Abstract
Vemurafenib shows antitumor activity in some BRAFV600-mutant nonmelanoma cancers.
Major finding: Vemurafenib shows antitumor activity in some BRAFV600-mutant nonmelanoma cancers.
Mechanism: An early phase II basket study was performed to detect differences in activity across tumor types.
Impact: Further evaluation of BRAF inhibition in a subset of BRAFV600-mutant tumors is warranted.
Vemurafenib selectively inhibits the oncogenic BRAF V600 kinase and has shown clinical efficacy in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant cutaneous melanoma. BRAFV600 mutations are also present at low incidence in many nonmelanoma cancers, including non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer, and glioma; however, the efficacy of vemurafenib treatment in these tumor types has not been systematically evaluated. To detect preliminary evidence of vemurafenib activity across BRAFV600-mutant tumor types, Hyman and colleagues performed a histology-independent, flexible, early phase II basket study, in which 122 patients with various cancer types were enrolled into distinct cohorts. Clinical responses to vemurafenib treatment were observed in a subset of BRAFV600-mutant tumor types, including 8 of 20 patients with NSCLC, 6 of 18 patients with Erdheim–Chester disease or Langerhans cell histiocytosis, 2 of 7 patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer, and 1 of 8 patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, anecdotal responses were reported in patients with various other tumor types. The objective response rate was highest in patients with NSCLC (42%) and Erdheim–Chester disease or Langerhans cell histiocytosis (43%), and tumor regression was observed in the majority of patients in both cohorts, whereas patients with multiple myeloma or colorectal cancer did not respond to vemurafenib monotherapy. Amendment of the study protocol allowed for treatment of 27 patients with colorectal cancer with the combination of vemurafenib and the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab; dual treatment resulted in modest clinical activity in this heavily pretreated cohort of patients, with tumor regression in many patients and one confirmed partial response. Of note, the safety profile of vemurafenib monotherapy was similar to that reported in studies of cutaneous melanoma, with the most common adverse events being rash, fatigue, and arthralgia. These findings demonstrate that BRAFV600-mutant tumor types vary in their sensitivity to targeted BRAFV600 inhibition and suggest that vemurafenib is effective in a subset of BRAFV600-mutant nonmelanoma cancers.
Note: Research Watch is written by Cancer Discovery editorial staff. Readers are encouraged to consult the original articles for full details. For more Research Watch, visit Cancer Discovery online at http://CDnews.aacrjournals.org.