Summary: Epigenetic targets are exciting new avenues for cancer drug discovery. Zhang and colleagues have designed the open-source EZH2 inhibitor JQEZ5 and shown antitumor efficacy in vitro and in vivo in preclinical studies in murine and human lung adenocarcinoma models expressing high levels of EZH2. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 949–52. ©2016 AACR.

See related article by Zhang and colleagues, p. 1006.

Cancer cell growth depends upon selective gene expression. Although mutations in “driver” oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes can alter gene expression, other important mechanisms involve changes to the cancer epigenome. If these changes can be identified and thwarted, such approaches would represent important new tools for the early detection, prevention, and rational treatment of cancers, such as lung cancer, the biggest cancer killer of men and women in the United States. Zhang and colleagues address one important such mechanism (and target) involving EZH2 of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2; ref. 1). As part of their study, they developed genetically engineered mouse models of lung cancer driven by overexpression of EZH2 in target tissues and examined human lung cancer lines and databases to study lung adenocarcinomas that greatly overexpress EZH2. EZH2 was then targeted genetically and chemically with the new open-source EZH2 inhibitor probe JQEZ5 that they developed, which demonstrated anticancer effects. Although the compound (or its derivatives) will need additional refinement for optimal clinical applications, it serves as an excellent probe for research and reinforces EZH2 as an important target in lung adenocarcinoma.

Chromatin-associated complexes can alter chromosomal DNA or its associated histones, leading to altered transcription. PRC2 is an assembly of polycomb group (PcG) proteins including embryonic ectoderm development protein (EED), suppressor of zeste protein (SUZ12), retinoblastoma associated protein (RbAp46/48) and the enhancer of zeste homolog polypeptide (EZH1 or EZH2; ref. 2). EZH2, but not EZH1, is expressed in proliferating cells. The 746–amino acid EZH2 has domains providing scaffolding for PRC2 proteins and a C-terminal Su(var)3-9 enhancer of zeste trithorax (SET) enzymatic domain (3–5). Chemical biology is at the heart of Zhang and colleagues' work, requiring understanding of the enzymology involved. The EZH2 SET domain has S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) and H3 histone N-terminal tail lysine binding sites connected by a narrow channel for methyl transfer. After the binding of positively charged SAM and positively charged histone tail lysine to SET, water-mediated deprotonation of the H3K27 ϵ-amino group occurs at the active site (6). The H3K27 ϵ-amino group then performs a nucleophilic attack on the methyl donor SAM. The methyl group from SAM is transferred to the ϵ-amino group of the substrate lysine by an SN2 substitution reaction sequentially producing S-adenosyl-homocysteine (SAH) and H3K27me3 (Fig. 1A). Notably, PRC2 contains an unusual split catalytic domain consisting of the SET activation loop (SAL) from the N-terminal portion of EZH2 and the SET domain at its C-terminus (4).

Figure 1.

A, Enzymatic activity of PRC2. The residues in the active site including Y726 lower the pKa of the substrate lysine side chain and provide a solvent channel so that water can deprotonate the ϵ-amino group. The amino group can then perform a nucleophilic attack on nearby SAM yielding methylated H3K27 and SAH. The EZH2 and its partner EED and SUZ12 polypeptides catalyze these reactions. B, EZH2 inhibitors. Each of the preclinical and clinical molecules shown has a pyridine-amide core except CPI-1205. The compounds in clinical studies are tazemetostat, GSK2816126, and CPI-1205. C, Structure of PRC2 bound to an inhibitor (Inhibitor 1). The structure model was made based on PDB 5IJ7 (3), and the image was rendered by PyMOL [www.pymol.org (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 Schrödinger, LLC)]. EED is shown in light blue and SUZ12(VEFS) in light pink. EZH2 is represented by gray except for the SAL and SET regions, which are highlighted in green and yellow, respectively. The bound EZH2 inhibitor is shown as a space-filling model.

Figure 1.

A, Enzymatic activity of PRC2. The residues in the active site including Y726 lower the pKa of the substrate lysine side chain and provide a solvent channel so that water can deprotonate the ϵ-amino group. The amino group can then perform a nucleophilic attack on nearby SAM yielding methylated H3K27 and SAH. The EZH2 and its partner EED and SUZ12 polypeptides catalyze these reactions. B, EZH2 inhibitors. Each of the preclinical and clinical molecules shown has a pyridine-amide core except CPI-1205. The compounds in clinical studies are tazemetostat, GSK2816126, and CPI-1205. C, Structure of PRC2 bound to an inhibitor (Inhibitor 1). The structure model was made based on PDB 5IJ7 (3), and the image was rendered by PyMOL [www.pymol.org (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 Schrödinger, LLC)]. EED is shown in light blue and SUZ12(VEFS) in light pink. EZH2 is represented by gray except for the SAL and SET regions, which are highlighted in green and yellow, respectively. The bound EZH2 inhibitor is shown as a space-filling model.

Close modal

H3K27me3-marked chromatin recruits PRC1 complex with H2AK119 monoubiquitination activity, DNA methyltransferases that methylate CpG islands, and histone deacetylase–containing complexes. The result is steric hindrance for transcription machinery binding, chromatin compaction, and gene silencing, which leads to changes in gene expression in cancer. Although nonenzymatic transcriptional activator functions of EZH2 have been observed in some breast and prostate cancers, most research has analyzed the impact of altered H3K27me3. Global H3K27me3 increase leads to blocks in expression of differentiation genes and tumor-suppressor genes and malignant transformation. Zhang and colleagues demonstrated shifts in superenhancer signatures from H3K27ac to H3K27me3 by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing with associated decreases in gene expression in these regions by RNA sequencing (1).

Prior definitive evidence for the role of EZH2 in carcinogenesis leading up to the current study emerged with the discovery of activating mutations in the SET domain of EZH2 in B-cell lymphomas, overexpression of EZH2 in lung adenocarcinomas, and mutational inactivation of UTX histone demethylase and of the SWI/SNF complex in over 20% of cancers (7, 8). UTX mutations occur in the JmjC catalytic domain, yielding increased H3K27me3. SWI/SNF is an ATP-dependent antagonist of PRC2 gene repression such that mutational loss of one of its components—ARID1A, PBRM1, SMARCB1, or SMARCA4—also leads to increased H3K27me3 marks. These classes of mutations mimic EZH2 overactivity. As shown by Zhang and colleagues, EZH2 shRNAs inhibit growth of preclinical mouse transgenic and human lung cancer xenograft models and thus confirm the importance of EZH2 in the establishment and preservation of EZH2-positive (but pAKT-negative and pERK-negative) lung adenocarcinomas.

Because of the identification of EZH2 pathway mutations, previously high-throughput screens had been used to identify SAM-competitive inhibitors of EZH2 (9). Analogues were optimized for oral bioavailability and improved pharmacokinetics, and three—tazemetostat, GSK2816126, and CPI-1205—have entered clinical trials (NCT01897571, NCT02395601, NCT02601937, NCT02601950, and NCT02082977; Fig. 1B). The first two have a pyridine-amide core, and the last has a tetramethylpiperidinyl benzamide framework. Three other reports describe pyridine-amide–based EZH2 inhibitor chemical probes for preclinical experiments—inhibitor 1, EI1, and JQEZ5 (1, 3, 10). The structure of the latter differs from G2816126 by four methyl groups (Fig. 1B). Both cocrystallization X-ray structures of inhibitor with a human EED, human SUZ12(VEFS) domain and engineered American chameleon EZH2 subunits and in silico docking with EZH2 homology models built on the X-ray crystal structure of the H3K9 lysine methyltransferases G9a-like protein were used. A step-by-step description of “hit” optimization was reported for tazemetostat (11). The pyridine-amide type of inhibitor binds to the unique split catalytic domain of PRC2 on the interface between the EZH2 SAL and SET domains, which accounts for the remarkable selectivity displayed by these inhibitors (Fig. 1C; ref. 3).

Clinical results with three EZH2 inhibitors (tazemetostat, CPI-1205, and GSK2816126) are preliminary but encouraging. Tazemetostat was associated with cytopenias, hypertension, anorexia, and transaminasemia with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg orally twice daily. Thirteen of 47 evaluable patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) achieved objective responses, including four complete remissions and nine partial remissions (12). Complete and partial responses have also been achieved in patients with malignant rhabdoid tumors. CPI-1205 has been administered orally in a dose-escalation schedule twice daily, with low-grade diarrhea as a side effect, and has led to disease stabilization in patients with B-cell NHL. Finally, GSK2816126 has been given on a dose-escalation twice-weekly i.v. schedule to patients with NHL, multiple myeloma, or solid tumors and has been well tolerated to date (13).

Patient selection based on likely tumor EZH2 dependency will be critical for the first phase of lung cancer clinical trials, and analyses for non–small cell lung cancer tumors using Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified molecular tests that are becoming routine will facilitate this. Similarly, lymphomas with EZH2Y641 mutations, UTX histone demethylase mutations, and tumors with SWI/SNF core subunit inactivation should be more likely to respond—but time will tell. Resistance mechanisms need to be studied in preclinical models and should be anticipated, such as secondary mutations in EZH2 or the development of non-PRC2 MAPK pathway or AKT pathway activation (8, 14). Solutions to overcome such resistance may include combinations of EZH2 inhibitors or combinations with cytotoxic chemotherapy or other epigenetics or tyrosine kinase–targeted agents. The study by Zhang and colleagues indicates that EZH2 inhibitors will likely be at center stage of epigenetic cancer therapy development, and point the way to new opportunities and provide important reagents for further preclinical studies.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

X. Liu was supported by Welch Foundation research grant I-1790, CPRIT research grant R1119, a Rita Allen Foundation research grant, and NIH grant GM114576. J.D. Minna was supported by NCI SPORE P50CA70907, CTD2N CA176284, and CPRIT RP110708.

1.
Zhang
H
,
Qi
J
,
Reyes
JM
,
Li
L
,
Rao
PK
,
Li
F
, et al
Oncogenic deregulation of EZH2 as an opportunity for targeted therapy in lung cancer
.
Cancer Discov
2016
;
6
:
1006
21
.
2.
Gall Troselj
K
,
Novak Kujundzic
R
,
Ugarkovic
D
. 
Polycomb repressive complex's evolutionary conserved function: The role of EZH2 status and cellular background
.
Clin Epigenetics
2016
;
8
:
55
.
3.
Brooun
A
,
Gajiwala
KS
,
Deng
YL
,
Liu
W
,
Bolanos
B
,
Bingham
P
, et al
Polycomb repressive complex 2 structure with inhibitor reveals a mechanism of activation and drug resistance
.
Nat Commun
2016
;
7
:
11384
.
4.
Jiao
L
,
Liu
X
. 
Structural basis of histone H3K27 trimethylation by an active polycomb repressive complex 2
.
Science
2015
;
350
:
aac4383
.
5.
Justin
N
,
Zhang
Y
,
Tarricone
C
,
Martin
SR
,
Chen
S
,
Underwood
E
, et al
Structural basis of oncogenic histone H3K27M inhibition of human polycomb repressive complex 2
.
Nat Commun
2016
;
7
:
11316
.
6.
Kipp
DR
,
Quinn
CM
,
Fortin
PD
. 
Enzyme-dependent lysine deprotonation in EZH2 catalysis
.
Biochemistry
2013
;
52
:
6866
78
.
7.
Brien
GL
,
Valerio
DG
,
Armstrong
SA
. 
Exploiting the epigenome to control cancer-promoting gene-expression programs
.
Cancer Cell
2016
;
29
:
464
76
.
8.
Kim
KH
,
Roberts
CW
. 
Targeting EZH2 in cancer
.
Nat Med
2016
;
22
:
128
34
.
9.
Kaniskan
HU
,
Konze
KD
,
Jin
J
. 
Selective inhibitors of protein methyltransferases
.
J Med Chem
2015
;
58
:
1596
629
.
10.
Qi
W
,
Chan
H
,
Teng
L
,
Li
L
,
Chuai
S
,
Zhang
R
, et al
Selective inhibition of Ezh2 by a small molecule inhibitor blocks tumor cells proliferation
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2012
;
109
:
21360
5
.
11.
Kuntz
KW
,
Campbell
JE
,
Keilhack
H
,
Pollock
RM
,
Knutson
SK
,
Porter-Scott
M
, et al
The importance of being me: magic methyls, methyltransferase inhibitors, and the discovery of tazemetostat
.
J Med Chem
2016
;
59
:
1556
64
.
12.
Morera
L
,
Lubbert
M
,
Jung
M
. 
Targeting histone methyltransferases and demethylases in clinical trials for cancer therapy
.
Clin Epigenetics
2016
;
8
:
57
.
13.
Yap
T
. 
A phase 1, open-label study of GSK2816126, an enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL), other non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), multiple myeloma (MM) and solid tumor
.
J Clin Oncol
2016
;
34
:
Abstr TPS2595
.
14.
Gibaja
V
,
Shen
F
,
Harari
J
,
Korn
J
,
Ruddy
D
,
Saenz-Vash
V
, et al
Development of secondary mutations in wild-type and mutant EZH2 alleles cooperates to confer resistance to EZH2 inhibitors
.
Oncogene
2016
;
35
:
558
66
.