Abstract
The developed RPS-5 response prediction scheme was more predictive of pathologic complete response.
Major Finding: The developed RPS-5 response prediction scheme was more predictive of pathologic complete response.
Concept: Five breast cancer subtypes were created from gene, protein, and response data from the I-SPY2 clinical trial.
Impact: This framework allows for identification and improvement to treatment decisions in breast cancer.
Although outcomes for breast cancer have vastly improved, therapies to enhance the number of patients achieving a complete response are still needed. To address this, Wolf, Yau, and colleagues utilized data from the ongoing phase II I-SPY2 trial to predict biomarkers of drug response across 987 patients from 10 arms of this trial. The 10 arms included in this analysis were control, veliparib/carboplatin, neratinib, MK2206, ganitumab, ganetespib, trebananib, TDM1/pertuzumab, pertuzumab, and pembrolizumab with patients in each group spanning disease subtypes. Twenty-seven qualifying biomarker signatures were selected and included DNA repair deficiency, immune activation, estrogen signaling, HER2 signaling, proliferation, activation of AKT/mTOR, and angiopoietin/Tie-2 pathways, with none showing exclusivity to the arm in which they were first proposed, suggesting a broad predictive function. Those with the broadest prediction included immune, proliferation, and estrogen signaling; however, the specific biomarkers differed depending on receptor subtype and drug/drug class. Conversely, the most specific biomarker, pMTOR for MK2206, was not the most predictive. Combining predictive biology to determine a classification scheme led to the creation of the RPS-5 response-predictive subtypes, which include HER2−/Immune−/DRD−, HER2−/Immune−/DRD+, HER2−/Immune+, HER2+/BP-HER2_or_Basal, and HER2+/BP-Luminal. In silico analysis of this schema was performed to evaluate changes to the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate if treatments had been assigned based upon RPS-5 revealed an estimated overall pCR rate of 58% as compared to the actual observed rate of 35%. This gain in pCR rate was not the same among all subtypes, with the HR− HER2+ subtype showing no increase in pCR, while the HER2+/BP-HER2_or_Basal subtype showed a 16% increase in the pCR rate. Moreover, addition of new drug classes likely will lead to revisions to the classification schema. In summary, this study utilized gene expression, protein/phosphoprotein, and clinical response data obtained from the I-SPY2 trial to create a resource that tests for predictive biomarkers of response across multiple drug classes, with the developed schema allowing for individual treatment adaptations to improve overall patient outcome.
Note:Research Watch is written by Cancer Discovery editorial staff. Readers are encouraged to consult the original articles for full details. For more Research Watch, visit Cancer Discovery online at http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/CDNews.