Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors may initially control gastrointestinal stromal tumors, but most patients eventually experience disease progression due to activation loop mutations, which are resistant to approved drugs. However, phase I trials suggest that the cancer is sensitive to two new agents: BLU-285 and DCC-2618. In addition, liquid biopsies, which were used to follow patients during the trials, may be valuable tools in tracking disease progression and assessing tumor heterogeneity.
Mutations in KIT and PDGFRA are genetic drivers in more than 85% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as imatinib (Gleevec; Novartis), may initially control the cancer, but most patients eventually experience disease progression due to activation loop mutations, which are resistant to approved drugs. However, results of two trials presented in early December at the EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics in Munich, Germany, suggest that GIST is sensitive to two new agents: BLU-285 (Blueprint Medicines) and DCC-2618 (Deciphera Pharmaceuticals).
In an ongoing phase I trial of BLU-285, researchers enrolled 36 patients who had advanced, inoperable GIST, some of whom had worsening disease despite having had at least two prior treatments with TKIs. All of the patients had exon 17 KIT or PDGFRA D842V activation loop mutations, which are selectively targeted by the drug. CT and MRI scans showed that tumors shrank in 14 of 15 evaluable patients with mutant PDGFRA and five of 13 evaluable patients with KIT-driven disease, with responses seen in as little as 2 months, reported Michael Heinrich, MD, of Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.
Heinrich noted that the treatment was well tolerated and that 27 patients continue to be treated, including all 18 patients with PDGFRA-mutant GIST, with a treatment duration of 0.8 months to 12.3 months. “In addition, there was a more than 10-fold reduction in levels of PDGFRA-mutated DNA circulating in the blood, and we saw this even before the imaging scans confirmed that tumors were shrinking,” he said.
In a separate trial, researchers enrolled 24 patients with a variety of solid tumors in a phase I dose-escalation trial of DCC-2618, a pan-KIT and PDGFRA inhibitor. All but three of the patients had been diagnosed with GIST; one had wild-type disease and the others had a mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA. One patient with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) had amplifications in both. The other two patients were diagnosed with thymic carcinoma with a KIT exon 13 mutation and a pelvic desmoid tumor without known mutations, respectively. All of the patients received a baseline PET scan, followed by a second scan after they had taken DCC-2618 for 21 days.
“While it is early, we observed signs of benefit in the GIST patients … whose disease had progressed despite multiple previous treatments,” said Filip Janku, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. “Early partial metabolic responses, a sign of reduced tumor metabolic activity, were observed in 14 of the 15 patients evaluated with KIT-mutant GIST.” One of two patients with a PDGFRA mutation experienced stable disease; the patient with wild-type GIST did not respond.
Janku added that the patient with GBM experienced improvements “relatively early in treatment as the tumor shrank slowly but steadily, and today, more than 12 months later, the patient is continuing to do well. We are very excited to see the response in this patient as it is a very hard cancer to treat.”
During the trial, Janku's team captured cell-free DNA from patients' blood and used next-generation sequencing to identify and track molecular alterations to help them understand why patients responded, as well as intrinsic or adaptive resistance to DCC-2618.
“Even though phase I dose escalation is occurring, we see very impressive responses,” said Jean-Charles Soria, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France, who chaired the symposium's scientific committee. Also notable, he said, was that “liquid biopsies revealed in real-time the presence of multiple mutations reflecting tumor heterogeneity that might have been missed even in an invasive tissue biopsy.”
Liquid biopsies are expensive, but researchers emphasized that the cost could be offset by savings elsewhere. For example, liquid biopsies could replace more invasive tissue biopsies, said George Demetri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA. More savings could come from not having to do CT scans and from avoiding expensive “wrong” drugs that won't benefit particular patients.
Although conducting serial liquid biopsies won't soon become standard practice, Soria predicted that it will “completely change the rules of engagement for the management of patients.” –Suzanne Rose
For more news on cancer research, visit Cancer Discovery online at http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/early/by/section.