High levels of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) are detected in more than 85% of human cancers. Immunologic analysis supports that hTERT is a widely applicable target recognized by T cells and can be potentially studied as a broad cancer immunotherapeutic, or a unique line of defense against tumor recurrence. There remains an urgent need to develop more potent hTERT vaccines. Here, a synthetic highly optimized full-length hTERT DNA vaccine (phTERT) was designed and the induced immunity was examined in mice and non-human primates (NHP). When delivered by electroporation, phTERT elicited strong, broad hTERT-specific CD8 T-cell responses including induction of T cells expressing CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α in mice. The ability of phTERT to overcome tolerance was evaluated in an NHP model, whose TERT is 96% homologous to that of hTERT. Immunized monkeys exhibited robust [average 1,834 spot forming unit (SFU)/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)], diverse (multiple immunodominant epitopes) IFN-γ responses and antigen-specific perforin release (average 332 SFU/106 PBMCs), suggesting that phTERT breaks tolerance and induces potent cytotoxic responses in this human-relevant model. Moreover, in an HPV16-associated tumor model, vaccination of phTERT slows tumor growth and improves survival rate in both prophylactic and therapeutic studies. Finally, in vivo cytotoxicity assay confirmed that phTERT-induced CD8 T cells exhibited specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity, capable of eliminating hTERT-pulsed target cells. These findings support that this synthetic electroporation-delivered DNA phTERT may have a role as a broad therapeutic cancer vaccine candidate. Cancer Immunol Res; 1(3); 179–89. ©2013 AACR.

Immunotherapy for cancer through induction of antitumor cellular immunity has recently reemerged as an important experimental therapy for the treatment of nonresponsive cancers. However, most tumor-associated antigens (TAA) are expressed in one or a few tumor types as tumors generally exhibit tissue-specific features (1). In contrast, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), a catalytic subunit of telomerase, is highly expressed in more than 85% of human tumors from diverse cancer phenotypes, with little or no expression in normal somatic cells (2–6). Expression of hTERT correlates with telomerase activity, which may be a requirement for tumor survival (7). Telomerase activation/hTERT expression is associated with little loss of telomere length and accounts for the unlimited proliferative capacity of cancer cells. As expression of hTERT is directly linked to tumor cell growth and contributes crucially to the long-term survival of tumor cells, loss of telomerase activity will lead to hTERT-positive tumor cell death by apoptosis (8). In addition, targeting hTERT may have the potential to eliminate cancer stem cells as recent studies have suggested that cancer stem or stem-like cells express hTERT (9–11). These findings collectively point to hTERT as an attractive TAA and provide the basis of developing hTERT-based universal vaccine for cancer immunotherapy (12–14).

Therapeutic hTERT vaccines have been widely studied because of their potential to stimulate the killing of tumor cells by enhancing the activity of telomerase-specific cytotoxic CD8 T cells (12). Many studies have been conducted to develop hTERT peptide vaccines containing motifs that either bind to MHC class I (I540 and 572Y) or MHC class II molecules (GV1001; refs. 15–18). Moreover, multiple strategies are being explored to use full-length hTERT recombinant constructs targeting multiple CD8 and CD4 epitopes simultaneously. As a result, the potency of autologous dendritic cells transduced with hTERT mRNA (19, 20) and viral vector-based vaccines (21, 22) has been reported with partial success in animal models. However, findings from initial clinical trials of hTERT vaccines in patients with cancer have shown that these approaches suffer from limited induction of CD8+ T cells and had limited impact on overall survival (13). Therefore, there remains an urgent need to develop more potent hTERT therapeutic vaccines with a broader T-cell footprint.

Several clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of DNA vaccination against a variety of cancers (23). Although there are some indications of limited immune responses in vaccinated patients with melanoma or prostate cancer (24, 25), previous DNA vaccines generally seem to induce weak cellular immunity in humans. Recent synthetic DNA design strategies, such as codon/RNA optimization, the addition of highly efficient immunoglobulin leader sequences (26–28), use of more efficient DNA delivery methods including in vivo electroporation (29), have been applied to improve the immune responses induced by DNA vaccines in humans, with recent significant success (30). However, these new approaches have not been combined to test a new hTERT DNA vaccine.

In this report, we attempt to extend this improved immune potency to construct a synthetic DNA vaccine expressing a full-length hTERT with modifications using a combination of approaches in gene optimization. The hTERT DNA was delivered by electroporation and its immunogenicity and antitumor effect were evaluated in non-human primates (NHP) and mice. These data strongly support further study of the hTERT DNA vaccine in combination with electroporation delivery as a potential immunotherapy platform against an array of human and animal malignancies.

Immunogen design and expression

A synthetic hTERT DNA vaccine was generated using the hTERT sequence retrieved from GenBank (accession number: AF018196) with several modifications (Fig. 1A). The full-length hTERT gene was 3,512 bp and subcloned into an expression vector pGX0001.

Figure 1.

Design and expression of hTERT DNA vaccine. A, schematic of hTERT antigen. The * denotes the incorporated point mutation. B, map of phTERT. C, detection of phTERT expression by in vitro translation. The gene product was immunoprecipitated using an anti-HA (hemagglutinin) tag monoclonal antibody, visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. D, immunofluorescence assay of phTERT. Transfected rhabdomyosarcoma cells expressing hTERT protein showed typical FITC-fluorescence using a commercial hTERT (C-term) monoclonal antibody. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Figure 1.

Design and expression of hTERT DNA vaccine. A, schematic of hTERT antigen. The * denotes the incorporated point mutation. B, map of phTERT. C, detection of phTERT expression by in vitro translation. The gene product was immunoprecipitated using an anti-HA (hemagglutinin) tag monoclonal antibody, visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. D, immunofluorescence assay of phTERT. Transfected rhabdomyosarcoma cells expressing hTERT protein showed typical FITC-fluorescence using a commercial hTERT (C-term) monoclonal antibody. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Close modal

In vitro hTERT expression was detected using TNT Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (Promega). The gene product was immunoprecipitated using an anti-HA (hemagglutinin) tag monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The synthesized protein was detected by autoradiography.

An indirect immunofluorescent assay was conducted to confirm hTERT expression as previously described (31). Briefly, human rhabdomyosarcoma cells were transfected with phTERT and pGX0001 (1 μg/well) using TurboFectin8.0 Transfection Reagent (OriGene). Forty-eight hours later, the cells were fixed and incubated with anti-hTERT (C-term) monoclonal antibody (Millipore) overnight at 4°C. The slides were then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), and analyzed by fluorescent microscopy (Leica Microsystems, Inc.) using the SPOT Advanced software (SPOT Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.).

Mice studies

Mice and immunization.

Female 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Their care was in accordance with the guidelines of NIH and University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Mice were divided into two groups and immunized with 50 μg of hTERT DNA by intramuscular injection into the quadriceps followed by electroporation using the CELLECTRA adaptive constant current device (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; ref. 32). The mice received four immunizations, two weeks apart. One week after the last immunization, the mice were sacrificed and splenocytes were isolated for immunology studies.

ELISpot assay.

Mouse IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assay was conducted as previously described (31). Peptides spanning the entire hTERT protein, each containing 15 amino acids overlapping by eight amino acids, were synthesized by GenScript. The entire set of peptides was pooled at a concentration of 2 μg/mL/peptide into four pools for stimulation of the IFN-γ release.

CD8+ T-cell depletion.

CD8+ lymphocytes were depleted from splenocytes using Dynabeads mouse CD8 (Lyt2; Life Technologies). After CD8+ T cells depletion, IFN-γ ELISpot was conducted as described earlier.

Intracellular cytokine staining.

Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) was conducted as described previously (32). Briefly, splenocytes from vaccinated and naïve mice were stimulated with hTERT peptides, stained with FITC anti-mouse CD107a, and followed by ViViD Dye (Invitrogen). Cells were then stained with the following extracellular antibodies: APC-Cy7 anti-mouse CD3e, PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-mouse CD4, and APC anti-mouse CD8a (BD Biosciences). Intracellular cytokines were subsequently stained with the following antibodies: Alexa Fluor 700 anti-mouse IFN-γ and PE-Cy7 anti-mouse TNF (BD Biosciences).

Cell line.

TC-1 cell line is a well-characterized lung epithelial cell line immortalized with HPV16 E6/E7, and transformed with the c-Ha-ras oncogene (33). TC-1 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C.

In vivo tumor challenge study.

Ten female 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice were immunized with 50 μg of phTERT four times biweekly. One week after the last immunization, each mouse was challenged with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells injected subcutaneously including 10 naïve mice that served as a control. Tumors were measured twice weekly with digital calipers spanning the shortest (width) and longest surface diameters (length; ref. 34). Tumor volumes were calculated according to the formula: V = length × width2 × π/6 (35). Mice were sacrificed when tumor diameter reached 20 mm in compliance with our IACUC protocol.

In vivo tumor treatment study.

Female C57BL/6 mice were separated into two groups of 10 mice: naïve and hTERT group. On day 0, all mice were injected subcutaneously with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells in the right flank. All mice in the hTERT group were immunized with 50 μg of phTERT on days 3, 10, 17, and 24. Tumors measurement was conducted as described earlier.

In vivo cytotoxicity study.

An in vivo cytotoxicity assay was conducted as previously described (36, 37). Splenocytes from naïve mice were stained with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) at a concentration of 1 μmol/L or 1 nmol/L. CFSEhi (1 μmol/L)–labeled cells were pulsed with the relevant peptides (hTERT peptides), whereas CFSElo (1 nmol/L)–labeled cells were pulsed with the irrelevant peptides (HPV6 E6/E7 peptides). Equal frequency of CFSEhi and CFSElo cells was combined and 107 cells were intravenously injected into naïve or phTERT-immunized mice. Forty-eight hours later, splenocytes were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage killing was calculated as follows: 100 − [(% relevant peptide pulsed in immunized/% irrelevant peptide pulsed in immunized)/(% relevant peptide pulsed in naïve/% irrelevant peptide pulsed in naïve)] × 100.

Rhesus monkey studies

Immunization and PBMC isolation.

Four rhesus macaques were vaccinated with phTERT, four times intramuscularly followed by electroporation using CELLECTRA adaptive constant current electroporation device, 6 weeks apart, at 2 mg DNA/each immunization. Blood was collected 2 weeks after each immunization and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by standard Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation.

IFN-γ and perforin ELISpot assay.

Monkey IFN-γ and perforin ELISpot were conducted as previously described (38, 39). Antigen-specific responses were determined by subtracting the number of spots in the negative control wells from the wells containing peptides. After subtracting the negative control, the mean value in the wells with the PBMCs collected postvaccination had to exceed 50 SFU/106 PBMCs and be at least four times higher than prevaccination reactivity to be considered as a positive response.

Statistical analysis.

Standard and paired Student t tests were applied to analyze statistical significance of all quantitative data produced in this study, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Design and construction of the full-length hTERT DNA vaccine

As indicated in Fig. 1A, the hTERT immunogen was developed with several modifications, including codon/RNA optimization and the addition of a highly efficient leader sequence, to enhance the expression and immunogenicity of phTERT. Two mutations (R589Y and D1005Y) were incorporated into the hTERT sequence to assist in breaking tolerance (40). The modified gene was subcloned into pGX0001 and named as phTERT for further study (Fig. 1B)

Expression of hTERT

In vitro expression of hTERT was verified by T7 coupled transcription and translation reaction. After immunoprecipitation with the anti-HA tag monoclonal antibody, hTERT expression was analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. The hTERT protein migrated to the corresponding molecular weight at approximately 130 kDa (Fig. 1C). No protein band was detected in the pGX0001 vector lane. An indirect immunofluorescence assay was conducted to further confirm hTERT expression. As shown in Fig. 1D, the cells expressing hTERT protein showed typical FITC-fluorescence, supporting the expression of hTERT in a relatively native conformation. As a control, expression was not detected in pGX0001-transfected cells.

Vaccination with phTERT induces strong CD8-mediated hTERT-specific responses in mice

IFN-γ ELISpot was conducted to assess antigen-specific cellular immune responses induced by phTERT after four immunizations (Fig. 2A). The total response against four pools of hTERT peptides in phTERT-immunized mice was 1,817 ± 211 SFU/106 splenocytes, which was significantly greater than the immune responses in the naïve group (20 ± 6 SFU/106 splenocytes; P = 0.01; Fig. 2B). The C-terminus of the hTERT protein (peptide pool 4) was the most immunogenic region, accounting for about half the response elicited by phTERT (970 ± 113 SFU/106 splenocytes).

Figure 2.

phTERT elicited robust CD8+ immune response in C57BL/6 mice. A, immunization schedule. B, total IFN-γ responses induced by phTERT. Frequencies of IFN-γ–secreting cells/106 splenocytes after four immunizations with phTERT were determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay. Splenocytes from each mouse (10 mice/group) were stimulated with hTERT peptides. Results were presented as mean ± SEM. C, total IFN-γ responses induced by phTERT after CD8 depletion. CD8 T cells were depleted from splenocytes and IFN-γ ELISpot assay was conducted. D, schematic diagram of gating strategy of ICS. E, secretion of CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α postvaccination in both CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Splenocytes were stimulated with hTERT peptides for 5 hours before surface and intracellular staining. Background-subtracted percentages of hTERT-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cells producing CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were calculated. The experiment shown is representative of three different experiments using 5 mice per group.

Figure 2.

phTERT elicited robust CD8+ immune response in C57BL/6 mice. A, immunization schedule. B, total IFN-γ responses induced by phTERT. Frequencies of IFN-γ–secreting cells/106 splenocytes after four immunizations with phTERT were determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay. Splenocytes from each mouse (10 mice/group) were stimulated with hTERT peptides. Results were presented as mean ± SEM. C, total IFN-γ responses induced by phTERT after CD8 depletion. CD8 T cells were depleted from splenocytes and IFN-γ ELISpot assay was conducted. D, schematic diagram of gating strategy of ICS. E, secretion of CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α postvaccination in both CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Splenocytes were stimulated with hTERT peptides for 5 hours before surface and intracellular staining. Background-subtracted percentages of hTERT-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cells producing CD107a, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were calculated. The experiment shown is representative of three different experiments using 5 mice per group.

Close modal

Another ELISpot assay was conducted after CD8+ T-cell depletion to determine whether CD8+ cells were responsible for the detected robust IFN-γ responses. The results indicated that the spot number was reduced to 244 ± 78 in the phTERT-vaccinated mice (a 85% decrease in the frequency of IFN-γ–producing cells) after CD8+ T-cell depletion (Fig. 2C), supporting that the vaccine-induced IFN-γ production is mediated mainly by CD8+ T cells.

The breadth of T-cell response was suggested to be important for antitumor effect. Accordingly, an additional ELISpot assay was conducted against 26 hTERT matrix peptide pools. There were nine matrix pools showing more than 50 spots, indicating that phTERT could elicit a broad range of T-cell immune responses (Supplementary Fig. S1A). There were eight epitope-comprising peptides in the region from amino acid 288 to 869 (Table 1). The C-terminus (amino acid 862-1158) had the most epitope-comprising peptides (8 peptides), which was consistent with the result in Fig. 2B. Individual peptides in pool 4 were used to confirm the matrix mapping result against the C-terminus of hTERT, and two immunodominant epitope-containing peptides (RKTVVNFPVEDEALG and KNPTFFLRVISDTAS) were identified (Supplementary Fig. S1B). As shown in Supplementary Fig. S1C, some of the identified peptides were conserved between mTERT and hTERT. All peptides listed in Table 1 were confirmed to contain one H2-Db–restricted epitope by using Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) analysis resource Consensus tool (http://tools.immuneepitope.org), suggesting effective processing of this antigen.

Table 1.

Identified epitope-comprising peptides in mice immunized with phTERT

Number of epitope-comprising peptidesSequence of epitope-comprising peptides
aa 1–296 (pool 1) None N/A 
aa 288–582 (pool 2) TGARRLVETIFLGSR 
  ETIFLGSRPWMPGTP 
  RPLFLELLGNHAQCP 
  LGNHAQCPYGVLLKT 
aa 575–869 (pool 3) DGLRPIVNMDYVVGA 
  NMDYVVGARTFRREK 
  SVLNYERARRPGLLG 
  ARRPGLLGASVLGLD 
  RKTVVNFPVEDEALG 
  PVEDEALGGTAFVQM 
  DTRTLEVQSDYSSYA 
aa 862–1158 (pool 4) QSDYSSYARTSIRAS 
  NSLQTVCTNIYKILL 
  TNIYKILLLQAYRFH 
  KNPTFFLRVISDTAS 
  RVISDTASLCYSILK 
Number of epitope-comprising peptidesSequence of epitope-comprising peptides
aa 1–296 (pool 1) None N/A 
aa 288–582 (pool 2) TGARRLVETIFLGSR 
  ETIFLGSRPWMPGTP 
  RPLFLELLGNHAQCP 
  LGNHAQCPYGVLLKT 
aa 575–869 (pool 3) DGLRPIVNMDYVVGA 
  NMDYVVGARTFRREK 
  SVLNYERARRPGLLG 
  ARRPGLLGASVLGLD 
  RKTVVNFPVEDEALG 
  PVEDEALGGTAFVQM 
  DTRTLEVQSDYSSYA 
aa 862–1158 (pool 4) QSDYSSYARTSIRAS 
  NSLQTVCTNIYKILL 
  TNIYKILLLQAYRFH 
  KNPTFFLRVISDTAS 
  RVISDTASLCYSILK 

NOTE: Two identified immuno-dominant epitope-comprising peptides are highlighted in bold.

Abbreviation: aa, amino acid.

Vaccination with phTERT in mice enhances magnitude of IFN-γ, CD107a, and TNF-α production in CD8 T cells

ICS assays were conducted to further characterize the responses induced by phTERT. The secretion of IFN-γ, CD107a, and TNF-α in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were determined (Fig. 2D). As shown in Fig. 2E, the average frequency of CD8+IFN-γ+ cells in immunized mice (0.8%) was significantly higher than that of the naïve group (0.1%; P < 0.05). The percentage of TNF-α–secreting cells from the total CD8+ T-cell population in phTERT-immunized mice was approximately 1.2% on average, whereas the naïve group produced only 0.1% (P < 0.05). After showing that antigen-specific CD8+ T cells had the ability to secrete IFN-γ and TNF-α, we investigated whether these CD8+ T cells exhibited a phenotype of putative CTLs. CD107a, a marker of cytolytic degranulation on lymphocytes, such as CD8+ T cells, was used to evaluate the CTL potential of vaccine-induced T cells. Following stimulation with hTERT peptides, the percentage of CD107a-positive CD8 cells was 1.8%, which was significantly higher than the percentage in the naïve group. There was a trend showing the increased production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and CD107a in CD4+ T cells in the immunized mice. However, the differences in average frequencies of CD4+IFN-γ+, CD4+ TNF-α+, and CD4+ CD107a+ cells were not statistically significant compared with what were observed in the naïve mice. The immune responses elicited by phTERT are heavily skewed toward driving CD8+ lymphocytes with the potential to lyse hTERT-expressing tumor cells.

Vaccination with phTERT is capable of breaking tolerance and generating robust hTERT-specific CTLs in rhesus macaques

The induction of T-cell immunity against the tumor antigen hTERT could be controlled by mechanisms of central and peripheral tolerance. Sequence homology analysis indicated that hTERT shares 64% identity with mouse TERT, and 96% identity with rhesus macaque TERT. Consequently, immune tolerance is expected to play a major role in testing the efficacy of an hTERT vaccine in NHPs. Furthermore, rhesus T-cell immunity is much closer to human T-cell immunity serving as a highly relevant model for immunotherapeutic vaccine development. Therefore, we moved forward to determine whether phTERT is able to break tolerance and induce cellular responses in rhesus macaques. The prebleed blood samples were studied to establish the background level of immune response of each individual animal in the study.

The results showed that the hTERT-immunized monkeys exhibited very low background level of immune response (5 SFU/106 PBMCs) with a dramatic increase in vaccine-induced responses following each immunization. The average number of IFN-γ–producing cells after the first, second, third, and fourth immunization was 11, 177, 834, and 1,834 SFU/106 PBMCs (Fig. 3A), respectively. These results showed that immunization with phTERT could elicit strong boostable hTERT-specific cellular responses. Epitope mapping was also conducted to investigate the diversity of the observed immune responses in rhesus macaques. Except for animal 5015 with only two matrix pools showing 50 or more SFU/106 PBMCs, the rest of immunized animals exhibited responses to 9 (M4628), 13 (M5012), and 10 (M5021) matrix pools with 50 or more spots out of 26 pools, suggesting that there were multiple dominant and subdominant epitopes in response to the vaccine (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Most identified epitope-comprising peptides are either 100% conserved between NHP and humans or exhibit only a single amino acid difference (Supplementary Fig. S2B and Table 2), supporting that this approach can break tolerance in relevant species to epitopes with importance to human immunotherapy.

Figure 3.

phTERT elicited robust CTLs in rhesus macaques. A, total IFN-γ responses induced by phTERT following each immunization. Four rhesus macaques were vaccinated with phTERT, four times intramuscularly followed by electroporation, 6 weeks apart, at 2 mg DNA/each immunization. PBMCs were isolated and stimulated with hTERT peptides for 24 hours. Frequencies of hTERT-specific IFN-γ–secreting cells/106 PBMCs were determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay. B, enhanced perforin release in immunized monkeys. Prebleed and PBMCs after last immunization were stimulated with hTERT peptides for 24 hours. Frequencies of hTERT-specific perforin-secreting cells/106 PBMCs were determined by perforin ELISpot assay. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.

Figure 3.

phTERT elicited robust CTLs in rhesus macaques. A, total IFN-γ responses induced by phTERT following each immunization. Four rhesus macaques were vaccinated with phTERT, four times intramuscularly followed by electroporation, 6 weeks apart, at 2 mg DNA/each immunization. PBMCs were isolated and stimulated with hTERT peptides for 24 hours. Frequencies of hTERT-specific IFN-γ–secreting cells/106 PBMCs were determined by IFN-γ ELISpot assay. B, enhanced perforin release in immunized monkeys. Prebleed and PBMCs after last immunization were stimulated with hTERT peptides for 24 hours. Frequencies of hTERT-specific perforin-secreting cells/106 PBMCs were determined by perforin ELISpot assay. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.

Close modal
Table 2.

Summary of epitope mapping results in rhesus macaques immunized with phTERT

Monkey IDNo. of epitope-comprising peptidesNo. of epitope-comprising peptides with 100% identity between hTERT and RhTERTNo. of epitope-comprising peptides with single aa difference between hTERT and RhTERT
M4628 17 
M5012 41 19 14 
M5015 
M5021 24 12 
Monkey IDNo. of epitope-comprising peptidesNo. of epitope-comprising peptides with 100% identity between hTERT and RhTERTNo. of epitope-comprising peptides with single aa difference between hTERT and RhTERT
M4628 17 
M5012 41 19 14 
M5015 
M5021 24 12 

Abbreviations: aa, amino acid; RhTERT, rhesus macaque TERT.

As perforin is known to be a major cytolytic protein and key effector molecule for T cell–mediated cytolysis, perforin ELISpot was used to determine whether hTERT-specific T cells were capable of releasing perforin from cytotoxic granules. Results showed that the average numbers of perforin-producing cells were 332 SFU/106 PBMCs (Fig. 3B), indicating that vaccination elicited CTLs that could destroy hTERT-expressing target cells.

Assessment of physiologic parameters in NHP

To examine whether there is any CTL-mediated host toxicity, we assessed a number of physiologic parameters in NHP (Supplementary Table S1). No significant weight loss was observed and white blood cell (WBC) counts remained within normal range. No elevation of alkaline phosphatase (ALK P), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TBIL) indicated that induction of hTERT-specific immune responses did not cause significant damage to the liver. No evidence of impaired kidney function was seen, as creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) remained within normal limits. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) was evaluated to determine whether electroporation or induction of immune responses negatively influenced skeletal or cardiac muscle. Elevation of CPK was not detected. Overall, we did not observe any vaccine-induced adverse effects in NHP despite evidence of strong hTERT-specific CTLs in vivo.

Vaccination with phTERT elicits antitumor immunity and delays the E6/E7–expressing tumor growth

It is important to determine whether the robust phTERT-induced T cells could actually exhibit antitumor immunity in an in vivo challenge model. As hTERT may have value as a broad immunogen to prevent tumor recurrence posttreatment or in identified high-risk individuals, we first studied immunization of mice followed by tumor challenge. High level of mTERT expression is detected in TC-1 tumor cells (41), therefore, an in vivo TC-1 tumor challenge study was conducted to assess whether vaccination with phTERT could mediate antitumor immunity (Fig. 4A). The data showed that immunized mice exhibited significantly smaller tumors compared with those in the naïve group (Fig. 4B and D) at all days postchallenge till day 35 (P < 0.05). Thirty-seven days posttumor challenge, the mice in naïve group either died or were euthanized because the diameters of tumors reached 20 mm. In contrast, about 70% of phTERT-immunized mice still survived 37 days posttumor implantation (Fig. 4C). These data indicated that phTERT induced potent antitumor immunity, and immunized animals exhibited delayed tumor growth and improved survival.

Figure 4.

Preventive antitumor immunity induced by phTERT. A, experimental design. Ten mice were immunized with 50 μg of phTERT four times biweekly. Each mouse was challenged with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells injected subcutaneously including 10 naïve mice, which served as a control. Tumors were measured twice weekly. B, delayed tumor growth in immunized mice. Tumor measurements for each time point are shown only for surviving mice. C, vaccination with phTERT extended survival. D, representative image of tumor size in naïve or phTERT-vaccinated group at day 34 after TC-1 implantation. E, percentage killing of a representative phTERT-immunized mouse. CFSE-labeled splenocytes were pulsed with either hTERT or HPV6 E6/E7 peptides and adoptively transferred into naïve or phTERT immunized mice through the tail vein. Forty-eight hours later, CFSE-labeled cells were recovered and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to quantify percentage killing. F, average percentage killing of 5 phTERT-immunized mice. Results were presented as mean ± SEM. The experiment shown is representative of two repeated experiments.

Figure 4.

Preventive antitumor immunity induced by phTERT. A, experimental design. Ten mice were immunized with 50 μg of phTERT four times biweekly. Each mouse was challenged with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells injected subcutaneously including 10 naïve mice, which served as a control. Tumors were measured twice weekly. B, delayed tumor growth in immunized mice. Tumor measurements for each time point are shown only for surviving mice. C, vaccination with phTERT extended survival. D, representative image of tumor size in naïve or phTERT-vaccinated group at day 34 after TC-1 implantation. E, percentage killing of a representative phTERT-immunized mouse. CFSE-labeled splenocytes were pulsed with either hTERT or HPV6 E6/E7 peptides and adoptively transferred into naïve or phTERT immunized mice through the tail vein. Forty-eight hours later, CFSE-labeled cells were recovered and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to quantify percentage killing. F, average percentage killing of 5 phTERT-immunized mice. Results were presented as mean ± SEM. The experiment shown is representative of two repeated experiments.

Close modal

hTERT-specific CD8 T cells induced by vaccination eliminated target cells in vivo

Although we showed the upregulation of CD107a and increased release of perforin in hTERT-specific CD8 T cells, we thought it would be important to confirm CTL activities in vivo. Therefore, an in vivo cytotoxicity assay was conducted to evaluate the ability of vaccine-induced CD8 T cells to eliminate target cells. CFSE-labeled splenocytes were pulsed with either hTERT or HPV6 E6/E7 peptides and adoptively transferred into either naïve or phTERT-immunized mice. The killing activity was evaluated by gating on CFSE-labeled splenocytes (Fig. 4E). As shown in Fig. 4F, the average percentage killing observed in 5 immunized mice was about 73%, indicating a strong antigen-specific killing of target cells. No killing of irrelevant T cells was observed. The result confirmed that the vaccine-induced CD8 T cells had killing capacity to initiate target cell death in vivo.

Vaccination with phTERT slows the tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice

Given the results obtained from the prophylactic tumor study, an in vivo tumor therapy study was conducted to analyze in an initial fashion the therapeutic effect of vaccination with phTERT. We initiated the study by challenging mice with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells on day 0. Three days after TC-1 cells implantation, 10 mice in the hTERT group were immunized with phTERT and boosted on day 10, 17, and 24 (Fig. 5A). All mice exhibited tumor growth, however, the tumors in phTERT-immunized mice were significantly smaller than those in the naïve group at day 39 (P < 0.05; Fig. 5B). Six of 10 phTERT-immunized mice still survived 39 days posttumor implantation, whereas all mice in naïve group were either dead or euthanized (Fig. 5C). Therefore, vaccination with phTERT slows tumor growth and improve survival rate of tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice.

Figure 5.

Therapeutic effect induced by phTERT in tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. A, experimental design. Mice were separated into two groups of 10 mice, naïve and hTERT group. On day 0, all mice were injected subcutaneously with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells. Starting on day 3, all mice in the hTERT group were immunized with 50 μg of phTERT at weekly intervals four times. B, vaccination with phTERT delayed tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice. Tumor measurements for each time point are shown only for surviving mice. C, vaccination with phTERT extended survival in tumor-bearing mice. The experiment shown is representative of two repeated experiments.

Figure 5.

Therapeutic effect induced by phTERT in tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. A, experimental design. Mice were separated into two groups of 10 mice, naïve and hTERT group. On day 0, all mice were injected subcutaneously with 5 × 104 TC-1 cells. Starting on day 3, all mice in the hTERT group were immunized with 50 μg of phTERT at weekly intervals four times. B, vaccination with phTERT delayed tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice. Tumor measurements for each time point are shown only for surviving mice. C, vaccination with phTERT extended survival in tumor-bearing mice. The experiment shown is representative of two repeated experiments.

Close modal

Overexpression of hTERT has been linked to development and progression of more than 85% of cancer types in a variety of species. Peptides derived from hTERT can be processed by tumors and presented in the context of MHC class I molecules, thus triggering hTERT-specific T cells (42–44). Although there has been a great deal of important activity, there remains a need for improved hTERT immunogens.

DNA vaccines have emerged as an attractive approach for antigen-specific immunotherapy. This technology has significant potential, compared with traditional protein and peptide vaccines, in terms of generating CTL responses (45). However, few studies have been conducted to develop hTERT DNA vaccines. Previously, the DNA platform was studied in prime-boost strategies due to the low immunogenicity of hTERT DNA vaccines (46–48). Here, we developed a novel hTERT DNA vaccine using gene optimization strategies and showed that the vaccine delivered by electroporation induced strong cellular immune responses in both mice and NHP. The immune responses observed in monkeys were much higher than what has been previously described for other hTERT DNA vaccines. The T-cell immune responses after just three immunizations with 2 mg of phTERT by electroporation in monkeys (834 SFU/106 PBMCs) were already comparable to these induced by a DNA/electroporation prime Ad6 boost strategy (which included 5 mg dose DNA delivered with electroporation five times followed by 1011 VP of Ad6 boost two times; ref. 48). It is likely that the combination of better construct optimization strategies and a more potent CELLECTRA electroporation delivery system accounts for the increased vaccine-induced responses. Recently, by using a similar combination of the approaches in gene optimization and gene delivery, we have successfully shown that a novel human papillomavirus (HPV) therapeutic DNA vaccine could induce robust cellular immune responses to E6/E7 of HPV16 and 18 with cytolytic functionality in women previously treated for high-grade cervical dysplasia (30). The immune responses boosted significantly further when the fourth immunization of phTERT was conducted (1,834 SFU/106 PBMCs), suggesting enhanced antigen-specific immune responses may be obtained by multiple vaccinations. This ability to boost T-cell responses without antivector responses or other limitations could be an important advantage in clinical studies.

Cytotoxic CD8 T cells are considered crucial components of antitumor immunity that attack tumor cells presenting TAA peptide with MHC class I on their surface (49, 50). As a result, one major focus in the field of cancer immunotherapy has been on the stimulation of antigen-specific CD8+ CTL responses. Research has indicated that patients with breast cancer who mounted an hTERT-specific CTL exhibit significantly longer median overall survival (51). Here, we first showed vaccination of mice with the hTERT DNA vaccine significantly enhanced the numbers of CD107a-, IFN-γ-, and TNF-α–producing cells, indicating the generation of putative antigen-specific CTLs. Second, the vaccine-induced T cells exhibited ability to release perforin in the monkeys immunized with phTERT. Moreover, instead of conducting the 51Cr-release assay, we applied an in vivo cytoxicity assay to confirm the CTL function in vivo by flow cytometry. This assay allowed us to measure cytotoxicity quantitatively by counting the loss of antigen-specific target cells. Our data showed vaccination-elicited CTL that could destroy target cells (the average percentage killing observed in the immunized mice was about 73%). The clinical benefit of the vaccine-induced CTL responses needs to be further investigated.

Effective cancer therapeutic vaccines that medicate clinical responses in patients with cancer may require generation of broadly targeting CTLs against multiple epitopes to limit tumor immune escape. Recently, a therapeutic vaccine for renal cell cancer consisting of multiple tumor-associated peptides was able to induce T cells associated with longer patient survival (52). Expanded diversity of the T-cell responses in these trials was associated with clinical benefit, indicating that targeting multiple epitopes in immunotherapy improved clinical efficacy. Liao and colleagues showed that a peptide vaccine including four hTERT HLA-A0201–restricted CTL epitopes could elicit stronger antitumor immunity than their corresponding linear peptides (16). Therefore, multiepitope-containing DNA vaccines may represent promising tools for inducing antitumor responses in patients with cancer. By delivering large numbers of CTL epitopes, DNA vaccines may avoid T-cell epitope restriction to a particular MHC haplotype and possible immunoselection of epitope loss variants (53). Here, we confirmed that vaccination with phTERT could not only induce multiple H2-Db–restricted epitopes in mice, but also could elicit multiple dominant and subdominant epitopes in monkeys. A broad spectrum of T-cell responses was induced by vaccination, implying a possible clinical benefit and suggesting potential improved performance in the clinic.

It has been reported that hTERT antigen-specific CTLs are effective in targeting human cancers in vivo (8, 22). As hTERT T cells could be considered effective immune surveillance to prevent recurrence posttreatment or to limit tumor development in identified high-risk individuals, we studied immunization of mice followed by tumor challenge for their ability against tumor challenge. Previous studies have shown that xenogeneic melanoma-associated DNA vaccines can elicit effective antitumor immunity against murine melanoma (54, 55). Yamano and colleagues found that a human C-terminal TERT DNA vaccine induced effective antitumor immunity against TS/A murine breast cancer (46). Because the amino acid homology of NTE, RT, and CTE regions between hTERT and murine TERT are 61.8%, 65.5%, and 69.9%, respectively, the hTERT has regions of homology, which may induce testable antitumor immunity against murine TERT-expressing tumor cells. Hence, we used a TC-1 tumor challenge model to evaluate the antitumor effect of hTERT-specific CTL. The results show that vaccination with phTERT conferred delayed tumor growth and longer overall survival. As this antitumor effect was potentially associated with T-cell tumor infiltration, it will be interesting to conduct more studies to investigate the phenotype of these tumor-infiltrating CD8 CTLs. On the basis of the data we observed in the NHP study, we would expect that closer matching of a mouse TERT vaccine to the native mouse sequence would further improve the effectiveness.

A major challenge with regard to hTERT and other TAA immunotherapy vaccines is to develop therapies capable of generating a robust CTL against this self-antigen in a safe manner. Although hTERT is overexpressed in most tumor cells, its expression can also be detected in rare normal cells such as hematopoietic progenitor cells, spermatogonia in the testis, activated lymphocytes, and certain epithelial cells (56). Consequently, the question of whether vaccine-induced hTERT-specific CTLs carries the risk of inducing autoimmune responses with pathologic consequence was raised. Many studies have shown the hTERT-specific CTLs have no detectable effect on hTERT-positive CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells or activated T cells (43, 44) and do not result in autoimmune responses that target normal hTERT-expressing cells (22, 57). In addition, clinical studies in patients with cancer using hTERT-based vaccines have not shown toxicity (8, 19, 58). These findings may reflect relatively low levels of hTERT expression or ineffective processing of hTERT peptides in normal cells. In the present study, several important physiologic parameters were evaluated and no vaccine-induced adverse effects were detected in phTERT-immunized monkeys despite evidence of strong hTERT-specific CTLs.

Taken together, we report that administration of a synthetic highly optimized hTERT DNA vaccine in combination with adaptive constant current electroporation delivery platform was capable of breaking immune tolerance and eliciting robust and diverse CTLs in mouse and NHP models. These vaccine-induced CTLs seemed not to be associated with any major toxicities or organ damage, and were effective in mounting a potent antitumor response. These data support further study of phTERT in the setting of cancer immunotherapy, to improve tumor immune surveillance in high-risk individuals, and prevention of disease recurrence.

N.Y. Sardesai has ownership interest (including patents) in Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D.B. Weiner has commercial research grant from Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MVI, ownership interest (including patents) in Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and is a consultant/advisory board member of Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis, VGXi, Pfizer, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design: J. Yan, M.P. Morrow, N.Y. Sardesai, D.B. Weiner

Development of methodology: J. Yan, N. Obeng-Adjei, N.Y. Sardesai, D.B. Weiner

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): J. Yan, T.H. Shin, M.P. Morrow, J.N. Walters

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): J. Yan, P. Pankhong

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: J. Yan, P. Pankhong, N. Obeng-Adjei, M.P. Morrow, A.S. Khan, N.Y. Sardesai, D.B. Weiner

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): J. Yan, N.Y. Sardesai

Study supervision: J. Yan, A.S. Khan, N.Y. Sardesai

This work was supported in part by NIH grants and a grant from the Basser Research Center for BRCA in the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania awarded to D.B. Weiner. J.N. Walters notes funding from Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (5T32CA115299-07).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Chiang
CL
,
Benencia
F
,
Coukos
G
. 
Whole tumor antigen vaccines
.
Semin Immunol
2010
;
22
:
132
43
.
2.
Kim
NW
,
Piatyszek
MA
,
Prowse
KR
,
Harley
CB
,
West
MD
,
Ho
PL
, et al
Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer
.
Science
1994
;
266
:
2011
5
.
3.
Shay
JW
,
Bacchetti
S
. 
A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer
.
Eur J Cancer
1997
;
33
:
787
91
.
4.
Hiyama
E
,
Hiyama
K
. 
Telomerase as tumor marker
.
Cancer Lett
2003
;
194
:
221
33
.
5.
Greider
CW
,
Blackburn
EH
. 
The telomere terminal transferase of Tetrahymena is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme with two kinds of primer specificity
.
Cell
1987
;
51
:
887
98
.
6.
Hastie
ND
,
Dempster
M
,
Dunlop
MG
,
Thompson
AM
,
Green
DK
,
Allshire
RC
. 
Telomere reduction in human colorectal carcinoma and with ageing
.
Nature
1990
;
346
:
866
8
.
7.
Harrington
L
,
Zhou
W
,
McPhail
T
,
Oulton
R
,
Yeung
DS
,
Mar
V
, et al
Human telomerase contains evolutionarily conserved catalytic and structural subunits
.
Genes Dev
1997
;
11
:
3109
15
.
8.
Vonderheide
RH
,
Domchek
SM
,
Schultze
JL
,
George
DJ
,
Hoar
KM
,
Chen
DY
, et al
Vaccination of cancer patients against telomerase induces functional antitumor CD8+ T lymphocytes
.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
828
39
.
9.
Ho
MM
,
Ng
AV
,
Lam
S
,
Hung
JY
. 
Side population in human lung cancer cell lines and tumors is enriched with stem-like cancer cells
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
4827
33
.
10.
Marian
CO
,
Cho
SK
,
McEllin
BM
,
Maher
EA
,
Hatanpaa
KJ
,
Madden
CJ
, et al
The telomerase antagonist, imetelstat, efficiently targets glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells leading to decreased proliferation and tumor growth
.
Clin Cancer Res
2010
;
16
:
154
63
.
11.
Marian
CO
,
Wright
WE
,
Shay
JW
. 
The effects of telomerase inhibition on prostate tumor-initiating cells
.
Int J Cancer
2010
;
127
:
321
31
.
12.
Harley
CB
. 
Telomerase and cancer therapeutics
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2008
;
8
:
167
79
.
13.
Beatty
GL
,
Vonderheide
RH
. 
Telomerase as a universal tumor antigen for cancer vaccines
.
Expert Rev Vaccines
2008
;
7
:
881
7
.
14.
Shaw
VE
,
Naisbitt
DJ
,
Costello
E
,
Greenhalf
W
,
Park
BK
,
Neoptolemos
JP
, et al
Current status of GV1001 and other telomerase vaccination strategies in the treatment of cancer
.
Expert Rev Vaccines
2010
;
9
:
1007
16
.
15.
Wenandy
L
,
Sorensen
RB
,
Sengelov
L
,
Svane
IM
,
thor Straten
P
,
Andersen
MH
. 
The immunogenicity of the hTERT540-548 peptide in cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2008
;
14
:
4
7
.
16.
Liao
ZL
,
Tang
XD
,
Lu
MH
,
Wu
YY
,
Cao
YL
,
Fang
DC
, et al
Antitumor effect of new multiple antigen peptide based on HLA-A0201–restricted CTL epitopes of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)
.
Cancer Sci
2012
;
103
:
1920
8
.
17.
Kokhaei
P
,
Palma
M
,
Hansson
L
,
Osterborg
A
,
Mellstedt
H
,
Choudhury
A
. 
Telomerase (hTERT 611-626) serves as a tumor antigen in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and generates spontaneously antileukemic, cytotoxic T cells
.
Exp Hematol
2007
;
35
:
297
304
.
18.
Inderberg-Suso
EM
,
Trachsel
S
,
Lislerud
K
,
Rasmussen
AM
,
Gaudernack
G
. 
Widespread CD4+ T-cell reactivity to novel hTERT epitopes following vaccination of cancer patients with a single hTERT peptide GV1001
.
Oncoimmunology
2012
;
1
:
670
86
.
19.
Su
Z
,
Dannull
J
,
Yang
BK
,
Dahm
P
,
Coleman
D
,
Yancey
D
, et al
Telomerase mRNA-transfected dendritic cells stimulate antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses in patients with metastatic prostate cancer
.
J Immunol
2005
;
174
:
3798
807
.
20.
Suso
EM
,
Dueland
S
,
Rasmussen
AM
,
Vetrhus
T
,
Aamdal
S
,
Kvalheim
G
, et al
hTERT mRNA dendritic cell vaccination: complete response in a pancreatic cancer patient associated with response against several hTERT epitopes
.
Cancer Immunol Immunother
2011
;
60
:
809
18
.
21.
Rusakiewicz
S
,
Dosset
M
,
Mollier
K
,
Souque
P
,
Charneau
P
,
Wain-Hobson
S
, et al
Immunogenicity of a recombinant lentiviral vector carrying human telomerase tumor antigen in HLA-B*0702 transgenic mice
.
Vaccine
2010
;
28
:
6374
81
.
22.
Adotevi
O
,
Mollier
K
,
Neuveut
C
,
Dosset
M
,
Ravel
P
,
Fridman
WH
, et al
Targeting human telomerase reverse transcriptase with recombinant lentivector is highly effective to stimulate antitumor CD8 T-cell immunity in vivo
.
Blood
2010
;
115
:
3025
32
.
23.
Rice
J
,
Ottensmeier
CH
,
Stevenson
FK
. 
DNA vaccines: precision tools for activating effective immunity against cancer
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2008
;
8
:
108
20
.
24.
Tagawa
ST
,
Lee
P
,
Snively
J
,
Boswell
W
,
Ounpraseuth
S
,
Lee
S
, et al
Phase I study of intranodal delivery of a plasmid DNA vaccine for patients with stage IV melanoma
.
Cancer
2003
;
98
:
144
54
.
25.
Todorova
K
,
Ignatova
I
,
Tchakarov
S
,
Altankova
I
,
Zoubak
S
,
Kyurkchiev
S
, et al
Humoral immune response in prostate cancer patients after immunization with gene-based vaccines that encode for a protein that is proteasomally degraded
.
Cancer Immun
2005
;
5
:
1
.
26.
Deml
L
,
Bojak
A
,
Steck
S
,
Graf
M
,
Wild
J
,
Schirmbeck
R
, et al
Multiple effects of codon usage optimization on expression and immunogenicity of DNA candidate vaccines encoding the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein
.
J Virol
2001
;
75
:
10991
1001
.
27.
Muthumani
K
,
Zhang
D
,
Dayes
NS
,
Hwang
DS
,
Calarota
SA
,
Choo
AY
, et al
Novel engineered HIV-1 East African Clade-A gp160 plasmid construct induces strong humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in vivo
.
Virology
2003
;
314
:
134
46
.
28.
Schneider
R
,
Campbell
M
,
Nasioulas
G
,
Felber
BK
,
Pavlakis
GN
. 
Inactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibitory elements allows Rev-independent expression of Gag and Gag/protease and particle formation
.
J Virol
1997
;
71
:
4892
903
.
29.
Sardesai
NY
,
Weiner
DB
. 
Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success
.
Curr Opin Immunol
2011
;
23
:
421
9
.
30.
Bagarazzi
ML
,
Yan
J
,
Morrow
MP
,
Shen
X
,
Parker
RL
,
Lee
JC
, et al
Immunotherapy against HPV16/18 generates potent TH1 and cytotoxic cellular immune responses
.
Sci Transl Med
2012
;
4
:
155ra38
.
31.
Yan
J
,
Yoon
H
,
Kumar
K
,
Ramanathan
MP
,
Corbitt
N
,
Kutzler
M
, et al
Enhanced diversity and magnitude of cellular immune responses elicited by a novel engineered HIV-1 subtype B consensus-based envelope DNA vaccine
.
Mol Ther
2007
;
15
:
411
21
.
32.
Shin
TH
,
Pankhong
P
,
Yan
J
,
Khan
AS
,
Sardesai
NY
,
Weiner
DB
. 
Induction of robust cellular immunity against HPV6 and HPV11 in mice by DNA vaccine encoding for E6/E7 antigen
.
Hum Vaccin Immunother
2012
;
8
:
470
8
.
33.
Lin
KY
,
Guarnieri
FG
,
Staveley-O'Carroll
KF
,
Levitsky
H
,
August
T
,
Pardoll
D
, et al
Treatment of established tumors with a novel vaccine that enhances major histocompatibility class II presentation of tumor antigen
.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
21
16
.
34.
Yan
J
,
Reichenbach
DK
,
Corbitt
N
,
Hokey
DA
,
Ramanathan
MP
,
McKinney
KA
, et al
Induction of antitumor immunity in vivo following delivery of a novel HPV-16 DNA vaccine encoding an E6/E7 fusion antigen
.
Vaccine
2009
;
27
:
431
40
.
35.
Menon
C
,
Polin
GM
,
Prabakaran
I
,
Hsi
A
,
Cheung
C
,
Culver
JP
, et al
An integrated approach to measuring tumor oxygen status using human melanoma xenografts as a model
.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
7232
40
.
36.
Durward
MA
,
Harms
J
,
Magnani
DM
,
Eskra
L
,
Splitter
GA
. 
Discordant Brucella melitensis antigens yield cognate CD8+ T cells in vivo
.
Infect Immun
2010
;
78
:
168
76
.
37.
Barber
DL
,
Wherry
EJ
,
Ahmed
R
. 
Cutting edge: rapid in vivo killing by memory CD8 T cells
.
J Immunol
2003
;
171
:
27
31
.
38.
Boyer
J
,
Robinson
T
,
Kutzler
M
,
Parkinson
R
,
Calarota
SA
,
Sidhu
M
, et al
SIV DNA vaccine co-administered with IL-12 expression plasmid enhances CD8 SIV cellular immune responses in cynomolgus macaques
.
J Med Pramatol
2005
;
34
:
262
70
.
39.
Calarota
SA
,
Hokey
DA
,
Dai
A
,
Jure-Kunkel
MN
,
Balimane
P
,
Weiner
DB
. 
Augmentation of SIV DNA vaccine-induced cellular immunity by targeting the 4-1BB costimulatory molecule
.
Vaccine
2008
;
26
:
3121
34
.
40.
Gross
DA
,
Graff-Dubois
S
,
Opolon
P
,
Cornet
S
,
Alves
P
,
Bennaceur-Griscelli
A
, et al
High vaccination efficiency of low-affinity epitopes in antitumor immunotherapy
.
J Clin Invest
2004
;
113
:
425
33
.
41.
Zhang
Z
,
Yang
X
,
Zhang
Y
,
Zeng
B
,
Wang
S
,
Zhu
T
, et al
Delivery of telomerase reverse transcriptase small interfering RNA in complex with positively charged single-walled carbon nanotubes suppresses tumor growth
.
Clin Cancer Res
2006
;
12
:
4933
9
.
42.
Lev
A
,
Denkberg
G
,
Cohen
CJ
,
Tzukerman
M
,
Skorecki
KL
,
Chames
P
, et al
Isolation and characterization of human recombinant antibodies endowed with the antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted specificity of T cells directed toward the widely expressed tumor T-cell epitopes of the telomerase catalytic subunit
.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
3184
94
.
43.
Minev
B
,
Hipp
J
,
Firat
H
,
Schmidt
JD
,
Langlade-Demoyen
P
,
Zanetti
M
. 
Cytotoxic T cell immunity against telomerase reverse transcriptase in humans
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000
;
97
:
4796
801
.
44.
Vonderheide
RH
,
Hahn
WC
,
Schultze
JL
,
Nadler
LM
. 
The telomerase catalytic subunit is a widely expressed tumor-associated antigen recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes
.
Immunity
1999
;
10
:
673
9
.
45.
Gurunathan
S
,
Klinman
DM
,
Seder
RA
. 
DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization*
.
Annu Rev Immunol
2000
;
18
:
927
74
.
46.
Yamano
T
,
Kaneda
Y
,
Hiramatsu
SH
,
Huang
S
,
Tran
AN
,
Giuliano
AE
, et al
Immunity against breast cancer by TERT DNA vaccine primed with chemokine CCL21
.
Cancer Gene Ther
2007
;
14
:
451
9
.
47.
Conforti
A
,
Cipriani
B
,
Peruzzi
D
,
Dharmapuri
S
,
Kandimalla
ER
,
Agrawal
S
, et al
A TLR9 agonist enhances therapeutic effects of telomerase genetic vaccine
.
Vaccine
2010
;
28
:
3522
30
.
48.
Dharmapuri
S
,
Peruzzi
D
,
Mennuni
C
,
Calvaruso
F
,
Giampaoli
S
,
Barbato
G
, et al
Coadministration of telomerase genetic vaccine and a novel TLR9 agonist in nonhuman primates
.
Mol Ther
2009
;
17
:
1804
13
.
49.
Yu
P
,
Lee
Y
,
Liu
W
,
Chin
RK
,
Wang
J
,
Wang
Y
, et al
Priming of naive T cells inside tumors leads to eradication of established tumors
.
Nat Immunol
2004
;
5
:
141
9
.
50.
Ochsenbein
AF
,
Sierro
S
,
Odermatt
B
,
Pericin
M
,
Karrer
U
,
Hermans
J
, et al
Roles of tumour localization, second signals and cross priming in cytotoxic T-cell induction
.
Nature
2001
;
411
:
1058
64
.
51.
Domchek
SM
,
Recio
A
,
Mick
R
,
Clark
CE
,
Carpenter
EL
,
Fox
KR
, et al
Telomerase-specific T-cell immunity in breast cancer: effect of vaccination on tumor immunosurveillance
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
10546
55
.
52.
Walter
S
,
Weinschenk
T
,
Stenzl
A
,
Zdrojowy
R
,
Pluzanska
A
,
Szczylik
C
, et al
Multipeptide immune response to cancer vaccine IMA901 after single-dose cyclophosphamide associates with longer patient survival
.
Nat Med
2012
;
18
:
1254
61
.
53.
Bei
R
,
Scardino
A
. 
TAA polyepitope DNA-based vaccines: a potential tool for cancer therapy
.
J Biomed Biotechnol
2010
;
2010
:
102758
.
54.
Tanaka
M
,
Kaneda
Y
,
Fujii
S
,
Yamano
T
,
Hashimoto
K
,
Huang
SK
, et al
Induction of a systemic immune response by a polyvalent melanoma-associated antigen DNA vaccine for prevention and treatment of malignant melanoma
.
Mol Ther
2002
;
5
:
291
9
.
55.
Yamano
T
,
Kaneda
Y
,
Huang
S
,
Hiramatsu
SH
,
Hoon
DS
. 
Enhancement of immunity by a DNA melanoma vaccine against TRP2 with CCL21 as an adjuvant
.
Mol Ther
2006
;
13
:
194
202
.
56.
Kolquist
KA
,
Ellisen
LW
,
Counter
CM
,
Meyerson
M
,
Tan
LK
,
Weinberg
RA
, et al
Expression of TERT in early premalignant lesions and a subset of cells in normal tissues
.
Nat Genet
1998
;
19
:
182
6
.
57.
Mennuni
C
,
Ugel
S
,
Mori
F
,
Cipriani
B
,
Iezzi
M
,
Pannellini
T
, et al
Preventive vaccination with telomerase controls tumor growth in genetically engineered and carcinogen-induced mouse models of cancer
.
Cancer Res
2008
;
68
:
9865
74
.
58.
Parkhurst
MR
,
Riley
JP
,
Igarashi
T
,
Li
Y
,
Robbins
PF
,
Rosenberg
SA
. 
Immunization of patients with the hTERT:540-548 peptide induces peptide-reactive T lymphocytes that do not recognize tumors endogenously expressing telomerase
.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
4688
98
.