adoptive transfer of IL18-secreting T cells could enhance the activity of T cells while modulating the tumor microenvironment.

CAR T-cell function has been augmented by IL12 and IL18 cytokine secretion, with IL12 under the control of an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element to limit toxicities (29–31). The pmel-1 TCR transgenic murine melanoma model has been used to show that IL12 enhances T-cell function when combined with a lymphodepleting preconditioning regimen (32–34). Using a syngeneic and xenograft melanoma model, we show that expression of IL18 in TCR-modified T cells provides a potent and durable proinflammatory signal to activate T cells and enhance T-cell persistence and antitumor efficacy demonstrating that antitumor efficacy of TCR-modified T cells is optimized through engineering with IL18.

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, R.J. Brentjens.

Mice were bred and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY). Wild-type C57BL/6, pmel-1[B6.Cg-Thy1^a/CyTg(TcraTcrb)8Rest/J], CD80/86^−/− (B6.129S4-CD80^tm1Shr Cd86^tm2Shr/J), IL18R^−/− (B6.129P2-Il18r1^tm1Aki/J), and NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdc^scidIL2rg^tm1Wjl/SzJ) mice were purchased from Jackson laboratories. Six- to 8-week-old gender-matched mice challenged with tumor were measured with calipers to confirm equal tumor load and randomized to different treatment groups one day before treatment. Mice were euthanized when tumor growth led to a volume greater than 1,000mm³ by |V\ = \ ( {\frac{\pi }{6}} )( {a{b^2}} )$| where a is the longest length and b is the shortest length. The investigator was blinded when assessing the outcome.

Phoenix-ECO packaging cells (catalog no. CRL-3214) purchased from ATCC and 293 galv9 packaging cells (courtesy of the Sadelain lab, MSKCC, New York, NY) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS nonessential amino acids, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The B16F10 cell line, a kind gift from Dr. Jedd Wolchok (MSKCC, New York, NY) in 2016, and A375 and SK-Mel5 human melanoma lines, a kind gift from Dr. David Scheinberg (MSKCC, New York, NY) in 2018, were modified to express GFP-firefly luciferase for killing assays. Cell lines were kept in culture for up to 2 months. All tumor cell lines were maintained in RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, nonessential amino acids, 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, 10 mmol/L HEPES, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 11 mmol/L glucose, and 2 μmol/L 2-mercaptoethanol. Cell lines were not reauthenticated in the past year but were routinely tested for potential Mycoplasma contamination with Lonza MycoAlert Detection Kit (LT07-318).

Plasmids encoding the mCD19t construct in the SFG γ-retroviral vector (35) were used to transfect gpg29 fibroblasts (H29) with the ProFection Mammalian Transfection System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions to generate vesicular stomatitis virus G-glycoprotein–pseudotyped retroviral supernatants. These retroviral supernatants were used to construct stable Moloney murine leukemia virus–pseudotyped retroviral particle-producing Phoenix-ECO cell lines or 293 galv9 cell lines. The SFG-mCD19t, SFG-mCD19tmIL12, and SFG-mCD19tmIL18 vector were constructed by restriction enzyme digest using the cDNA of mCD19 protein truncated to exclude the intracellular domain alone or with either the fusion gene encoding murine IL12 (mIL12; refs. 29, 30, 36; provided by Dr. Alan Houghton and Dr. Jedd Wolchok, MSKCC, New York, NY) or the mature form of murine IL18 (mIL18). mIL12 was preceded by an IRES element and mIL18 was preceded by a picornavirus 2a element (P2A) self-cleaving peptide. For xenograft experiments, an optimized NY-ESO-1–directed TCR, 1G4, α- and β-chain sequence was provided by the Klebanoff Lab (37–39) and cloned into the SFG γ-retroviral vector alone or in combination with an equine 2A element followed by a signal peptide and the mature, processed form of human IL18 (hIL18). Nucleotide sequences are provided in Supplementary Fig. S1.

Mice were euthanized and their spleens were harvested. Following tissue dissociation and red blood cell lysis, T cells were activated with CD3/CD28 Dynabeads at a bead:cell ratio of 1:2 (Invitrogen). Cells were expanded in vitro by culturing in RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, nonessential amino acids, 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, 10 mmol/L HEPES, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 11 mmol/L glucose, 2 μmol/L 2-mercaptoethanol, and 100 IU/mL of recombinant human IL2 (Prometheus Therapeutics & Diagnostics). 24 and 48 hours after initial expansion, T cells were spinoculated with viral supernatant collected from Phoenix-ECO cells as described previously (40). Human T cells were activated and transduced as described previously (41). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from leukopacks (New York Blood Center, New York, NY), activated with 2 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin and 100 IU/mL of IL2, and cultured in RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin for 2 days prior to transduction. 48 and 72 hours after initial expansion, murine and human T cells were transduced by centrifugation on RetroNectin (Takara Clontech) plates with retroviral supernatant from viral packaging cells.

Cytolytic capacity of murine and human T cells was assessed through luciferase killing assay (42). 5 × 10⁴ target tumor cells expressing firefly luciferase were cocultured with adoptively transferred T cells at various effector-to-target ratios in triplicates in black-walled 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a total volume of 200 μL of cell media. Target cells alone were plated at the same cell density to determine the maximal luciferase expression as a reference (max signal). 24 hours later, 75 ng of d-Luciferin (Gold Biotechnology) dissolved in 5 μL of PBS was added to each well. Emitted luminescence of each sample (sample signal) was detected in a Spark plate reader (Tecan) and quantified using the SparkControl software (Tecan). Percent lysis was determined as [1 – (sample signal/max signal)] × 100.

5 × 10⁴ B16F10 GFP/ffLuc were cocultured at a 1:1 ratio with 5 × 10⁴ Thy1.1⁺ T cells excised from tumors on day 6 and day 13 post T-cell infusion and sorting via FACS, in a total volume of 200 μL of cell media. Target cells alone were plated at the same cell density to determine the maximal luciferase expression as a reference (max signal). 24 hours later, 75 ng of D-Luciferin (Gold Biotechnology) dissolved in 50 μL of PBS was added to each well. Emitted luminescence of each sample (sample signal) was detected in a Spark plate reader (Tecan) and quantified using the SparkControl software (Tecan). Percent lysis was determined as [1 – (sample signal/max signal)] × 100.

For syngeneic tumor studies, C57BL/6 mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5 × 10⁵ B16F10 melanoma tumor cells on day 10. On day 1, tumors were measured with calipers and mice with equal tumor burden were selected for treatment. Mice were then randomized into different treatment cohorts and on days 0, 7, and 14, mice were treated with 5 × 10⁶ T cells intravenously. For irradiation studies, the above protocol was followed in addition to sublethally irradiating the tumor-bearing mice with 5 Gy total body irradiation on day 1. For xenograft tumor studies, 5 × 10⁶ A375 (NY-ESO-1⁺) tumor cells were injected subcutaneously into NSG mice on day 10 and then treated with 2.5 × 10⁶ adoptively transferred human T cells intravenously on day 0.

5 × 10⁶ armored or control modified pmel-1 T cells were infused and either 6 or 13 days after T-cell infusion, tumor samples were excised on days 6 and 13 post T-cell infusion and mechanically dissociated using a 150 μmol/L metal mesh and glass pestle in 2.5% FBS/PBS and passed through a 100 μmol/L cell strainer. The homogenate was spun down at 1,500 RPM for 5 minutes at 4°C to pellet the cells. Cells were counted and an aliquot was stained for flow cytometry analysis. For the remaining sample, red blood cell lysis was achieved with an ACK (Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium) Lysing Buffer (Lonza). The cells were washed with PBS, FACS sorted, and used for subsequent analyses.

To analyze in vitro and ex vivo T-cell cytokine production, T cells and antigen-positive tumor cells were cocultured in a 1:1 ratio for 24 hours in a 96-well round-bottom plate in 200 μL of media. The supernatant was collected and analyzed for cytokines on a Luminex IS100 instrument. Luminex FlexMap3D system and Luminex Xponent 4.2 (Millipore Corporation) were used to detect cytokines.

Whole blood was collected from mice and serum was prepared by allowing the blood to clot during centrifugation at 14,000 RPM for 30 minutes at 4°C. Red blood cell lysis was achieved with an ACK (Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium) Lysing Buffer (Lonza). T cells were washed with PBS and used for subsequent flow cytometry analysis. Serum was analyzed for cytokines with Luminex.

To assess CD80 and CD86 surface expression on tumor cells, the cells were collected, surface stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry.

Flow cytometric analyses were performed using 10-color Gallios B43618 (Beckman Coulter) and 14-color Attune NxT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) instruments to acquire data. Data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star). DAPI (0.5 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) or a LIVE/DEAD fixable yellow fluorescent dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to exclude dead cells in all experiments. Flow cytometry gating strategies are provided in Supplementary Fig. S2. Antibodies to the following mouse proteins were used for flow cytometry: CD3ϵ (eBioscience, clone 145-2C11), CD3 (BioLegend, 17A2), CD4 (eBioscience, GK1.5), CD4 (eBioscience, RM4-5), CD8α (eBioscience, 53-6.7), CD11b (eBioscience, M1/70), CD11c (eBioscience, N418), CD19 (eBioscience, eBio1D3), CD25 (eBioscience, PC61.5), CD44 (eBioscience, IM7), CD45 (BioLegend, 30-F11), CD62L (Invitrogen, MEL-14), CD80 (eBioscience, 16-10A1), CD86 (eBioscience, GL1), CD90.1 (Thy-1.1; Invitrogen, HIS51), CD206 (Invitrogen, MR5D3), CD218a (IL18R; eBioscience, P3TUNYA), CD223 (Lag-3; eBioscience, C9B7W), CD279 (PD-1; Invitrogen, J43), CD366 (TIM3; Invitrogen, 8B.2C12), F4/80 (eBioscience, BM8), FoxP3 (eBioscience, FJK-16s), Ly-6C (eBioscience, HK1.4), Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1; eBioscience, RB6-8C5), MHC Class II I-Ab (Invitrogen, AF6-120.1), and NK1.1 (eBioscience, PK136). Antibodies to the following human proteins were used for flow cytometry: CD3 [Invitrogen, clone S4.1 (7D6)], CD4 (eBioscience, OKT4), CD8 (BioLegend, SK1), CD80 (Invitrogen, MEM-233), CD86 (Invitrogen, BU63), HLA-A2 (Invitrogen, BB7.2), and HLA-A*02:01 NY-ESO-1 (SLLMWITQC) iTAg Tetramer (MBL). Quantification of total cell numbers by flow cytometry was done using 123count eBeads Counting Beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Staining of Foxp3 was done using the Foxp3/Transcription factor staining buffer set from eBioscience. All antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, BD Biosciences, eBioscience, Invitrogen, or MBL. Sorting of splenocytes after tissue processing was done using a BD FACSAria under sterile conditions.

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad). Data points represent biological replicates and are shown as the mean ± SEM or mean ± SD as indicated in the figure legends. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student t test, one-way ANOVA, or two-way ANOVA as indicated in the figure legends. Mann–Whitney test was used to determine statistical significance for tumor volume growth curves. The log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used to determine statistical significance for overall survival in mouse survival experiments. Significance was assumed with *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; and ^****, P < 0.0001.

All experiments were performed in accordance with the MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)–approved protocol guidelines (MSKCC #00-05-065).

Retroviral constructs were generated to armor tumor-specific pmel-1 T cells with proinflammatory cytokines in a syngeneic murine system. Bicistronic constructs were created with a truncated version of murine CD19 (mCD19t) protein to assess transduction efficiency and either a murine IL12 α and β subunit fusion protein (mIL12; ref. 36) or a bioreactive mature version of mIL18 to provide constitutive IL12 or IL18 expression by the long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter (Fig. 1A). Previous work has shown that IL12 secretion after an IRES element limits toxicities (30, 29). Gene transfer of each construct into murine T cells was equivalent (Supplementary Fig. S3A). mCD19tmIL12 and mCD19tmIL18 pmel-1 T cells secreted mIL12 and mIL18, respectively (Fig. 1B).

We next investigated activation and effector function of cytokine-armored pmel-1 T cells through analysis of IFNγ secretion, expression of T-cell activation marker CD25, and cytolytic capacity of the transduced T cells after coculture with B16F10 murine melanoma cells. B16F10 cells were negative for costimulatory molecules CD80/CD86 (Supplementary Fig. S3B). Following coculture with B16F10 tumor cells, mIL12- and mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells displayed enhanced secretion of IFNγ (Fig. 1C) and expression of CD25 (Fig. 1D). mIL12 secretion improved the in vitro cytolytic capacity of pmel-1 T cells against B16F10 tumor cells modified to express GFP/luciferase (B16F10 GFP/luc) relative to mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells and control pmel-1 T cells modified with mCD19t alone (Fig. 1E). mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells also enhanced in vitro antitumor lysis compared with control pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 1E). These results indicate that both mIL12 and mIL18 augment pmel-1 T-cell activation and effector function in vitro.

C57BL6 mice were inoculated subcutaneously with B16F10 tumor cells and treated weekly for three total infusions with either control or armored pmel-1 T cells to determine T-cell antitumor responses (Fig. 2A). Mice treated with mIL12- or mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells had a significant delay in tumor growth in comparison with control pmel-1 T cell–treated mice as assessed by tumor volume (Fig. 2B). Mice treated with mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells were also able to delay tumor growth when compared with mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cell–treated mice (Fig. 2B). mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells enhanced overall survival of tumor-bearing mice without preconditioning therapy or exogenous cytokine treatments when compared with mice treated with either mIL12-armored or control pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 2C). The enhanced antitumor effect of the IL18-armored pmel-1 T cells was also evident in tumor-bearing mice treated with a single infusion of pmel-1 T cells (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Tumor samples were isolated from each cohort of treated mice 6 days after a single T-cell infusion for flow cytometric tumor microenvironment analysis. Although there was no difference in the total number of macrophages in the tumor samples among treatment groups (Supplementary Fig. S4B), tumors from mice that received either mIL18- or mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells had fewer immunosuppressive CD206⁺ M2 macrophages (Fig. 2D; Supplementary Fig. S4C). Only the mice treated with mIL18-secreting armored pmel-1 T cells had significantly fewer CD11b⁺, Ly6C⁺ myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in the tumor samples (Fig. 2E; Supplementary Fig. S4C). There was also a significant accumulation of activated MHCII⁺ dendritic cells in the tumors of mice treated with mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells in comparison with the mIL12-armored or control pmel-1 T-cell groups (Fig. 2F; Supplementary Fig. S4C). The decrease in suppressive immune populations within the tumor microenvironment of mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells was associated with an enhanced accumulation of pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 2G; Supplementary Fig. S4C) and suggests an explanation for mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cell–mediated control of B16F10 tumors.

To determine the dependency of the enhanced anti-tumor T-cell response upon endogenous CD28 costimulation, we tested the same tumor model in CD80/CD86^−/− host mice. Nonpreconditioned, tumor-bearing CD80/CD86^−/− mice treated with mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells had a slower rate of tumor growth (Fig. 2H) and significantly enhanced survival (Fig. 2I) in comparison with the mIL12-armored and the control pmel-1 T cells. There was no difference in tumor growth or survival between wild-type C57BL6 or CD80/CD86^−/− tumor-bearing host mice treated with mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells. Thus, IL18 enhanced the efficacy of T-cell therapy in a syngeneic in vivo system without preconditioning therapy and irrespective of CD28 T-cell costimulation.

We next investigated activation and ex vivo functionality of tumor-specific T cells. Thy1.1⁻ host mice were treated with adoptively transferred Thy1.1⁺ pmel-1 T cells and tumors were dissected 6 days and 13 days post T-cell infusion (Fig. 3A). On day 6, we observed a significant increase in the ratio of Thy1.1⁺ pmel-1 to Thy1.1⁻ endogenous T cells only in the mCD19tmIL18 treatment group, indicating an accumulation of mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells in the tumor not observed in the mice that were treated with mIL12 or the control pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 3B). There was no difference, however, in naïve/effector/central memory T-cell phenotype among the three treatment groups at the time of infusion or on days 6 or 13 after treatment (Supplementary Fig. S5A). There was no difference in the percentage of PD-1⁺, Thy1.1⁺ pmel-1 T cells, illustrating activation of both armored and control pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 3C; Supplementary Fig. S5B). On day 6 after infusion, tumor-infiltrating mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells had a significantly lower percentage of cells that were triple positive for the inhibitory markers PD-1, TIM-3, and LAG-3 than mIL12-armored pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 3D; Supplementary Fig. S5B). A triple-positive phenotype is a marker of T-cell dysfunction (43). Next we analyzed the CD8⁺ effector to CD4⁺ helper T-cell ratio in the tumors of mice 6 or 13 days after T-cell treatment. On day 6, there was no difference between the ratio of CD8⁺ to CD4⁺ T cells in the tumors of mIL12 and mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells. On day 13, the ratio of CD8⁺ to CD4⁺ T cells was higher in tumors of mIL18 pmel-1 T cell–treated mice (Fig. 3E; Supplementary Fig. S5C). Thus, mIL18-secreting CD8⁺ pmel-1 T cells retain a functional phenotype and persist at the tumor site after infusion. Conversely, mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells develop a dysfunctional phenotype in vivo when compared with control or mIL18-armored pmel-1 T cells.

We analyzed the function of tumor-infiltrating pmel-1 T cells on days 6 and 13 by assessing the cytokine production and cytolytic capacity of sorted Thy1.1⁺ T cells ex vivo. On day 6 after T-cell therapy, both the mIL12 and mIL18 transduced pmel-1 T cells secreted IFNγ in comparison with the control pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 3F). On day 13, only the mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells were able to produce more IFNγ than the control or the mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 3G). Both mIL12 and mIL18 pmel-1 T cells were able to lyse B16F10 GFP/Luc tumor cells on day 6, but only the mIL18 pmel-1 T cells maintained this ability on day 13 (Fig. 3H; Supplementary Fig. S5D). These data align with the phenotypic results described in Fig. 3B–E and demonstrate that mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells functionally persist in the tumor longer than the mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells, which become dysfunctional.

Although IL18 provides an activating signal and enhances function, persistence, and antitumor efficacy of tumor-specific T cells, long-term survival of mice treated with mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells was modest. We hypothesized that combination with sublethal irradiation would have an additive effect and increase survival of tumor-bearing mice due to removal of suppressive cell populations. Sublethally irradiated B16F10 tumor-bearing mice received a single armored or control pmel-1 T-cell injection (Fig. 4A). All T-cell groups displayed equivalent mean fluorescence intensity of mCD19t prior to infusion, demonstrating similar vector expression (Supplementary Fig. S6A). The combination of sublethal irradiation and armored mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells regressed the tumors, which were eradicated completely in 8/9 mice (88.8%; Fig. 4B). When sublethal irradiation of tumor-bearing mice was accompanied with three weekly injections of pmel-1 T cells, mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells eradicated established subcutaneous tumors (Supplementary Fig. S6B–S6D). In contrast, mice treated with mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells in combination with sublethal irradiation succumbed abruptly to toxicity even with mIL12 placed after an IRES element, a strategy meant to limit toxicity (ref. 29; Fig. 4B). Thus, only mice sublethally irradiated and treated with mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells survived long term (Fig. 4C).

To confirm that we were observing IL12 toxicity as described previously (25), we analyzed serum cytokines via retro-orbital bleeds from the sublethally irradiated, tumor-bearing mice one week after treatment with the armored or control pmel-1 T cells. The sublethally irradiated, tumor-bearing mice treated with mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells had significantly higher amounts of IL12, IFNγ, TNFα, IL6, and IL10 in serum in comparison with those mice treated with control mCD19t- or mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells (Fig. 4D). On the basis of this cytokine profile, we determined that these mice succumbed to toxicity related to IL12 administration. Taking into consideration both the phenotypic data suggesting that IL18 remains functional for a longer duration as well as the toxicity that developed in sublethally irradiated mice treated with IL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells, we focused further investigation on IL18-secreting T cells.

The enhanced antitumor effect from the combination of pmel-1 T cells with sublethal irradiation was hypothesized to be due to a decrease in suppressive immune cell populations. When compared with the tumors of unconditioned host mice, both CD25⁺, FOXP3⁺ regulatory T cells (T_reg) and CD11b⁺, Ly6G⁺ granulocytic MDSCs in the tumors of sublethally irradiated host mice treated with either control pmel-1 T cells or mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells were a significantly decreased (Fig. 4E and F; Supplementary Fig. S6E). Although changes in tumor microenvironment were similar in control and mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells, a greater number of Thy1.1⁺ pmel-1 T cells were detected within the tumors of unconditioned and sublethally irradiated mIL18 pmel-1 T cell–treated mice in comparison with control pmel-1 T cell–treated mice (Fig. 4G; Supplementary Fig. S6E). The elimination of suppressive immune populations in the tumors of the mIL18 pmel-1 T cell–treated mice with and without sublethal irradiation allowed for enhanced engraftment and persistence of pmel-1 T cells.

Given the antitumor efficacy of mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells combined with sublethal irradiation, we postulated that IL18 was acting in cis on adoptively transferred T cells to mediate an immune response. We generated pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− mice as a source of donor T cells by crossing pmel-1 and IL18R^−/− mice (Fig. 5A). Next, we confirmed via flow cytometry that there was no IL18 receptor present on the naïve pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− donor T cells, even after activation with supernatant from IL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells, which induces IL18 receptor expression (Fig. 5B). The lack of IL18R did not affect the retroviral transduction efficiency of either the control mCD19t or armored mCD19tmIL18 retroviral constructs in both pmel-1 and pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− T cells (Fig. 5C). mIL18 secretion improved the in vitro cytolytic capacity of only pmel-1 T cells against B16F10 GFP/luc tumor cells relative to control pmel-1 T cells as well as pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− T cells modified with either mIL18 or mCD19t (Supplementary Fig. S7A). This result demonstrated the cis effect of IL18 in augmenting in vitro T-cell antitumor efficacy.

We asked whether the improved in vivo survival of tumor-bearing mice and enhanced antitumor function of mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells was dependent on donor T cell or host IL18R expression. In the B16F10 tumor model, both pmel-1 and pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− transduced donor T cells were used to treat C57BL6 or IL18R^−/− tumor-bearing host mice (Fig. 5D). mIL18-secreting pmel-1 donor T cells delayed tumor progression and enhanced overall survival in both C57BL6 and IL18R^−/− tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 5E and F). In contrast, the mIL18-secreting pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− donor T cells did not cause tumorregression or prolong survival, similarly to control pmel and pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− treated mice (Fig. 5E and F; Supplementary Fig. S7B and S7C). Antitumor activity is improved regardless of whether IL18R is expressed on the endogenous host immune cells when the mIL18-secreting donor T cell has an intact IL18 receptor. Thus, cis interactions between the secreted IL18 and the adoptively transferred T cells are necessary for enhancing antitumor activity.

To demonstrate translational relevance of armoring TCR T cells with IL18, we transduced HLA-A2⁺ human T cells to express a NY-ESO-1–specific TCR, 1G4, or both the TCR and a mature, bioactive version of hIL18, 1G4hIL18 (Fig. 6A). 1G4 and 1G4hIL18 T cells had similar retroviral transduction efficiency (Supplementary Fig. S8A). 1G4hIL18 T cells significantly enhanced secretion of hIL18 in contrast to mock-transduced and 1G4 T cells (Fig. 6B). After coculture with A375 (HLA-A2⁺, NY-ESO-1⁺) human melanoma cells, both 1G4 and 1G4hIL18 T cells showed enhanced secretion of IFNγ and IL2, demonstrating activation of the transduced T cells (Fig. 6C). Both 1G4 and 1G4hIL18 T cells enhanced cell lysis in comparison with mock-transduced T cells when cocultured with A375 tumor cells but not against SK-Mel5 (HLA-A2⁺, NY-ESO-1⁻) tumor cells (Fig. 6D). To confirm this interaction in vivo, we utilized an A375 xenograft model of human melanoma and treated with transduced HLA-A2⁺ human T cells (Fig. 6E). A375 tumor cells lacked both CD80 and CD86 costimulatory molecules (Supplementary Fig. S8B). Seven days after T-cell infusion, more 1G4hIL18 T cells were present in peripheral blood of the tumor-bearing mice in comparison with both the 1G4 or mock T cell–treated mice (Fig. 6F). 1G4hIL18 T cells delayed tumor progression in comparison with 1G4 and mock-transduced T cells (Fig. 6G). Both 1G4 and 1G4hIL18 T cells enhanced the survival of tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 6H), although the effect was stronger with 1G4hIL18 T cells, showing that IL18 provides a proinflammatory signal to activate human T cells and augment antitumor efficacy through increased persistence of TCR-modified T cells.

Adoptive cellular therapy with TCR-modified T cells promises to expand the range of targetable tumor-associated antigens, although this strategy has shown only modest success (12–17). Because treatment failure correlates with a lack of T-cell activation, new methods to stimulate tumor-targeted T cells are necessary. In this study, we demonstrated that IL18 provides a proinflammatory signal to T cells. IL18-engineered TCR-modified T cells promote an enhanced and persistent effector T-cell response by augmenting in vitro activation, cytokine release, and tumor lysis of tumor-directed T cells. IL18 promotes a durable activating signal to tumor-specific T cells in both syngeneic and xenograft tumor models. TCR-modified T cells secreting IL18 exhibited enhanced persistence and mediated a delay in tumor growth corresponding to long-term survival of tumor-bearing mice in the absence of any preconditioning therapy by acting in cis to enhance the effector function of tumor-specific T cells and promote an immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment.

The survival benefit of mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells may be due to the reduction of repressive CD206⁺ M2 macrophages and MDSCs. The immune microenvironment was conducive to the accumulation of activated dendritic cells and expansion of tumor-specific pmel-1 T cells. This result mirrors that of IL18-secreting CAR T cells which promote a proinflammatory microenvironment with M1 macrophages and activated dendritic cells (31). While IL18 secretion generates a stimulatory tumor microenvironment, the main contribution to the enhanced efficacy of the IL18-secreting TCR-modified T cells is conferred by IL18 acting in cis on adoptively transferred T cells. Tumor-specific pmel-1 T cells armored with mIL18 functionally persist at the tumor site longer than mIL12-armored pmel-1 T cells that become dysfunctional. Ex vivo cytokine secretion and cytolytic assays illustrate that mIL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells remain activated and retain effector function for at least a week longer than mIL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells.

Utilizing pmel^+/+, IL18R^−/− donor mice, we established that expression of IL18R on adoptively transferred T cells supports IL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells, regardless of IL18R expression on the endogenous host immune cells. This confirms our hypothesis that the cis interactions between the secreted IL18 and the adoptively transferred T cells are essential for enhancing antitumor activity. Although we believe that the cis effect of IL18 on the IL18R on adoptively transferred T cells confers the primary antitumor effect, effector cytokines upregulated in the periphery such as IL12, IFNγ, and TNFα may play a role in decreasing the suppressive M2 macrophage and MDSC populations. IL12 modulates the murine tumor microenvironment by reducing the number of MDSCs and suppressive macrophages at the tumor site (32). Both IFNγ and TNFα proinflammatory cytokines polarize macrophages into a M1-activated phenotype (44–46). From our studies, we have shown that IL18-secreting murine T cells increase the amount of IFNγ and TNFα in the periphery, which could be a mechanism by which IL18-secreting T cells polarize macrophages into M1 activated rather than a M2 suppressive phenotype. Any indirect mechanism of suppressive cell depletion may be complementary to the cis effect of IL18 on the IL18R on adoptively transferred T cells. The combination of in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo data demonstrate that secretion of IL18 modulates the tumor microenvironment and provides a more durable proinflammatory signal than IL12 to enhance the antitumor effector function of tumor-specific T cells.

These results with IL18-armored pmel-1 T cells in unconditioned tumor-bearing mice are in contrast to those from other groups which observed modest efficacy of inducible IL18-secreting pmel-1 T cells following multiple methods of chemotherapeutic preconditioning (47) or enhanced toxicity of IL12-armored tumor-specific pmel-1 T cells unless they are under the control of an inducible promoter (33, 47–49). Specifically, a study by Kunert and colleagues, established that T cells transduced with a gp100-specific TCR in combination with an inducible IL18 gene led to antitumor responses in over half of the mice treated when provided in the context of both bisulfan and cyclophosphamide preconditioning regimens (47). In our studies, pmel-1 T cells transduced to constitutively secrete IL18 combined with sublethal irradiation alone eradicated established tumors in a syngeneic tumor model. This antitumor response was correlated with tumor microenvironment modulation through the ablation of repressive MDSCs and regulatory T cells as well as enhanced engraftment and persistence of tumor-specific T cells within the tumor. In this manner, sublethal irradiation generated a tumor microenvironment devoid of immunosuppressive populations. This suppressive immune cell ablation may augment the stimulatory cis interactions of IL18-secreting T cells, leading to this antitumor response. Toxicity was not associated with the IL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells in immune-competent mice. However, after sublethal irradiation preconditioning, we observed fatal toxicity to mice in the form of elevated serum cytokine amounts. Increased IFNγ and IL6 has been attributed to cytokine release syndrome toxicities in patients (50) and may have been the effector cytokines that caused the death of the sublethally irradiated mice treated with IL12-secreting pmel-1 T cells.

The syngeneic tumor model data show that TCR-modified T-cell antitumor efficacy can be optimized safely through armoring with IL18 rather than with IL12 and establish IL18 as a superior and safer proinflammatory signal to tumor-directed T cells. These syngeneic studies were used as a proof-of-principle to engineer IL18-armored TCR-modified T cells in a clinically relevant human TCR system. Human T cells were transduced with an anti-NY-ESO-1 TCR. They were then validated and ultimately armored with hIL18. 1G4hIL18 TCR T cells were further shown to persist and enhance antitumor efficacy resulting in long-term survival of tumor-bearing mice in a xenograft model. The NY-ESO-1–directed TCR has been tested in various clinical trials with only modest success (14, 51, 52). Our results provide a rationale for the clinical application of IL18-armored TCR-modified T cells to enhance the efficacy and potency of TCR-modified T-cell therapies.

D.J. Drakes has ownership interest in a patent. C.A. Klebanoff is a scientific advisory board member for Achilles Therapeutics, Aleta Biotherapeutics, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Obsidian Therapeutics, and Kelun Pharmaceuticals; is a consultant for G1 Therapeutics and Roche/Genetech; reports receiving commercial research grants from Kite/Gilead and Intima Bioscience; and has ownership interest (including patents) in MSKCC. R.J. Brentjens repors receiving grant support from JUNO Therapeutics (a Bristol-Myers Squibb company); is a consultant/advisor for Gracell Biotechnologies, Inc.; and has ownership interest (including patents) in IL18. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design: D.J. Drakes, S. Rafiq, C.A. Klebanoff, R.J. Brentjens

Development of methodology: D.J. Drakes, S. Rafiq, R.J. Brentjens

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): D.J. Drakes, T.J. Purdon, S.S. Chandran, R.J. Brentjens

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): D.J. Drakes, S. Rafiq, C.A. Klebanoff, R.J. Brentjens

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: D.J. Drakes, S. Rafiq, C.A. Klebanoff, R.J. Brentjens

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): D.J. Drakes, A.V. Lopez, C.A. Klebanoff, R.J. Brentjens

Study supervision: D.J. Drakes, C.A. Klebanoff, R.J. Brentjens

The authors thank A. Rookard, B. Qeriqi, and C. Bebernitz for technical assistance with in vivo experiments; the MSKCC Flow Cytometry Core; J.E. Jaspers, E.L. Smith, and C. Hackett for critically reading the manuscript; and the Klebanoff, Scheinberg, and Wolchok labs for reagents. This work was supported by U.S. NIH grants 5 P01 CA190174-03 (to R.J. Brentjens), 5 P50 CA192937-02 (to R.J. Brentjens), and T32 GM073546-11 (to D.J. Drakes); The Annual Terry Fox Run for Cancer Research (to R.J. Brentjens); Kate's Team (to R.J. Brentjens); Carson Family Charitable Trust (to R.J. Brentjens); Mr. William H. Goodwin and Mrs. Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research (to R.J. Brentjens and C.A. Klebanoff); and the Experimental Therapeutics Center of MSKCC (to R.J. Brentjens, S.S. Chandran, and C.A. Klebanoff). S.S. Chandran and C.A. Klebanoff are also supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, NCI/NIH RFA-CA-18-003 R33, the Breast Cancer Alliance, The Manhasset Women's Coalition Against Breast Cancer, and the MSKCC Core Grant P30 CA008748.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.