The innate immune system has evolved in multicellular organisms to detect and respond to situations that compromise tissue homeostasis. It comprises a set of tissue-resident and circulating leukocytes primarily designed to sense pathogens and tissue damage through hardwired receptors and eliminate noxious sources by mediating inflammatory processes. While indispensable to immunity, the inflammatory mediators produced in situ by activated innate cells during injury or infection are also associated with increased cancer risk and tumorigenesis. Here, we outline basic principles of innate immune cell functions in inflammation and discuss how these functions converge upon cancer development. Cancer Immunol Res; 1(2); 77–84. ©2013 AACR.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

The members of the planning committee have no real or apparent conflict of interest to disclose.

Upon completion of this activity, the participant should understand the functions of the innate immune system, the basic principles of inflammation as host defense against perturbed tissue homeostasis, and how persistent inflammasome signaling may promote tumorigenesis.

In the context of defense against infectious pathogens, innate immunity entails preexisting defense mechanisms that have specialized to specifically recognize microbes and eliminate infection (1). Innate immunity is coordinated by epithelial barriers that block entry of microbes, protective plasma proteins, and tissue-resident or circulating leukocytes that are mostly phagocytic macrophages and neutrophils, dendritic cells (DC), natural killer (NK) cells, and innate lymphoid cells (ILC). The main purpose of the innate immune system is to mediate inflammation, the process in which blood cells and plasma components are delivered to sites of perturbed tissue homeostasis, as in the case of infection or injury (2, 3). Inflammation is triggered mainly by the recognition of microbes or other “danger” signals by receptors expressed by innate immune cells (4, 5). During the onset of an acute inflammatory response, tissue-resident macrophages, DCs, and mast cells produce a variety of chemotactic molecules, cytokines, and inflammatory mediators that recruit neutrophils and monocytes to the affected tissue. Through the release of antimicrobial substances, extensive phagocytosis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and possibly activation of adaptive immune responses, innate immune cells act to eliminate the noxious source and regain tissue homeostasis.

The first wave of blood cell production in mammals occurs in extraembryonic yolk sac blood islands from where primitive hematopoietic and endothelial progenitors emerge (6). Definitive hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) originate subsequently in the midgestation embryo from hemogenic endothelium cells in the aortic-gonad mesonephros region (7). Following extramedullary hematopoiesis in the fetal liver, HSCs home to the bone marrow where their self-renewal and multilineage hematopoietic differentiation are supported throughout adulthood. The development of immune cells follows a hierarchy of differentiation of common lineage-committed progenitor cells in the bone marrow (8). In contrast with adaptive immune cells, innate immune cells are mostly postmitotic and need to be replenished from the pool of bone marrow stem and progenitor cells (9). Increases in peripheral demand for innate immune effector cells are therefore controlled mostly at the level of proliferation of the hematopoietic stem and progeny cells and mobilization via the blood stream to the affected sites. Nevertheless, in situ expansion of resident innate immune cells may be fundamental in certain inflammatory processes (10). Furthermore, mature innate immune cells show remarkable plasticity towards diverse cellular functions and fates in response to environmental signals (11). While this is an important attribute in the regulation of immune response to infection or injury, it may also be instrumental in the process of tumorigenesis, as discussed below.

Cells of the innate immune system

Macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils.

Macrophages are tissue-resident phagocytes initially described as end products of circulating monocytes that originate in the bone marrow. Along with this classical scheme of the mononuclear phagocytic system, it is also becoming apparent that the adult tissue macrophage population consists of distinct and diverse cell types with different developmental origins (12–14). Macrophages constitute 10% to 15% of most tissues and are required for homeostatic clearance of apoptotic cells, control of epithelial cell turnover, and assisting the adaptation of tissues to stress conditions (2, 15). The ability to phagocytose microorganisms and cell debris is shared by neutrophils, which are polymorphonuclear granulocytes that produce highly potent, albeit less specific and potentially cytotoxic, antimicrobial substances and abundant inflammatory mediators (16, 17). Neutrophils are short-lived leukocytes generated in great number in the bone marrow during steady state; they circulate in the blood stream for no more than a few hours and they are tightly regulated in tissues to avoid collateral damage. It is the interactive combined functions of these cells that allow not only for direct killing of pathogens, but also for the regulation and resolution of the inflammatory process (18).

The inflammatory response to infection follows 4 general consecutive phases: pathogen recognition, recruitment of immune cells to the site of infection, pathogen elimination, and resolution of inflammation (1). This sequence of events is initiated by resident macrophages or DCs as they sense pathogens or tissue damage (Fig. 1). In addition, a subset of “resident” (or nonclassical) monocytes has been shown to mediate early immune responses; they patrol the luminal endothelial surface in healthy tissues and can rapidly invade damaged or infected sites, where they differentiate into macrophages (19). Damage- or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (DAMP/PAMP) released by necrotic cell death are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRR) expressed by innate immune cells, leading to their activation and secretion of proinflammatory mediators (see below). The initial role of innate immune cell activation is to condition the vasculature of affected tissues for leukocyte infiltration, a process mediated by factors that induce vasodilation (histamine, prostaglandins, nitric oxide) and vascular permeability (histamine, leukotrienes), and the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules on endothelial cells [TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1; ref. 20]. The sensing of tissue damage signals such as reactive oxygen species or necrosis-associated proteins and other DAMPs induces the production of neutrophil-attracting chemokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) by activated macrophages and monocytes that act mainly through the neutrophil chemokine receptor CXCR2 (18). Activated neutrophils extravasating across postcapillary venules and entering the interstitial space, release secretory vesicles containing proteins (e.g., azurocidin, CAP18) that activate endothelial cells, and increase vessel permeability (16). Discharge of the neutrophil granular cargo of antimicrobial proteins and proteases further increases the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes by various mechanisms (21). Monocytes at the affected site act in concert with the recruited neutrophils and macrophages to eliminate the damage-inflicting source. Finally, a switch in lipid signaling from proinflammatory prostaglandins and leukotrienes to anti-inflammatory prostaglandins and lipoxins blocks further recruitment of neutrophils and induces their apoptosis and clearance by macrophages, thus enabling the resolution of inflammation and the reestablishment of tissue homeostasis (22, 23).

Figure 1.

Innate immune response to tissue damage. I, DAMPs released from necrotic cells and damaged tissue activate PRRs in resident DCs, macrophages and mast cells, and in patrolling blood monocytes, leading to the secretion of inflammatory mediators and vasodilators [TNF-α, IL-1β, prostaglandin (PG), histamine, and nitric oxide (NO)]. II, activation of endothelial cells and the production of CXC chemokines by innate and stromal cells recruit neutrophils. III, in parallel, inflammasome activation leads to the regulated secretion of IL-18 that induces IL-23 production in DCs and in turn IL-22 in ILC, thereby promoting regeneration of the epithelium. IV, recruited neutrophils migrating to the affected tissue mediate recruitment of inflammatory monocytes, which differentiate into tissue macrophages and promote further monocyte recruitment. V, type II polarization by TGF-β and IL-4 supports production of protumorigenic mediators such as EGF, FGF-2, and VEFG. VI, persistent inflammasome signaling may promote tumorigenesis by loss of epithelial barrier integrity and in part by sustained/unopposed IL-22 production. BM, bone marrow; ECM, extracellular matrix; HA, hyaluronic acid; ROS, reactive oxigen species; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase.

Figure 1.

Innate immune response to tissue damage. I, DAMPs released from necrotic cells and damaged tissue activate PRRs in resident DCs, macrophages and mast cells, and in patrolling blood monocytes, leading to the secretion of inflammatory mediators and vasodilators [TNF-α, IL-1β, prostaglandin (PG), histamine, and nitric oxide (NO)]. II, activation of endothelial cells and the production of CXC chemokines by innate and stromal cells recruit neutrophils. III, in parallel, inflammasome activation leads to the regulated secretion of IL-18 that induces IL-23 production in DCs and in turn IL-22 in ILC, thereby promoting regeneration of the epithelium. IV, recruited neutrophils migrating to the affected tissue mediate recruitment of inflammatory monocytes, which differentiate into tissue macrophages and promote further monocyte recruitment. V, type II polarization by TGF-β and IL-4 supports production of protumorigenic mediators such as EGF, FGF-2, and VEFG. VI, persistent inflammasome signaling may promote tumorigenesis by loss of epithelial barrier integrity and in part by sustained/unopposed IL-22 production. BM, bone marrow; ECM, extracellular matrix; HA, hyaluronic acid; ROS, reactive oxigen species; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase.

Close modal

Dendritic cells.

Appropriate immune responses result from a tightly coordinated interaction between the innate and the adaptive immune system. Cells of the innate immune system translate danger signals captured from the environment to the adaptive immune system, which, through antigen-specific immune responses, controls the invasion of pathogens. Several types of innate immune cells have the ability to process and present antigens, and among them, DCs, known as professional antigen-presenting cell (APC), have also the unique characteristic to prime naïve T cells and therefore efficiently initiate the adaptive immune response (24, 25). APCs originate in the bone marrow and migrate to and seed all tissues. The primary role of DCs is to capture self- and non–self-antigens, process, and present them in the form of peptide- MHC to cells of the adaptive immune system (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells; ref. 26). DCs actively ingest antigens by phagocytosis, using complement, Fc, and c-type lectin receptors. The ingestion of antigens in conjunction with the engagement of PRRs induces DC maturation, expression of chemokine receptors, and migration to lymphoid organs. At this stage, DCs have acquired the license to prime T cells and in turn initiate the adaptive immune response (25). Depending on the type of pathogens encountered, DCs present antigens through two types of MHC, namely class I or class II (27–29). CD4+ T cells are primed through MHC class II, whereas CD8+ T cells are primed through MHC class I (27). For example, antigens derived from viruses are presented in complex with MHC class I to CD8+ T cells. In general extracellular antigens are presented through MHC class II, although they can also be presented through MHC class I to CD8+ T cells in a process known as cross-presentation (29–31).

Innate lymphoid cells.

ILCs are characterized by the absence of recombination activating genes (RAG-1 or RAG-2)-dependent rearranged antigen receptors and lack of phenotypic markers of myeloid and DCs. ILCs are divided into three major groups based on phenotypic and functional characteristics. ILC1 produce the signature cytokine and master transcriptional regulator of T helper 1 (TH1) cells, namely IFN-γ and Tbet, but not the signature cytokines of T helper 2 (TH2) and T helper 17 (TH17) cells. NK cells are the prototypical members of this group. ILC2 produce IL-5, IL-13, and express Gata3, the signature cytokines and master transcriptional regulator of TH2 cells. ILC3 express IL-17a, IL-22, and RORγt, the signature cytokines and master transcriptional regulator of TH17 cells (32). In general, ILCs are a source for cytokines very early after infection and tissue damage and therefore have a critical role in cytokine-mediated activation of the immune system and promotion of epithelial cell barrier integrity (33). In addition, ILC3 express MHC class II as well as process and present antigens to CD4+ T cells, thereby limiting commensal-specific CD4 T-cell responses in the intestine (34).

In contrast with the protective properties observed during infection and tissue damage, ILCs, in particular ILC3, have been linked to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; refs. 35, 36). Results from human genetic studies have correlated the mutations in IL-23R with IBD (37); as the production of IL-22 by ILC3 can be induced efficiently by IL-23, a pathogenic role of IL-22/ILC3 has been suggested (38). However, IL-22 is not the only downstream target of IL-23 and results from murine studies indicated both context-dependent beneficial and pathogenic effects of IL-22 during colitis (39–41). Therefore, the functions of ILC3 and IL-22 in patients with IBD need to be clarified in future studies. Likewise, ILC3 have been implicated in colorectal cancer (42), as discussed below.

Pattern recognition receptors

Toll-like receptor signaling.

TLRs are a family of transmembrane receptors that recognize conserved molecular patterns of microbial origin; they play a crucial role upon tissue damage by regulating tissue repair and inflammation. Ligands of TLRs can be either exogenous [microbial, such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP)] or endogenous (such as HSPs and uric acid crystals). Different microbial ligands are recognized by different TLRs; for example, lipopolysaccharide is recognized by TLR-4, and bacterial flagellin by TLR-5 (for review, see ref. 43). TLRs are localized in different subcellular compartments. TLRs that recognize lipid or protein ligands are expressed on the plasma membrane (TLR-1, -2, -4, -5, -6), whereas those that respond to viral nucleic acids are in the endolysosomal compartment (TLR-3, -7, -9). Upon binding of the ligand, one or more adapter proteins transmit the intracellular signal. The most important adapter proteins are MyD88 and TICAM1 (TRIF; ref. 43; Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Innate immune response in inflammation. TLRs and NLRs are two forms of PRRs expressed by innate immune cells to sense and capture danger signals. Cell surface TLRs (TLR-1/2/4/5/6) sense exogenous pathogens and endolysosomal TLRs (TLR-3/7/9) recognize endogenous ligands. NLRs are cytosolic PRRs and the sensory components of the inflammasome. Both TLRs and NLRs are hardwired receptors that mediate inflammatory process to eliminate noxious sources that compromise tissue homeostasis.

Figure 2.

Innate immune response in inflammation. TLRs and NLRs are two forms of PRRs expressed by innate immune cells to sense and capture danger signals. Cell surface TLRs (TLR-1/2/4/5/6) sense exogenous pathogens and endolysosomal TLRs (TLR-3/7/9) recognize endogenous ligands. NLRs are cytosolic PRRs and the sensory components of the inflammasome. Both TLRs and NLRs are hardwired receptors that mediate inflammatory process to eliminate noxious sources that compromise tissue homeostasis.

Close modal

TLRs play an important role during host defense against infections. They regulate antimicrobial responses by epithelial cells at mucosal sites (44), enhance phagocytosis of micro-organisms (45), promote leukocyte recruitment (46), and control activation of the adaptive immune response (47). TLR signaling also promotes tissue repair and regeneration by providing prosurvival signals and inhibiting apoptosis of epithelial cells (48). Polymorphisms in TLRs have been associated with human breast, stomach, and colon cancers, indicating a potential role for TLRs during carcinogenesis (49–52). However, further studies have indicated both negative and positive regulatory properties of TLRs during tumorigenesis. Anticancer effects have been shown both in humans and mice after injection of purified TLR ligands (53–55). These results are due to increased apoptosis of tumor cells, recruitment of NK and cytotoxic T cells, and stimulation of the adaptive immune response thereby breaking tolerance to tumor self-antigens (53, 54, 56). Furthermore, TLRs are important for the recognition of viral pathogens that can promote the development of cancer, such as Epstein–Barr virus, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papillomavirus, and Helicobacter pylori (57–61). TLR signaling has also been reported to promote the growth and survival of tumor cells (62–64). MyD88 signaling has been shown to play a role during the development of colitis and colitis-associated colon cancer in murine models (65, 66). These pleiotropic functions of TLR signaling during tissue repair and tumorigenesis might be dependent on the respective milieu, cell type, and specific TLRs. Further studies are required to dissect the complex effects of TLRs during tumorigenesis.

Inflammasomes.

The inflammasome is a large complex of proteins, which has the capacity to sense various PAMP and DAMP (67, 68), and is expressed in DCs, macrophages, and epithelial cells. Upon activation, inflammasomes are able to initiate immune responses toward the invading pathogens or tissue damage. The sensory components of the inflammasome are NOD-like receptors (NLR), which constitute a large family of cytosolic PRRs composed of a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat domain (LRR), a central nucleotide-binding domain (NBD), and an N-terminal pyrin domain (PYD). It has been proposed that the LRR and NBD modules are involved in ligand sensing and autoregulation, respectively. PYD is usually involved in the recruitment of the adaptor protein ASC [apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase-associated and recruitment domain (CARD)], which in turn is associated with pro-caspase-1. The ternary protein complex formed by NLRs, ASC (if required, as some NLRs contain CARD), and caspase-1 is referred to as an inflammasome.

Activation of the inflammasome complex leads to autocleavage and activation of pro-caspase-1, which in turn is responsible for the processing and secretion of the mature forms of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, and the secretion of IL-33 and FGF-2. The activity of these cytokines has been linked to several types of cancer (69). The activation of inflammasomes in certain cases can be followed by a lethal process called “pyroptosis”. Contrary to classical apoptosis, pyroptosis promotes local inflammation associated with the release of IL-1β and IL-18, and this mechanism of cell death is important to promote both the suicide of engulfed macrophages and cell-autonomous tumor suppression. Overall, inflammasomes sense the environment and modulate two key aspects of inflammation: proinflammatory cytokine activation and cell death, both of which are critical to tumor growth.

Paradigms for the role of innate immune cells in cancer

Innate cell polarization.

Macrophages and neutrophils exist in a range of activation states that reflect their environment, and they can be polarized towards functional subclasses depending on the nature of the stress afflicting the tissue. One polarizing extreme is induced by IFN-γ–producing TH1 cells and the engagement of TLRs by bacterial products, as in the case of bacterial or viral infection, generating conventionally activated macrophages (M1), neutrophils (N1), and myeloid progenitor cells. In contrast, responses to parasitic infections and wound healing involve the production of type II cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, and TGF-β, which drive “alternative” (M2/N2) cell activation (15, 17, 70). These polarized activation states are contrasting driving forces in tumorigenesis, whereas M1/N1 cells are tumoricidal and destructive to the tissue (71, 72), M2/N2 cells account for the production of growth factors (e.g., EGF, FGF-2), angiogenic factors (e.g., VEGF, MMP-9), and inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1), which collectively promote tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis (73–75). Extreme stress conditions such as hypoxia, necrosis, and injury are hallmarks of the tumor microenvironment and are exploited by the tumor to recruit and polarize inflammatory myeloid cells towards the tumor-promoting state (76–79).

Control of tissue regeneration and integrity.

There is a network between different cells of the innate immune system that controls not only the adaptive immune response, but also the microflora, tissue regeneration, and carcinogenesis, particularly in the intestine. One example for such a complex regulatory mechanism is the control of IL-22 by DCs in the intestine. IL-22, a member of the IL-10 cytokine family can be produced by ILC3 and TH17 cells. IL-22 has a protective function during the early phase of tissue damage (39, 80), whereby it promotes the activation of intestinal stem cells and in turn the wound healing of the intestine (81). However, a high concentration of free IL-22 over a long period of time can be detrimental. IL-22 has been shown to promote colitis, which is associated with mucosal hyperplasia (41). Furthermore, results from several recent articles have shown that IL-22 can also promote tumorigenesis in the intestine (42, 82–85). Accordingly, IL-22 needs to be carefully controlled, and this regulation can be exerted by DCs in the intestine by at least two mechanisms. First, DCs have the capacity to promote the expression of IL-22 through the production of IL-23. DCs in the intestine participate in immune surveillance for possible pathogenic invasion. For example, microbial penetration and the presence of flagellin promote the activation of a particular subset of DCs, which are present in the lamina propria and which coexpress CD11b and CD103. Upon activation via TLR-5, these DCs produce a large amount of IL-23, which in turn boosts the production of IL-22 (38).

DCs can also control IL-22 via the production of a soluble IL-22 receptor [IL-22 binding protein (IL22BP, IL22Ra2)]. IL-22BP is produced by DCs in steady-state conditions (82, 86). Upon sensing tissue damage, the inflammasome shuts down the expression of IL-22BP via IL-18 activation, thereby allowing IL-22 to exert its protective effect. This is one example for a complex mechanism by which DCs regulate the availability and production of one cytokine to control homeostasis in the intestine. Perturbation of this coordinated crosstalk between microflora, DCs, and ILC3 at any stage may alter the balance in the intestine and result in increased tumorigenesis.

Immunosurveillance and immunoediting.

The capacity of DCs to prime CD8+ T cells and trigger their cytotoxic activity against neoplastic cells is considered to be one of the key mechanisms by which the immune system can monitor and control the growth of tumor. In 1957, Sir Macfarlane Brunet and Lewis Thomas proposed for the first time the hypothesis of “cancer immunosurveillance” (87). The hypothesis, initially vague, has been validated by recent data, which clearly show that the immune system can interact with neoplastic cells and DCs are one of the pivotal components in this immunosurveillance. DCs can present tumor antigens to the adaptive immune system, which in turn is instructed to control the growth of transformed cells. Mice that lack RAG-1 or RAG-2 cannot produce lymphocytes and they have higher susceptibility to develop tumors (88). One of the most convincing lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis of tumor immunosurveillance is provided by humans afflicted by paraneoplastic syndromes, which are neurologic disorders that arise as a consequence of an antitumor immune response. The same antigens, which are normally expressed in neurons, can be expressed in breast cancer cells and some other carcinomas. Some patients with paraneoplastic syndromes develop a strong antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell–mediated response that efficiently controls tumor expansion, but that concomitantly results in autoimmune cerebellar degeneration (30). Immunosurveillance may be defined as the first stage of a continual “immunoediting” process in which tumor cells circumvent antitumor T-cell activity by the emergence of less immunogenic cells within the tumor (89, 90). Moreover, the tumor microenvironment can block tumor-specific T-cell responses by converting myeloid cells into potent immunosuppressive cells (91, 92).

Innate immunity is mediated by a network of tissue-resident, circulating, and recruited immune cells equipped with sensors for tissue damage and infection. Recent studies have highlighted the intricate interactions among the components involved in a successful inflammatory response. What enables the neutralization of a damage-inflicting source is the balance between activating and inhibitory signals that shape the nature and intensity of effector molecules production. Malfunction in components of this system can lead to a breakdown of tissue homeostasis. This is best exemplified by clinical studies and animal models indicating that chronic inflammation may promote tumorigenesis. While much has been learned about acute inflammatory responses to injury and infection, our knowledge of chronic inflammatory processes is still at an early stage. Further studies are required to delineate these processes in greater detail to specifically manipulate innate immune cells for effective cancer therapy.

Conception and design: N. Gagliani, R. Nowarski, S. Huber

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: N. Gagliani, R. Nowarski, S. Huber

Study supervision: R.A. Flavell

1.
Kumar
V
,
Abbas
AK
,
Fausto
N
,
Aster
JC
. 
Robbins pathologic basis of disease
.
Philadelphia, PA
:
W.B. Saunders
; 
2010
:
184
.
2.
Medzhitov
R
. 
Origin and physiological roles of inflammation
.
Nature
2008
;
454
:
428
35
.
3.
Nathan
C
. 
Points of control in inflammation
.
Nature
2002
;
420
:
846
52
.
4.
Barton
GM
. 
A calculated response: control of inflammation by the innate immune system
.
J Clin Invest
2008
;
118
:
413
20
.
5.
Medzhitov
R
. 
Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response
.
Nature
2007
;
449
:
819
26
.
6.
Orkin
SH
,
Zon
LI
. 
Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology
.
Cell
2008
;
132
:
631
44
.
7.
Zovein
AC
,
Hofmann
JJ
,
Lynch
M
,
French
WJ
,
Turlo
KA
,
Yang
Y
, et al
Fate tracing reveals the endothelial origin of hematopoietic stem cells
.
Cell Stem Cell
2008
;
3
:
625
36
.
8.
Kondo
M
,
Wagers
AJ
,
Manz
MG
,
Prohaska
SS
,
Scherer
DC
,
Beilhack
GF
, et al
Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application
.
Ann Rev Immunol
2003
;
21
:
759
806
.
9.
Takizawa
H
,
Boettcher
S
,
Manz
MG
. 
Demand-adapted regulation of early hematopoiesis in infection and inflammation
.
Blood
2012
;
119
:
2991
3002
.
10.
Jenkins
SJ
,
Ruckerl
D
,
Cook
PC
,
Jones
LH
,
Finkelman
FD
,
van Rooijen
N
, et al
Local macrophage proliferation, rather than recruitment from the blood, is a signature of TH2 inflammation
.
Science
2011
;
332
:
1284
8
.
11.
Galli
SJ
,
Borregaard
N
,
Wynn
TA
. 
Phenotypic and functional plasticity of cells of innate immunity: macrophages, mast cells and neutrophils
.
Nat Immunol
2011
;
12
:
1035
44
.
12.
Gautier
EL
,
Shay
T
,
Miller
J
,
Greter
M
,
Jakubzick
C
,
Ivanov
S
, et al
Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages
.
Nat Immunol
2012
;
13
:
1118
28
.
13.
Schulz
C
,
Gomez Perdiguero
E
,
Chorro
L
,
Szabo-Rogers
H
,
Cagnard
N
,
Kierdorf
K
, et al
A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells
.
Science
2012
;
336
:
86
90
.
14.
Wynn
TA
,
Chawla
A
,
Pollard
JW
. 
Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease
.
Nature
2013
;
496
:
445
55
.
15.
Geissmann
F
,
Manz
MG
,
Jung
S
,
Sieweke
MH
,
Merad
M
,
Ley
K
. 
Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells
.
Science
2010
;
327
:
656
61
.
16.
Borregaard
N
. 
Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes
.
Immunity
2010
;
33
:
657
70
.
17.
Mantovani
A
,
Cassatella
MA
,
Costantini
C
,
Jaillon
S
. 
Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity
.
Nat Rev Immunol
2011
;
11
:
519
31
.
18.
Soehnlein
O
,
Lindbom
L
. 
Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation
.
Nat Rev Immunol
2010
;
10
:
427
39
.
19.
Auffray
C
,
Fogg
D
,
Garfa
M
,
Elain
G
,
Join-Lambert
O
,
Kayal
S
, et al
Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behavior
.
Science
2007
;
317
:
666
70
.
20.
Newton
K
,
Dixit
VM
. 
Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation
.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol
2012
;
4
:
1
19
.
21.
Soehnlein
O
,
Lindbom
L
,
Weber
C
. 
Mechanisms underlying neutrophil-mediated monocyte recruitment
.
Blood
2009
;
114
:
4613
23
.
22.
Funk
CD
. 
Prostaglandins and leukotrienes: advances in eicosanoid biology
.
Science
2001
;
294
:
1871
5
.
23.
Serhan
CN
,
Savill
J
. 
Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end
.
Nat Immunol
2005
;
6
:
1191
7
.
24.
Steinman
RM
,
Witmer
MD
,
Nussenzweig
MC
,
Chen
LL
,
Schlesinger
S
,
Cohn
ZA
. 
Dendritic cells of the mouse: identification and characterization
.
J Invest Dermatol
1980
;
75
:
14
6
.
25.
Steinman
RM
. 
Decisions about dendritic cells: past, present, and future
.
Annu Rev Immunol
2012
;
30
:
1
22
.
26.
Nussenzweig
MC
,
Steinman
RM
,
Gutchinov
B
,
Cohn
ZA
. 
Dendritic cells are accessory cells for the development of anti-trinitrophenyl cytotoxic T lymphocytes
.
J Exp Med
1980
;
152
:
1070
84
.
27.
Steinman
RM
,
Inaba
K
,
Turley
S
,
Pierre
P
,
Mellman
I
. 
Antigen capture, processing, and presentation by dendritic cells: recent cell biological studies
.
Hum Immunol
1999
;
60
:
562
7
.
28.
Trombetta
ES
,
Ebersold
M
,
Garrett
W
,
Pypaert
M
,
Mellman
I
. 
Activation of lysosomal function during dendritic cell maturation
.
Science
2003
;
299
:
1400
3
.
29.
Inaba
K
,
Turley
S
,
Yamaide
F
,
Iyoda
T
,
Mahnke
K
,
Inaba
M
, et al
Efficient presentation of phagocytosed cellular fragments on the major histocompatibility complex class II products of dendritic cells
.
J Exp Med
1998
;
188
:
2163
73
.
30.
Albert
ML
,
Pearce
SF
,
Francisco
LM
,
Sauter
B
,
Roy
P
,
Silverstein
RL
, et al
Immature dendritic cells phagocytose apoptotic cells via alphavbeta5 and CD36, and cross-present antigens to cytotoxic T lymphocytes
.
J Exp Med
1998
;
188
:
1359
68
.
31.
Cheong
C
,
Matos
I
,
Choi
JH
,
Dandamudi
DB
,
Shrestha
E
,
Longhi
MP
, et al
Microbial stimulation fully differentiates monocytes to DC-SIGN/CD209(+) dendritic cells for immune T cell areas
.
Cell
2010
;
143
:
416
29
.
32.
Spits
H
,
Artis
D
,
Colonna
M
,
Diefenbach
A
,
Di Santo
JP
,
Eberl
G
, et al
Innate lymphoid cells–a proposal for uniform nomenclature
.
Nat Rev Immunol
2013
;
13
:
145
9
.
33.
Spits
H
,
Cupedo
T
. 
Innate lymphoid cells: emerging insights in development, lineage relationships, and function
.
Annu Rev Immunol
2012
;
30
:
647
75
.
34.
Hepworth
MR
,
Monticelli
LA
,
Fung
TC
,
Ziegler
CG
,
Grunberg
S
,
Sinha
R
, et al
Innate lymphoid cells regulate CD4 T-cell responses to intestinal commensal bacteria
.
Nature
2013
;
498
:
113
7
.
35.
Geremia
A
,
Arancibia-Carcamo
CV
,
Fleming
MP
,
Rust
N
,
Singh
B
,
Mortensen
NJ
, et al
IL-23-responsive innate lymphoid cells are increased in inflammatory bowel disease
.
J Exp Med
2011
;
208
:
1127
33
.
36.
Takayama
T
,
Kamada
N
,
Chinen
H
,
Okamoto
S
,
Kitazume
MT
,
Chang
J
, et al
Imbalance of NKp44(+)NKp46(−) and NKp44(−)NKp46(+) natural killer cells in the intestinal mucosa of patients with Crohn's disease
.
Gastroenterology
2011
;
139
:
882
92
.
37.
Duerr
RH
,
Taylor
KD
,
Brant
SR
,
Rioux
JD
,
Silverberg
MS
,
Daly
MJ
, et al
A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene
.
Science
2006
;
314
:
1461
3
.
38.
Kinnebrew
MA
,
Buffie
CG
,
Diehl
GE
,
Zenewicz
LA
,
Leiner
I
,
Hohl
TM
, et al
Interleukin 23 production by intestinal CD103(+)CD11b(+) dendritic cells in response to bacterial flagellin enhances mucosal innate immune defense
.
Immunity
2012
;
36
:
276
87
.
39.
Zenewicz
LA
,
Yancopoulos
GD
,
Valenzuela
DM
,
Murphy
AJ
,
Stevens
S
,
Flavell
RA
. 
Innate and adaptive interleukin-22 protects mice from inflammatory bowel disease
.
Immunity
2008
;
29
:
947
57
.
40.
Sugimoto
K
,
Ogawa
A
,
Mizoguchi
E
,
Shimomura
Y
,
Andoh
A
,
Bhan
AK
, et al
IL-22 ameliorates intestinal inflammation in a mouse model of ulcerative colitis
.
J Clin Invest
2008
;
118
:
534
44
.
41.
Kamanaka
M
,
Huber
S
,
Zenewicz
LA
,
Gagliani
N
,
Rathinam
C
,
O'Connor
W
 Jr
, et al
Memory/effector (CD45RB(lo)) CD4 T cells are controlled directly by IL-10 and cause IL-22-dependent intestinal pathology
.
J Exp Med
2011
;
208
:
1027
40
.
42.
Kirchberger
S
,
Royston
DJ
,
Boulard
O
,
Thornton
E
,
Franchini
F
,
Szabady
RL
, et al
Innate lymphoid cells sustain colon cancer through production of interleukin-22 in a mouse model
.
J Exp Med
2013
;
210
:
917
31
.
43.
Rakoff-Nahoum
S
,
Medzhitov
R
. 
Toll-like receptors and cancer
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2009
;
9
:
57
63
.
44.
Ganz
T
. 
Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity
.
Nat Rev Immunol
2003
;
3
:
710
20
.
45.
Blander
JM
,
Medzhitov
R
. 
Regulation of phagosome maturation by signals from toll-like receptors
.
Science
2004
;
304
:
1014
8
.
46.
Picker
LJ
,
Butcher
EC
. 
Physiological and molecular mechanisms of lymphocyte homing
.
Annu Rev Immunol
1992
;
10
:
561
91
.
47.
Schnare
M
,
Barton
GM
,
Holt
AC
,
Takeda
K
,
Akira
S
,
Medzhitov
R
. 
Toll-like receptors control activation of adaptive immune responses
.
Nat Immunol
2001
;
2
:
947
50
.
48.
Melmed
G
,
Thomas
LS
,
Lee
N
,
Tesfay
SY
,
Lukasek
K
,
Michelsen
KS
, et al
Human intestinal epithelial cells are broadly unresponsive to Toll-like receptor 2-dependent bacterial ligands: implications for host-microbial interactions in the gut
.
J Immunol
2003
;
170
:
1406
15
.
49.
El-Omar
EM
,
Ng
MT
,
Hold
GL
. 
Polymorphisms in Toll-like receptor genes and risk of cancer
.
Oncogene
2008
;
27
:
244
52
.
50.
Boraska Jelavic
T
,
Barisic
M
,
Drmic Hofman
I
,
Boraska
V
,
Vrdoljak
E
,
Peruzović
M
, et al
Microsatelite GT polymorphism in the toll-like receptor 2 is associated with colorectal cancer
.
Clin Genet
2006
;
70
:
156
60
.
51.
Hold
GL
,
Rabkin
CS
,
Chow
WH
,
Smith
MG
,
Gammon
MD
,
Risch
HA
, et al
A functional polymorphism of toll-like receptor 4 gene increases risk of gastric carcinoma and its precursors
.
Gastroenterology
2007
;
132
:
905
12
.
52.
Tahara
T
,
Arisawa
T
,
Wang
F
,
Shibata
T
,
Nakamura
M
,
Sakata
M
, et al
Toll-like receptor 2 -196 to 174del polymorphism influences the susceptibility of Japanese people to gastric cancer
.
Cancer Sci
2007
;
98
:
1790
4
.
53.
Garay
RP
,
Viens
P
,
Bauer
J
,
Normier
G
,
Bardou
M
,
Jeannin
JF
, et al
Cancer relapse under chemotherapy: why TLR2/4 receptor agonists can help
.
Eur J Pharmacol
2007
;
563
:
1
17
.
54.
Krieg
AM
. 
Development of TLR9 agonists for cancer therapy
.
J Clin Invest
2007
;
117
:
1184
94
.
55.
Sfondrini
L
,
Rossini
A
,
Besusso
D
,
Merlo
A
,
Tagliabue
E
,
Mènard
S
, et al
Antitumor activity of the TLR-5 ligand flagellin in mouse models of cancer
.
J Immunol
2006
;
176
:
6624
30
.
56.
Salaun
B
,
Coste
I
,
Rissoan
MC
,
Lebecque
SJ
,
Renno
T
. 
TLR3 can directly trigger apoptosis in human cancer cells
.
J Immunol
2006
;
176
:
4894
901
.
57.
Gaudreault
E
,
Fiola
S
,
Olivier
M
,
Gosselin
J
. 
Epstein-Barr virus induces MCP-1 secretion by human monocytes via TLR2
.
J Virol
2007
;
81
:
8016
24
.
58.
Broering
R
,
Wu
J
,
Meng
Z
,
Hilgard
P
,
Lu
M
,
Trippler
M
, et al
Toll-like receptor-stimulated non-parenchymal liver cells can regulate hepatitis C virus replication
.
J Hepatol
2008
;
48
:
914
22
.
59.
Wu
J
,
Lu
M
,
Meng
Z
,
Trippler
M
,
Broering
R
,
Szczeponek
A
, et al
Toll-like receptor-mediated control of HBV replication by nonparenchymal liver cells in mice
.
Hepatology
2007
;
46
:
1769
78
.
60.
Yang
R
,
Murillo
FM
,
Cui
H
,
Blosser
R
,
Uematsu
S
,
Takeda
K
, et al
Papillomavirus-like particles stimulate murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells to produce alpha interferon and Th1 immune responses via MyD88
.
J Virol
2004
;
78
:
11152
60
.
61.
Ferrero
RL
. 
Innate immune recognition of the extracellular mucosal pathogen, Helicobacter pylori
.
Mol Immunol
2005
;
42
:
879
85
.
62.
Huang
B
,
Zhao
J
,
Shen
S
,
Li
H
,
He
KL
,
Shen
GX
, et al
Listeria monocytogenes promotes tumor growth via tumor cell toll-like receptor 2 signaling
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
4346
52
.
63.
Jego
G
,
Bataille
R
,
Geffroy-Luseau
A
,
Descamps
G
,
Pellat-Deceunynck
C
. 
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns are growth and survival factors for human myeloma cells through Toll-like receptors
.
Leukemia
2006
;
20
:
1130
7
.
64.
Bohnhorst
J
,
Rasmussen
T
,
Moen
SH
,
Flottum
M
,
Knudsen
L
,
Børset
M
, et al
Toll-like receptors mediate proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells
.
Leukemia
2006
;
20
:
1138
44
.
65.
Rakoff-Nahoum
S
,
Medzhitov
R
. 
Regulation of spontaneous intestinal tumorigenesis through the adaptor protein MyD88
.
Science
2007
;
317
:
124
7
.
66.
Rakoff-Nahoum
S
,
Hao
L
,
Medzhitov
R
. 
Role of toll-like receptors in spontaneous commensal-dependent colitis
.
Immunity
2006
;
25
:
319
29
.
67.
Martinon
F
,
Mayor
A
,
Tschopp
J
. 
The inflammasomes: guardians of the body
.
Annu Rev Immunol
2009
;
27
:
229
65
.
68.
Strowig
T
,
Henao-Mejia
J
,
Elinav
E
,
Flavell
R
. 
Inflammasomes in health and disease
.
Nature
2012
;
481
:
278
86
.
69.
Zitvogel
L
,
Kepp
O
,
Galluzzi
L
,
Kroemer
G
. 
Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses
.
Nat Immunol
2012
;
13
:
343
51
.
70.
Gordon
S
,
Martinez
FO
. 
Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions
.
Immunity
2010
;
32
:
593
604
.
71.
Fridlender
ZG
,
Sun
J
,
Kim
S
,
Kapoor
V
,
Cheng
G
,
Ling
L
, et al
Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: “N1” versus “N2” TAN
.
Cancer Cell
2009
;
16
:
183
94
.
72.
Beatty
GL
,
Chiorean
EG
,
Fishman
MP
,
Saboury
B
,
Teitelbaum
UR
,
Sun
W
, et al
CD40 agonists alter tumor stroma and show efficacy against pancreatic carcinoma in mice and humans
.
Science
2011
;
331
:
1612
6
.
73.
Coussens
LM
,
Werb
Z
. 
Inflammation and cancer
.
Nature
2002
;
420
:
860
7
.
74.
Balkwill
F
,
Charles
KA
,
Mantovani
A
. 
Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease
.
Cancer Cell
2005
;
7
:
211
7
.
75.
Qian
BZ
,
Pollard
JW
. 
Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis
.
Cell
2010
;
141
:
39
51
.
76.
Dvorak
HF
,
Flier
J
,
Frank
H
. 
Tumors - wounds that do not heal - similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound-healing
.
New Engl J Med
1986
;
315
:
1650
9
.
77.
Hanahan
D
,
Weinberg
RA
. 
Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation
.
Cell
2011
;
144
:
646
74
.
78.
Mantovani
A
,
Allavena
P
,
Sica
A
,
Balkwill
F
. 
Cancer-related inflammation
.
Nature
2008
;
454
:
436
44
.
79.
Egeblad
M
,
Nakasone
ES
,
Werb
Z
. 
Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism
.
Dev Cell
2010
;
18
:
884
901
.
80.
Pickert
G
,
Neufert
C
,
Leppkes
M
,
Zheng
Y
,
Wittkopf
N
,
Warntjen
M
, et al
STAT3 links IL-22 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells to mucosal wound healing
.
J Exp Med
2009
;
206
:
1465
72
.
81.
Hanash
AM
,
Dudakov
JA
,
Hua
G
,
O'Connor
MH
,
Young
LF
,
Singer
NV
, et al
Interleukin-22 protects intestinal stem cells from immune-mediated tissue damage and regulates sensitivity to graft versus host disease
.
Immunity
2012
;
37
:
339
50
.
82.
Huber
S
,
Gagliani
N
,
Zenewicz
LA
,
Huber
FJ
,
Bosurgi
L
,
Hu
B
, et al
IL-22BP is regulated by the inflammasome and modulates tumorigenesis in the intestine
.
Nature
2012
;
491
:
259
63
.
83.
Grivennikov
SI
,
Wang
K
,
Mucida
D
,
Stewart
CA
,
Schnabl
B
,
Jauch
D
, et al
Adenoma-linked barrier defects and microbial products drive IL-23/IL-17-mediated tumour growth
.
Nature
2012
;
491
:
254
8
.
84.
Wu
T
,
Cui
L
,
Liang
Z
,
Liu
C
,
Liu
Y
,
Li
J
. 
Elevated serum IL-22 levels correlate with chemoresistant condition of colorectal cancer
.
Clin Immunol
2013
;
147
:
38
9
.
85.
Jiang
R
,
Wang
H
,
Deng
L
,
Hou
J
,
Shi
R
,
Yao
M
, et al
IL-22 is related to development of human colon cancer by activation of STAT3
.
BMC Cancer
2013
;
13
:
59
.
86.
Martin
JC
,
Beriou
G
,
Heslan
M
,
Chauvin
C
,
Utriainen
L
,
Aumeunier
A
, et al
Interleukin-22 binding protein (IL-22BP) is constitutively expressed by a subset of conventional dendritic cells and is strongly induced by retinoic acid
.
Mucosal Immunol.
2013 May 8
.
[Epub ahead of print]
.
87.
Burnet
FM
. 
The concept of immunological surveillance
.
Prog Exp Tumor Res
1970
;
13
:
1
27
.
88.
Shankaran
V
,
Ikeda
H
,
Bruce
AT
,
White
JM
,
Swanson
PE
,
Old
LJ
, et al
IFNγ and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity
.
Nature
2001
;
410
:
1107
11
.
89.
Matsushita
H
,
Vesely
MD
,
Koboldt
DC
,
Rickert
CG
,
Uppaluri
R
,
Magrini
VJ
, et al
Cancer exome analysis reveals a T-cell-dependent mechanism of cancer immunoediting
.
Nature
2012
;
482
:
400
4
.
90.
Schreiber
RD
,
Old
LJ
,
Smyth
MJ
. 
Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion
.
Science
2011
;
331
:
1565
70
.
91.
Gallina
G
,
Dolcetti
L
,
Serafini
P
,
De Santo
C
,
Marigo
I
,
Colombo
MP
, et al
Tumors induce a subset of inflammatory monocytes with immunosuppressive activity on CD8+ T cells
.
J Clin Invest
2006
;
116
:
2777
90
.
92.
Gabrilovich
DI
,
Ostrand-Rosenberg
S
,
Bronte
V
. 
Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours
.
Nat Rev Immunol
2012
;
12
:
253
68
.